welcome welcome central san joaquin valley economic vitality conversation september 23, 2004 made...
TRANSCRIPT
WELCOMEWELCOMECentral San Joaquin Valley
Economic Vitality Conversation
September 23, 2004
Made possible through generous support from Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Economic VitalityEconomic Vitality
in California’s in California’s Central ValleyCentral Valley
San Joaquin ValleySan Joaquin Valley
Credits & Data SourcesCredits & Data Sources
Regional Jobs InitiativeRegional Jobs Initiative
California Regional Economies ProjectCalifornia Regional Economies Project
California State University, FresnoCalifornia State University, Fresno
Central California Economic Central California Economic
Development CorporationDevelopment Corporation
PresentationPresentation
The Challenges of the San Joaquin ValleyThe Challenges of the San Joaquin Valley
Regional ActionRegional Action
Federal Government InvolvementFederal Government Involvement
Suggested Action by State GovernmentSuggested Action by State Government
The ChallengeThe Challenge
RJIRJI
The San Joaquin Valley is The Most The San Joaquin Valley is The Most Depressed Region in the U.S.Depressed Region in the U.S.
Copyright, the Fresno BeeCopyright, the Fresno BeeRJIRJI
PovertyPoverty
More than one in five San Joaquin Valley More than one in five San Joaquin Valley residents live in povertyresidents live in poverty
Poverty rate is more than twice the State averagePoverty rate is more than twice the State average Per capita income is 32% less than State averagePer capita income is 32% less than State average
Copyright, the Fresno BeeCopyright, the Fresno BeeRJIRJI
Health CareHealth Care
140 Physicians per 100,000 population 140 Physicians per 100,000 population compared to 270 state averagecompared to 270 state average
One in six Valley residents does not have One in six Valley residents does not have health insurancehealth insurance
Epidemic respiratory, diabetes, substance Epidemic respiratory, diabetes, substance abuse and teen pregnancy problemsabuse and teen pregnancy problems
Copyright, the Fresno BeeCopyright, the Fresno BeeRJIRJI
Air QualityAir Quality EPA has declared the Valley an EPA has declared the Valley an “extreme “extreme
non-attainment zone”non-attainment zone” Currently # 2, the Valley is expected to be Currently # 2, the Valley is expected to be
#1 in #1 in worst air qualityworst air quality in the nation by in the nation by year-end.year-end.
About About 2/3 of pollutants2/3 of pollutantsresult from conditions result from conditions outside the region’s controloutside the region’s control
Copyright, The Fresno BeeCopyright, The Fresno Bee
RJIRJI
EducationEducation
One third of students drop outOne third of students drop out, ,
almost twice the State average
Almost 60% of unemployment claimants
have no high school degree or GED
Percentage obtaining Bachelor’s degree Percentage obtaining Bachelor’s degree
is about half the state averageis about half the state average
RJIRJI
CrimeCrime Crime Rates higher than California AverageCrime Rates higher than California Average
Statewide Crime Rate - 3,948/100,000 Statewide Crime Rate - 3,948/100,000 (2002 FBI Data)(2002 FBI Data)
Fresno County - 6,112 Tulare Co - 5,052Fresno County - 6,112 Tulare Co - 5,052
Stanislaus Co - 5,954 Merced Co. - 5,040Stanislaus Co - 5,954 Merced Co. - 5,040
Felony Arrests per 100,000 in Central Valley run Felony Arrests per 100,000 in Central Valley run
50%-70% higher than State average50%-70% higher than State average
3 of the top 5 Metro areas in the U.S. for Auto 3 of the top 5 Metro areas in the U.S. for Auto
Thefts are in the Central ValleyThefts are in the Central Valley
Central Valley considered meth capital of U.S.Central Valley considered meth capital of U.S.RJIRJI
Unemployment in CaliforniaUnemployment in California14.0%
6.7%
6.5%
3.9%
5.7%
4.2%
7.1%
6.9%
Central ValleyRegion
Bay Area
Los AngelesCounty
Orange County
Inland Empire
San Diego County
All other Counties
Statewide Total
Regional Economies Project
Annual Unemployment Rate - 2003Annual Unemployment Rate - 2003
14.8%
12.6%
14.2%
14.6%
15.5%
12.3%
0 5 10 15 20
Merced
Madera
Fresno
Kings
Tulare
Kern
%
Regional Economies Project
Unemployment Rates for Unemployment Rates for San Joaquin Valley MSA’sSan Joaquin Valley MSA’s
Metropolitan AreaMetropolitan Area RankRank RateRate
Stockton-LodiStockton-Lodi 320320 10.1%10.1%
ModestoModesto 324324 11.5%11.5%
BakersfieldBakersfield 325325 12.3%12.3%
FresnoFresno 328328 14.0%14.0%
MercedMerced 329329 14.8%14.8%
Visalia-Tulare-PortervilleVisalia-Tulare-Porterville 330330 15.5%15.5%
**2003 Annual Average Rankings (331 total MSA’s), U.S. Dept. of Labor2003 Annual Average Rankings (331 total MSA’s), U.S. Dept. of LaborRJIRJI
15.2%
31.6%
14.6%
11.2%
8.2%
28.7%
25.2%
25.0%
24.9%
20.5%
16.4%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Sacramento
Sierra
Border
N. Sacramento
Valley
Coast
U.S.
N. California
California
Bay Area
SoCal
(Percent Change)
Growth in Total Jobs 1990-2003Growth in Total Jobs 1990-2003
Regional Economies Project
4.9% 4.2% 4.8%
13.6%
24.9%
14.6%
-0.2%
17.4%
-2.1%
16.4%
-1.2%
13.1%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1990-1994 1994-2000 2000-2003 1990-2003
(Pe
rce
nt
Ch
an
ge
)
San Joaquin Valley California U.S.
Growth in Total JobsGrowth in Total Jobs
Regional Economies Project
$21,317
$22,982
$23,188
$23,785
$30,135
$30,269
$30,413
$30,467
$32,950
$45,555
$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000
Valley
No. Sac. Valley
No. California
Central Sierra
Sacramento
SoCal
U.S.
Central Coast
California
Border
Bay Area
Per Capita Income - 2001Per Capita Income - 2001
$32,563
Regional Economies Project
6.1%
5.1%
4.8%
4.6%
4.1%
4.0%
4.0%
3.9%
7.4%
5.3%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8%
Bay Area
San Diego
California
Sacramento
Central Coast
San Joaquin Valley
Northern Sac Valley
Los Angeles
Central Sierra
Northern
(Percent)
Average Wage Growth 1997-2001Average Wage Growth 1997-2001
Regional Economies Project
0.7
9.1
11.3
13.3
15.0
20.9
21.6
22.4
34.9
56.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
All Government
Health Care & Social Assistance
Retail Trade
Accommodation & Food Svcs.
Administrative & Waste Svcs.
Transportation & Warehousing
Construction
Ag., Forestry, Fishing & Hunting
Other Svcs (Except Public Admin.)
Manufacturing
(Thousands of Jobs)
Job Growth in Leading Industries Job Growth in Leading Industries 1990-20021990-2002
Regional Economies Project
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
(Th
ou
sa
nd
s)
Warehousing & storage
Specialized freight trucking
Couriers
Jobs in Transportation & WarehousingJobs in Transportation & Warehousing
Regional Economies Project
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
(Th
ou
sa
nd
s)
Food manufacturing
Fabricated metal product manufacturing
Transportation equipment manufacturing
Jobs in ManufacturingJobs in Manufacturing
Regional Economies Project
Population Growth TrendsPopulation Growth Trends
Population of 8 San Joaquin counties grew by Population of 8 San Joaquin counties grew by 23.6%23.6% from 1990 to 2000 compared to from 1990 to 2000 compared to 13.8%13.8% StatewideStatewide
San Joaquin Valley population grew by 2.7% San Joaquin Valley population grew by 2.7% from 2000 to 2003 compared to Statewide from 2000 to 2003 compared to Statewide growth of 1.7%growth of 1.7%
For comparison, Los Angeles County grew For comparison, Los Angeles County grew 1.6%,1.6%, Orange County grew Orange County grew 1.4%,1.4%, and San Francisco a and San Francisco a negative negative (0.2%)(0.2%)
RJIRJI
Neglect from State GovernmentNeglect from State Government
Highway fundingHighway funding by lane mile lowest in the State by lane mile lowest in the State
School fundingSchool funding is $247 per pupil below State is $247 per pupil below State Avg.Avg.
Medicare reimbursement ratesMedicare reimbursement rates are lowest in the are lowest in the StateState
Severe under-funding of mandated Severe under-funding of mandated child welfarechild welfare servicesservices
Severe under-equity position in Severe under-equity position in judicial positionsjudicial positionsRJIRJI
State Appointments toState Appointments toBoards & Commissions Boards & Commissions (June 15, 2004)(June 15, 2004)
Of 37 members of the California Commission for Of 37 members of the California Commission for Jobs and Economic Growth, Jobs and Economic Growth, only oneonly one is from the is from the San Joaquin Valley San Joaquin Valley
Appointees to the other 34 most significant boards Appointees to the other 34 most significant boards and commissions:and commissions:– Los Angeles CountyLos Angeles County 7878– Bay AreaBay Area 6363– San DiegoSan Diego 1818– San Joaquin ValleySan Joaquin Valley 1616
RJIRJI
Why this mattersWhy this mattersto all Californiansto all Californians
Social reasonsSocial reasons High cost to all taxpayers: unemployment benefits, High cost to all taxpayers: unemployment benefits,
social services, health care.social services, health care. Cost to our justice system: hopelessness leads to Cost to our justice system: hopelessness leads to
crime and chemical dependencycrime and chemical dependency The unemployed do not contribute to the State’s The unemployed do not contribute to the State’s
tax basetax base High ROI potentialHigh ROI potential
RJIRJI
Regional ActionRegional Action
Central California Economic Development Central California Economic Development CorporationCorporation
Valley Workforce Director’s Assn.Valley Workforce Director’s Assn.
Valley Welfare Director’s Assn.Valley Welfare Director’s Assn.
Great Valley CenterGreat Valley Center
City and County AssociationsCity and County Associations
Air DistrictAir District
Industry Cluster GroupsIndustry Cluster Groups
Health Care InitiativesHealth Care Initiatives
Pursuit of a UC Medical school for the San Pursuit of a UC Medical school for the San
Joaquin ValleyJoaquin Valley
Pursuit of pilot accreditation programs for Fresno Pursuit of pilot accreditation programs for Fresno
State in specialty medical areasState in specialty medical areas
Consortium formed to address occupational Consortium formed to address occupational
training for health caretraining for health care
RJIRJI
Operation Clean AirOperation Clean Air
Clean Air Action Plan involving all sectors of the Clean Air Action Plan involving all sectors of the economy and all pollution sources, developed with economy and all pollution sources, developed with active community involvementactive community involvement
Unified support for an “Air Quality Empowerment Unified support for an “Air Quality Empowerment Zone” (modeled on Economic Empowerment Zone” (modeled on Economic Empowerment Zones) seen as the way to facilitate and finance Zones) seen as the way to facilitate and finance implementation of these plansimplementation of these plans
RJIRJI
Federal Government CommitmentFederal Government Commitment
Federal Interagency Task Force for the Central Federal Interagency Task Force for the Central Valley of CA Valley of CA
Supporting regional economic Development efforts Supporting regional economic Development efforts to attract and develop business to attract and develop business
Receptive to “Air Quality Empowerment Zone” Receptive to “Air Quality Empowerment Zone”
It’s not $20 billionIt’s not $20 billion ( (Appalachian Regional Appalachian Regional Commission), Commission), but it’s a startbut it’s a start
RJIRJI
Suggested Actions by the StateSuggested Actions by the State
Create a State Inter-Agency Task Force for the San Create a State Inter-Agency Task Force for the San Joaquin ValleyJoaquin Valley
– Coordinate with local government and the Federal Coordinate with local government and the Federal Inter-Agency Task ForceInter-Agency Task Force
– Pattern after Federal Task ForcePattern after Federal Task Force One or more designees from each Executive Branch One or more designees from each Executive Branch
DepartmentDepartment Lead Agency: Business, Transportation and HousingLead Agency: Business, Transportation and Housing Senior staff representative appointed by the Governor as task Senior staff representative appointed by the Governor as task
force coordinatorforce coordinator
Suggested ActionsSuggested Actions (con’t)(con’t)
Support legislative changeSupport legislative change– Amend or repeal anti-business legislation Amend or repeal anti-business legislation
Workers compWorkers comp Family Leave ActFamily Leave Act Overtime RulingOvertime Ruling AB 975AB 975
Recommend modifications of funding formulas, issuance Recommend modifications of funding formulas, issuance of funding preferences and granting of waivers for areas of funding preferences and granting of waivers for areas with “chronic unemployment”with “chronic unemployment”– Through Executive OrdersThrough Executive Orders– Through legislative actionThrough legislative action
AB 975AB 975 Manufacturer’s Investment CreditManufacturer’s Investment Credit
Suggested Actions Suggested Actions (con’t)(con’t)
Support efforts to retain businesses in California, citing Support efforts to retain businesses in California, citing the Central Valley as an alternative to leaving the Statethe Central Valley as an alternative to leaving the State
Increase appointments to Key Boards and Increase appointments to Key Boards and
CommissionsCommissions
Fund Infrastructure improvements on a proportionate Fund Infrastructure improvements on a proportionate level to the rest of the Statelevel to the rest of the State
Recommend actions to raise Valley K-12 funding to Recommend actions to raise Valley K-12 funding to State averageState average
Use the Valley as a “test-bed” for fast-tracking Use the Valley as a “test-bed” for fast-tracking recommendations of Performance Review Boardrecommendations of Performance Review Board
Suggested ActionsSuggested Actions (con’t)(con’t)
Support San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Support San Joaquin Valley Air Quality
Empowerment Zone Empowerment Zone
Support Construction of a U.C. Med Support Construction of a U.C. Med
School and Medical Research CenterSchool and Medical Research Center
Support granting authority for CSUs to Support granting authority for CSUs to
grant professional and applied doctoratesgrant professional and applied doctorates
Partner with Regional EDC’s to market CAPartner with Regional EDC’s to market CARJIRJI
DiscussionDiscussion
Economic Vitality ConversationToday’s Focus
1. What state actions will have the most immediate positive impact on California’s economic recovery?
2. What state actions will result in the most significant long-term improvement to California’s economic competitiveness and comparative advantage?
3. How do we best structure an effective partnership between the regions and the state around economic strategy?