welcome the carnegie project on the education doctorate october 2011 convening
DESCRIPTION
Welcome The Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate October 2011 Convening. CPED New Member Orientation. When? CPED Bi-annual Convenings Signature activity of Carnegie Foundation programs Central feature=coming together. Mix of Pedagogies. Idea Centered. CPED Convening. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
CPED New Member Orientation8:30-9:00am Breakfast
9:00am WelcomeDavid Imig and Jill Perry, CPED
9:20am Introduction activity—Ask Me AboutMichael Neel, CPED
10:00am The PI talkSharon Ryan, Rutgers University
10:45am Utilizing Critical Friends & Contribution to the CauseValerie Storey, Lynn University & Rick McCown, Duquesne University
11:00am Group questions with Members of the CPED Executive Committee Steve Staples (W&M), Sharon Brown-Welty (CSU-Fresno), Debby Zambo (Arizona State University), Susan Wunder (University of Nebraska), Valerie Storey, (Lynn University), and Jane Jensen (University of Kentucky)
11:45am Lunch
1:00pm Convening
When? CPED Bi-annual Convenings
Signature activity of Carnegie Foundation programs Central feature=coming together
CPED Convenin
g
Idea Centered Mix of Pedagogies
Multiple Voices
High Expectations
Unstructured Conversations
The Carnegie Project on theEducation Doctorate
• Common Commitment to Distinguishing and Differentiating Between the Doctorates in Education (142 Colleges & Universities)
• Research Scholars vs. Scholarly Practitioners• Practical and Narrative Knowledge vs. Analytic Knowledge
• Guided by a Set of Shared Principles
• Work Based on a Shared Language (Shulman)• Capstones and Decathlons and Signature Pedagogies• Work funded by the Carnegie Foundation
The Professionalization Project
Strengthening Professions by Strengthening Doctoral
Education
Fostering theStewardship of a Profession
vis a vis Stewardship of a Discipline
Lee S. Shulman
Why the Professional Practice Doctorate (PPD)?
• Dissatisfaction with the PhD for Practitioners (Lack of Fit, TCD, Cost-Benefits)• Need for a More Practice Oriented Degree• Need for Alignment with NBPTS Certification• New Focus on Clinical Practice (NCATE)• Alignment with Other ProfDs in Graduate Schools
& Professional Schools (DSW Clinical, DM, PsyD, DPT)• Competition from Alternative Providers
• Directed at Real Problems and Real Solutions• Emphasis is on Preparing Transformational
Leaders to Change Schools and Colleges & Other Learning Organizations• Enabling Doctoral Programs to Meet the Needs of
Practitioners (Part Time Students with Full Time Responsibilities)• Doing So in a Rigorous, Responsible, Practical,
Transparent, and Ethical Manner
Ed.D. = The Degree of Choice
Getting to know you…. Michael Neel
TELL ME ABOUT…• your name
• your program
TELL ME ABOUT… three words that describe
your EdD program redesign
After one person goes, the other person says TELL ME
ABOUT...
Each person must share in 90 seconds or less.
CPED MembershipPhase I Members Continuing = 22
Arizona State University, California State Fresno, Duquesne University, Lynn University, Northern Illinois University, Rutgers University, The College of William & Mary, University of Central Florida, University of Colorado-Denver, University of Connecticut, University of Houston, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, University of Maryland, University of Missouri-Columbia, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, University of Oklahoma, University of Vermont, University Southern California, Virginia Commonwealth University, Virginia Tech, Washington State University
Additional CSUs= 8
Long Beach, Fullerton, Pomona, San Diego, San Marcos, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Bernardino
2nd Wave= 27
Baylor University, Boston College, Florida State University, Fordham University,
Illinois State University, Indiana University, Kansas State University, North Carolina State University, North Dakota State University, NYU Steinhardt, Portland State University, Texas Southern University, Texas Tech University, University of Akron, University of Alabama, University of Alaska Anchorage, University of Arkansas, University of Dayton, University of Hawaii, University of Idaho, University of Massachusetts Amherst, University of Mississippi, University of Missouri, University of Pittsburgh, University of San Francisco, University of Tennessee, Kent State University
Total = 57
Expanding Our Impact
• To welcome & incorporate 27 new member institutions
Goal
• To continue our dialogue about the Ed.D.
Goal • To further
develop our notions of Clinical Practice
Goal
• To begin developing Networked
Improvement Communities
Goal
Wednesday1:00pm Welcome - Silver Maple Ballroom
Dean Fayneese Miller, UVMDavid Imig & Jill Perry, CPED
1:15-2:00pm Introductions: Only Child
2:00-4:00pm How To Panels—30 minute Rotations Incorporating CPED Principles –Val Storey (Lynn Univ), Jeni Hart (Missouri-Col), Susan Wunder (Nebraska-Lincoln) Designing Capstones— Rick McCown (Duquesne Univ), Henry Clark and Charol Shakeshaft (Virginia Commonwealth), Lori Mueller (Research Fellow), Deidre Reid-Thomas (Research Fellow), Jaime Stacy (Research Fellow) Role of Inquiry—Debby Zambo (Arizona State Univ), Jane Jensen (Kentucky), Anysia Mayer (Connecticut) Designing Labs of Practice— Teresa Wasonga (Northern Illinois U) Sharon Brown-Welty (CSU-Frenso), Nancy Shanklin, (Colorado-Denver)
3:30pm Break
4:00pm Presentation: University of Vermont - College of Education and Social Services
5:30pm Cocktail reception- Sugar Maple Ballroom
6:30, 6:45, & 7:00pm
Bus Transportation from Davis Center to SheratonDinner on your own
Only Child Prompts- Michael Neel
If different than your program: “Interesting.”
If similar to your program: Men: “No, no, I am your bro.” Women: “what’s this, I’m your sis.”
Then explain the similarity.
Incorporating CPED Principles –Val Storey (Lynn Univ), Jeni Hart (Missouri-Col), Susan Wunder (Nebraska-Lincoln) Designing Capstones— Rick McCown (Duquesne Univ), Henry Clark and Charol Shakeshaft (Virginia Commonwealth), Lori Mueller (Research Fellow), Deidre Reid-Thomas (Research Fellow), Jaime Stacy (Research Fellow) Role of Inquiry—Debby Zambo (Arizona State Univ), Jane Jensen (Kentucky), Anysia Mayer (Connecticut) Designing Labs of Practice— Teresa Wasonga (Northern Illinois U) Sharon Brown-Welty (CSU-Frenso), Nancy Shanklin, (Colorado-Denver)
HOW TO PANELS30 MINUTE ROTATIONS
Thursday7:45, 8:00, & 8:15am
Bus Transportation from Sheraton to Davis Center(Note: we will be leaving for dinner from the convening—dinner is business casual dress—no jeans, t-shirts or shorts)
8:30am Continental Breakfast – Sugar Maple Ballroom
9:00am Clinical Faculty Discussion Rick Sawyer, Washington State University, Grant Hayes, University of Central Florida, Marsha Levine, NCATEDavid Imig, CPED
10:15am Break
10:30am How do we go about program assessment?Debby Zambo, Arizona State University, Robert Rueda, University of Southern California, Sharon Brown-Welty, California State University – Fresno, Robert Gabriner, San Francisco State University
12:00 pm Lunch- Sugar Maple Ballroom
1:15- 1:45pm FIPSE Research UpdateJill Perry, CPED, Deidre Reid-Thomas, CPED Research Fellow, Lynn University, Lori Mueller, CPED Research Fellow, Univ of Missouri-Columbia, Jaime Stacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Ed Crowe, External Evaluator for FIPSE Grant
1:45- 2:30pm Break & New member video Poster Session
2:30-5:00pm Learning from each other—Incorporating new membersInterviews with top three mentor institutions
5:15 pm Bus Transportation from Davis Ctr. To Burlington Country Club
Evening Reception & Dinner at the Burlington Country Club (note: dress is business casual)
8:30 pm Bus Transportation from Burlington Country Club to Sheraton
CLINICAL PRACTICE &
Rick Sawyer, Washington State UniversityMarsha Levine, NCATEDavid Imig, CPED
Sit with your FRUIT
How do we go about program assessment?
Debby Zambo, Arizona State University, Robert Rueda, University of Southern California, Sharon Brown-Welty, California State University – Fresno, Robert Gabriner,
San Francisco State University
SEATING:Ed Leadership 1-10
Higher Ed/Organizational leadership 11-15Teacher leadership 16-20
Working Principles for the Professional Practice Doctorate in Education
The Professional doctorate in education:1. Is framed around questions of equity, ethics, and social justice
to bring about solutions to complex problems of practice.2. Prepares leaders who can construct and apply knowledge to
make a positive difference in the lives of individuals, families, organizations, and communities.
3. Provides opportunities for candidates to develop and demonstrate collaboration and communication skills to work with diverse communities and to build partnerships.
4. Provides field-based opportunities to analyze problems of practice and use multiple frames to develop meaningful solutions.
5. Is grounded in and develops a professional knowledge base that integrates both practical and research knowledge, that links theory with systemic and systematic inquiry.
6. Emphasizes the generation, transformation, and use of professional knowledge and practice.
CPED-FIPSE research agenda = documenting change
• Document and evaluate change in the organizational structures of graduate schools to accommodate new professional practice degrees for school and college leaders. (Institution)
• Document and evaluate change in the signature learning processes, learning environments, and patterns of engagement of faculty and candidates in Ed.D. programs that participate in CPED. (Program and individual)
• Document and evaluate fidelity to the set of guiding principles developed in Phase I. (Program)
• Disseminate lessons learned and best practices for the design and implementation of professional practice degrees to a new cohort of graduate schools of education. (Field)
CPED-FIPSE Research Update
Larger Study Spring 2012
Call for Researchers Oct-Nov 2011
3 Pilot Studies– Research &
Critical Feedback
Site Pre-Visit Questionnaire
*External Evaluation
Two hats– What did we learn?
CPED member/ FIPSE Researcher
• Experiencing another member’s program
Ed.D. student/ FIPSE researcher
• Experiencing the research as a current/former student
Receiving a research team… what was THAT like??
MENTOR INSTITUTION TABLE #Arizona State University 1
California State Polytechnic U - Pomona 2
California State University - Fresno 3
California State University - Fullerton 4
California State University - Long Beach 5
California State University - San Bernardino 6
California State University- Sacramento 7
California State University- San Marcos 8
College of William & Mary 9
Duquesne University 10
Lynn University 11
Northern Illinois University 12
Rutgers University 13
San Diego State University 14
San Francisco State University 15
University of Central Florida 16
University of Colorado, Denver 17
University of Connecticut 18
University of Houston 19
University of Kentucky 20
University of Louisville 2
University of Maryland 4
University of Missouri-Columbia A
University of Nebraska-Lincoln B
University of Oklahoma 5
University of Vermont 6
University Southern California C
Virginia Commonwealth University 7
Washington State University D
Friday7:45, 8:00, 8:15am
Bus Transportation from Sheraton to Davis Center
8:30 am Continental Breakfast – Sugar Maple Ballroom
9:00am Follow up & UpdatesJill Perry, CPED
9:30am-11:30am
Developing Networked Improvement Communities in CPEDSetting the Action Plan and BenchmarksRick McCown, Duquesne University
11:30am Closing Remarks & “Grab & Go” Snack
11:45, 12:00, & 12:15pm
Bus Transportation from Davis Center to Sheraton
*Website*UCEA & AACTE events -UCEA, Saturday -AACTE, Forthcoming -AERA, Forthcoming*Next steps FIPSE: -Call for researcher -Questionnaires*Facebook – Calling all alumni!*Forthcoming publications*2012 Convenings -Fresno and William& Mary* Evaluations
UP
DA
TES
2008 DEED Model
Current:Improvement
Science
McCown & Perry SAC
Bryk et al NIC
PELA
HCEF
HazelwoodEm
pirical Design experim
ents Empi
rical
Des
ign
expe
rimen
t
Statway-CC
Problem-Solution space = democratic engagement
Problem-Solution Space=Network
PDSA Tool
DDS= Investment,
training
High Leverage Problems
• “high leverage” problem, if addressed, would likely leverage other positive
change within the organization.• A central component of a high leverage
problem is that there is agreement across stakeholders that the investment of time, energy and other resources to
address the problem is worthwhile.