Agflcurlur Universif

Office of the xaminations

Faculty : For€stry

Result Sheet : B.Sc.Forestrv. 8"' Semester

Acadernic Year : 2071-072

RollNo.

Research ReportEES 403,3(2+1) GlobalEnvironmental Chanse

SwM 401,3(2+1) Soil S'rrvey andDcgraded Land Mnnagement

PP 401,6(0+6) sM 401, 1(0+1)TCH TCP OGPA

IA TH PR T oh G GP CH CP IA TH PR T G GP CH CP IA TH PR T G GP CH CP IA TH PR T G GP CH CP

104

Gender Issues for Resource Management in the BufIer Zone (A CaseStudy from Rammapur Buffer Zone Community Forest of BardiyaNational Park)

9 32 23 85.33 4 tz 8 32 24 85.33 3 12 t4t 141 94.00 6 23 23 92.00 4 4 li 52 4.00

105An Assessment of the Contribution of Community Forestry irSocioeconomic Upliftment ofPoor and Disadvantaged Groups

23 2l 48 64.00 c 2 7 ll 22 60 80.00 3 72 128 128 85.33 6 24 2l 2l 84.00 4 4 l3 46 3.53

106An Assessment oflncome Generation through NTFPS and Their Impaclon Livelihood olUsers 8 32 22 62 42.67

t2 8 27 22 57 76.00 B 3 3 9 ]]4 lt4 89.33 6 24 22 22 88.00 4 l3 4t) l-76

t0'7Assessmenl of Social Adoption of Scientific Forest Managenent inCommuniD Fo-esr ofNlid H:lls 8 t5 22 65 86.67 3 t2 9 26 22 57 76.00 B 3 3 9 139 r39 92.67 6 24

23 23 92.00 4 4 li t.76

108Species Identification and I-Iabitat Mapping of Chiroplera (A CaseStudy from Kerkha, Jhapa) 2l 22

49 65.13 B 3 l 9 23 21 50 66.67 ll 3 3 9 139 139 92.67 6 24 23 92.00 4 I 13 3.53

109Status, Distfibufion and Flabitat Suitability Mappingof Cycas pectinata;n Chure Range ofMakwanpur Diskict 9 l6 24 69 92.00 3 t2 9 33 2a 67 89.31 3 72 142

14) 94.67 6 24 24 24 96.00 I 4 l3 52 4.00

110Behavioral Study ofBlackbuck and Four Horned Antelope in Ex-situConservation (A Case Sludy lrom Cenlral Zoo Jawalakhel, Lalitpur) 7 3l 22 60 80.00

l t2 9 29 24 62 u2.67 3 12 139 139 92_67 6 24 24 96.00 4 I l3 52 4.00

nl Spatio-temporal Change of Land Use Land Cover and Land Surt-aceTemperature Analysis: Ceospatial Approach 5 l6 21 42 56_00 2 3 20 2l 47 62.67 c 2 3 6 t34 134 89.33 6 l9 l9 76.00 B 1 l3 39 3.00

t12Population Status and Threals on Vulture (A Case Study lieom DailekhDistrict) 8 25 2l 72.00 D l l 8 24 24 56 74.67 B 3 3 9 t3t lil 87.33 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 l l3 46 3.53

113Study of Regeneration Status of Major Tree Species under ScientificFofest Management

7 27 22 56 74.67 B 3 .] I 7 ll 22 60 80.00 3 t2 133 133 88.67 6 24 )2 22 88.00 1 4 l3 49 3.76

114

Contribution olCommunity Forestry in Socio economic Status of Pooland Disadvantage Croups (A Case Study ofRani CFUG in MakwanpulDistrict, Nepal

27 20 53 10.67 B 3 , 8 23 23 5l 72.00 B 3 3 9 131 l3l 87.33 4 6 24 22 22 88.00 4 t 13 46 3.53

115

Implementation Status of Community Forestry Developmenl Cuidelinein the Perspective of Cender Equality and Social InclusionComparalive Study of Two Commun;ly Foresls in ChitwanMakawanpLrr Diskicts)

and8 26 24 5rJ '77.33 B 3 9 28 24 60 80.00 3 1,2 136 136 t0.67 6 24 23 23 92.04 4 t3 49 3_76

I 16Value Chain Analysis of TimUJ (Zanthaxylun arnatum) in Jajaarkot

7 32 22 81.33 4 3 t2 2u 24 8r.33 1,2 137 lt7 9l..ll 4 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 l3 52 4.00

117Assessmenl O.f Status And Habitat Distributioi Of the Hispid Hare(Caprclagus hispidus ) (A Case Study from Parsa National Park)

33 2] 85_33 3 t2 9 2t 2J 6l 8i.33 3 12 136 136 94.61 4 6 23 23 92.00 4 tl 52 4.00

118An Assessment ofEnd Products ofAshwagandha and Their Markelin!Channel in Bhafatpur, Chitwan 32 23 6l 84.00 4 l t2 9 3i 24 88.00 3 12 t38 r38 92.00 6

24 23 23 92.00 4 ll 52 4.00

119An Assessnent of Population Status and Habitat Use of Hog Deer(Axis porcin s )

21 2A 5l 70.67 B 3 3 9 26 2l 55 ?3.33 B 3 3 9 133 1jj 88.67 6 22 22 88.00 4 li l.5l

Controller of Examinations w 44Euuotu-5-i eni*t

r20

Trees Outside Forest: Carbon Slock and Socio-economic Contribution(A Case Study from Banepa Municipality ofKavrepalanchowk District) 8 32 22 62 82.61 3 12 9 tl 23 63 84.00 3 t2 139 139 92.67 6 24 24 24 96.00 I 4 l3 52 4.00

t2lPopulation Status, Habitat Distribution and Conservation Tlueats olWhite Rumped Vulture in Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve l8 20 42 56.00 c 2 3 7 24 2l 52 69.33 B 3 3 9 125 t25 83_31 6 2l 2l 84.00 I Il 3_30

122 Conservalion 9 31 23 63 84.00 l t2 8 23 24 55 '73.33 B 3 3 9 t37 137 91.33 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 I 4 l3 49 3.76

123An Assessment ofcontribution ofcommunity Forest on Livelihood ofUsers (A Case Study ftom Rani Community Forest User Group, 7 26 22 55 73.33 B 3 9 22 23 52 69.33 B 3 3 9 133 133 88.67 4 6 22 22 88.00 I 4 l3 46 3.53

124

Effectiveness ofCommunity Based Ghoral Conservation in MahabharalRange in Nawalpur District (A Case Study ofHupsekot and BungdikaliRural Municipality)

9 33 22 85.33 3 12 9 2a 24 61 81.33 4 3 12 t3'7 li7 91.33 4 24 23 23 92.00 4 I 13 52 4.00

125

Assessment of Status, Distribution and Threats to Gharial (Gdvralrsgdrg€tc r ) (A Case Study from Rapti River of Ch;lwan National Park) 6 3l 22 59 78.67 B l 28 60 80.00 3 t2 140 140 93.33 6 24 23 23 92.00 I 4 13 49 3.16

126

Growing Stock, Biodiversity and Cafbon Est;mation olTree Outside olForest (A Case Study lrom Parwanipur Rural Municipality of BaraDisLr:ct)

7 3l 22 60 80_00 3 12 29 24 81.33 3 12 140 140 93_33 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 13 4.00

r21

Assessmenl of Regenefation Status of Tree Species in Scientificall)Managed Forest (A Case Srudy ol Barahban Collaborative Forest olKailali Dis r'cr of \ep1l

34 2l cl 81.33 3 t2 7 28 2l 58 77.33 u 3 3 9 ti7 137 ,r.t_l 6 24 23 ti 92.00 ll 49 3.16

128An Assessment of Status ofNTFPS, Their Use Values and Harvestin€Practices (A Case Study ofBhulke Community Forcst, Dang Dislrict) 3i 22 6l 84.00 4 3 t2 8 28 22 58 77.33 B 3 3 9 til lil 87.33 6 24 22 22 88.00 1i 49 3.76

129An Assessment of Income Generation thfough NTFPS and Their Roleon Livelihood ofUser (A Case Study from Bhaleni CFUGs) 24 2l 50 66_67 B 3 9 24 20 50 66.67 B 3 3 9 139 r39 92.67 6 24 22 2) 88.00 4 ll i.53

130Economic Valualion ol Ecosystem Services of Mardhar WellandfRulahat Districl. Nepdl) 2t 22 60 80.00 t2 9 29 23 8t.33 3 12 t39 1i9 92.67 6 24 23 23 92.00 li 52 4.00

1.t I

Determination of Industrial Demand and End USES of Razwofiaserperllnd (Sarpagandha), A Case Study fron Siddharlha NagarMunicipalily and Butwal Sub-Metropolitan City ofRupandehi District 8 30 23 81.33 l2 9 29 23 81.33 3 \2 til l.l2 88.00 6 )3 2] 92.00 4 ll 52 4.00

t32Status and Trend Analysis of Illegal Wildlife Trade in KalhmanduVall€y 8 32 63 84.00 3 12 29 24 8r.33 3 72 140 i40 93.33 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 l3 52 4.00

133Assessing Agrolorestry Practices Conkibuling Chure Conservation (ACase Study ofAnlekhgunj, Bara) 9 3l 85-33 t2 8 28 25 cl 8r.33 3 1,2 138 138 92.00 6 24 23 23 92.00 13 52 4.00

t34An Assessment of Market Status of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant:(MAPS) of Makwanpur District 8 30 24 62 82.67 t2 .12 24 85.33 3 t2 r36 136 90.61 6 24 23 23 92.04 13 52 4.00

135

Comparison of Regeneration of S^l (Shorea rabusta) in Sclentificall)Manged Forest (A Case Study irom Mulpani Community Forest User:Group of Nawalparasi District)

5 28 2l 54 72.40 B 3 '7 28 21 i6 14.67 B 3 3 9 133 88.67 6 24 22 22 88.00 4 4 ll 46 3.53

116

Assessment ol Profile Storage ol Soil Organic Cafbon and TotalNitrogen in Forest and Grassland (A Case Study in Kotila Communit)Forest, Jajarkot, Nepal

9 l0 24 6l 84.00 4 l t2 3l 24 64 85.11 3 1,2 139 r39 92.67 6 23 23 92.00 4 t3 52 4.00

r3'7

Comparalive Study of Covernance Status of Two Community ForestUser GrouD ( A Case Slud) oT \,lJyadevi. Female Man"ged and Fulbafi.Male Fleaded Community forest ofSalyan District, Nepal

0.00 I 3 7 0 0.00 o 3 0 1t5 135 90.00 6 24 22 22 88.00 4 l3 28 2.t5

i38An Assessment on Poljcies and Vision Development for Urban Forestryin Helarda Sub-meropoliran 8 3l 24 63 84.00 l t2 28 )5 6r 8r.33 3 12 136 136 90.61 6 24 23 23 92.00 I l3 52 4.00

41.-_t--l ialExanrinations Clrief

139Impact ofClimale Change on Wetland B;fds and Their Habitat (A CaseSrudy from lagadishprf Reseryoir. Kapi vaslu Dislricl. Nepal) 8 2l 22 5l 68.00 B 3 3 8 25 2l 56 74.67 L] 3 3 9 134 134 89.33 6 24 22 22 88.00 I 4 l3 46 t.53

140

People's Perception on Climatic Chan8e, lts lmpacts on WaterResources and Local Adaptation Measures (A Case Study ofBhimphedi Rural Municipality, Makawanpur)

7 2l 23 5l 74.67 B 3 3 8 26 24 58 77.33 B 3 3 9 135 90.00 6 22 22 88.00 4 1 4 t3 3.53

141Assessment of Soil Organic Carbon in Major Agroforestry System (ACase Study lrom Raksjrang Rural Municipality, Makawanpur, Nepal) 33 24 65 86.67 3 t2 32 24 64 85.33 3 1,2 140 140 93.33 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 1 13 52 4.00

r42 1 21 21 55 Ll 3 3 9 7 29 2l 74.67 B 3 3 9 r35 135 90.00 6 22 22 88.00 1 4 13

r43

An Assessment of Inftastructural Deficiency of Tourism SeNices forPromoting Eco{ourism (A Case Sludy ofShuklaphanta National Park) 8 32 22 62 82.67 4 l t2 8 33 22 6l 84.00 3 72 139 139 92.6',1 4 6 23 23 92.O0 4 I 4 13 52 4.00

t44Conhibution of Community Based Forest Micro-enterprise to Improvethe Livelihood ofCommunity Forest Users 8 3l 23 62 42.67 3 t2 7 29 22 58 71.33 B 3 3 9 l3l l3l 87.33 6 22 22 88.00 4 I 4 l3 49 3.76

145

An Assessment olPopuiation Status, Species Interaction and Threats toVulture in Dang Dislrict (A Case Study of Baghmare and KalikaCommunity Foresl)

6 34 2l 81.33 3 12 8 32 23 63 84.00 3 12 t39 ll9 92.67 6 23 23 92.00 I tl 52 4.00

r46Assessment of Awareness and Pa{icipalion of Dalit Women inCommunity Forest Management 5 25 2l 5l 68.00 ll l 29 22 58 77.33 B 3 3 126 126 84.00 24 21 21 84.00 4 ll 3.51

r41

The Role ofNon t;mber Forest Products in Financ;al Capital ol LocalPeople (A Case Sludy of Pujamalika Jadibuti Community Forest inKa i\ol Disrricr)

5 20 22 17 62.61 c 2 l 6 t1 22 6r.13 C 2 3 6 r32 t32 88.00 6 24 21 2l 84.00 4 l3 40 3.47

148Compafal;ve Analysis of Performance of Natuml Regeneration inScientifi cally Managed Community Forest 9 35 23 6l 89.33 l t2 ]I 24 (4 85.i3 12 135 135 90.00 6 23 23 92.00 4 ti 4.00

149Comparison ofRegeneration Status, Mode ofRegeneration and SpeciesDiversity in Natural Sal Forest ofTerai l5 24 68 90.67 3 t2 8 30 24 62 42.67 3 1,2 l4l l4t 94.00 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 ti 52 4.00

t50

Sources of Income, Expenditufe and Their Impact on Communit]Forest User Group (A Case Study ofPiple Pokhara Community Forest) 29 22 59 7u.67 B l l t 29 23 60 80_00 3 t2 126 t26 84.00 6 24 21 )l 84.00 ti 49 l-76

151An Assessment on I'Iuman-monkey (Mdcacd n ldtta ) Conflict and ItManagement in Malushila Rural Munic;pality ofParbat District 29 22 ;7 76.00 B l l 28 23 5t 74.67 B 3 3 9 1i4 ti4 8r..ll 6 24 2i 2i 92.00 4 13 46 1.53

t52Study of Regeneration Status of Major Tree Species under ScientificForest Management 25 22 53 74.61 B l 7 16 22 55 73.33 R 3 3 9 t39 139 92.67 6 24 2) D, 88.00 4 l3 t.5l

153Cl;male lnduced Ouhigralion: Linking Disaster and CommunityPerspective, A case Study from Khaniyapani, Ramechhap ll 24 88.00 t2 9 30 25 65_31 4 3 t2 t38 138 92.00 6 24 24 24 96.00 ti 52 4.00

154Condition of Urban Forestry: A Case Study from Ring Road olKathmandu Metropolitan City 8 32 22 62 82.67 3 12 9 27 25 81.33 3 12 141 141 94_00 6 23 23 92.00 4 4 ll 52 4.00

An Assessment of HumanE)ephant (Elephds na.umur ) Conflict and ItsMiligat;on Measurcs 4 l8 20 42 56.00 C 2 l t9 2l 6r.33 c 2 3 6 129 129 86.00 4 6 24 21 21 84.00 4 l3 40 3.07

156Plant Species Diversity and Regeneration Condition Under ScientificForest Management (A Case Sludy from Kalikote Community Forest of 6 20 23 49 65.33 B 3 6 t7 22 60.00 c 2 3 6 t3'7 137 9r.33 6 22 22 88.00 4 l3 3.30

r51Women Pal1icipation in the Management ofConmunity Forest

'1 33 22 62 82.67 t2 8 30 24 62 a2_67 3 1,2 128 128 85.13 6 24 22 22 88.00 ti 52 4_00

158An Assessment of Slatus Dislribution and Threal.s of Paris palyphylla(SATUWA) in Community Forest 6 l0 22 58 77.33 B l I 28 24 60 80_00 4 3 12 til lil 87.33 6 24 22 22 88.00 4 13 49 3.76

159

Eflecls of Invasive Alien Plant Species on Nalive Flora (A case Studyfrom Bandevi Buffer Zone Community Forest ol Chitwan NationalPark)

8 28 24 60 80.00 t2 8 28 24 60 80.00 3 12 t37 13',] 91.33 6 23 2i 92.00 4 ll 52 4.00

-----:-\- -Exarn ns Chie

enntroller of Examinations(9rr-

r60 9 33 zl 65 86.67 3 12 9 ll 15 61 89.33 3 12 139 139 92.61 6 24 24 24 96.00 I t3 524_00

161

Status and Effect ol Invasive Alien Plant Species on Forest (A CaseStudy ftom Jyamire Buffer Zone Community Forest, Parsa NationalPark. Nepal)

9 30 23 62 82.67 4 3 t2 30 25 6l 84.00 3 12 13',7 t3'7 91_33 6 24 22 22 88.00 I 4 IJ 52 4.00

t62Geospatial Assessment of Flood on Bheemdutta Municipality,Kancharpuf \epal

8 28 23 59 74.67 B 3 9 32 24 65 86.67 3 12 r30 130 86_67 6 22 22 88.00 1 4 l3 3.76

r63

Contribution ol Community Forest in Local Development andLivelihood Improvement in Manakamana Community Foresl, LabandiMunicipality-17, Sarlahi

6 28 20 54 72.00 B 3 27 20 70.67 B 3 3 9 126 t26 84.00 4 6 2t 21 84.00 1 4 ll 46

t64Park-people Conflict in Chitwan National Park (A Case Study ftomMirgakunja Bufler Zone of Ratnanagar Municipality

32 23 6l 84.00 4 3 D. 32 24 85.33 t2 \31 l3'7 9l l3 6 24 23 92.00 I 4 \3 52 4.00

Comparative Study of Selected Soil Properties in Different Land UseTypes (A Case Study in Hetauda Sub-metropolitan City, Makwanpur,Nepal)

3l 2) 62 42.67 3 12 l(l 24 62 81.61 3 12 i:8 138 92.00 6 24 24 24 96.00 4 4 1l 52 4.00

166Contribution ofResin Tapping on Local Economy (A Case Study From

Kalika rhan.l:ka Communiry Fore.r ofMakuanprrr Di)rr:cU8 l(l 23 81.33 12 32 22 62 82.61 3 12 li5 135 90.00 6 23 23 92.00 4 l3 52 4.00

t61An Assessment of Crop Raiding by Greater One-horned Rhinoceros in

Community Forests of Chitwan8 26 24 58 77.33 B l 8 26 24 58 11.13 B 3 3 9 li4 134 89.31 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 l3 46 3.53

168

Land Suitabjlity Anaiysis of Bhyakv (Dioscarea delta lea) $ingGeographic Information System (CIS) A Case Study in KalibedhghariCommun'ry I orest. Phap.rbari Maka$2npuf

9 27 23 59 14.61 B 3 l 9 8 3l 24 63 84.00 I A 3 12 136 136 90.67 6 21 )l 84.00 4 l3 49 3.76

170

Assessing lhe Contribution ofAgfoforestry in Livelihood Improvemenl

of CFUG Membefs (A Case Sludy lrom Thuli CFUG and BhasmePakha CFUG olKavf epalanchok Districq

26 20 50 66.67 3 3 9,l 29 20 56 14.67 B 3 -t^ 123 l2i 82.00 | A 6 2l 2l 84.00 I ll 3.53

t71Status Distribution and Conservation threals ol Asialic rock Python(p),thon molurus) in Buffer Zone Area ofParsa National Park, Nepal

22 2Q 62.67 C 2 3 6 1 23 20 50 66.61 B 3t3 9 25 t25 8l.ll lA 6 24 2l 2l 84.00 I 4 13 | 4l 3.10

112A Geopspatial Approach to Land Suitability Analysis ol HarroSerntinalia chebula)

7 3l 22 60 80.00 4 3 t2 ll 24 6.1 84.00 4t3 12 135 135 90.00 6 24 22 22 88-00 I 4 l3 52 4.00

t73 People's Parlicipation in Community Forest Management 30 22 59'/8.67 B 3

4

I3

It2

I 3332

23 85.33 3 12 131 lil 87..1] 6 24 )2 22 88.00 4 13 49 3.76

24 65 86.67 12 1i8 138 92.00 6 24 23 23 92.04 4 4 l3 52 4.00114Djstribution, Elhnobotanical Uses and Conservat;on Slatus ofPterocatp s marsupium (A Case Study ofHadyali Community Forest,

8 l.l 2) 85.33

t'/ 5Population Status, Distribution and Conservation Threat to Nilgai(Basetaphus tragocamelus) (A Case Study from NAMASTE and B P

6 24 21 5l 68.00 t) 3 9 23 22 52 69.3J B 3 3 9 132 132 88.00 6 22 22 88-00 4 l3 46 3.51

1'76Geospatial Assessment of Flood and DroLlght on the Chure Region 01

Nepai (A Case Study from Butwal, Rupandehi)32 24 65 86.67 3 12 9 32 22 63 84.00 4 3 t2 140 140 91.31 6 )2 22 88.00 4 li 52 4.00

117Status ofcovemanc€ in Community Foresl user Group (A Case Stud)ofsansarimai Communily Forest user Group ofMakawanpur District)

8 ll 22 6l 81.33 4 t2 8 27 22 51 76.00 B 3 3 9 t3t til 87..11 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 l3 49 3.76

t79Dendrochronological Approach to Estimale Diameter and AgeRelationship of Pinus wallichiana (A Case Study lrom Thah.Municipality)

33 25 67 89-31 t2 9 3l 24 85_33 3 12 I40 140 93.33 6 24 23 23 92.00 4 13 52 4.00

180Carbon Stock of Pinus roxburghii and Alnus nepalensis of lleslernRukum

25 2l 52 69-33 B 3 3 9 7 25 2l 53 7A.67 u 3 3 9 t32 132 88.00 6 23 23 92.00 4 1i 46 3.53

t81

Conparative Siudy of Soil Organic Carbon and Nuirient Stalus at aForest and an Agroforest (A Case Study in and around NavajaritiLommunily Forerl. Chil$an Di5lricl. Nepal)

9 32 24 65 86.67 3 l2 9 29 24 62 82.67 3 12 137 t31 9t.ll 6 24 23 23 92.04 I 4 ti 52 4.00

182 Loss ofTimber by Wood Defects (Hollorvness) in Sal Forest ofTerai 9 33 24 66 88.00 3 t2 9 32 24 65 u6.67 3 t2 t40 140 93.11 4 6 2423 2l 92.00 4 I 4 1.1 5_2 4.00

183

Decision Making Role of women in Communhy Forestry (A Cas€Study lrom Manakamana Connrlrnity Forest User Croup, SaflahiDistdct)

29 2l 56 74.67 B 3 3 9 7 26 23 56 74-67 tl 3 3 9 136 t36 90.67 6 24 22 22 88.00 I l3 3.51

w-nsg:--t-

Exanrinatiolrl Chieff^ntrnllcr