week6 slides
TRANSCRIPT
PowerChris Hanretty
1 / 29
Power to versus power over
Power over: a definition
Three dimensions of power
Empirical application
2 / 29
Warnings
Conceptual analysisCriteria for conceptual analysis:clarity, applicability, intelligibility,match with ordinary languageEmpirical issues important butdiscussed at endLinks back to issues of falsification
3 / 29
#1:
Power to versuspower over
4 / 29
Two variants
A has the power to do something. . .versus A has power over BExample of the former: does Chinahave the power to send a man to themoonExample of the former: am Iempowered to stamp documents witha UEA stamp?
5 / 29
Why are we interested inpower over?
Does this sound too conflictual?Very often, the power to do somethingrequires having power over individuals'Power to' without `power over' oftenuninteresting
6 / 29
#2:
Power over: adefinition
7 / 29
An attempt
A has power over B when A hasthe capacity to affect B in amanner contrary to B's interests
Lukes (2005), Power: A Radical View Myparaphrase.
8 / 29
An attempt
A has power over B when A hasthe capacity to affect B in amanner contrary to B's interests
Lukes (2005), Power: A Radical View Myparaphrase.
9 / 29
An attempt
A has power over B when A hasthe capacity to affect B in amanner contrary to B's interests
Lukes (2005), Power: A Radical View Myparaphrase.
10 / 29
An attempt
A has power over B when A hasthe capacity to affect B in amanner contrary to B's interests
Lukes (2005), Power: A Radical View Myparaphrase.
11 / 29
As and Bs
What types of things can slot in for Aand B?Countries? (China has power overNorth Korea)B must at least have interestsDo collective actors have interests?
12 / 29
Capacity and exercise (1)
Brittleness is a capacity, or dispositionBottles have the (negative) capacity tobreak under certain conditions
13 / 29
Capacity and exercise (2)
Power is a capacity, or a dispositionalattributeWe don't walk in to 10 Downing Streetand see the exercise of powerThis causes problems for empiricalresearchImplicit counterfactual: were thisperson to act (cf. were we to throwthe bottle against the wall)
14 / 29
InterestsCompare
A has power over B when A hasthe capacity to affect B in amanner contrary to B's interests(Lukes-esque)
withA has power over B to the extenthe can get B to do something thatB would not otherwise do (Dahl)
15 / 29
Other forms of `causingpeople to act'
PersuasionEncouragementInducementGeneral co-operative endeavour
16 / 29
Power and the powerful
What is it to be powerful?Simply to have power over a widerange of other people,. . .with the capacity to affect them inways that touch on (core) interests oftheirs,. . .and to do so across a range of issues
17 / 29
What problems does thiscause?
We need a (defensible) account ofpeople's interestsWe can take people's preferences asgivenCan or must we go further?
18 / 29
#3:
Threedimensions ofpower
19 / 29
Lukes' PRV
1st dimension: power indecision-making2nd dimension: power of agendacontrol3rd dimension: power to shapeinterests
20 / 29
Decision-making:background
The Yalies (Dahl, Polsby)The Rest (C Wright Mills)What is this Power Elite of which youspeak?
21 / 29
Decision-making: premises
Identify precisely the As and BsIn this case, economic elites versusthe restIdentify conflict between these groupsIdentify decisionsAsk whether A or B got what theywanted
22 / 29
Decision-making: findings
Economic resources in New Havenunequally distributed`Power' distributed in a pluralisticfashion. . .over a range of issues (appointments,housing, education)
23 / 29
Agenda control
The Bachrach and Baratz counter:Some powerful individuals mightprefer certain decisions not to betaken(Presumably they believe that thedecision, if taken, would go againstthem)We have to check which items go onto the agenda
24 / 29
Observing this
This is a point about agenda controlThis is not just a point about formaldecision-making agendas (though ithelps explain why secretaries are morepowerful than we think)it is also a point about the mobilizationof bias and inertia``Yes, of course, we'll talk about thatsoon''
25 / 29
Shaping interests
We've been taking interests at facevalueWhat if people are mistaken abouttheir interestsWhat's the Matter with Kansas?
26 / 29
False consciousnessIf you posit a difference between realand stated interests, anotherdimension opens upThis is the power to shape people'sinterests (away from their realinterests)`Bourgeois morality' and `falseconsciousness'Intuitively helps us make sense of themedia
27 / 29
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt39je8Jbew
28 / 29
#4:
Empiricalapplication
29 / 29
Real interests
Ivory tower much?Are claims about real interests the kindof claims that can be tested?Which named individuals exercise thispower?
30 / 29