week 3 - task 5 - peer review form

2
7/23/2019 Week 3 - Task 5 - Peer Review Form http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/week-3-task-5-peer-review-form 1/2 Peer Review Form – Week 3 - Task 5: GRASP dealing with the Readers/Writer Prolem P!r"ose The Peer Review Form for storyboard task is intended to provide constructive feedback to peers with the intent that getting feedback from peers will be more meaningful and provide insight to others in the class that there are many ways to solve these problems. In this case, the focus is on the key elements to establish effective Use ases. Peer Reviews typically re!uire each student to review code of two peers and two others will peer review the student . "#cept in e#treme cases, students are not asked to peer review each other$s work. If there are an odd number of students, T%s or mentors will fill in for a missing peer reviewer and an e#tra review will be asked to provide a third review of another$s "&'. If the answer to a !uestion is yes, give a mark of (. If the answer is no, give a mark of )ero. "#plain )ero marks in the notes. #ame o$ the st!dent eing eval!ated: Pavan% lakshman% sangamithra #ame o$ the st!dent doing the eval!ating: vina& k!mar% hemahargavi% ram&a Week: * Task #ame: Week 3 - Task 5 – +R%P dealing with the Readers-riters Problem 'ate:(5-)(-(*)5 +val!ation S#o, !estions .) /ark $or ea0h 1!estion2 S0ore #otes (. U/0 1iagrams %ctors and ystem omponents are good to e#cellent 1 2. Responsibilities are good to e#cellent 1 *. olution 0ogic and Flow are good to e#cellent ( 3. olution Technical 1etails are good to e#cellent 1 'os: (. Use appropriate and respectful language for your peers in the notes section  

Upload: pavan-prakashh

Post on 17-Feb-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Week 3 - Task 5 - Peer Review Form

7/23/2019 Week 3 - Task 5 - Peer Review Form

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/week-3-task-5-peer-review-form 1/2

Peer Review Form – Week 3 - Task 5: GRASP dealing with the Readers/Writer ProlemP!r"ose

The Peer Review Form for storyboard task is intended to provide constructive feedback to peers with the intent that getting

feedback from peers will be more meaningful and provide insight to others in the class that there are many ways to solve

these problems.

In this case, the focus is on the key elements to establish effective Use ases.

Peer Reviews typically re!uire each student to review code of two peers and two others will peer review the student . "#cept ine#treme cases, students are not asked to peer review each other$s work. If there are an odd number of students, T%s ormentors will fill in for a missing peer reviewer and an e#tra review will be asked to provide a third review of another$s "&'.

If the answer to a !uestion is yes, give a mark of (. If the answer is no, give a mark of )ero. "#plain )ero marks in thenotes.

#ame o$ the st!dent eing eval!ated: Pavan% lakshman% sangamithra

#ame o$ the st!dent doing the eval!ating: vina& k!mar% hemahargavi% ram&a

Week: *

Task #ame: Week 3 - Task 5 – +R%P dealing with the Readers-riters Problem'ate:(5-)(-(*)5

+val!ation

S#o, !estions .) /ark $or ea0h 1!estion2 S0ore #otes

(. U/0 1iagrams %ctors and ystem omponents are good

to e#cellent

1

2. Responsibilities are good to e#cellent 1

*. olution 0ogic and Flow are good to e#cellent (

3. olution Technical 1etails are good to e#cellent 1

'os:(. Use appropriate and respectful language for your peers in the notes section

 

Page 2: Week 3 - Task 5 - Peer Review Form

7/23/2019 Week 3 - Task 5 - Peer Review Form

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/week-3-task-5-peer-review-form 2/2

Peer Review Form – Week 3 - Task 5: GRASP dealing with the Readers/Writer Prolem2. riti!ue the performance and behavior and not the person

*. omment only if adds value to the peer$s performance

3. Focus on specific problem areas 4This is re!uired when you give a mark of )ero.5

6. If your peer doesn$t agree then be open for a discussion to resolve the conflict

'onts:

(. 1on$t be vague in your feedback. %void writing-saying 7I didn$t get the point or I didn$t understand8. Rather say 

which parts of the e#planation was not clear in terms of language, content, tone etc.

2. 1on$t argue

*. 1on$t focus on irresolvable !uestions-traits all the time 4If a peer has a bad temper don$t keep saying that. Rather 

look for ways to help him-her overcome it5

3. 1on$t vent your frustrations

6. 1on$t try to resolve other team issues-personal issues through the form. 4If re!uired talk in person and resolve it.5