weed management in horticultural crops - owl...for onion trailbazer, no damage was found 20 da-pre...

Horticulture and Crop Science

Series No. 840

Weed Management In Horticultural Crops

RESEARCH RESULTS

2015

Douglas J. Doohan Rick Edwards

Department of Horticulture and Crop Science The Ohio State University

Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Ohio State Extension

i

This report contains the results of research on horticultural crop weed management in Ohio for 2015. This report and other resources are available on the Internet at: www.owl.edu This bulletin does not constitute endorsement or specific recommendations. Apology is expressed for any inadvertent errors found in this report. Final copies of commercial advertisement that will contain data from these results are subject to the author’s approval before publication. All publications of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center are available to clientele without regard to race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, gender, age, disability or Vietnam-era veteran status.

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... iii

Bayer Crop and Rating Codes........................................................................................................... v

Weed List and Codes ...................................................................................................................... vii

Chemical and Adjuvant List ........................................................................................................... viii

Bicyclopyrone in Carrot and Onion in a Clay Soil ........................................................................... 1

Bicyclopyrone in Carrot and Onion in Muck Soil ........................................................................... 6

Burndown Herbicides for Plastic Cover in Vegetable Production ................................................ 10

Burndown Herbicides Prior to Planting in Fallow Ground ............................................................ 15

Crop Safety in 6 Processing Tomato Varieties Using Authority MTZ ............................................ 20

Effect of Sulfentrazone on Growth of Fall Planted Apples ........................................................... 26

Evalutation of New Herbicides for Weed Control in Sweet Corn ................................................. 32

IR-4 Performance of Clopyralid in Dry Bulb Onion ....................................................................... 42

Multiflora Rose Control in Pasture with AIM................................................................................ 46

Plant Back Trial of Authority MTZ Applied at the Previous Season in Vegetables ....................... 53

Pumpkin - Response of Four Varieties to Clomozone .................................................................. 58

Raspberry - Response of Raspberry to POST Directed Herbicide Tankmixes ............................... 62

Raspberry – Treevix in Control of Weeds and Burndown of Primocanes .................................... 68

Sweet Corn - Crop Safety of Anthem ATZ ..................................................................................... 79

Tomato- Performance of Authority MTZ Applied in Fall and Spring ............................................ 85

iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Special acknowledgement and thanks are due to the following individuals who made this work a success:

Experiment Stations

Muck Crops Agric. Res. Station, Willard – Robert Filbrun and Staff

North Central Agric. Res. Station, Fremont – Matt Hofelich and Staff Dept. Farm Manager, OARDC/OSU – Bruce Williams and Staff

Dept. Farm Manager, OARDC/OSU – Lynn F. Ault and Staff

Research Associates

Dr. Roger Downer Rick Edwards

Graduate Students

Yin Chen, Katie Linder, Chengsong Hu

Post-Doctoral Researcher

Dr. Mohsen Mohseni-Moghadam

Visiting Scholars

Pia Beatriz Arismendi, Louceline Fleuridor, Allison Penate

iv

Special acknowledgement and thanks are due to the following companies for their support of the Fruit and Vegetable Weed Research Program, Department of Horticulture and Crop Science,

OARDC/The Ohio State University.

American Berry Cooperative

BASF Ag Products

Bayer CropScience

Buurma Farms, Inc.

Dow AgroSciences LLC

E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

FMC Corporation

Harris Seed Company

IR-4 Program

Maurer Farms

Moreland Fruit Farm

OARDC Research Enhancement Program – Competitive Grants

Ohio Dept. of Agriculture, Specialty Crop Block Program

Ohio Vegetable & Small Fruit Research & Development Program

Ohio Grape Industry Committee

Siegers Seed Co.

Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.

Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc.

USDA NIFA

Wiers Farm Inc.

v

LIST OF CROP BAYER CODES USED IN THIS REPORT:

AGRASS* = Annual grasses LYPES = Tomato MABSD = Apple RUBID = Red raspberry RUBOC = Black raspberry RUBSG = Brambles (raspberries and blackberries) VACMY = Blackberry ZEAMX = Sweet corn * not official Bayer Code.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS USED IN THIS REPORT:

AVE = Average BURN = Necrotic tissue CHLOROSIS = Yellow coloration or bleaching of foliage CONTROL = Herbicide efficacy DAT= Days after treatment DOR = Dormant DIAM = Diameter GROWTH = Annual increase in length of shoot INJURY = Composite assessment of stunting, chlorosis, and other visible effects MKTB = Marketable fruit MSP = Mid-spring NO = Number OZ = Ounces POST = Post-emergent application POSTTP = Post-transplant PRE = Pre-emergent application PRETP = Pre-transplant RACOBL = Randomized Complete Block Design UNMKTB = Unmarketable fruit; green (tomatoes), diseased or cull WAT = Weeks after treatment METHODS OF ASSESSING CROP INJURY, WEED CONTROL, AND DENSITY: Unless otherwise stated, crop injury and weed control were assessed visually. The 0-100 linear scale was used, in which 0 = no crop injury/no control, and 100 = death of crop/complete weed control. For weed density: LOW = Scattered, just a few weeds MEDIUM = 1 weed per 3 feet of row HIGH = More than 1 weed per 3 feet of row METEORLOGICAL DATA: Meteorological Data for each research station may be found at www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/newweather/

vi

A LIST OF WEEDS WITH BAYER CODES USED IN THIS REPORT:

BAYER CODE COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME

ABUTH velvetleaf Abutilon theophrasti Medicus

ACCVI Virginia copperleaf Acalypha virginica L.

AGGRE quackgrass Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski

AMABL prostrate pigweed Amaranthus blitoides S. Wats.

AMARE redroot pigweed Amaranthus retroflexus L.

AMAXX pigweed spp. Amaranthus spp.

AMBEL common ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.

AMBTR giant ragweed Ambrosia trifida L.

CAGSE hedge bindweed Calystegia sepium (L.) R. Br.

CAPBP shepherd’s purse Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medicus

CARHI hairy bittercress Cardamine pratensis L.

CERVU mouseear chickweed Cerastium vulgatum L.

CHEAL common lambsquarters Chenopodium album L.

CIRAR Canada thistle Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.

CYAOV Shagbark hickory Carya ovata (MILL) K.KOCH

CYPES yellow nutsedge Cyperus esculentes L.

DACGL orchardgrass Dactylis glomerata L.

DAUCA wild carrot Daucus carota L.

DIGSA large crabgrass Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.

GLEHE ground ivy Glechoma hederacea L.

MALNE common mallow Malva neglecta Wallr.

OXAST yellow woodsorrel Oxalis stricta L.

PANDI fall panicum Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.

PLALA buckhorn plantain Plantago lanceolata L.

PLAMA broadleaf plantain Plantago major L.

POANN annual bluegrass Poa annua L.

POLPY Pennsylvania smartweed Polygonum pensylvanicum L.

POROL common purslane Portulaca oleracea L.

PRTQU Virginia creeper Parthenocissus quinquifolia (L.) Planch.

RORIS marsh yellowcress Rorippa islandica L.

vii

RUBFR bramble Rubus fruticosis L.

RUMOB broadleaf dock Rumex obtusifolius L.

SETFA giant foxtail Setaria faberii L.

SENVU common groundsel Senecio vularis L.

SOLPT Eastern black nightshade Solanum ptycanthum Dun.

SOOCA Canada goldenrod Solidago canadensis L.

STEME common chickweed Stellaria media (L.) Vill

TAROF dandelion Taraxacum officinale Weber in

Wiggers

TOXRA poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans (L.) Ktze.

TRFPR red clover Trifolium pratense L.

TRFRE white clover Trifolium repens L.

viii

HERBICIDE LIST

TRADE NAME COMMON NAME FORM MANUFACTURER

AIM carfentrazone 2 EC FMC Corporation

Alion indaziflan 200 SL Bayer CropScience

Anthem ATZ atrizine 4 SC FMC Corporation

Authority MTZ sulfentrazone and metribuzin 45 WG FMC Corporation

Bicyclopyrone N/A 200 L Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.

Command 3ME clomozone 3 ME

Dual Magnum s-metolachlor 7.62 EC Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.

Emerion 7000 Ammonium Nonanoate 40 L Emery Oleochemicals

Gramoxone paraquat dichloride 2L Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.

Karmex diuron 80 DF Griffin LLC

MAT-28 N/A 50 SG DuPont Crop Protection

Matrix rimsulfuron 25 DF DuPont Crop Protection

Prowl H2O pendimethalin 3.8 L BASF Ag Products

Pursuit Imazethapyr 2L BASF Corporation

Reflex fomesafen 2L Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.

Rely 280 glufosinate ammonium 200 SL Bayer CropScience

Roundup PowerMax

glyphosate 4.5 L Monsanto Company

Sandea halosulfuron-methyl 75 DF Gowan Company

Select clethodim 2 L Valent U.S.A. Corp. Agr. Products Sencor metribuzin 75 DF Bayer CropScience

Sinbar terbacil 80 WP Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc.

Spartan sulfentrazone 75 DF FMC Corporation

Stinger clopyralid 3 L Dow AgroSciences LLC Strategy ethalfluralin+clomozone 2.1 L Loveland Products, Inc. Surflan oryzalin 4L Dow AgroSciences LLC

Treevix saflufenacil 70 WG BASF Ag Products

Weedone LV4 2, 4 -D ester 3.8 EC NuFarm

ADJUVANT LIST NAME ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION

Ammonium sulfate AMS Spray grade fertilizer

Crop Oil Concentrate COC Paraffin base petroleum oil

Induce NIS Nonionic surfactant

MSO MSO Methylated seed oil

28% N UAN Urea ammonia nitrate

Jan-13-2016 (07152015YC-4 onion mineral) ARM 2014.7 Site Description Page 1

The Ohio State University

Response of Dry bulb Onion and Carrot to Bicyclopyrone in a Clay Field

Trial ID: 07152015YC-2 Location: Celeryville Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: 07152015YC Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Yin Chen

Sponsor Contact:

General Trial InformationStudy Director: Yin Chen Title: Graduate student

Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan

Discipline: H herbicideTrial Status: F one-year/final Trial Reliability: GOOD

Initiation Date: Aug-5-2015 Planned Completion Date: Oct-28-2015Completion Date: Oct-28-2015

Trial LocationCity: CELERYVILLE Country: USA United States

State/Prov.: Ohio

Latitude of LL Corner °: 41.004897 NLongitude of LL Corner °: 82.730687 W

Altitude of LL Corner, Unit: 940.00 FT

Conducted Under GLP: NoConducted Under GEP: No

Objectives:Determine how onion and carrot respond to bicyclopyrone when applied PRE, POST and/or POST Directed in clay field.Conclusions:In the mineral (clay) soil (Wiers’ Farms), for onion variety Candy, 2% damage was found 20 Days after the PRE application (DA-PRE) and 5% and 18% for 64 DA-PRE. We found 23% and 35% damage on onion seedlings 28 DA-POST application, and 12% and 18% damage 28 DA-post directed (POSDIR) application of two concentrations. For onion Trailbazer, no damage was found 20 DA-PRE while 10% and 17% was found at 64 DA-PRE. Injury 20% and 29% on onions 28 DA-POST application and 12% and 10% 28 D after POSDIR application of two concentrations were found. Carrot in mineral soil field showed 23% and 38% injury 7 DA post-directed applications of two concentrations and 5% and 24% 21 DA-POSDIR treatment.

ContactsStudy Director: Yin Chen Title: Graduate student

Organization: Ohio Agricultural Research and Development CenterAddress: 1680 Madison Ave.

City+State/Prov: Wooster, OhioPostal Code: 44691 E-mail: [email protected]

Country: USA United States

Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanOrganization: The Ohio State University, OARDC

Address: 1680 Madison AvenueCity+State/Prov: Wooster, Ohio

Postal Code: 44691Country: USA United States

Crop DescriptionCrop 1: ALLXS Allium cepa (direct-seeded) Direct seeded onion

BBCH Scale: BVBT Planting Date: Aug-5-2015

Planting Method: BEDDED beddedRow Spacing, Unit: 16 IN Emergence Date: Aug-15-2015

Spacing Within Row, Unit: 2 IN

Crop 2: DAUCS Daucus carota subsp. sativus Garden carrot BBCH Scale: BVRT

1

Jan-13-2016 (07152015YC-4 onion mineral) ARM 2014.7 Site Description Page 2


Site and DesignTreated Plot Width: 6 FT

Treated Plot Length: 15 FTTreated Plot Area: 90 FT2 Treatments: 16

Replications: 4 Study Design: SPLPLO Split-Plot

Application Description

A B C

Application Date: Aug-5-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-10-2015

Application Method: SPRAY SPRAY SPRAY

Application Placement: BROADC BROADC BANDIR

Applied By: Yin Chen Yin Chen Yin Chen

Air Temperature, Unit: 75.5 F 68.1 F 68.1 F

% Relative Humidity: 51.61 72.51 72.51

Wind Velocity, Unit: 0.51 MPH 0 MPH 0 MPH

Wind Direction: N N N

Dew Presence (Y/N): N no

Soil Temperature, Unit: 88.4 F 68.4 F 68.4 F

Next Moisture Occurred On: Aug-7-2015 Sep-11-2015 Sep-11-2015

Crop Stage At Each Application

A B C

Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: ALLXS BVBT ALLXS BVBT ALLXS BVBT

Crop 2 Code, BBCH Scale: DAUCS BVRT DAUCS BVRT DAUCS BVRT

Application Equipment

A B C

Equipment Type: SPRAYE SPRAYE SPRAYE

Operation Pressure, Unit: 40 PSI 40 PSI 40 PSI

Nozzle Type: Teejet Teejet Teejet

Nozzle Size: 8002 8002 8002

Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 18 IN 18 IN 18 IN

Nozzles/Row: 4 4 1

Band Width, Unit: 5 FT 5 FT 1.25 FT

% Coverage: 100.0 100.0

Spray Volume, Unit: 15 GAL/AC 15 GAL/AC 15 GAL/AC

Mix Size, Unit: 3 liters 3 liters 3 liters

2

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=1,6,7

Jan-13-2016 (07152015YC-4 onion mineral) ARM 2014.7 AOV Means Table Page 3



Trial ID: 07152015YC-2 Location: Celeryville Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: 07152015YC Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Yin Chen

Sponsor Contact:

Crop Code ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXSBBCH Scale BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBTCrop Name Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded >

Rating Date Aug-25-2015 Sep-2-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-17-2015 Sep-24-2015 Oct-1-2015 Oct-8-2015Rating Type PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGENRating Unit %REL %REL %REL %REL %REL %REL %RELNumber of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Rating Timing A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7Days After First/Last Applic. 20 20 28 28 36 36 43 7 50 14 57 21 64 28Trt-Eval Interval 20 DA-A 28 DA-A 36 DA-A 43 DA-A 50 DA-A 57 DA-A 64 DA-A

Trt Treatment RateNo. Name Rate Unit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

1 Candy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0UNTREATED

2 Candy 2 a 1 c 3 b 3 bcd 4 ef 10 bc 5 deBicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/ha

3 Candy 2 a 3 bc 6 b 6 bcd 14 b-e 16 bc 18 cdeBicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/ha

4 Candy 3 bcd 13 b-e 20 bc 23 bcdBicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/haNIS 0.25 % v/v

5 Candy 16 b 28 bc 29 bc 35 bBicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/haNIS 0.25 % v/v

6 Candy 5 bcd 3 ef 6 cd 12 cdeBicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/haNIS 0.25 % v/v

7 Candy 6 bcd 11 cde 13 bc 18 cdeBicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/haNIS 0.25 % v/v

8 Candy 75 a 71 a 61 a 61 a 65 a 76 aDual Magnum 1.33 l/ha

9 Traibazer 0 a 0 c 0 b 0 d 0 f 0 d 0 eUNTREATED

10 Traibazer 0 a 4 bc 5 b 6 bcd 6 def 6 cd 10 deBicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/ha

11 Traibazer 0 a 13 b 3 b 3 bcd 5 def 10 bc 17 cdeBicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/ha

12 Traibazer 12 bc 25 bcd 20 bc 20 cdBicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/haNIS 0.25 % v/v

13 Traibazer 11 bc 34 b 32 b 29 bcBicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/haNIS 0.25 % v/v

14 Traibazer 1 cd 10 cde 5 cd 12 cdeBicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/haNIS 0.25 % v/v

3

Jan-13-2016 (07152015YC-4 onion mineral) ARM 2014.7 AOV Means Table Page 4


15 Traibazer 8 bcd 10 cde 12 bc 10 deBicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/haNIS 0.25 % v/v

16 Traibazer 79 a 74 a 65 a 63 a 68 a 78 aDual Magnum 1.33 l/ha

LSD P=.05 3.5 11.6t 13.9t 1.5t 1.6t 11.5t 11.1Standard Deviation 2.1 7.8t 9.3t 1.1t 1.1t 8.0t 7.7

Crop Code ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXSBBCH Scale BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBTCrop Name Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded >

Rating Date Aug-25-2015 Sep-2-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-17-2015 Sep-24-2015 Oct-1-2015 Oct-8-2015Rating Type PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGENRating Unit %REL %REL %REL %REL %REL %REL %RELNumber of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Rating Timing A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7Days After First/Last Applic. 20 20 28 28 36 36 43 7 50 14 57 21 64 28Trt-Eval Interval 20 DA-A 28 DA-A 36 DA-A 43 DA-A 50 DA-A 57 DA-A 64 DA-A


Crop Code ALLXS, BVBT, Allium cepa (direct-seeded), = USRating Type PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injuryRating Unit %REL = percent relativeRating Timing A1 = 1st Assessment According to Trial Schedule A2 = 2nd Assessment According to trial Schedule A3 = 3rd Assessment According to Trial Schedule A4 = 4th Assessment According to Trial Schedule A5 = 5th Assessment According to Trial Schedule A6 = 6th Assessment according to Trial Schedule A7 = 7th Assessment According to Trial Schedule

4

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.

Jan-13-2016 (07152015YC-5 carot mineral) ARM 2014.7 AOV Means Table Page 1



Trial ID: 07152015YC-2 Location: Celeryville Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: 07152015YC Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director:

Sponsor Contact:

Crop Code DAUCS DAUCS DAUCS DAUCSBBCH Scale BVRT BVRT BVRT BVRTCrop Name Garden carrot Garden carrot Garden carrot Garden carrotRating Date Sep-17-2015 Sep-24-2015 Oct-1-2015 Oct-8-2015Rating Type PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGENRating Unit % % % %Number of Subsamples 1 1 1 1Days After First/Last Applic. 7 7 14 14 21 21 28 28Trt-Eval Interval 7 DA-A 14 DA-A 21 DA-A 28 DA-A

Trt Treatment RateNo. Name Rate Unit 1 2 3 4

1 UNTREATED 0 0 0 0

2 Bicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/ha 23 b 10 b 5 b 8 bNIS 0.25 % v/v

3 Bicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/ha 38 a 34 a 24 a 26 aNIS 0.25 % v/v

4 Dual Magnum 1.33 l/ha 0 c 0 c 0 b 0 b

LSD P=.05 8.2 0.2t 10.3 9.2Standard Deviation 4.7 0.1t 6.0 5.3

Crop Code DAUCS, BVRT, Daucus carota subsp. sativus, = USRating Type PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injuryRating Unit % = percent

5

Jan-13-2016 (07152015YC-1 onion muck) ARM 2014.7 Site Description Page 1


Response of Dry bulb Onion and Carrot to Bicyclopyrone in a Muck field

Trial ID: 07152015YC-1 Location: WOOSTER, OH Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: 07152015YC Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director:

Sponsor Contact:

General Trial InformationStudy Director: Yin Chen Title: Research Associate



Objectives:Determine how onion and carrot respond to bicyclopyrone when applied PRE, POST and/or POST Directed in Muck.Conclusions:No damage was observed for carrot and onion in the Muck field after treatment A (PRE) of two concentrations (37.5 and 50 g ai/ha) while 40% and 56% damage was found on onion after POST treatment of 37.5 and 50 g ai/ha 44 DAT, respectively.

ContactsStudy Director: Yin Chen Title: Research Associate

Organization: The Ohio State University, OARDCAddress: 1680 Madison Avenue

City+State/Prov: Wooster, OhioPostal Code: 44691


Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanOrganization: The Ohio State University, OARDC



Crop DescriptionCrop 1: ALLXS Allium cepa (direct-seeded) Direct seeded onion

BBCH Scale: BVBT



Replications: 4 Study Design: RACOBL Randomized Complete Block (RCB)

6

Jan-13-2016 (07152015YC-1 onion muck) ARM 2014.7 Site Description Page 2

The Ohio State UniversityApplication Description

A B

Application Date: Aug-5-2015 Aug-27-2015

Application Method: SPRAY SPRAY

Application Timing: AUGUST AUGUST

Application Placement: BROADC BROADC

Applied By: Yin Chen Yin Chen

Air Temperature, Unit: 67.8 F 61.8 F

% Relative Humidity: 80.6 89.7

Wind Velocity, Unit: 0 MPH 1.34 MPH

Wind Direction: N NW

Dew Presence (Y/N): N no N no

Soil Temperature, Unit: 68 F 63.6 F

Soil Moisture: NORMAL NORMAL

Next Moisture Occurred On: Aug-7-2015 Aug-29-2015


A B

Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: ALLXS BVBT ALLXS BVBT

Stage Scale Used: BBCH BBCH

Stage Majority, Percent: 01 100 12 90

Height, Unit: 3 IN


A B

Equipment Type: SPRAYE SPRAYE

Nozzle Type: Teejet Teejet

Nozzle Size: 8002 8002

Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 18 IN 18 IN

Nozzles/Row: 4 4

Band Width, Unit: 5 FT 5 FT

% Coverage: 100.0 100.0

Ground Speed, Unit: 3.5 MPH 3.5 MPH

Spray Volume, Unit: 15 GAL/AC 15 GAL/AC

Mix Size, Unit: 3 liters 3 liters

7

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.

Jan-13-2016 (07152015YC-1 onion muck) ARM 2014.7 AOV Means Table Page 3


Response of Dry bulb Onion and Carrot to Bicyclopyrone in a Muck field


Sponsor Contact:

Crop Code ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXSBBCH Scale BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBT BVBTCrop Name Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded > Direct seeded >Rating Date Aug-18-2015 Aug-25-2015 Sep-2-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-17-2015 Sep-24-2015 Oct-8-2015Rating Unit % % % % % % %Number of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1SE Group No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Days After First/Last Applic. 13 13 20 20 28 6 36 14 43 21 50 28 64 42Trt-Eval Interval 13 DA-A 20 DA-A 28 DA-A 36 DA-A 43 DA-A 50 DA-A 64 DA-A


1 Untreated Check 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Bicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/ha 0 a 0 a 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 c

3 Bicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/ha 0 a 0 a 3 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 c

4 Bicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/ha 45 a 38 b 44 a 41 b 40 bNIS 0.25 % v/v

5 Bicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/ha 58 a 51 a 50 a 54 a 56 aNIS 0.25 % v/v

6 Dual Magnum 1.33 l/ha 0 a 0 a 0 b 0 c 0 b 0 c 0 c

LSD P=.05 0.0 0.0 17.4 11.9 11.6 11.8 14.0Standard Deviation 0.0 0.0 11.3 7.7 7.6 7.7 9.1

Crop Code ALLXS, BVBT, Allium cepa (direct-seeded), = USRating Unit % = percent

8

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=1,2,3,4,5,6

Jan-13-2016 (07152015YC-2 carrot muck) ARM 2014.7 AOV Means Table Page 1


Response of Dry Bulb Onion and Carrot to Bicyclopyrone in a Muck Field


Sponsor Contact:

Crop Code DAUCS DAUCS DAUCS DAUCS DAUCS DAUCSBBCH Scale BVRT BVRT BVRT BVRT BVRT BVRTCrop Name Garden carrot Garden carrot Garden carrot Garden carrot Garden carrot Garden carrotRating Date Aug-21-2015 Aug-25-2015 Sep-2-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-17-2015 Sep-24-2015Rating Type PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGENRating Unit % % % % % %Number of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1Rating Timing A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6Days After First/Last Applic. 16 16 20 20 28 28 36 36 43 43 50 50

Trt Treatment RateNo. Name Rate Unit 1 2 3 4 5 6

1 UNTREATED 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 Bicyclopyrone 37.5 g ai/ha 0 a 2 a 3 a 0 a 2 a 2 a

3 Bicyclopyrone 50.0 g ai/ha 0 a 2 a 5 a 1 3 a 2 a

4 Dual Magnum 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a 0 a

LSD P=.05 0.0 0.8t 8.6 0.0 5.1 0.8tStandard Deviation 0.0 0.5t 4.7 0.0 2.8 0.5t

Crop Code DAUCS, BVRT, Daucus carota subsp. sativus, = USRating Type PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injuryRating Unit % = percentRating Timing A1 = 1st Assessment According to Trial Schedule A2 = 2nd Assessment According to trial Schedule A3 = 3rd Assessment According to Trial Schedule A4 = 4th Assessment According to Trial Schedule A5 = 5th Assessment According to Trial Schedule A6 = 6th Assessment according to Trial Schedule

9

(BURN2015 Plastic) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 1


COMPARISON OF BURNDOWN HERBICIDES PRIOR TO TRANSPLANT

Trial ID: BURN2015 Plastic Location: Trial Year:Protocol ID: BURN2015 Plastic Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Rick Edwards

Sponsor Contact:

General Trial InformationStudy Director: Rick Edwards

Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Title: Professor


Initiation Date: Jun-5-2015 Planned Completion Date: Jun-30-2015Completion Date: Jun-30-2015

Trial LocationCity: Celeryville Country: USA United States

State/Prov.: Ohio


Objectives:

Evaluate common non-selective herbicides for burndown weed control prior to planting vegetables. The field rows were raised beds about 6 inches high, with plastic ground cover that was in its third year of use.

Conclusions:

Roundup Powermax provided the best control (90%) of Yellow cress and Pennsylvania smartweed 14 days after treatment (DAT). Liberty and Gramoxone also showed good control of Yellow cress at 14 DAT. At 21 DAT Roundup Powermax was still the best treatment in control of Yellowcress as well as Pennsylvania smartweed. Other treatments had similar control of weeds, except AIM, which had the least control of Yellowcress at 21 DAT.

ContactsStudy Director: Rick Edwards

Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Title: ProfessorOrganization: Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center






10

(BURN2015 Plastic) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 2


A

Application Date: Jun-5-2015

Appl. Start Time: 11:00

Appl. Stop Time: 12:00 PM

Application Method: SPRAY

Application Timing: JULY

Application Placement: BROADC

Air Temperature, Unit: 75 F

% Relative Humidity: 54.6

Wind Velocity, Unit: 8.8 MPH

Wind Direction: NW


A

Equipment Type: SPRAYE

Nozzle Type: XR Teejet

Nozzle Size: 8003

Nozzles/Row: 4

11

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

(BURN2015 Plastic) ARM 2014.8 AOV Means Table Page 3




Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code RORSS RORSS POLPY POLPY POROL POROL POAAN POAANRating Date Jun-18-2015 Jun-18-2015 Jun-18-2015 Jun-18-2015 Jun-18-2015 Jun-18-2015 Jun-18-2015 Jun-18-2015

Rating Type VIGOR STARED VIGOR STARED VIGOR STARED VIGOR STAREDNumber of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Trt-Eval Interval 13 DA-A 13 DA-A 13 DA-A 13 DA-A 13 DA-A 13 DA-A 13 DA-A 13 DA-ANumber of Decimals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Trt Treatment RateNo. Name Rate Unit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 Untreated Check 100 0 100 0 100 0 100 0

2 ROUNDUP POWERMAX 44 fl oz/a 5 c 90 a 75 a 33 a 95 a 47 a 0 a 21 a

3 LIBERTY 22 fl oz/a 97 a 36 a 87 a 50 a 90 a 63 a 0 a 100 a

4 GRAMOXONE INTEON 2 pt/a 29 bc 45 a 95 a 45 a 79 a 33 a 0 a 100 aNIS 0.25 % v/v

5 AIM EC 1 fl oz/a 78 ab 53 a 99 a 15 a 94 a 33 a 0 a 100 a

6 ET 1 fl oz/a 66 ab 40 a 99 a 15 a 94 a 40 a 9 a 57 aCOC 1 % v/v

7 EMERION 7000 20 % v/v 91 a 40 a 88 a 50 a 90 a 55 a 1 a 91 a

LSD P=.05 27.7t 41.3 38.1t 63.7 20.5t 38.0 25.0t 0.6tStandard Deviation 18.2t 27.3 25.1t 42.0 13.5t 25.1 16.5t 0.4t

12



SETVI SETVIJun-18-2015 Jun-18-2015

VIGOR STARED1 1 1

13 DA-A 13 DA-A0 0

9 10 11

100 0

67 a 33 a

58 a 63 a

33 a 65 a

98 25 a

78 a 50 a

90 a 53 a

54.4 60.8 .35.0 40.1 .

Pest CodeRating Date

Rating TypeNumber of SubsamplesTrt-Eval IntervalNumber of Decimals

Trt Treatment RateNo. Name Rate Unit

1 Untreated Check

2 ROUNDUP POWERMAX 44 fl oz/a

3 LIBERTY 22 fl oz/a

4 GRAMOXONE INTEON 2 pt/aNIS 0.25 % v/v

5 AIM EC 1 fl oz/a

6 ET 1 fl oz/aCOC 1 % v/v

7 EMERION 7000 20 % v/v

LSD P=.05Standard Deviation

13





Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code RORSS, Rorippa sp., = US POLPY, Persicaria pensylvanica, = US POROL, Portulaca oleracea, = US POAAN, Poa annua, = US SETVI, Setaria viridis viridis, = USRating Type VIGOR = vigor STARED = stand reduction

14

(BURN2015) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 1



Trial ID: BURN2015 Location: Willard Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: BURN2015 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Rick Edwards

Sponsor Contact:

General Trial InformationStudy Director: Richard Edwards Title: Research Associate



Initiation Date: Jun-5-2015Completion Date: Jun-30-2015

Trial LocationCity: Willard Country: USA United States

State/Prov.: OhioPostal Code: 44890


Objectives:

Compare six herbicides as a burndown in a field prior to transplanting vegetables. Apply one broadcast application in early spring to target annual broadleaf weeds.

Conclusions:

At 14 days after treatment, Roundup Powermax (glyphosate) at 44 oz/A showed the best control of Common yellowcress and Pennsylvania smartweed. At 21 days after treatment, Roundup Powermax continued to surpass other treatments in control of Common yellowcress. Glyphosate in general provided higher levels of burndown in all weeds at 14 and 21 days. Glufosinate (Liberty) at 22 oz/A was similar to Roundup Powermax in control of Common yellowcress and Pennsylvania smartweed at 14 days after treatment, compared to the rest of the treatments. AIM (carfentrozone) at 1 oz/A showed less control of Common yellowcress, having 10 % control at 21 days, compared to Roundup at 100% control of the same weed at that time. All other treatments at each rating were similar in control of weeds.

ContactsStudy Director: Richard Edwards Title: Research Associate







Pest DescriptionPest 1 Type: W Code: RORSS Rorippa sp.

Common Name: Yellowcress

Pest 2 Type: W Code: POLAV Polygonum aviculareCommon Name: Prostrate knotweed

Pest 3 Type: W Code: POLPY Persicaria pensylvanicaCommon Name: Pennsylvania smartweed

Pest 4 Type: W Code: CHEAL Chenopodium albumCommon Name: Common lambsquarters

15

(BURN2015) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 2

The Ohio State UniversitySite and Design

Treated Plot Width: 10 FT Site Type: SANDYTreated Plot Length: 30 FT

Treated Plot Area: 300 FT2 Treatments: 7Replications: 4 Study Design: RACOBL Randomized Complete Block (RCB)

Moisture and Weather ConditionsOverall Moisture Conditions: WET wet


A


Appl. Start Time: 10:00 AM

Appl. Stop Time: 11:00 AM







Wind Direction: NW

Soil Temperature, Unit: 70 4

Soil Moisture: WET

% Cloud Cover: 10

Pest Stage At Each Application

A

Pest 1 Code, Type, Scale: RORSS W

Height, Unit: 8 IN

Height Minimum, Maximum: 4 10

Pest 2 Code, Type, Scale: POLAV W

Height, Unit: 8 IN

Pest 3 Code, Type, Scale: POLPY W

Height, Unit: 8 IN

Pest 4 Code, Type, Scale: CHEAL W

Height, Unit: 8 IN


A


Operation Pressure, Unit: 40 PSI


Nozzle Size: 8002

Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 18 IN

Nozzles/Row: 4

Band Width, Unit: 6 FT

Spray Volume, Unit: 20 GAL/AC

Mix Size, Unit: 3 liters

No. Date By Deviations 1.Jun-5-2015 Treatment 5 inadvertently applied to plot 204, instead of treatment 2. This plot was marked as damaged, so is not included incalculated means.

16

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16

(BURN2015) ARM 2014.8 AOV Means Table Page 3




Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code RORSS RORSS POLAV POLAV CHEAL CHEAL POLPY POLPYRating Date Jun-19-2015 Jun-19-2015 Jun-19-2015 Jun-19-2015 Jun-19-2015 Jun-19-2015 Jun-19-2015 Jun-19-2015

Rating Type STARED VIGOR STARED VIGOR STARED VIGOR STARED VIGORNumber of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Trt-Eval Interval 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-ANumber of Decimals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 Untreated Check 0 100 0 100 0 100 0 100

2 ROUNDUP POWERMAX 44 fl oz/a A 70 a 3 c 47 a 40 a 40 a 0 a 90 a 7 b

3 LIBERTY 22 fl oz/a A 53 a 35 bc 83 a 45 a 40 a 75 a 70 a 33 ab

4 GRAMOXONE INTEON 2 pt/a A 60 a 55 ab 40 a 38 a 50 a 20 a 68 a 60 aNIS 0.25 % v/v A

5 AIM EC 1 fl oz/a A 25 a 70 ab 38 a 58 a 45 a 33 a 63 a 88 aNIS 0.25 % v/v A

6 ET 1 fl oz/a A 68 a 55 ab 28 a 80 a 55 a 43 a 63 a 78 aCOC 1 % v/v A

7 EMERION 7000 20 % v/v A 28 a 85 a 38 a 90 a 35 a 50 a 33 a 75 a

LSD P=.05 37.1 31.8 51.2 47.4 51.7 47.9 42.4 40.9Standard Deviation 24.5 21.0 33.8 31.2 34.1 31.6 27.9 26.9

17



RORSS RORSS POLAV POLAV CHEAL CHEAL POLPY POLPYJun-26-2015 Jun-26-2015 Jun-26-2015 Jun-26-2015 Jun-26-2015 Jun-26-2015 Jun-26-2015 Jun-26-2015

STARED VIGOR STARED VIGOR STARED VIGOR STARED VIGOR1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

21 DA-A 21 DA-A 21 DA-A 21 DA-A 21 DA-A 21 DA-A 21 DA-A 21 DA-A0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

38 68 23 85 53 35 38 63

100 a 67 a 30 a 75 a 37 a 63 a 37 a 63 a

68 b 60 a 63 a 66 a 73 a 25 a 70 a 35 a

68 b 60 a 23 a 91 a 58 a 45 a 53 a 55 a

10 c 65 a 23 a 91 a 43 a 53 a 50 a 63 a

58 b 60 a 28 a 87 a 60 a 28 a 48 a 55 a

73 b 58 a 65 a 67 a 58 a 35 a 58 a 63 a

23.7 48.7 49.4 42.2t 47.9 46.6 44.7 33.215.6 32.1 32.6 27.8t 31.6 30.7 29.4 21.9

Pest CodeRating Date

Rating TypeNumber of SubsamplesTrt-Eval IntervalNumber of Decimals

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code

1 Untreated Check

2 ROUNDUP POWERMAX 44 fl oz/a A

3 LIBERTY 22 fl oz/a A

4 GRAMOXONE INTEON 2 pt/a ANIS 0.25 % v/v A

5 AIM EC 1 fl oz/a ANIS 0.25 % v/v A

6 ET 1 fl oz/a ACOC 1 % v/v A

7 EMERION 7000 20 % v/v A


18





Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code RORSS, Rorippa sp., = US POLAV, Polygonum aviculare, = US CHEAL, Chenopodium album, = US POLPY, Persicaria pensylvanica, = USRating Type STARED = stand reduction VIGOR = vigor

19

Dec-18-2015 (AUTH.VAR.TOMA.JPR.01) ARM 2014.7 Site Description Page 1


TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL COMPARING AUTHORITY MTZ TO LOCAL STANDARD

Trial ID: AUTH.VAR.TOMA.JPR.01 Location: FREMONT, OH Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: AUTH.VAR.TOMA.JPR.01 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: SULF.TOM.15.JPR.01 Study Director: Rick Edwards

Sponsor Contact: JOSEPH REED




Initiation Date: May-14-2015 Planned Completion Date: Nov-20-2015Completion Date: Sep-16-2015

Trial LocationCity: Fremont Country: USA United States

State/Prov.: Ohio


Objectives:

Compare the performance of either Authority MTZ or Dual Magnum herbicides applied pre-transplant to 6 varieties of processing tomato.

Conclusions:

This trial compared six varieties of processing tomato in the performance of two herbicides - Authority MTZ at 12 oz/A and Dual Magnum at 1.5 pints/A applied pre-transplant. There were no differences in any treatment for phytotoxicity from 14 days after treatment through 35 days after treatment. There was a difference in phytotoxicity seen in H5108 with Dual Magnum with 25% damage, compared to H1178 at 60 days after treatment. H1178 showed 0 and 5 % damage, with Authority MTZ or Dual Magnum. There was abnormally high rainfall during this trial between late May and mid July. During this time over 13.8 inches of rainfall were recorded. This is about twice the normal average amount for this time period.There were differences in total fruit weight between varieties and/or herbicide treatment. H3406 , with Authority MTZ and H1178 and Gem331 with Dual Magnum had total weight per plot of fruits of 42 pounds. These were better than H5108 with either Authority MTZ or Dual Magnum, at 28 or 24 pounds,respectively and also H3402 with Dual Magnum with 27 pounds.All other varieties/herbicide treatments showed no differences in total fruit, red or green fruit yields or percent red fruit at harvest.








20


The Ohio State UniversityCrop Description

Crop 1: LYPES Solanum lycopersicum TomatoVariety: Tsh 4 BBCH Scale: BVSO

Planting Date: May-18-2015 Planting Method: TRAMAC transplanted - machine

Row Spacing, Unit: 5 FTSpacing Within Row, Unit: 1 FT Harvest Date: Aug-26-2015

Crop 2: LYPES Solanum lycopersicum TomatoVariety: H5108 BBCH Scale: BVSO


Harvest Date: Aug-26-2015



Harvest Date: Sep-4-2015







Crop 6: LYPES Solanum lycopersicum TomatoVariety: Gem 331 BBCH Scale: BVSO



Site and DesignTreated Plot Width: 15 FT Site Type: FIELD field



Soil DescriptionDescription Name: Fremont

% Sand: 50 % OM: 2.5 Texture: LFS loamy fine sand% Silt: 40 pH: 7

% Clay: 10 CEC: 9.3

Moisture and Weather ConditionsOverall Moisture Conditions: WEWEDR wet-wet-dry

Closest Weather Station: Fremont Distance, Unit: 0.2 MI

21



A

Application Date: May-14-2015


Appl. Stop Time: 10:00 AM


Application Timing: PRETRA


Air Temperature, Unit: 48.1 F



Wind Direction: E


Soil Temperature, Unit: 54.2 F

Soil Moisture: SLIDRY

% Cloud Cover: 20


A

Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: LYPES BVSO







A




Nozzle Size: 8002

Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 15 in

Nozzles/Row: 12


Ground Speed, Unit: 3 MPH


Mix Size, Unit: 6 gallons

22

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.

Dec-18-2015 (AUTH.VAR.TOMA.JPR.01) ARM 2014.7 AOV Means Table Page 4





Crop Code LYPES LYPES LYPES LYPES LYPES LYPES LYPES LYPESPart Rated FRUTOT - FRUMAR - FRUIMM - FRUROT -Rating Date May-28-2015 Jun-5-2015 Jun-18-2015 Jul-13-2015 Sep-4-2015 Sep-4-2015 Sep-4-2015 Sep-4-2015Rating Type PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN WEIFRE WEIFRE WEIFRE WEIFRERating Unit % % % % LB LB LB LBCrop Stage Majority 14Rating Timing A1Trt-Eval Interval 14 DA-A 22 DA-A 35 DA-A 60 DA-A 113 DA-A 113 DA-A 113 DA-A 113 DA-ANumber of Decimals


1 Tsh4 var. 5 a 0 a 5 a 11 ab 29 ab 22 a 5 c 1 dAuthority MTZ 12 fl oz/a A

2 Tsh4 var. 5 a 3 a 3 a 9 ab 30 ab 23 a 6 c 1 bcdDual Magnum 1.5 pt/a A

3 H5108 0 a 0 a 8 a 18 ab 28 b 21 a 5 c 2 a-dAuthority MTZ 12 fl oz/a A

4 H5108 0 a 0 a 3 a 25 a 24 b 16 a 6 c 2 a-dDual Magnum 1.5 pt/a A

5 H3402 1 a 0 a 5 a 18 ab 28 ab 17 a 10 abc 2 a-dAuthority MTZ 12 fl oz/a A

6 H3402 5 a 1 a 8 a 11 ab 27 b 17 a 9 abc 1 cdDual Magnum 1.5 pt/a A

7 H3406 5 a 5 a 8 a 15 ab 42 a 25 a 14 ab 3 aAuthority MTZ 12 fl oz/a A

8 H3406 1 a 3 a 0 a 8 ab 37 ab 18 a 15 a 3 aDual Magnum 1.5 pt/a A

9 H1178 1 a 1 a 5 a 0 b 38 ab 25 a 9 abc 2 abAuthority MTZ 12 fl oz/a A

10 H1178 0 a 1 a 3 a 5 b 42 a 26 a 13 ab 3 aDual Magnum 1.5 pt/a A

11 Gem331 0 a 0 a 3 a 14 ab 34 ab 25 a 7 bc 2 abAuthority MTZ 12 fl oz/a A

12 Gem331 4 a 0 a 0 a 10 ab 42 a 30 a 10 abc 2 abcDual Magnum 1.5 pt/a A

LSD P=.05 4.3 3.9 9.5 10.8 8.8 9.5 0.7t 0.2tStandard Deviation 3.0 2.7 6.6 7.5 6.1 6.6 0.5t 0.1t

Replicate F 1.345 0.442 0.048 3.782 9.367 3.929 8.165 0.362Replicate Prob(F) 0.2765 0.7246 0.9856 0.0195 0.0001 0.0167 0.0003 0.7811Treatment F 2.309 1.288 0.683 3.034 4.868 1.704 4.986 5.915Treatment Prob(F) 0.0313 0.2744 0.7445 0.0066 0.0002 0.1160 0.0002 0.0001

23



LYPES LYPES LYPESFRUMAR - FRUTOT - FRUMAR -

WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT% of TOT T-US T-US

2 2 2

9 10 11

0.77 a 24.83 ab 18.86 a

0.76 a 26.14 ab 19.93 a

0.76 a 23.96 b 18.51 a

0.68 a 20.65 b 13.94 a

0.58 a 24.59 ab 14.57 a

0.62 a 23.63 b 14.72 a

0.59 a 36.57 a 21.63 a

0.48 32.39 ab 15.60 a

0.66 a 33.06 ab 21.91 a

0.59 a 36.90 a 22.46 a

0.71 a 29.77 ab 21.56 a

0.70 a 36.83 a 25.74 a

0.139 7.677 8.3160.096 5.317 5.759

2.802 9.367 3.9290.0568 0.0001 0.0167

2.332 4.868 1.7040.0358 0.0002 0.1160

Crop CodePart RatedRating DateRating TypeRating UnitCrop Stage MajorityRating TimingTrt-Eval IntervalNumber of Decimals


1 Tsh4 var.Authority MTZ 12 fl oz/a A

2 Tsh4 var.Dual Magnum 1.5 pt/a A

3 H5108Authority MTZ 12 fl oz/a A

4 H5108Dual Magnum 1.5 pt/a A







11 Gem331Authority MTZ 12 fl oz/a A

12 Gem331Dual Magnum 1.5 pt/a A


Replicate FReplicate Prob(F)Treatment FTreatment Prob(F)

24






Crop Code LYPES, BVSO, Solanum lycopersicum, = USPart Rated FRUTOT = fruit - total FRUMAR = fruit - marketable FRUIMM = fruit - immature FRUROT = fruit - rottenRating Type PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injury WEIFRE = weight - fresh WEIGHT = weightRating Unit % = percent LB = pound T-US = ton (short=2000 lb)Crop Stage Majority 14 = 4th leaf on main shoot unfoldedRating Timing A1 = 1st Assessment According to Trial Schedule

25

(Apple Fall Planting FMC 2013) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 1


Apples Fall Planting - FMC 2013

Trial ID: SULF.APPL.FALL2013 Location: WOOSTER, OH Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: SULF.APPL.FALL2013 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Richard Edwards

Official Trial ID: Sponsor Contact:



Discipline: H herbicide Data Location: ARM ARM Assessment DataTrial Status: M multi-year/interim Trial Reliability: GOOD

Initiation Date: Apr-22-2013

Trial LocationCity: Wooster Country: USA United States

State/Prov.: Ohio OHPostal Code: 44691

Latitude of LL Corner °: 40.779762 NLongitude of LL Corner °: 81.9239477 W USAOH 42.3271331 - 38.4034194

Altitude of LL Corner, Unit: 1020.00 FT -80.5184478 - -84.8203125


Objectives:

Observe Sulfentrazone applied at different rates and timings ahead of planting Apples in the fall, keeping plots weed free with periodic applications of burndown herbicides. Measure tree vigor and growth.

Conclusions:

In the first year after planting there were no differences in growth and development of the trees between all treatments.

In In the second year after planting there were no differences in growth and development of the trees between all treatments.





Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Title: ProfessorOrganization: OARDC/The Ohio State University

Address: 1680 Madison Ave.City+State/Prov: Wooster, Ohio

Postal Code: 44691

Crop DescriptionCrop 1: MABSS Malus sp. AppleVariety: Honeycrisp Rootstock M7 BBCH Scale: BDIC

Description: Bareroot Planting Date: Nov-14-2013

Planting Method: TRAHAN transplanted - handDepth, Unit: 3 FT

Soil Moisture: SLIWET slightly wet, moist

26

(Apple Fall Planting FMC 2013) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 2


Treated Plot Width: 6 FTTreated Plot Length: 20 FT

Treated Plot Area: 120 FT2 Treatments: 6Replications: 4 Study Design: RACOBL Randomized Complete Block (RCB)

Soil DescriptionDescription Name: Unit 2 HCS OARDC

% Sand: 11 % OM: 3.0 Texture: SIL silt loam% Silt: 75 pH: 6.99 Soil Name: WOOSTER SILT LOAM

% Clay: 14 CEC: 8.3 Fert. Level: G good Soil Drainage: G good


A B C D

Application Date: Apr-22-2013 Jul-12-2013 Jun-22-2015 Dec-23-2015

Appl. Start Time: 12:00 PM 11:00 AM 9:00 12:00

Application Method: SPRAY SPRAY SPRAY SPRAY

Application Timing: APRIL JULY JUNE DECEMB

Application Placement: PLOT PLOT PLOT PLOT

Air Temperature, Unit: 57.3 F 70.0 F 74.2 F 57.5 F

% Relative Humidity: 52.37 74.5 50.5 89.6

Wind Velocity, Unit: 5.13 MPH 9 mph 5.9 mph 3.9 MPH

Wind Direction: SE NE NE

Dew Presence (Y/N): N no N no N no N no

% Cloud Cover: 20 80 50


A B C D

Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: MABSS BDIC MABSS BDIC MABSS BDIC MABSS BDIC


A B C D

Appl. Equipment: SPRAYER SPRAYER SPRAYER SPRAYER

Equipment Type: BACSPR BACSPR BACSPR BACSPR

Operation Pressure, Unit: 40 PSI 40 PSI 40 PSI 40 PSI

Nozzle Size: 8002 8002 8002 8002

Nozzles/Row: 2 2 2 2

27

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=11,13,16

(Apple Fall Planting FMC 2013) ARM 2014.8 AOV Means Table Page 3





Pest Code TRFRE AMARE CNDSS CYPES PLAMA DIGSS TARSSCrop Code MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSSPart Rated BRANCH CRating Date Aug-8-2013 Aug-8-2013 Aug-8-2013 Aug-8-2013 Aug-8-2013 Aug-8-2013 Aug-8-2013 May-22-2014

Rating Type CANWEE CANWEE CANWEE CANWEE CANWEE CANWEE CANWEE DIAMETRating Unit % % % % % % % mmNumber of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Trt-Eval Interval 27 DA-B 27 DA-B 27 DA-B 27 DA-B 27 DA-B 27 DA-B 27 DA-B 314 DA-BNumber of Decimals 1


1 Untreated Check 100 100 88 75 78 88 75 3.9

2 Sulfentrazone 12 oz/A Spring 12 oz/a AC 21 a 4 a 2 b 1 a 4 a 10 a 0 a 4.1 a

3 Sulfentrazone 12 oz/A July 12 oz/a BC 16 a 0 a 10 ab 0 a 1 a 1 a 2 a 4.1 a

4 Sulfentrazone 6 oz/A Spring 6 oz/a ACD 28 a 1 a 3 b 1 a 0 a 2 a 1 a 3.5 a

5 Sulfentrazone 8 oz/A Spring 8 oz/a ACD 21 a 2 a 2 b 0 a 1 a 5 a 3 a 3.6 a

6 Sulfentrazone 8 oz/A July 8 oz/a BC 21 a 1 a 33 a 2 a 2 a 2 a 5 a 4.2 a

LSD P=.05 30.6 0.6t 0.7t 0.8t 1.0t 1.0t 0.8t 0.60Standard Deviation 19.8 0.4t 0.5t 0.5t 0.6t 0.7t 0.5t 0.39

28



MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSSBRANCH C PLANT C PLANT C PLANT - BRANCH C PLANT C PLANT C PLANT C

Sep-4-2014 Sep-4-2014 Sep-4-2014 Sep-4-2014 Jul-16-2015 Jul-16-2015 Jul-16-2015 Jul-16-2015

DIAMET VIGOR LENGTH DIAMET MEAN DIAMET VIGOR LENGTHmm 0-100 cm mm cm

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1419 DA-B 419 DA-B 419 DA-B 419 DA-B 24 DA-C 24 DA-C 24 DA-C 24 DA-C

1 1 1 1

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

5.2 75 14 13.3 5.1 13.3 75 22

5.3 68 a 14 a 13.2 a 5.0 a 13.3 a 68 a 13 a

4.8 a 83 a 11 a 14.0 a 5.2 a 13.9 a 63 a 15 a

4.6 a 80 a 12 a 14.2 a 4.2 a 13.9 a 70 a 12 a

4.7 a 65 a 15 a 13.4 a 5.1 a 13.4 a 68 a 13 a

4.8 a 73 a 14 a 13.5 a 5.1 a 13.4 a 60 a 16 a

0.96 20.2 0.3t 1.18 1.48 1.53 18.5 0.2t0.60 13.1 0.2t 0.77 0.95 0.99 12.0 0.2t

Pest CodeCrop CodePart RatedRating Date

Rating TypeRating UnitNumber of SubsamplesTrt-Eval IntervalNumber of Decimals


1 Untreated Check

2 Sulfentrazone 12 oz/A Spring 12 oz/a AC

3 Sulfentrazone 12 oz/A July 12 oz/a BC

4 Sulfentrazone 6 oz/A Spring 6 oz/a ACD




29



MABSS MABSS MABSS MABSSPLANT C BRANCH C PLANT C PLANT C

Oct-12-2015 Oct-12-2015 Oct-12-2015 Oct-12-2015

VIGOR MEAN DIAMET HEIGHT0-5

1 1 1 1112 DA-C

17 18 19 20

2 6 18 141

2 a 7 a 18 a 140 a

2 a 6 c 18 a 142 a

2 a 6 bc 20 a 146 a

1 a 6 ab 18 a 137 a

2 a 7 ab 18 a 147 a

1.0 0.6 1.5 16.00.7 0.4 1.0 10.4

Pest CodeCrop CodePart RatedRating Date

Rating TypeRating UnitNumber of SubsamplesTrt-Eval IntervalNumber of Decimals


1 Untreated Check

2 Sulfentrazone 12 oz/A Spring 12 oz/a AC






30






Pest Code TRFRE, Trifolium repens, = US AMARE, Amaranthus retroflexus, = US CNDSS, Conyza sp., = US CYPES, Cyperus esculentus, = US PLAMA, Plantago major, = US DIGSS, Digitaria sp., = US TARSS, Taraxacum sp., = USCrop Code MABSS, BDIC, Malus sp., = USPart Rated BRANCH = branch PLANT = plant C = Crop is Part RatedRating Type CANWEE = cover, weed DIAMET = diameter VIGOR = vigor LENGTH = length MEAN = mean HEIGHT = heightRating Unit % = percent mm = millimeter 0-100 = 0-100 index/scale-percent cm = centimeter 0-5 = 0-5 index/scale

31

1

EVALUATION OF NEW HERBICIDE ACTIVE INGREDIENTS/FORMULATIONS FOR

WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN

Background and objective:

The objective of this trial was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Acuron, Accent, Laudis, Aim, Anthem and Zidua to control grasses and other weeds in sweet corn.

Methods:

An experiment was conducted at Maurer Farms (2901 Batdorf Road, Wooster, Ohio 44691). Sweet corn seeds (Obsession) were planted on July 5th with row spacing at 30 inches and plant spacing at 8.36 inches. The field was marked out on July 8th with 4 replications and 10 treatment plots (10’ by 25’) within each replication. Two pre-emergence treatments (Acuron at 2.5 and 3 qt/A + 0.25% NIS) were applied on the 8th, using 8003 Flat Fan nozzles that were calibrated to deliver 20 gal/A liquid at a pressure of 30 psi. Seven post-emergence treatments (Accent at 0.67 oz/A + 1% COC and 2 lb/A ammonium sulfate; Aim at 0.75 oz/A + 0.25% NIS; Anthem at 8 and 10 oz/A + 1.5 pt/A MSO; Laudis at 3 oz/A + 1% MSO and 1.5 lb/A ammonium sulfate; Zidua at 2 and 3 oz/A) were applied on July 23rd using the same method as the pre-emergence treatments. Untreated control plots were weeded in mid-August. Visual evaluation of crop injury and weed control were conducted.

On September 10th, height of the upmost leaf beneath the tassel was measured on 10 plants that had been selected randomly from the central two rows of each plot. Height was measured from the ground to the base of the leaf. Yield was determined on September 23rd from 10 feet of the central two rows of each plot. Crop stand count (total plants in the two 10 foot sessions), and marketable ears (large ears filled to the tip) were all recorded. Total weight of marketable ears (including husks), and length and diameter (largest diameter along an ear) of five ears randomly selected from those picked were also recorded.

After harvest, rye was planted as a cover crop on October 21st. Winter weed density and cover crop performance were visually evaluated on November 19th and December 30th by comparing to growth in un-treated control plots.

Results and discussion

Crop injury and weed control: This trial evaluated nine treatments (six herbicides among which three have two rates) for crop injury and weed control. Treated plots were compared to an untreated weedy control. On July 30th, 7 days after treatment (DAT), Aim caused the highest crop injury at 28% (mainly leaf chlorosis), followed by Anthem at 19% and 16% for high and low rate. There was no crop injury in corn treated with any other of the herbicides. Corn had almost recovered from injury in Aim an Anthem plots by 21 DAT. Acuron, which is the only pre-emergence herbicide in the trial, provided nearly complete control of both purslane and annual grasses (mainly fall panicum and crabgrass). Anthem provided good purslane control at around 90%, but its effect on


32

2

annual grasses was less satisfactory with only around 50% control. Zidua had very limited control on the weeds present in the trial field (Table 1 and Figure 2).

Sweet corn plant height, yield and ear quality: Growth of sweet corn is influenced by herbicides, weed competition and their interactions. Height is a good indicator of sweet corn growth and vigor. Although sweet corn is retailed by count, ear quality is an important factor that affects its appeal to customers. The height of the upmost leaf beneath tassel, percentage of plants that produced marketable ears, average weight, length and diameter of ears were determined in this trial.

Plants treated by Acuron at 2.5 qt/A had the highest height of the upmost leaf (1.41 m), followed by plants treated with Anthem at 10 oz/A (1.40 m) and Laudis at 3 oz/A (1.36 m). Plants treated with Zidua had the lowest height of upmost leaf, reflecting the poor weed control obtained with that herbicide. Similarly, the highest percentage of plants that produce marketable ears was observed in plots treated with Acuron and Anthem at around 90%. Plants treated with Laudis and Accent had slightly lower percentage around 80%.

Ear quality data correspond with plant height data. Ears in plots treated with Acuron, Anthem and Laudis had the highest average weight and average ear diameter. There was less difference in average ear length among treatments. This is because ears were harvested only when the tips were fully filled and this happens only after the ear has reached a certain length.

Herbicide residue effect on winter weeds and cover crops: After harvest, it is common practice to plant winter cover crops to reduce erosion, improve soil quality and suppress weeds. Herbicides applied during the growing season may have a residual effect on winter annual weeds and negatively affect the growth of the winter cover crop.

We observed a slight difference in cover crop performance among treatments on November 19th, but the effect was not significant. On December 30th, the spread in treatment effect enlarged and the best cover crop performance was observed in plots treated by Acuron at the high rate or by Accent. However, data were still not significant.

Five months after application, herbicide treatment still largely influenced the weed community. The lowest weed densities were observed in plots treated with Zidua. Plots treated with Acuron had a relatively high weed population, even though weeds were well controlled during the growing season (Table 3 and Figure 3).

It is worth noting that cover crop growth is not a single consequence of herbicide

residue. It is also influenced by weed competition and other environmental factors. Regardless, our preliminary data indicate that application of tested herbicides have positive effects on cover crop performance compared to performance in the non-treated controls.

33

3

Conclusion

Early crop injury was noted in plants treated with Aim and Anthem. The crop recovered by mid-August, three weeks after the post-emergence treatment. Acuron consistently controlled all weeds in sweet corn. Anthem provided fair control of purslane, crabgrass and fall panicum. Zidua failed to control weeds during the growing season, but had the highest residual effect on winter weeds.

Sweet corn treated with Acuron, Anthem and Laudis had the best overall performance as determined by height of the upmost leaf, percentage of plants that produce marketable ears and ear quality. The performance of plants treated by Zidua was least satisfactory.

Tested herbicides had a residual effect on winter weed population and cover crop performance. Acuron had the least residual effect on winter weed densities while Zidua had the greatest effect. We can conclude that application of tested herbicides had a positive effect on cover crops compared to the non-treated control.

Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank Ohio Vegetable & Small Fruit Research & Development Program and Maurer Farms.

34

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=41,42

(2015 CH Sweet corn) ARM 2014.8 AOV Means Table Page 1


Evaluation of New Herbicides for Weed Control and Crop Safety in Sweet Corn

Trial ID: 2015 CH Sweet corn Location: Maurers Farm Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: 2015 CH Sweet corn Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director:

Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code POROL POROLPart Rated PLANT C PLALIV P PLANT C PLALIV P PLANT C PLALIV P PLALIV P PLANT C PLALIV PRating Date Jul-16-2015 Jul-16-2015 Jul-23-2015 Jul-23-2015 Jul-30-2015 Jul-30-2015 Jul-30-2015 Aug-6-2015 Aug-6-2015

Rating Type PHYGEN PESCON PHYGEN PESCON PHYGEN PESCON PESCON PHYGEN PESCONRating Unit %UNCK %UNCK %UNCK %UNCK %UNCK %UNCK %UNCK %UNCK %UNCK

Trt Treatment RateNo. Name Rate Unit 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 Hand weeded 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

2 Anthem 8 oz/a 16 b 92 a 52 a 19 a 83 abcMSO 1.5 pt/a

3 Anthem 10 oz/a 19 b 95 a 66 a 20 a 88 abMSO 1.5 pt/a

4 Zidua 2 oz/a 1 c 5 c 44 a 0 b 2 d

5 Zidua 3 oz/a 0 c 17 c 53 a 0 b 11 d

6 AIM EC 0.75 oz/a 28 a 85 a 51 a 13 a 78 abcNIS 0.25 % v/v

7 Accent 0.667 oz/a 0 c 42 b 39 a 0 b 65 bcCOC 1 % v/vAmmonium Sulfate 2 lb/a

8 Acuron 2.5 qt/a 1 a 99 a 0 100 0 c 100 a 100 a 0 b 100 aNIS 0.25 % v/v

9 Acuron 3 qt/a 4 a 99 a 1 99 3 c 99 a 100 a 0 b 99 aNIS 0.25 % v/v

10 Laudis 3 oz/a 0 c 60 b 69 a 0 b 47 cMSO 1 % v/vAmmonium Sulfate 1.5 lb/a

LSD P=.05 4.6 6.5 . . 6.4 15.5t 40.0t 8.4t 17.8tStandard Deviation 2.0 2.9 . . 4.4 10.6t 27.4t 5.7t 12.2t

35



POROLPLALIV P PLALIV P PLANT C PLALIV P PLALIV P PLALIV P PLANT C PLALIV P PLANT C

Aug-6-2015 Aug-6-2015 Aug-14-2015 Aug-14-2015 Aug-14-2015 Aug-14-2015 Aug-14-2015 Sep-3-2015 Sep-3-2015

PESCON PESCON PHYGEN PESCON PESCON PESCON VIGOR PESCON VIGOR%UNCK %UNCK %UNCK

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100

31 a 59 b 1 a 87 ab 39 a 54 b 113 ab 19 b 124 ab

55 a 77 b 1 a 88 ab 59 a 75 ab 138 a 69 b 143 a

58 a 6 d 0 a 3 d 70 a 9 c 96 b 10 b 103 b

47 a 15 cd 0 a 6 d 60 a 15 c 109 ab 19 b 119 ab

33 a 66 b 1 a 70 bc 46 a 56 b 115 ab 28 b 126 ab

45 a 60 b 0 a 50 c 60 a 55 b 116 ab 48 b 130 ab

100 a 100 a 0 a 98 a 98 a 96 a 125 ab 100 a 141 a

97 a 99 a 0 a 100 a 91 a 98 a 120 ab 99 a 129 ab

62 a 42 bc 0 a 37 c 56 a 43 bc 119 ab 37 b 133 a

41.0t 18.0t 0.7t 16.2t 38.3 28.1 20.4 26.9t 18.728.1t 12.3t 0.5t 11.1t 26.2 19.3 14.0 18.4t 12.8

Pest CodePart RatedRating Date

Rating TypeRating Unit


1 Hand weeded

2 Anthem 8 oz/aMSO 1.5 pt/a


4 Zidua 2 oz/a

5 Zidua 3 oz/a

6 AIM EC 0.75 oz/aNIS 0.25 % v/v

7 Accent 0.667 oz/aCOC 1 % v/vAmmonium Sulfate 2 lb/a

8 Acuron 2.5 qt/aNIS 0.25 % v/v

9 Acuron 3 qt/aNIS 0.25 % v/v

10 Laudis 3 oz/aMSO 1 % v/vAmmonium Sulfate 1.5 lb/a


36



LEATOP C LEATOP c LEATOP c LEATOP c LEATOP c LEATOP c LEATOP c LEATOP cSep-10-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-10-2015

HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHTFT FT FT FT FT FT FT FT

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3

4 a 4 ab 4 a 4 a 4 a 4 a 4 ab 4 ab

4 a 5 ab 5 a 5 a 5 a 4 a 5 a 5 a

3 b 4 b 3 a 4 a 4 a 3 4 b 3 b

4 ab 4 ab 4 a 4 a 4 a 5 a 4 b 4 ab

4 a 4 ab 4 4 a 4 a 4 a 4 ab 4 a

4 ab 4 ab 4 a 4 a 4 a 4 a 4 ab 4 ab

5 a 5 a 5 a 4 a 5 a 5 a 5 a 5 a

4 a 4 ab 4 a 4 a 4 a 4 a 4 ab 5 a

4 a 4 ab 4 a 4 a 5 a 5 a 5 ab 5 a

0.6 0.7 1.0 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.60.4 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4




1 Hand weeded



4 Zidua 2 oz/a

5 Zidua 3 oz/a







37



LEATOP c LEATOP c PLINRO C EARTOT C EARMAR C EARMAR C EAR C EAR CSep-10-2015 Sep-10-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015

HEIGHT HEIGHT COUNT COUNT COUNT WEIFRE LENGTH DIAMETFT FT g cm mm

27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

3 3 25 35 13 2750 23 52

4 a 4 ab 24 a 34 a 18 a 4968 abc 24 b 53 ab

5 a 4 a 26 a 41 a 24 a 6889 a 25 ab 56 ab

3 b 3 b 25 a 28 a 11 a 2225 c 19 c 46 b

4 ab 4 ab 23 a 34 a 14 a 3388 bc 23 b 50 ab

4 ab 5 23 a 32 a 17 a 4458 abc 24 b 53 ab

4 a 4 ab 25 a 36 a 20 a 4912 abc 25 ab 51 ab

5 a 5 a 23 a 36 a 20 a 5847 ab 24 ab 56 ab

5 a 4 a 23 a 37 a 20 a 5812 ab 29 a 58 a

4 a 4 a 24 a 36 a 20 a 5833 ab 25 ab 55 ab

0.7 0.6 4.7 8.3 7.3 2072.3 3.3 6.20.4 0.4 3.2 5.7 5.0 1419.9 2.3 4.3




1 Hand weeded



4 Zidua 2 oz/a

5 Zidua 3 oz/a







38



EAR C EAR C EAR C EAR C EAR C EAR C EAR C EAR CSep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015 Sep-23-2015

LENGTH DIAMET LENGTH DIAMET LENGTH DIAMET LENGTH DIAMETcm mm cm mm cm mm cm mm

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

22 52 22 54 21 52 20 48

25 a 55 a 21 ab 49 a 24 abc 52 a 24 a 53 a

24 a 54 a 25 ab 55 a 23 abc 51 a 26 a 58 a

22 a 49 a 20 b 49 a 20 c 51 a 21 a 52 a

22 a 50 a 22 ab 51 a 21 bc 49 21 a 50 a

23 a 51 a 24 ab 53 a 23 abc 50 a 24 a 56 a

24 a 51 a 25 ab 54 a 24 abc 55 a 24 a 54 a

25 a 54 a 25 ab 57 a 25 abc 53 a 23 a 54 a

25 a 54 a 26 a 56 a 27 a 57 a 25 a 55 a

24 a 53 a 25 ab 55 a 26 ab 54 a 24 a 53 a

4.0 5.8 3.5 5.7 3.4 5.7 3.1 4.62.7 4.0 2.4 3.9 2.3 3.9 2.1 3.1




1 Hand weeded



4 Zidua 2 oz/a

5 Zidua 3 oz/a







39



- C - P - CNov-19-2015 Dec-30-2015 Dec-30-2015

VIGOR DENSIT VIGOR%UNCK %UNCK %UNCK

43 44 45

100 100 100

101 a 49 a 123 a

105 a 59 a 119 a

108 a 48 a 115 a

113 a 45 a 123 a

109 a 80 a 115 a

110 a 60 a 128 a

106 a 85 a 114 a

109 a 70 a 129 a

103 a 58 a 119 a

13.3 34.0 17.49.1 23.3 11.9

Pest CodePart RatedRating DateRating TypeRating Unit


1 Hand weeded



4 Zidua 2 oz/a

5 Zidua 3 oz/a







40



Evaluation of New Herbicides for Weed Control and Crop Safety in Sweet Corn

Trial ID: 2015 CH Sweet corn Location: Maurers Farm Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: 2015 CH Sweet corn Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director:

Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code POROL, Portulaca oleracea, = USPart Rated PLANT = plant PLALIV = plant - living LEATOP = leaf - top PLINRO = plant - in row EARTOT = ear - total EARMAR = ear - marketable EAR = ear C = Crop is Part Rated P = Pest is Part RatedRating Type PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injury PESCON = pest control VIGOR = vigor HEIGHT = height COUNT = count WEIFRE = weight - fresh LENGTH = length DIAMET = diameter DENSIT = densityRating Unit %UNCK = percent of untreated check FT = foot g = gram cm = centimeter mm = millimeter

41

(P11600) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 1


CLOPYRALID: NATURE OF PERFORMANCE ON ONION (DRY BULB) (FIRST YEAR)

Trial ID: P11600 Location: CELERYVILLE, OH Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: P11600 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Rick Edwards

Sponsor Contact:




Initiation Date: May-5-2015Completion Date: Oct-30-2015

Trial LocationCity: Celeryville Country: USA United States



Objectives:

Collect crop safety data for performance of Clopyralid in Dry Bulb Onion. Applications at 0.94 lb ai/acre and 0.188 lb ai/acre were applied at the 4 leaf stage and 6 days after first application. These treatments were compared to the local standard, Goaltender (oxyfluorofen) at 2 or 4 oz/A.

Conclusions:

The entire trial received a PRE treatment of Buctril (bromoxynil) at 10 oz/acre and Prowl H2O (pendimethalin) at 4 qt/acre just before crop emergence on May 20, 2015. Treatments 2 - 5 also received two separate applications of Goaltender (oxyfluorofen) at 2 oz/acre at approximately 3 leaf crop stage (June 19, 2015) and at the 5 leaf stage (July 2, 2015) as a maintenance spray. The untreated plots were hand weeded.Phytotoxicity to crop ratings were collected at 6 days after the first treatment and 11 and 19 days after the second treatment. A stand count of a representative length of row in each plot was taken on the first day of treatment and at the harvest. Fresh weights as well as a dry weights were recorded for each plot. There were no differences in crop damage at 6 Days After Treatment A (DAT A) or 11 DAT B. At 19 DAT B the 0.188 lb ai/A Clopyralid treatment showed a higher level of phytotoxicity compared to other treatments. The sypmtoms were chlorosis of the tips and twisting of the leaves. There were no differences in dry weight or stand counts in any treatment.








42



Crop 1: ALLXS Allium cepa (direct-seeded) Direct seeded onionVariety: YELLOW SPANISH BBCH Scale: BVBT

Planting Date: May-7-2015Planting Rate, Unit: 545447 S/A Planting Method: DRILLE drilled

Depth, Unit: 0.75 IN Planting Equipment: DD Disc DrillRow Spacing, Unit: 18 IN Emergence Date: May-21-2015

Spacing Within Row, Unit: 2.3 IN Harvest Date: Sep-16-2015 Harvested Width, Unit: 36 IN

Harvested Length, Unit: 15 FT Harvest Equipment: Hand

Site and DesignTreated Plot Width: 10 FT Site Type: FIELD field

Treated Plot Length: 20 FT Experimental Unit: 1 PLOT plotTreated Plot Area: 200 FT2 Treatments: 5 Tillage Type: CONTIL conventional-till


Field Prep./Maintenance:

Planter: Stanhay Singulaire 785 Precision Seeder. Diazinon AG500 applied in furrow for insect control at time of planting (May 7, 2015).

Soil DescriptionDescription Name: Muck

% Sand: 64 % OM: 47 Texture: MUCK muck% Silt: 31 pH: 5.4

% Clay: 5 CEC: 70.3

Moisture and Weather ConditionsOverall Moisture Conditions: SLIDRY slightly dry


A B

Application Date: Jun-26-2015 Jul-2-2015

Appl. Start Time: 11:00 11:00

Appl. Stop Time: 11:20 AM 11:20 AM



Air Temperature, Unit: 71.2 F 66 F

% Relative Humidity: 63 83

Wind Velocity, Unit: 9 MPH 7 MPH

Wind Direction: NE E

Soil Temperature, Unit: 72.9 F 65.6 F

Soil Moisture: SLIDRY DRY

Next Moisture Occurred On: Jun-27-2015 Jul-7-2015


A B

Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: ALLXS BVBT ALLXS BVBT

Stage Scale Used: BBCH BBCH

Stage Majority, Percent: 13 90 14 90

43


The Ohio State UniversityApplication Equipment

A B

Equipment Type: SPRAYE SPRAYE

Operation Pressure, Unit: 35 PSI 35 PSI

Nozzle Type: TEEJTU TEEJTU


Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 18 IN 18 IN

Nozzles/Row: 4 4

Nozzle Calibration, Unit: 24 OZ/MIN 24 OZ/MIN

Band Width, Unit: 60 IN 60 IN

% Coverage: 100.0 100.0

Boom Height, Unit: 20 IN 20 IN

Ground Speed, Unit: 3 MPH 3 MPH

Carrier: WATER WATER


Mix Size, Unit: 0.528 gallons 0.528 gallons

44

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=5,6

(P11600) ARM 2014.8 AOV Means Table Page 4


CLOPYRALID: NATURE OF PERFORMANCE ON ONION (DRY BULB) (FIRST YEAR)

Trial ID: P11600 Location: CELERYVILLE, OH Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: P11600 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Rick Edwards

Sponsor Contact:

Crop Code ALLXS ALLXS ALLXS ALLXSRating Date Jun-26-2015 Jul-2-2015 Jul-13-2015 Jul-21-2015 Sep-16-2015 Sep-16-2015 Sep-16-2015 Oct-1-2015 Oct-1-2015Rating Type CROPST PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN CROPST REDUCT WEIFRE WEIDRY WEIREDRating Unit NUMBER % % % NUMBER % kg/plot kg/plot kg/plotNumber of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Trt-Eval Interval 0 DA-A 6 DA-A 11 DA-B 19 DA-B 82 DA-A 82 DA-A 82 DA-A 97 DA-A 97 DA-ANumber of Decimals 2 2 2 2

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 BUCTRIL 10 fl oz/a A 46 2 0 0 34 0.18 7.80 5.53 2.27PROWL H20 4 qt/a A

2 STINGER 0.094 lb ae/a A 58 a 17 a 23 a 8 b 51 a 0.12 a 10.52 a 7.47 a 3.05 aSTINGER 0.094 lb ae/a B

3 STINGER 0.188 lb ae/a A 54 a 20 a 37 a 20 a 42 a 0.25 a 9.58 a 6.50 a 3.08 aSTINGER 0.188 lb ae/a B

4 GOALTENDER 2 fl oz/a AB 61 a 30 a 10 a 8 b 65 a 0.16 a 11.78 a 8.67 a 3.12 a

5 GOALTENDER 4 fl oz/a AB 54 17 a 23 a 5 b 51 a 0.05 a 13.35 a 9.14 a 4.21 a

LSD P=.05 35.6 14.5 21.3 9.3 23.0 0.183 10.707 7.629 3.200Standard Deviation 15.7 7.3 10.7 4.6 10.9 0.087 5.359 3.818 1.602

Crop Code ALLXS, BVBT, Allium cepa (direct-seeded), = USRating Type CROPST = cropstand PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injury REDUCT = reduction WEIFRE = weight - fresh WEIDRY = weight - dry / dry matter content WEIRED = weight reductionRating Unit NUMBER = number % = percent kg/plot = kilograms per plotARM Action Codes T1 = [C9]-[C10]

45

(AIM MFR12014) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 1


2014/2015/PASTURE/MULTI-FLORAL ROSE/AIM/TANKMIXES

Trial ID: AIM.MFR 2014 Location: Coshocton, Ohio Trial Year: 2014Protocol ID: Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Richard Edwards

Sponsor Contact:

General Trial InformationStudy Director: Rick Edwards Title: Research Associate



Completion Date: Sep-15-2015


Objectives:

To observe control of Multiflora Rose with AIM and AIM tankmixes applied on a naturally occuring population of Multi-flora Rose at new growth up to flowering.

Conclusions:

In the first year of this trial there was good control of Multiflora Rose with all treatments throughout the trial. There was no differences in weed control between treatments. Control of Catchweed bedstraw, Virginia creeper and Flowering dogwood had diminished by 68 DAT. In year two, the prevalance of Mutliflora rose appeared to be less than the previous year. An assessment made at 406 Days after the first treatment showed similar control of Multiflora rose for each treatment. At 6 Days after treatment (DA-B) there were no difference in treatments for Multiflora rose control. At 16 DA-B the treatments had controlled Multiflora rose between 70 -88%. Woody creeping perennials, such as Japanese honeysuckle and American bittersweet were not affected by any treatment.

ContactsStudy Director: Rick Edwards Title: Research Associate

Organization: Ohio Agricultural Research and Development CenterAddress: 1680 Madison Avenue

City+State/Prov: Wooster, OhioPostal Code: 44691 E-mail: [email protected]





Pest DescriptionPest 1 Type: W Code: ROSMU Rosa multiflora

Common Name: Multiflora Rose

Pest 2 Type: W Code: LONJA Lonicera japonicaCommon Name: Japanese honeysuckle

Pest 3 Type: W Code: CRWFL Cornus floridaCommon Name: dogwood, flowering

Pest 4 Type: W Code: PRTQU Parthenocissus quinquefoliaCommon Name: Virginia-creeper

46

(AIM MFR12014) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 2


Treated Plot Width: 5 FTTreated Plot Length: 10 FT

Treated Plot Area: 50 FT2 Treatments: 4Replications: 4 Study Design: COMRAN Completely Randomized (CRD)


A B

Application Date: Jul-2-2014 Aug-12-2015

Appl. Start Time: 10:00 10:30

Appl. Stop Time: 10:30 AM 11:00 AM


Application Timing: JULY AUGUST

Application Placement: BROFOL BROFOL

Air Temperature, Unit: 80 F 72.1 F

% Relative Humidity: 71.45 77

Wind Velocity, Unit: 2.6 MPH 3.2 MPH

Wind Direction: SW W

Dew Presence (Y/N): N no N no

Soil Moisture: DRY DRY

% Cloud Cover: 20 20

Next Moisture Occurred On: Jul-7-2014 Aug-19-2015

Time to Next Moisture, Unit: 5 DAY 7 DAY

Pest Stage At Each Application

A B

Pest 1 Code, Type, Scale: ROSMU W ROSMU W

Height, Unit: 20 IN 36 IN

Pest 2 Code, Type, Scale: LONJA W LONJA W


Pest 3 Code, Type, Scale: CRWFL W CRWFL W


Pest 4 Code, Type, Scale: PRTQU W PRTQU W



A B

Equipment Type: BACCAI BACCAI

Operation Pressure, Unit: 30 PSI 30 PSI


Nozzles/Row: 1 1

% Coverage: 100.0 100.0



47

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=2,3,4,5,7,8,10,11,13,14,21,22,24Excluded replicate 3 in column 20

(AIM MFR12014) ARM 2014.8 AOV Means Table Page 3




Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code ROSMU LONJA CRWFL GALAP PRTQU ROSMU MORNI LONJAPart Rated PLANT P PLANT P PLANT P PLANT P PLANT P PLANT P PLANT P PLANT pRating Date Jul-16-2014 Jul-16-2014 Jul-16-2014 Jul-16-2014 Jul-16-2014 Jul-30-2014 Jul-30-2014 Jul-30-2014

Rating Type CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROLRating Unit % % % % % % % %Number of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Trt-Eval Interval 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 28 DA-A 28 DA-A 28 DA-A


1 UNTREATED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 AIM 1.5 oz/a AB 65 a 20 a 78 a 63 a 50 a 62 a 31 aCOC 1 % v/v AB

3 ALLY XP 0.25 oz/a AB 43 a 17 a 63 a 53 a 43 a 73 a 55 a 58 aNIS 0.25 % v/v AB

4 AIM 1.5 oz/a AB 63 a 14 a 90 a 63 a 71 a 76 a 57 a 38 aALLY XP 0.25 oz/a ABNIS 0.25 % v/v AB

LSD P=.05 26.4 0.6t 38.2 25.9 30.3 35.7 52.9 68.0Standard Deviation 16.5 0.3t 17.0 15.9 18.6 22.3 29.1 41.7

48



GALAP CRWFL PRTQU ROSMU GALAP PRTQU CRWFL ROSMU- p

Jul-30-2014 Jul-30-2014 Jul-30-2014 Sep-8-2014 Sep-8-2014 Sep-8-2014 Sep-8-2014 Aug-12-2015

CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL% % % % % %1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

28 DA-A 28 DA-A 28 DA-A 68 DA-A 68 DA-A 68 DA-A 68 DA-A 407 DA-A

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

81 a 95 a 58 a 52 a 4 a 30 a 35 a

34 b 60 a 28 a 87 a 3 a 20 a 38 65 a

63 ab 30 a 63 a 86 a 1 a 28 a 30 38 a

31.4 60.9 47.4 22.5t 1.1t 26.7 . 62.319.6 27.1 26.1 14.0t 0.7t 14.7 . 39.0


Rating TypeRating UnitNumber of SubsamplesTrt-Eval Interval


1 UNTREATED

2 AIM 1.5 oz/a ABCOC 1 % v/v AB

3 ALLY XP 0.25 oz/a ABNIS 0.25 % v/v AB

4 AIM 1.5 oz/a ABALLY XP 0.25 oz/a ABNIS 0.25 % v/v AB


49



CRWFL COMCO LONJA ROSMU CELSC CRWFL LONJA

Aug-12-2015 Aug-12-2015 Aug-12-2015 Aug-18-2015 Aug-18-2015 Aug-18-2015 Aug-18-2015

CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL

1 1 1 1 1 1 1407 DA-A 407 DA-A 407 DA-A 6 DA-B 6 DA-B 6 DA-B 6 DA-B

17 18 19 20 21 22 23

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 a 75 a 0 a 63 a 33 a 93 a 5 a

0 a 75 a 0 a 53 a 15 a 60 b 0 a

0 a 25 0 a 90 a 18 a 88 a 8 a

0.0 86.5 0.0 35.9 39.9 21.4 7.10.0 50.0 0.0 18.0 23.1 12.8 4.4




1 UNTREATED





50



COMCO ROSMU LONJA CRWFL CELSC COMCO

Aug-18-2015 Aug-28-2015 Aug-28-2015 Aug-28-2015 Aug-28-2015 Aug-28-2015

CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL

1 1 1 1 1 16 DA-B 16 DA-B 16 DA-B 16 DA-B 16 DA-B 16 DA-B

24 25 26 27 28 29

0 0 0 0 0 0

30 a 70 a 20 a 98 a 1 a 97 a

40 a 80 a 53 a 85 a 0 a 96 a

57 a 88 a 43 a 90 a 2 a 72 a

64.8 25.4 43.1 14.8 0.9t 36.5t24.9 15.9 27.0 9.3 0.6t 22.8t




1 UNTREATED





51





Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code ROSMU, Rosa multiflora, = US LONJA, Lonicera japonica, = US CRWFL, Cornus florida, = US GALAP, Galium aparine, = US PRTQU, Parthenocissus quinquefolia, = US MORNI, Morus nigra, = US COMCO, Commelina communis, = US CELSC, Celastrus scandens, = USPart Rated PLANT = plant P = Pest is Part RatedRating Unit % = percent

52

(SULF.2X RATE 2014) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 1


A PLANT BACK TRIAL OF AUTHORITY APPLIED AT 2X RATE PREVIOUS SEASON

Trial ID: SULF.2X PLANTBACK Location: FREMONT Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Richard Edwards

Sponsor Contact:

General Trial InformationStudy Director: Doug Doohan/Rick Edwards Title: Professor/Research Assistant



Initiation Date: Jun-18-2014 Planned Completion Date: Dec-26-2015Completion Date: Jul-20-2015

Trial LocationCity: Fremont Country: USA United States

State/Prov.: Ohio


Objectives:

Evaluate the carrover phytotoxicity of Authority MTZ applied the prior season at a 2X recommended field rate on 4 vegetables. In 2014 Authority MTZ at was inadvertently applied at approximately 27 and 31 ounces per acre in a pre-transplant situation in tomatoes. At the 7 day post transplant assessment, due to excessive toxicity to the transplant, it was discovered that this error was due to an incorrect formulation. That trial was discontinued and the plants were plowed under. In this trial, the potential for carryover of this herbicide to cause damage in vegetables was evaluated. The vegetables used were transplanted cabbage, seeded cucumber, seeded pumpkin and seeded sweet corn.

Conclusions:

There were no differences in the damage seen in any crop for any of the treatments in this trial. Cucumber showed the most damage, between 8% and 31 % at 15 days following planting (DA-P) and also between 28% and 50% on 33 DA-P, depending on treatment. Pumpkin had similar damage, between 1 % to 27% at 15 DA-P and 17% - 37% at 33 DA-P. Both cucumber and pumpkin continued to show high damage at 53 DA-P, 20%- 43% for pumpkin and 20%- 38% for cucumber. Sweet corn also showed between 13% - 38% damage at 15 DA-P, and 10%- 20% damage at 33 DA-P and 3%- 33 % on 54 DA-P. Cabbage showed very little damage, between 0% and 9% damage throughout the trial, depending on treatment.

ContactsStudy Director: Doug Doohan/Rick Edwards Title: Professor/Research Assistant

Organization: OARDC/The Ohio State UniversityAddress: 1680 Madison Ave.



Crop DescriptionCrop 1: CUUSS Cucurbita sp. PumpkinVariety: Howden BBCH Scale: BVVT

Planting Date: May-21-2015

Crop 2: CUMSS Cucumis sp. CucumberVariety: Valaspik BBCH Scale: BVVT


Crop 3: ZEAMS Zea mays saccharata Sweet cornVariety: Obsession BBCH Scale: BCOR


Crop 4: BRSOL Brassica oleracea capitata alb Head cabbage BBCH Scale: BVHF


53

(SULF.2X RATE 2014) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 2





Soil DescriptionDescription Name: Fremont

% Sand: 50 % OM: 2.5 Texture: LFS loamy fine sand% Silt: 40 pH: 7

% Clay: 10 CEC: 9.3


A B

Application Date: Jun-18-2014 May-21-2015




Application Timing: PREPLA



A B

Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: CUUSS BVVT CUUSS BVVT

Crop 2 Code, BBCH Scale: CUMSS BVVT CUMSS BVVT

Crop 3 Code, BBCH Scale: ZEAMS BCOR ZEAMS BCOR

Crop 4 Code, BBCH Scale: BRSOL BVHF BRSOL BVHF

54

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=9,10,11,12

(SULF.2X RATE 2014) ARM 2014.8 AOV Means Table Page 3




Sponsor Contact:

Crop Code CUUSS CUMSS ZEAMS BRSOL CUUSS CUMSS ZEAMS BRSOLRating Date Jun-5-2015 Jun-5-2015 Jun-5-2015 Jun-5-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015

Rating Type PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGENNumber of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Trt-Eval Interval 15 DA-P 15 DA-P 15 DA-P 15 DA-P 33 DA-P 33 DA-P 33 DA-P 33 DA-P


1 UNTREATED 0 0 0 0 3 8 3 5

2 AUTHORITY MTZ 12 oz ai/a A 1 a 12 a 8 a 1 a 19 a 43 a 5 a 9 aSENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B

3 AUTHORITY MTZ 14 oz ai/a A 3 a 21 a 11 a 1 a 17 a 28 a 2 a 0 aSENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B

4 AUTHORITY MTZ 12 oz ai/a A 2 a 8 a 16 a 0 a 28 a 50 a 2 a 5 aDUAL II MAGNUM 16 oz/a ASENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B

5 AUTHORITY MTZ 14 oz ai/a A 14 a 31 a 33 a 3 a 36 a 50 a 5 a 2 aDUAL II MAGNUM 1.3 pt/a ASENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B

6 SPARTAN CHARGE 4.5 oz ai/a A 27 a 14 a 34 a 1 a 37 a 45 a 9 a 2 aDUAL II MAGNUM 1.3 pt/a ASENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B

LSD P=.05 1.1t 4.7t 4.0t 0.8t 3.5t 42.4 1.1t 1.0tStandard Deviation 0.7t 3.0t 2.6t 0.5t 2.3t 27.5 0.7t 0.6t

55



CUUSS CUMSS ZEAMS BRSOLJul-13-2015 Jul-13-2015 Jul-13-2015 Jul-13-2015

PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN1 1 1 1

53 DA-P 53 DA-P 53 DA-P 53 DA-P

9 10 11 12

0 0 0 0

20 a 38 a 33 a 12 a

20 a 38 a 18 a 1 a

43 a 33 a 13 a 9 a

27 a 30 a 3 a 1 a

27 a 20 a 10 a 0 a

30.5 56.2 31.6 1.2t19.1 35.1 19.7 0.7t

Crop CodeRating Date

Rating TypeNumber of SubsamplesTrt-Eval Interval


1 UNTREATED

2 AUTHORITY MTZ 12 oz ai/a ASENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B

3 AUTHORITY MTZ 14 oz ai/a ASENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B

4 AUTHORITY MTZ 12 oz ai/a ADUAL II MAGNUM 16 oz/a ASENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B

5 AUTHORITY MTZ 14 oz ai/a ADUAL II MAGNUM 1.3 pt/a ASENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B

6 SPARTAN CHARGE 4.5 oz ai/a ADUAL II MAGNUM 1.3 pt/a ASENCOR 2 oz/a BMATRIX 1 oz/a BNIS 0.25 % v/v B


56





Sponsor Contact:

Crop Code CUUSS, BVVT, Cucurbita sp., = US CUMSS, BVVT, Cucumis sp., = US ZEAMS, BCOR, Zea mays saccharata, = US BRSOL, BVHF, Brassica oleracea capitata alb, = USRating Type PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injury

57

Dec-21-2015 (CLOM.PUM.15.JPR.02) ARM 2014.7 Site Description Page 1


2015/PUMPKIN/VARIETY/CLOMAZONE/OH,PA

Trial ID: CLOM.PUM.15.JPR.02 Location: WOOSTER, OH Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: CLOM.PUM.15.JPR.02 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Rick Edwards

Sponsor Contact:



Discipline: H herbicideTrial Status: F one-year/final

Initiation Date: Jul-9-2015Completion Date: Oct-21-2015


State/Prov.: OhioPostal Code: 44691 Climate Zone: EPPONE EPPO North East


Objectives:

Observe Command 3ME applied Pre-Plant Broadcast in 4 pumpkin varieties.

Conclusions:

Pumpkins were seeded on July 9th, 2015, two seeds per hill at 2 feet between hills.Rows were 10 feet apart. Germination was nearly 100% and plants were thinned to 1 plant per hill on August 6th.The treatment was applied immediately after seeding. At the 2 leaf stage, at 13 Days After Treatment (DAT), there was between 5-20% damage. This was manifested by chlorosis and some necrosis on edges of leaves and cotyledons. Cotyledons also showed signs of cupping. There was no difference between varieties. At 22 DAT damage was between 0 - 10%. Chlorosis on the lower leaves and dry leaf tips were seen, as well as malformation of newer leaves on a plant in plot 101 (var. Apollo). By 28 DAT there was very few plants showing phytotoxic effects. At the time of flowering, approximately 60 DAT, plants were observed and rated in general appearance on a scale of 1-5. There was no phytotoxicity, and the plants were all doing well, with several flower buds forming or already in bloom. On October 19th at around 5:45 AM there was a low temperature of around 26 degrees F. On October 21, 2015 all the pumpkins were harvested and weighed by plot. Also each plot was given a percentage rate of visual color per plot, meaning how much the pumpkins resembled the ideal orange color preferred for market. The variety Howden Biggie and Apollo had lower percentage of orange fruit than Gladiator and Field Trip. Howden Biggie also had fruit that was misshapen, and rotten. For instance: in plot 103, three of four pumpkins were rotten, the other was misshapen. In plot 202, there were rotted pumpkins and one had a malformed handle.





Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Title: ProfessorOrganization: OARDC/The Ohio State University

Address: 1680 Madison Ave.City+State/Prov: Wooster, Ohio

Postal Code: 44691

58



Crop 1: CUUSS Cucurbita sp. PumpkinVariety: APOLLO BBCH Scale: BVVT

Planting Date: Jul-9-2015

Crop 2: CUUSS Cucurbita sp. PumpkinVariety: HOWDEN BIGGIE BBCH Scale: BVVT


Crop 3: CUUSS Cucurbita sp. PumpkinVariety: GLADIATOR BBCH Scale: BVVT


Crop 4: CUUSS Cucurbita sp. PumpkinVariety: FIELD TRIP BBCH Scale: BVVT





Soil DescriptionDescription Name: Wooster Silt Loam

% Sand: 17 % OM: 2.8 Texture: CSL clay sandy loam% Silt: 72 pH: 6.4

% Clay: 12 CEC: 5.6


A

Application Date: Jul-9-2015

Appl. Start Time: 12:30 PM



Application Timing: PREMCR


Applied By: R. Edwards




Wind Direction: S



Soil Moisture: DRY

% Cloud Cover: 90

Next Moisture Occurred On: Jul-9-2015

Time to Next Moisture, Unit: 2 HR


A

Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: CUUSS BVVT




59



A

Appl. Equipment: C02 4NZ

Equipment Type: BACCAI


Nozzle Type: TEEJET

Nozzle Size: 8002

Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 18 IN

Nozzles/Row: 4

Nozzle Calibration, Unit: 0.02 ML/MIN


% Coverage: 100

Ground Speed, Unit: 3.4 MPH


Mix Size, Unit: 0.528 gallons

60

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.

Dec-21-2015 (CLOM.PUM.15.JPR.02) ARM 2014.7 AOV Means Table Page 4


2015/PUMPKIN/VARIETY/CLOMAZONE/OH,PA

Trial ID: CLOM.PUM.15.JPR.02 Location: WOOSTER, OH Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: CLOM.PUM.15.JPR.02 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Rick Edwards

Sponsor Contact:

Crop Code CUUSS CUUSS CUUSS CUUSS CUUSS CUUSSRating Date Jul-22-2015 Jul-31-2015 Aug-6-2015 Aug-18-2015 Oct-21-2015 Oct-21-2015Rating Type PHYGEN PHYGEN PHYGEN APPEAR YIELD COLGRARating Unit 0-100 0-100 0-100 0-5 kg/plot %ABSCrop Stage Majority 12 16 51Trt-Eval Interval 13 DA-A 22 DA-A 28 DA-A 40 DA-A 104 DA-A 104 DA-A

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code 1 2 3 4 5 6

1 COMMAND 21 oz/a A 10 a 5 a 3 a 4 a 16 a 12 bAPOLLO

2 COMMAND 21 oz/a A 12 a 3 a 2 a 4 a 19 a 10 bHOWDEN BIGGIE

3 COMMAND 21 oz/a A 15 a 10 a 7 a 4 a 15 a 50 abGLADIATOR

4 COMMAND 21 oz/a A 12 a 5 a 2 a 4 a 7 a 97 aFIELD TRIP

LSD P=.05 13.0 6.4 5.8 1.9 16.4 51.6Standard Deviation 6.5 3.2 2.9 1.0 8.2 25.8

Replicate F 3.295 2.600 1.000 0.273 2.622 0.434Replicate Prob(F) 0.1082 0.1537 0.4219 0.7703 0.1520 0.6668Treatment F 0.311 2.400 2.000 0.091 1.215 7.487Treatment Prob(F) 0.8169 0.1664 0.2156 0.9624 0.3824 0.0188

Crop Code CUUSS, BVVT, Cucurbita sp., = USRating Type PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injury APPEAR = appearance, general YIELD = yield COLGRA = color gradeRating Unit 0-100 = 0-100 index/scale-percent 0-5 = 0-5 index/scale kg/plot = kilograms per plot %ABS = percent absoluteCrop Stage Majority 12 = 2nd true leaf on main stem fully unfolded 16 = 6th true leaf on main stem fully unfolded 51 = First flower initial with elongated ovary visible on main stem

61

(SULF.RAS.15.JPR.02) ARM 2014.7 Site Description Page 1


2015/AIM/ZEUS XC/RASPBERRY

Trial ID: SULF.RAS.15.JPR.02 Location: WOOSTER, OH Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: SULF.RAS.15.JPR.02 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. DoohanProject ID: Study Director: Rick Edwards

Sponsor Contact:

General Trial InformationStudy Director: Rick Edwards


Discipline: H herbicideTrial Status: F one-year/final

Initiation Date: May-6-2015Completion Date: Sep-1-2015


Objectives:

Comparing herbicide treatments applied as a directed post spray on efficacacy and crop tolerance in raspberries. Determine the length of weed control, and level of crop damage.

Conclusions:

In regards to control of Oxalis the best treatments in this trial were AIM/Alion and AIM/Callisto. The former showed a 82 – 100% control from 5/15/2015 to 6/23/2015. The latter showed 98 -100% control of Oxalis in this time period. The worst treatment for control of Oxalis was Spartan Charge/Surflan which had 72% - 89 % control.

For the control of Thistle, the best treatments were AIM/Alion (75%- 90%), Solicam/Matrix (80% – 83%) and AIM/Callisto (86%-83%). The worst treatment for Thistle control was Spartan Charge/Surflan (65%- 70%) and Spartan Charge/Sinbar (60%-78%). We like this treatment, however, because it shows lower phytotoxicity and control of Thistle was midway of all treatments.

ContactsStudy Director: Rick Edwards








A

Application Date: May-6-2015


Application Timing: MAY

Application Placement: BANDIR

62

(SULF.RAS.15.JPR.02) ARM 2014.7 Site Description Page 2


A



Nozzle Size: 8003

Nozzles/Row: 4

63

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.Excluded replicate 1 in column 5

(SULF.RAS.15.JPR.02) ARM 2014.7 AOV Means Table Page 3




Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code SOOAL CIRAR OXAST CARPE AGRRE SOOALCrop Code RUBUS RUBUSRating Date May-15-2015 May-15-2015 May-15-2015 May-15-2015 May-15-2015 May-15-2015 Jun-2-2015 Jun-2-2015

Rating Type PHYGEN CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO PHYGEN CONTROTrt-Eval Interval 9 DA-A 9 DA-A 9 DA-A 9 DA-A 9 DA-A 9 DA-A 27 DA-A 27 DA-A


1 UNTREATED 8 0 0 0 0 0 11 0

2 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a A 17 ab 97 a 73 a 81 a 87 ab 1 a 13 a 98 aMATRIX 1 oz/a A

3 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a A 17 ab 90 a 65 a 72 a 80 ab 2 a 22 a 93 aSURFLAN 2 qt/a A

4 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a A 15 ab 52 a 60 a 79 a 95 a 4 a 15 a 76 aSINBAR 1 lb/a A

5 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a A 5 b 96 a 83 a 66 a 100 a 1 a 4 a 89 aSOLICAM 1 lb/a A

6 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a A 23 ab 94 a 70 81 a 97 a 2 a 15 a 99 aSTINGER 4 oz/a A

7 AIM 1 oz/a A 25 ab 92 a 75 a 82 a 87 ab 4 a 24 a 99 aALION 3.5 oz/a A

8 AIM 1 oz/a A 32 a 71 a 88 a 99 a 100 a 6 a 30 a 69 aCALLISTO 3 oz/a A

9 SOLICAM 1 lb/a A 7 b 67 a 83 a 82 a 60 b 8 a 12 a 94 aMATRIX 1 oz/a A

10 AIM 1 oz/a A 9 ab 92 a 81 a 95 a 87 ab 19 a 15 a 85 aSOLICAM 1 lb/a AMATRIX 1 oz/a A

LSD P=.05 1.8t 27.5t 25.8 37.5t 21.0 1.2t 2.9t 39.0tStandard Deviation 1.2t 18.8t 17.6 25.7t 12.1 0.8t 2.0t 26.7t

Replicate F 1.417 4.755 3.997 4.922 1.890 1.434 0.731 1.328Replicate Prob(F) 0.2624 0.0097 0.0213 0.0084 0.1833 0.2575 0.5437 0.2884Treatment F 3.151 1.664 1.176 0.550 3.218 0.629 0.959 0.572Treatment Prob(F) 0.0139 0.1591 0.3578 0.8074 0.0222 0.7453 0.4894 0.7901

64



CIRAR OXAST GLEHE AGRRE CIRAR AGRASS SOOAL PLAMARUBUS

Jun-2-2015 Jun-2-2015 Jun-2-2015 Jun-2-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015

CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO PHYGEN CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO27 DA-A 27 DA-A 27 DA-A 27 DA-A 48 DA-A 48 DA-A 48 DA-A 48 DA-A 48 DA-A

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

0 0 0 0 13 13 0 0 0

83 a 84 a 76 a 4 a 23 a 80 a 22 a 95 a 97 a

78 a 81 a 54 a 1 a 28 a 70 a 4 ab 95 a 99 a

54 a 85 a 69 a 13 a 11 a 78 a 31 a 98 a 99 a

75 a 97 a 59 a 0 a 26 a 75 a 7 ab 93 a 95 a

94 a 93 a 74 a 2 a 30 a 88 a 0 b 98 a 93 a

93 a 99 a 93 a 1 a 28 a 90 a 13 ab 95 a 99 a

86 a 100 a 68 a 4 a 29 a 83 a 22 a 93 a 99 a

88 a 56 a 55 a 9 a 23 a 83 a 12 ab 90 a 92 a

59 a 91 a 61 a 12 a 30 a 83 a 5 ab 95 a 93 a

30.9 34.0t 44.7t 1.1t 19.5 25.5 2.4t 16.2 19.1t21.2 23.3t 30.6t 0.7t 13.4 17.5 1.6t 11.1 13.1t

1.624 2.380 2.864 0.922 3.938 2.587 24.028 1.509 2.5560.2102 0.0947 0.0578 0.4449 0.0204 0.0766 0.0001 0.2375 0.0790

1.789 1.097 0.315 1.162 0.781 0.492 3.484 0.192 0.6680.1292 0.3991 0.9524 0.3612 0.6232 0.8495 0.0083 0.9895 0.7138

Pest CodeCrop CodeRating Date

Rating TypeTrt-Eval Interval


1 UNTREATED

2 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a AMATRIX 1 oz/a A

3 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a ASURFLAN 2 qt/a A

4 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a ASINBAR 1 lb/a A

5 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a ASOLICAM 1 lb/a A

6 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a ASTINGER 4 oz/a A

7 AIM 1 oz/a AALION 3.5 oz/a A

8 AIM 1 oz/a ACALLISTO 3 oz/a A

9 SOLICAM 1 lb/a AMATRIX 1 oz/a A

10 AIM 1 oz/a ASOLICAM 1 lb/a AMATRIX 1 oz/a A



65



GLEHE OXAST

Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015

CONTRO CONTRO48 DA-A 48 DA-A

18 19

0 0

91 a 86 a

86 a 89 a

66 a 92 a

78 a 94 a

95 a 91 a

95 a 100 a

79 a 99 a

82 a 95 a

55 a 84 a

26.1t 20.1t17.9t 13.8t

1.301 2.4040.2970 0.0924

1.187 1.2640.3474 0.3073

Pest CodeCrop CodeRating Date

Rating TypeTrt-Eval Interval


1 UNTREATED

2 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a AMATRIX 1 oz/a A

3 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a ASURFLAN 2 qt/a A

4 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a ASINBAR 1 lb/a A

5 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a ASOLICAM 1 lb/a A

6 ZEUS PRIME XC 10 oz/a ASTINGER 4 oz/a A

7 AIM 1 oz/a AALION 3.5 oz/a A

8 AIM 1 oz/a ACALLISTO 3 oz/a A

9 SOLICAM 1 lb/a AMATRIX 1 oz/a A

10 AIM 1 oz/a ASOLICAM 1 lb/a AMATRIX 1 oz/a A



66





Sponsor Contact:

Pest Code SOOAL, Solidago altissima, = US CIRAR, Cirsium arvense, = US OXAST, Oxalis stricta, = US CARPE, Cardamine pensylvanica, = US AGRRE, Elymus repens, = US GLEHE, Glechoma hederacea, = US PLAMA, Plantago major, = USRating Type PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injury CONTRO = control / burndown or knockdown

67

Dec-21-2015 (P11079 2015) ARM 2014.7 Site Description Page 1


IR-4 Efficacy of Saflufenacil in Caneberry

Trial ID: P11079 (YEAR2) Location: HU2 OARDC Trial Year: 2015 Protocol ID: P11079 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Project ID: Study Director: Richard Edwards

Sponsor Contact: Dr. Marija Arsenovic

General Trial Information Study Director: Rick Edwards Title: Research Associate Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Title: Professor

Discipline: H herbicide Data Location: 44691 Trial Status: M multi-year/interim Trial Reliability: GOOD Initiation Date: Apr-9-2014

Trial Location City: Wooster Country: USA United States State/Prov.: Ohio OH Postal Code: 44691

USAOH 42.3271331 - 38.4034194 -80.5184478 - -84.8203125

Conducted Under GLP: No Conducted Under GEP: No

Keywords: Saflufenicil, IR4

Objectives:

To evaluate efficacy of a primocane burn and the impact on crop tolerance in raspberries, using a 4X rate of Saflufenacil at four different application methods or timings.

68



Conclusions:

At 6 DA-A there was high phytotoxicity of the crop, at 73% damage. Weeds were all well controlled. At 14 DA-A the phytotoxicity had decreased to 50% in those plots which had treatment A compared to the untreated. Weed control was excellent (93-100 %, depending on species). At 24 DA-A, phytotoxicity had decreased to 28% relative to the untreated.

16 days after treatment B the plants that had the first treatment (A) had recovered and had little phytotoxicity. Weed control had started to lose effectiveness as annuals such as Oxalis, grasses and perennials such as Canada thistle were beginning to show up. In the B treatment plots, phytotoxicity was significant at 44%. Toxicity at this application was the highest and persisted throughout the trial. Control of Canada thistle for the plots which received the B application was better than treatment timing A, 95% to 5%.

Phytotoxicity in the plots which received the C application timing was not different that treatment B, although treatment B showed phytotoxicity at 65% and C showed 37% which was significantly higher than treatment A which had 10% damage.

All treatment timings except timing A had similar phytotoxicy to the crop at 13 DA-D, and at 20 DA-D there were no differences between treatments. This phytotoxicity to the crop did not effect yield significantly.

This trial shows that application timing of Saflufenacil at a 4X field rate has high phytotoxicity at the 1 foot growth stage, in mid- May. However, early PRE treatments or a POST-directed treatment approximately 4 weeks before harvest are tolerated, and control weeds well. Also in this trial, due the very wet and humid conditions in late June and the beginning of July there appeared some mold in the berries at time of harvest.

Contacts Study Director: Rick Edwards Title: Research Associate Organization: Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center Address: 1680 Madison Avenue City+State/Prov: Wooster, Ohio Postal Code: 44691 E-mail: [email protected] Country: USA United States

Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Title: Professor Organization: OARDC/The Ohio State University Address: 1680 Madison Ave. City+State/Prov: Wooster, Ohio Postal Code: 44691

Crop Description Crop 1: RUBID Rubus idaeus Red raspberry Variety: ENCORE BBCH Scale: BPER

Planting Date: May-15-2007 Row Spacing, Unit: 10 FT Spacing Within Row, Unit: 3 FT

69



Pest Description Pest 1 Type: W Code: CERVU Cerastium fontanum vulgare Common Name: Mouse-ear chickweed Pest 2 Type: W Code: AGRRE Elymus repens Common Name: Quackgrass Pest 3 Type: W Code: CIRAR Cirsium arvense Common Name: Canada thistle Site and Design Treated Plot Width: 5 FT Total Plot Width: 5 FT Site Type: ORCHAR orchard Treated Plot Length: 20 FT Total Plot Length: 20 FT Experimental Unit: 1 PLOT plot Treated Plot Area: 100 FT2 Treatments: 5 Replications: 4 Study Design: RACOBL Randomized Complete Block (RCB) Soil Description Description Name: Wooster Silt Loam % Sand: 16 % OM: 2.8 Texture: CSL clay sandy loam % Silt: 72 pH: 6.4 Soil Name: HU2 % Clay: 12 CEC: 5.6 Application Description A B C D Application Date: Apr-24-2015 May-18-2015 Jun-3-2015 Jun-10-2015 Appl. Start Time: 10:00 AM 2:00 PM 1:00 PM 11:00 AM Appl. Stop Time: 10:30 AM 2:30 PM 1:30 PM 11:30 AM Application Method: SPRAY SPRAY SPRAY SPRAY Application Placement: BROADC BANDIR BANDIR BANDIR Applied By: R. Edwards R. Edwards R. Edwards R. Edwards Air Temperature, Unit: 42 F 74 F 64 F 77 F % Relative Humidity: 57 83 78 77 Wind Velocity, Unit: 5.9 MPH 6 MPH 4.6 MPH 6.6 MPH Wind Direction: SW S NE SE Soil Temperature, Unit: 43.5 F 66 F 62 F 67 F Soil Moisture: SLIWET GOOD GOOD NORMAL % Cloud Cover: 0 100 70 20 Crop Stage At Each Application A B C D Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: RUBID BPER RUBID BPER RUBID BPER RUBID BPER Stage Scale Used: BBCH BBCH BBCH BBCH Stage Majority, Percent: 21 90 51 67 70 Height, Unit: 2 IN 1 FT 4 FT 4 FT Pest Stage At Each Application A B C D Pest 1 Code, Type, Scale: CERVU W CERVU W CERVU W CERVU W Height, Unit: 1 IN 3 IN 4 IN 4 IN Pest 2 Code, Type, Scale: AGRRE W AGRRE W AGRRE W AGRRE W Height, Unit: 1 IN 4 IN 6 IN 10 IN Pest 3 Code, Type, Scale: CIRAR W CIRAR W CIRAR W CIRAR W Height, Unit: 1 IN 6 IN 12 IN 18 IN

70


The Ohio State University Application Equipment A B C D Equipment Type: BACCAI BACCAI BACCAI BACCAI Operation Pressure, Unit: 30 PSI Nozzle Type: FLAT FAN Nozzle Size: 8002 8002 8002 8002 Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 18 IN 18 IN 18 IN 18 IN Nozzles/Row: 2 2 2 2 Spray Volume, Unit: 20 GAL/AC 20 GAL/AC 20 GAL/AC 20 GAL/AC Mix Size, Unit: 2 liters 2 liters 2 liters 2 liters Date By Notes Aug-12-2014 Weed control assessments were taken by evaluating the middle of the row, inside the canes, and outside of the row.

71

Dec-21-2015 (P11079 2015) ARM 2014.7 AOV Means Table Page 5

The Ohio State University IR-4 Efficacy of Saflufenacil in Caneberry Trial ID: P11079 (YEAR2) Location: HU2 OARDC Trial Year: 2015 Protocol ID: P11079 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Project ID: Study Director: Richard Edwards Sponsor Contact: Dr. Marija Arsenovic Pest Code CIRAR CARHI CIRAR STEME CARHI Crop Code RUBID RUBID Rating Date Apr-30-2015 Apr-30-2015 Apr-30-2015 May-8-2015 May-8-2015 May-8-2015 May-8-2015 Rating Type PHYGEN CONTRO CONTRO PHYGEN CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO Rating Unit % % % % % % % Trt-Eval Interval 6 DA-A 6 DA-A 6 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A Trt Treatment Rate Appl No. Name Rate Unit Code 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Handweeded Check 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 2 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a A 73 93 63 50 93 93 100 MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal B 3 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 4 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a C MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 5 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a D MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal LSD P=.05 . . . . . . . Standard Deviation . . . . . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F) Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls) t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed. Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL. Untreated treatment(s) 1 excluded from analysis.

72


The Ohio State University Pest Code CIRAR STEME CARHI OXAST CIRAR Crop Code RUBID RUBID Rating Date May-18-2015 May-18-2015 May-18-2015 May-18-2015 May-18-2015 Jun-3-2015 Jun-3-2015 Rating Type PHYGEN CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO PHYGEN CONTRO Rating Unit % % % % % % % Trt-Eval Interval 24 DA-A 24 DA-A 24 DA-A 24 DA-A 24 DA-A 16 DA-B 16 DA-B Trt Treatment Rate Appl No. Name Rate Unit Code 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 Handweeded Check 0 100 100 100 100 0 100 2 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a A 28 80 88 95 75 3 b 5 b MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal B 3 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a 44 a 95 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 4 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a C MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 5 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a D MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal LSD P=.05 . . . . . 13.6 21.5 Standard Deviation . . . . . 6.0 9.6 Replicate F 3.971 0.273 Replicate Prob(F) 0.1436 0.8429 Treatment F 93.343 176.727 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0024 0.0009

73


The Ohio State University Pest Code OXAST TRFRE GLEHE AGRASS CARHI CIRAR OXAST Crop Code RUBID Rating Date Jun-3-2015 Jun-3-2015 Jun-3-2015 Jun-3-2015 Jun-3-2015 Jun-10-2015 Jun-10-2015 Jun-10-2015 Rating Type CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO PHYGEN CONTRO CONTRO Rating Unit % % % % % % % % Trt-Eval Interval 16 DA-B 16 DA-B 16 DA-B 16 DA-B 16 DA-B 7 DA-C 7 DA-C 7 DA-C Trt Treatment Rate Appl No. Name Rate Unit Code 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1 Handweeded Check 100 100 100 100 100 1 100 100 2 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a A 50 a 88 100 1 a 87 a 10 b 28 a 55 b MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal B 3 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a 98 a 100 96 19 a 99 a 65 a 98 a 97 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 4 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a C 37 a 24 a 91 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 5 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a D MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal LSD P=.05 81.5 . . 1.3t 54.8t 0.5t 44.5t 22.0t Standard Deviation 36.2 . . 0.6t 24.4t 0.3t 25.7t 12.7t Replicate F 0.746 2.594 0.374 0.553 2.108 0.942 Replicate Prob(F) 0.5923 0.2272 0.7799 0.6648 0.2006 0.4769 Treatment F 3.438 5.346 0.694 7.938 5.187 7.242 Treatment Prob(F) 0.1608 0.1038 0.4659 0.0206 0.0492 0.0251

74


The Ohio State University Pest Code AGRRE STEME SETFA GLEHE CIRAR AGRRE Crop Code RUBID Rating Date Jun-10-2015 Jun-10-2015 Jun-10-2015 Jun-10-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015 Rating Type CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO PHYGEN CONTRO CONTRO Rating Unit % % % % % % % Trt-Eval Interval 7 DA-C 7 DA-C 7 DA-C 7 DA-C 13 DA-D 13 DA-D 13 DA-D Trt Treatment Rate Appl No. Name Rate Unit Code 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 Handweeded Check 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 2 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a A 18 a 48 a 20 a 99 a 8 b 43 a 0 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal B 3 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a 65 a 85 a 66 a 100 a 50 70 a 28 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 4 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a C 28 a 70 a 29 a 98 a 36 a 65 a 33 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 5 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a D 28 a 53 a 35 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal LSD P=.05 66.2 65.3 70.4 20.7t 15.7 35.8 38.2 Standard Deviation 38.3 37.7 40.7 12.0t 9.1 22.4 23.9 Replicate F 0.926 1.363 0.996 0.810 0.697 0.633 0.073 Replicate Prob(F) 0.4835 0.3408 0.4561 0.5331 0.5868 0.6119 0.9729 Treatment F 1.713 1.000 1.458 0.192 10.513 1.233 1.829 Treatment Prob(F) 0.2578 0.4219 0.3048 0.8301 0.0109 0.3534 0.2120

75


The Ohio State University Pest Code OXAST ASCSY STEME CIRAR AGRRE OXAST Crop Code RUBID Rating Date Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-23-2015 Jun-30-2015 Jun-30-2015 Jun-30-2015 Jun-30-2015 Rating Type CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO PHYGEN CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO Rating Unit % % % % % % % Trt-Eval Interval 13 DA-D 13 DA-D 13 DA-D 20 DA-D 20 DA-D 20 DA-D 20 DA-D Trt Treatment Rate Appl No. Name Rate Unit Code 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 1 Handweeded Check 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 2 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a A 48 a 70 a 100 14 a 33 a 5 a 23 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal B 3 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a 70 a 83 a 75 a 58 80 a 35 a 60 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 4 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a C 78 a 100 a 85 a 33 a 50 a 43 a 40 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 5 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a D 68 a 100 a 100 a 25 a 45 a 38 a 40 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal LSD P=.05 28.0 50.3 33.6 19.2 43.0 46.2 60.6 Standard Deviation 17.5 31.5 19.4 11.1 26.9 28.9 37.9 Replicate F 0.510 0.528 1.000 1.102 0.585 0.180 0.783 Replicate Prob(F) 0.6851 0.6738 0.4547 0.4185 0.6398 0.9073 0.5328 Treatment F 2.143 0.865 1.676 2.898 2.245 1.380 0.655 Treatment Prob(F) 0.1649 0.4938 0.2640 0.1316 0.1523 0.3104 0.5997

76


The Ohio State University Pest Code Crop Code RUBID RUBID RUBID RUBID Rating Date Jun-30-2015 Jul-7-2015 Jul-10-2015 Jul-15-2015 Rating Type HARVRE HARVRE HARVRE HARVTOT Rating Unit g g g g Trt-Eval Interval 20 DA-D 27 DA-D 27 DA-D 27 DA-D Trt Treatment Rate Appl No. Name Rate Unit Code 37 38 39 40 1 Handweeded Check 260 589 119 967 2 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a A 167 a 300 a 63 a 535 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal B 3 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a 166 a 158 a 12 a 378 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 4 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a C 222 a 502 a 38 a 851 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal 5 Saflufenacil 4X 0.178 lb ai/a D 180 a 285 a 45 a 529 a MSO 1 % v/v Ammonium Sulfate 8 lb/100 gal LSD P=.05 187.7 9.2t 5.4t 506.7 Standard Deviation 117.4 5.8t 3.4t 316.8 Replicate F 0.712 1.773 1.253 1.042 Replicate Prob(F) 0.5691 0.2222 0.3471 0.4199 Treatment F 0.203 1.948 1.192 1.575 Treatment Prob(F) 0.8919 0.1924 0.3666 0.2624

77


The Ohio State University IR-4 Efficacy of Saflufenacil in Caneberry Trial ID: P11079 (YEAR2) Location: HU2 OARDC Trial Year: 2015 Protocol ID: P11079 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Project ID: Study Director: Richard Edwards Sponsor Contact: Dr. Marija Arsenovic Pest Code CIRAR, Cirsium arvense, = US CARHI, Cardamine hirsuta, = US STEME, Stellaria media, = US OXAST, Oxalis stricta, = US TRFRE, Trifolium repens, = US GLEHE, Glechoma hederacea, = US AGRRE, , = US SETFA, Setaria faberi, = US AGRRE, Elymus repens, = US ASCSY, Asclepias syriaca, = US Crop Code RUBID, BPER, Rubus idaeus, = US Rating Type PHYGEN = phytotoxicity - general / injury CONTRO = control / burndown or knockdown HARVRE = harvest ready Rating Unit % = percent g = gram

78

(PRYX.SWCOR.15.JPR.01) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 1


2015 ANTHEM/ATZ IN 5 SWEET CORN AND 3 POPCORN VARIETIES

Trial ID: PRYX.SWCOR.15.JPR.01 Location: WOOSTER, OH Trial Year: 2015Protocol ID: PRYX.SWCOR.15.JPR.01 Investigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan

Project ID: Study Director: Rick Edwards Sponsor Contact:

General Trial InformationStudy Director: Richard Edwards Title: Research AssociateInvestigator: Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Title: Professor


Initiation Date: Jun-9-2015 Planned Completion Date: Oct-30-2015Completion Date: Oct-30-2015




Objectives:

Evaluate the level of crop safety of Anthem ATZ herbicide applied to soil pre-emergence in 5 varieties of sweet corn and 3 varieties of popcorn.

Conclusions:

Plots were randomly assigned by variety as a complete block design. Each odd numbered plot received Anthem ATZ while each even numbered plot received Bicep II Magnum. Each plot was 10 feet wide X 25 feet long. There were 4 rows of corn in each plot at 30 inch spacing. The middle two rows were used for all assessments.The corn was planted on June 9, 2015. The herbicides were applied on June 22, 2015. The corn was just emerged at about the V1 stage.Phytotoxicity to Robust White was greatest at 9 days after application of Anthem ATZ (13%) and that variety with Bicep II was the smallest on July 21. The variety that was the tallest on July 21, was NK-199. There were no differences in yeild of marketable ears or percent of marketable ears per 20 feet of row. It is noted that Temptation showed no damage and was one of the tallest varieties. However on August 25th, when this variety was harvested, over 1/2 of the total plots in the trial were found to have been damaged with animal feeding. No other plot in the trial exhibited animal feeding.

ContactsStudy Director: Richard Edwards Title: Research AssociateOrganization: The Ohio State University, OARDC






Crop DescriptionCrop 1: ZEAMS Zea mays saccharata Sweet corn

BBCH Scale: BCOR Planting Date: Jun-9-2015

Planting Method: DRILLE drilled

79



Site and DesignTreated Plot Width: 10 FTTreated Plot Length: 30 FTTreated Plot Area: 300 FT2 Treatments: 16



A


Appl. Start Time: 12:00 PM








Wind Direction: SW


Soil Moisture: SLIDRY


A

Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: ZEAMS BCOR

Stage Scale Used: DESC


A



Nozzle Size: 8003

Nozzles/Row: 4

80






Additional Information (Validation List Comments)H, herbicide = herbicide|F, one-year/final = one-year/final|6GOOD = Good qualityOhio, OH = USAN = N=noZEAMS, BCOR, Zea mays saccharata, = USDRILLE, drilled = drilledFT = footSPLPLO, Split-Plot = Split-PlotSPRAY = sprayJULY = month: July (herb. only)BROADC = broadcastF = FahrenheitMPH = mile per hourSW = South WestSLIDRY = slightly dry|ADESC = descriptive growth stagesSPRAYE = sprayer

81

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Student-Newman-Keuls)t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=11,12,14Excluded replicate 3 in column 5; 4 in 10

(PRYX.SWCOR.15.JPR.01) ARM 2014.8 AOV Means Table Page 4





Crop Code ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMSRating Date Jul-1-2015 Jul-15-2015 Jul-21-2015 Jul-21-2015 Jul-21-2015 Jul-21-2015 Jul-21-2015 Jul-21-2015 Jul-21-2015

Rating Type DAMAGE VIGRED STAOBJ HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHT HEIGHTRating Unit % % NUMBER cm cm cm cm cm cmNumber of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Crop Stage Majority 34 34 34 34 34 34Trt-Eval Interval 9 DA-A 21 DA-A 29 DA-A 29 DA-A 29 DA-A 29 DA-A 29 DA-A 29 DA-A 29 DA-ANumber of Decimals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

1 MUNITION A 0 c 0 a 39 abc 127 bc 117 abc 126 cd 121 a-d 119 ab 121 bcdANTHEM 8 oz/a

2 MUNITION A 0 c 1 a 37 a-d 118 bc 122 abc 111 cde 123 a-d 111 ab 109 cdBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

3 TEMPTATION 0 c 0 a 35 a-d 122 bc 125 abc 123 cd 121 a-d 116 ab 128 abcANTHEM 8 oz/a

4 TEMPTATION 3 bc 3 a 34 a-d 119 bc 134 ab 123 cd 127 a-d 130 a 132 abcBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

5 7143 4 abc 1 a 30 d 104 cd 102 bc 114 cde 109 bcd 113 ab 113 bcdANTHEM 8 oz/a

6 7143 3 bc 1 a 32 bcd 118 bc 116 abc 114 cde 107 cd 111 ab 113 bcdBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

7 IOCHIEF 9 abc 0 a 31 cd 121 bc 126 abc 120 cd 124 a-d 125 ab 119 bcdANTHEM 8 oz/a

8 IOCHIEF 8 abc 2 a 31 bcd 127 bc 115 abc 122 cd 117 a-d 116 ab 118 bcdBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

9 NK-199 3 bc 0 a 37 a-d 148 a 143 a 150 a 139 ab 139 a 142 abANTHEM 8 oz/a

10 NK-199 8 abc 5 a 38 abc 142 ab 135 ab 144 ab 146 a 141 a 150 aBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

11 ROBUST YELLOW 10 ab 0 a 40 a 101 cd 121 abc 113 cde 117 a-d 109 ab 110 cdANTHEM 8 oz/a

12 ROBUST YELLOW 11 ab 1 a 42 a 119 bc 111 abc 120 cd 105 cd 106 ab 111 cdBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

13 ROBUST WHITE 13 a 1 a 39 ab 103 cd 115 abc 104 de 113 bcd 108 ab 110 cdANTHEM 8 oz/a

14 ROBUST WHITE 11 ab 2 a 38 abc 91 d 96 c 94 e 97 d 93 b 94 dBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

15 PURDUE 410 6 abc 0 a 35 a-d 124 bc 120 abc 130 bc 132 abc 126 ab 129 abcANTHEM 8 oz/a

16 PURDUE 410 9 abc 2 a 35 a-d 117 bc 117 abc 119 cd 120 a-d 120 ab 119 bcdBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

LSD P=.05 5.7 0.6t 4.7 15.1 20.4 14.2 18.7 0.1t 18.2Standard Deviation 4.0 0.4t 3.3 10.6 12.2 9.9 13.1 0.1t 12.7

82



ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMS ZEAMSJul-21-2015 Aug-25-2015 Aug-25-2015

average EARSMKT EARSUNMKT TOTAL % MRKTcm NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER %

1 1 1 1 1

29 DA-A 64 DA-A 64 DA-A1 0 0 0 2

10 11 12 13 14

116.6 abc 21 a 11 a 32 ab 0.64 a

114.5 abc 18 a 10 a 28 ab 0.65 a

122.2 ab 21 a 12 a 17 ab 0.62 a

124.1 ab 23 a 8 a 16 b 0.74 a

111.4 bc 21 a 14 a 35 a 0.59 a

113.6 abc 17 a 13 a 31 ab 0.55 a

119.0 abc 13 a 8 a 22 ab 0.60

122.4 ab 12 a 6 a 18 ab 0.64 a

139.9 a 20 a 7 a 28 ab 0.73 a

139.7 a 16 a 10 a 26 ab 0.60 a

108.7 bc 18 a 6 a 24 ab 0.76 a

110.6 bc 15 a 9 a 24 ab 0.62 a

105.4 bc 17 a 9 a 26 ab 0.65 a

94.1 c 15 a 9 a 24 ab 0.60 a

128.6 ab 15 a 7 a 22 ab 0.68 a

117.4 abc 13 a 9 a 22 ab 0.60 a

15.55 6.4 0.2t 10.6 0.1769.33 4.5 0.1t 7.4 0.123

Crop CodeRating DateRating TypeRating UnitNumber of SubsamplesCrop Stage MajorityTrt-Eval IntervalNumber of Decimals


1 MUNITION AANTHEM 8 oz/a

2 MUNITION ABICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

3 TEMPTATIONANTHEM 8 oz/a

4 TEMPTATIONBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

5 7143ANTHEM 8 oz/a

6 7143BICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

7 IOCHIEFANTHEM 8 oz/a

8 IOCHIEFBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

9 NK-199ANTHEM 8 oz/a

10 NK-199BICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

11 ROBUST YELLOWANTHEM 8 oz/a

12 ROBUST YELLOWBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

13 ROBUST WHITEANTHEM 8 oz/a

14 ROBUST WHITEBICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A

15 PURDUE 410ANTHEM 8 oz/a

16 PURDUE 410BICEP II MAGNUM 2.1 qt/a A


83






Crop Code ZEAMS, BCOR, Zea mays saccharata, = USRating Type DAMAGE = damage VIGRED = vigor reduction STAOBJ = stand - objective (based on counts) HEIGHT = heightRating Unit % = percent NUMBER = number cm = centimeterCrop Stage Majority 34 = 4 nodes detectableARM Action Codes T1 = @AVG([C4].[C9])

84

Feb-23-2017 (AUTHORITY Fall Spring Tomato 2015) ARM 2014.8 Site Description Page 1 of 3


AUTHORITY MTZ 2014/2015 TOMATOES/FALL-SPRING PROGRAMS/OH/IN

Trial ID:FMC 2015 AUTHORITY FALL SPRING Location:WOOSTER, OH Trial Year:2015Protocol ID:SULF.TOM.14.JPR Investigator:Dr. Douglas J. Doohan

Project ID: Study Director: Sponsor Contact:

General Trial InformationStudy Director:Rick Edwards Title:Research Associate

Investigator:Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Title:Professor

Discipline:H herbicideTrial Status:F one-year/final

Initiation Date:Dec-4-2014Completion Date:Nov-11-2015

Trial LocationCity:Wooster Country:USAUnited States

State/Prov.:OhioPostal Code:44691 Climate Zone:EPPONE EPPO North East

Conducted Under GLP:NoConducted Under GEP:No

Objectives:OBJECTIVES: To observe the weed control and crop response of Authority MTZ applied in the fall, to the soil, and in the spring, pre-transplant.

TIMING: A = FALLB = SPRING = PRE-TRANSPLANTC = POSTRPLNT = POST TRANSPLANT

TARGETS: Winter annual broadleaves and greasses.

Conclusions:

There were no differences in weed control for any treatment in this trial. All treatments performed well in controlling weeds throughout the trial, including assessments made at 6 weeks post-transplant. There were no differences in crop damage between treatments. However, means for phytotoxicity were greater (but not significantly) for the 8oz/A fall followed by 12 oz/A spring treatment (treatment 8) than for treatments which included 10 oz/A, 12 oz/A and 14 oz/A in the fall with no spring application at 14, 22 and 37 days after planting. Marketable fruit weight was increased for the 8 oz/A fall followed by 12 oz/A spring treatment, as well as the 10 oz/A fall followed by 6 oz/A spring, compared to other treatments.Therefore the treatment of Authority in the fall, at 8, 10 or 12 oz/A followed by a second treatment at 8 days before transplant did not damage the crop significantly, and in some cases improved marketable yield. There were no differences in the weed control in any treatment.

ContactsStudy Director:Rick Edwards Title:Research Associate

Organization:Ohio Agricultural Research and Development CenterAddress:1680 Madison Avenue

City+State/Prov:Wooster, OhioPostal Code:44691 E-mail:[email protected]

Country:USA United States

Investigator:Dr. Douglas J. Doohan Title:ProfessorOrganization:Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center

Address:1680 Madison AvenueCity+State/Prov:Wooster, Ohio

Postal Code:44691Country:USA United States

85






Crop DescriptionCrop 1:LYPXPLycopersicon es., transplanted Transplanted tomatoVariety:PETO 696 BBCH Scale:BVSO

Planting Date:May-26-2015 Planting Method:TRANSPtransplanted

Planting Equipment:FPP Finger Pickup Planter

Site and DesignTreated Plot Width:10FT Site Type:FIELD field

Treated Plot Length:20FTTreated Plot Area:200 FT2 Treatments:14

Replications:4 Study Design:RACOBLRandomized Complete Block (RCB)


A B C

Application Date: Dec-4-2014 May-18-2015 Jul-7-2015

Appl. Start Time: 1100 1100

Appl. Stop Time: 12:45 PM 12:00 PM

Application Method: SPRAY SPRAY SPRAY

Application Timing: DORMAN PRETRA

Application Placement: BROADC BROADC BROADC

Air Temperature, Unit: 30.5 F 61 F

% Relative Humidity: 89 68

Wind Velocity, Unit: 0 MPH 8.5 MPH

Dew Presence (Y/N): Y yes N no

Soil Temperature, Unit: 35.6 F 65 F

Soil Moisture: SLIWET SLIDRY

% Cloud Cover: 50 10


A B C

Crop 1 Code, BBCH Scale: LYPXP BVSO LYPXP BVSO LYPXP BVSO

86







A B C

Equipment Type: BACCAI BACCAI BACCAI

Operation Pressure, Unit: 40 PSI 40 PSI 40 PSI

Nozzle Type: XR Teejet XR Teejet XR Teejet

Nozzle Size: 8002 8002 8002

Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 18 IN 18 IN 18 IN

Nozzles/Row: 4 4 4

Nozzle Calibration, Unit: 24 OZ/MIN 24 OZ/MIN

Band Width, Unit: 6 FT 6 FT 6 FT

% Coverage: 100.0 100.0 100.0

Spray Volume, Unit: 20 gal/ac 20 GAL/AC


87

Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD)Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.Missing data estimates are included in columns:Average=9

Feb-23-2017 (AUTHORITY Fall Spring Tomato 2015) ARM 2014.8 AOV Means Table Page 1 of 22





Pest Type W Weed W Weed W Weed W Weed W WeedPest Code CIRAR TRFRE CHEAL AMARE AGRREPest Scientific Name Cirsium arvense Trifolium repe> Chenopodium al> Amaranthus ret> Elymus repens

Pest Name Canada thistle White clover Common lambsqu> Redroot pigweed Quackgrass

Crop CodeBBCH ScaleCrop Scientific Name

Crop NamePart RatedRating Date May-12-2015 May-12-2015 May-12-2015 May-12-2015 May-12-2015

Rating Type COUNT COUNT COUNT COUNT COUNTRating Unit m2 m2 m2 m2 m2Number of Subsamples 1 1 1 1 1Pest Stage Majority .5 IN .5 IN .5 IN .5 IN .5 INDays After First/Last Applic. 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159Trt-Eval Interval 159 DA-A 159 DA-A 159 DA-A 159 DA-A 159 DA-APlant-Eval Interval -14 DP-1 -14 DP-1 -14 DP-1 -14 DP-1 -14 DP-1

Trt Treatment Rate ApplNo. Name Rate Unit Code 1 2 3 4 5

1 UNTREATED 8.8 a 6.3 a 5.3 a 3.0 a 5.0 a

2 AUTHORITY MTZ 10 oz/a A 1.0 b 1.5 b 0.3 b 0.0 b 0.0 aROUNDUP POWERMAX 32 oz/a AAIM 1 oz/a A2,4-D ESTER 16 oz/a ACOC 1 % v/v ASENCOR DF 2 oz/a CMATRIX 1 oz/a C

3 AUTHORITY MTZ 10 oz/a A 0.3 b 0.8 b 0.0 b 0.3 b 0.5 aROUNDUP POWERMAX 32 oz/a AAIM 1 oz/a A2,4-D ESTER 16 oz/a ACOC 1 % v/v ASENCOR DF 2 oz/a CDUAL MAGNUM 16 oz/a C




88







8 AUTHORITY MTZ 8 oz/a A 1.3 b 1.3 b 0.3 b 0.3 b 0.0 aROUNDUP POWERMAX 32 oz/a AAIM 1 oz/a ACOC 1 % v/v AAUTHORITY MTZ 12 oz/a BROUNDUP POWERMAX 32 oz/a BSENCOR DF 2 oz/a CMATRIX 1 oz/a C










89









LSD P=.05 2.64 2.14 2.53 1.03 4.73Standard Deviation 1.85 1.49 1.77 0.72 3.31CV 164.01 92.97 353.84 251.53 386.23Bartlett's X2 33.731 24.641 37.274 16.719 61.27P(Bartlett's X2) 0.001* 0.026* 0.001* 0.002* 0.001*Skewness 3.9271* 1.6913* 5.1908* 4.5322* 4.9394*Kurtosis 18.1673* 3.314* 28.3075* 22.117* 24.7967*

Replicate F 0.733 1.632 1.111 1.844 0.899Replicate Prob(F) 0.5388 0.1977 0.3565 0.1552 0.4502Treatment F 5.872 3.837 2.445 4.830 1.136Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0005 0.0156 0.0001 0.3604







90






W Weed W Weed W Weed W WeedGLEHE STEME CAPBP CIRAR

Glechoma heder> Stellaria media Capsella bursa> Cirsium arvense

Ground ivy Common chickwe> Shepherd's pur> Canada thistle

LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato

May-12-2015 May-12-2015 Jun-2-2015 Jun-2-2015 Jun-2-2015

COUNT COUNT DAMAGE CONTRO CONTROm2 m2 % % %

1 1 1 1 1.5 IN .5 IN

159 159 159 159 180 15 180 15 180 15159 DA-A 159 DA-A 15 DA-B 15 DA-B 15 DA-B-14 DP-1 -14 DP-1 7 DP-1 7 DP-1 7 DP-1

6 7 8 9 10

3.3 a 12.3 a 0.0 a 0.0 c 0.0 c

0.0 b 0.8 b 6.3 a 91.3 b 96.3 a

0.0 b 0.0 b 2.5 a 98.8 a 98.8 a

0.3 b 0.0 b 2.5 a 91.7 b 88.8 b

0.0 b 0.0 b 2.5 a 100.0 a 98.8 a

0.0 b 0.0 b 5.0 a 97.5 ab 96.3 a

Pest TypePest CodePest Scientific Name

Pest Name


Crop NamePart RatedRating Date

Rating TypeRating UnitNumber of SubsamplesPest Stage MajorityDays After First/Last Applic.Trt-Eval IntervalPlant-Eval Interval


1 UNTREATED

2 AUTHORITY MTZ 10 oz/a AROUNDUP POWERMAX 32 oz/a AAIM 1 oz/a A2,4-D ESTER 16 oz/a ACOC 1 % v/v ASENCOR DF 2 oz/a CMATRIX 1 oz/a C

3 AUTHORITY MTZ 10 oz/a AROUNDUP POWERMAX 32 oz/a AAIM 1 oz/a A2,4-D ESTER 16 oz/a ACOC 1 % v/v ASENCOR DF 2 oz/a CDUAL MAGNUM 16 oz/a C




91






0.0 b 2.3 b 6.3 a 100.0 a 97.5 a

0.0 b 0.3 b 21.3 a 100.0 a 97.5 a

0.0 b 0.0 b 6.3 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

0.0 b 0.3 b 6.3 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

0.0 b 0.0 b 8.8 a 100.0 a 100.0 a




LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato



1 1 1 1 1.5 IN .5 IN


6 7 8 9 10


8 AUTHORITY MTZ 8 oz/a AROUNDUP POWERMAX 32 oz/a AAIM 1 oz/a ACOC 1 % v/v AAUTHORITY MTZ 12 oz/a BROUNDUP POWERMAX 32 oz/a BSENCOR DF 2 oz/a CMATRIX 1 oz/a C





Pest Name





92






0.0 b 0.0 b 2.5 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

0.0 b 0.0 b 3.8 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

0.0 b 0.0 b 2.5 a 100.0 a 97.5 a

1.24 4.96 10.40 6.62 5.490.87 3.47 7.28 4.63 3.84

347.47 308.81 133.62 5.07 4.237.043 35.806 30.89 7.887 5.992

0.008* 0.001* 0.002* 0.048* 0.5416.1877* 4.58* 2.9677* -3.1977* -3.258*

41.5939* 20.9615* 10.8401* 8.8854* 9.3033*

0.915 0.747 0.885 1.766 1.0000.4426 0.5306 0.4573 0.1701 0.4031

3.976 3.521 1.972 130.632 187.8160.0004 0.0011 0.0511 0.0001 0.0001




LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato



1 1 1 1 1.5 IN .5 IN


6 7 8 9 10




LSD P=.05Standard DeviationCVBartlett's X2P(Bartlett's X2)SkewnessKurtosis



Pest Name





93






W Weed W Weed W WeedAMARE AGRASS CONAR POLSS

Amaranthus ret> Annual grasses Convolvulus ar> Polygonum sp.

Redroot pigweed Field bindweed Knotweed

LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato

Jun-2-2015 Jun-2-2015 Jun-9-2015 Jun-9-2015 Jun-9-2015

CONTRO CONTRO DAMAGE CONTRO CONTRO% % % % %1 1 1 1 1

180 15 180 15 187 22 187 22 187 2215 DA-B 15 DA-B 22 DA-B 22 DA-B 22 DA-B

7 DP-1 7 DP-1 14 DP-1 14 DP-1 14 DP-1

11 12 13 14 15

0.0 c 0.0 d 0.0 c 0.0 c 0.0 c

98.8 a 92.5 bc 7.5 bc 100.0 a 95.0 a

100.0 a 96.3 ab 3.8 bc 100.0 a 92.5 a

95.0 a 86.3 c 12.5 bc 100.0 a 100.0 a

98.8 a 95.0 ab 5.0 bc 95.0 b 82.5 b

98.8 a 92.5 bc 5.0 bc 95.0 b 97.5 a


Pest Name





1 UNTREATED






94






75.0 b 96.3 ab 3.8 bc 100.0 a 100.0 a

97.5 a 100.0 a 45.0 a 100.0 a 98.8 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 12.5 bc 100.0 a 100.0 a

100.0 a 98.8 ab 12.5 bc 100.0 a 100.0 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 16.3 bc 100.0 a 100.0 a




LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato




7 DP-1 7 DP-1 14 DP-1 14 DP-1 14 DP-1

11 12 13 14 15







Pest Name





95






100.0 a 100.0 a 8.8 bc 100.0 a 100.0 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 18.8 b 100.0 a 100.0 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 5.0 bc 100.0 a 100.0 a

19.30 6.51 17.42 4.32 8.0113.50 4.55 12.19 3.03 5.6014.96 5.07 109.2 3.28 6.2

45.767 12.186 26.457 0.853 11.3420.001* 0.058 0.009* 0.356 0.023*

-2.9175* -3.1546* 2.1994* -3.3385* -3.0881*6.8437* 8.8062* 5.3266* 9.6591* 8.3661*

1.223 1.865 0.452 1.560 1.2650.3142 0.1514 0.7174 0.2145 0.299615.751 132.113 3.318 308.640 89.3470.0001 0.0001 0.0018 0.0001 0.0001




LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato




7 DP-1 7 DP-1 14 DP-1 14 DP-1 14 DP-1

11 12 13 14 15







Pest Name





96






W Weed W Weed W Weed W WeedCAPBP STEME AGRRE CIRAR

Capsella bursa> Stellaria media Elymus repens Cirsium arvense

Shepherd's pur> Common chickwe> Quackgrass Canada thistle

LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato


CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO DAMAGE% % % % %1 1 1 1 1

187 22 187 22 187 22 187 22 195 3022 DA-B 22 DA-B 22 DA-B 22 DA-B 30 DA-B14 DP-1 14 DP-1 14 DP-1 14 DP-1 22 DP-1

16 17 18 19 20

0.0 b 0.0 c 0.0 c 0.0 b 0.0 c

97.5 a 95.0 ab 95.0 ab 100.0 a 3.8 bc

100.0 a 97.5 a 95.0 ab 95.0 a 2.5 bc

90.0 a 90.0 b 92.5 b 97.5 a 15.0 bc

97.5 a 100.0 a 97.5 ab 100.0 a 1.3 bc

90.0 a 100.0 a 92.5 b 100.0 a 15.0 bc


Pest Name





1 UNTREATED






97






95.0 a 97.5 a 97.5 ab 100.0 a 5.0 bc

100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 97.5 a 42.5 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 22.5 ab

100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 16.3 bc

100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 98.8 a 20.0 bc




LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato




16 17 18 19 20







Pest Name





98






100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 12.5 bc

100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 16.3 bc

100.0 a 100.0 a 95.0 ab 97.5 a 2.5 bc

11.94 6.50 6.27 5.13 22.478.35 4.55 4.39 3.59 15.729.21 4.98 4.85 3.91 125.77

9.274 5.24 2.984 5.369 33.0240.055 0.155 0.811 0.251 0.001*

-3.0065* -3.2452* -3.2052* -3.3229* 1.7651*7.8559* 9.1821* 9.0605* 9.5901* 2.3748*

0.614 0.690 4.333 1.050 2.9810.6099 0.5635 0.0099 0.3815 0.043039.819 135.425 142.371 217.547 2.1320.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0342




LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato




16 17 18 19 20







Pest Name





99






W Weed W Weed W Weed W Weed W WeedAMARE CAPBP POLPY AGRASS POLAV TRFRE

Amaranthus ret> Capsella bursa> Persicaria pen> Polygonum avic> Trifolium repe>

Redroot pigweed Shepherd's pur> Pennsylvania s> Prostrate knot> White clover

Jun-17-2015 Jun-17-2015 Jun-17-2015 Jun-17-2015 Jun-17-2015 Jun-17-2015

CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO% % % % % %1 1 1 1 1 1

195 30 195 30 195 30 195 30 195 30 195 3030 DA-B 30 DA-B 30 DA-B 30 DA-B 30 DA-B 30 DA-B22 DP-1 22 DP-1 22 DP-1 22 DP-1 22 DP-1 22 DP-1

21 22 23 24 25 26

0.0 c 25.0 b 25.0 c 25.0 b 25.0 b 25.0 b

95.0 ab 97.5 a 75.0 b 90.0 a 100.0 a 97.5 a

95.0 ab 100.0 a 96.3 ab 82.5 a 100.0 a 92.5 a

85.0 b 97.5 a 95.0 ab 75.0 a 97.5 a 97.5 a

97.5 a 100.0 a 80.0 ab 87.5 a 100.0 a 95.0 a

90.0 ab 87.5 a 97.5 ab 97.5 a 80.0 a 96.3 a


Pest Name





1 UNTREATED






100






92.5 ab 100.0 a 100.0 a 77.5 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

100.0 a 92.5 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 92.5 a 100.0 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a







21 22 23 24 25 26







Pest Name





101






98.8 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 98.8 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 98.8 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

98.8 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 95.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

11.50 21.97 24.46 25.49 24.75 19.708.05 15.37 17.11 17.83 17.32 13.788.99 16.55 18.88 20.34 18.72 14.8

21.026 18.769 18.664 41.45 12.031 29.8430.004* 0.001* 0.002* 0.001* 0.007* 0.001*

-2.9064* -3.531* -2.9545* -2.5778* -3.3315* -3.8581*7.4441* 11.5501* 7.835* 6.3139* 9.7803* 13.905*

2.896 1.391 1.961 1.503 1.500 1.3740.0472 0.2600 0.1358 0.2289 0.2297 0.264842.233 6.688 5.742 5.058 5.436 8.2120.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001







21 22 23 24 25 26







Pest Name





102






W Weed W Weed W Weed W WeedTAROF AMARE POLPY AGRRE

Taraxacum offi> Amaranthus ret> Persicaria pen> Elymus repens

Common dandeli> Redroot pigweed Pennsylvania s> Quackgrass

LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato

Jun-17-2015 Jul-2-2015 Jul-2-2015 Jul-2-2015 Jul-2-2015CONTRO DAMAGE CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO

% % % % %1 1 1 1 1


27 28 29 30 31

45.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 c 0.0 b 0.0 c

87.5 a 7.5 a 97.5 ab 92.5 a 92.5 ab

80.0 a 3.8 a 95.0 ab 100.0 a 96.3 a

87.5 a 20.0 a 93.8 ab 95.0 a 95.0 ab

85.0 a 1.3 a 97.5 ab 100.0 a 96.3 a

72.5 a 20.0 a 92.5 ab 90.0 a 97.5 a


Pest Name


Crop NamePart RatedRating DateRating TypeRating UnitNumber of SubsamplesPest Stage MajorityDays After First/Last Applic.Trt-Eval IntervalPlant-Eval Interval


1 UNTREATED






103






92.5 a 10.0 a 90.0 ab 100.0 a 86.3 ab

77.5 a 50.0 a 90.0 ab 95.0 a 100.0 a

92.5 a 22.5 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

93.8 a 15.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 100.0 a

96.3 a 25.0 a 77.5 b 100.0 a 77.5 b




LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato


% % % % %1 1 1 1 1


27 28 29 30 31







Pest Name




104






95.0 a 13.8 a 97.5 ab 100.0 a 92.5 ab

75.0 a 17.5 a 100.0 a 100.0 a 93.8 ab

96.3 a 5.0 a 97.5 ab 100.0 a 97.5 a

31.19 27.40 21.78 10.37 18.6121.82 19.18 15.24 7.26 13.0225.97 127.08 17.37 7.99 14.88

41.917 24.968 32.654 2.597 30.4850.001* 0.015* 0.001* 0.458 0.001*

-2.529* 1.6118* -2.5741* -3.0852* -2.6332*6.9305* 1.8519* 5.3886* 8.3259* 5.7359*

1.388 3.164 0.514 0.124 3.4110.2607 0.0351 0.6748 0.9452 0.0267

1.601 1.808 11.598 52.809 15.8290.1267 0.0767 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001




LYPESBVSO

Solanum lycope>

Tomato


% % % % %1 1 1 1 1


27 28 29 30 31







Pest Name




105






W Weed W Weed W WeedPOLAV TRFRE TAROF

Polygonum avic> Trifolium repe> Taraxacum offi>

Prostrate knot> White clover Common dandeli>LYPES LYPESBVSO BVSO

Solanum lycope> Solanum lycope>

Tomato TomatoFRUMAR - FRUUNM -

Jul-2-2015 Jul-2-2015 Jul-2-2015 Sep-21-2015 Sep-21-2015CONTRO CONTRO CONTRO WEIGHT WEIGHT

% % % LB LB1 1 1 1 1


32 33 34 35 36

0.0 b 0.0 c 0.0 c 49.2 bcd 4.1 a

100.0 a 97.5 ab 81.3 ab 32.9 e 12.4 a

100.0 a 95.0 b 83.8 ab 42.9 cd 5.8 a

100.0 a 97.5 ab 91.3 ab 29.8 e 4.8 a

100.0 a 95.0 b 91.3 ab 32.8 e 7.8 a

100.0 a 97.5 ab 77.5 b 53.4 b 4.4 a


Pest NameCrop CodeBBCH ScaleCrop Scientific Name



1 UNTREATED






106






100.0 a 100.0 a 82.5 ab 30.4 e 10.1 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 91.3 ab 73.7 a 11.8 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 93.8 ab 51.6 bc 8.5 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 97.5 a 55.6 b 13.1 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 95.0 a 67.8 a 10.0 a







% % % LB LB1 1 1 1 1


32 33 34 35 36










107






97.5 a 100.0 a 92.5 ab 42.2 d 9.2 a

97.5 a 100.0 a 97.5 a 44.1 cd 10.2 a

100.0 a 100.0 a 95.0 a 47.1 bcd 9.9 a

2.59 4.36 17.39 8.86 6.871.82 3.05 12.17 6.20 4.811.96 3.33 14.56 13.28 55.09

0.0 0.146 20.03 16.025 38.794. 0.997 0.067 0.248 0.001*

-3.3914* -3.3272* -2.3432* 0.6259 0.9994*9.9222* 9.6299* 4.975* 0.2276 1.3759*

2.167 2.241 2.274 1.834 1.0730.1074 0.0987 0.0951 0.1570 0.3718

861.000 300.665 16.695 18.481 1.5180.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.1546







% % % LB LB1 1 1 1 1


32 33 34 35 36










108






Pest Type W, Weed, G-BYRW7, G-WedStg = Weed or volunteer cropPest Code CIRAR, Cirsium arvense, = US TRFRE, Trifolium repens, = US CHEAL, Chenopodium album, = US AMARE, Amaranthus retroflexus, = US AGRRE, Elymus repens, = US GLEHE, Glechoma hederacea, = US STEME, Stellaria media, = US CAPBP, Capsella bursa-pastoris, = US CONAR, Convolvulus arvensis, = US POLSS, Polygonum sp., = US POLPY, Persicaria pensylvanica, = US POLAV, Polygonum aviculare, = US TAROF, Taraxacum officinale, = USCrop Code LYPES, BVSO, Solanum lycopersicum, = USPart Rated FRUMAR = fruit - marketable FRUUNM = fruit - unmarketableRating Type COUNT = count DAMAGE = damage CONTRO = control / burndown or knockdown WEIGHT = weightRating Unit m2 = square meter % = percent LB = poundPlant-Eval Interval -14 DP-1 = 1 LYPXP May-26-2015 7 DP-1 = 1 LYPXP May-26-2015 14 DP-1 = 1 LYPXP May-26-2015 22 DP-1 = 1 LYPXP May-26-2015 37 DP-1 = 1 LYPXP May-26-2015 118 DP-1 = 1 LYPXP May-26-2015

109

weed management in horticultural crops - owl...for onion trailbazer, no damage was found 20 da-pre...

Documents