Ouse Washes Landscape Partnership scheme: Scheme-wide Outcomes and how project outcomes feed into these

Programme Desired Scheme-wide Outcome Aggregation of Outcomes from ProjectsA (Conservation) Better condition of natural heritage achieved 1, 3, 12

Better condition of built heritage achieved 4, 5Heritage better identified and recorded 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 15, 16, 17, 25Improved management and maintenance of heritage 2, 3, 4, 25

B (Participation) Increased community participation in local heritage [e.g. through activities/visits/events]

4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 23

Greater diversity of people engaging with local heritage 1, 4, 8, 10Increased community participation in local heritage through volunteering

5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 14, 16, 18, 23, 25

People having developed an increasing interest in the heritage of the area

1, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 16, 19, 24

C (Access & Learning) Expanded information about the area’s heritage and information made more accessible through an expanded range of information sources

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 25

Increased knowledge about the local landscape and heritage with locals and visitors

1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25

Improved public access to the local landscape and heritage 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 17, 18, 19Increased diversity of people accessing local landscape and heritage 1, 4, 6, 8, 14, 15, 17, 19Increased recognition and appreciation of the heritage and landscape/ People having a more positive attitude towards local landscape and heritage

1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25

Raised greater awareness of the threats to the landscape and its communities and the positive contributions people could make [e.g. increased knowledge of good farming practice and how this contributes to environmental quality; improved understanding and exploration of the archaeology and history of the area; and increased understanding of the importance of the wetland habitat creation schemes]

2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 20, 21, 25

Opened up new dialogues that inform debates about changing and adapting management processes in the future

1, 4, 9, 11, 12, 20, 21

Programme Desired Scheme-wide Outcome Aggregation of Outcomes from ProjectsD (Training) Improved heritage skills of local people, especially those who are

unemployed or with low educational attainment3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25

More local people trained to continue to maintain, manage and promote the area's inherent beauty, natural and built heritage assets

2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 16, 22, 23, 24

Increased capacity of partners to offer training opportunities to people 23Increase in the number and types of new volunteering opportunities created

3, 5, 8, 10, 18, 23

General Increased cooperation between existing partners [leading to more strategic partnership working, a clear future vision and long-term commitment from a wide group of partners]

2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 12. 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24

The OWLP landscape area recognised and promoted as a distinctive visitor and local destination

1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 16, 20, 24

Strengthened and promoted major and minor ‘access hubs’ along the OWLP area

6, 11, 12, 18, 19, 20

Greater engagement with local heritage by schools, colleges and adult education providers

4, 13, 15, 17, 18, 22

An improved sense of identity and stronger community cohesion 1, 4, 8, 11, 15, 16, 19, 20Enhanced the quality of life and well-being of communities 5, 18, 22Increased community empowerment to manage local heritage in future 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 12, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25Increase in the number of people working or earning a living from the local heritageIncreased spending in the local area linked to heritage 11, 12, 19, 24