criminalbydesign.files.wordpress.com€¦ · web viewontario superior court of justice (central...

-1-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(Central West Region)

WAYNE FERRON -versus-

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADAMADAM PAULETTE MELANSON(INQ-002353)

MR. PAUL RICHARD(file# 7100-010299)EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE

MADAM J. SANTINOTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO

MR. PETER WESTGATE(Newmarket Courthouse, Crown Attorney)MR. PAUL TAIT(Assistant, Crown Attorney)

MR. JEFFREY COSTAIN(Assistant Crown Attorney) MS. JOANNE STEWART(Assistant Crown Attorney) MR. MATTHEW ASMA(Assistant Crown Attorney)

YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICESPEEL REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES

MR. H. M. Metcalf(Chief of Police)MR. PERKINS(Police Officer 2261)

WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEMDOCTOR JEFFRY HANDLER

DOCTOR KOCZERGINSKIDOCTOR R. HOOD

DOCTOR ACHARYYADOCTOR OHENE-DAR KOH

← MRS HAMILTON(Nurse in charge)THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL

ONTARIO-WORKSMS. NICOLE ARBOUR

MS. CINDY KREIGER(Caseworker #353)SALVATION ARMYMR. HARRY BOOM

______________________________________________

AFFIDAVIT of APPLICANT (Wayne FERRON)______________________________________________

AFFIDAVIT

Affidavit of Wayne Ferron, 25th/26th OCCURRENCE Pursuant to Rule 32

-2-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................


WAYNE FERRON -versus-

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADAMADAM PAULETTE MELANSON(INQ-002353)

MR. PAUL RICHARD(file# 7100-010299)EMPLOYMENT INSURANCE

MADAM J. SANTINOTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO

MR. PETER WESTGATE(Newmarket Courthouse, Crown Attorney)MR. PAUL TAIT(Assistant, Crown Attorney)

MR. JEFFREY COSTAIN(Assistant Crown Attorney) MS. JOANNE STEWART(Assistant Crown Attorney) MR. MATTHEW ASMA(Assistant Crown Attorney)

YORK REGIONAL POLICE SERVICESPEEL REGIONAL POLICE SERVICES

MR. H. M. Metcalf(Chief of Police)MR. PERKINS(Police Officer 2261)

WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEMDOCTOR JEFFRY HANDLER

DOCTOR KOCZERGINSKIDOCTOR R. HOOD

DOCTOR ACHARYYADOCTOR OHENE-DAR KOH

← MRS HAMILTON(Nurse in charge)THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL

ONTARIO-WORKSMS. NICOLE ARBOUR

MS. CINDY KREIGER(Caseworker #353)SALVATION ARMYMR. HARRY BOOM

AFFIDAVIT of APPLICANT (Wayne FERRON)

I, Wayne FERRON of the City of Mississauga, in the Regional Municipality of Peel, MAKE

OATH AND SAY :

[1] ONTARIO-WORKS:


-3-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

The following excerpts is from a letter I sent to Ontario-Works on or about the 2nd of

June 2011;

← “Dear Madame Cindy Kreiger (Caseworker #353);← it is a silent policy or an act of human decency to notify a person of your intended

action in the Canadian Democratic System of Governance. It indicates a level of human decency or human worth placed on others.

←← I took precious time and money out of my preparation from court to gather as

much of the information you requested. You should have notify me, so I could notify the Court and other parties of what I am presently capable of committing to. I am not wronging you for your decision. I am complaining for the absence of notification, and on this basis I have to file a complaint against you so that others after me will be treated more humane.

← {...}← The faster, the Appeal matter is completed (C51190), the faster I can have some

restitution to my pitiful life AND BE IN A POSITION TO SEE MY BELOVED CHILDREN. Removing, unjust criminalization to my person and record will remove a host of impediments in our society and return my life back to normalcy, along with the past opportunities I had.

←← The unreasonable delay in my matter at the court of Appeal has cost me my

retraining and the funding which went with it. It is not reasonable for you to expect me to trow away all the hard-work for my Appeal, my future and my children’s future for a 1 month training program which could be delayed for one month. Criminal court takes precedence.

←← Now your action whether knowingly or unknowingly has indirectly disrupted the

on going process by delaying me in fulfilling my legal commitments. At the end of this month I will be moving into a shelter. My Appeal was on June 14, that date is not possible know that you have delayed me by constraining me and forcing me to take time to deal with you and your decision. I will be Appealing your decision!”

[2] The following is taken from a complaint I filed with the PROVINCIAL HUMAN

RIGHTS MINISTRY concerning the events which took place while seeking emergency

shelter at Ontario-Works, financially supported or operated HOUSING - EMERGENCY

SHELTERS REGION OF PEEL at 1767 Dundas St. E./2500 Cawthra Rd. Mississauga.


-4-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

My said complaint was redirected to the proper Office of THE HUMAN RIGHTS

TRIBUNAL OF ONTARIO(HRTO), by Mr. Richard Hennessy on or before July 28, 2011.

[3] About two weeks prior to July 4, 2011, I called Cawthra Emergency Shelter to

request temporary housing for my child and I. In the initial part of the questioning, it was

brought to the attention of the shelter representative that Ontario - Works just

discontinued my financial assistance. The said person informed me that the same

Shelter Facility was operated by ONTARIO-WORKS and that she would have to review

my file at ONTARIO-WORKS. I was asked to hold the line.

[4] Upon the Shelter representative’s return to the phone conversation, I was informed

that the conversation would have to continue another time. I took this as a normal part

of the process for admitting a family to the said shelter. I was not told that the shelter

was full or that their were present problems which prevented my admittance. In short I

though the shelter needed an interval of time to complete a required investigation for a

families admittance.

[5] I recalled the Emergency Shelter after a couple of days, after a brief introduction I

was informed that the shelter staff was moving or rearranging attendance around to

make room and to call back later. I was not informed that the shelter was full or that

there were present problems which prevented my admittance, I was only asked to call

back at a later time. The phone I was using was not my own so it is not a good method

of contacting me.


-5-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[6] I phone the Emergency shelter yesterday in the evening and the male person who

answered hang the phone up after a brief introduction.

[7] On the 4th of July, 2011, I phone the Emergency shelter yesterday again, and the

female person who answered told me the shelter was full and hang the phone up.

[8] I phone the Emergency shelter again, and the female person who answered told me

the shelter was full, and to “go to Brampton” and then she hung the phone up on me

again.

[9] Yet again, I phone back many times and no one was answering the phone. So I

started leaving messages such as; “I WOULD LIKE TO BE ASSESSED”, “ I WILL BE

FILING A HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT AGAINST YOU”, and “I WOULD LIKE TO

SPEAK TO YOUR MANAGER”.

[10] After leaving numerous messages; upon phoning the Emergency shelter yet again

and the female person who answered told me that the shelter was having a medical

emergency and to call back in an hour. I asked her who I should ask for and to disclose

the managers name. She said his name is “Rodrego”. I asked her to spell it and she

promptly aborted the call. This happened at or about 7:26 P.M. on July 4, 2011.


-6-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[11] I phone the Emergency shelter again on the same day, and a different female

person answered. She said they were full. I asked to be assessed anyway and that I will

be coming the next day to be assessed. I asked for the managers name and requested

to speak to him. She said his name was “Sean”, and no managers would be in till 8.00

A.M. the next morning. I requested the manger’s first initial and last name so I could

properly identify him. She put me on hold. It was at this point that I gave up on the

conversation and decided to file my complaint.

[12] I get the impression that the staff is taking my plight as a joke. Which was caused

by unfortunate events. To treat a person in such an unprofessional manner with total

disregard for the pitiful desperate position his life is in, has no excuse which I will

except. It is hard enough to muster confidence and ask for shelter, because of your

shameful inability to provide for your children and self.

[13] OFFICER PERKINS(2261):On the 25th of August 2011 at about 11:30 P:M, I was sleeping against the electrical-

pole and to the side of the of the fire hydrant facing the public road (Municipality

property), two unidentified uniformed individual approached me. On the 26 th of August at

after 12:00 A:M, I found out indirectly, but not from the two unidentified uniformed

individuals that they were Officers who were driving Cruiser 52 and worked out of

DIVISION 12.

[14] The male Officer of 12 DIVISION and Driving Cruise 52 was Officer Perkins(2261)

and Officer X who is still unidentified was the female occupant of Cruiser 52 and worked


-7-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

out of 12 DEVISION. It should be noted that I wear corrective lenses, which I was not

wearing or in possession of on the dark night in question. Furthermore, in addition to

the said Officer’s not wearing Police hats with nice shiny brass badges affixed to the

front of the said police hats, security uniforms, paramedic and police officers uniforms

are all black and similar in the dark of night.

[15] The following is a description of Officer X;

Officer X refused along with her partner Officer Perkins (2261) to state her name and

badge number when asked in clear, direct, precise language upon more than 10

request for the said information in violation of their professional standard of duty and in

accordance with the Police Service Act;

Officer X has no visible Badge number;

Officer X has no badge number sown into what appears to be her uniform;

Officer X may be of south east asian origin;

Officer X may be about 160 lb and about 5 4” tall;

Officer X may have shoulder length Black hair.

[16] On the 22nd of August 2011, I was discharged from the 2500 Cawthra Rd.

Homeless Shelter by Ontario-Works worker (Ms. Nicole Arbour), on the 22nd of August

2011, in violation of Section 1. of the Human Rights Legislation. Their has also been

others who has lived at the said Homeless Shelter for longer period of time than me.


-8-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[17] On the 25th of August 2011, at about 11:30 P.M. I was arrested by Officer 2261

(Perkins) and Officer X for Trespassing on 2500 Cawthra, Homeless Shelter’s property.

Not only was I deceived, lied to and mislead by Officer 2261 (Perkins) and Officer X

who drove Cruiser 52 but they hid their identity and refused to identify themselves even

after being requested after 10 times in clear direct precise language In contravention of

the Police Service Act and Section 15 of the Charter. But I was also informed that I was

being arrested and taken to 12 DIVISION for processing under false pretense in

contravention of Section 361 of the C.C.; in contravention of Section 15., Section 10

and Section 7. of the Charter of Rights and Freedom.

[18] I was sleeping outside with a rather large Umbrella (red/white), position over my

head and a gray knitted winter hat with Rogers embroider on it in red, pulled down over

my eyes.

[19] A voice asked me what I was doing their. I said;

“state your name and business please,”

without turning or moving. I had not changed my position of laying down on my back

while sleeping, nor had I removed the knitted hat covering my eyes nor the umbrella

covering my head.

[20] From under the said hat covering my eyes and under the umbrella, I could see four

feet, two pair of legs, covered in black military style pants and military style boots.


-9-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[21] I asked the two unidentified person’s which appeared to be a Police Officer, but I

was not sure. The security agencies design their uniforms and decorate their vehicles to

look similar to Police Officers and their operating equipment. In short, the security

presentation of themselves and their vehicle mimic the police force; even though this

might not be the case at the location in question, it has been my observation while

working as a technician in Richmond Hill and having to gain access to secure locations.

It is also bad practice and bad logic to assume important information which has great

ramification on ones life.

[22] I asked for about than ten or more times in a loud, clear and direct voice in the

following manner;

“please state your Name and Badge Number?”

[23] The two uniformed individuals refused to without Police Officers hats, refused to

disclose their names and badge numbers. I still don’t know Officer X name and badge

number.

[24] I repetitively informed the two uniformed individuals refused to without Police

Officers hats in clear and precise directed language, that it is a violation of the Police

Service Act, not to disclose your name and badge number when a request is made from

a citizen of the community.


-10-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[25] The two said individuals, still refused to disclose their name and Badge Numbers,

as if we live in a Police State; or maybe I should draw an adverse inference that it is just

the beginning of one?

[26] The two unidentified individual, informed me that I was trespassing on 2500

Cawthra Rd.’s property and furthermore, I was under arrest. The lead male unidentified

person approached me with is right side facing me and is left shoulder facing away from

me and towards the road.

[27] I asked the said unknown individuals, under what section of the Criminal Code am I

violating and if I was being taken to the Police Station for processing. I wanted to know

the lawful authority they had or was using for touching my person and arresting or

pretending to arrest my person.

[28] The two unidentified individuals asserted to my person, affirmed to my person, and

confirmed to my person in the affirmative; when asked repetitively in clear and concise

directed language, if I was being taken to the Police Station for processing? The male

person of the two unidentified persons answered in the affirmative while the female

remained silent.

[29] I was placed in what appeared to be a white squad car, since it had the number 52

written on it. I would assume this was Cruiser 52. It is important to note that two


-11-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

unidentified uniformed person placed me in the prone position with my hands cuffed

behind my back.

[30] Furthermore, the unknown persons took carriage and control over my person as

well as my belongings. The following items were taken from me;

blue book bag, small black and white back pack, red and white umbrella, small pink and

yellow and white note book, white mat, wallet with OHIP card and bank card etc. ,

personal hygiene bag with personal hygiene products, clothes, data CD, PC pay as you

go cell phone, and small thin folder like bags with possible court papers or documents

which has some relationship to the judicial process. None of the aforesaid items taken

from me and under the carriage and control of the two unidentified uniformed persons

was returned to me in a professional manner or even returned at all; this is contrary to

Section 337. (Public Servant Refusing to Deliver Property), of the Criminal Code of

Canada.

[31] The two unidentified person took me to a dark isolated location which I have never

been to, it was as though I lived in a Police State where homeless people or undesirable

individuals or unwanted Canadians can be picked up on a whim(arbitrarily), and be

treated as sub humans or inferior Canadians.

[32] This was an unlawful arrest and not in accordance with the the Criminal Code of

Canada or parliamentary legislation. In-fact the said occurrence was not even in

accordance with the Police Service Act. One cannot be arrested for an allege summary


-12-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

conviction matter (S. 495.2(b) of the C.C.). During this part of my unforgettable

ordeal, I was not officially placed under arrest, nor was I read my Rights or given

the opportunity to contact a lawyer and instruct the said lawyer forthwith, so that

the application of my rights could be administered to.

[33] The two unidentified persons who had carriage and control over me, over my

person, and over my belongings took me to me to a dark undisclosed location. While I

was being extracted, drag out or whatever the case maybe from the back seat of car 52

an extremely intense, riveting pain went up my left arm.

[34] I am an individual who has a high tolerance for pain. However, this said pain I could

not bear! My legs shivered while vibrating against the ground. I tried hard not to scream,

but I could not contain myself, so my voice burst out in a cry of agony. Indeed, I scream

with a deep painful hollow, like a pitiful dog weeping for mercy.

[35] The two unidentified persons removed the handcuff and I walked away as fast as I

could while holding my left arm in pain. I over heard one of them say let him go.

[36] At the first intersection I reached, which had traffic lights and intersected a well lit

road, I stopped and entered a Country Style Donut, on the right side of the said

intersection.


-13-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[37] I asked the lone attendant for direction to a major intersection (Steeles/Dixie). The

said person who was a young male of south east asian origin, directed me to turn left at

this intersection(present location), then make another left at the next intersection and

that main street(I think Dixie) will lead me to Steeles and Dixie.

[38] I turned left on the well lit road, just as the lone attendant had instructed me and

walked quickly to the next intersection.

[39] At this said intersection, there was I believe a Petro Canada Gas Station. I could be

wrong but it was a large Gas Station nonetheless. It was located on the right-side of the

intersection. I notice two Bell pay phones at the location of the said gas station close to

the road.

[40] I immediately used the Bell pay-phone to the left of the two phones to call for help!

This would be the orientation of my back towards the gas pumps and over looking the

well lit road. I called 911, and tried to explain that I was assaulted by unknown

individuals who said I was under arrest for trespassing and would be taken the Police

Station(Division-12), for processing.

[41] But the two unidentified individuals brought me to a dark isolated location which

caused me to fear for my well being and I was subsequently assaulted there, while

being removed from the vehicle. This was an assault in my humble opinion.


-14-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[42] I don’t know if the unknown persons intended to assault me, but they assumed

carriage and control of my person under an unlawful and deceptive arrest. The “Thin

Skull Rule” applies, you take your victim as they are. The aforementioned Actions was a

blatantly disregard for my rights and freedoms and runs contrary to Section 26.,

Section 15.(1), Section 219, Section 265, Section 268, Section 269, Section 128,

and the professional duty of care a Police Officer owes to members of the collective.

[43] Although the wound on my left finger is now healed and the part of my left little

fingernail which was severed by a blunt instrument, to and including the flesh beneath

the same fingernail; it has healed and is falling off. However, the missing part of the said

fingernail has not yet replaced itself.

[44] I assumed that the said blunt instrument was metal, so I requested and obtained a

“tetanus shot” to reduce the risk in developing lockjaw or gangrene. My left lower

part of my hand is still numb and I have stared to take anti inflammatory

medication(ARTHROTEC or DICLOFENAC).

[45] According to the Doctor I saw, intense force to the lower nerve in the arm can

cause numbness as result of the said nerve being inflamed. I am just hoping there is no

nerve damage. While I was at the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE (BRAMPTON

CIVIC HOSPITAL), for my 14 day Custody without being informed of that custody

and the reasons and justification for it in clear and precise articulation. Nor was I

informed of my rights in a meaningful way, nor was the application of my rights


-15-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

administered to in accordance with the Supreme Law of Canada. This is a blatant

violation of Section 10. and Section 7. of the Charter and Article 14 of The Internal

Covenant of Civil and Political Rights.

[46] Furthermore, I repetitively begged the medical staff to administer to the said wound

and stitch it up, to no avail. I asked for pictures to be taken to no avail. If one had look at

the wound on my small left finger, it is busted open against a blunt instrument and the

nail is cut into or penetrated and is lifting up and away from the major undamaged part

of the nail. Part of the same nail and apart of the flesh below the nail was severed.

[47] During the occurrence, I asked the 911 operator for an Ambulance to go to the

hospital to have my left arm looked at for damage and make a statement of the

occurrence, of the assault, and the misleading and deception of my person. The said

911, operator affirmed that the Ambulance and the Police was on their way.

[48] The Peel Regional Police arrived very quickly, far ahead of the Ambulance and

Paramedics. The Peel Regional Police arrived in three Cruisers with about four Officers

in less than five minutes in my opinion, to take a statement of my assault.

[49] Their was one Police Sergeant present (possible driving Cruiser 338 or 348, but I

not sure). The Police Sergeant’s Cruiser and the second Police Cruiser parked

perpendicular to the two Bell pay phones and in succession with the back of the

Cruisers facing the Petro Canada Gas Station. The third Police Cruiser parked adjacent


-16-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

to the first two Police Cruiser and with its passenger side facing the Petro Canada Gas

Station.

[50] The 911 operator said the Police were there now and she promptly ended the

conversation and hung up the phone prematurely. She aborted the call!

[51] I asked the Police Sergeant to state his name and badge number, which he

disclosed. I informed him that I want to make a statement in-regards to assault upon my

person. The said Police Sergeant replied and said he was there to take a statement.

[52] I started to give a statement, however I noticed that the said Police Sergeant did

not take out or was in possession of his memorandum notebook; but instead

suspiciously had his right hand close to and hovering over his side revolver with his five

fingers on his right hand separated at their maximum distance to each other.

[53] In addition to the aforesaid, the Police Sergeant legs were separated like in a yoga

stance with the left leg and left arm face forward and both legs apart for balance while

simultaneously bending his knees in the squat position like a cat does before it spring

forth to pounce on it’s prey. I feared for my life, because I felt threaten and I took this

action as such in accordance with Section 265.(1)a of the Criminal Code of Canada.

[54] So for the second time I called 911, to report that the Officers they sent were not

taking a statement, but acting in a threatening manner. But yet again, the same 911


-17-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

operator prematurely aborted the second call before I could relay my concerns of

the definite threat to my person. She basically hang the phone up in a angry tone

of voice!

[55] In my humble opinion, this is a reasonable apprehension of a threat to my well

being while it is cloaked in the Police Sergeant’s deceptive action of taking a statement

without his memorandum notebook and a writing instrument; while is dominant writing

hand is uneasily close to his side arm with his fingers on the said hand extended out

and away from each other at their maximum radial distance. This is an eminent threat to

my person.

[56] Given that the same 911 operator hung the phone up on me at a critical time; in

any case before I could relay a message or my concern of an eminent threat to my

person. As a direct result, I attempted to call 411 for the location of the nearest hospital.

The Police Sergeant was watching while I was dialing the number and note to himself

while whispering;

“oh it is 411!”

[57] The same Police Sergeant commanded me to step away from the phone while

trusting is left hand high and forward like a shield, with his legs balanced and

engage while his right hand is employed at his right side over his gun but not

touching it.


-18-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[58] I methodically stepped away from the Bell Phone and prostate myself

passively into the prone position on the paved asphalt above a steel metal drain,

with hands behind my back at the Petro Canada Gas Station. So that the

excessive amount of Officers on location in large numbers (about four), could see

that I was not acting in a threatening manner but in-fact had my hands behind my

back in a submissive prone position.

[59] Moreover, they had handcuffed my hands behind my back. The said occurrence

was way too scary and surreal. It had the aura of a all powerful system of governance or

a feeling of being trapped in a Police State. Remember that I was only trying to give a

statement of an assault and then I would proceed onward to the hospital to have my

wounds administered to.

[60] The Officers on location asked me to get up off the ground and stand. I refused and

countered by saying;

“so you can shoot me!”

[61] The Officers on location asked if they could take me to the hospital; I refused with

great concern of my safety, particularly injury to my person and well being.

[62] The said Officers on location strongly insisted that they take me to the hospital. So I

informed them with a loud voice in clear and direct language by asserting;


-19-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

“in accordance with Police Policy, if a suspect asked to be taken to the hospital

to check or be treated for injuries, the acting Officers or obligated to take the

suspect to the hospital or have the suspect taken to the hospital.”

The same Officers on location countered and asked;

“how do you know about Police Policy?”

[63] While all the afore said was taking place, Car 52(the fourth Cruiser on location)

arrived on location and parked parallel to the adjacent Cruiser, which parked adjacent to

the first two Police Cruiser and with its passenger side facing the Petro Canada Gas

Station.

[64] This increased the number of Officers on location to about 4 which infers that 4

Officers on location was not enough, so about 6 Officers was needed with 4 Cruisers to

take a statement of an alleged assault.

[65] So the two unidentified uniformed individuals whom assaulted me, lied to me,

deceived me, mislead me, refused to identify themselves to me before effecting an

arrest, and driving Cruiser 52 were indeed Police Officers of the Law and in the

apparent service of Her Majesty the Queen. Officer again requested of me to be taken

to the hospital in Cruiser 52.

[66] I countered and asked if it is common practice to take a rape victim back to the

raper? They replied by stating that it was not the same thing!


-20-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[67] Even though I am not entirely sure about the length of time, it felt or seem like

about 15 minutes or whatever the case maybe, and without being placed into custody or

under arrest; the Officers on location decided to forcefully place me in Cruiser 52 as

though I was not traumatized enough already even though I insisted on waiting on the

Paramedics(ambulance).

[68] Just imagine the magnitude of the Officers boldness and insensitivity to forcefully

try to man handle me and place me into Cruiser 52, the very vehicle that the unidentified

Police Officers had carriage and control of, in addition to assaulting me, deceiving me,

lying to me, and brought me to an undisclosed dark isolated location after blatantly

manipulating me into believing that I was being arrested and taken to the Police Station

(12 DIVISION) for processing. I insisted that I wanted to waited for the Paramedics and

go with them to the hospital.

[69] The Officers still insisted on forcefully putting me into Cruiser 52 and bringing me to

where ever they intend to bring me to; without effecting a lawful arrest or placing me

under custody or even obtaining my permission. Remember that the combine force and

actions of the Officers on location is being brought to bear on my person without my

express or implied permission and is void of any legislative justification.

[70] The only solution to justify their said actions which had abandon and forsaken the

Criminal Code of Canada was to have me declared Mentally Incompetent. This is simply


-21-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

a declaration of War on my Rights and Freedoms and in addition a confirmation or

activation of Psychological warfare on a member of the Canadian collective. This has

far reaching implication for society at large and cannot be allowed to be successful in

objective, purpose, application, or implementation.

[71] So when they forcefully picked me up with my hands hand cuffed behind my back

and placed me in Cruiser 52 in the prone position, I screamed for help in the following

manner;

“Help, please help me!”

[72] When the Police Sergeant held my neck at pressure points with his fingers and

other officers attempted to bend my legs at the knee. I screamed in the following

manner;

“Help me! They are hurting me!”

[73] When the Officers on location continued with in the aforesaid improper manner with

progressive increasing force and pressure, similar to a “little girl”, I let out the loudest

scream I possible could with my highest pitch voice.

[74] The officer on location stopped abusing me and backed off while returning my

person to the paved asphalt floor of the Gas Station close to the two Bell pay phones.


-22-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[75] During this part of my unforgettable ordeal, I was not officially placed under

arrest, nor was I read my Rights or given the opportunity to contact a lawyer and

instruct the said lawyer forthwith, so that the application of my rights could be

administered to.

[76] The Paramedics (two) arrived driving one Emergency Vehicle on location. I crawled

over to their vehicle with my hands still handcuffed behind my back. I ask them to

Identify themselves before I entered the vehicle. Both Paramedic refused to disclosed

their Identity by stating;

“Can’t you see the uniform.”

[77] Like I said the Paramedics uniforms are black, the security uniforms are black and

the Police uniforms are black. Furthermore, I wear glasses and cannot read the small

words on the patches or emblems, so in assessing the situation I rely on the Ambulance

‘s decals which was clearly labeled in addition to the assumption that the two apparent

Paramedics carried a much lower probability of risk of harm to my person.

[78] When I entered their vehicle, I was able to make a logical determination that the

said two person who refused to identify themselves are indeed paramedic from the

nature of their equipment and their persons in the bright interior light.


-23-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[79] The two Paramedics secured me in the regular way on the stretcher in the vehicle

with a handcuffs still on and proceeded to take me to the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH

CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, at 2100 Bovaird ave.

[80] One of the female Paramedic’s seemed to know the unidentified Officer which

accompanied use in the back of the Paramedic’s vehicle to the hospital personally. In-

fact, she asked him to ride in the back of the vehicle with us.

[81] The female Paramedic and the unidentified Officer talked about personal things

such as significant others and events. I am not sure if both Paramedics were female,

but I believe they were.

[82] The female Paramedic who was continually speaking to the unidentified Officer

who she knew personally was saying negative things about me. So I informed her that I

would be attending York university on a part-time basis and I recited a sonnet from

Shake Spear in order to counter her negative statement in a practical way.

[83] She believed and stated in a loud voice that I was reciting the Bible and not to

recite the Bible to her; as though their is something wrong with reciting the Bible even

though our Judicial system and a significant part of the way our society at large

functions is based upon the same Bible. How utterly Ironic!


-24-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[84] Like I said, the female Paramedic who knew the unidentified Officer riding with us

in the Emergency Health Vehicle mistakenly believed that I was reciting the Bible.

[85] The said Paramedic proceeded to inform the medical staff of the Brampton Civic

Hospital whom were processing me incorrectly, that I was reciting the Bible to her. The

following is what I recited;

“Let me not to the marriage of true minds admit impediments.Love is not love which alters when its alteration finds nor bends to remove its remover. Oh no.It is an ever fixed mark that looks at tempest and is never shaken.Love is not times fool thou rosy lips and cheeks within its bending sickle compass come.Love alters not with brief hours or weeks but bears it unto the edge of doom. If this be error then upon me prove I never writ nor no man ever loved.”(Shake Spear)

[86] For the aforementioned questionable actions by the Peel Regional Police, Dr.

Jeffery Handler placed me on a FORM 1. (after less than 1 min assessment), for

psychological assessment to determine mental illness or even mental

incompetence without even checking the damage to my left hand or

administering to it, the original reason I called 911 and requested to be taken to

the hospital.

[87] In addition to this, they were insisting that I have may brain bombarded with

charged sub atomic particles (CAT SCAN), thereby increasing the my chances to


-25-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

develop cancer, when I had no headache, no bumps on the head, no cuts on my head,

and I never requested one. Imagine, my Charter Rights are violated and the Criminal

Code of Canada is contravene on many occasion to violate the said Rights and I am to

be possible declared mentally incompetent.

[88] On the 26th of August 2011 in the very early morning (a guess of about 3:00 A.M),

while at the Brampton Civic Hospital, the unidentified uniformed individual who initially

arrested me, who assaulted me, who lied to, and who had carriage and control of my

unreturned confiscated material; finally disclosed his name and badge number after

being asked about three more times at the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM,

Brampton Civic Hospital, in the Emergency Ward. The unidentified uniformed person

was legally known as Officer Perkins (2261) and he drove Cruiser 52.

[89] On further examination under the bright light of the hospital at close proximity, it

was evident that Officer Perkins(2261) badge number was sown into his uniform(2261),

however he still was not wearing a Police hat with a shiny Brass badge affix to it.

[90] However, his female partner, Officer X, did not have a badge number sown into her

uniform, I still don’t know who Officer X is (her name and badge #).

[91] TAKE NOTICE: It is important to know that I do-not have perfect sight and cannot

afford to purchase and wear glasses which correct my vision’s deficiency.


-26-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[92] As an aside but very important; it seems like bad science or bad psychiatric

science is being practice in my humble opinion. It is good science and good logic to

check your instruments to be sound and capable of the required task.

[93] To insure that the scientific, social, moral and legal instruments you use to make

diagnoses, to probe and analyze your subject is checked for relevance, reliability, and

accuracy. The method, process and procedure used must be sound.

[94] Bias, error and compound errors must be minimized or eliminated, for it will render

the outcome false and useless. In short, reasonable apprehension of bias would have

perforated the process. The desired outcome of ones study would be forcefully

engineered, manufacture by bias and faulty instruments used to arrive at a

predetermined or desired outcome. The logic is faulty, the reasoning is contaminated

with logical fallacies. There are logical disconnects between the premise and the

conclusion. Furthermore, the basis of the argument, the premise and the assumptions

are faulty.

[95] At the Brampton Civic Hospital emergency ward, the medical staff spend the

overwhelming majority of time speaking to the police Officers as though they were the

patient and were the ones who had damage to their left arm from assault from Officer

Perkins (2261). The Peel Regional Police REPORT of the occurrence form the basis for

the Brampton Civic Hospital and its relevant staff Actions.


-27-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[96] BLOOD TAKEN:

The hospital staff took two vile of my blood without my given permission or without

being dully informed of the reasons or justifications for the said action.

[97] I now know that drug screening test was done on my blood; what I don’t

know is if some of my blood(bodily substance) is being used and stored as a

genetic fingerprint and who has access to it ?

[98] What does a drug screening test has to do with an officer assaulting my person

and me calling 911 for help? In addition my temperature, and my blood pressure were

taken. Even though my concern was with the damage to my left arm from the assault by

Officer Perkins (2261) who was driving Cruiser 52.

[99] I had to insist for them to look at my left arm and continue to insist up until the 29th

of August 2011. It was as tought their was already a predetermine objective and

purpose in-place and a process set up and ready to run you through and process you. It

made no difference what injuries I had and that I called 911 and requested to have my

injuries administered to.

[100] The medical staff was oblivious to my injuries, my medical concerns and even

though I repetitive request medical attention for my damaged arm. It was I who called

911 twice requesting for medical help to administer to my wounds after being assaulted

by Officer Perkins(2261).


-28-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[101] DR. HANDLER’S, FORM 1: On the 26th of August 2011 in the very early morning (a guess of about 3:00 A.M), the

Emergency Medical Doctor, Dr. Jeffry Handler, saw me for less than 1 min. I requested

that my left arm be looked after.

[102] Basically he walked into the room and placed or dropped a white sheet of paper

on the bed as though I do-not deserve or require due process; which I later found out

was a Form 42. which indicated on the back that I had the right to instruct a lawyer.

[103] This said Form 42. was not handed to me in my hand and explained in a

meaningful way nor was I informed of my Rights in a meaningful way nor was my

rights administered to forthwith. I was not even told of the existence, importance

or relevance of such a form, it was just thrown on the bed like I was a “dog being

fed.”

[104] CAT SCAN:This said Doctor, Dr. Jeffry Handler, with his prudent medical examination and analysis,

decided to admit me to Acute Mental Health care under Form 1. and have my Brain

CAT scanned. I had no cuts on my head, I had no bumps on my head, I had no

headaches, I was not suffering from trauma to the head.

[105] I am a person who doesnot get headaches. Sure, I was knocked in the head

many times with the door of Cruiser 52, but the Peel Regional Police would never have


-29-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

told the Doctor that bit of information. Although the Aforesaid would constitute assault

under the Criminal Code and the hits were firm, I don’t believe there was any damage to

my head because the force is distributed over a large surface area which is padded; in

contrast, my left arm was numb and my left finger and fingernail was bleeding and yet

the medical staff refused to apply medical treatment to it.

[106] So where is the medical justification for a CAT scan of my precious Brain? Or

more precisely, where is the medical justification to reradiate my Brain bombarded with

charged subatomic particles which have an adverse side effect of inducing free radicals,

which intern increase the likelihood for cancer or induce cancer for no good medical

reason.

[107] Furthermore, to have me assessed for mental illness and more than likely

declared mentally incompetent, without due process, without access to counsel and

without the application of my Rights and having them administered to forth with in

accordance with the Supreme Law of Canada.

[108] The security guard assigned to me, whom did-not understand the dynamic of the

CAT scan and could not articulate the process in scanning ones brain, was insistent on

this said test. He kept on repeating multiple of time that the doctor ordered it and I

should be taking it.


-30-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[109] The said security guard was so insistent and forceful in his language for this said

procedure, that the nurses who were responsible for the CAT scan medical procedure ,

had to boldly tell him in clear and direct language that;

“the patient has the last word on medical procedures!”

[110] Just imagine, a security guard, who is not a licence or trained medical technician

or medical professional at WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic

Hospital, has enough confidence to step outside the boundaries of his

authority(exceeding his jurisdiction), and to try and effect a medical procedure or

process under the carriage and control of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE,

Brampton Civic Hospital! This is very, very, very, scary!!!

[111] On the aforementioned basis, Dr. Handler in addition to ordering a CAT scan of

my Brain for no medical or an undisclosed medical reason to the patient made an

application for me to have a psychiatric assessment in the following manner;

“This is to inform you that Dr. Jeffry Handler examined you on 26/08/2011 and has made an application for you to have a psychiatric assessment.

The physician has certified that...he has reasonable cause to believe that you have:

✓behaved or behaving violently towards another person or have caused or are causing another person to fear bodily harm from you; or

✓shown or are showing a lack of competence to care for yourself and that you are suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or quality that likely will result in:

✓serious bodily harm to yourself;

✓serious bodily harm to another person; or


-31-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

✓serious physical impairment of you.

{...}

The application is sufficient authority to hold you in custody in this hospital for up to 72 hours.

You have a right to retain and instruct a lawyer without delay.”

[112] On the 26th of August 2011, Dr. Jeffry Handler did not in any shape or form

review or even inform me of the existence of Form 42 or Form 1, much-less in a

meaningful way. The medical staff did-not asked if I was capable of reading or had the

mental or intellectual capacity to understand Form 42.

[113] Furthermore, I am not a lawyer and Dr. Jeffry Handler was making an adverse

inference to my mental state so how could their possible be a reasonable assumption

made within the context of my understanding of Form 42., Form 1. (a legal document)

or the medical process that I was being subjected to.

[115] This is blatant defamation, a denial of due process, and a denial of my Section

7., Section 10. and Section 15. Charter of Rights; since it has no real basis in facts.

Furthermore, the Peel Police Officers know some of the medical staff which could be

coloured to their way of thinking for their task, their objective, and their purpose. Hence,

reasonable apprehension of bias.

[116] Where is the Standard of Reasonable Care? Where is the Duty of Care and its

implied covenant, not to do harm to your patients? I am being harmed! I feel as though I


-32-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

live in a Police State with fringes elements for improper personal missions. The said

fringed elements seemed to have the power and ability to use good medical people

vicariously to side step or circumvent the judicial process and force or engineer

desirable outcomes for legal cases they cannot win in open court before a fair and

impartial Tribunal in my humble opinion.

[117] On the 26th of August 2011, the 1st councilor who came to engage me in

conversation was unknown and I would like to refer to him as Councilor X. On the 26th

of August 2011, an unidentified person, slipped into the room I was being held in after

Dr. Jeffry handler’s less than 1 minute visit. No one has been able to identify or confirm

the existence of Councilor X.

[118] I was sitting on a blanket on the floor in a cross legged position when Councilor X

walked into the room and sat on the bed staring at me with a sinister look. He was a

male caucasian or possible a south east Asian person past his middle age or older than

middle age, about 5 feet 4 inches and had a similar size to a marathon runner. I am not

saying he was as fit as a long distance runner, but only that he had a similar body type

or physical appearance taking into consideration his clothes.

[119] He had on a black military style pant's (the kind security guards wear). He might

have been wearing a gray vest but I am not sure. He had a clipboard in his hand and a

constant grin which revealed all his upper front teeth while he sat cross-legged with a

persistent stare down at me.


-33-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[120] I wrongly believed that he was the psychiatrist; I wrongly believed that Councilor

X was the psychiatrist; maybe this was part of some plan of deception, I don’t know. But

this event was too strange for me not to take note of it, especially when the nurses on

the floor could not identify him or produce his name at my request. The first thing

Councilor X said to me was that I have a mental problem. He did not ask me but boldly

stated it in a soft direct tone of language in the following form;

“you have a mental problem”

[121] He made this statement repetitively many times while shaking his head up and

down in the affirmative manner. I countered repetitively by stating that I did-not have a

mental problem in clear, direct and concise language. In addition to the aforesaid,

Councilor X would randomly check off things on a clipboard he had in his hand.

[122] I eventually started talking about the occurrence with the Peel Regional Police.

While Councilor X became increasingly bolder in his questioning as time went on; he

started to ask leading questions, I deduced that he was trying to or attempting to get me

to agree with him or concur with his improper leading questions; which were not proper

questions but suggestion and professional advise with in the context of psychological

key words to catalogue mental disorders when probing ones mind. For example,

hearing voices, perceiving that someone is always following you, having special powers,

etc.


-34-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[123] After boldly denying the occurrence any of the things Councilor X was inferring,

advising or suggesting; I informed him that he was asking me leading questions.

Furthermore, that he was trying to stare me in a certain direction of his choosing, and

what he was trying to do would not hold up in Court.

[124] I became very suspicious and, requested that he identify himself in clear direct

precise language. He flashed an identification card with orange horizontal stripes or

strip on a white background, and asserted that he was a councilor. I Countered and said

that as a councilor you cannot ask psychological questions. Imagine the horror of a

councilor giving an appearance or presenting himself in the cloak of a psychiatrist or

acting in the capacity of a psychiatrist.

[125] This is about when the Session with Councilor X ended. Councilor X with a

slow motion movements ticked something off his clipboard with the same sinister grin

and left the room I was being held in.

[126] TAKE NOTICE: That a second councilor, a friendly middle age tall caucasian lady

came to speak with me later on in the morning and was more concerned with my well

being (housing, work, mobility), instead of leading questions, my mental state or covert

interrogation. So if this second councilor who the floor nurses confirmed is the councilor,

who was Councilor X and what was his objective and purpose?


-35-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[127] On the 26th of August 2011, Dr. Koczerginski, a psychiatric Doctor entered the

room I was being held in to engage me in conversation for the first time. Neither Dr.

Koczerginski nor any one else before him who came to speak to me, informed me of

my Rights in a meaningful way, or that I had a right to access or instruct council.

[128] On the 26th of August 2011, Dr. Koczerginski (a psychiatrist) with 30 years

experience and is a person in great authority, engaged me in uninformed conversation

while under the carriage and control of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton

Civic Hospital, when he and all who came before him to engage me in conversation

failed to inform me of my rights in a meaningful way, or advise me that I had the right to

retain and instruct counsel forthwith.

[129] As a result Dr. Koczerginski and I had uninformed discussion for about 30

minutes. Furthermore, I had a uninformed discussion or assessment or whatever

the case may with the said psychiatrist, a person in authority and whose words

carry great weigh in society at large, in the Judicial System and have great

ramification to my life and my beloved child dependent’s life, liberty, security and

pursuit of happiness; without being duly informed of my Rights, without having

access to a council to advise me, and without having a lawyer present. Dr.

Koczerginski at the end of the uninformed conversation asked me in a bold voice

with a clear and direct language;

“What can I do for you?”


-36-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[130] I silently placed an adverse inference on this question, to indicate Drugs in the

form of prescription. but I did not say this to the said Doctor because their was no

factual basis for it other than my interpretation and and opinion. The meaning of his

question was never articulated in a meaningful way. The said doctor informed me that

he would release me and a councilor(2nd councilor) would be meeting with me.

[131] On the 26th of August 2011, the 2nd councilor, a friendly middle age tall caucasian

lady, came to speak to me after Dr. Koczerginski had departed. We spoke about

housing , Onario-Works financial assistance, employment and what she was capable of

doing for me.

[132] She left me one lone Brampton Transit Bus ticket to go and do my business;

even though I informed her that I had an appointment with an employment councilor in

Mississauga(Dixie/Dundas), at Second Step Employment resource centre. Recall that

Officer Perkins(2261) who drove Cruiser 52, had taken carriage and control of my

personal belongings and failed to return them in a honourable professional manner. So I

did-not have my phone, my wallet, Bank-card or my many Bus tickets.

[133] On the 26th of August 2011, at or about 11:30 A.M., I was released and given

one Brampton bus ticket, even though Officer Perkins(2261) arrested me in

Mississauga.


-37-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[134] Since I missed my 11:00 A.M. appointment at Dundas/Dixie, at Second Step

Employment resource centre, I went to 22 Division, given that I overheard the officers

inquisition referring to it as their Head Quarters.

[135] On the 26th of August 2011, at or about 1:30 P.M., at 22 Division, I requested the

name of Officer 2261 who was driving Cruiser 52. It took a long time to get the

information. The 22 Division Officers initially refused me the information, but I informed

them that the police service Act require an Officer to disclose his Badge number and

name upon request.

[136] The attending Officer at the station reluctantly disclosed Officer 2261 name as

Perkins, but not his full name even after being asked twice. It should be noted that the

attending Officer had written Officer 2261 name on a small yellow sticky note, I

took it an placed it on a Form D, which was titled REPORT REQUEST FORM, and

hid it in my red fall jacket.

[137] On the 26th of August 2011, at or about 2:00 P.M., I went across the street to the

A GRENVILLE and WILLIAM DAVIS COURTHOUSE to file a Private Information and

to take an Oath of reasonable belief of the crimes which were committed against my

person; so I my seek the ends of justice in an open, a fair and impartial court of

competent jurisdiction. As directed and prescribe by the Criminal Code of Canada and

in accordance with the interest of justice.


-38-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGSSection 788(1) Proceedings under this Part shall be commenced by the laying of an information in FORM 2.

Section 789. (FORMALITIES OF INFORMATION)The information must be in writing and under oath

IN WHAT CASE JUSTICE MAY RECEIVE AN INFORMATIONSection 504. “Any one who, on reasonable grounds, believes that a person has committed an indictable offence may lay an information in writing and under oath before a justice, and the justice shall receive the information, where it is alleged...”

[138] On the 26th of August 2011, at or about 2:00 P.M., I signed my name as required

to see a Justice of the Peace as prescribe by law to file an information and swear an

Oath before him of reasonable belief and have my information commissioned. So that

the the wheels of justice could be set into motion to meet the ends of ethical justice for

the crimes and actionable wrongs committed against me.

[139] The Clerk at the Brampton Court House advised me that the proper procedure

was to file a complaint with the 12 Division. I informed the said Clerk of the Brampton

Court House that the process for a complaint would have me locked up in red tape for

the next two years, while my opportunity to meet the ends of justice slips away.

[140] Their is a six months limitation period on summary conviction offences.

Furthermore, Officer Perkins(2261) has carriage and control of my personal items such

as wallet, bank-card, bus tickets and phone; which he failed to return in a professional

manner. It was impossible for me to go to 12-DIVISION with the present mobility barrier

forced upon me by Officer Perkins(2261).


-39-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[141] On the 26th of August 2011, at or about 2:00 P.M., I came to Williams Davis

Brampton Court House a place of competent jurisdiction, which is prescribed by law and

give legislative authority to provide fair and equitable justice to all Canadians who seeks

it. And I certainly expected to get Ethical justice in a fair hearing, before an impartial

Tribunal. An information starts this process! This is what I was being denied.

Furthermore, this was a blatant denial of justice ad access to justice. Besides I was

being directed to the very people who assaulted me, traumatized me and scared the

crap out of me.

[142] After sitting down and waiting, the Clerk returned and call me to be spoken to.

She said or advised me that on Friday’s, private informations cannot be filed.

Imagine that, the interest of justice takes a holiday on Fridays and asked that

reasonable Canadians seeking the ends of ethical justice do the same, because

the Criminal Code of Canada is also on vacation.

[143] I fail to see or be informed of which parliamentary legislation is being used

to justify this injustice to the Collective conscious morality of this blessed land;

this was the 26th of August 2011 at about 2:30 P.M.. Officer Perkins (2261) had taken

my personal belongings and not returned them in a professional manner.

[144] So I had no wallet with my ID, or Bank Card or phone or any of my many bus

tickets. My Mobility was taken away by Officer Perkins (2261) improper actions. This is


-40-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

a manufactured barrier by Officer Perkins (2261). The aforesaid is a blatant violation of

my Section 7. and Section 15. Charter of Rights and Freedom. Furthermore, this is a

contravention of Section 504., Section 788, and Section 789. of the Criminal Code of

Canada.

[145] Asper the Police Service Act Declaration of Principal;

← POLICE SERVICE ACT: ← Declaration of principles← 1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the

following principles:← 1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in

Ontario.← 2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by

the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.

← 3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve.

← 4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.

← 5. The need for sensitivity to the pluralistic, multiracial and multicultural character of Ontario society.

← 6. The need to ensure that police forces are representative of the communities they serve. R.S.O. 1990, c. P.15, s. 1.

[146] Asper the The Federal Prosecution Service DESKBOOK;

← 11.2 Role of the Police: Authority to Investigate and Lay Charges← 11.2.1 The Common Law Principle← Maintaining the independence of the police from direct political control is fundamental to

our system of law enforcement. Under the common law, the police could not be directed by the Executive or by Parliament to start an investigation, much less lay charges. As one former Attorney General said, ““No one can tell an officer to take an oath which violates his conscience and no one can tell an officer to refrain from taking an oath which he is satisfied reflects a true state of facts””.2 In R. v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner, ex parte Blackburn,3 Lord Denning described the principle in this way:

← I hold it to be the duty of the Commissioner of Police, as it is of every chief constable, to enforce the law of the land. He must take steps so to post his men that crimes may be detected; and that honest citizens may go about their affairs in peace. He must decide whether or not suspected persons are to be prose-


http://www.ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/eng/fps-sfp/fpd/ch11.html#footnote2


-41-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

cuted; and, if need be, bring the prosecution or see that it is brought; but in all these things he is not the servant of anyone, save of the law itself. No Minister of the Crown can tell him that he must, or must not, keep ob-servation on this place or that; or that he must, or must not, prosecute this man or that one. Nor can any police authority tell him so. The re-sponsibility for law enforcement lies on him. He is answerable to the law and to the law alone.

← 11.2.2 The Special Situation of the RCMP← Section 5 of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act provides that the Commissioner of

the RCMP has the control and management of the Force, subject to the ““direction”” of the Solicitor General. The relationship between the Commissioner and the Solicitor Gen-eral has been described in the following terms by the Supreme Court of Canada:

← While for certain purposes the Commissioner of the RCMP reports to the Solicitor Gen-eral, the Commissioner is not to be considered a servant or agent of the government while engaged in a criminal investigation. The Commissioner is not subject to political direction. Like every other police officer simi-larly engaged, he is answerable to the law and, no doubt, to his con-science4.

(11.2 Role of the Police: Authority to Investigate and Lay Charges, The Federal Prosecution Service DESKBOOK)

[147] INFORMATION 07-02500/07-02559Concerning GO 007-70285, which happened on or about March 27, 2007; I was

arrested by the York Regional Police Services under the following conditions;

P.C.E. Beattie (#1075) with 3 years experience of 3A; who drove 3126 (cruiser 126),

contacted the complainant at 00:22 AM on the 28th of March 2007. This occurred 10

minutes after the initiation of the arrest and while officer Brown allege to have read the

Applicant his RTC.

[148] The complainant complaint of a strange and suspicious black male wearing

glasses, in his thirties and look clean cut; driving strangely in his own neighborhood.

Warranted 5 police cruisers and 6 armed police officers to investigate. Yet the

complainant sat waiting for about 20 wasted minutes, spoke to 3 of the 5 officers and



-42-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

not one of the 5 armed officers present with a collective sum of 40 years of law

enforcement experience failed to take a statement from him in there memoranda

notebooks.

[149] It would be prudent to establish at this point that SSGT Bruce R. Ringler (#193)

with 30 years experience of 3D. The said officer is the officer in-charge of the facility.

[150] Asper May 9, 2008 Trial Transcript on page 82. Officer Burd (1075) states during

the Prosecutor’s examination in chief;

“Q. So after you learned that the individual had to voluntarily take the drug recognition test, what happened? A. At that point we all collaboratively spoke and decided the male would be arrested for impaired, further investigations would continue after that. Q. Now who arrested him? A. Uniformed officers I believe it was P.C. Monk that initiated the arrest. Q. Okay. What happened after it was decided that Mr. Ferron would be arrested for impaired, now when you say impaired, what do you mean by that? A. Impaired by drug and/or alcohol. Q. What happened at that point? A. At that point uniformed officers, led by P.C. Monk advised the male he would be under arrest and asked him to step out of the vehicle. Q. Where were you when this was going on? A. Directly beside the officers, approximately

three feet from the driver's door. Q. Okay who at that point was at the driver's door?

A. P.C. Monk, I believe there was three of them were there, P.C. Monk is that one that was initiating the arrest I believe. Q. What happened once Mr. Ferron was asked to step out of his vehicle? A. The driver refused to step out of the vehicle, P.C. Monk then unlocked the door of the van and lifted the male out of the driver's seat.” (Officer Burd (1075) , May 9, 2008 Trial Transcript on page 82. )


-43-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[151] Asper May 9, 2008 Trial Transcript on page 81, line 15-18. Officer Burd (1075)

states during the Prosecutor’s examination in chief;

“Not gain access but to speak with him, communicate with him is when you can detect the odour coming from the area of his mouth , attempting to look into the eyes, the pupils, could not.”(Officer Burd (1075) , May 9, 2008 Trial Transcript on page 81, line 15-18. )

[152] Asper the Criminal Code of Canada;

“A police officer’s right to arrest without a warrant is limited by subs.(2) of s. 495, which states that unless certain circumstances exist, an arrest cannot be made without a warrant for indictable offences listed in s. 553 ...,for hybrid offences, or for summary conviction offences. A police officer cannot make an arrest without a warrant unless he or she considers, on reasonable grounds, that it is in the public interest to do so. ‘In the public interest’ is a general term which means that the safety and well-being of the public is to be given priority.”

(CRIMINAL LAW and the CANADIAN CRIMINAL CODE, Third Edition, page 107, para 3)

[153] Reasonable Grounds:“In General, reasonable grounds are grounds that would lead an ordinary, prudent, and cautious person to have a strong and honest belief about the situation at issue.” (CRIMINAL LAW and the CANADIAN CRIMINAL CODE, Third Edition, page 405)

[154] Five Officers; and not one of them has time to take a statement from the Com-

plainant, even though the I was detained on location for about twenty minutes, while the

Complainant was on location. They had time to verbally assault me by calling him

“crack head”, “asshole” and to inquire what he was doing in the Georgina area, even

though I have lived in the said area for four more years than the Complainant.

[155] The Officers had time to talk and joke about there new suits.

They had time to call Rogers in the hope of getting me fired; in my humble opinion.


-44-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

They had time to walk back and forth to my vehicle for about 20 minutes, for only God

knows how many times.

They had time to do a visual search of the cab of my vehicle.

They had time to shine the flashlight into my eyes, causing me pain.

They had time to assault and batter me by slapping my hat off my head.

They had time to feed the Complainant false information concerning my allegedly refus-

ing to exit his vehicle; even though it is against York Regional Police protocol, for me to

exit the vehicle without a Police Officer’s direction. This would have been justification

for the use of deadly force force. Three of the Officer has time to taint and colour the

complainant’s testimony.

[156] All five Police Officer had time to detain and watch the Plaintiff doing “nothing” for

twenty minutes. But not one reasonable prudent cautious Officer! Not one officer had

time to take a statement from the Complainant while the information was fresh in his

mind. Not one Officer within the twenty minutes of detainment had time to inform me of

my Rights in a meaningful way and to execute those Rights without delay within the

meaning of section 10. of the Charter of Rights. Not one reasonable prudent cautious

Officer, with a honest strong belief of the situation at issue, out of the five!

[157] The Officers official given and excepted reasons for the aforementioned issues

are; they were too busy with me or they needed every officer to control me or

Cause they didn’t need to. Supposable, busy with me, doing nothing. It was my rea-

sonable belief that there was a problem in understanding how the aforementioned ac-


-45-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

tions translated into a professional investigation of reasonable prudent cautious police

officers. This was a tortious act of negligent investigation tainted with racism byway of

false arrest and a violation of the duty of care owed to me, when about Her Majesty’s

business.

[158] The Officers seemed to have forgotten or disregarded the original purpose in GO

2007-70285. To investigate the Complainant’s complaint.

[159] This resulted in the filing of a second Information 07-02559 which I was not

officially notified about until the 3rd of August 2007. This induced confusion and tortuous

acts within the process; of the same suspect being charged twice for two of the same

crimes and, which induced damage to my reputation and integrity.

[160] On the 27th of July 2009, a Hearing date for a prior filed motion before the

Honourable Justice Boswell, Application to Admit evidence for Inmate Appeal. Of

particular interest in the Application; was a request to cross examined Officer B. Hird

(who is legally known as William Hird (6058) by the YORK REGIONAL POLICE

SERVICES), the informant or affiant for Information 07-02500 and Joe Willmets (974),

the informant or affiant for Information 07-02559.

[161] I am alleging Both Officers to have swore false Oaths for there reasonable belief

of personal knowledge of GO 2007-70285 in there respective Information against the

Applicant. Mr. Tait for the Crown argued against the said Officers (who were never


-46-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

called or whose Officer’s notes has never been disclosed for the summary conviction

trial or the Appeal of right at the Appellate Court), to give evidence in respect to there

respective Informations against the Applicant with regards to there reasonable belief,

the truthfulness of their allegations, and personal knowledge of GO 2007-70285.

[162] This in the my humble opinion, was a lack of due-diligence, and desire to vet the

allegations in the informations in the initial phase of the process; moreover, an

opposition to both Informants respectively defending and justifying there respective

Informations against me(Wayne Ferron), which are allege to contain false oaths

(perjury) by way of a defective Jurat, byway of an Information not worded accordingly

for an informant who does-not have personal knowledge of the allegation stated in a

FORM2.

[163] The Motion was dismissed for not fulfilling the requirements for introducing new

evidence in a summary conviction Appeal. Furthermore, Justice Boswell affirms that the

Judgement conviction Ruling on September 26, 2008 was made on the bases of

Section 504, 506, 788 of the C.C. and RULE 30.

[164] Absent of amendments to cure defects in the Information 07-02500 became null

and void, incapable of giving to the Presiding Judge Jurisdiction over the allege charges

on the commencement of the Trial or the arraignment of the applicant, in my reasonable

belief.


-47-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[165] Pursuant to Section 523(1.1) of the C.C., there is no process for Information

07-02559 to rely on, since Section 505 and 508 was bypassed in its reliance on

Section 504, 506, 788 of the C.C. and RULE 30; Information 07-02500 is a nullity, in

my humble view.

[166] Given that Information 07-02559 did not find process and is correct, there was no

process for the same Information to rely on. Since, there is an absent of process for

information 07-02559 and the same information did not invoke Section 523.1 to use the

process for Information 07-02500, so I am at the minimum alleging that the said

information was a nullity.

[167] Accordingly, the face of the Information 07-02500 and Information 07-02559 indi-

cates that it is sworn by a Justice of the Peace, but the section that provides for the con-

firmation of appearance notice, promise to appear, recognizance by the Justice of the

Peace is completely blank.

[168] Given all theses irregularities, the York Regional Police had no problems charging

me and the Crown had no difficulty in prosecuting and convicting me. Now more than

three years later on or about the 26th of September 2011, I am barred without lawful

excuse from filing charges against Officer Perkins(2261) in contravention of Sec-

tion 504. of C.C. and Section 15. of the Charter for unlawful arrest, assault/battery

and the confiscation of my personal property without lawful excuse while engaged in de-

ceptive covert behaviour unbecoming of an Officer of the Law in active service of Her

Majesty the Queen.


-48-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[169] INFORMATION No.: 09 - 14407: Similarly, A GRENVILLE and WILLIAM DAVIS COURTHOUSE had no problems or

inhibitions with commissioning Information No.: 09-14407 against my person even

though there was errors and discrepancies in the factual evidence they were basing the

charges on for the said information.

[170] On the 2nd of September 2009, at about 9:00 A.M. Madame Angela Pasquale

advised me that there was no need to attend any more probation appointments.

However, if I moved I must contact and inform her of the same move. The Probation

Order(07-02559) was officially expired on the 25th of September 2009 asper the

Honourable Justice Kenkel’s orders. At the said meeting I asked the Probation Officer

where I should report to, to be charged for not seeing there psychiatrist.

[171] She asked why I will-not see the in house psychiatrist. I boldly asserted to the

probation officer, that it was immoral to ask someone to go and see the institution’s

psychiatrist without written articulated reasons or justification!

[172] At the same meeting on the 2nd of September 2009, I also presented Madame

Angela Pasquale with a formal information requisition for the third time.

Requesting a copy of the T.A. Patterson’s subjective Drugs/Alcohol assessment

and other information. She had advised me before the Drugs/Alcohol subjective test

was administered, that the results would be available for disclosure if I requested it.


-49-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[173] So I presented her with the aforementioned document in her office during the last

of the regular meetings. When the meeting was over and I was leaving, she violated my

personal space and aggressively placed the said document in my backpack (“stuffed it

in”) with sufficient force for me to feel the resulting force applied to the backpack. Which

was on my back at the time, without my permission or lawful justification. This is assault

for doing a lawful Act of serving legal material. Furthermore, the same unlawful act was

committed under the watchful eye of the facilities security camera.

[174] I removed the said document from my backpack, dropped it on the floor and

advised Madame Angela Pasquale that the citation for the laws which form the basis for

my requisition, were in the document. She boldly announced to my person;

← “get out, or I will have you escorted out !”.

[175] Even-though she knows the details of GO 2007-700285 and my complaint of

Police brutality, defamation and the trauma the I received to my life and my person at

the hands of fringe elements in the York Regional Police. She humiliated my person in

front of her co-workers and causing me to fair for my safety. I left quietly, proceeded

outside to sit and make a written record of the event.

[176] The aforementioned incident took place after the successful completion without

incident of the Probation Order (07-02559), and after the Jurisdictional Authority over

me(Wayne FERRON), given to the MINISTRY of COMMUNITY SAFETY and


-50-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

CORRECTIONAL SERVICES by the NEWMARKET, ONTARIO COURT OF

JUSTICE(Justice Kenkel’s Order) had expired.

[177] On November 06, 2009 after the successful completion without incident of the

Probation Order(07-02559), Madame Angela Pasquale successfully requested and

obtained the ORDER ON DISMISSAL OF APPEAL, Justice Healey’s Ruling(07-02559),

affirming my conviction. This is in on page 48 of documents disclosed to my person

from the the MINISTRY of COMMUNITY SAFETY and CORRECTIONAL SERVICES

byway of the freedom of information.

[178] On the 21st of October 2009, after the successful completion without incident of

the Probation Order(07-02559), Madame Angela Pasquale unsuccessfully tried to effect

an OFFENDER ALERT , for specific offender concerns of suspected mental health

problems. This is on page 53 of documents disclosed to my person from the the

MINISTRY of COMMUNITY SAFETY and CORRECTIONAL SERVICES byway of the

freedom of information.

[179] Again the aforesaid happened after the successful completion without incident of

the Probation Order (07-02559), and after the Jurisdictional Authority over me(Wayne

FERRON), given to the MINISTRY of COMMUNITY SAFETY and CORRECTIONAL

SERVICES by the NEWMARKET ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE(Justice Kenkel) had

expired.


-51-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[180] After the successful completion without incident of the Probation Order (07-

02559), Madam GLORIA GINGRICH, improperly set the full force of the wheel of justice

against the me(Wayne FERRON) when she took an oath of reasonable belief of the

truthfulness of the allegations contained in Information No.: 09-14407 and filed the

said information against my person.

[181] After the successful completion without incident of the Probation Order(07-

02559), Madame Angela Pasquale successfully induced her comrade Madam GLORIA

GINGRICH, the Informant or affiant of Information 09-14407, to improperly and

unnecessarily bring the full force of justice against my person; by causing me to be

harass, by causing me to diverted my efforts to reconstructing my life back to normalcy

and affect my studies at Seneca College. Moreover, these said actions placed a

manufactured barrier in opposition to my efforts in reconstructing my life back to

normalcy.

[182] Furthermore, Madame Angela Pasquale and Madame Gloria Gingrich, has cause

the my person unnecessary aggravation and mental distress, further Criminal branding

and social stigmatization; while being engaged in malicious procurement of Information

09-14407 in addition to two summons.

[183] The prosecutor who had carriage and control of the said information said to my

person in no uncertain terms;

“We cannot prove this!”


-52-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

while referring to Information 09-14407 in the hearing on the day that it was to be

Withdrawn.

[184] On 26th of October 2009, PROBATION AND PAROLE filed OCC.# PR09198646

and Information No.: 09 - 14407 against my person(Wayne FERRON). For alleged

failure to Comply with (TREATMENT) without reasonable excuse, contrary to section

733.1(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The prosecution was seeking 15 day jail to

be commence on the successful completion of the prosecution’s case.

[185] I was SUMMONED AS A PERSON CHARGED WITH AN OFFENCE; to appear

on the 8th day of December 2009, at 9:00; for the purposes of the identification of

Criminals Act; to be fingerprinted and photograph at Peel Regional Police, 7750

Hurontario Street, Brampton, Ontario. It should be noted that the only question the

Officer conducting the fingerprinting and photographing asked me was;

“Where were you born?”

[186] I was SUMMONED AS A PERSON CHARGED WITH AN OFFENCE; to appear

on the 21st day of December 2009, at 12:00; for the purposes of the identification of

Criminals Act; to appear before a Judge and be spoken to at A GRENVILLE and

WILLIAM DAVIS COURTHOUSE, 7755 Hurontario Street, Brampton, Ontario.

[187] The humiliation, criminalization, social stigmatization, and aggravation was a

foreseeable consequence, when the full force of the wheels of justice was improperly


-53-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

set into motion by the malicious procurements of Information 09-14407 and its two

related summons.

[188] The Crown alleged that the Applicant, fail to ATTEND COUNSELING under

COUNT ONE for charges laid by Information No.: 09-14407. The Crown alleged that the

Applicant, fail to comply with Probation (TREATMENT) without reason excuse, contrary

to section 733.1(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

[189] There was no definition, articulated reasons, justification, purpose or desired

objective given for the alleged “TREATMENT”. Moreover, the word of interest,

“TREATMENT”, was not defined, its meaning and definition was in question. I

challenge the Crown to produce an articulated hard copy of documentation with respect

to the PURPOSE, METHOD and OBJECTIVE of the so called, “TREATMENT,” that

was in question.

[190] The Crown allege that on November 24, 2008, I was provided with both verbal

and written instructions to attend for a substance abuse assessment on February 4th,

2009.

[191] There was no articulated reasons, justification, purpose or desired objective given

for the alleged substance abuse assessment. There was no identification of the

alleged substance being abused or implicated in an abuse, or explanation as to how


-54-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

long it was being abused, or documented negative effects of its abuse. In short, there

was no history for the aforesaid.

[192] I challenged the Crown to produce a hard copy of the alleged document of the

written instructions to attend for the substance abuse assessment that is in question.

[193] The Crown asserts, that on July 8th, 2009, the I reported for probation

supervision. That I was advised that to date, I had not complied with any of the

conditions of my order. The Crown contends that I continued reporting for

probation supervision however I did not comply with the treatment portion of my

order, as directed by the Probation Officer, contrary to section 733.1 (1) of the C.C.

[194] I respectfully asked the Crown through a further disclosure request for documents

supporting the aforementioned Crown’s positions on the 28 th of May 2010. The Crown

was not able to produce these documents or any other supporting evidence.

[195] On the 2nd of June 2010 in court room 103, the Crown formally withdrew its

prosecution for Information No.: 09 - 14407, on the record before the honourable pre-

siding Justice, for want of supporting evidence and inability to prove prosecution’s case.

[196] Again, given all theses irregularities, Probation and Parole had no problems

charging me and the Crown had no difficulty in trying to effect a prosecution in the

ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE, at the William Davis Courthouse.


-55-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[197] Now more than one year later on or about the 26 th of September 2011, I am

barred without lawful excuse from filing charges against Officer Perkins(2261) in

contravention of Section 504. of C.C. and Section 15. of the Charter for unlawful

arrest, assault/battery and the confiscation of my personal property without lawful

excuse while engaged in deceptive covert behaviour unbecoming of an Officer of the

Law in active service of Her Majesty the Queen.

[198] I saw this opportunity to see the ends of justice for crimes and actionable wrongs

committed against my person as the only one! The aforesaid was a artificial barrier to

entry in seeking the ends of justice and therefore cannot be morally, socially or legally

excepted by Canadians concerned with the social evolution of our society to a better

tomorrow.

[199] Thus, I did the only thing I could do in reaction to this injustice or

unreasonableness. Which is passive none violent resistance against injustices being

committed. One is allowed to challenge or test Rules for fairness, equity, and

reasonableness within reason ofcourse; to see if the said Rule can hold up under

examination in Court. In my humble opinion I was well within my right to make

Canadians aware of this injustice for Criminal Acts and acts of omission committed

against my person.


-56-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[200] I was being told to go to the Salvation Army, to go to 12-DIVISION, or comeback

another day. I have been to the Salvation Army and as far as I know they do not receive

an information, nor do they commission an information while endorsing its jurat.

[201] As far as I know, Police Stations for Law Enforcement, do-not place a person

before a Justice of the Peace to swear an oath of reasonable belief for allege crimes

committed against my person; thus receiving my information, completing all the judicial

responsibility to empower the Justice of the peace to issue process with respect to my

allegations.

[202] Furthermore, the Salvation Army and 12-DIVISION are not Courts of competent

jurisdiction for receiving a filed information and issuing process for the same information

within the territorial domain of Ontario. They simply do not carry out judicial functions, at

lease in my view.

[203] Not being a legal professional or interpreter of law, I fail to see were parliamentary

legislation states that Canadians cannot seek the ends of justice on Fridays within

regular business hours and in a Court of competent jurisdiction.

[204] Like I said, I fail to see how it is possible for the Criminal Code of Canada to be

taking regular vacation time on Fridays. Moreover, Section 504. of the Criminal Code

States in plane english;


-57-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

“Anyone who, on reasonable grounds, believes that a person has committed an indictable offence may lay an information in writing and under oath before a justice, and the justice shall receive the information, where it is alleged...”

[205] I declared in bold clear and language, so all present in the room could hear my

plea; that Officer Perkins (2261) took my personal belongings up-to and including my

wallet along with bus tickets and I had no means to travel other than walking.

[206] One cannot seek the ends of justice on a Friday? I don’t know of any

parliamentary legislation which says I cannot file charges on a Friday. I don’t know of

any parliamentary legislation which says I cannot file an information to seek the ends of

justice, but must instead file a complaint to set the wheels of justice into motion for

unlawful actions and acts of omission? If the the aforesaid parliamentary legislation

exist, then I wish for a judicial officer to show them to me!

[207] So I laid on the floor in a passive prone position with my hands behind my back in

a submissive position and politely ask to be arrested because there was no other place

to go for business of this nature.

[208] I asked an Officer with a strong Scottish or Irish accent (I am not sure of the

origin), to disclose his name and Badge number, which he did. The said Officer ask me

to disclosed my name, which I did while in the submissive prone position with my hands

behind my back. I disclosed my name by saying it in a loud clear direct voice and then

spelling my last name for clarity.


-58-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[209] Officers pulled me up off the floor while choking me with the collar of my shirt; one

officer grab me with a very strong hand while positing all five fingers of the same hand

around my neck or throat. I Informed the said Officer that his hands was around my

neck. He made the following statement in reply;

“I am just steading you;”

[210] While slowly peeling his hand from around my neck and away from it. The

aforementioned incident left a 3 to 4 inch scar on the left lower side of my neck and I

had a soar throat in the left part of my throat for about 15 days; which Dr. Siegel at the

Brampton Hospital said was a viral infection. But how was the tissue in the left part of

my throat broken to allow a viral infection in the first place, if it was indeed a viral

infection?

[211] TAKE NOTICE: That my hands never moved from behind my person, I

maintained the profile of none violence, passive resistance. It should be noted that my

hands was behind me during this whole occurrence.

[212] On the 26th of August 2011, at or about 2:30 P.M., I was arrested for Resisting

arrest and Trespassing on William Davis, Brampton Civic Court property with my

hands handcuff behind my back.


-59-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[213] I informed all the relevant Officers for more than likely 20 times or more; that I will

not participate in uninformed conversation without the counsel of my lawyer, nor will I

make uninformed statements, I need to see and be advised by my lawyer first.

[214] Furthermore, I advised the said Officers that I was exercising my guaranteed

Charter of Rights to remain silent. This in no way phased the relevant Officers, they

were persistent and relentless in trying to engage me in uninformed conversation

without my lawyer present the entire time I was under their Carriage and Control.

[215] Later on, some Officers even felt insulted because I chose not to speak to them

but chose to speak to the Hospital medical staff. I was read my rights and handed over

to another set of Officers who searched the pockets of my red jacket and in between the

inner fabric and outer fabric of my jacket without my permission or a warrant.

[216] I had hidden the small yellow sticky note with Officer Perkins (2261) name and

Badge number written on it by an Officer from 22--DIVISION. The said sticky note was

stuck onto a copy of Form D, which was titled REPORT REQUEST FORM, that I had

picked up at 22-DIVISION at about 1:30 P.M..

[217] I no longer have these documents. The Officer driving the Police Cruiser which

transported me to the Hospital, extracted the said documents between the inner fabric

and outer fabric of my read jacket. I have absolutely no idea what the said Officer did

with the same documents. The documents just simple vanished into thin air.


-60-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[218] The yellow sticky note with Officer Perkins(2261) name written on it by a 22-

DIVISION Officer and subsequently stuck onto a copy of Form D, which was titled

REPORT REQUEST FORM; were lost, taken, confiscated or whatever the case may be

between this present event in the Occurrence and my release from Custody from the

WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital.

[219] The important thing is that the Peel Regional Police and the WILLIAM OSLER

HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital security had carriage and control of my

documents which are now missing and were never returned to my person.

[220] The aforesaid establishes the mens rea for crimes committed against my

person. This said document was the only thing missing with the exception of what

Officer Perkins(2261) had Originally taken and not returned in a professional manner. I

would like some honour and integrity to be shown, and my documents and all personal

material which were taken without lawful excuse, be returned to my person.

[221] WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEMS:On the 26th of August 2011, at or about 2:30 P.M., I was arrested and Transported in a

Cruiser with gray hard plastic back seat, with my hands behind my back to the

WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEMS, Brampton Civic Hospital at 2100 Baviord Dr.

Brampton, Ontario. I was handcuffed for ungodly long hours from about 2:30 P.M.

to about 12:00 A.M.; I was handcuffed at the Brampton Court House, in the


-61-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

transporting squad car, and in the emergency waiting room. I desperately tried to find

ways to cope with the fatigue and pain from the cold metal handcuffs.

[222] For this action of passive none violent resistance in seeking the ends of ethical

justice at the A GRENVILLE and WILLIAM DAVIS COURTHOUSE as prescribed by the

Criminal Code of Canada, I was placed into custody in Acute Mental Care to have my

mental state assessed and more than likely be determined to be mental incompetent;

thereby effectively circumventing my legal rights, Charter rights, Civil rights, and political

rights. Because the legal battle would be lost in open court, before a fair and impartial

Tribunal in a Court of competent jurisdiction. In this way victory could be declared with a

determination of mental incompetence with a great lost to society at large and our social

evolution.

[223] In essence or as a lesson in objectification and abstraction. The Officers and their

related Reports are just medical instruments or being used as analytical tools for a

psychiatric prognosis and mental illness assessment. It is self evident that Bias is

present from the start in this psycho analysis adventure.

[224] The Officer for all practical purposes and from the prospective of the Medical staff

at the Hospital are just medical instruments; relied upon by the medical staff to get an

initial profile or diagnosis of the relevant patients such as myself. But has anyone

checked and confirmed the said Officers to be honourable, honest, qualified medical


-62-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

professional giving initial mental state diagnosis, or even if they themselves are even

mentally competent.

[225] In short, are the relevant Officers acting in the capacity of medical instruments for

the medical staff of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital and

have the said medical instruments been checked and calibrated for soundness.

[226] Have the same medical instruments actions been confirmed to be honourable,

according to Police Policy, use of force policy, according to police protocol, according to

the Criminal Code of Canada, and according to the Charter of Rights and Freedom.

[227] DR. HOOD’S, FORM 1:

On Friday the 26th of August 2011, I was placed on FORM 1. by Dr. Hood to be

mentally assessed and possible declared mentally incompetent. According to the

medical staff, Dr. R. Hood saw me for about 7 minutes and she made the following

findings on the said basis;

[228] On the aforementioned basis, Dr. R. Hood for undisclosed medical reason to her

patient made an application for me to have a psychiatric assessment in the following

manner;

“This is to inform you that Dr. R Hood examined you on 26/08/2011 and has made an application for you to have a psychiatric assessment.

The physician has certified that...she has reasonable cause to believe that you have:


-63-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................




{...}



[229] On the 26th of August 2011, Dr. R Hood did not in any shape or form review or

even inform me of the existence of Form 42. or Form 1., much-less in a meaningful way.

The medical staff did-not asked if I was capable of reading or had the mental or

intellectual capacity to understand Form 42..

[230] Furthermore, I am not a lawyer and Dr. R Hood was making an adverse inference

to my mental state so how could their possible be a reasonable assumption made within

the context of my understanding of Form 42., Form 1. (a legal document), or the

medical process that I was being subjected to.

[231] This is blatant defamation, a denial of due process, and a denial of my Section

7., Section 10., and Section 15. of the Charter of Rights; since it has no real basis in

facts. Furthermore, the Peel Regional Police Officers know some of the medical staff

which could be coloured or tainted to their way of thinking for their task, their objective,

and their purpose in my humble opinion. Hence, reasonable apprehension of bias. For


-64-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

example, the female Officer kept on repeating all night that he(wayne Ferron) is

borderline or it is as-though he is borderline, yet she spent a great deal of time trying to

engage me in uninformed conversation after I informed the Peel Police Officers that I

need to speak to my lawyer and will not have uninform conversation with persons in

authority.

[232] She was diligent in taking notes when we were talking about similar things we

both do, such as running and physical workout. She was also familiar with the Hospital,

referring to a Chinese Doctor who had adverse feeling towards the police because of a

Highway occurrence between his wife and police officers. She named another one

which she had good experience with and are favourable in her view.

[233] TAKE NOTICE: I had not slept on the night of Thursday the 25th of August 2011.

Furthermore, I suffered from Trauma from the abuse from the Peel Regional Police, law

enforcement. Furthermore, I was kept for a very long period of time with my hands

cuffed behind my back and suffer from fatigue and trauma from the assault of Officer

Perkins (2261) and other Officers. In addition to this aforementioned, my back, hands,

and arms was extremely fatigue and I tried to deal with it along with severe depravation

of sleep as best as I could.

[234] ACUTE MENTAL HEALTH UNIT:Day-2 of my custody and self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner.

On Saturday the 27th of August 2011 at or about 4:00 A.M. I was moved into a holding

room in the Acute Mental Health Unit.


-65-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[235] There was two rooms in the said ACUTE MENTAL CARE unit, there was a face

wash bowl in the hallway, located between or on the outer wall of the first room which

was empty. A washroom was located across the hallway from the first empty room and

a lone security guard sat guarding at a location between the closes exit to the first room

and the washroom. Directly across from the second room which I was assigned to, was

a nurse station or observation room.

[236] I was assigned to the second room from the security guard and across from the

nurses observation room. My room had a camera or cameras contain in a dark

transparent black half globe which was installed on the right hand side on the ceiling. So

much for the Rights to Privacy or whatever they may call it these days.

[237] I move the bed to give me more space, and spread a blanket on the floor to do

my regular morning yoga practice. The 1st Nurse came from her nurses station across

the hallway and burst into the said room while declaring in a loud voice;

“who moved the bed.”

[238] She stated at close proximity to my person while looking into my face in a direct

voice;

“only crazy people exercise this early in the morning!”


-66-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[239] She was obviously, very upset at something or the other. Furthermore, the 1st

Nurse asserted that they think that I am crazy and that I was violent and

threatening people.

[240] I was only doing my Yoga practice on a blanket on the floor; which in my view

was not a big deal and a much smaller issue than she was making it out to be. Or

maybe I was unknowingly messing up some sort of observation in progress or whatever

the case may be?

[241] At a later period during my imprisonment at the Mental Intensive Care Ward at

Brampton Civic Hospital, one of my nurse (Filomena) witness me doing Yoga at about

7:00 A.M. and her reaction was to say;

“Boy you are flexible...”

[242] Another time my other nurse (Joan) said to me at about 7:00 A.M. in the morning

while I was practicing Yoga;

“Sorry to disturb your sun salutation, but I will be your nurse today.”

[243] The Orderlies, Jeff, Ian and Junior witness me practicing Yoga every morning

when they came to take my vitals, blood pressure, oxygen, temperature, and heart rate;

there reactions are similar in kind and in the following format;

“You are in excellent shape, keep up the good work.”


-67-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[244] My medical Doctor (Dr. Siegel), reaction after my examination was;

“You look good.”

[245] Yet the 1st Nurse such a drastic contrasting opinion, she was obviously, very

upset at something or the other. Furthermore, the she asserted or inferred that they

think that I am crazy and that I was violent and threatening people. She did not give

any examples of who I was violent to or whom I had or was threatening; furthermore

she was close enough (about 2 feet), to be in violation of my personal space while

informing me of my violent nature in a very loud voice.

[246] I was only doing my Yoga practice on a blanket on the floor; which in my view was

not a big deal and a much smaller issue than she was making it out to be. Or maybe I

was unknowingly messing up some sort of observation in progress or whatever the case

may be?

[247] I was not aware that a patients doing regular morning Yoga exercises to maintain

good health and well being and reduce stress, could cause this much problems or

induce such a dramatic outcry against a benign action. However, I ignored her and

continue my Yoga practice, I was not about to have my peace and tranquility

sabotaged; In any event I continued to do and complete my Yoga exercises. The early

mornings is the part of the day I most enjoy.


-68-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[248] Furthermore, the 1st Nurse asserted on many occasions that the floor which I was

doing Yoga was filthy!! She continued to ramble on about how disgusting the hospital

floors were, by stating to my person repetitively;

“The floor is filthy! The floor is filthy! The floor is filthy...”

[249] I was not aware that a patients doing regular morning Yoga exercises to maintain

good health and well being and reduce stress, could cause this much problems.

However, I ignored her and continue my Yoga practice, I was not about to have my

peace and tranquility sabotaged; In any event I continued to do and complete my Yoga

exercises. The early mornings is the part of the day I most enjoy.

[250] CASE 1:If it is the case that the floor is indeed so filthy as being inferred by the 1st Nurse , then

this would be an obvious continual violation of the Health and Safety Act; not to mention

a flagrant violation of the of Professional Standard of Reasonable Care owed to a

patient, and a violation of the implied covenant of Duty of Care, not to do harm to your

patient.

[251] CASE 2:Patients/prisoners such as myself, are not allowed to wear their shoes. Patients shoes,

clothes, and personal items are confiscated by WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE,

Brampton Civic Hospital, security officers and locked away. So most of the time at

the initial stage of this process I was walking with bare feet on the so called “filthy floor”,


-69-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

as were many other Patients. I had to beg the said hospital security to keep my socks

as a guard against the cold floor.

[252] CASE 3:I had an open wound on my left little finger and nail as a result of the assault of Officer

Perkins (2261) who drove Cruiser 52. I repetitively begged the emergency staff to stitch

close my open wound from the Friday the 26 th of August 2011, early in the morning to

no avail.

[253] If the 1st Nurse in the ACUTE MENTAL CARE unit, at WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH

CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, care so much or was so concerned about “filthy

floors.” They would have guarded me against the “ filthy floors” by stitching up my open

wound shut, to help guard against infection, when I repetitively requested it to be done.

[254] WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, should have

showed reasonable profession standard of care by protecting my health and well being.

To protect me their patient against, infects, flesh eating bacteria, and antibiotic

resistance bacteria like MRSA.

[255] On Saturday the 27th of August 2011, at or about 7:30 A.M., Dr. Koczerginski

(2nd time), came to engage me in conversation in the Acute Mental Health Unit. I

immediately informed the said Doctors, that I have not spoken to a lawyer to act as my

advocate and advise me.


-70-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[256] Furthermore, I informed Dr. Koczerginski that he was a person in authority and

his words carry great weight in society at large and in the judicial system, so I would not

be having uninformed conversations with him or making uninformed decisions without

my lawyer.

[257] I advised Dr. Koczerginski that they were in violation of my Section 10 and

Section 7. Charter of Rights. Moreover, Article 14 of THE INTERNATIONAL

COVENANT OF CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, demand that a lawyer be provided

and pay for by the state if a citizen cannot pay for one.

[258] This is the minimum legal Rights prescribed by the said covenant, to which the

Federal and Provincial Governments or signatures. I boldly declared, I need my Lawyer

to make informed decisions! And that was the end of the conversation.

[259] On Saturday the 27th of August 2011, at or about 7:30 A.M., after I spoke with

Dr. Koczerginski (2nd time), the 2nd Nurse came to engage me in conversation in the

Acute Mental Health Unit.

[260] The said 2nd Nurse asked if it would be okay to speak with Dr. Koczerginski if she

was present as a witness. I answer the same nurse in the negative, and informed her

that I need my lawyer to make informed decision, and have informed conversations.

She inferred that this was not a requirement of FORM 1..


-71-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[261] Moreover, all the relevant medical staff of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM,

Brampton Civic Hospital, have been advising me that lawyer is not a requirement for

FORM 1.. Later on that morning, the same 2nd Nurse asked me for the location of

FORM 42. I advised the said 2nd Nurse that if she did-not know a lawyer is a

requirement for FORM 1., then why is she asking me for FORM 42.; she obviously

know byway of FORM 42, that a lawyer was a requirement for FORM 1., this was

the first time I saw a FORM 42. and I was able to figure this out. I told the same

nurse that I was no going to reveal its location. FORM 42. states;

“The application is sufficient authority to hold you in custody in this hospital for up to 72 hours.

you have the right to retain and instruct a lawyer without delay.”

[262] MENTAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT:On Saturday the 27th of August 2011, by Dr. Koczerginski, to WILLIAM OSLER

HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, Mental Health Intensive Care Unit. I

was admitted through regular admission and I advised the intake Hospital Staff (3

workers), that I was a political prisoner who is here against my will and I am on hunger

strike until I leave this facility that has me in unjust custody.

[263] Furthermore, I advised the said staff that I was being held in contravention of

Section 10. and Section 7. and I have not been informed of my Rights nor given

access to a lawyer. Therefore, I will not have uninformed conversation with anyone in

authority nor make uninformed decision without my lawyer.


-72-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[264] On the morning of Saturday the 27th of August 2011, Dr. Ohene-Darkoh came to

engage me in conversation for the first time in my room (N.1.121). I informed him that I

will not speak to a person in authority without my lawyer.

[265] Furthermore, I have not been informed of my Rights nor have I been given the

opportunity to obtain council; which would advise me in making informed decisions and

having informed conversations. Moreover, the one responsible for my custody are in

contravention of Section 10. and section 7. of the Charter of Rights.

[266] In addition to the afore said, Article 14 of The International Covenant of Civil and

Political Rights, demands that a lawyer be provided to citizens and be payed for by the

State if the said citizen cannot afford one.

[267] He said I am on a FORM 1., which has never been disclosed to me; it is a

secret document, and as far as I am concerned a phantom document used to

condemn me to unjust and immoral custody without due process or the

application of my Rights being administered to. I told him in a bold voice with clear

and direct language, that I nee my lawyer and that was the end of the conversation.

[268] Day-4 of my custody and self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:On Monday the 29th of August 2011 at or about 4:30 P.M. , Dr. Koczerginski came to

to engage me in conversation in my room(N.1.121) for the third time. I informed Dr.

Koczerginski for the second time, that I will not be speaking to him a person in authority


-73-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

until I have a Lawyer present, so that I may make informed decisions and participate in

informed discussions. I affirmed in a strong and direct voice that I need my lawyer.

[269] Dr. Koczerginski , left my room and came back a short time later and advised me

that he has put me on a FORM 3, so that I may have a lawyer and a Rights councilor

would attend later to speak to me. He also left me a certified copy of a FORM 30.

Which states as follows;

“This is to inform you that you are being detained under the authority of a Certificate of involuntary Admission (FORM 3)...

I completed this certificate on Aug 29, 2011...

I am of the opinion that

a) you are suffering from mental disorder of a nature or quality that likely will result in,

✓serious physical impairment of you, unless you remain in the custody of a psychiatric facility;

{...}

If you wish to challenge your detention, you have the right to a hearing before the Board. You may apply for a hearing by completing FORM 16(attached).

date: August 29, 2011 signature of... physician: Dr. Koczerginski

After you receive this notice, a person called a “rights adviser” will meet with you to inform you as to your rights and help you in applying for a hearing if that is what you wish to do. You have the right to retain and instruct a lawyer without delay.”

[270] On Monday the 29th of August 2011 at or about 9:30 A.M., I served

Reenie(Nurse in charge or manager), legal documents address to the “Head” of

Brampton Civic Hospital for a requisition of all personal information, assessments,

medical records, and medical screening test byway of he Freedom of Information Act. I


-74-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

asked for the said request to be completed SAP because I was on hunger-strike for the

injustice being done to me. I was promised a copy of the original, since the photocopier

was not working.

[271] On Monday the 29th of August 2011 at or about 6:00 P.M., I saw the Rights

Advisor. She made an application on my behalf to Legal Aid Ontario, for financial

assistance in retaining a lawyer.

[272] Day-5 of my custody and self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner.

On Tuesday morning on the 30th of August 2011, Dr. Koczerginski came to engage

me in conversation in my room (N.1.121) for the forth time. I informed the same Doctor

in clear and direct that the questionable foundation he is basing is premise, assumption

and justification to effect a psychiatric assessment, is mainly based on police brutality,

trauma, police deception and police lying.

[273] Furthermore, I advised Dr. Koczerginski for the third time, that I will not have

uninformed conversation with him; for he is a person in authority and his words carry

great weight in the judicial system and society at large. I boldly stated that I need my

lawyer. This is the third time I have informed the same Doctor of my position in no

uncertain terms.

[274] On Tuesday morning on the 30th of August 2011, at about noon. I called Legal

Aid Ontario at 1 800 668 8258. The legal Aid personal confirmed the receipt of my legal


-75-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

Aid application and asked me to call back on Thursday, 1st September 2011, because

the Application takes about 48 hours.

[275] Day-6 of my custody and self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:On Wednesday morning on the 31st of August 2011, in the morning I called the

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO(C51190) at 416-327-5020 and spoke to

Mary(Appeal scheduling clerk), to adjourned my matter to the earliest available date in

2012, because I was in the hospital and unable to prepare or attend court.

[276] On Wednesday morning on the 31st of August 2011, I called Tanya at the

INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSION. I was transfered to her extension and

got her voice mail. I left a message for Tanya on her sad voice mail, informing her to

adjourn my response in my matter against the Crown concerning Crown disclosure

matter(Sept 5), because I was in the hospital and was unable to give a formal or any

response by Sept 5, 2011.

[277] On Wednesday morning on the 31st of August 2011, I called Legal Aid Ontario

and confirmed that my client number was CLT 141 3162 and my Rights Advisor name

was Pat Brar.

[278] On Wednesday morning on the 31st of August 2011, at about 12:20 P.M., Dr.

Ohene-Dar Koh came to engage me in conversation for the second time in my

room(N.1.121). The said Doctor informed me that he was taking over my care for Dr.

Koczerginski, who is or appear to be his superior.


-76-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[279] He asked some questions and I answered by informing him that the questionable

factual foundation he is basing his premise, his assumptions and justification to do a

psychiatric assessment is faulty. Furthermore, it is bad science.

[280] I asked Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh to articulate, explain and define the following;

i) my mental state ?

ii) my mental illness ?

iii) “serious physical impairment of you...?”

which is the the given reason and justification on FORM30., to hold me in custody and

effect a psychiatric assessment or possible declare me mentally incompetent.

[281] Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh on Wednesday morning on the 31st of August 2011, at

about 12:20 P.M could not in any shape or form, articulate, explain or define in a

meaningful way the aforesaid medical issues and statements.

[282] In short he failed to satisfy my person of any medical issues for holding me in

custody, Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh failed to identify any mental issues or define a mental

state; hence, justification for my custody was wanting and in question. Thus, the

question of unjust custody arbitrary imprisonment within the context of Section

9., Section 10., Section 13 and Section 15. must be explored?


-77-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[283] On Wednesday morning on the 31st of August 2011, at about 12:20 P.M., I

informed Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh;

i)that I do-not hear voices, nor have I ever heard voices, I do-not believe I have special

powers, and I do-not believe that someone his following me;

ii) that the conversation we were having was a violation of Section 10 and Section 7 of

the Charter, because I have not yet been instructed by a lawyer; to enable me to make

informed decisions, give informed answers or have informed discussions with a person

in authority.

[284] I boldly declared in clear direct language, that I need to see my lawyer first before

I can speak to the said Doctor.

[285] On Wednesday morning on the 31st of August 2011, at about 1:00 P.M.,after Dr.

Ohene-Dar Koh; the same Doctor returned a litter later inspire of what I advised him of

and my position on the matter before us. Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh requested of my person

for the first time in clear direct language;

“Wayne! Are you willing to take anti-psychotic Drugs...?”

[286] I replied in the negative and asked him if he was crazy, they were starting to scare

me with such a unjustified request. I know I was being rude, but their is no excuse for

this unreasonable request or silent demand encapsulated in a sort of friendly question.


-78-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[287] On Wednesday morning on the 31st of August 2011, at about 1:00 P.M., Dr.

Ohene-Dar Koh offered me ANTI-PSYCHOTIC DRUGS, shortly after he failed;

i) to define or articulate any psychotic evens, or name any witness to psychotic events,

or even demonstrate a history of psychotic episodes;

ii) to define, articulate or even identify my so-called mental illness or mental state;

iii) to define or articulate,“serious physical impairment of you...?”

which is the the given reason and justification on FORM30., to hold me in custody and

effect a psychiatric assessment or possible declare me mentally incompetent.

[288] This is the scariest thing I have ever experience in the hospital. This is one of the

main reason I am on hunger strike coupled with the strange and questionable

circumstances and events surrounding my unjustified custody. I have over heard

medical staff reasoning to put medication in a patients food because se was refusing

regularly to take her medication.

[289] She was a very difficult patient who stayed in Room (N.1.115) or (N.1.113) with

Maria I believed, but it was more than likely (N.1.115). I have said no to Drugs all my life

and now a Doctor is asking me in no uncertain language;

“Wayne! Would you be willing to take anti-psychotic Drugs!”

For no good reason, without any merits or valid reasons or even a clear and precise

articulation of some form of illness with concrete supporting evidence.


-79-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[290] The WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, and its

medical staff did not even have the common decency to disclose their phantom

documents which they base their decisions and justification on, mainly;

FORM 1., FORM 3., and the elusive POLICE REPORT!

I say no to Drugs Doctor!

I say no to Drugs WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Governing Board!

I say no to Drugs Brampton Civic Hospital!

I say no to Drugs Dr. Koczerginski!!!

I need to see my lawyer !!!!

[291] On Wednesday morning on the 31st of August 2011, at about 2:14 P.M., I served

on the “HEAD” of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, ,

byway of Docie(nurse) and Mrs. Hamilton(nurse in charge) the document titled:

NOTICE OF HARM DONE TO PATIENT:, It should be noted that nurse Docie excepted

the said document from me but but refused to make a copy for my record.

[292] On Wednesday the 31st of August 2011, I served on the “HEAD” of WILLIAM

OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, , byway of Althia (nurse

receptionist), Reennie(nurse in charge), a Requisition for Personal Information and

Medical Information in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act. It should be

noted that that Doreen(the Acting Manager) promised to my person to disclosed to me a

complete photo copy of the said document for my record but has failed to do so.


-80-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[293] Day-7 of my custody and self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:On Thursday morning on the 01st of September 2011, at or about 11:00 A.M., Dr.

Acharyya came to engage me in conversation under the guise and in the capacity of a

Medical Doctor(physical) in my room(N.1. 121).

[294] Dr. Acharyya, did not disclose the full capacity he was acting in, but appeared to

be acting in the capacity of only a medical doctor. The said Doctor was in my opinion

was being deceptive and deceived me into believing he was acting in the capacity of

only a medical Doctor who only looks at physical problems, even though I asked Dr.

Acharyya to disclose his name and spell it.

[295] On Thursday morning on the 01st of September 2011, at or about 6:30 A.M., I

had asked my nurse if I could see a medical Doctor (possible Dr. Siege l), to review my

EKG test, blood test, ad enquire of further testing to detect possible heart conditions

such as a Stress Test.

[296] On Thursday morning on the 01st of September 2011, at or about 11:00 A.M., Dr.

Acharyya came to engage me in uninformed conversation covertly, while acting in the

capacity of a medical Doctor instead of acting in the full capacity as a psychiatric

Doctor. He was in possession of a clipboard which he occasionally checked off, take

notes or whatever the case may be.


-81-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[297] Dr. Acharyya engage me in uninformed conversation covertly without disclosing

his intension or objective on issues which a solely medical Doctor would not be

interested or qualified to engage me in.

[298] When Dr. Acharyya , a psychiatrist by profession was confronted with the status

of his professional tittle, he said that he was a psychiatrist and a medical doctor and it is

written on his ID TAG; which I cannot read because I don’t have nor can afford

corrective lenses.

[299] When I realized that Dr. Acharyya , was a psychiatrist and not solely a medical

Doctor, which is the capacity he was acting in covertly. I boldly informed him in clear

and direct language, that he deceived me and he was being deceptive and not

forthcoming about his full capacity or capacity he was acting in. I clearly and directly

asserted to the said Doctor;

“You deceived me sir!”

[300] We began talking about EKG, Stress-Test for the heart, damage to left hand and

damage to throat before the conversation was led by the said Doctor into the realm of

psychiatric assessment.

[301] I strongly informed Dr. Acharyya , a psychiatrist by profession, that I need to see

my lawyer before I could speak to him and the medical staff at WILLIAM OSLER


-82-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, who were all aware of this byway of the

information in my file.

[302] Furthermore, I informed him in clear and precise language, that he was violating

my Section 10. and Section 7. Rights of the Supreme Law of Canada.

[303] I asserted to Dr. Acharyya, that I cannot have uninformed conversation with a

person in authority before I speak to my lawyer. I need my Lawyer and not to be

harassed by psychiatrist.

[304] I felt violated, like I am being mentally raped! No means no! I immediately

informed my nurse(Docie) that I need a medical Doctor solely, to check out my

heart, EKG, blood-test and apply any further test needed, and not a psychiatrist. I

need due process in the application of my Rights.

[305] Day-8 of my custody and self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:On Friday morning on the 02nd of September 2011, at or about 6:30 A.M.,I put in a

request with my nurse to see a medical doctor about the ever present pain I have been

feeling in the left side of my throat since the 26th of August 2011.

[306] On Friday morning on the 02nd of September 2011, Dr. Siegel came to see me

with a rather large flashlight in stead of the normal bright medical pen light I am so

accustom to seeing medical doctors use for diagnosis. At a later date I saw the

Orderly(Jeff), using the same or what appeared to be the same flashlight.


-83-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[307] Dr. Siegel after examining my throat, said that it was red and that their was a

possible viral infection, but the infection did-not require any antibiotics.

[308] I asked Dr. Siegel if a Drug screening test was done on the two vile of blood taken

from me on the 26th of August 2011. He confirmed that a drug screening test was done

on my said blood samples by answering in the affirmative.

[309] On Friday morning on the 02nd of September 2011, at about 12:20 P.M., Dr.

Acharyya came to see me while I was in the TV Room. He informed me that a letter

from my lawyer was in my file. I also reminded him that I could not speak to him until I

spoke to my lawyer first. It should be noted that a copy of the said lawyers letter has

never been disclosed to me, I have never seen a copy of it and I have never spoken to

my lawyer personally on the phone or in person.

[310] On Friday the 02nd of September 2011, I called the Ontario OMBUDSMAN, to file

a complaint on injustice done to me by the law on enforcement and the lack of due

process and the lack of an application of my rights in processing me for allege

infractions. Furthermore, for the strange irregularities in the application of medical and

psychiatric process or procedure at the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE,

Brampton Civic Hospital; I was being subjected to faulty psychological practices and

questionable medical science in my humble opinion.


-84-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[311] On Friday the 02nd of September 2011, I called the COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS

SURGEONS OF ONTARIO, to file a complaint to file a complaint against Doctors at the

WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital; I was Told the said

complaint must be formal and in writing.

[312] On Friday the 02nd of September 2011, my so called lawyer’s assistance or

lawyer’s secretary or whatever the case may be, called to inform me that my lawyer’s

name is D’arcy Hiltz with 35 years experience.

[313] The said assistance informed me that Mr./Ms. D’arcy Hiltz tried to meet with the

Appeal Tribunal on Friday the 02nd of September 2011, but it was not possible for the

to the Tribunal to meet on the said date. She asked me if next Wednesday or Thursday

was a good date to go before the Appeal Tribunal, since those were the viable dates for

Mr./Ms. D’arcy Hiltz who had other legal commitments. I answered in the affirmative

and concur with the earliest day possible and chosen by Legal Councilor D’arcy Hiltz.

[314] It should be noted that I have never seen, spoken to, shook his/her hand or even

sent a letter from my so called lawyer. In fact, I am unaware if my lawyer is male or

female nor is it possible to contact him/her form the MENTAL INTENSIVE HEALTH

ward from the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital.


-85-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[315] Since, there was no access to a phone other than a Bell Pay Phone in the lunch

room. Isolation from the outside world is enforced quite effectively by the said medical

institution.

[316] On Friday the 02nd of September 2011, while I was in the TV Room, I saw Ms.

Pat Brar in the hallway; she had promised me on more than one occasion to disclose to

me a copy of the LEGAL AID LAWYERS LIST, she failed to fulfill her promise even

thought she had many chances byway of her personal attendance in the Hospital.

[317] I personally saw her on more than two occasion. So I am still without a list of

viable LEGAL AID LAWYERS and I am unable to check and confirm if Mr./Ms. D’arcy

Hiltz is on the said list or to compare the same lawyer with other qualified and viable

legal aid lawyers to make informed choices.

[318] On Saturday the 27th of August 2011, at or about 8:00 A.M. I was admitted to the

MENTAL HEALTH INTENSIVE CARE WARD, and placed in custody in Room (N.1.121)

by the inherent professional authority of Dr. Koczerginski whom has 30 years

experience in the psychiatric field.

[319] The intake was done by three medical personnel. The MENTAL HEALTH

INTENSIVE CARE WARD is located in the North building on the first floor; hence, each

room in the mental intensive care ward start with the delineation N.1. then a number. I

believe or I have deduced that N is for north and 1 is for the first floor.


-86-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[320] The MENTAL HEALTH INTENSIVE CARE WARD, is in the general shape of a

U with a nicely concealed dividing barrier concealed by rooms straight down the middle

of the said ward U shape. On either side of this said dividing barrier in the middle of the

U, is two sets of adjacent security doors which require a security card to enter or leave

the mental intensive care unit. The security doors can also be opened from the nurses

station.

[321] I f we label the top of the ‘U’ as the top of the MENTAL HEALH INTENSIVE

CARE WARD, and the bottom of the U as the bottom of the MENTAL HEALTH

INTENSIVE CARE WARD; then the left side is known as the know as INTENSIVE

CARE and the right side is known as MORE INTENSIVE CARE for lack of better words.

The MORE INTENSIVE CARE side is located on the right side of the U and this is were

all the endless screams, loud banging, foul language, and some patients are locked up

in their Rooms. The MORE INTENSIVE CARE side is also sometimes known as the

OTHER SIDE.

[322] The left side of the U (ward or unit), which is known as INTENSIVE CARE, is

where I was placed into custody on the left side of the MENTAL HEALH INTENSIVE

CARE WARD, in the INTENSIVE CARE SIDE, at the bottom of the U.

[323] If one was to enter the MENTAL HEALH INTENSIVE CARE WARD, on the

INTENSIVE CARE SIDE (left side of U), through the security doors or exit(top of the U),


-87-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

to the immediately right after entering the unit would be the first room, which is a co-

head shower. There are two showers on the left hand side, this one is the smaller of the

two.

[324] The next room would be ROOM N.1.113, which is Maria’s and Christina’s room.

The room number delineation had a paper cut out heart above it. Then the next room

would be ROOM N.1.115. Both rooms N.1.113 and N.1.115 are double rooms with

there own bathrooms.

[325] The next room would be ISOLATION ROOM N.1.117, which is Brant’s room. The

next room is ISOLATION ROOM N.1.119, is connected to Brant’s room, N.1.117 by

way of an inner door. I am unaware wether ISOLATION ROOM N.1.119 is a patients

room or a decontamination room for entering and leaving ISOLATION ROOM

N.1.117( Brant’s room). ROOM N.1.117 has it own bath room and had a warning sign

on the door which states as follows;

“CONTACT PRECAUTIONSVisitors Report to Nursing Station before entering Room

PICTURE OF GOWN PICTURE OF GLOVESFOR ALL PERSONS ENTERING ROOM

Wash our Hands Before and After Patient Contact”

ISOLATION ROOM N.1.117( Brant’s room), is located directly across from the nurses

station.


-88-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[326] The next room is my room, ROOM N.1.121 and it is located at the bottom of the

U and to the right side. The room has two very large windows overlooking the

EMERGENCY UNIT and beyond of the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM,

Brampton Civic Hospital.

[327] One can see the endless train of ambulances and police officers vehicles

entering and leaving the Hospital. The officers, paramedic, and hospital medical staff

can be clearly seen and observed. But, one must remember that the windows are

regular and observation is a two way traffic.

[328] I never asked for the blinds to be shut, since the view of the outside world, the

surroundings, and the sunlight entering the room had much more value than privacy.

The sunrise are beautiful, at least the way I imagined them to be and it is a blessing not

to have all that window real-estate wasted by facing a wall.

[329] The next room at the bottom of the U is a co-ed washroom. The next room to that

room is ROOM N.1.123 and the next room to that room is ROOM N.1.125. Then you

have the dividing wall incorporated in rooms, straight down the middle of the U. The

said dividing wall inter sects the nurses station and continue onwards to the top of the U

while being hidden by adjacent rooms or being incorporated in adjacent rooms.

[330] The Nurses station is an elongated rectangular prism, which protrudes from either

side of the barrier down the middle of the U. Between the nurses station and ROOM


-89-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

N.1.125 is a sets of adjacent security doors which require a security card to move

between either side of the U or more accurately move between “INTENSIVE CARE”

side of the MENTAL HEALH INTENSIVE CARE WARD and the “MORE INTENSIVE”

CARE side of the same unit or the “OTHER SIDE” which it is sometime refereed to as.

[331] I one was to travel up the demarkation from the bottom of the U to the top of the

U, you would have the following rooms; N.1.125, NURSES STATION, LUNCH ROOM

with Bell Phone, CO-ED SHOWER (larger of the two), hallway with locked security door

to linen and the OTHER SIDE, TV ROOM, and then exit through adjacent security

doors.

[332] Directly in-front of my room(N.1. 121) and located in the ceiling of the hallway in

the “INTENSIVE CARE” side of the MENTAL HEALH INTENSIVE CARE WARD, are

security cameras. Similarly, slightly to the right of my room(N.1. 121) and located

in the ceiling of the hallway are more security cameras. Both sets of security

cameras are housed in transparent half black globes in stalled in the ceiling.

[333] These are the only place cameras are in stalled in the hallway of the

“INTENSIVE CARE”, as far as I am aware of, but I could be wrong? It should be noted

that all the patients room, washrooms, and showers are heavy strong doors which can

be locked from the outside, but can never be locked from the inside. Thus anyone can

walk in on you at anytime, even if you are in the washroom on the toilet or in the

showers. It happen to me a few times. Moreover, a patient’s room can be instantly


-90-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

turned into a jail cell and locked from the outside. I kept my door wide open 90% of the

time.

[334] So much for the Rights to Privacy or whatever they may call it these days. In

addition the doors to the room are extra heavy and strong with the two adjacent glass

windows in the doors being composed of a type of reinforced glass that has metal mesh

sandwiched in the meddle.

[335] MRSA:There is a patient two doors to the left of me in Isolation Room N.1.117, whose name I

reasonable belief to be “Brant”. Brant has been possibly exposed to MRSA, an

antibiotic resistance bacteria. Brant shared a room upstairs(possible 6 th floor),

with a person who has been determined to be infected with MRSA or tested

positive for MRSA or been exposed to MRSA or whatever the case may be. The

aforesaid person was Brant’s pass roommate before the Hospital found out that his

injuries was caused by an attempt to commit suicide.

[336] The important issue is Brant, a patient who has possible been exposed to MRSA

and is deemed to be in isolation by the caution sign on is door (N.1.117) to all medical

staff and his visitors; moreover, their is an isolation delineation along with Brant’s Room

number (Isolation N.1.117), was out all morning and all day on the 2nd of september

2011, even though he was not dully declared by the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH

CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, relevant medical staff to be free of any MRSA


-91-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

contamination. Brant, in addition to spending the morning and day outside, spent time in

the lunch room while using the phone or finish eating his lunch.

[337] In the evening on the same day, Brant’s nurse(Janie) came in to the TV room and

asked him to go back to his isolation room. Since, I was in close proximity to nurse

Janie and Brant on the sofa adjacent to the one they were sitting and talking in, I

overheard her inform Brant that his MRSA test were not completed and he must go

back to his isolation room. Brant replied by saying;

“please don’t do that to me.”

[338] Nurse Janie countered by informing him that she allowed him to be out all day

already and his test related to MRSA exposer has not been completed or something to

that effect.

[339] Recall, Brant was out all morning and all day. I had long conversations with him,

sat in the same chair and used the same TV converter after he used it. I even handed

him his lunch while he was getting in his wheel chair and wipe up the water e left on the

arm of the said chair after he left to finish his lunch in the lunch room.

[340] Brant disclosed to me how his ex-wife and daughter was suppose to visit him on

the said day and how he was going to move in with his parents after he left Brampton

Civic Hospital.


-92-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[341] Brant even told me how he tried unsuccessfully to commit suicide by jumping off a

40 to 50 feet bridge; breaking breaking his legs or thigh and shattering the bones in his

face. He also revealed that he has a long metal rod holding the broken bone of his right

thigh together. The resulting open wound from the operation had to be closed with an

accumulated length of about 18 inches of staples to his right thigh.

[342] According to Brant, his face had about 3 medal plates holding the shattered bones

together. He would repetitively ask the medical staff for ice to sooth the pain in his face.

[343] I don’t know how much damage was done to his left leg, but, he removed his

removable cast after asking permission to do so and for which I answered in the

affirmative.

[344] He said that after he jumped and did all his physical damage, he crawled between

two bridges; so when he was admitted to the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE,

Brampton Civic Hospital, quite possible on the sixth floor, no one knew he had tried to

end his life.

[345] It was not until his ex-wife, “ratted him out”, as he puts it or made the Hospital

aware of his attempted suicide, that the hospital transfered him to the MENTAL

INTENSIVE CARE UNIT and assigned him to Room N.!.117 for a mental illness or

mental state of depression and being suicidal.


-93-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[346] Brant, informed me that he is constantly in unbearable pain, for which has been

taking up to 12 pills a day(additive pain killer). He said they were additive, but the

Hospital was trying to cut him down to 6 pain killers per day.

[347] On Friday evening of the 2nd of September 2011, Brant left his isolation room

(Room N.1. 117) covertly and went to the lunch room to use the phone and was using

the regularly used Bell phone, which all patients use.

[348] This was after his nurse(Janie) returned him back to his room and confined him

there until an all clear from the relevant authority of the Hospital. I promptly informed the

orderly, to inform his nurse(Janie), that Brant of isolation room N.1.117, was suppose to

be in isolation.

[349] In addition to having a sore throat, my left little finger and upper part of left nail

has open wounds which the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic

Hospital, medical staff has refused to stitch close from the 26th of August 2011.

[350] Furthermore, the open wound in the left side of my throat which I reasonable

believe was caused when Police Officers pulled me up by the back of my shirt thereby

chocking me with the collar and also grabbing me by the neck with a bare hand. Their is

a 3 to 4 inch scar on the lower part of my neck to show for this use of force action.


-94-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[351] The point is, I have open wounds the antibiotic resistant bacteria (MRSA) could

enter my body and proliferate. I was possible being unnecessarily and negligently

exposed to MRSA. Is the unknown risk I am being exposed to fair to me and the other

patient? Is the aforesaid action in accordance with the professional standard of

reasonable care?

[352] Brant’s young daughter (about 16 or so), along with her friend came too visit him

and his daughter and her friend had to conduct themselves in accordance with the

policy and procedure the hospital has laid down. They washed before entering Brant’s

room(N.1.117) and the washed after leaving the room. I am unaware of other

precautions which might have been taken.

“CONTACT PRECAUTIONSVisitors Report to Nursing Station before entering Room

{PICTURE OF GOWN} {PICTURE OF GLOVES}FOR ALL PERSONS ENTERING ROOM

Wash our Hands Before and After Patient Contact”

[353] FOOD TO SUSTAIN ME IN MY BOYCOTT OF THE HOSPITAL FOOD:Day-8 of my custody and self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner.

On Friday the 02nd of September 2011, at or about 7:30 P.M., my cousin came to visit

me and bring me some simple foods. She immediately noticed a long scar on my neck

healing or at the final stages of the healing process on the left lower part of my neck.

[354] I have been in the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic

Hospital, for eight days, begging for the staff to attend to my wounds caused by the


-95-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

Peel Regional Police and all the personnel from the medical staff at the said medical

institution iI came in contact with, failed to point out my injury on the left side of my neck,

even though I have been constantly complaining of pain in the left side of my throat

where the Officer grabbed me by the throat.

[355] Is this a professional standard of reasonable care? It should be noted that the

light in the washroom was dull and dying and didn't provide sufficient illumination to see

the damage to my neck. The washroom is the only place a mirror exist for me to see my

reflection.

[356] Day-9 of my custody and self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:On Saturday the 03rd of September 2011, at or about 2:00 P.M., Dr. Noorani came to

engage me in conversation in my room (N.1.121), in the capacity of a psychiatrist. He

asked me if I was okay? I responded by asking him if he he had read my file? He

answered in the negative. So I informed him that I cannot have uninformed conversation

with him, and I must speak to my lawyer before speaking to him. He indicated that he

understand and left to see other patients.

[357] Day-10 of my custody/self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:

On Sunday on the 04th of September 2011, at or about 8:00 P.M.. My throat is still sore

and my left finger and nail is still healing. Brant, is still in isolation. Brant still occupies

room N.1. 117 with a warning or caution sign on it.


-96-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[358] Day-11 of my custody and self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:On Monday the 05th of September 2011, at or about 1:00 P.M., Brant was brought out

of his room with a bright yellow mask o in his wheel chair. I don’t know if he has been

cleared to leave his room. I don’t know if he is still in isolation for possible MRSA

exposer.

[359] What I know is that the warning or caution sign is still on his door, the isolation

delineation along with his room number (N.1. 117) is still there.

[360] A little later on the same day, I saw Brant without the bright yellow mask and his

escort, go to the TV room and proceeded to watch TV.

[361] On Monday the 05th of September 2011, at or about 2:30 P.M., I went to the

nurses office to ask and inquire if Brant in isolation room(N.1. 117), and with the

warning or caution sign on his door has been cleared for MRSA contamination?

[362] The personnel in the nurses office responded in the affirmative. However, I

advised the said medical staff in the nurses office that the warning or caution sign on

isolation room(N.1.117) is still on the door.

[363] The said personnel in the nurses office could not articulate the reason why the

warning or caution sign was still on Brant’s door, if it is indeed the case that he has

been cleared for MSRA exposer. I informed the said medical staff that it is a


-97-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

contradiction for Brant in room N.1.117 to be cleared for MRSA contamination and yet

his door still has a Warning or caution sign on it.

[364] I decided not to use the TV room for obvious reasons. My health and well being is

much more important than access to a TV or a common room. Brant being cleared for

possible MRSA exposer and still having a caution or warning sign for entering his room

or have contact with him, does not make logical sense to me.

[365] There is an unresolved contradiction. It is better to be safe than sorry. Therefore,

I will confine myself to my room except for when I need to take a shower or use the bath

room.

[366] The first time Brant was out of is isolation room without being cleared, it was

nurse (Janie) who had allowed him to leave the isolation room and possible risk to the

well being of the other patients and Hospital Staff. I feel empathy for Brant’s isolated in

a room, the hospital should probable provide a TV for him, but the health and well being

of the hospital staff and the other patients should have first priority.

[367] On Monday the 05th of September 2011, at or about 6:00 P.M., Dr. Brida I

reasonable believe and because my nurse advised me that this was the Doctor who

visited me on the same date; came to my room N.1.121 to engage me in conversation

concerning when my lawyer is coming and if I was eating and so forth.


-98-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[368] On Monday the 05th of September 2011, shortly after 6:00 P.M., and after Dr.

Brida had finished visiting me, my nurse came to my room N.1.121 to engage me in

uninformed conversation. She asked me if their was any thing I would like to speak to

her about? I Responded in the negative. She asked if she could asked some standard

questions.

[369] The said Nurse asked me if I heard voices when I sleep or if I have thoughts of

harming myself. These said psychological questions that is asked by all most every one,

except the orderlies and security guards are thrown at you like carpet bombs on a

repetitive basis.

[370] I have answered these same psychological question many many times already. I

have serve on WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, more

than one written articulated document containing short answers to these same said

questions.

[371] Moreover, the capacity which my nurse is acting in is questionable. Is she my

psychiatrist or is she my nurse? I have not spoken to my lawyer yet nor have I been

given the opportunity to participate in a fair and equitable Hearing before an Impartial

Tribunal, so this is just harassment! Plain and simple.

[372] It should be noted that the alarm and announcements are always on the internal

communication system and medical staff can come into and leave your room at will and


-99-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

everyone can hear the constant opening and closing of the heavy noisy security door. In

addition you are always offered something to help you sleep, I ofcourse don’t have

problems sleeping; I can sleep in any environment because this is how I have trained

myself from a young age. When I need to sleep, I sleep.

[373] I have always say no to drugs in any shape or form. Just because it is approved

by the Government does not make it right. Drugs is a foreign chemical or material in the

body the may provide an immediate false solution and carries along with it other

problems. Drugs is always the absolute last resort for me when there is absolutely no

other alternative solution.

[374] I live clean and healthy, I try not to abuse the health care system. This is why my

attendance in the hospitals is minimal, at lease until this enforced custody and

imprisonment with no reasonable justification or sound legal basis.

[375] I have waited patiently for my lawyer to engage me in conversation and to

engage the Appeal Tribunal with respect to the merits of FORM 3.; the WILLIAM

OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, and its medical staff should

also be able to wait patiently for the Appeal Tribunal’s Hearing and subsequent Ruling,

after all I am the one in custody and being denied his life, liberty, security and pursuit of

happiness while being defamed.


-100-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[376] The said engagement of my person and the bombardment with WILLIAM OSLER

HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, medical staff insistent and forcefulness

in engaging me in uninformed conversation and covert psychiatric assessment even

though I am trying to challenge the merits to there justification of my custody and

justification for the aforesaid medical procedure.

[377] It is as though there is a want or a need for me to have a preordained,

undisclosed, unjustified, and unarticulated psychological mental state; they are pushing

with overwhelming force as-though though the aforesaid is “the best thing since slice

bread”.

[378] I choose to wait patiently for the Appeal Tribunal’s fair Hearing on the matter of

mental illness, mental state, and the merits of the legal, medical, and moral justification

of FORM1.. In short, I need the Appeal Tribunal’s fair hearing and adjudication on the

matter of mental illness or lack thereof?

[379] The WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, must also

wait patiently on the appeal hearing and adjudication of the Appeal Tribunal and stop

harassing me.

[380] Day-12 of my custody/self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:On Tuesday the 06th of September 2011, at or about 7:30 A.M.. The warning or caution

sign on isolation room N.1.117, two door away from me on the left hand-side, was

removed. To say again, the warning or caution sign on Brant’s door was removed.


-101-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

However, Brant spent the afternoon and evening outside yesterday mainly in the TV

room.

[381] It is very good news that he has been cleared of MRSA contamination, and it is

very good news for the rest of us, in light of all the brazen violation of what was

supposed to be a responsible isolation of Brant in room N.1. 117 for possible exposer to

MRSA. I guess I don’t have to concern myself with the said irresponsible violation

anymore.

[382] FORM 5./APPEAL HEARING CANCELED/FORM 3. CANCELLED:On Tuesday the 06th of September 2011, at or about 9:00 A.M., Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh

came to my room(N.1 121) to engage me in conversation. I asked DR. Ohene-Dar Koh

if he checked his scientific instruments. Furthermore, I advised him that he is a scientist,

and it was good practice or good science for scientist to check their instruments for

soundness and to calibrate them for accuracy.

[383] I inquire of Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh, if anyone checked the Officer for soundness or

mental illness. For in essence, they are acting as the said Doctors conductor diagnostic

instruments, which his assumptions, justification and science is being based on.

[384] Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh on Tuesday the 06th of September 2011, at or about 9:00

A.M., that he was canceling FORM 3, because he did not observe any bizarre behavior,

and putting me on a FORM 5. I say again Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh asserted that;


-102-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

“I am canceling FORM 3 and putting you on FORM 5, because I have not observe any bizarre behavior...”

[385] FORM 5. states as follows;

“I, Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh the undersigned attending physician, hereby terminate the involuntary status of Wayne Ferron BRAMPTON CIVIC HOSPITAL who shall now be continue as an informal or voluntary patient. I last examined the patient on 6 Sep 2011. The decision to terminate the involuntary status of the patient is based on the following factors:

“No evidence of risk of physical impairment or overt psychosis”

Date 6 Sep 2011”

[386] GUEST PRISONER:I advised the doctor if he put me on FORM 5. he would be conceding to my position and

I have not yet spoken to my Lawyer and the Appeal Tribunal’s Hearing is on

Wednesday or Thursday. Moreover, Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh, said that I can sign papers to

be released or I can stay on a voluntary basis. The RELEASE FROM HOSPITAL form

the said Doctor was speaking about says the following;

“I am removing ......................................., from hospital on my volition, even though it is against the advice and direction of my physician(s), and/or staff of William Osler Health Centre.In making this decision, I hereby release the Hospital, its staff and my attending physician(s) from all claims of any nature that my result as a consequence of this decision...”

[387] CASE 1:Dr. Koczerginski with 30 years experience and was the one who admit me on FORM 1

on Aug 26, 2011, then placed me on FORM 3. on Aug 29, 2011. It is Dr. Koczerginski

prudent professional opinion and medical determination that I am challenging in the

Appeal before the Tribunal, and I am not altogether sure if Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh who


-103-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

appears to be his subordinate can override his medical determination and decision

which is based on 30 years of professional experience.

[388] CASE 2:I was unlawfully(S. 15 violation) arrested for resisting arrest, because I was seeking the

ends of justice as prescribed by the Criminal Code of Canada. It seems that justice was

on holiday on Aug 26, 2011, so I was not allowed to file an information in accordance

with Section 504. of the Criminal Code of Canada, and place it before a Justice of the

Peace while swearing an oath of reasonable belief on the allegations within the said

information as prescribed by parliamentary legislation. The aforementioned was needed

to set the wheels of justice into motion, so that the information can find process.

[389] I was subsequently brought under custody or under the carriage and control of

WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, in handcuffs to

circumvent my legal, civil, and political Rights which are guarantee in a fair hearing,

before an impartial Tribunal, and with in a court of competent jurisdiction.

[390] My Rights and Freedoms which are insured by the Charter was bypassed or

nullified or ignored or whatever the case may be; in order to place me in custody for 72

hours under FORM 1., then under FORM 3. (up to two weeks) with no justification or

reasonable merits and against my will and without my permission or signature.

[391] I gave WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, and Dr.

Koczerginski no permission in any format to be place into custody and for the aforesaid


-104-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

to have carriage and control over me. For Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh to now assert that I am

staying voluntary is ludicrous! I am a prisoner in custody, and I have always been a

prisoner in custody for this whole occurrence.

[392] Given that my so called involuntary status is being terminated by Dr. Ohene-Dar

Koh, whose apparent superior Dr. Koczerginski and his professional medical appraisal

which is responsible for me being unjustly placed in custody. I am imprisoned.

[393] Then why does my release from custody at WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH

SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, MENTAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT, carries a

mandatory condition for release (according to Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh), which release the

said Hospital and its staff from all liabilities?

[394] It is a oxymoron to concatenate voluntary stay with mandatory conditions for

leaving or being discharged from custody and the carriage and control of WILLIAM

OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, MENTAL INTENSIVE CARE

UNIT, and its relevant medical staff. This is a contradiction and an insult to my

intelligence and it reminds me of “Saddam Hussein’s American Guests” during the gulf

war.

[395] Freedom has no conditions, freewill has no conditions, and to volunteer ones self

freely has no conditions. I am being held against my will in custody, in the MENTAL

INTENSIVE CARE UNIT IN Room N.1. 121, in the Brampton Civic Hospital, under the


-105-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

umbrella organization of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic

Hospital, as a political prisoner.

[396] This is a shameless attempt to trick or force me into releasing or relieving

WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, and its relevant staff

of Doctors from liability for actionable wrongs. Furthermore, this said attempt to avoid

or escape liability is the men’s rea part of a crime which has and is being committed.

[397] ACCESS TO PHONE/ACCESS TO JUSTICE/OR SYSTEMIC RACISM:On Tuesday the 6th of September 2011, at some unspecified time in the afternoon, I

called LEGAL AID ONTARIO to make a legal aid application with respect to the SOCIAL

BENEFIT TRIBUNAL APPEAL HEARING, which I have pending on November 30,

2011.

[398] Legal Aid Ontario Informed me that I would have to speak to a specialist, and that

I would have to wait a long time. LEGAL AID ONTARIO, did not say how long I would

have to wait.

[399] I concede that I was waiting on the phone for a long time. However, this is the

only way or method the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic

Hospital, and its medical staff allows me to conduct essential business or necessary

things needed to return my life back to normalcy.


-106-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[400] Mrs Janie (Brant’s and Chris’s nurse) said in clear distinct language to my person

after I advised her of whom I was on hold for and for what reasons;

“I don’t care what you are on the phone for!”

[401] Inferring that I should get off the phone because there or other people waiting to

use it. It is the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, policy

to treat each other with respect.

[402] It should be noted that I allowed nurse Janie to listen on the phone to establish

that LEGAL AID ONTARIO, did indeed have me on hold.

[403] Like I said, this was an extremely important application to LEGAL AID ONTARIO,

which I informed Nurse Janie and her superior Mrs. Hamilton, the nurse in charge.

[404] It should be noted that I am A Black patient or African Canadian patient or

whatever I am to be labeled. Contrastly, Mrs Hamilton(nurse in-charge) is Caucasian,

Nurse Janie is Caucasian, and the other patients waiting for the phone was all

Caucasian.

[405] TAKE NOTICE: The is another Bell pay-phone located in the other lunch room on

the other side of the U or “MORE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT”, which was not checked if it

was being used before openly kicking me off the phone without any regard for the

importance of my Legal Aid Application, while impeding me or denying me the right to


-107-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

make a LEGAL AID APPLICATION for the pending November, 3o, 2011, Social Benefit

Tribunal Hearing.

[406] There is also a curtesy phone which was not in use or checked for being in use.

Patient use the curtesy phone all the time, me included. I used the same curtsy phone

the night before to receive a call, so I know it is fully functional. I try not to abuse the

privilege, so if I have a 1800-tole free number I use the Bell pay phone.

[407] Because LEGAL AID ONTARIO HAS A 1-800 tole free number and the wait time

and time required ti make a legal Aid Application, I chose to use the pay phone, so I

would not need to tie up the curtesy phone.

[408] On Tuesday the 6th of September 2011, at or about 2:00 P.M., without checking

the availability or status of the other Bell pay phone or the Curtesy phone Nurse Janie,

whom articulated;

“I don’t care what you are on the phone for,”

and Mrs. Hamilton (nurse in charge), concluded that I, Wayne Ferron must relinquish

the phone in question immediately without the completion of my LEGAL AID

BUSINESS; which I promptly did at the said nurses insistences, because I Wayne

Ferron is under their carriage and control vicariously through the custody affirmed by Dr.

Koczerginski on Aug 29, 2011 on a FORM 3.; thereby losing the opportunity and

wasting time to make my legal Aid Application for the SOCIAL BENEFIT TRIBUNAL.


-108-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[409] On Tuesday the 6th of September 2011, at or about 2:30 P.M., I asked for a copy

of the legal papers, WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital,

and its relevant medical staff demand that I sign in order to be released from custody.

Remember that I am a prisoner, I am in custody against my will and there is to be a fair

and equitable Appeal Hearing before an Impartial Tribunal to determine the merits of my

custody and reasonable justification for a psychiatric assessment pending.

[410] Day-12 of my custody/self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:Maria from room N.1. 113 came by to give me $0.05 for penances while I was was

writing this. On many occasions, she and I have spoken about her wanting to visit

Sarah(her youngest daughter), her Church, and her Priest who is no longer at her

Church before being admitted to the Mental Intensive Care unit at Brampton Civic

Hospital.

[411] She often times ask me to phone her daughter for her and she constantly

sequentially goes through her memory; it is as though she knows she knows her

memory is degrading so she is constantly checking it and affirming it. She is always one

day behind the societies general excepted date; sometime two day behind the standard

date, but mostly one day.

[412] I can,t understand why she could not resolve her three important issues before

being placed in a the mental intensive care unit. She requested a hug from me when I

was leaving; I hugged her , wish her well and said goodbye. She is a retired nurse and

only desire the comfort and love of her family as she slowLy loses full functionality and


-109-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

independence. As a society, we are collectively committing a crime when we actively

prevent a member of our community who has served use so honourable from enjoying

their retirement years or last years or whatever the case maybe.

[413] She was one of the person waiting for the phone. She usually gives money when

she believes she has committed a sin. I have witnessed her doing it on many occasions.

Her religious affiliation, I reasonable believe is Roman Catholic.

[414] She probable recognized that an injustice has been done against me, so she

gave me $0.05 for penances and said she was sorry. I ofcourse don’t blame her or bear

any ill feelings towards such a sweet Italian lady. It is the principle of the matter which I

am concern with. I accepted her noble gift and reassured her that all was well between

use.

[415] UNREASONABLE THREAT/OR SYSTEMIC RACISM:Tuesday the 06th of September 2011.

About one week earlier on Wednesday the 31st of August 2011, at about 9:00 A:M;

I politely requested from the nurse receptionist who is located in the nurses station at

the section directly across form room N.1.117, for pen and some paper to construct a

legal document for my Rights Advisor. She replayed by stating in boldly in a slightly

elevated voice;

“get this guy away from me! Who is your nurse?”


-110-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[416] I moved to the adjacent side of the nurses station that is perpendicular to room

N.1.125 and requested from my nurse a pen and some paper to construct a legal

document (consignment), for my so called Rights Counselor (Pat Brar). While I was

being given 1/2(half) a sheet of copy paper like a kindergarden child and a very small

pencil, I advised the staff that the requested pen and paper was need to construct a

legal document, and is not possible in pencil for obvious reasons.

[417] I was denied a pen! I asked my nurse why I was refused a pen; Mrs Hamilton

(nurse in charge) informed me in clear precise direct language that it was against the

policy of the Hospital. I countered by politely requesting in clear precise direct language,

to disclose a copy of the said policy which states that patients are not allowed to have

pens, to my person. She responded boldly with a shameless slighter higher and

directed elevated voice;

“The policy is not for you!” or “The policy is not for your eyes.”

[418] I politely asked Mrs. Hamilton in a soft calm clear and direct voice to disclose her

name and spell it. She disclosed her name, but refused to spell it a second time. Since

Mrs. Hamilton, the nurse in-charge refused to disclose the Hospital Official Documented

Policy on pens; I decided to test the fairness of the process a little, so I politely asked

Mrs. Hamilton if I may leave to purchase pen and paper. The was no answer from the

nurse in-charge, instead she commanded me to go back to my room before she put me

in the “MORE INTENSIVE CARE” section of the MENTAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT.


-111-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[419] On Wednesday the 31st of August 2011, at about 9:00 A:M; while I was across

the hall from room N.1.125 and at the nurses station, recording notes of the occurrence

to insure I got the facts accurate. Mrs. Hamilton instructed me in clear and directed

language, to leave, depart, get out of here or something to that effect or else she would

have me placed on the “OTHER SIDE.”

[420] Whatever place me on the “OTHER SIDE” may mean? As for as I am concern,

the aforesaid was a threat which runs contrary to Section 264.1 of the Criminal Code of

Canada without legal, moral, or reasonable medical professional justification.

[421] Furthermore, it is against the policy of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM,

Brampton Civic Hospital, which is clearly posted in the lunch room and states;

************** hospital policy ****************


-112-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[422] I Wayne Ferron, reasonable believe that the “OTHER SIDE” is the right part of

the U, the “MORE INTENSIVE CARE” of the MENTAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT of

WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, where I hear

constant, ceaseless load screams, random riveting banging on the doors, and loud

unending foul language.

[423] In addition to this, some of the patients on “THE OTHER SIDE” were locked in

their rooms like a prison cell for length of period of time which I do-not know. This

situation got better as time progressed, but it was more the case at the beginning of my

ordeal. The aforesaid, would be my fate, if I continue to ask the nurse in charge (Mrs

Hamilton), for a copy of the undisclosed Hospital Policy concerning pens, or if I humbly

request for her to spell her name, or if I humbly request to go and purchase pens and

some paper on my own accord.

[424] Since I was not being provided these necessary tools to conduct my present

Hospital Custody business, or my on going legal matters and personal business outside

of the Hospital which the unjust Hospital custody is damaging. In essence, the said

requested tools are necessary tool in todays modern society for affectively

administering to matters placed before a member of Canadian society.

[425] One must remember that I am essentially in prison; I am isolated from society at

large, I am in custody and can access the outside world for help only by Bell pay-phone

via 1-800-toll-free numbers and challenge my unjust custody by written articulation;


-113-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

since there is a want of due process and application of my rights was not being duly

administered to.

[426] It is my reasonable belief and personal opinion that, initial treatment in the mental

care unit at the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, is

drugs and isolation and dependancy.

[427] In custody, isolation from society at large is strictly enforced; so it is very difficult

to seek help if you are in an unjust and immoral situation. The enforced isolation

castrates ones ability for self help and steals ones independence. This creates a

dependence on the medical staff for any and every thing.

[428] Furthermore, you undergo a drug treatment before being graduated to a much

better part of the mental illness section of the hospital I heard; with exercise machines

and nicer treatments. I have witness patients who did nothing but sleep and eat for

many days. For example a black lady who was in room N.1. 123 who though that many

men was after her with knifes chasing her down the street.

[429] I was constantly being asked if I need something to sleep by the medical staff

and if I slept well. I am a person who can sleep sitting down, laying down on a thin

board, probably even in a three. In essence I have no problems sleeping, never have

and hopefully never will.


-114-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[430] As for as I am concern for people unluckily enough to be in my position of unjust

custody or more accurately in prison in a mental intensive care unit; drugs numb your

feelings, drugs numb your senses, drugs numb reality and drugs inhibit the efficiency of

the cognitive process or even impedes cognitive ability; so how is one suppose to

formulate a solution if I cannot feel or sense the reality of my problems? How are you

suppose to help yourself? How?

[431] In my opinion, when the afore said is concatenated, you have a pitiful, disarmed

and ineffective member of Canadian society. If make no difference if your cause is

noble, if your prayer for relief is just; you will get no understanding or empathy, for you

have already been effectively objectified and placed in an abstract psychiatric container

for the mentally diseased individual who do not have the same Rights and Freedoms as

other members of society at large.

[432] Maria’ roommate is Christina or she is more commonly known as Chris. She

came to Brampton Civic Hospital or was admitted to WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH

SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, Friday the 26th of August 2011, in handcuffs. for

trying to cut open the lower front leg close to her ankle.

[433] Christ came to the MENTAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT, where I was located on

Monday the 5th of September 2011, she was admitted to room N.1. 113 the same room

as Maria.


-115-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[434] Chris informed me that the other section she came from was much nicer and

nurse Janie seemed to be her nurse.

[435] FAIRNESS/UNIFORMITY AND EQUITY:

On the Tuesday the 06th of September 201, Chris spent the morning and after noon

making a lot of noise and disturbances. The following is some of the things she was

doing and screaming;

“I want to go home!”“This is bullshit!!”“Give me the papers, I will sign it and go home!”“Let me out of here!!!”“Give me, my stuff, I will get out of here!”“They are stupid, they don’t know what they are doing!!!”“I came here last friday in handcuffs!!”“Put them all in Jail!”“Let me out of here!!!”“am I going home or not!!”“I want to talk to Frank.”

[436] The staff is extremely tolerant of Caucasian patients. Chris nurse(Janie) reaction

was to say to Chris in a soft sweet voice;

“Don’t make so much noise, you will disturb the other patients.”

[437] It would be interesting to know the statistics on the percentage of minorities to

Caucasian from the much nicer section of mental health were Chris came from;

compared to the statistics on the percentage of minorities to Caucasian in the MENTAL

INTENSIVE UNIT, I am staying in?


-116-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[438] Similarly, in room N.1. 123 was a young Caucasian patient in about his twenties

are close to it. He wore expensive clothes and disclosed that his pajama pants cost

$200.00. The said pants were blue with flowers and look like silk or satin fabric. In

addition he had a small freezer bag full of coins for the phone.

[439] He was not violent, but he was extremely loud and disrespectful to the nurses. He

would say things out loud to the nurses which I didn't write done because of the extreme

vulgarity and explicit pornographic nature. I had to speak to him personally on three

occasion not to be so rude to the nurses or else they would put him on “THE OTHER

SIDE” and confine you to your room by locking you in from the outside. His famous

words was;

“You think you are smart! But I am smart too! I have all the time in the worlds!”

He was never transferred to “THE OTHER SIDE” ofcourse, he was just ignored.

[440] Similarly, in room N.1. 115 I believe but I could be wrong on this point; there was

a young 18 or 19 year old Caucasian patient of orthodox Jewish origin. His father

according to him was a drug dealer and was brutally killed when he was three years old.

He believed that their was many people chasing him and trying to kill him. So he was

placed under arrest by and off duty Police Officer byway of citizen arrest while going

through backyards to escape eminent pursuit. So he checked himself in to the Mental

Intensive Care unit at the Hospital for fear of personal harm to self. I don’t know if any of

this is true, but this is the information he disclosed to me while talking in the TV room.


-117-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

He enjoyed talking to me and wrongly though that I was 30 years old and use to work

with him.

[441] The patient spoken about in para [440], was not violent as far as I know. But he

was very loud and rude to the nurses judging by the names he use to call them while

yelling at them. He would do this regularly. I spoke to him on two occasion not to be so

rude to the nurses, because these type of things get back to your Doctor who is the one

who determines wether you should be released or not. He was also rude to his mother

on the phone in the same manner. Maybe it was just older woman in general, because

he was quite pleasant and respectful to me. This said patient was never transferred to

“THE OTHER SIDE” ofcourse, he was just ignored.

[442] Contrastly, I was polite to the nurses. I was firm on the issue of due process and

having the application of my rights duly administered to. But I was always respectful in

manner and language used with the Hospital Staff.

[443] Recall that I asked for the Hospital Policy to be disclosed to me and Mrs.

Hamilton(nurse in charge) shameless reaction was to tell me that the said policy was

not for me and to threaten to confine my person to the “THE OTHER SIDE” where you

hear screams and ranting such as Chris has been doing all morning and afternoon.

Sometimes the things get so childish and ridiculous.


-118-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[444] There is a checkers board in the lunch room, which I would use to press on like a

clip board to help me in taking notes when I was using the phone. I was always careful

to return it back to the top of the fridge in the lunch room when finished with it, everyone

saw me using it. One day I went to retrieve it to use it for taking some notes while using

the phone. It was not at its usually location.

[445] When looking for it I found it tucked in a corner in the nurses station, and not

being utilized. I was not looking for it in the nurses station, but the defibrillating machine

caught my eyes because electronics and technology is an interest of mine; the checkers

board was tucked away closed to the defibrillating machine in a corner on top of some

unknown materials. I explain to my nurse what I just said above and commented that it

was very childish to deny me the use of the checkers board in this manner. She said no

comment.

[446] Day-13 of my custody/self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner: On the Tuesday the 07th of September 2011, at about 9:00 A.M., I asked my

nurse(Mona) if I could use the courtesy phone. She said yes and to go to the “THE

OTHER SIDE”, where the phone is located. I need to speak to my lawyer who had

never seen me nor speak to me personally or electronically about the Appeal Hearing

byway of FORM3. In addition, I also needed make a LEGAL AID APPLICATION for my

SOCIAL BENEFIT TRIBUNAL HEARING on November 30, 2011; remember the day

before on September 6, 2011, nurse Janie and Mrs. Hamilton had prevented me from

completing my LEGAL AID ONTARIO call to make a legal aid application.


-119-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[447] LIE/DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS/DENIAL OF FAIR APPEAL HEARING:While I was speaking to my nurse and making arrangement to use the WILLIAM

OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital, MENTAL INTENSIVE CARE

courtesy phone; Mrs. Hamilton who was listening to the said conversation

promptly interjected and stated that the Courtesy Phone on the “ OTHER SIDE”

is not working. I knew this was a lie, or false information, because I had used the

phone in question on the night before to receive an outside call.

[448] I informed Mrs. Hamilton and my nurse(Mona) in clear distinct direct language,

that the phone was working , because I had used it the night before to receive a call.

[449] Mrs. Hamilton(nurse in charge), changed her statement to say that patients or

not allowed to use the said Courtesy Phone anymore. She did not offer a reason

why?

[450] I countered by saying, then say patients or not allowed to use the Courtesy Phone

instead of the Courtesy Phone is not working.

[451] I went to the pay phone to call the Rights Advisor, the Rights Advisor Office

Informed me that they could put me through to my lawyer D’arcy Hiltz, this is the

1st Time I have been advised that this was even possible by the PSYCHIATRIC

PATIENT ADVOCATE OFFICE or the RIGHTS ADVISOR(Pat Brar), after all this

time and my many calls to the Rights Advisor.


-120-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[452] Councilor D’arcy Hiltz assistant answered the phone. Mr./Ms. D’arcy Hiltz did not

have the common decency to inform his/her client (Wayne Ferron), that the Appeal

Hearing challenging FORM3. and the merits of a psychological assessment was

canceled. Mr./Mrs. D’arcy Hiltz assistant gave me this news on the phone when I called.

[453] I, have never met Mr./Ms. D’arcy Hiltz my lawyer. I have never sat down and

talked to Mr./Ms. D’arcy Hiltz my lawyer. Mr./Ms. D’arcy Hiltz has never came to the

Hospital to see me and take any statement from me or produce an Affidavit or hear my

side of the story. Not even on the phone, has my lawyer spoke to me. My lawyer

Mr./Ms. D’arcy Hiltz, is a phantom retained by the RIGHTS ADVISOR Pat Brar who has

refused to disclose legal Aid Ontario list of Tribunal Lawyers to me. I don’t even know if

my lawyer is male or female.

[454] So the Appeal Tribunal Hearing against FORM3. was canceled without

notice, without Due process or the application of my rights being duly

administered to. I have not spoken to a lawyer nor had the chance to speak to a

lawyer even though I had been given a phantom lawyer by the RIGHTS ADVISOR,

who does not speak to his client personally or give his/her client the opportunity

to instruct him/her.

[455] I do not have a lawyer to go over and review the necessary legal documents the

hospital require me to sign or to be released from custody.


-121-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[456] I am left alone, without due process, without a lawyer who would speak to me

personally; still in custody undergoing psychological assessment and without rights or

the application of my Rights and Freedom being duly administered to in accordance

with the supreme law of Canada. I am abandon to the mercy of the will of the Peel

Regional Police working vicariously through the Doctors who do-not seem to be acting

independently in retaining me in unjust custody. Like I said, I am a political prisoner.

[457] ONTARIO LEGAL AID: On the Tuesday the 07th of September 2011, I called Legal Aid to make an application

for Social Benefit Tribunal Hearing on November 30, 2011. I was put through to a Legal

Aid no longer supports Social Benefit Tribunal Hearing.

[458] I informed Legal Aid that Ontario Works documentation directed me to seek Legal

Aids help for finding a lawyer.

[459] Legal Aid Ontario told me that I have to first speed to the Legal Clinic, which

would then issue me a ticket, which would then enable legal Aid to consider me for

Legal Aid help for the Social Benefits Tribunal on November 30, 2011.

[460] I told Legal Aid that I was in custody at the Hospital and did not have access to

any phone except a Bell pay phone and had no mobility, so there was a barrier to entry

to access the Legal Clinic and subsequently Legal Aid.


-122-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[461] Legal Aid gave me a number to access the Legal Clinic(1 866 457 0160), but

upon trying to utilize the said phone number I was told by the bell operator that it was

not functional from my location.

[462] I phoned Legal Aid and advised them of the aforesaid, Legal Aid Ontario told me

the nurse can arrange for me to making a Legal Aid application for the Social Tribunal.

[463] I asked my nurse Just as Legal Aid directed me; my nurse advised me that the

medical staff does not make arrangement for Legal Aid Application, but Frank, the

Social Worker does. WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital,

and its relevant medical staff discharged me before I could arrange to speak to Frank.

[464] Day-13 of my custody/self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:

On the Tuesday the 07th of September 2011, at about 11:00 A.M. Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh

came to my room(N.1. 121) to engage me in uninformed conversation in violation of

Section 10 and Section 7. of the Charter. I advised the said Doctor that I have not seen

a lawyer yet nor have I spoke to a lawyer, despite my never ending plea and request for

for a lawyer which I can speak to and instruct.

[465] DOCTOR’S “BEST MEDICAL ADVICE”: On the Tuesday the 07th of September 2011, at about 11:00 A.M. Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh

advised me that I am now on FORM 5., so I am staying voluntarily; however, I cannot

leave the custody of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital,


-123-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

without first signing a RELEASE FROM HOSPITAL form, against the Doctors “BEST

MEDICAL ADVICE.”

[466] Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh advised me in no uncertain terms that I am a type A

personality; furthermore, I am odd and eccentric. I asked the same Doctor to define

odd within the context of type A personality? Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh could not in any shape

or form articulate the definition of “odd” within the context of a “Type A personality.”

Therefore, Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh on Tuesday the 07th of September 2011, at about 11:00

A.M. failed to define “odd” a word which was being used to profile me as having a

given mental state in a meaningful way.

[467] Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh tried to rescued his said advise and provide justification by

pointing to the fact that I am always writing; as to infer that this is what eccentric people

do. I countered and informed him that he as a Doctor writes a lot and take many notes.

He responded in the affirmative by concurring with my, then he justified it by affirming;

“Yes! But I have a reason for it.”

[468] I Wayne Ferron, solemnly affirm that I have an objective for all the writing and

documentation I do. First of all I write poetry, and I wrote a poem for someone as a

fulfillment of a promise. Second of all, I am carefully document events within my unjust

custody at WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, MENTAL

INTENSIVE CARE UNIT.” Thirdly and most importantly, in addition to the acts and acts


-124-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

of omission perpetrated against my person, I am building my case against the

actionable wrongs, injustice, and denial of my rights and denial of due process.

[469] The Judicial System has taught me to be prudent in important matters. The Court

System has high standards and will not except less. Doctors or prudent in their matters,

does this make them mentally ill with a Type A personality? Just because I am in

custody and in prison does not mean that I cannot do anything to help myself. I

document my custody for the further, I practice Yoga to maintain health and well being,

and I apply my bountiful patients for a better tomorrow. Hope is never dead!

[470] Like I said Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh, advised me that I was voluntarily staying;

However, I could not leave custody without signing a release from hospital form (legal

document) protecting WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital,

and staff from any liability.

[471] The reason Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh gives to justify the so-called “VOLUNTARY

CUSTODY”. The said doctor would like to do further assessment. Note that this is the

psychological assessment I Appealed against before the TRIBUNAL, and it was

cancelled without a formal notification.

[472] Therefore, I was successfully blocked from Appearing before an Impartial

Tribunal. So I am denied my fair Hearing before an impartial Tribunal, I am denied the


-125-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

right to instruct a lawyer because I have not yet spoken to a lawyer nor have had the

opportunity to instruct one in a meaningful way.

[473] I am still in custody and I am still undergoing uninformed psychiatric assessment

for mental illness. What has been change except barring me from having the application

of my rights duly administered to? I have been denied due process I have been denied

my Charter rights.

[474] In accordance with Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh given statements, his “BEST MEDICAL

ADVICE” is:

“i)The said Doctor require further assessment for mental disorder.

ii)When asked which mental disorders he has identified? He did-not answer in the

affirmative and list the said mental disorders. But he said in no uncertain language that;

“I am looking for mental disorders.” Image that, he is looking for mental disorders.

iii) When asked what justification he has? He said “The POLICE REPORT!”

iv) When asked what is in the said “POLICE REPORT”, he said; “I am not going to it

with you, you can ask for one to be disclosed to you after the assessment is completed.”

[475] So Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh, justification for a psychological assessment is based on

some secret document which I cannot hear about nor have the said document been

disclosed to me. Thus, in essence , I am being condemned by some secret document

by some secret document I cannot check for errors, accuracy or truthfulness. this is


-126-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

similar to what has been done in pass police states. Conviction and justification by

phantom witnesses and phantom documents.

[476] Day-14 of my custody/self-imposed hunger-strike as a political prisoner:On the Tuesday the 08th of September 2011, at about 9:30 A.M. Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh

came to my room(N.1. 121) to engage me in uninformed conversation in violation of

Section 10 and Section 7. of the Charter.

[477] 2nd REQUEST TO CONSUME PSYCHOTIC MEDICATION/RISPERIDONE: On the Tuesday the 07th of September 2011, at about 9:30 A.M.. Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh

requested of me for the second time to consume psychotic medication(Risperidone),

without a meaningful articulation of medical justification or even in the least a

demonstration of convincing evidence supporting his said oral requisition.

[478] I advised him in no uncertain terms, that I have not seem a lawyer and I need to

see my lawyer. He replied by saying that he would be releasing me today at about

10:00 A.M. and subsequently left.

[479] He returned shortly after leaving, to ask if I would like him to arrange counseling. I

told him I would like to speak to my lawyer to explain things to me. Furthermore; I am in

custody and am a prisoner. He said;

“You are quite a capable individual!”,

and he left abruptly.


-127-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[480] The discharge form states as follows;

“PATIENT’S DISCHARGE INFORMATIONCONSULTANT: DR. C-Ohene-Dar KohFAMILY DOCTOR: DISCHARGE DATE: 8 Sep 2011 WARD: MENTAL HEALTH INTENSIVE FINAL DIAGNOSIS: PARANOID PERSONALITY DISORDERFOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENTS AND SERVICES: (i.e.: Drs., Test, Treatments) NIL(PATIENT DECLINES)DIET INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN: NILACTIVITY LEVEL: AS TOLERATEDMEDICATION: NIFEDIPINE XL 60MG”

[481] served letter to Dr. Koczerginski and the “HEAD” of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH

CENTRE, Brampton Civic Hospital and a mailing address to send my personal

information.

[482] Day-14, DAY OF RELEASE FROM CUSTODY/IMPRISONMENT :

On the Tuesday the 08th of September 2011, at or about 10:30 A.M. my imprisonment

at the WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, Mental

Intensive Care Unit, ended.

[483] In addition to my request for information byway of the freedom and information

act, served on the “Head” of WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM on the 29th of August

2011; I served on Dr. Koczerginski and WILLIAM OSLER HEALTH SYSTEM, a letter

in which the first page disclosed an address to mail all information to my person. I

served the said letter to Nev(secutary) at 10: A.M on 8 th of September 2011, who gave


-128-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

it to Brenda(my nurse). The letter was later discarded outside the secretary’s window in

the nurses station under the watchful eye of the security camera.

[484] I arrived at Dundas/Huontario at about 1:50 P.M.; I got on the Dundas East

Mississauga Transit Bus to Cawthra.

[485] HOMELESS SHELTER:

On the Tuesday the 08th of September 2011, at or about 2:00 P.M. I reached 2500

Cawthra Rd. at the Salvation Army’s Emergency Shelter.

[486] Ms. Forgol, was at the intake office, she was extremely curtious and considerate;

there was however an discussion or argument being engaged in to resoled a problem of

admitting me to the shelter or not to admit me to the shelter. This produce two cases in

the aforementioned irregular situation.

TAKE NOTICE: The final decision for admission was left up to Nicole Arbour, my

Ontario-Works case worker at the Shelter.

[487] CASE 1:According to one perspective of the argument that was going on by the staff in the

intake office. Ms. Nicole Arbour discharge and restricted me on the 22nd of August

2011. The restriction according to the same staff is suppose to be 14 days. This was

affirmed and confirmed by Ms. Forgol and a tall Caucasian gentleman (Mr. Harry

Boom) who was acting in the capacity of a Salvation Army councilor after going through

the documentation in my file.


-129-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[488] CASE 2:According to the perspective of the argument that was going on by the staff in the intake

office. Ms. Nicole Arbour discharge and restricted me on the 22nd of August 2011. The

restriction according to some staff is suppose to be 30 days.

[489] In any event, I was given a copy of the of the August 15, 2011 letter discharging

me on the 22nd of August 2011, and told that I am restricted from August 22nd, 2011 for

30 days. The same letter does not mention the length of period for the so-called

restriction.

[490] Furthermore, I over heard another intake attendant saying that she showed Ms.

Nicole Arbour her discharged letter and she confirmed to her person that it was

indeed a 30 days restriction.

[491] On the Tuesday the 08th of September 2011, I filled out a formal request for

personal information and policy disclosure byway of the Freedom of Information Act.

[492] I informed, Ms. Forgol that I would like to speak to the manager. Ms. Forgol is a

very kind and hard working lady. She went over the data again and determined that the

restriction was for 14 days which had long passed, since I was in the Hospital for about

14 days.


-130-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[493] Ms. Forgol, presented her findings to Ms. Allison Waltho, the Program Director;

the Program Director concurred with Ms. Forgol and they both spoke to me privately in

the first intake room closest to the intake office.

[494] Ms. Allison Waltho, the Program Director said she would readmit me, however I

must abide by their rules and she went over some of those rules. I agreed, to see the

counselors as soon as possible to discuss finding a place or permanent accommodation

to live; after explaining the situation concerning myself, and my beloved daughter,

securing socially/morally acceptable standards of permanent accommodation(shelter).

In addition to this I also explained the occurrences relevant to Section 1. violations or

apparent violation of the Human Rights Acts.

[495] On the Tuesday the 08th of September 2011, at or about 2:30 P.M. I was

admitted to 2500 Cawthra Rd., the Salvation Army’s Emergency Shelter, which appears

to be under the carriage and control of Ontario-Works. In any event, at least its financial

carriage and control.

[496] TAKE NOTICE: I was left in the first intake office with Ms. Nicole Arbour who

allege that I was spreading lies about. This was highly irregular, since all meeting or

discussions always has at least two staff members as a matter of policy. Ms. Arbour

informed my person that I was spreading lies about her. I countered and said that

anything she was alleging, I disclosed in the written documentation I served on her and

ONTARIO-WORKS. Furthermore, I informed her that she was well in her rights to file a


-131-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

defamation suite if she reasonably believe that her claim has any merits or that an

actionable wrong had been committed against her person. When I asked her if it was

morally and socially acceptable for a father to be shearing a single room with his 17

year old daughter? She informed me that many people take this action or route to

secure a place to live.

[497] ORDERED TO VACATE SALVATION ARMY’S SHELTER:On the Monday the 08th of September 2011, at or about 2:00 P.M., I completed and

signed with the date, THE SALVATION ARMY Form for personal information request

and served the same document on the served the said form on the THE SALVATION

ARMY Manager at 2500 Cawthra Rd., the Salvation Army’s Emergency Shelter byway

of the Intake office (Ms. Forgol). Their has been no response even thought the request

was asked to be completed ASAP.

[498] On the Tuesday the 12th of September 2011, at or about 3:30 P.M. the

SALVATION ARMY has made a determination or ruling in violation of Section 1. of the

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT, in regards to equal services or uniformity in services among all

Canadians.

[499] The Salvation Army and Ontario-Works made a determination vicariously through

Mr. Harry Boom (case worker), in violation of Article 2. of the INTERNATIONAL

COVENANT of CIVIL an POLITICAL RIGHTS.

“Canada is a signatory to the International Convention of the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination. Article 2 of the International Convention mandates that all state


-132-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

parties “undertake to pursue by all appropriate means and with out delay a policy of elimination racial discrimination in all its forms...”

The aforementioned is a promise by the signature states made to the international

community and its citizens to enforce and protect HUMAN RIGHS and human dignity.

[500] For example, “Mary”, a caucasian female has been at the Salvation Army Shelter

for much longer than I have; the only differences is that she is a Caucasian Female and

I am a Black Male. I came to the said Shelter and met Mary, I got discharged on August

22, 2011 and went to the Hospital for 14 days and returned to witness Mary still living at

the shelter. On the day that Mr. Harry Boom informed me that I have to leave the next

day in strong direct and clear articulation; I overheard Mary asking Mr. Harry Boom

when he was going to fix her phone which was having charging issues.

[501] On the 1st of October 2011 at about 11:30 A.M. or close to the said time; I saw

Mary with a friend on the Hurontario (19) Bus on her way to Square One. She disclosed

to me that she was still at the Salvation Army Shelter and was planning on leaving the

following Monday. Thus, asper Mary she was leaving the Salvation Army Shelter on the

3rd of October 2011. Yet the 2 week stay policy has not been enforced against her!

[502] Similar, “Steve” a caucasian French Quebec gentleman with a very large

overgrown red beard, has been at the shelter for over 1 month and yet the 2 week stay

policy has not been enforced against him! The only difference between Steve and I are.

he his French male Caucasian and I am a Black male.


-133-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[503] Similar, my roommate in room 125 and occupying bed 125C I believe(lower

bunk) a very intelligent caucasian gentleman, has been at the shelter for over 1 month

and yet the 2 week stay policy has not been enforced against him! The only difference

between my roommates and I is he his a male Caucasian and I am a Black male.

[504] There are many many many such examples as the aforementioned. I took a

mental note of at least 7 such examples. All that needs to be done is a check and

confirmation of my allegation byway of the intake history in the intake files.

[505] On Tuesday the 12th of September 2011, all morning and all afternoon for my

1:00 P.M. appointment with Ontario-Works and the SALVATION ARMY jointed co-

counselors. The Ontario-Works councilor's name I still don’t know, and the Salvation

Army’s counselor was Mr. Harry Boom has made a determination or ruling in violation

of Section 1. of the HUMAN RIGHTS ACT, in regards to equal services or uniformity in

services among all Canadians.

[506] The same appointment was suppose to be about, budget, financial constraints,

relevant resources and housing. It was pushed from 1:00 Pm to 3:00 P.M. and I even

attended a class on problem solving with Mr. Harry Boom before the necessary meeting

to put into action the wheels of recovery for normal living.


-134-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[507] I was informed by the Program Director (Ms. Allison Waltho), upon admission

into the Salvation Army’s Shelter that the said meeting with both counselors was

necessary and mandatory. So I fulfilled my part of the obligation and made an

appointment.

[508] At the same appointment their was no introduction by the counselors. I still do-not

know, nor do I have the Ontario Works counselors business card. Mr. Harry Boom’s

business card I received upon request. He was, reluctant in relinquishing it, stating upon

it’s disclosed release;

“you are not going to use this against me?”

[509] I replied by stating that I have already informed him (Mr. Harry Boom) of the

violation of Section 1. of the HUMAN RIGHTS ACT. Contrastly, no one informed me

about establishing housing, operation budget, if I had secured accommodation or had

the common decency to give me written notification and time to vacate the shelter; I was

simple thrown out or a demand was made for me to vacate the shelter the next day in

no uncertain terms.

[510] In my humble opinion, the determination was already predetermined before I

walked into the Office. I was simply told that I had exhausted my-stay and I must leave

the next day! I was not asked relevant questions, but questions about my beloved child;

misdirected questions whose answers had already been given.


-135-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[511] On the 12th of September 2011 at about 3:30 P.M., I was informed orally in no

uncertain terms at about 3:30 P.M. that I must vacate the Salvation Army’s Shelter the

next day, with the Ontario-Works counselor’s who discloser of her identity by way of

business card is still pending. What I wanted is due process according to the Charter of

Rights and Freedom.

[512] TAKE NOTICE: One will not be admitted to an Emergency Shelter without a

Doctors Release Medical papers which are suppose to be privilege information which

has now become available to hordes of people and and other institutions. On the 13th

of September 2011 I served on the Salvation Army and Ontario-Works a request for all

my personal information at about 10:30 A.M. byway of Samantha(intake Officer) and left

the said facility to comply with the demands made on my person.

[513]SUMMARY:

[28] FORM 42

“This is to inform you that Dr. Jeffry Handler examined you on 26/08/2011 and has made an application for you to have a psychiatric assessment.

The physician has certified that...he has reasonable cause to believe that you have:

✓behaved or behaving violently towards another person or have caused or are causing another person to fear bodily harm from you; or




-136-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

✓serious bodily harm to another person; or


{...}



[28] FORM 42

“This is to inform you that Dr. R Hood examined you on 26/08/2011 and has made an application for you to have a psychiatric assessment.

The physician has certified that...she has reasonable cause to believe that you have:




{...}



[28] FORM 3





✓serious physical impairment of you, unless you remain in the custody of a psychiatric facility;


-137-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

{...}

If you wish to challenge your detention, you have the right to a hearing before the Board. You may apply for a hearing by completing FORM 16(attached).

date: August 29, 2011 signature of... physician: Dr. Koczerginski

After you receive this notice, a person called a “rights adviser” will meet with you to inform you as to your rights and help you in applying for a hearing if that is what you wish to do. You have the right to retain and instruct a lawyer without delay.”

[28] FORM 5



Date 6 Sep 2011”

[28] RELEASE FROM HOSPITAL

“I am removing ......................................., from hospital on my volition, even though it is against the advice and direction of my physician(s), and/or staff of William Osler Health Centre.In making this decision, I hereby release the Hospital, its staff and my attending physician(s) from all claims of any nature that my result as a consequence of this decision...”

[28] PATIENT’S DISCHARGE INFORMATION

“PATIENT’S DISCHARGE INFORMATIONCONSULTANT: DR. C-Ohene-Dar KohFAMILY DOCTOR: DISCHARGE DATE: 8 Sep 2011 WARD: MENTAL HEALTH INTENSIVE FINAL DIAGNOSIS: PARANOID PERSONALITY DISORDERFOLLOW-UP APPOINTMENTS AND SERVICES: (i.e.: Drs., Test, Treatments) NIL(PATIENT DECLINES)


-138-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

DIET INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN: NILACTIVITY LEVEL: AS TOLERATEDMEDICATION: NIFEDIPINE XL 60MG”

[28] Wrongly or rightly, as for as I am concerned, my legal Rights exist, the supreme

law of Canada is alive and well. The Charter is transcendental, and is not rendered

impotent because the Regional Police decides to arrest me, then circumvent my legal

Rights by bypassing the Judicial system and placing me under custody in the WILLIAM

OSLEN HEALTH SYSTEM, Brampton Civic Hospital, Mental Intensive Care unit, for

seeing the ends of justice of an allege assault by Officer Perkins(2261). I don’t even

know who has carriage and control over me at this point; the Brampton Civic Hospital or

the Peel Regional Police Service.

[28] The whole even is strange and questionable;

I. I have not been issued any tickets for any crime or crimes committed;

II. I have not been issued any summons to appear to be spoken to for identification

of a criminal act, before a judge in a court of competent jurisdiction;

III. I have not entered into any recognizance of bail;

IV. I have not been served any warrants for contravention of any section of the

criminal code or for lawful search for evidence of a crime or crimes reasonably

believe to have been committed; and

V. there has not been a disclosing of an information along with a crown’s brief.


-139-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

[28] The peel Regional Police Services reasons for making and adverse inference of

mental illness is the application of my Right to silence.

[28] I informed Officers that I will not make uninformed statement or have uninformed

conversation with with a person in authority many times(about 20). Because of my

application of my constitutional Right to silence, the Officers profiled my behavior as

bizarre and borderline, even though I repetitively informed them of my Rights to silence.

Different Officers would constantly harass me to to engage them in uninformed

conversation, even though I had not contacted a lawyer. One particular Officer was

even annoyed that I would have conversation with the emergency staff and not them.

[28] It is an officer’s duty to protect the constitutional Rights of the citizens of Canadian

society at large, and to protect their Human Rights, Civil Rights, Political Rights, and

any other Rights and Freedoms they may have.

[28] FORM 42

After being assaulted and my well being threaten by the Peel Region Police, in addition

to having the phone hung up on me twice after call 911 for help; I am examined for less

than 1 min by Dr. Handler and profiled as a mentally diseased violent person who other

people fear bodily harm from. This is systemic racism in action along with racial

profiling.

“This is to inform you that Dr. Jeffry Handler examined you on 26/08/2011 {...}


-140-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

✓behaved or behaving violently towards another person or have caused or are causing another person to fear bodily harm from you...”

FORM 42

[220] After being assaulted and arrested by the Peel Region Police for trying to file

charges against Officer Perkins (2261 ) on a Friday; I was not allowed to file charges

because justice was taking a holiday in violation of Section 15. of the Charter and

Section 504. of the C.C.; I am examined for less than 7 min by Dr. Hood and profiled as

a mentally diseased with serious physical impairment of myself. This is systemic racism

in action along with racial profiling.

“This is to inform you that Dr. R Hood examined you on 26/08/2011 and has made an application for you to have a psychiatric assessment...”

FORM 30

[220] As time progresses, one can see the nonuniformity and inconsistency in my

apparent mental state. Dr. Koczerginski after violating my Section 10. and Section 7.

rights and continued to try to engage me in more uninformed discussion, profiled me as

a mentally diseased person with serious physical impairment of myself. This is systemic

racism in action along with racial profiling.





✓serious physical impairment of you, unless you remain in the custody of a psychiatric facility...”


-141-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

FORM 5

[220] Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh, after determining that he has not observed any bizarre

behaviour decided to put me on a FORM 5; decides to profiled me as a mentally

diseased person with TYPE A PERSONALITY DISORDER. This is systemic racism in

action along with racial profiling.



Date 6 Sep 2011”

[220] Dr. Ohene-Dar Koh,

successfully blocked from Appearing before an Impartial Tribunal. So I am denied my

fair Hearing before an impartial Tribunal, I am denied the right to instruct a lawyer

because I have not yet spoken to a lawyer nor have had the opportunity to instruct one

in a meaningful way and having the application of my rights duly administered to.

[220] After determining that he has not observed any bizarre behaviour, no evidence of

risk of physical impairment or overt psychosis and went as far as saying that I was a

well capable individual; decides to profiled me as a mentally diseased person with

PARANOID PERSONALITY DISORDER. This is systemic racism in action along with

racial profiling.


-142-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

PATIENT’S DISCHARGE INFORMATION

“PATIENT’S DISCHARGE INFORMATIONCONSULTANT: DR. C-Ohene-Dar KohFAMILY DOCTOR: DISCHARGE DATE: 8 Sep 2011 WARD: MENTAL HEALTH INTENSIVE FINAL DIAGNOSIS: PARANOID PERSONALITY DISORDER”

Sworn before me at the City of Brampton

in the Regional Municipality of Peel, on

the ......... day of December 2011.

...............................................................................................

................................................................................................

Wayne Ferron

Commissioner for Taking Affidavits (or as may be)


-143-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

All of which is respectfully submitted.

Dated 13th day of April 2011

________________Wayne Ferron

3221 DERY RD. #3PO BOX 13563

Mississauga, ON, L5N 8G5, Email: [email protected]

TO: The Clerk of the Court--RegistrarONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE(Central West Region)

← A GRENVILLE and WILLIAM DAVIS COURTHOUSE← 7755 Hurontario St, Brampton, ← ON, L6W 4T6←


mailto:[email protected]

-144-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................

← Tel: 905 456 4700←←

←←


Wayne Ferron -versus-

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA et al.

Ontario Superior Court of Justice

(Central West Region)

PROCEEDING COMMENCED AT

A GRENVILLE and WILLIAM DAVISCOURTHOUSE

7755 Hurontario St, Brampton, ON, L6W 4T6

Tel: 905 456 4700

AFFIDAVIT of APPLICANT(Wayne FERRON)

Wayne Ferron3030 Pendleton Rd, Mississiauga , ON, L5N 7C5

Tel: 905 785 8643, Email: [email protected]


mailto:[email protected]

-145-Court file No.: CV-11- ...................


criminalbydesign.files.wordpress.com€¦ · web viewontario superior court of justice (central...

Documents