aspiremarketing.files.wordpress.com€¦ · web viewbecause it is such a long-standing component...
TRANSCRIPT
Hart 1
: : Social Media and Public Relations : :
@sam_hart89
@dordtcollege
Hart 2
Social Media and Public Relations
#introduction
Public relations (PR) has been a staple of business and marketing
practices for a long time. The generally accepted definition of public
relations, per the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) says that PR,
“Helps an organization and its publics adapt mutually to each other” (2011).
Ever since the early part of the 20th century, public relations has served as
the communication vessel between corporations and the community. In
recent decades as the emphasis of business perspective shifted from
production and sales to customer satisfaction, public relations has been
paramount in effective communication from the business to the consumer. In
fact there are entire public relations agencies that offer their services to
companies, taking over the need for an in-house PR department.
Because it is such a long-standing component to the business model,
many public relations techniques have been around for years. However with
the advent of the World Wide Web and the capabilities of what is being
called Web 2.0, public relations has been forced to take on a dramatically
different appearance. And it is especially challenging because both methods
require wildly different implementation schemes. While in traditional media
proven formulas can be easily adjusted to meet a specific company’s needs,
digital marketing requires a bit more experimentation. Essentially, the “tried-
and-true” practices associated with public relations are being swapped out
for a “try-and-try-again” approach.
Hart 3
As marketers continue to learn more about the capabilities of the
digital component, businesses adopt new methods of communication to the
public. Though the promise of the web is not a new phenomenon, it has been
—for the most part—untamed. The premise for my research this semester
has been threefold: first to understand the fundamental principles of public
relations, next to learn how to use a variety of social media sites, and finally
to develop ways to unify both social media and PR in one effective approach.
Although many businesses and marketing textbooks have embraced the
generic idea that social media can be used, they have done little to flesh out
this concept. There are several useful social media websites that will be
considered in my discussion of the topic, including but not limited to the
following: Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, YouTube, and Wordpress.
Throughout this paper, I will help solidify the notion that these two marketing
components can be effectively combined by showing practical ways to
complete this union.
#traditionalPR
Though we have considered the definition of public relations, we
should also take into account the purpose or intent of public relations. Many
people will inaccurately equate public relations with free publicity, shameless
attempts to attach a company name to a noble cause in hopes of increasing
business. Others simply attribute crisis management as the primary function
of PR, since this is a critical element of a practioner’s role. During my
research into the fundamentals of public relations, I quickly learned that
Hart 4
though publicity and crisis management are components of the public
relations trade, they are not definitive pieces. The purpose of public relations
I think is best put by Guth and Marsh in their textbook, Public Relations: A
Value-Driven Approach: “Public relations fosters mutually beneficial
relationships” (2011, p. 3). Like any communication process, public relations
should involve listening as well as talking. By talking, firms can provide
insight to their target audience about what they stand for; by listening, firms
can also gain insight about what their target audience would like to see from
the company. In this manner, public relations intends to be good for both
parties involved because they gain from each other’s insight.
Before diving too deep into the specifics of unifying public relations
and social media, it is helpful to examine some of the classic or “tried-and-
true” methods that have gotten PR to the level it is at today. At the very
beginning of the public relations process is a four-step model that highlights
the action from start to finish: research, planning, communication, and
evaluation.
To further complicate this four-step model, these steps do not always follow
this pattern; frequently practitioners (those practicing public relations) must
switch back and forth between steps because the information is continually
changing. Also missing in this diagram is a value system, which in reality
may be threaded throughout the four-steps. Values determine what is
Research: gather info about the problem
Planning: strategy about how to address
problem
Communication: execution
phase of solution
Evaluation: assess the
effectiveness of efforts
Hart 5
important in addressing the problem and will therefore dictate the action
taken in response to that problem. For the sake of completeness, consider
each of these steps individually in the following paragraphs (Guth & Marsh,
2011).
#research. As noted, the first step in the process is to gather
information about the problem. Of course it is simple to make a list of what
we already know in regards to the issue at hand, the more important piece in
this step to consider is the information that we do not already have. While I
do not intend to belittle the research process, it is far too intricate to
describe in this paper. Just recognize that there are many different tools to
help practitioners gather the information that they need to do their jobs.
Surveys, focus groups, secondary research, and communication audits are all
examples of these tools. Though the tools of research are important, it is the
thought behind them that is critical to have accurately identified. For
example, a survey of 1,000 young adults aged 21-25 about their opinions of
children’s toys does little to help a company like Toys ‘R’ Us, since the
company is not targeting this demographic. In order to have the most
effective communication between the client and their customers, we have to
have completely gathered the pertinent information so that we can more
accurately strategize in the later steps of the model.
#planning. There is an old proverb that says, “If you fail to plan, then
you plan to fail.” Planning, which is step two in our four-step model, is one of
the most important aspect of a PR manager’s job. In the research step, the
Hart 6
manager collected a variety of data that helped to identify opportunities or
problems that needed to be dealt with. Figuring out exactly how to approach
needs uncovered by research is where planning comes in. Before becoming
immersed in any plan however, practitioners must recognize one important
characteristic of these plans. Guth and Marsh (2011) emphasize that, “All
public relations plans should be value-driven” (p. 230). Though
organizational values inevitably vary depending on the institution, having a
value-driven approach is vital. By being cognizant of company values, the
planning stage will much more effectively accomplish the company goals for
a particular PR campaign.
Clearly a plan is necessary and it must be steered by a value system,
but those plans can take on many different shapes based on formality.
Regardless of the intricacy of the public relations plan, the basic mold for the
plan is threefold: situation analysis, goals and objectives, and lastly
strategies and tactics. According to Y. Buchanan at a PR Agency in Michigan,
“all PR plans attempt to answer three questions. Where are we now? Where
do we want to be? How do we get there?” (2011). The first question
coincides with the situation analysis, taking into consideration the research
conducted in step one to fully describe the current state. Next the goals and
objectives aim to get the company to a place that they would like to be after
the campaign or the plan is complete. Finally answering the last question
requires strategies and tactics to be considered; strategy is the broad term
Hart 7
for the approach that will be taken, whereas tactics are the tools used to
implement that strategy.
Within this framework, it is good to ensure that the plan is both flexible
and realistic (Guth & Marsh, 2011, p. 245). One of my old bosses told me
that too many businesses that she had seen fail over-promised and under-
delivered. It is helpful for companies to have high aspirations, but when it
comes to a plan it is important to rein these dreams in so that they can
gradually become a reality. This will reflect the company much better in the
eyes of the public than the business that cannot deliver because their plan
was too much for them to accomplish. Instead of over-promising, it is better
to under-promise (within reason) and over-deliver to the extent that the
company can.
#communication. After carrying out extensive research and creating
a thorough plan, the implementation stage of the process is next. There are
a myriad of possibilities available to practitioners in this step, from press
releases to celebrity endorsements. The following table from the Guth and
Marsh textbook shows the sheer number of options for communication to
traditional audiences (2011, p. 264).
Tactics for Traditional PublicsSOCIAL MEDIA actualities face-to-face meetingsblogs digital newsrooms GOVERNMENTSmicroblogs news conferences lobbieswikis public service
announcements grassroots lobbying
content communities guest editorials and commentaries political action committees
social networks letters to the editor and comments soft money
podcasts/vodcasts interviews disclosure documents
Hart 8
social bookmarking satellite media tours CUSTOMERS
social media news releases stories for trade or association magazines
product-oriented news releases
EMPLOYEES INVESTORS product-oriented media kitsface-to-face meetings newsletters special eventsnewsletters magazines open houses and toursmagazines letters and e-mails responses to customer
contactsvideos annual meetings cell phone text messagingbulletin boards annual reports mobile marketingspeeches websites CONSTITUENTS (VOTERS)intranets facility tours letters and e-mails e-mail conference calls newslettersinstant messaging news releases to financial
news media news releases
special events media advisories to financial news media media advisories
NEWS MEDIA webcasts news conferencesnews releases COMMUNITY GROUPS speechesmedia kits volunteering face-to-face meetingsfact sheets donations websitesbackgrounders sponsorships responses to constituent
contactsphoto opportunity sheets cause marketing/cause
branding BUSINESSES
media advisories speeches stories in trade magazinespitches (letters, email, phone) open houses and tours extranetsvideo news releases
Part of the challenge involved in public relations is the fact that the
playing field is ever-changing. Whether the audience, the inputs, the
environment changing, each problem that a PR plan aims to address will be
in some way unique. Practitioners must consider a list of several criteria in
determining which tactics to utilize. For example the tactics should be
targeted to meet the specific needs of a single audience, since the same
tactic may not be as effective in another target. Another characteristic of
successful implementation is that it is specific, based on the research in step
one and the plan in step two. Though there are several other factors to
Hart 9
consider before choosing the best communication channel, suffice it to say
that the process is not simple due to the large amount of variability that can
come into play as well as the different implementation options.
#evaluation. After researching, planning, and communication, the
only phase left in the four-step model is to evaluate the results of the PR
campaign. In regards to evaluation, public relations is often difficult to assess
because it is hard to give a feeling of goodwill a quantifiable number. It is
quite likely that if a public relations campaign goes exactly according to plan,
the company will be thought of in a better light but that might not translate
directly to immediate profit. For example, compare the results of a
promotional campaign that involves coupons with a PR campaign that
involves sponsorship for the Special Olympics. When customers use their
coupons, the business is able to track exactly where that coupon went and
how long it took for that individual to use it. They can also see how the
number of sales of that discounted product increased (or decreased) based
on their promotional efforts. However when a company opts to sponsor the
Special Olympics and donates $1,000 for a 2-inch square logo on the back of
a t-shirt, the most that a company can hope for is that they make an
impression on the audience for the Special Olympics; no one is going to bring
that t-shirt into a store and claim that they want to buy a product as a result
of the donation.
The direct return garnered from the coupon exchange is a quantifiable
measure known as a return on investment (ROI). Business owners and
Hart 10
executives like ROI because it shows them directly how their efforts are
affecting their net profit. As we see with PR campaigns, many marketers and
public relations practitioners alike encounter this problem of intangible
results. Under pressure to make their efforts seem worthwhile, other
measures have been created to display the campaign results. Advertising
value equivalency (AVE) is one such calculation that takes the advertising
rates and amount of coverage into consideration. In the above example, the
2-inch logo on t-shirts is worth $1,000 ($500 per inch). Another recent
measure is weighted media cost (WMC), and it attempts to compare the
effect that the campaign has over the course of time. It is less quantifiable
still, but can be more accurate if executives are willing to consider it.
Whatever measures are chosen to evaluate the effectiveness of a
public relations campaign, it is important to weigh the results against the
goals and objectives that were established in the planning stage. Evaluation
is also something that can happen in small increments throughout the four-
step model to ensure that the process is on the right track. By accurately
evaluating results, it is also possible for the public relations team to see
where mistakes were made and how to correct them in future efforts.
Although it can be easy to forget about this step and move onto other PR
campaigns, skipping this step will prove to be deadly in the long run for
public relations.
#web2.0
Hart 11
Now that I have described some of the fundamentals of the public
relations process, I would like to point out that the web has dramatically
changed the playing field for public relations professionals. Developing
media relationships through successful press releases and pitch letters were
once key aspects to a PR practitioner. According to researchers Napoli,
Taylor, and Powers (1998), practitioners wrote on average seven pitches
each month trying to convince journalists to publish a story in their
newspaper or media outlet. An employer survey by Fawkes and Tench in
2005 showed that one of the most desirable qualities in potential public
relations employees is high-level writing capacity. Given the belief that third-
party stories often are regarded as a more valuable influence for the public,
it is understandable that effective pitches are important to employers.
However the prevalence of information available on the Internet has altered
the sources that people go to read news or gather product data. The public
used to check movie times or a grocery store ad in the newspaper, but now
that information is available at the click of a button…for free!
While journalists scramble for pertinent information that their
audiences will appreciate, practitioners are able to take their stories to
multiple sources. Though they may choose to send out the traditional pitches
via email to interested newspapers or bloggers, they may choose to take
their information to social media or pursue other web options. PR
professionals have gone from being the cat, in constant pursuit of the
mouse, to the mouse that journalists have to chase after.
Hart 12
As I noted in the introduction, there is a certain amount of ambiguity
involved with transitioning from traditional methods to digital public relations
concepts. There are a number of social media sites available to practitioners,
yet the outcome of these efforts is what intimidates many from testing the
social media waters. In the next few pages, I will take a look at some
practical ways to use social media in a public relations mindset. By no means
do I claim to have the answers to all of the questions surrounding this
transition to the Web 2.0. However I do think that it is important for any
business to acknowledge the potential held in social media, and at least
consider utilizing it as part of their marketing or public relations strategy.
There are conversations going on in the small communities held in social
networks that companies need to take part in. Many businesses have
flourished as a result of their digital efforts, and as more knowledge is gained
about this component I think more businesses will adapt to the change.
If we were playing a word association game and I said, “Social
network,” the most common, one-word response would likely be “Facebook.”
There is an unreal amount of people with registered Facebook accounts,
ranging from children to mature adults. If Facebook were a country, it would
be the third largest in the world. With this kind of audience, how can any
business decline a chance to take part in a conversation here? Taking part in
this social media avenue does have high risks though; if it goes well then
hundreds of people might read the content, but if it goes poorly then millions
Hart 13
could possibly see the message and misinterpret it. With this much riding on
the effectiveness of utilizing the medium of Facebook, it is necessary to not
abandon the four-step model that is part of the traditional public relations
practice. It is important to assess the situation at hand, develop goals and
objectives, and then select a strategy that will help accomplish those goals
for the Facebook campaign. Although the same can be said about PR efforts
on other social media sites, it is especially true for one as large as Facebook.
Despite the similarities in the two approaches to public relations,
Facebook differs in three important ways. According to an article by P.
Volmar at the Public Relations Society of America
technology conference in 2010, companies should (1) take
advantage of people’s social connections, (2) forget about
amassing followers, and (3) be someone that people enjoy
talking to. Because people are so well connected, it is
possible for campaigns, contests, or conversations to permeate throughout
several markets. While a company may not get a new customer out of a
campaign, they might make a new connection and have a chance to develop
that new relationship. Many firms get caught up trying to build a huge
follower number, thinking that more connections results in the best
possibility of impressions; a large following also looks good to the
supervisors. Volmar encourages that “Instead of concentrating on numbers,
concentrate on conversations to make connections meaningful” (2010, p.
14). Lastly, the obvious step is to just be a friendly person that will not only
Hart 14
push information on followers but will also take time to listen to what they
have to say.
One of the best analogies for a business presence likens Facebook to a
cocktail party. While the party might be a fun time for the individuals
involved, ultimately the goal for the determined individual should be to build
connections that will hopefully transition into business down the road. At this
party, it would not be good to go from table to table handing out business
cards like they are dollar bills; people will not appreciate that individual
gesture and will not be likely to remember them for business later. This is
like the company that is obsessed with generating huge follower numbers.
Also it would not be socially acceptable to approach different groups,
mechanically present a short pitch, and then move onto another group.
Rather it would be to the company’s advantage to spend time getting to
know the people at the party on an individual level. At this cocktail party, an
unsuccessful businessman would leave empty-handed, having passed out all
of his business cards with nothing to show for it. However a successful
practitioner will leave from this cocktail party with dozens of business cards
from people that he began to develop meaningful relationships with. In the
same way, a company should approach Facebook with the intent of
developing meaningful, lasting relationships with a few people. Ultimately
their following will gradually increase, but they need to recognize that social
media is not a short-term project but a long-term networking option.
Hart 15
Twitter is the most popular of a group of social media that fall under
the category of microblogs. Blogs are hosting sites that allow registered
users to post stories and articles online, free of charge most of the time.
Microblogs differ from blogs in that they limit the number of characters given
to convey the message. For example Twitter limits users to a 140-character
message, which is in fact shorter than most standard text messaging
constraints. People use Twitter to get access to information quickly in real
time; often I look to Twitter for updates on Dordt athletic scores or other
game day articles. Tweets can be appear in Google search results and can
also feature links to other sites, blogs, pictures, or videos. They are also
challenging because they must capture attention in a brief sentence or two.
Though there is less back-and-forth interaction on Twitter, it is a site that
public relations practitioners can certainly take advantage of if they are
intentional about their strategy and tactics.
In regards to microblogging, the message is the most important
element and should generate the most attention from a public relations
team. The AMA Handbook of Public Relations by R. Dilenschneider (2011)
contains a few tips for creating content to share on sites like Twitter. The
author advises to “look for what resonates, make it heavy on emotion, and
target the message at the ‘other,’ not oneself” (p. 29). With such few words,
it is important to make sure that the message will have an impact in as many
circles as possible. Emotional messages often play to this idea as well,
especially if they are directed to others and not a business. Reading a tweet
Hart 16
about a bad day at the office will not do much to enhance the company
image, but rejoicing in the Packers’ Super Bowl win last year will hit home
with the throngs of Packer fans worldwide.
Whereas Facebook is focused on developing deeper relationships by
penetrating social networks, Twitter is better used for firing off bits of
information sporadically throughout the day. Twitter users seldom hold
entire conversations using that platform, and at most will reply to a post with
a comment. One way that people can show their appreciation for something
specific is through the “retweet” function. When a tweet is retweeted by
another user, that tweet appears in the user’s timeline with the username of
the original tweeter. By following Dilenschneider’s advice about creating
content to tweet about, there is a higher chance that content will be shared
among others. For public relations professionals, Twitter holds potential to
disseminate exciting messages quickly for the desired publics. It is important
to realize that not every company is made for Twitter, and that is perfectly
acceptable. If an organization cannot make a platform like Twitter work, then
they should pursue other social media options.
#google+
Google+ is the newest social media site to hit the stage, and like any
new product on the market there are quite a few people that are excited
about it. While the hype for sites like these ebb and flow as frequently as the
tides, there are neat distinguishing features that set Google+ apart from
other sites like Facebook and Twitter; even respected social media author C.
Hart 17
Brogan is ready to crown Google+ as a “social media game changer”
(Kessler, 2011).
One of the biggest differences is the categorization that exists. Users
can create circles of people to follow in sections like “friends” or
“acquaintances.” If an individual or a company would like to share a link with
only friends, Google+ allows the user to do that. At the same time, content
can be visible to anyone as long as they are in the specified circle that the
message is going out to. Profiles can be public, open to search, and because
Google controls it, SEO rankings are sure to be influenced a bit more by a
Google+ profile—if it is filled out properly. There are several other unique
characteristics of Google+ like “Hangouts,” “Sparks,” and even live music
streaming via YouTube. By unique characteristics, I mean that no other site
has tried to implement concepts like this before.
In order to really make a Google+ page stand out from the others,
there are a few useful pointers to consider before creating the account.
Again it is important to remember that the same fundamentals of public
relations apply to social media public relations, this time specifically through
Google+. These tips are from an article written by S. Kabani (2011), CEO of
the cutting-edge social media marketing company Zen Marketing Group.
1. Link other pages to Google+ and vice versa. By connecting
pages to each other, a company allows all current followers to connect
to the business in another way. Perhaps through this connection,
several more connections will be made with people on Google+ that
Hart 18
were not previously in a circle. This is the networking possibility that is
similar to afore mentioned sites like Facebook and Twitter.
2. Be active. Post videos, photos, links to articles, comment on others’
posts. The more chatter that is put out there, the more likely it is that
the page will be noticed by someone. Although there is a fine line
between frequent posting and annoying posting, there is nothing
wrong with posting useful feedback or input online. Interaction is
crucial.
3. Use circles to full potential. Google+ allows people to categorize
their connections and post information to specified circles. For
businesses, this means that users can have a circle of only prospective
clients or new clients that can then have messages targeted directly
towards them. These prospective or new clients also are unable to see
what circle they are in—they just know that they have been added.
Users can also re-categorize individuals, so if someone in the “potential
customer” circle becomes a customer, they can be moved into a
different circle like “clients.”
Activity is critical for Google+ users, because even though there are
substantially less people using this site there are still important potential
customers out there. Personally I have only had an account on there for
approximately two months. While I find the newness of the platform and the
unique features exciting, there have not been many interactions that would
cause me to indicate that Google+ is the way of the future. However this
Hart 19
past week I had an interaction with a post from the ESPN page and in the
next few days I had a notification saying that ESPN was now following my
content stream. Evidently through consistency and interesting content, a
national corporation deemed my page a worthwhile follow. Google+ will
continue to develop in the months ahead, and PR professionals should stay
keyed into what is going on here.
#socialmediaoverload
As I noted earlier, there are too many social media websites available
to cover in the scope of this paper. Although I would like to spend time
discussing the intricacies of posting to sites like YouTube, StumbleUpon,
Tumblr, Wordpress, Flickr, Pinterest, and LinkedIn, there is simply not
enough space for these details. Each one of these sites may be important to
have some sort of public relations presence on, but that is a decision that
must be made in the planning stage. Whatever platform (or platforms) is
selected, it is critical for the practitioner to continue to represent the
company equally across all channels. It is unwise to post a video on YouTube
of an executive saying something positive about company policies while a
Facebook post contradicts the exact message.
Also a presence on these sites can help to catch problem posts from
the public and correct the situation before it becomes a crisis. Domino’s
Pizza was victim to a situation where two employees posted a video of
themselves making a pizza that was dropped on the floor and spit on
numerous times before being sent out to a customer. With a web presence,
Hart 20
Domino’s saw the ads quickly and took prompt action to counteract the
negative publicity. By not having knowledge of the digital PR capabilities,
Domino’s might not have fully recovered from the extent of a viral video
such as this one.
To briefly summarize, here is a rundown of what the previously
mentioned websites allow businesses to do, and the potential that they have
for public relations. YouTube is a video-sharing site that can be used to put
videos up about the company, post commercials, or even reward people for
putting videos there of people using a certain product. Tumblr and
Wordpress are both blog-hosting sites that allow users to write articles of any
length for free and post them on a web domain. For PR practitioners, there is
an opportunity to convey a larger message to target publics, provided they
are willing to engage in a lengthy article. LinkedIn is a professional site that
professionals use to communicate with each other; it is possible that future
clients, investors, or employees can be found on this site. Flickr is a site
similar to YouTube except that instead of videos, photos are posted. Like
YouTube, Flickr holds potential to generate buzz through public postings of
products or events. Pinterest and StumbleUpon are both share-sites that
allow users to post content from across the web that they found to be
interesting.
Equally important to posting a value-driven message across all
platforms is the idea that these sites should be linked to one another.
Practitioners should strive to make it is simple as possible for people to share
Hart 21
content, like it, or repost it in some way. For example, blog posts on Tumblr
or Wordpress should have buttons at the beginning or end of the article that
allow users to post the link to Facebook, Twitter, or Google+. Though it is
unlikely for a customer to go out and search for a brand on a variety of social
media platforms, it is likely that they will check it out if they see that it is an
option after reading a good pitch.
#ping.fm
With so many different social media websites to keep track of, a public
relations professional could begin to feel a bit overwhelmed. Thankfully there
are options available that help to streamline the process of reading posts,
responding to inquiries, and posting updates across multiple platforms.
Ping.fm is a helpful tool that allows a user to link all of their social media
accounts to one website. Furthermore they are allowed to group their
accounts separately based on the content that is posted to them. For public
relations, this means that a practitioner can easily separate blogs, sites with
status updates, and picture or video posting sites. Then when there is a brief
headline that needs to go out, it is simple to post it to all sites with status
updates. Instead of writing several different blog posts for various sites, the
user can write one post on Ping.fm and elect to share it through their blog
group. In addition to being less time-consuming, this also ensures that the
message is identical across the Web.
Another incentive behind using a site like Ping.fm is the SEO ranking
that comes with effective integration. In a recent interview with a marketing
Hart 22
executive, S. Kabani (2010) found that business web pages jumped from
below the twentieth page on a Google search to the third page in a matter of
weeks (p. 139). Similar results were also seen on Yahoo! and Bing, which
leads me to believe that it is worth the effort to spend time completely
consolidating social media sites into one location like Ping.fm. There are
other sites that offer similar services, like HootSuite or Tweetdeck. These
sites allow users to access multiple feeds on one screen, instead of signing in
and out of different sites in an attempt to monitor conversation.
#conclusion
After looking at the capabilities of different social media sites, the
outlook for public relations in this digital field is exciting. Though the
environment is continually changing, this change benefits PR more than
anyone else I think. In the past, practitioners were forced to find creative
ways to portray the same content time and again; there are only so many
ways to write an attractive press release before the journalists tire of reading
them. With the advent of social media and Web 2.0, public relations
professionals have the ability to create unique content and present it in an
attractive manner.
Meanwhile the fundamentals of public relations are still important
aspects that should be incorporated into any PR approach online. By
understanding the four-step model of public relations in depth, I realize that
online campaigns should be created in a similar manner. In fact, social media
sites can be utilized at every stage in this process. Research can be
Hart 23
conducted on Facebook or in online forums, planning can be done via a site
like Google+, and the communication may be completed through Twitter and
Wordpress. After implementing the scheme, practitioners can monitor the
effectiveness by watching social media and engaging in valuable discussions
with contributing members.
Throughout this semester, a common theme that I came across
frequently was that PR agencies and departments should not be afraid of
trying out social media. It can be a tricky beast to tame, but with the proper
cautionary approach it can prove to be a very successful venture. Also it is
important to not get stuck in traditional or boring content, but to be creative
when posting to social media. People are waiting to engage in conversations
online, but it takes a bit of courage to step out on this limb. In the end, by
staying true to the foundations of PR and being familiar with a few different
web platforms, a unification of social media and public relations is entirely
possible.
Hart 24
References
Buchanan, Y. M. (2011). The purpose of a PR plan. In Clark Communications.
Retrieved December 15, 2011, from
http://www.clarkcommunication.com/PRTips/The_Purpose_of_a_PR_Plan
.php
Dilenschneider, R. L. (2011). The AMA handbook of public relations:
Leveraging PR in the digital world. New York, NY: Amacom
Fawkes, J., & Tench, R. (2005, May). Practitioner resistance to theory—An
evaluation of employers’ attitudes towards public relations education.
Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication
Association, New York.
Guth, D. W. & Marsh, C. (2011). Public relations: A value-driven approach. 5th
Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Kabani, S. H. (2011). 10 ways to use google plus for marketing. In The
Marketing Zen Group. Retrieved December 15, 2011, from
http://www.marketingzen.com/10-ways-to-use-google-plus-for-
marketing/
Kessler, S. (2011). Is google+ really a social media game changer?.
In Mashable. Retrieved December 15, 2011, from
http://mashable.com/2011/12/14/google-plus-changes-everything/
Napoli, P. M., Taylor, M., & Powers, G. (1998). Writing activities of public
relations practitioners: The relationship between experience and
writing tasks. Public Relations Review, 25, 369–380.
Hart 25
PRSA. (2011). Public relations defined. In Public Relations Society of America.
Retrieved December 15, 2011, from
http://www.prsa.org/AboutPRSA/PublicRelationsDefined/
Volmar, P. (2010). How to market like a pro on Facebook. Public Relations
Tactics, 17(7), 14-15.