Upload File

web 1.0 2.0 3.0

10

Upload: sonia-turmo

Post on 28-Nov-2014

843 views

Category:

Technology


3 download

Report

DESCRIPTION

Comparació i descripció de les web 1.0, 2.0 i 3.0

TRANSCRIPT

Diapositiva 1

Web 1.0, Web 2.0 & Web 3.0

WEB 2.0 APPLICATIONS - Kirkwood Community · PDF fileWHAT IS WEB 2.0? Web 1.0 Static Web 2.0 Dynamic Web 3.0

+2.0 -1.0 -3.0 -4.0 10, 000 a 25 28 30 29 24 14 14 S 14 E ... · +2.0 -1.0 -3.0 -4.0 10, 000 a 25 28 30 29 24 14 14 S 14 E 14 = 14 22 23 23 27 22 1000m -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -5.0 ILI 50

IRMS Presentation · 10 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 School OXA; OXA; GWC; MEL; All ANZ Schools; AUC; CAI; PER; MEL; SYD; AC Find a file Name OXF Alice House OXF_lnfoguide All

Marketing 1.0, 2.0 e 3.0.pdf

Delivery of Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler from a Valved Holding …€¦ · AeroChamber Plus* Flow-Vu* AVHC 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Fine Particle Mass (µg) Tiotropium 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

Werb 1.0, 2.0 y 3.0

Malaysia’s Competitiveness: Moving to the Next Stage Files/caon... · 2014-08-26 · 0% 10% 20% 30% 40%-4.0% -3.0% -2.0% -1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% Sri Lanka GDP per Capita, 2001,

Inertsil ODS-EP Technical Information · Comparison of inertness to oxine-copper between Inertsil ODS-EP and commercial embedded columns 1.0 2.0 3.0 Time (min) 1.0 2.0 3.0 Time (min)

Franco Scaglia Ottavio Tomasini Virgin Active, Fitness And ... · 2° 5 0 1.0 65 2.0 19 3.0 12 4.0 (m) (lux) 2° 5 0 1.0 65 2.0 19 3.0 12 4.0 (m) (lux) 2° 7 0 1.0 148 2.0 47 3.0

web 1.0, 2.0, 3.0

1.1 Your First Program · % java Quadratic –3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 ! % java Quadratic –1.0 –1.0 1.618033988749895 -0.6180339887498949 ! % java Quadratic 1.0 1.0 NaN NaN ! % java Quadratic

Home - WENR · ACADEMIC TRANSCRIPT Minor 0Bw 23.2015 CR 3.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 Admissi*' 1.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 8.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 80 c. c. AN ION TO ELECTIVE CLERKSHIP

Accountant 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 of Big4

About Network Nneutrality 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 I · Net Neutrality 2.0 Can or should the proposed principles and rules from policy About Network Nneutrality 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0

Q3 2008 INTERIM REPORT - KonecranesMarket Review - Q3-1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 yoy%-1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Global

The Startling Differences Between Hosted by: CMBS …1stsss.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/CMBS-1.0-v-2.0-3.0...The Startling Differences Between CMBS 1.0, 2.0 & 3.0 There Is Still

Outlook for Boxboard - Fastmarkets RISI · Should Remain Stable Through 2016 Challenging external environment for exporters-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 ... Most of Brazil’s

ANS Productivity, cost-effectivenessANS Productivity, cost ... · Geneva London AC Zurich Padova 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 Staffing per sector

Turkish Passenger Market Analysis Boeing Commercial Airplanesaviation.itu.edu.tr/img/aviation/datafiles/Lecture Notes... · 2014. 3. 7. · (4.0) (3.0) (2.0) (1.0)-1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0

By Elizabeth W. Woodcock, MBA, FACMPE, CPC MGMA Reimburseme… · 2016-11-10 · 2014-2.0% - - - -4.0% 2015 - -1.5% -1.0% -1.0% -5.5% 2016 - -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% -8.0% 2017 - -2.0% -3.0%

Marketing 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, atraer, compartir, conversar, co crear, experimentar + personas

Agile Software Development - edeleastar-portfolio.github.io · MinimaSolver Test 6 class MinimaSolverTest {val line = #[ 1.0, 2.0, 1.0, 2.0,-1.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 4.0 ] var MinimaSolver

1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 LTP Countywide Schemes (overview) 17 5

НЧ серія 2 вип.1312 Web 1.0 - - Web-Web 2.0 - Web 1.0 Web-Web-Web 3.0 - Web 2.0 -Web 4.0 - Web 3.0 Web 3.0 [21]. Web Wiki - Web 2.0 - p2p - BitTorrent

Web 1.0 2.0-3.0-4.0 Overview

Web 1.0, Web 2.0, Web 3.0

By Armen Ovanessoff and Eduardo Plastino - Accenture...FIGURE 4: FALLING SOUTH AMERICAN PRODUCTIVITY The region’s economies are becoming less productive. 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 2001 - 2005-2.0-1.0-3.0

CRYSTAL LAKE FAMILY ALUMNI AMP AND NVIRONMENTAL E C · TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1.0-Introduction 1.0-1 Section 2.0-Executive Summary 2.0-1 Section 3.0-Project Description 3.0-1

Comparación Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Web 3.0

Indian CV Industry€¦ · 4 2020 global recession now definite; year-long recession expected under global emergency scenario -4.0-3.0-2.0-1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 q1 2019 q2 2019

JOHNSON SCREENS® Vertical Sieve Screen MID/ V Copyrightfineco.lt/media/pdf/MID-V_2s_ENG_rz_web.pdf · 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 0.25 0.5 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 0.25 0.5 1.0

1.0 Urbanism Context 2.0 The Creative Process 3.0 ......2.0 The Creative Process 3.0 Achieving Quality Practices of City Planning and Development Management Beijing/Shanghai 2010 1.0

Ppt cqf-cpa - franchise 1.0, 2.0 et 3.0 (16 janvier 2014) ppt

environmentclearance.nic.inenvironmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/District/... · page no's 07 08 24 30 prepared by : sxo. 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 introduction