wear news vol fall 2010 - bud labs...astm g2 fall 2010 meeting, jacksonville, fl – december 7 –...

7
Page 1 WEAR NEWS Volume 8, Number 2 Fall 2010 Gordon Research Conference (GRC) The Gordon Research Conferences are held every two years and they are small groups (100-150) or researchers and students who gather to discuss current research issues and to possibly address as a group, issues that need to be resolved to move further in an area. The GRC on Tribology was held from June 27 to July 7, 2010 at Colby College in Waterville, Me. It was attended by about 130 people from many countries. There appeared to be more young researchers and students than “old” researchers and there appeared (to me) to be more physicists than any other technical persuasion. The theme of the conference was “Challenges at the Buried Interface.” The format for the conferences was: several invited lectures in the morning, free afternoons, and several invited lectures in the evening. There were about 80 posters in the break areas. Many researchers are using focused ion beam (FIB) sectioning tools to make cross-section slices transverse to wear scars and then analyzing these cross-sections with transition electron microscopy (TEM). There was lots of this at this GRC. Since the group was heavy in physicists, many presentations included molecular dynamics computer simulations of what happens at the atom and molecular level between sliding surfaces. There appeared to be varied opinions on what is the best fundamental quantum mechanic basis to use for these simulations. There seemed to be less biotribology than in other wear conferences, but one thing that was very evident was that the body joint wear/friction problem was still with us. Nobody agrees on what is the best couple to use: plastic on steel, plastic on ceramic, metal-on-metal. (I used to be a metal-to- metal person, but now I am swaying towards ceramic-to-plastic.) There was not much discussion on “industrial tribology”: abrasion, erosion, bearings, machining fluids, traction, gears, cams, etc. since most of the attendees were theoreticians and academicians. This has been the norm for the 12 or 14 GRC conferences that I have attended. However, we practitioners who attend always pick up some ideas of industrial use and keep abreast of what is happening at a higher level. Overall, this was a wonderful and refreshing conference. It was chaired by Mark Robbins of John Hopkins University and co chaired by Alfons Fischer, University Kharlstat Essen. William Unertle of the University of Maine chaired the poster sessions. Hopefully, these tribology “retreats” will continue and help bring together the diverse elements that constitute the field of tribology. Ohio State Nanoprobe Laboratory Professor Bharat Bhushan held this 17 th Nanotribology Short Course and Sponsors Meeting at the Ohio State University (OSU) Nanoprobe Laboratory for Bio and Nanotechnology and Biomemetics. The nature of Bharat’s work has changed over the years from research on magnetic media to research with the study of surfaces for applications ranging from face creams to automobile batteries (lithium ion). The Nanoprobe Lab uses scanning probe microscopes (STM, AFM’s) and nanoindentation and scratching instruments coupled with OSU’s

Upload: others

Post on 31-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Page 1

    WEAR NEWS Volume 8, Number 2 Fall 2010

    Gordon Research Conference (GRC)

    The Gordon Research Conferences are held every

    two years and they are small groups (100-150) or

    researchers and students who gather to discuss

    current research issues and to possibly address as a

    group, issues that need to be resolved to move

    further in an area. The GRC on Tribology was

    held from June 27 to July 7, 2010 at Colby College

    in Waterville, Me. It was attended by about 130

    people from many countries. There appeared to be

    more young researchers and students than “old”

    researchers and there appeared (to me) to be more

    physicists than any other technical persuasion.

    The theme of the conference was “Challenges at

    the Buried Interface.” The format for the

    conferences was: several invited lectures in the

    morning, free afternoons, and several invited

    lectures in the evening. There were about 80

    posters in the break areas. Many researchers are

    using focused ion beam (FIB) sectioning tools to

    make cross-section slices transverse to wear scars

    and then analyzing these cross-sections with

    transition electron microscopy (TEM). There was

    lots of this at this GRC. Since the group was

    heavy in physicists, many presentations included

    molecular dynamics computer simulations of what

    happens at the atom and molecular level between

    sliding surfaces. There appeared to be varied

    opinions on what is the best fundamental quantum

    mechanic basis to use for these simulations.

    There seemed to be less biotribology than in other

    wear conferences, but one thing that was very

    evident was that the body joint wear/friction

    problem was still with us. Nobody agrees on what

    is the best couple to use: plastic on steel, plastic on

    ceramic, metal-on-metal. (I used to be a metal-to-

    metal person, but now I am swaying towards

    ceramic-to-plastic.)

    There was not much discussion on “industrial

    tribology”: abrasion, erosion, bearings, machining

    fluids, traction, gears, cams, etc. since most of the

    attendees were theoreticians and academicians.

    This has been the norm for the 12 or 14 GRC

    conferences that I have attended. However, we

    practitioners who attend always pick up some ideas

    of industrial use and keep abreast of what is

    happening at a higher level.

    Overall, this was a wonderful and refreshing

    conference. It was chaired by Mark Robbins of

    John Hopkins University and co chaired by Alfons

    Fischer, University Kharlstat Essen. William

    Unertle of the University of Maine chaired the

    poster sessions. Hopefully, these tribology

    “retreats” will continue and help bring together the

    diverse elements that constitute the field of

    tribology.

    Ohio State Nanoprobe Laboratory

    Professor Bharat Bhushan held this 17th

    Nanotribology Short Course and Sponsors Meeting

    at the Ohio State University (OSU) Nanoprobe

    Laboratory for Bio and Nanotechnology and

    Biomemetics. The nature of Bharat’s work has

    changed over the years from research on magnetic

    media to research with the study of surfaces for

    applications ranging from face creams to

    automobile batteries (lithium ion).

    The Nanoprobe Lab uses scanning probe

    microscopes (STM, AFM’s) and nanoindentation

    and scratching instruments coupled with OSU’s

  • Page 2

    complete repertoire of surface science instruments

    to study how surfaces form and react to control

    various properties. For example, in current battery

    studies, they use AFM’s to measure physical

    changes to anode and cathode materials as they age

    (are used) and then use chemical analysis and other

    surface science technologies to explain the

    observed physical changes.

    In the area of biomenetrics, they are using the

    hydophobic surfaces on louts leaves to engineer

    self-cleaning surfaces for equipment and

    structures. They are copying shark skin to make

    surfaces with reduced fluid drag.

    They are still doing more traditional tribology

    work like lubrication of MEM’s and NEM’s and

    using AFM and other surface science techniques to

    investigate MEM and NEM problems like sticking

    of micromirrors in digital devices.

    Bharat’s annual review gives sponsors and

    industrial users of his technologies an opportunity

    to interact with the students and post-docs who

    perform the research in the OSU Nanotribology

    Lab. They are a unique facility and his lab

    continues to produce new learnings, publications,

    and patents relating to nanotechnology.

    TriboBr – The First International Brazilian

    Conference on Tribology

    This was a seminal event for Professor Daniel de

    Mello (UFU), ABM and Brazil. Professor de

    Mello organized the event. ABM, the

    metallurgical, materials, and Mining Society of

    Brazil sponsored the conference. There have been

    conferences going back to 1998 on tribology, but

    this was their first international project. There

    were many people helping Professor de Mello

    organize the event, and they made the conference

    special through invited speakers that included

    some of the “biggest” names in the business:

    Ali Erdimer (Keynote), Argonne National Lab

    (USA) -- “Innovative Design Concepts in Surface

    Engineering”

    Karl-Heinzzn ZumGarr, University of Karlsruhe

    (Germany) – “Advanced Materials and Surface

    Design for Tribocomponents.”

    Izhak Etsion, Technicion – Israel Institute of

    Technology (Israel) – “A Review of Laser Surface

    Texturing Applications.”

    Jean Michel Martin, Ecole Centrale de Lyon

    (France) – “Tribochemical Reactions Revisited.”

    Hugh Spikes, Imperial College, UK “Boundary

    Lubrication; History and Recent Developments.”

    Professor Ikemi, Tokyo City University (Japan) –

    “Recent Engine Tribological Investigations at

    Tokyo City University.”

    Maria Isabel de Barros Bouchet, Ecole Central de

    Lyon (France) – “Advanced Boundary Lubrication

    of Hard Carbon Coatings with Envoronmentally

    Friendly Additives”

    Ken Holmberg, VTT (Finland) – “Coated Surface

    Wear Prediction by Computer Modeling.”

    Professor Bronovets Morat Aleksandrovich,

    Russian Academy of Science (Russia) – “Space

    Tribology.”

    Professor Staffan Jacobson, Uppsala University

    (Sweden) – “Resistance to Abrasive Wear –

    Fundamental and Practical Aspects.”

    Professor John Williams, Cambridge University

    (UK) – “Tribology at a Small Scale: Learning

    from Nature.”

    The conference lasted for three days and it was

    held at the Rio Othon Palace Hotel on Cocacabana

    Beach in Rio de Janiero. There were 114 attendees

    from about 20 countries and 25 papers were

  • Page 3

    presented orally and another 20 or so were

    presented as posters. Session topics ranged from

    Biotribology Modeling and Simulation

    Fundamentals to Tribology in Rolling Mills and

    Manufacturing Processes. It was indeed refreshing

    to listen to excellent work on real tribology

    problems: cavitation erosion in turbines,

    hardfacings for communition equipment, railroad

    wear, grinding ball wear, pump seals, automatic

    transmissions, piston rings, gear wear, disk brakes,

    and plain bearings. Of course, there were plenty of

    talks on the vagaries and nuances of thin coatings,

    but there was a feeling that this conference was

    contributing to solving real industrial and

    economic problems as opposed to the usual

    offerings that are in many cases Ph.D. theses

    results.

    The conference was concluded by a presentation

    by the Chairman of ABM and he stated that Brazil

    is on track to become the number one exporter of

    petroleum in the world. Their economy (GNP)

    will grow by 7 ½ % this year. They will host the

    World Cup Competition in Soccer in 2014 and the

    Olympics in 2015. As a country, they plan to place

    10 million people in their “first home” and they

    have plans for significant improvements in their

    infrastructure. With 190 million people and oil

    wealth, Brazil is indeed a country on the move and

    this introduction of an international tribology effort

    was certainly in keeping with these plans. The

    organizers and ABM are to be congratulated on a

    great conference.

    ASTM G2 Fall 2010 Meeting, Jacksonville, FL –

    December 7 – 9

    Visit to the University of Florida Labs:

    The technical activity associated with the fall

    meeting of the ASTM G2 Committee in Wear and

    Erosion was a visit to Professor Greg Sawyer’s

    tribology lab at the University of Florida in

    Gainsville. Greg actually has seven labs in the

    mechanical engineering building and he showed a

    group of eight G2 attendees his equipment and

    gave us a snapshot of his project work.

    Greg has a number of Ph.D. and Master’s students

    that he supervises and project work centers on

    sliding surfaces together with techniques that allow

    all forces and environmental conditions to be

    known and recorded throughout a test. He also has

    the capability to measure and analyze films and

    transfer to rubbing surfaces with almost every

    analytical tool that is known (EDAX, XRF, SIMS,

    Raman, etc.). He even has real time analytical

    capability and is even working on syncotron

    techniques to look through solids in real time to

    assess wear happenings.

    Current projects include the wear properties of

    polymer-based nanocomposites, contact lens vs

    eye cells, and space tribology. Greg has six

    tribotesters on the international space station. Greg

    is tribology’s rock star. His equipment and staff

    may be without parallel in the US. It was a very

    informative and rewarding visit and Greg and his

    staff are to be complemented for the incredible

    work that they do in tribology.

    Friction Activities:

    The Fall 2010 meeting was chaired by Ken

    Budinski (Bud Labs). The status of the

    subcommittee’s standards was reviewed and it was

    determined that the G182 standard on breakaway

    friction of rolling element bearings will need

    balloting for reapproval in 2011. Ken Budinski

    will review the standard and make any necessary

    revisions.

    Greg Dalton reported that he has established a

    work item to develop a test method for measuring

    friction in the twist-compression galling test.

    Ken Budinski reported that he will prepare a non-

    mandatory appendix on the laws of friction for the

    G115 standard on friction testing and data

    interpretation. This addition will be balloted

    before the Spring 2011 meeting.

  • Page 4

    Non-abrasive Wear Activities:

    Chairman, Nick Randall, (CSM) reported that there

    are no current reapproval ballots on existing test

    methods.

    Greg Dalton (Tribosys) reported that a ballot on a

    new test method on the twist/compression test

    received a significant number of negatives and the

    standard was withdrawn to address the negatives.

    Ken Budinski reported on interlaboratory studies

    underway on ASTM G204 test on damage to solids

    under fretting condition. Results are in from three

    labs and more labs will be sought before a second

    round of tests is conducted.

    Mike Anderson (Falex) reported that he will ballot

    a draft of a new standard on a 3-pads on a disk test.

    He also has the responsibility for reapproval of the

    crossed cylinder test which was withdrawn because

    it was not reviewed and reballoted on schedule.

    Terminology Activities:

    Scott Hummel conducted the meeting for Chair

    Peter Blau (ORNL). He reported that the

    following terms received affirmative results and

    will go into ASTM G40 Terms:

    Average erosion rate

    Cavitation

    Flow cavitation

    Normal incubation time

    Normalized erosion resistance

    Normalized incubation resistance

    Micropitting

    Tribocorrosion

    Scott Hummel and Mike Anderson proposed a new

    definition for “wear.” They will ballot the new

    definition prior to the next meeting.

    Erosion Activities:

    Scott Hummel chaired the erosion subcommittee

    meeting and he reported that Frank Heymann is

    closing the task group on revision of the ASTM

    G32 vibratory horn cavitation test. The revised

    standard was balloted at the subcommittee level

    and will go to ballot at the committee level in the

    near future.

    Frank Heymann also submitted a report on

    reapproval or withdrawal of ASTM G134 test on

    “erosion of solid materials by a cavitating liquid

    het.” Frank located some users of this test and

    they expressed their desire to retain the test and

    perform the required interlaboratory tests.

    Professor Hitoshi Soyama (Tohoku University in

    Japan) will chair a task group to conduct the tests

    necessary to establish repeatability data.

    Jeff Smith (Consultant) reported that he has a task

    group working to develop a new test method for

    solid particle erosion testing of solids at elevated

    temperatures.

    Abrasion Activities:

    The Fall 2010 subcommittee meeting was chaired

    by Steve Shaffer (Battelle). He reported that the

    ASTM G65 dry sand rubber wheel abrasion test

    was successfully balloted for reapproval.

    Ken Budinski (Bud Labs) reported on activity on a

    revision of ASTM B611 high stress abrasion test.

    The test was written for cemented carbides, but the

    revised version will state that the test is applicable

    to other “hard materials” such as ceramics and

    cermets. The revision has been sent to the editorial

    subcommittee and will be balloted after their

    review. Ken Budinski will try to identify a suitable

    hard material for interlaboratory tests using the

    new method.

    Under new business, Ken Budinski reported that

    there is a current problem in obtaining test sand for

    ASTM G65. Troy LaValley (Falex) will

    investigate the sand problem as well as perceived

  • Page 5

    concerns about the D2 reference material used in

    the G65 test.

    Scott Hummel (Lafayette College) requested that

    the subcommittee revise the G65 standard to show

    Falex as the sole supplier of rubber wheels for the

    test.

    Data Acquisition Activities:

    Chair, Greg Dalton (Tribsys) reported that ASTM

    G190 Guide for Selection of Wear Tests is up for

    review and reballot. He will do the review and

    also enter a work item on wear condition

    monitoring.

    Miscellany:

    PV Design Mapping – Bob Clark and Bob Adam

    (Tribis) made a presentation to the G2 Committee

    at the Fall 2010 Jacksonville meeting on a new

    way to develop PV limits on plastics. Instead of

    running many tests at different loads with fixed

    velocity and many velocities with fixed loads, they

    developed a computer-controlled machine which

    will do these tests with one test couple. The wear

    and friction are continually monitored so when one

    PV is done, the machine simply does another on

    the same specimens. They did all of their work

    with plastic riders on a hard tool steel counterface

    which did not wear. The machine can do 100 PV

    tests in 48 hours.

    Next Workshop:

    Fretting wear and fretting corrosion was proposed

    as the next G2 workshop. Greg Dalton will decide

    on the time and venue

    Future G2 meetings:

    June 22-23, 2011, Baltimore, MD (with

    D2)

    December 7-8, 2011, New Orleans, LA

    (with D2)

    April 17-18, 2012, Georgia Tech (with

    Tribocorrosion Symposium)

    September 20-21, 2012, CSM Boston

    Future Conferences

    The appended list was prepared by Dr. Peter J.

    Blau of the Oak Ridge National Lab.

    NOTE: Wear News is the informal account of selected tribology events and the activities of the ASTM

    G2 Committee on Wear and Erosion.

    Contributed tribology articles are welcome.

    Send them and other inquiries to:

    Ken Budinski

    Bud Labs

    904 Ridge Road West

    Rochester, NY 14615 (USA)

  • Page 6

  • Page 7