watling - basic part 31 - michigan ltap

85
Floodplain Development

Upload: others

Post on 19-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Floodplain Development

Page 2: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 3: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Floodplain Regulations

Part 31 of Public Act 451

Building Codes, Zoning and Floodplain Management

Ordinances

National Flood Insurance Program

• State:

• Local:

Federal:

Page 4: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

What is a floodplain?

That area of land adjoining a river or stream that will be inundated by a 100-year flood

A flood with a magnitude which has a 1 % chance of occurring or being exceeded in a given year

Floodplain:

100-year flood:

Page 5: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Odds of winning a Big Game Jackpot:

Michigan Millions– Odds of Winning the Jackpot: – Overall odds to win:

What is a 1% Chance

1 in 76,275,360

1 in 5291 in 18,009,460

1 in 100Chance having of a flood within the100-year floodplain each year:

In a 30 year time period, a site located within the 100-year floodplain has over a 1 in 4

chance of being flooded

Page 6: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Identifying Floodplains in Mapped Areas

Many flood-prone communities belong to the National Flood Insurance Program, and have floodplains mapped on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM’s).

Page 7: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Identifying Floodplains in Unmapped Areas

The DEQ may be able to provide estimates of flood elevations on streams when floodplain maps do not exist.

Information, such as a cross section of the stream is sometimes necessary to perform this service

Page 8: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

SO, What does a floodplain look like anyway?

Page 9: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

City of Wakefield, 2002

Page 10: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Dead River Flooding, 2003

Page 11: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Great Lakes Flooding

Page 12: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Inland Lake Flooding-Mason County in 2008

Page 13: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Floodplain Levels on Inland Lakes

• Look for signs of fluctuating water levels.

• Look for control structures (dams)

• Ask the applicant and neighbors about past flooding.

Page 14: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

What if the new culvert is the lake level control structure?

• Need to maintain the same lake levels• Try to keep the invert of the new culvert the

same as the old• Work with the local lake association

Page 15: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Small streams and rivers

Page 16: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Floodplains on small streams

• Look for incised streams.

• Look at the stream crossings. What size? Plunge pools? High water marks?

• Ask the applicant and neighbors about past flooding.

Page 17: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

High Water Marks

Page 18: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Large rivers

Page 19: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Floodplains on large rivers

• Flood stages vary from 5 to 20 plus feet above normal water levels.

• Characterized by wide floodplains.

• Have a history of flooding.

Page 20: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

A Permit is required under Part 31 for the following

activities

• Any Occupation,

• Any Filling,

• Any Grade Changeswithin the floodplain of a river

Page 21: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Floodway vs. Floodway Fringe• The floodway is the river channel and the

portions of the floodplain that are reasonable required to carry and discharge a 100 year flood

Floodway

Floodway Fringe

Page 22: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Floodway

Floodway Fringe

Residential construction, including structural additions, is prohibited

within the Floodway

An engineering analysis may be required to show that proposed non-residential development will not restrict flood flow and cause a harmful increase in flood

elevations

• Areas of active flow

Page 23: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Development within the Floodway Fringe

Filling

Construction within the floodplain

Stream crossings

Page 24: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Hydrologic analysis of the watersheds that have been studied documents the cumulative impacts on a stream’s stage and discharge characteristics when floodplain storage is lost.

The cumulative loss of floodplain storage will ultimately increase flood discharges and thus cause an increase in flood stages.

Cut and Fill

Page 25: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 26: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Cut and Fill in Unstudied AreasCompensating cuts are required for volumes exceeding 300 cubic yards

Cuts should be provided on site at approximately the same elevations as the filled areas

A hydrologic analysis that shows no adverse affects to stage and discharge characteristic of the watercourse may be provided in lieu of cut and fill

-or-

Page 27: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Residential Construction

The lowest floor of residential structures must be elevated to prevent flood damage

Page 28: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Dead River Flooding, 2002

Page 29: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Part 31 Minor Projects

• Fill, grade changes or occupation of the floodway fringe

Floodway Fringe

Page 30: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

What’s that?

Page 31: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Harmful interference means:

Causing an increased stage or change in direction of flow that causes, or is likely to cause:1. Damage to property2. A threat to life3. A threat of personal injury4. Pollution, impairment, or destruction of

water or other natural resources.

Page 32: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Water lapping at the door

Page 33: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

High Velocities

Page 34: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 35: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Minor Projects

Bridges– Clear Span– Lowest bottom of beam at or

above the natural ground elevation on either bank

– approach fill sloping to natural ground elevations within 10 feet on either end of bridge

Approach fill 10’ or less

Bridge Clear Spans Channel.Lowest bottom of beam at or

above the natural ground

Page 36: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Clear Span Bridge

• PPerch River-Baraga County

Page 37: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Part 31 Minor Projects

Culverts– Effective Waterway Opening that

equals or exceeds the cross sectional area of the channel

– Not more than 1.5 feet of fill over culvert

– approach fill slopes to natural ground elevations within 10 feet of either side of the culvert

Approach fill 10’ or less

Culvert recessed andequals or exceeds

channel waterway area

1.5’ or Less

Page 38: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 39: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Ontonagon County, 2002

Page 40: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Marquette County, 2002

Page 41: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Part 31 Exemptions*• Watershed with a Drainage Area less than 2 square

miles• Bridge and culvert extensions up to 24 feet in length• Bridge deck replacements and road resurfacing• Some utility crossings• Most docks and stream bank protection projects that are

minor projects under Part 301• Excavating where materials are placed in an upland area

that is out of the floodplain

* These projects may require other federal, state or local permits

Page 42: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Permit Application Fees

• Minor Projects $100

• Major Projects $500

• Projects Requiring $1500 in an analysis addition to

application fee

Page 43: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Contact:

Sheila MeierDistrict Floodplain Engineer

906-346-8558

Page 44: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Jim Watling,PEEnvironmental Engineer

Page 45: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

. . . if there is any chance that your proposed structure would increase the flood elevations or water velocity compared to the existing conditions

• How do you know?

Page 46: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 47: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 48: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Flow AreaConsider the flood water flowing through the

structure and the water flowing around/over the structure. Weir flow is more efficient than flow through the structure.

Page 49: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Structural flow area If you are reducing the end area of the culvert or bridge then you will need to do a hydraulic analysis.

Page 50: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Changing the end area dimensions• If you are changing the span or rise of the

culvert or bridge then you may need to do a hydraulic analysis.

Existing Proposed

Page 51: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 52: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Weir FlowIf you are reducing weir flow (changing the low point in the road) a hydraulic analysis may be needed. You first need to determine if there is weir flow.

• Will all of the flow pass through the structure? Or will some of the flood flow pass over the road (weir flow)?

Page 53: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 54: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Friction lossesConsider the surface that the water passes through or over.

Going from metal to concrete will increase the friction loss.

A hydraulic analysis will be required.

Page 55: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Will the length of the culvert change?

- If you are replacing a culvert and increasing its length then a hydraulic analysis will be required

- Exception: if you are extending an existing culvert/bridge by 24 feet or less then a hydraulic analysis is not required

Page 56: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Slope

Are the proposed inverts different?

Page 57: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 58: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Is there a change in the entrance design?– Headwalls (best), Mitered, Projecting (worse)

Page 59: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

A reduction in flow areaAn change in road elevationA change in material typeA change in slopeA longer culvert or wider bridgeA change in the entry type

you may need to do a hydraulic analysis

Page 60: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 61: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 62: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 63: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 64: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Jim WatlingTransportation and Flood Hazard Unit

Contact:517-335-3187

[email protected]

Page 65: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Hydraulic Design and Report

You have determined that a hydraulic analysis is needed. What is

the next step?

Minmin Shu, Environmental Engineer

Page 66: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

• Site location• Design flow• Field inspection and survey• Preliminary design of road and structure* • Conduct the hydraulic computation for both

existing and proposed conditions, compare the results, refine the proposed design.

• Summarize the conditions and the findings into the hydraulic report.

Page 67: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Location Map

• Identify Site Location

• County, Township names

• Town/Range, Section

• Road name and stream name at the crossing

• Mark the flow direction

• USGS quad map is preferred

Page 68: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

• www.michigan.gov/deqhydrology, Turn around time approximately 30 days.

• You will be provided the drainage area and the flows you selected

• If the drainage area is under 2 square miles then a hydraulic analysis is not required under Part 31, although you still have the liability.

Submit a Discharge Request to the DEQ-HSU

Page 69: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Field Inspection and Survey• Road profile• Existing structure type and dimensions

invert and low steel elevation, entrance type• Average stream width at OHWM and

bankfull width• Obtain cross section(s) of the stream and

overbank areaHY-8: need 1 representative downstream cross section HEC-RAS: At least 2 cross sections upstream and 2 cross sections downstream

Page 70: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Field Inspection and Survey Continued

• Obtain distances between the cross sections and your structure

• Estimate the N values for the channel and overbank areas.

• Field pictures

Page 71: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Field Pictures

Page 72: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 73: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 74: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 75: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Road at Structure Vicinity Area

Page 76: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP
Page 77: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Options for Hydraulic Calculations

• Hand Calculation • Chart: Federal Highway Administration,

Hydraulic Design of Culvert, Series No.5

• HY8: Culvert Analysis.• HEC-RAS, River Analysis System.

Page 78: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

• HY-8 Version 7.2 Build Date July 28, 2011

• Federal Highway Administration

• http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/software/hy8/index.cfm

See special PowerPoint presentation for details

Page 79: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

• To download HEC-RAS, go to the US Army Corps of Engineers web site. (Search HEC-RAS).

• See special PowerPoint PresentationHEC-RAS: 10 Steps

This presentation introducesyou to the model and will help you get familiar with HEC-RAS.

HEC-RAS, River Analysis System

Page 80: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Hydraulic Report Requirementswww.michigan.gov/deqtransportationreview then click on hydraulic report guidelines.

See handout: Hydraulic Report Example

• Conduct your analysis comparing existing and proposed conditions.

• Submit your findings-briefly discuss, method of analysis, assumptions, and conclusions

Page 81: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Engineer Certification and Affected Property Owner Statement

If the hydraulic calculations show an increase in the energy grade line elevation, one or both above documents are required

Page 82: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

- If the flood elevation increase is limited in the applicant’s property, or the increase is beyond the applicant property but is below the stream bank, the design engineer (P.E.) must sign and submit a certification of “no harmful interference”.

- Sample certification language can be found at www.michigan.gov/deqtransportationreview then click on hydraulic report guidelines.

Page 83: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

- If the flood elevation increase is 0.01 feet or greater, is over the bank and goes beyond the applicant’s property, the design engineer (P.E.) must sign and submit a certification of “no harmful interference”.

- In addition, copies of the “Affected Property Owner Statement”, must be sent to all property owners impacted for the proposed increase.

- Sample statements can also be found at www.michigan.gov/deqtransportationreview, then click on hydraulic report guidelines.

Page 84: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Final Product for Part 31 Review

• For preliminary hydraulic reviewElectronic file of the computer modelHydraulic report

• For permit applicationElectronic file of the computer modelHydraulic reportFill out the permit application form, especially section 14Engineer Certification and Affected Property Owner Statement if they are needed

Page 85: Watling - Basic Part 31 - Michigan LTAP

Minmin ShuTransportation and Flood Hazard Unit

Contact:517-241-8129

[email protected]