watermark westquay southampton - iema - home · 2018-07-20 · watermark westquay, southampton non...
TRANSCRIPT
Watermark WestQuay Southampton
for
Coordinated by
Barton Willmore LLP
enviRonmental Statement non-technical SummaRy
FebRuaRy 2013
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton
Environmental Statement
Non-Technical Summary
Issue/Revision Draft Final Date 22/02/2013 27/02/3013 Prepared by
Project Team Project Team
Checked by
Barton Willmore Barton Willmore
Project Reference 19314/A5/EIA/NTS Barton Willmore 7 Soho Square, London, W1D 3QD Tel: 0207 446 6888 Our Ref: 19314/A5/ES NTS FINAL Date: February 2013 COPYRIGHT The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of Barton Willmore LLP.
All Barton Willmore stationery is produced using recycled or FSC paper and vegetable oil based inks.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 1 February 2013
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Hammerson UK Properties Plc (the “Applicant”) is seeking outline planning permission to
provide a mixed use development including Class D2 leisure uses (including a cinema), Class
A1-A5 retail uses, Class C1 hotel use, Class C3 residential use, and Class B1(a) office use
along with car parking, access, highways, landscaping and public open space (collectively
referred to hereafter as the “Proposed Development”).
1.2 The Proposed Development will be located in Southampton on land between Harbour Parade
and Portland Terrace to the south of the existing WestQuay Shopping Centre (WQSC) (the
“Application Site”). The location and extent of the Application Site is shown on Figures 1.1
and 1.2. The Application Site is situated within the administrative areas of Southampton City
Council (SCC).
1.3 This report provides a non-technical summary (NTS) of the Environmental Statement (ES)
prepared to accompany the planning application. The ES presents the findings of an
Environmental Impact Assessment1 (EIA) undertaken in support of the planning application.
1.4 The full findings of the ES are presented in a comprehensive set of documents that can be
viewed at Southampton City Council, Civic Centre, One Guildhall Square, Southampton, SO14
7FP. Additional copies of the NTS (no charge), ES (£70 plus postage) and the Technical
Appendices (£180 plus postage) are available from Paul Newton, Barton Willmore LLP, 7 Soho
Square, London, W1D 3QB. The complete ES can also be obtained on CD for £20 (plus
postage) from the same address.
The Application Site
1.5 The Application Site, 4.27 hectares (ha) in area and shown on Figures 1.1 and 1.2, is
bordered: to the west by Harbour Parade; to the south by the Quays Swimming and Diving
Complex (QSDC); to the east by the historic and nationally important Town Walls; and to the
north and partly incorporated into the Application Site, WQSC. The Application Site is
located on land which was originally reclaimed from the River Test during the industrial
expansion of Southampton in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Application Site was
formerly occupied by warehouses belonging to the Pirelli Cable Works. The Pirelli Works
closed in 1990 and the main part of the Application Site was virtually empty in June 1995.
1.6 The majority of the Application Site is presently vacant and consists predominantly of large
areas of hardstanding. It also includes the existing external terrace and part of WQSC and its
car park (including the existing footbridge link); part of the QSDC car park; a portion of the
1 Prepared in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 2 February 2013
Western Esplanade road and footpath; an area of car parking off Castle Way and Albion Place
above the Town Walls; and a portion of Portland Terrace and Bargate Street including the
pedestrian subway. In recent years, part of the Application Site has been used once a year
by the organisers of the Southampton Boat Show and for informal parking.
1.7 The Application Site is easily accessed by pedestrians from both Harbour Parade and Western
Esplanade with wide footways located along either side of both carriageways. Public
transport to the Application Site is available via the bus stop interchange on Portland
Terrace. Bus stops are also positioned on Castle Way to the east. Southampton Central Train
Station is located approximately 850m to the north of the Application Site. The roads
surrounding the Application Site provide good access to the wider highway network.
1.8 There are no landscape or ecological designations within the Application Site. However the
Application Site contains a section of the medieval Town Walls which are designated as a
Scheduled Monument2 and a Grade I Listed3 Building. In addition, Western Esplanade, and
the access ramps and steps to the existing WQSC, as well as the car parks within the north-
east area of the Application Site, are within the Old Town West Conservation Area4 (OTWCA).
1.9 Given the nature of previous land uses, including the Pirelli Cable Works, it is anticipated
that there could be some localised contamination sources present on the Application Site. An
electricity sub-station adjacent to the western boundary also represents a potential source of
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) contamination. In addition, the Application Site was subject
to heavy bomb damage during World War II and as a result, it is considered there could be a
risk from unexploded bombs.
1.10 The majority of the Application Site is located in an area at low risk of flooding, with the
exception of the far north-west corner which is at medium risk. The River Test is located
approximately 400m to the south of the Application Site and the River Itchen approximately
1.3km to the east. In addition the Application Site is underlain by secondary aquifers.
2 A Scheduled Monument is a building included in the Schedule of Monuments compiled under Section 1 of the Ancient Monuments, and Archaeological Area Act 1979. Scheduled Monuments have statutory protection under this Act (Section 2). 3 Grade I buildings are considered to be of exceptional historical and/or architectural interest and are sometimes internationally important 4 A Conservation Area is an area of special environmental or historical importance that is protected from changes by law.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 3 February 2013
2.0 EIA METHODOLOGY
Assessment Methodology
2.1 EIA is a systematic procedure that uses best practicable techniques and available sources of
information to determine the potential environmental effects (beneficial, adverse, negligible,
temporary, permanent, direct, indirect, cumulative and interactive) of a development. This
enables the importance of predicted effects to be considered by a local planning authority (in
this case SCC) before a decision is made about the planning application. The prediction of
such effects for the Proposed Development was made in relation to both the construction
activities and the operational phase of the Proposed Development i.e. when complete and
occupied.
2.2 Within the ES the significance of an environmental effect has been identified. The
significance reflects the relationship between:
• The sensitivity, importance or value of the affected resource or 'receptor' (such as people
or wildlife); and
• The actual change taking place to the environment (i.e. the 'magnitude' or severity of an
effect).
2.3 The three levels of significance defined are:
• Major – an effect which, on its own, could have an influence on the decision making
process;
• Moderate – an effect which, on its own, could have some influence on decision making,
particularly when combined with other similar effects; or
• Minor – an effect which, on its own, is likely to have a minor influence on decision
making but when combined with other effects could have greater influence.
2.4 Table 1 shows the relationship between the value of the receptor and the magnitude of an
effect used to determine the significance of an effect.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 4 February 2013
Table 1: Significance Matrix
Magnitude of Effect Sensitivity/Value of Receptor High Medium Low
High (England, UK, International) Major Major/ Moderate Moderate
Medium (County, Regional) Major/ Moderate Moderate Moderate/ Minor
Low (Local, District) Moderate Moderate/ Minor Minor
2.5 Effects are also described as:
• Adverse i.e. detrimental or negative effects to an environmental resource or receptor; or
• Beneficial i.e. advantageous or positive effect to an environmental resource or receptor.
2.6 Where an effect is considered to be not significant or have no influence, irrespective of other
effects, it is classified as “negligible”.
Cumulative Effects
2.7 Within EIA, the cumulative effects of a development in conjunction with other consented but
not yet built development in the area are considered. Cumulative effects are generally
considered to arise from the combination of effects from the Proposed Development and from
other proposed or permitted schemes in the vicinity. The following cumulative schemes are
considered in the ES and are shown on Figure 2.1:
• Northern Above Bar (Former Tyrell & Green Store) Redevelopment
(07/01686/FUL): Demolition of the existing building and erection of new buildings ranging
in height from 9-storeys to 18-storeys to provide new arts facilities, a new commercial
unit (Class A1/A3) and 282 flats (46 studios, 106x1 bedroom, 126x2 bedroom and 4x3
bedroom flats) with associated parking and formation of a new street between Guildhall
Square and East/Andrews Park;
• Car Park next to Saxon Gate, Back of the Walls, Bargate (07/00755/FUL and
11/00339/Time): Redevelopment of the site including the erection of 5 and 6 storey
buildings to provide 178 student housing flats with associated parking and 36 separate
public car parking spaces with vehicular access from Canal Walk;
• Former C and A Building 129-139 Above Bar Street, 1 West Marlands Road and
1-5 Gibbs Road Southampton, SO14 7FQ (08/00474/FUL); Redevelopment of the site
including erection of a 6 storey building with basement parking to provide offices (Use
Class B1 – 7,365 square metres floorspace) with retail, restaurant/cafes (Use Classes
A1/A3) and a one stop shop customer service centre on the ground floor with vehicular
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 5 February 2013
access from Above Bar Street following the demolition of the existing buildings;
• 64-71 St Andrews Road, Ambulance Station, Central Health Clinic East Park
Terrace & Adjoining Highways Southampton (06/01457/FUL and 08/00635/VC):
Demolition of the existing buildings. Redevelopment of the site to provide four buildings:
a 21-storey hotel (Class C1); an 11-storey ‘apart-hotel’ (Class C1) which includes 4 flats
(Class C3); a 14-storey block of 219 flats (Class C3); and a 12 storey office building
(Class B1) of 8,996 square metres gross floorspace; with associated environmental
improvements, parking and servicing involving alterations to the highways in St Andrews
Road; and
• Admirals Quay, Ocean Way, Southampton (11/01555/FUL): Redevelopment of the
site involving the erection of three buildings of 9-storeys, 16 storeys and 26 storeys to
provide 299 flats (37 x 1 bedroom, 225 x 2 bedrooms and 37 x 3 bedroom) and 2764
square metres of commercial floorspace, comprising retail (Class A1 and/or
cafes/restaurants (Class A3) and/or drinking establishments (Class A4) with associated
storage and parking.
Determining the Content of the ES
2.8 ‘Scoping'5 involves focusing the study (and hence the ES) of environmental issues of potential
significance. The scope (content) of the ES was established by the project team at the start
of the EIA process. A request for a Scoping Opinion was originally sent to SCC on the 13th
November 2012. The topics set out in the scoping report comprised:
• Socio Economics;
• Transport and Access;
• Ecology;
• Landscape and Visual (including consideration of Arboriculture);
• Daylight, Sunlight and Overshadowing;
• Noise and Vibration;
• Air Quality;
• Water Resources and Flood Risk;
• Ground Conditions;
• Wind Microclimate;
• Archaeology;
• Built Heritage; and
• Waste.
5 A Scoping Opinion is a written statement of the local authority’s opinion as to the information to be provided in the ES, in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 2011.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 6 February 2013
2.9 SCC adopted a Scoping Opinion on 25th January 2013 which generally agreed with the scope
of the topics set out above.
Consultation Process
2.10 As part of the design of the Proposed Development consultation has been undertaken with
the local community and key stakeholders including: SCC, Environment Agency, Natural
England; English Heritage; Southern Water; and BAA. The Applicant also held a public
exhibition in December 2012 at WQSC. The public exhibition provided an opportunity to
inform local residents and these organisations of the progress with the Proposed
Development and allow the local residents to feed back their comments on the proposals.
Involvement with the local community will continue throughout the planning process and into
the construction phase of the Proposed Development.
3.0 ALTERNATIVES
3.1 The EIA Regulations6 require that an applicant provides an outline of the main alternatives
considered. The Applicant has considered a number of alternative designs for the Proposed
Development following identification of the constraints and opportunities on the Application
Site. The layout and design of the Proposed Development has been informed by: the
considerations and constraints within the Application Site; the key design principles
necessary to ensure the vision for the Proposed Development is achieved; and feedback from
the public exhibition.
4.0 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
4.1 The description of the Proposed Development is set out below:
"Mixed-use development including alterations to the WestQuay Shopping Centre comprising Leisure uses including a Cinema (Use Class D2), Retail (Use Classes A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5), Hotel (Use Class C1), Residential (Use Class C3), Office (Use Class B1(a)), public open space, with associated car parking, access, highway, landscaping and other works".
4.2 Development parameters have been established for the entire Application Site7. These set
out details of the limits, necessary to define and fix those aspects of the Proposed
Development capable of having significant environmental effects, as defined in the EIA
6 The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 7 Parameter plans are a series of drawings that set the types of land use, the heights of the future buildings, main points of access, and landscaping proposals. They do not show individual buildings, roads, or planning but set out where the key parts of a development will be located on a site.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 7 February 2013
Regulations. These limits or development parameters are shown on Figures 4.1 to 4.10
and described below.
Built Form
4.3 The Proposed Development has been divided into four ‘Development Zones’ (DZ1-DZ4) for
the purposes of identifying distinct development areas within the Proposed Development,
which have different building envelopes, uses, areas and heights. The footprint of each
building and type of development including maximum and minimum lines of deviation are
illustrated on Figures 4.4 to 4.8. The extent of each DZ is identified on Figure 4.1 and
the main land use elements are set out in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Land Use Elements of the Proposed Development
Floor Space Design Zone (DZ)
Land Use
Maximum Minimum
Car Parking Spaces
Retail-Restaurant (A1-A5)
15,000 4,000 DZ1
Leisure (including cinema) (D2)
15,000 6,000
DZ2 Retail Kiosks (A1-A5) 1,000 0
0
Retail-Restaurant (A1-A5)
2,500 0
Office (B1(a)) 10,000 0 Hotel (C1) 28,000 0 Residential (C3) (Units)
28,000 (360)
0 (0)
DZ3
Leisure (D2) 2,500 0 Retail-Restaurant (A1-A5)
1,000 0
Residential (C3) (units)
20,000 (260)
11,000 (140)
DZ4
Leisure (D2) 2,000 0
140-250
4.4 The Proposed Development will be delivered in two phases. DZ1 and parts of DZ2 will come
forward as part of Phase One of the Proposed Development. DZ3, DZ4 and the remaining
areas of DZ2 will come forward as part of Phase Two. The Proposed Development elements
are described in detail below under each DZ of the Application Site.
Phase One
DZ1
4.5 DZ1 is positioned in the northern portion of the Application Site abutting WQSC (see Figure
4.1) with the Town Walls to the east (at a minimum distance of 20m). DZ1 includes a main
building with retail, leisure, cafe and restaurant uses along with a cinema. DZ1 will contain
the proposed service yard access to the Proposed Development (from Harbour Parade) and
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 8 February 2013
pedestrian access to the multi-storey car park via a new link footbridge. The building is
designed with flexibility to respond to operator demand.
4.6 The cinema element is the main leisure anchor of the Proposed Development and represents
a key visual landmark due to its design and position opposite the Plaza and Town Walls.
Commercial units, designed to primarily include restaurants, cafes and bars will be provided
on various levels facing towards the pedestrian ramps and Western Esplanade. A large retail
unit (Class A1) will be provided at ground floor level fronting onto Harbour Parade. It is
envisaged that this will be occupied by a Supermarket or national multiple retailer.
4.7 Service access to the building is provided from a dedicated route off Harbour Parade, with all
servicing to individual units to be undertaken internally from the internal core connecting to
the service yard.
4.8 DZ1 includes a number of open spaces including an area on promenade level towards the
Plaza and an area of public realm on the southern edge linking the Plaza to Harbour Parade.
Terraced areas will also be created at the upper levels associated with the cinema.
DZ2 (Phase One element)
4.9 DZ2 will deliver substantial areas of public realm. This includes the main Plaza and the
Esplanade alongside the Town Walls to the east, the Pocket-Park to the north of the QSDC
and the landscaped public realm above the Town Walls off Albion Place adjacent to Catchcold
Tower. DZ2 will also provide up to 1,000 sqm GIA for ‘retail kiosks’ proposed to be used on
temporary and/or permanent basis.
4.10 The main Plaza and the Esplanade positioned on the north-eastern part of the Applicaiton
Site will come forward as part of Phase One. They represent a key component of the
Proposed Development as it is a significant area of public open space and will form a new
pedestrian link between Bargate Street and Western Esplanade. This will significantly
enhance pedestrian linkage between the City Centre and the waterfront to the south. DZ2 as
a whole also contains accessible pedestrian linkage between the Plaza and the QSDC and the
access road to the car park from Harbour Parade. Vehicles access will only be occasional in
order to cater primarily for the staging of event and to allow access for emergency vehicles.
The proposed access is shown on Figure 4.10.
4.11 The configuration and extent of the Plaza has been designed in order to relate sensitively to
the setting of the Town Walls. The area varies in width (east-west) from a minimum of 20m
at its narrowest point to 42m between the main leisure/cinema building and commercial units
and the Town Walls (ensuring a significant buffer and appropriate setting to the Town
Walls).
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 9 February 2013
4.12 There will be active frontages onto the Plaza and Esplanade from DZ1, DZ3 and DZ4. The
Plaza has been designed to cater for a number of different uses and events including outdoor
dining, outdoor events and leisure associated with the use of the Proposed Development and
the City Centre. The majority of the area will be hardscaped.
Phase Two
DZ3
4.13 DZ3 is positioned in the central portion of the Application Site fronting the Town Walls to the
east and residential tower (DZ4) immediately to the west. DZ1 is to the north and DZ2 is to
the south and east as shown in Figure 4.1.
4.14 DZ3 will contain a variety of uses including hotel, restaurant, retail, office and residential
uses. It will also contain replacement and other additional car parking and associated
service yards. It has been designed with flexibility to incorporate or omit the various uses at
the detailed design stage (dependent on user demand). This element will comprise separate
building blocks around a unifying area of public realm. The servicing of the buildings will via
Harbour Parade roundabout access road or Western Esplanade.
4.15 DZ3 includes two levels of car parking providing between 140-250 spaces. The ground level
car park will replicate the spaces lost from the SCC owned car park adjacent to the QSDC
which will be removed as part of the Proposed Development. The second level is provided
for the occupants of the residential tower located in DZ4. The car park will be accessed from
the existing access road linked to the Harbour Parade roundabout.
DZ4
4.16 DZ4 is positioned on the south-western corner of the Proposed Development fronting the
QSDC to the south and Harbour Parade immediately to the west. DZ1 is to the north and
DZ3 to the east.
4.17 DZ4 contains the residential tower building which is intended to become a key visual
landmark for the Proposed Development and Southampton City Centre. The building has
been positioned in the least sensitive part of the Application Site away from the Town Walls
and has been orientated to maximise views to the waterfront.
4.18 The tower building will provide residential uses as well as some commercial floorspace which
will include leisure and/or retail uses. There will be between 140 to 260 residential units
with a range of studios, 1, 2 and 3 bedroom units.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 10 February 2013
4.19 There is no dedicated parking within DZ4. Car parking for residents will be provided in the
second level of the DZ3 car park. There will be a direct internal link between this area and
the building for residents. Service access to the building is provided from a dedicated route
off Harbour Parade. The building is proposed to be set back from the street edge which will
allow the provision of an area of open space along Harbour Parade on its western edge.
DZ2 (Phase Two element)
4.20 The Phase Two elements of DZ2 include the Pocket-Park to the north of the QSDC and the
landscaped public realm above the Town Walls off Albion Place adjacent to Catchcold Tower.
4.21 The Pocket-Park represents a dedicated area of open space consisting of hard surfacing and
green landscaping and is positioned on the southern part of the Application Site immediately
to the south of DZ3. The configuration and extent of the Park has been designed in order to
integrate the disabled access ramp to the QSDC into the primary circulation route of the
Proposed Development and provide enhanced green space within the Proposed Development.
4.22 The landscaped public realm above the Town Walls ‘Albion Gardens’ will be designed to
accentuate the Town Walls and Catchcold Tower. Albion Garden will be designed based on
the quilt pattern of the historic garden which was formerly located here.
4.23 The elevated location of Albion Garden at the level of the Old Town will allow for views
across the Plaza below.
Building Heights
4.24 The maximum and minimum building heights within each DZ are illustrated on Figure 4.9.
Table 4.2 breaks down the maximum heights by DZ.
Table 4.2: Maximum Heights by DZ
DZ Maximum Heights AOD (m)
DZ1
+36.5
DZ2
N/A
DZ3
+36
DZ4
+95
Notes: 1. AOD is defined as Above Ordnance Datum 2. Heights of buildings to be measured from the level of the ground floor slab to the apex of the roof (not including plant). 3. The DZs referred to are identified on Figure 4.9 Building Heights
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 11 February 2013
Access
4.25 The locations of the access points into the Proposed Development are shown on Figure
4.10. The majority of vehicles will access the Application Site from Harbour Parade and the
A33 West Quay Road/Town Quay corridor. Car parking will be available in existing surface
level and multi-storey car parks with high level pedestrian bridge links.
4.26 Public transport to the Application Site will be available via the bus stop interchange on
Portland Terrace. Bus stops are also positioned on Castle Way to the east.
Construction Programme
4.27 Construction will commence in 2013/2014 with Phase One (subject to gaining planning
permission) which is expected to be completed by 2016. Phase Two will be brought forward
in response to active market demand, but is anticipated to be completed by 2019. Figure
4.11 shows the anticipated phasing for the Proposed Development.
4.28 A Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) will be prepared for the Proposed
Development that will provide the methods of managing environmental issues for all involved
with the construction activities.
4.29 It is anticipated that SCC will wish to regulate the hours of work on the Application Site. It is
anticipated that these will be 08:00 to 18:00 Monday to Friday and 08:00 to 13:00 on
Saturdays. All work outside these hours will be subject to prior agreement, and/or reasonable
notice, by SCC, who may impose certain restrictions. Night time working will be with the
agreement of SCC and restricted to exceptional circumstances.
5.0 SOCIO ECONOMICS
5.1 The ES includes an assessment of the effects of the Proposed Development on socio
economics in proximity to the Application Site during construction and operation.
5.2 During construction of Phase One it is anticipated that approximately 600 full, part-time and
temporary jobs will be generated by the construction of the Proposed Development. These
will be supplemented with further indirect employment that may be generated due to
requirements for building materials, plan, plant maintenance etc. during the build period.
Local services such as restaurants, cafes, shops, petrol stations etc are also likely to
experience a temporary boost through the provision of meals, refreshments and fuel to the
workforce. This will result in temporary effects of moderate beneficial significance.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 12 February 2013
5.3 During operation of Phase One it is anticipated that a maximum of 500 full and part time jobs
will be created. The increased job creation and consequently income will lead to wider spin-
off benefits for local shops, businesses and services primarily in Southampton. This will
result in a long-term effect of major beneficial significance.
5.4 Phase One will provide space for retail and restaurants catering largely for retailers and
restaurant/leisure operators not present in the City Centre and WQSC which will complement
the existing offer and ensure only positive effects on the trading conditions and health of
wider parts of the City Centre. The effects will be long-term and of moderate beneficial
significance.
5.5 Phase One also represents a significant opportunity to promote accessibility and enhance
social inclusion in the area around the Application Site and City Centre. The Proposed
Development will be accessible and inclusive to all elements of the population who will be
able to access the completed retail and leisure facilities; use and enjoy areas of new public
open space; appreciate the City’s heritage assets through enhanced access to the Town
Walls; and improve pedestrian accessibility between the City Centre and Waterfront.
5.6 The mix of uses within the Proposed Development including shopfronts which will be active
during day and night time hours. This will offer a significantly enhanced degree of natural
surveillance which is currently lacking in the area around the Application Site. This will
result in a long-term effect of moderate beneficial significance.
5.7 During operation of Phase One and construction of Phase Two there will be further 600 job
opportunities associated with the construction activities while the benefits associated with
the operation of Phase One will also continue.
5.8 During the Completed Development in addition to the effects described above for the
operation of Phase One there will be long term effects of moderate beneficial significance
associated with the provision of residential units in the form of a range of studio, 1, 2 and 3
bedroom units providing accommodation for up to 937 people by completion and contributing
to housing needs established by planning policy. The provision of the hotel will create a
long-term effect of minor beneficial significance. There will also be the creation of an
additional 883 jobs associated with the increase in retail and office accommodation providing
a moderate beneficial effects
5.9 However with the increase in population there will be additional school aged children
generated by the residential components of the Proposed Development leading to a long-
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 13 February 2013
term effect of minor adverse significance on education facilities. There will also be a long-
term effect of minor adverse significance on health facilities associated with the rise in
population.
5.10 The Proposed Development in combination with the cumulative development schemes
discussed above will result in cumulative effects of: major beneficial significance in terms of
employment and job creation; moderate beneficial significance in terms of population,
housing, retail, hotel, leisure and office; negligible significance in terms of leisure provision,
community and recreation facilities and minor adverse significance in terms of education and
health facilities.
6.0 TRANSPORT AND ACCESS
6.1 The ES includes an assessment of the transport effects of the Proposed Development. The
Application Site is well located in terms of accessibility by public transport, walking and
cycling, which is in accordance with the general aims of National Planning Policy Guidance
and is close to other amenities and services which will enable one trip to support multiple
purposes.
6.2 Construction traffic effects resulting from HGVs and other vehicles associated with
construction accessing the Application Site will be mitigated by appropriate planning and
management resulting in negligible effects.
6.3 During operation of Phases One and Two, walking and cycling trips in the local area are
expected to increase as a result of the Proposed Development. New routes and connections,
improved public realm and cycle parking facilities will be provided to support the use of these
modes. The residual effect of the overall development on walking is considered to be
moderate beneficial and on cycling it is considered to be negligible. Use of these modes will
also be supported by travel planning measures at the Proposed Development.
6.4 The Proposed Development is located in the city centre close to numerous and frequent
public transport services. It is considered that the existing public transport services have
adequate capacity to accommodate the increase in passenger demand and that the overall
residual effect of the Proposed Development on public transport is negligible.
6.5 The Proposed Development will increase traffic on the local highway network. Most of the
Proposed Development traffic is expected to use the A33 West Quay Road / Town Quay
corridor to access the Application Site. The effect of the traffic increase would be mitigated
by optimising the traffic signal timings on the A33 corridor near the Application Site to take
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 14 February 2013
account of the change in traffic demand arising from the Proposed Development. Travel
planning at the Application Site will help mitigate the effects of the Proposed Development
on the local transport network and to support use of non-car travel modes. This will result in
negligible effects to the highway network apart from at one junction (Eastern Harbour
Parade/West Quay Road junction) which will experience a long term moderate adverse effect.
6.6 The Proposed Development proposes a restrained level of car parking for its new land uses
and will facilitate the use of existing under-utilised parking capacity, particularly in the West
Quay Multi-Storey car park. The proposed parking and servicing provision is considered
suitable for the size of development proposed resulting in a negligible effect.
6.7 It was agreed with SCC that due to a combination of factors including the distance from the
Application Site and minimal parking provision, that consideration of cumulative effects was
not necessary for transport assessment purposes.
6.8 The development proposals accord with the relevant national, regional and local
transportation policies.
7.0 ECOLOGY AND NATURE CONSERVATION
7.1 The Application Site is currently of limited ecological interest with amenity grassland and
areas of hard standing on the Application Site having no ecological interest and no potential
to support protected species. However, trees and ornamental planting provide some
opportunities for common bird and invertebrate species. Castle Bailey Wall is considered to
have low bat roosting potential, as a precautionary measure only.
7.2 The Proposed Development abides by the principles laid out in national, regional and local
planning policies.
7.3 There is the potential for some minor adverse effects upon ecological receptors during
construction of Phase One and Phase Two, although the majority of effects are negligible.
Similarly, there is the potential for some minor beneficial ecological effects to arise as a
result of the Completed Development. The ecological value of the Application Site could be
enhanced as a result of the Completed Development with the provision of ecological
enhancement measures such as the provision of suitable nesting opportunities for birds,
roosting opportunities for bats and foraging habitat for invertebrates, birds and bats.
7.4 There would be no significant adverse effects upon designated sites as a result of the
Proposed Development or any adverse effects in combination with other consented schemes
considered as part of the cumulative assessment.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 15 February 2013
8.0 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL
8.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on the
landscape and views to and from the Application Site for the construction and Completed
Development phases. To inform the assessment, an appraisal of the current townscape and
visual amenity of the Assessment Site and its surroundings was undertaken.
8.2 Some temporary major adverse effects are expected during construction. The main receptors
identified experiencing these effects are the character area around the walls (CA11) and
views from the Catchcold and Arundel Towers. The effects are considered to be major
adverse due to the proximity to the Application Site, the sensitive nature of the receptors
and the magnitude of change to the views.
8.3 Whilst inevitably losing some views of the Town Walls, and some views of the waterfront
from Arundel Tower, the Completed Development will generally have minor beneficial effects
for the majority of views and character areas. The maximum and minimum parameters have
been assessed. In some close range views, the Proposed Development close to the minimum
parameters would benefit the views. Conversely, from some longer distance views, the
Proposed Development could benefit from achieving closer to the maximum height
parameters in order to create a new iconic landmark for Southampton.
8.4 Small numbers of properties on Forest View will experience moderate to major adverse
effects during operation of Phase One and the operation of the Completed Development.
These properties are located at the top of the Town Walls with clear views towards the
Application Site and out towards the waterfront. These views will be limited particularly by
the maximum parameters of Phase Two. Views from the top of the Town Walls will also
experience major to moderate adverse effects during the operation of the Completed
Development for the maximum parameters.
8.5 The mitigation measures inherent with the Design Principles of the Proposed Development
will minimise the adverse effects on the sensitive Town Walls and adjacent Conservation
Areas: Old Town West Conservation Area and Old Town North Conservation Area. The
Proposed Development will contribute vitality and a 'sense of place' to what is currently a
fragmented character area, west of the City Centre.
8.6 There are no foreseeable cumulative effects associated with the Application Site in relation to
other development schemes in the area.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 16 February 2013
9.0 DAYLIGHT, SUNLIGHT, OVERSHADOWING AND SOLAR GLARE
9.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on daylight,
sunlight, overshadowing and solar glare for the construction and operation phases.
9.2 The effect of construction of the Proposed Development on daylight, sunlight and
overshadowing is considered to be negligible.
9.3 The effect of the operational maximum parameter Proposed Development on residential
amenity at the properties on Forest View is considered to range from major adverse to
negligible. However, this effect is likely to be reduced when the massing and articulation of
the buildings are considered at the detailed design stage.
9.4 The assessment has shown that the Completed Development will have a negligible effect on
new and adjacent amenity areas in terms of overshadowing. In terms of solar glare, the
technical analysis shows that for the majority of the year there would be negligible effect.
However, the nature of the Proposed Development does mean that reflected solar glare
would be unavoidable at certain times of the day assuming that there are clear skies at these
times to allow the sun to reflect off the building façades. However, at worst this would be a
highly localised minor adverse effect lasting only a short period of time. The effects from
daytime solar glare are not considered to be detrimental to the safe movement around the
roads and pavements surrounding the Proposed Development.
9.5 Due to the distance of the cumulative schemes from the Proposed Development, there will be
no cumulative effects when considering the effects of daylight, sunlight, overshadowing and
solar glare.
10.0 NOISE AND VIBRATION
10.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on noise and
vibration for the construction and operation phases.
10.2 During the construction of Phases One and Two the implementation of suitable control
measures through the CEMP the effects resulting from construction noise and vibration would
be temporary and of minor to moderate adverse significance depending on the location of
the Noise Sensitive Receptors (NSRs) in relation to the construction activities.
10.3 The Application Site is suitable for residential amenity provided measures including use of
appropriate window glazing and ventilation are implemented. In addition should private
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 17 February 2013
residential balconies orientated towards Harbour Parade form part of the Proposed
Development, solid balustrades and recessed balconies would act to reduce noise levels
thereby safeguarding the residential amenity for future residents.
10.4 The potential noise effects from the Proposed Development uses can be suitably controlled
through the use of planning conditions which prescribe noise limits for fixed mechanical plant
together with suitable operational controls. Further to this, noise effects can be mitigated
through appropriate building design and suitable operational controls to safeguard the
residential amenity for existing off site NSRs and future proposed on-site NSRs.
10.5 Due to the distance of the cumulative schemes from the Proposed Development and the
implementation of appropriate mitigation measures such as those discussed above, there will
be no cumulative effects when considering the effects of noise and vibration.
11.0 AIR QUALITY
11.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on air quality
for the construction and operation phases. The Application Site is outside of any Air Quality
Management Area8.
11.2 During construction of Phase One and Two, following the implementation of appropriate
environmental management controls through the CEMP, the likely residual temporary effects
of construction-related dust would be minor adverse at the closest properties between 10m
and 100m of the Application Site boundary and negligible at all other sensitive receptors. The
temporary residual effects of emissions and dust from construction vehicles entering and
leaving the Application Site would be minor adverse to moderate adverse.
11.3 During operation of Phase One and Two the likely residual effects at receptors surrounding
the Application Site are predicted to result in negligible to minor adverse effects on local
concentration of Nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) taking into account
the operation of the potential Energy Centre.
11.4 In terms of cumulative effects, the combined construction traffic of all cumulative schemes
may cause cumulative local air quality effects in the worse case scenario whereby the other
development schemes are constructed at the same time as Phase One or Phase Two. In
contrast there will be no significant cumulative operational effects associated with either
Phases One or Two.
8 An Air Quality Management Area is a defined area by virtue of Section 82(3) of the Environment Act 1995, where it appears that the air quality objectives prescribed under the UK Air Quality Strategy will not be achieved. In these areas, a Local Authority must designate Air Quality Management Areas, within which an Action Plan can be proposed to secure improvements in air quality so that prescribed air quality objectives can be achieved.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 18 February 2013
12.0 WATER RESOURCES AND FLOOD RISK
12.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on water
resources and flood risk for the construction and operation phases.
12.2 The Application Site is located between the River Test and the River Itchen which form a
confluence to the southeast of the Application Site. The River Test is located approximately
450m south of the Application Site and the River Itchen approximately 1.3 km to the east;
these combined rivers flow in a south easterly direction into the English Channel. A number
of statutory designated nature conservation sites lie within 2km of the Application Site.
12.3 The geological deposits underlying the Application Site are classified as a minor aquifer,
there are high groundwater levels on-site and groundwater flows to the southwest towards
the River Test. The Proposed Development should have a negligible effect on localised
groundwater flows and levels during both the construction and operational phases of the
Proposed Development.
12.4 Appropriate mitigation measures will be employed during the construction phases of the
Proposed Development, primarily through the implementation of the CEMP, to safeguard
surrounding surface waters and groundwater from any adverse effects associated with
construction activities. These measures will result in temporary negligible effects.
12.5 It is envisaged that the Proposed Development will discharge to Southern Water’s existing
drainage network and sewerage infrastructure. Should new foul and surface water drainage
be required in order to accommodate the Proposed Development this will be undertaken in
consultation with Southern Water. The drainage strategy envisages a reduction in surface
water run-off from the Application Site due to the use of large landscaped areas for storage,
in order to limit the discharge rate into the public sewer, which should have a beneficial
effect in respect of surface water discharge to the sewer compared with the existing
situation. These measures will result in long-term negligible effects
12.6 The Proposed Development will lie within areas at low flood risk (Flood Zone 1) with the
exception of the far north-west corner which lies within an area at medium risk of flooding
(Flood Zone 2). All Phase One land uses are assumed to have a 60-year lifespan so would
not be at risk of tidal flooding throughout their lifetime. However, Phase Two, which
includes residential development, is assumed to have 100-year lifespan so buildings in DZ3
and DZ4 would be at risk of tidal flooding towards the end of their lifetime (after 2070)
based on current climate change predictions. As such, consideration should be given to
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 19 February 2013
appropriate flood resilience and management measures for the Phase Two development area
at detailed design stage. These measures will result in long-term negligible effects.
12.7 There are no foreseeable cumulative effects associated with the Application Site in relation to
other development schemes in the area.
13.0 GROUND CONDITIONS
13.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on ground
conditions for the construction and operation phases. The potential for ground contamination
to be present at the Application Site has been identified as part of the assessment. Any such
contamination could be localised or widespread.
13.2 Subject to the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures including site
investigations and remediation prior to construction, the residual effects of the Proposed
Development should largely be negligible, with one minor adverse effect identified in relation
to ground contamination during construction of the Proposed Development.
13.3 The Application Site is considered suitable for the Proposed Development. It is anticipated
that on completion of the Proposed Development the National Planning Policy Framework
requirement that the Application Site would no longer be able to be captured under the
Environment Act Part IIA regime9, will be met.
13.4 Given that ground conditions are specific and local to the Application Site, the Proposed
Development would not give rise to adverse effects that would interact with any of the
agreed ‘cumulative schemes’, either during the Proposed Development’s construction or
following its completion. Therefore, it is considered that the Proposed Development would
not give rise to any significant cumulative effects.
14.0 WIND MICROCLIMATE
14.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on wind
microclimate for the construction and operation phases.
14.2 Current wind conditions for the existing open Application Site are expected to be suitable for
leisure walking on both the upper pedestrian level on the east side of the Application Site
9 Specific UK legislation on contaminated land is principally contained within Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) 1990. The
legislation endorses the principle of a ‘suitable for use’ approach to contaminated land, where remedial action is only required if there are
unacceptable risks to human health or the environment, taking into account the use of the land and its environmental setting.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 20 February 2013
(above the Town Wall) and the lower pedestrian level on the west end of the Application
Site. The meteorological data indicates that prevailing winds are from the south-west with a
secondary peak from the north-east.
14.3 It is considered there will be negligible effects on the wind microclimate during the
construction of Phase One and Phase Two of the Proposed Development.
14.4 The assessment has shown that the windier parts of the Completed Development are
expected:
• at the west facing building corners;
• along the thoroughfare between Phase One and Two; and
• Between Phase Two and QSDC.
14.5 The wind microclimate at the majority of entrances to the Proposed Development is suitable
for the intended use. Therefore the effects would be negligible significance during
operation.
14.6 As there are no cumulative developments within a 500m radius of the Application Site there
are considered to be no cumulative effects during the construction or operation of the
Proposed Development.
15.0 ARCHAEOLOGY
15.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on
archaeology for the construction and operation phases.
15.2 The main part of the Application Site lies west of the medieval walled town on land reclaimed
from the River Test foreshore in the twentieth century. However, in early prehistory the river
level was much lower than it is today. Evidence for Palaeolithic and Mesolithic activity (pre c.
4000 BC) in bands of peat within the alluvial deposits below modern levelling has been found
in the foreshore zone. It is also possible that the remains of ancient vessels abandoned on
the foreshore in almost any period of the past may survive near to or on the surface of the
alluvium.
15.3 The principal effect of the Proposed Development on archaeological remains west of the
walled town will be as a result of piling within the footprint of DZ4 within Phase Two.
Mitigation will take place in accordance with the provisions of government policy as set out in
the National Planning Policy Framework, regional and local planning policies. In advance of
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 21 February 2013
construction, mitigation will include an archaeological evaluation to a specification agreed
with the Planning Archaeologist at SCC. Should any significant remains be found, a further
programme of appropriate mitigation will be put in place to allow recording and recovery.
The effects will be permanent negligible significance.
15.4 Localised groundworks on the part of the Application Site within the town walls is likely to
have some effect on archaeological remains, largely of the medieval period, which were
identified in a 2009 site evaluation. The effects will be of permanent negligible significance.
15.5 It is expected that archaeological investigation will take place at all the cumulative schemes
in order to mitigate the potential effects of development such that the archaeological
resource will be preserved by record. It is considered that there will be negligible cumulative
effects on archaeological remains from development of the Proposed Development and the
cumulative schemes.
16.0 BUILT HERITAGE
16.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on built
heritage for the construction and operation phases.
16.2 Following the adoption of the CEMP during the construction phases which details appropriate
piling and remediation techniques, imposition of protective zone, and use of site hoardings
during demolition and construction works, residual effects on the setting of Scheduled
Monuments and listed buildings within the study area will be minor adverse to negligible.
The minor effects will be experienced by the Town Walls and the associated designated
structures, and the settings of the Old Town West Conservation Area and Old Town North
Conservation Area.
16.3 The mitigation measures inherent within the Design Principles of the Proposed Development
will minimise the adverse effects on the sensitive Town Walls and adjacent Conservation
Areas, via design, materials, building placement, and the creation of visual permeability.
Connectivity between the Proposed Development and the Town Walls and the Old Town
Conservation Areas will be strengthened through defining and reinforcing important view
corridors to historic assets including the Town Walls.
16.4 In addition, the increased activity along Western Esplanade will encourage greater visitor
numbers to appreciate the resource. The new pedestrian routes and the creation of views
within and through the Completed Development, along with the improvements to pedestrian
access and linkages and resulting increase in activity, will represent a minor beneficial effect,
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 22 February 2013
improving the connectivity of the area with the Town Walls and the Old Town Conservation
Areas beyond.
16.5 In terms of cumulative effects, there are anticipated to be negligible during construction of
Phases One and Two. When the Proposed Development is complete, assuming that all the
development schemes are completed to a high standard, the cumulative effects should be
considered to be no greater than those described above with effects of negligible significance
for minimum parameters with the potential to increase to minor significance under maximum
parameters for the Completed Development.
17.0 WASTE
17.1 The ES has included an assessment of the effect of the Proposed Development on waste for
the construction and operation phases.
17.2 During construction of Phases One and Two the implementation of a Site Waste Management
Plan will ensure that waste is managed in accordance with relevant legislation and that,
where feasible, at least 50% of waste is reused or recycled. The residual effect of the
construction activities would likely result in a negligible effect on the quantity of waste
generated within the administrative boundaries of SCC.
17.3 During operation of Phase One and the Completed Development, the detailed design of the
commercial development will provide sufficient space for the storage of waste. The proposed
service yards will be designed with sufficient head height for access by waste collection
vehicles or alternative waste collection facilities will be provided. Provided the detailed
design incorporates these elements, and information is provided on the waste management
system the residual effect is considered to be, at worst, negligible.
17.4 During operation of the Completed Development provided that the detailed design of the
Completed Development provides sufficient storage both within the residential apartments
and within one or more central waste storage areas in line with SCC storage requirements to
segregate waste, that the location of storage is appropriate to minimise the distance that
residents need to transport waste, and that residents are informed, on occupation, of the
waste management system in terms of where to deposit waste and the requirement to
recycle, the residual effect is considered to be, at worst, negligible.
17.5 There are no foreseeable cumulative effects associated with the Application Site in relation to
other development schemes in the area.
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 23 February 2013
18.0 RESIDUAL EFFECTS AND CONCLUSIONS
18.1 In summary, the Proposed Development will comprise a mixed use development including
Class D2 leisure uses (including a cinema), Class A1-A5 retail uses, Class C1 hotel use, Class
C3 residential use, and Class B1(a) office use along with car parking, access, highways,
landscaping and public open space.
18.2 Phase One will result in the following beneficial effects:
• Creation of approximately 600 full, part-time and temporary jobs along with further
indirect employment opportunities during construction;
• Creation of a maximum of 500 full and part-time jobs with wider spin-off benefits for
local shops, businesses and services;
• Provision of space for retail and restaurants catering largely for retailers and
restaurant/leisure operators not present in the City Centre and WQSC;
• Promotion of accessibility (including improvements to pedestrian facilities) and
enhancements to social inclusion in the area around the Application Site and City Centre;
• Enhanced degree of natural surveillance in the area through the mix of uses which allow
the Proposed Development to be active during day and night time hours;
• Provision of ecological enhancement measures such as provision of suitable nesting
opportunities for birds, roosting opportunities for bats and foraging habitat for
invertebrates, birds and bats;
• Enhancement to the local landscape character and the majority of views and character
areas; and
• Improvement to the setting of the Grade I listed Town Walls.
18.3 Phase Two will add the following beneficial effects to those outlined above:
• Creation of a further approximately 600 full, part-time and temporary jobs along with
further indirect employment opportunities during construction;
• Provision of residential units in the form of a range of units providing accommodation for
up to 937 people; and
• Provision of a hotel and leisure facilities.
18.4 The ES has also identified a number of adverse effects, during the construction and operation
of Phase One and Phase Two. Adverse construction effects include:
• Temporary deterioration of the setting of the character area around the Town Walls
Watermark WestQuay, Southampton Non Technical Summary
19314/A5/NTS2013 24 February 2013
(CA11) and views from the Catchcold and Arundel Towers;
• Potential for mobilisation of contaminants resulting in the deterioration of surface and
ground water quality;
• Potential for dust emissions resulting from the groundworks and general construction
activities;
• Potential for noise disturbance to the nearby residents in Southampton from construction
and construction traffic; and
• Potential for temporary effects on air quality from construction vehicle emissions.
18.5 The implementation of the mitigation measures during construction such as the use of site
hoarding, dust and noise suppression measures and temporary drainage will result in many
adverse effects being reduced or avoided.
18.6 The adverse operational effects during Phase One and the Completed Development identified
by the ES include:
• Increase traffic and potential delays to travel time associated with the Eastern Harbour
Parade /West Quay Road junction;
• A deterioration of some views from the top of Town Walls and the Old Town Conservation
Area (OTCA) through loss of distance views to the waterfront; and
• Loss in sunlight for a small number of properties on Forest View, however, this effect is
likely to be reduced when the massing and articulation of the buildings are considered at
the detailed design stage.