water and wastewater rates in the city of ...water rate increase – 2001 to 2005 inflationary and...
TRANSCRIPT
WATER AND WASTEWATER RATES IN THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY
Overview of Price Trends and Cost Factors
kpmg
2
Key Questions
Why have water rates increased since 2001?Why have water rates increased since 2001?How does the City compare to other municipalities?How does the City compare to other municipalities?
Billing structuresBilling structuresWater and wastewater costsWater and wastewater costsRate increasesRate increases
How are water rates projected to change in the future?How are water rates projected to change in the future?
Pricing Trends
kpmg
4
Water and Wastewater Costs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Capital Operating
Water Costs (millions)Water Costs (millions)Water Costs (millions)
30% increase
$18.1
$22.7
$23.6
$19.1$20.7
kpmg
5
Water and Wastewater Costs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Capital Operating
Wastewater Costs (millions)Wastewater Costs (millions)Wastewater Costs (millions)
32% increase
$17.3
$21.1$22.9
$18.2 $19.7
kpmg
6
Water Rates
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.700
0.800
0.900
1.000
Jan 1999 Jan 2002 Jan 2003 Jan 2004 Jan 2005Jan 2000 Jan 2001 Jul 2001
$0.770
$0.610
$0.670$0.734
$0.791$0.770 $0.770
$0.590
34% increase$0.201 per m3
Variable Rate (per m3)Variable Rate (per mVariable Rate (per m33))
kpmg
7
Water Rates
-
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
Jan 1999 Jan 2002 Jan 2003 Jan 2004 Jan 2005Jan 2000 Jan 2001 Jul 2001
$8.77 $9.07$9.96
$10.92 $11.76
$8.77 $8.77 $8.77
34% increase$2.99 per month
Service Charge (per month)Service Charge (per month)Service Charge (per month)
kpmg
8
Impact on Residential Customer
20012001 20052005
Average residential consumptionAverage residential consumption 20 m20 m33 20 m20 m33
Variable consumption chargeVariable consumption charge $0.590$0.590 $0.791$0.791
Monthly consumption chargeMonthly consumption charge $11.80$11.80 $15.82$15.82
Monthly service chargeMonthly service charge $8.77$8.77 $11.76$11.76
Total monthly water billingTotal monthly water billing $20.57$20.57 $27.58$27.58
Monthly wastewater billingMonthly wastewater billing $23.66$23.66 $31.99$31.99
Total monthly water and wastewater billingTotal monthly water and wastewater billing $44.23$44.23 $59.57$59.57
Monthly increaseMonthly increase $15.34$15.34
Annual increaseAnnual increase $184.08$184.08
Average Monthly CostAverage Monthly CostAverage Monthly Cost
kpmg
9
Residential Customer Billing
kpmg
10
Residential Customer Billing
Cost Drivers
kpmg
12
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
13
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increases8.4¢ per cubic 8.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 14.3%or 14.3%
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
14
Inflationary and Regulatory Cost Increases
Provincial requirements stemming from WalkertonProvincial requirements stemming from WalkertonEnergy costsEnergy costsChemical costsChemical costsExpiration of OMERS holidayExpiration of OMERS holidayWage increases pursuant to collective agreementWage increases pursuant to collective agreement
Comparative cost indicesComparative cost indices 2001 to2001 to20052005
Consumer price indexConsumer price index 9.2%9.2%Electric power selling price indexElectric power selling price index 31.4%31.4%Industrial price index Industrial price index –– chlorinechlorine 20.5%20.5%
Impact – 8.4¢ or 14.3%Impact Impact –– 8.4¢ or 14.3%8.4¢ or 14.3%
kpmg
15
Inflationary and Regulatory Cost Increases
Since 2002, the Ministry of the Since 2002, the Ministry of the Environment has charged and/or Environment has charged and/or fined more than 50 municipalities fined more than 50 municipalities for regulatory violationsfor regulatory violationsOne municipality is currently One municipality is currently facing 12 charges carrying facing 12 charges carrying maximum fines of $26 millionmaximum fines of $26 million
The Cost of Non-ComplianceThe Cost of NonThe Cost of Non--ComplianceCompliance
Number of municipalities fined/chargedNumber of municipalities fined/charged
0
5
10
15
20
25
2002 2003 2004
kpmg
16
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increases8.4¢ per cubic 8.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 14.3%or 14.3%
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
17
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increases8.4¢ per cubic 8.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 14.3%or 14.3%
Sustainable capital asset management policy Sustainable capital asset management policy 6.3¢ per cubic 6.3¢ per cubic metremetre or 10.6%or 10.6%
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
18
Sustainable Capital Asset Management
The City’s current investment in water infrastructure is estimatThe City’s current investment in water infrastructure is estimated to be ed to be just over $700 millionjust over $700 million
NumberNumber ReplacementReplacementValue (millions)Value (millions)
Production infrastructureProduction infrastructureWater treatment plantsWater treatment plants 22 $90$90Well systemsWell systems 2121 $5$5
$95$95
Distribution infrastructureDistribution infrastructureWater distribution pipes (metres)Water distribution pipes (metres) 870,000870,000 $435$435ValvesValves 7,5007,500 $30$30Tanks and reservoirsTanks and reservoirs 88 $15$15Booster and pumping stationsBooster and pumping stations 1212 $6$6
$486$486
Service infrastructureService infrastructureWater services connectionsWater services connections 42,00042,000 $105$105Fire hydrantsFire hydrants 4,6504,650 $23$23
$128$128
Total infrastructure costTotal infrastructure cost $709$709
Impact – 6.3¢ or 10.6%Impact Impact –– 6.3¢ or 10.6%6.3¢ or 10.6%
kpmg
19
Sustainable Capital Asset Management
In order to maintain the current state of this infrastructure, tIn order to maintain the current state of this infrastructure, the City is he City is required to spend approximately 2% of the replacement value on arequired to spend approximately 2% of the replacement value on an n annual basisannual basis
Capital financing in 2001 amounted to less than 1%Capital financing in 2001 amounted to less than 1%The establishment of a sustainable capital asset management progThe establishment of a sustainable capital asset management program in ram in 2002 increased the capital financing component of the water and 2002 increased the capital financing component of the water and wastewater rates (phased in over 10 years) wastewater rates (phased in over 10 years)
Increases will continue until 2012Increases will continue until 2012
(millions)(millions) 20022002 20032003 20042004 20052005
Additional annual capital financing Additional annual capital financing $0.4$0.4 $0.8$0.8 $1.2$1.2 $1.6$1.6
Cumulative increase in water costsCumulative increase in water costs 2.6%2.6% 5.3%5.3% 7.9%7.9% 10.6%10.6%
kpmg
20
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increases8.4¢ per cubic 8.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 14.3%or 14.3%
Sustainable capital asset management policy Sustainable capital asset management policy 6.3¢ per cubic 6.3¢ per cubic metremetre or 10.6%or 10.6%
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
21
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increases8.4¢ per cubic 8.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 14.3%or 14.3%
Sustainable capital asset management policy Sustainable capital asset management policy 6.3¢ per cubic 6.3¢ per cubic metremetre or 10.6%or 10.6%
Allocation of program support costsAllocation of program support costs2.4¢ per cubic 2.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 4.0%or 4.0%
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
22
Allocation of Program Support Costs
Water costs for 2005 reflect an allocation of program support coWater costs for 2005 reflect an allocation of program support costs not sts not previously financed through water ratespreviously financed through water rates
FinanceFinanceInformation technologyInformation technologyHuman resourcesHuman resourcesLegalLegal
This allocation reflects the transition towards full cost accounThis allocation reflects the transition towards full cost accounting for water ting for water and wastewater services mandated/to be required by Provincial and wastewater services mandated/to be required by Provincial legislationlegislationTotal allocation for 2005 is anticipated to be $600,000Total allocation for 2005 is anticipated to be $600,000
Would be financed through municipal levy if not recovered througWould be financed through municipal levy if not recovered through h water rateswater rates
Impact – 2.4¢ or 4.0%Impact Impact –– 2.4¢ or 4.0%2.4¢ or 4.0%
kpmg
23
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increases8.4¢ per cubic 8.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 14.3%or 14.3%
Sustainable capital asset management policy Sustainable capital asset management policy 6.3¢ per cubic 6.3¢ per cubic metremetre or 10.6%or 10.6%
Allocation of program support costsAllocation of program support costs2.4¢ per cubic 2.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 4.0%or 4.0%
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
24
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increases8.4¢ per cubic 8.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 14.3%or 14.3%
Sustainable capital asset management policy Sustainable capital asset management policy 6.3¢ per cubic 6.3¢ per cubic metremetre or 10.6%or 10.6%
Allocation of program support costsAllocation of program support costs2.4¢ per cubic 2.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 4.0%or 4.0%
Consumption decreasesConsumption decreases1.8¢ per cubic 1.8¢ per cubic metremetre or 3.1%or 3.1%
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
25
Consumption Decreases
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
16.00
17.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
2001 2002 20031999 2000
17.6 million 18.1 million
16.4 million
17.4 million
18.2 million
Consumption levels (m3)Consumption levels (mConsumption levels (m33))
16.5 million
2004
kpmg
26
Consumption Decreases
(millions)(millions) 20022002 20032003 20042004 20052005
Costs to be financed by consumption charge Costs to be financed by consumption charge $10.8$10.8 $11.8$11.8 $12.7$12.7 $13.6$13.6
2001 consumption level (millions of m2001 consumption level (millions of m33)) 17.617.6 17.617.6 17.617.6 17.617.6
Water rate per mWater rate per m33 (assuming no change)(assuming no change) 61.0¢61.0¢ 67.0¢ 67.0¢ 72.2¢ 72.2¢ 77.3¢77.3¢
Actual water rate per mActual water rate per m33 61.0¢61.0¢ 67.0¢67.0¢ 73.4¢73.4¢ 79.1¢79.1¢
Effect of decrease in consumptionEffect of decrease in consumption –– –– 1.2¢ 1.2¢ 1.8¢1.8¢
Impact – 1.8¢ or 3.1%Impact Impact –– 1.8¢ or 3.1%1.8¢ or 3.1%
kpmg
27
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increases8.4¢ per cubic 8.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 14.3%or 14.3%
Sustainable capital asset management policy Sustainable capital asset management policy 6.3¢ per cubic 6.3¢ per cubic metremetre or 10.6%or 10.6%
Allocation of program support costsAllocation of program support costs2.4¢ per cubic 2.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 4.0%or 4.0%
Consumption decreasesConsumption decreases1.8¢ per cubic 1.8¢ per cubic metremetre or 3.1%or 3.1%
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
28
Water Rate Increase – 2001 to 2005
Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increases8.4¢ per cubic 8.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 14.3%or 14.3%
Loss of INCO and Falconbridge donationsLoss of INCO and Falconbridge donations1.2¢ per cubic 1.2¢ per cubic metremetre or 2.0%or 2.0%
Sustainable capital asset management policy Sustainable capital asset management policy 6.3¢ per cubic 6.3¢ per cubic metremetre or 10.6%or 10.6%
Allocation of program support costsAllocation of program support costs2.4¢ per cubic 2.4¢ per cubic metremetre or 4.0%or 4.0%
Consumption decreasesConsumption decreases1.8¢ per cubic 1.8¢ per cubic metremetre or 3.1%or 3.1%
Total increaseTotal increase20.1¢ per cubic 20.1¢ per cubic metremetre or 34%or 34%
kpmg
29
Loss of INCO and Falconbridge Donations
During 2001, INCO and Falconbridge committed to a total donationDuring 2001, INCO and Falconbridge committed to a total donation of of $1.3 million to offset the shift of costs to non$1.3 million to offset the shift of costs to non--mining customers resulting mining customers resulting from the implementation of a full recovery wastewater ratefrom the implementation of a full recovery wastewater rate
WaterWater WastewaterWastewater TotalTotal
20012001 $300,000$300,000 $300,000$300,000 $600,000$600,00020022002 $200,000$200,000 $200,000$200,000 $400,000$400,00020032003 $165,000$165,000 $165,000$165,000 $330,000$330,00020042004 –– –– ––20052005 –– –– ––
As the amount of the annual donations have decreased, water rateAs the amount of the annual donations have decreased, water rates have s have risen by a corresponding amountrisen by a corresponding amount
Impact – 1.2¢ or 2.0%Impact Impact –– 1.2¢ or 2.0%1.2¢ or 2.0%
Municipal Comparisons
kpmg
31
How Does Sudbury Compare?
The current rate structure utilized by Greater Sudbury reflects The current rate structure utilized by Greater Sudbury reflects common common practice for similar sized municipalitiespractice for similar sized municipalities
Variable RateVariable Rate MonthlyMonthlyUniformUniform OtherOther NoneNone Service ChargeService Charge
Greater SudburyGreater SudburySault Ste. MarieSault Ste. MarieNorth BayNorth BayTimminsTimminsThunder BayThunder BayBarrieBarrieBrantfordBrantfordKawartha LakesKawartha LakesKingstonKingston
PeterboroughPeterboroughSarniaSarnia
Water Billing StructureWater Billing StructureWater Billing Structure
kpmg
32
How Does Sudbury Compare?
The current rate structure utilized by Greater Sudbury reflects The current rate structure utilized by Greater Sudbury reflects common common practice for similar sized municipalitiespractice for similar sized municipalities
Sewer RateSewer Rate Applied toApplied toPercentagePercentage OtherOther ServiceService
of Waterof Water ChargeCharge
Greater SudburyGreater SudburySault Ste. MarieSault Ste. MarieNorth BayNorth BayTimminsTimminsThunder BayThunder BayBarrieBarrieBrantfordBrantfordKawartha LakesKawartha LakesKingstonKingstonPeterboroughPeterboroughSarniaSarnia
Wastewater Billing StructureWastewater Billing StructureWastewater Billing Structure
kpmg
33
How Does Sudbury Compare?
Monthly CostsMonthly CostsMonthly Costs
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Brantford
Sarnia
Barrie
Kingston
Kawartha Lakes
Timmins
Thunder Bay
North Bay
Sault Ste. Marie
Sudbury
Water Wastewater
Assumed consumption Assumed consumption –– 20 m20 m33 per monthper month
kpmg
34
How Does Sudbury Compare?
Assumed consumption Assumed consumption –– 20 m20 m33 per monthper month WaterWater WastewaterWastewater TotalTotal
Greater SudburyGreater Sudbury $27.58$27.58 $31.99$31.99 $59.57$59.57
Sault Ste. MarieSault Ste. Marie $16.07$16.07 $16.07$16.07 $32.14$32.14North BayNorth Bay $15.78$15.78 $14.15$14.15 $29.93$29.93TimminsTimmins $18.24$18.24 $10.94$10.94 $29.18$29.18Thunder BayThunder Bay $17.95$17.95 $11.67$11.67 $29.62$29.62BarrieBarrie $24.56$24.56 $15.00$15.00 $39.56$39.56BrantfordBrantford $21.95$21.95 $12.00$12.00 $33.95$33.95Kawartha LakesKawartha Lakes $37.54$37.54 $38.67$38.67 $76.21$76.21KingstonKingston $18.68$18.68 $33.88$33.88 $52.56$52.56SarniaSarnia $21.80$21.80 $12.46$12.46 $34.26$34.26
Monthly CostsMonthly CostsMonthly Costs
kpmg
35
Why So High?
Large geographic area combined with a number of separate Large geographic area combined with a number of separate population clusterspopulation clustersTopographyTopographyGround characteristicsGround characteristics
SudburySudbury Sault Ste. Sault Ste. PeterboroughPeterborough OttawaOttawaMarieMarie
Water treatment plantsWater treatment plants 22 11 11 22Well systemsWell systems 2121 66 –– 44Booster and pumping stationsBooster and pumping stations 1212 22 44 2020Tanks and reservoirsTanks and reservoirs 88 33 –– 1414
Sewage treatment plantsSewage treatment plants 1010 22 11 22LagoonsLagoons 44 –– –– ––Lift stationsLift stations 7777 1818 1313 1414
GeographyGeographyGeography
kpmg
36
Why So High?
Currently, Greater Sudbury appears to be the only major municipaCurrently, Greater Sudbury appears to be the only major municipality in lity in Northern Ontario that has adopted true full cost recovery for waNorthern Ontario that has adopted true full cost recovery for water and ter and wastewater serviceswastewater services
(in millions)(in millions) WaterWaterUser FeesUser Fees ExpensesExpenses ShortfallShortfall
Sault Ste. MarieSault Ste. Marie $6.2$6.2 $8.5$8.5 ($2.3)($2.3)North BayNorth Bay $5.2$5.2 $6.1$6.1 ($0.9)($0.9)TimminsTimmins $4.4$4.4 $6.2$6.2 ($1.8)($1.8)Thunder BayThunder Bay $12.7$12.7 $17.7$17.7 ($5.0)($5.0)
(in millions)(in millions) WastewaterWastewaterUser FeesUser Fees ExpensesExpenses ShortfallShortfall
Sault Ste. MarieSault Ste. Marie $6.1$6.1 $8.8$8.8 ($2.7)($2.7)North BayNorth Bay $5.2$5.2 $3.8$3.8 $1.4$1.4TimminsTimmins –– $2.6$2.6 ($2.6)($2.6)Thunder BayThunder Bay $7.4$7.4 $15.1$15.1 ($7.7)($7.7)
Full Cost RecoveryFull Cost RecoveryFull Cost Recovery
kpmg
37
Why So High?
If Greater Sudbury financed water and wastewater costs through tIf Greater Sudbury financed water and wastewater costs through the he municipal levy to the same extent as Thunder Bay, the average momunicipal levy to the same extent as Thunder Bay, the average monthly nthly cost would be reduced by $15 per monthcost would be reduced by $15 per month
The municipal levy would experience a corresponding increase of The municipal levy would experience a corresponding increase of $10.2 million or 6.9%$10.2 million or 6.9%
(in millions)(in millions) WaterWater WastewaterWastewater
Budgeted costs Budgeted costs –– 20052005 $23.6$23.6 $22.9$22.9Less:Less:
Other revenue sourcesOther revenue sources ($0.9)($0.9) ($0.4)($0.4)Municipal levy financingMunicipal levy financing ($5.0)($5.0) ($7.7)($7.7)
Required user fee revenueRequired user fee revenue $17.7$17.7 $14.8$14.8Actual projected user fee revenueActual projected user fee revenue $20.3$20.3 $22.5$22.5
Potential reduction in user feesPotential reduction in user fees 12.8%12.8% 34.2%34.2%
Full Cost RecoveryFull Cost RecoveryFull Cost Recovery
kpmg
38
Why So High?
Where sustainable capital asset management programs have been Where sustainable capital asset management programs have been introduced in Southern Ontario, water customers have seen markedintroduced in Southern Ontario, water customers have seen markedincreases in water ratesincreases in water rates
20002000 20012001 20022002 20032003 20042004
Greater SudburyGreater Sudbury –– (20.8%)(20.8%) 3.8%3.8% 9.8%9.8% 9.6%9.6%YorkYork 2.8%2.8% 2.5%2.5% 0.3%0.3% 5.0%5.0% 5.0%5.0%DurhamDurham 0.4%0.4% 3.5%3.5% 4.6%4.6% 5.5%5.5% 6.5%6.5%PeelPeel –– –– 3.0%3.0% 3.0%3.0% 5.0%5.0%HaltonHalton 2.3%2.3% 7.1%7.1% 7.5%7.5% 6.5%6.5% 9.1%9.1%HamiltonHamilton 39.5%39.5% 14.9%14.9% 12.0%12.0% 8.6%8.6% 9.5%9.5%TorontoToronto 2.0%2.0% 2.1%2.1% 9.0%9.0% 9.0%9.0% 6.0%6.0%
Capital Asset ManagementCapital Asset ManagementCapital Asset Management
kpmg
39
Why So High?
20012001 20052005 IncreaseIncrease
Water and wastewater Water and wastewater –– Greater SudburyGreater Sudbury $44.23$44.23 $59.57$59.57 34%34%
Residential telephone (local service only)Residential telephone (local service only) $22.14$22.14 $22.14$22.14 ––ElectricityElectricity $94.15$94.15 $94.92$94.92 1%1%Natural gasNatural gas $42.52$42.52 $51.51$51.51 21%21%Basic cable televisionBasic cable television $19.81$19.81 $25.08$25.08 27%27%
One litre of municipal waterOne litre of municipal water $0.003$0.003One litre of bottled waterOne litre of bottled water $2.200$2.200
Monthly Utility CostsMonthly Utility CostsMonthly Utility Costs
Bottled vs. Tap WaterBottled vs. Tap WaterBottled vs. Tap Water
Anticipated Future Rates
kpmg
41
Anticipated Future Rates
Future water and wastewater costs will continue to increase due Future water and wastewater costs will continue to increase due to:to:Inflationary and regulatory cost increasesInflationary and regulatory cost increasesContinued phaseContinued phase--in of the sustainable capital asset management in of the sustainable capital asset management programprogram
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Forecasted Monthly CostsForecasted Monthly CostsForecasted Monthly Costs
WATER AND WASTEWATER RATES IN THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY
Overview of Price Trends and Cost Factors