wastewater epidemiology and related...
TRANSCRIPT
Wastewater epidemiology and related uncertainties
Sara Castiglioni Mario Negri Institute
Department of Environmental Health Sciences Unity of Environmental Biomarkers
COST Action ES1307– Malta 27-28 October 2014
COST is supported by the
EU Framework Programme
Horizon 2020
ESF provides the COST
Office through an EC
contract
Rational of the approach
Almost all substances we consume are excreted unchanged or as a mixture of metabolites in urine and/faeces Excreted substances end up in sewer
network
Enter sewage treatment plants
Raw wastewater is containing all the metabolic residues of substances consumed by a defined
population
Raw wastewater contains multiple information on human habits in a defined population
Wastewater-Based Epidemiology Approach
Estimation of illicit drugs consumption cocaine, amphetamines, ecstasy, cannabis, heroin
Monitoring drinking habits ethyl sulphate and ethyl glucuronide
Monitoring smoking habits cotinine and trans-3’-hydroxycotinine
Identify the use of new synthetic recreational drugs synthetic cannabinoids, cathinones (NPS)
Wastewater-Based Epidemiology Current applications
Other potential applications related to lifestyle, health and diet and environment (Thomas and Reid, ES&T, 2011, 45:7611)
Temporal trends in Milan (2005-2012) - Loads g/day Zuccato et al. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2011
5
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Cocaine
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Heroin
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
THC
0
50
100
150
200
250
Metamphetamine
Estimation of Illicit Drugs Consumption
Monitoring of drinking habits Oslo September 2009 (Reid et al., Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2011)
Monitoring of drinking habits Milan (30 September - 03 November 2013)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
40003
0-s
et
01
-ott
02
-ott
03
-ott
04
-ott
05
-ott
06
-ott
07
-ott
08
-ott
09
-ott
10
-ott
11
-ott
12
-ott
13
-ott
14
-ott
15
-ott
16
-ott
17
-ott
18
-ott
19
-ott
20
-ott
21
-ott
22
-ott
23
-ott
24
-ott
25
-ott
26
-ott
27
-ott
28
-ott
29
-ott
30
-ott
31
-ott
01
-no
v
02
-no
v
03
-no
v
Lod
sg
/day
Ethyl Suphate (EtS)
Monitoring of smoking habits Castiglioni et al., Tobacco Control, 2014
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Nicotine Cotinine trans-3'-hydroxycotinine
Load
s(g
/day
/10
00
inh
abit
ants
)
North ITALY Centre ITALY South ITALY
***
******
**
****
Number of cigarettes smoked
Wastewater analysis Epidemiological survey data Difference (%)
Northern Italy 1695538 1701190 +0.3
Central Italy 2987243 3114850 +4
Southern Italy 1207092 1112987 -8%
Back-calculation using cotinine + trans-3’-hydroxycotinine
Monitoring of new synthetic recreational drugs Reid et al., Drug Anal Test. 2013
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Oslo Hamar Bergen
mg
/1
00
0 i
nh
./d
ay
BE
THC-COOH
JWH 018-5OHP
Cathine
Monitoring of new synthetic recreational drugs
Ketamine is a dissociative
anaesthetic drug...
...with documented increase in its use
as a recreational drug
Increased use in Milan from 2008 to 2013 4-5 weeks investigated per year
Profile of KETAMINE use in Milan in a six-year study
Wastewater – based epidemiology
To produce reliable data:
• identify gaps or uncertainty
• minimize or control uncertainties when possible
• improve our method
1. Are these data reliable? 2. Wastewater analysis can be used to integrate epidemiological data?
Best practice protocol
Identification of uncertainties associated with all the steps of the methodology
Evaluation of uncertainties Castiglioni et al., ES&T, 2013
Sampling of untreated wastewater
Sampling mode, frequency and catchments characteristics
Crucial to obtain representative samples
Sections Description
1 General information
2 Catchment properties
3-4 Sewer system
5 Lift stations in sewer system
6-8 STP influent data
9-11 Sampling point, mode and frequency
12 Calibration of flow meter
• Establish a good connection with STPs personnel
•A questionnaire was developed by Christoph Ort to collect the required information
Ort and Gujer Water Sci. Technol. 2006
Ort et al., ES&T, 2010
Castiglioni et al. ES&T. 2013
Selection of Target Residues
Excreted in consistent amounts
Detectable in wastewater
Stable in wastewater
Unique source: human
metabolism
Drug Target Residue
Analysis of Target Residues
High sensitivity (Low ng/L range) High selectivity
(unambiguous identification of an analyte)
WASTEWATER: Complex matrix Mass spectrometry allows the contemporaneous analysis of tens
of substances
Mandatory to follow quality criteria
Use of labelled compounds as internal standards
Use of at least two transitions for positives confirmation
Harmonize methods to estimate limits of detection and quantification
Stability of drug biomarkers in sewage
1. Stability in sewer systems 2. Stability during sampling, storage and analysis
Resident time in sewer 0.5-15 hours the variability is <10% Samples collection at refrigerated conditions, storage at -20°C and use of internal standards as soon as possible
References
(Castiglioni
et al., 2006)
(Gonzalez-
Marino et al.,
2010)
(Bisceglia,
2010;Bisceglia
and Lippa,
2014)
(Baker and
Kasprzyk-
Hordern, 2011)
(Castiglioni et
al., 2011)
(van Nuijs et
al., 2012)
(Plosz et
al., 2013)
(Thai et al.,
2014)
(Chen et
al., 2013)
(Senta et
al., 2014)
72 h
4 °C
pH 7.5
24 h
4 °C
pH 7.5
12 h
23 °C
pH 7.4
12 h
19 °C
pH 7.4
24 h
4 °C
pH 7.5
12 h
20 °C
pH 7.5
7 h
21 °C
pH 7.4
12 h
20 °C
pH 7.5
24 h
20 °C
pH 7.0
24 h
20 °C
pH 7.5
COC -36% -7% -50% -8% -25% -40% -60% -20% -9% -35%
BE +14% +7% +10-14% +7% +20% +6% +18% +14% NA +15%
EME* NA NA -40% NA -50% -20% -29% NA NA NA
AMP +5% +0% -15% +47% NA +3% NA NA NA -5%
METH +0% NA +0% +8% NA +2% NA 0% -5% -10%
MDMA +1% NA +0% +1% NA +3% NA 0% +1% -10%
THC-COOH -8% +2% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0%
6-MAM -14% NA -15% -42% NA -20% NA -25% -53% -15%
Back-calculation of consumption
Loads of target residues entering the plant
(g/day)
Amounts of the selected substance consumed by the population served
by the plant
Human metabolism
Correction factors
Zuccato et al. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008
Main uncertainty factor: lack of pharmacokinetic studies
Back-calculation of consumption
Illicit drugs Drug Target Residue
measured in
wastewater
Mean % of
excretion
selected
Correction
factor used for
back-calculation
Cocaine Cocaine 7.5 13
Benzoylecgonine 45
35
32.5
29
2.3
3
3.2
3.59
Amphetamine Amphetamine 30 3.3
Methamphetamine Methamphetamine 43
39
33
2.3
2.6
4.06
3,4-methylenedioxy-
methamphetamine
(MDMA)
MDMA 65
26
20
15
1.5
3.9
5
6.7
Cannabis 11-nor-9-carboxy-
delta9-
tetrahydrocannabin
ol (THC-COOH)
2.5
0.6
36.4
152
Heroin Morphine 42 3.1
6-acetylmorphine 1.3 86.9
Ketamine Ketamine
Norketamine
30
1.6
3.3
65
• Great variability among correction factors
• Lack of reliable comparison between results from different studies
1. Refine correction factors properly
2. Adoption of an homogeneous panel of correction factors
Back-calculation of consumption
Routes of
administration
Number of
studies
Number of
subjects
(range per study)
Mean Excretion
weighted by
subjects (%)
Mean
excretion
(%)
Mean
weighted
by RoA
Intranasal (IN) 9 56 (2-7) 29.4 ± 7.4
27.1 ± 11.4
29.2 ± 7.8 Intravenous (IV) 7 28 (1-7) 37.3 ± 9.6
Smoked (SM) 3 20 (5-9) 14.8 ± 5.8
Oral (O) 1 2 55 ± 7.1
New method proposed for cocaine
Study of benzoylecgonine metabolism
• Excretion profile for different route of administration • Number of subjects involved in each study • Frequency of use for each route of administration
Novel correction factor considering this mean excretion rate of BE: 3.59
Castiglioni et al. ES&T. 2013
Estimation of population size
• Population equivalents from hydro-chemical parameters BOD5, COD, total N and P, ammonium which depend from sewage composition (urban or industrial)
• Population leaving in the area (census data)
• Analysis of specific substances that can indicate univocally the persons served by a STP on the base of their known consumption/excretion
Pharmaceuticals Creatinine Cotinine and trans-3’-hydroxycotinine Cholesterol Coprostanol Caffeine Cortisol Androstenedione 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid
Conclusions
Evaluate uncertainty associated to estimation of drug use
Identify a best practice procedure to reduce or keep minimal the uncertainty of the entire procedure
Steps considered “Best practice” requirements Uncertainty (%)
Sampling Sampling mode: a) flow-proportional; b) volume proportional;
c) time-proportional (only for small flow variations)
Sampling frequency: depending on SDBs concentration variations
(population size, number of users, pharmacokinetics, operation of pump
stations)
Catchment characteristics: exfiltration, special events, layout of
STPs and sewer catchment affecting mass flux of SDBs
5-10
Chemical analysis Analytical quality: use of labelled IS, use of internal quality controls,
estimation of comparable LODs and LOQs, confirmation of positives
Interlaboratory variability and laboratory performance:
interlaboratory study (ILS) are mandatory on standards and real samples,
assessment of accuracy and biases
1-34 samples
6-26 ILS
Conclusions
Steps considered “Best practice” requirements Uncertainty (%)
Stability in sewage Sewage system: resident time of wastewater in sewer before sampling
During sampling, storage, analysis: 24h collection at refrigerated
conditions, samples acidification (pH 2), freeze samples (-20°C) or stabilize on
SPE cartridges immediately after collection
< 10
Back-calculation
of consumption
Selection of proper SDBs
Collection of excretion profiles for all the routes of administration,
weight for the number of subjects and the frequency of use
26 (cocaine case)
Estimation of
population size
Collection of all available data: estimates from hydrochemical
parameters, census data
Choose the most adequate (combination of) value case by case
with expert knowledge from experienced STP staff. Although widely available,
design capacities are not recommended, as design rules in different countries
vary and, furthermore, without knowing the planning horizon and actual
loading (recent hydro-chemical parameters), it is unknown, whether the STP
runs above or below design capacity.
7-55
Thanks
Thanks for your attention!
Paper published in ES&T
Co-authors
Sara Castiglioni
Lubertus Bijlsma,
Adrian Covaci,
Erik Emke
Félix Hernández,
Malcolm Reid,
Christoph Ort,
Kevin V Thomas,
Alexander LN van Nuijs,
Pim de Voogt,
Ettore Zuccato
EMCDDA
Paul Griffith,
Jane Mounteney,
Danica Thanki,
Liesbeth Vandam
COST Action ES1307
Potentials of the approach
Ability to provide:
Objective estimates
Qualitative and quantitative evaluation
Real-time estimates
Updated information on substance use
Be complementary to epidemiological surveys
Wastewater-Based Epidemiology