washington dc, 24 th of july 2012 model of human rights protection of sex workers exposed to forced...
TRANSCRIPT
Washington DC, 24th of July 2012
Model of human rights protection of sex workers
exposed to forced HIV/STI testing trough combination of court litigation and psycho-social
support Hajdi Shterjova Simonovikj lawyer at NGO HOPS
Skopje, Macedonia
Sex workers rights in MacedoniaHops’s experienceThe police raid and after it HOPS’s response Developing the model of free legal aid
combine with psychosocial supportResults, obsticles and challenges Conclusion
SEX WORKERS RIGHTS IN MACEDONIA
The Law stipulates that:
- the “prostitution” is misdemeanor and it is subject of a fine
- only those who are selling sex can be fined
This makes sex workers very vulnerable and exposed to violation, discrimination, stigma
- self-stigma - No trust in the system
HOPS’s experience with human rights breaches of SW
- More then 12 years work with Sex workers on the open scene in Skopje, Macedonia
- More than 7 years free legal aid for sex workers
- Sex workers in Macedonia, almost never REPORT human rights violations
- If decide to report, very often withdraw the case
- Importance of raising awareness for reporting and litigate cases of human rights violations
THE POLICE RAID AND AFTER IT
23 Sex workers unlawfully ARRESTED and DETAIND
Tested on HIV/HCV without their consent7 sex workers were CRIMINALY
CHARGED The MEDIA’s reaction
HOPS’s response
Mobilizing both national and international communities
Press releases
Documenting the case
Developing the model of legal and psychosocial support
Legal aid for sex works before the raid
Immidiate respond after the incident:- Forming a team of lawyer, outreach and social worker and
psychologist- Importance of each role in motivation process - TWO civil litigation cases were filed before the national court
by sex workers - Defending SW in criminal procedure lunched against them
The results:- 7 SW criminaly charged were not sent to prison - One of the civil cases –WON- More than 50% of detained and tested SW 3 years are
litigating agaist state institutions The Obsticles- Political and media presure- Long lasting court proceduresThe chalenges- Involving the media in a positive way- Sustainability - Peer support and activism
The results, obsticles and challenges
CONCLUSION
Promoting the success of this model nationally and regionally, in order for organizations working with marginalized groups to adopt it in motivating them to report violence and use disposable mechanisms, including litigation. These positive outcomes will empower SWs in our country to seek justice
THANK YOU