w q. pp - nrc.gov
TRANSCRIPT
.
w
|*
.
W Q. Pp' '
p '4 UNITED STATES*
'- * NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.
j je( wAsmNGToN. D. C. M56s
=y 8 b!g,
.....
DOCKET NO. o0-382
APPLICANT: LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY
FACILITY: WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3
SUBJECT: SUlttARY OF CASE LOAD FORECAST PANEL MEETING WITHAPPLICANT - WATERFORD UNIT 3
A meeting was held with the applicant, at the Waterford plant site, on4
September 19, 1978. The purpose of the meeting was to obtain informationi for use by the Forecast Panel in predicting the Waterford Unit 3 fuel load
date.
A list of those who attended this meeting is attached as Enclosure 1. Theagenda for the meeting, prepared by the applicant, is attached as Enclosure 2.The more important slides presented by the applicant are included inEnclosure 3. These slides have been given individual figure numbers.
The salient points brought out during the meeting are:
1. The plant staff will ultimately total 160. There are now 70 onthe staff, and there are 2E in operator training which beganin December 1977 and will be completed in April 1979.
2. The applicant's need for Waterford 3 is presented in graphicalform in Figures 1 and 2. This plant is needed in order tomaintain a 16% reserve on the Middle South Utilities 5ystem, of
('i
|which LP&L is one of five operating companies.
| 3. An improvement in turnaround time for design engineering workhas been realized by having Ebasco do this work at the siterather than at its home office in New York. Drawing andspecification issuances are 97*. and 98*. complete, respectively.
| 4. LP&L supports its projected fuel load date by a curve (Figure 3).| Since early in 1978 they have kept close track of actual construc-| tion acccmplishments. Although there appears to be a lag in accom-| plishment since July of this year (as shown in Figure 3), LP&L
stated that this only affected the river water intake structures!
f and was caused by high level of the river. These structures arenot on the critical path.
7811220'2 % -6i
__
~
.
.
. .
-2- ,, - .; .
The applicant also compared Waterford ,3 with similar plants. Thecomparison included time from the first concrete pouring to fuelload (Figures 4 and 5) and time from setting of the reactorvessel to fuel load (Figure 6). He also provided a comparisonof the test schedules of Waterford 3, the Yellow Book average,and that recommended in Regulatory Guide 1.68. Figure 7 showsthe critical path for construction. ,
5. LP&L proiided the following data on quantities of materialsinstalled. It should be noted that piping is consideredinstalled when it is in-place in temporary hangers andtack-welded.
.
f'- Item Quantity Quantity , peak Rate
Required Installedr Of Installation8/31 / 7_3
,
Concrete 206,000 yds. 177,000 yds.Pipe, 2 1/2" & larger 110.000 ft. 36,500 ft. 6400 ft./ month
i~ ft. , 10,000 ft.Pipe, 2" & underHangers for pipe2 1/2" & over (not v400 1300
including restraints)Exposed conduit 300,000 ft. 31,000 ft.Cable Tray 42,000 ft. 24,300 ft.Cable 4,000,000 ft. 5,000 ft. 19,000 ft./ month
Terminations 131,000 ,-0-Total craft manhours 10,800,000 5,137,000
6. As of the end of August, 89% of the procurement purchasesorders have( been placed. Of the total purchase order value, 74% ha's' been delivered.Procurement hardspots have included:
a. Structural Steelb. \ Late design of supports' f,or asymetric loadsc. . Pipe hangersd. Fan vendor quality assurance program
Ne. Electrical Equipment
7. The startup organization has been established. About 25people from LP&L and several consultants are working on thestartup program. They all report to the LP&L Lead StartupEngineer (Tom Armington), not to'their home offices.Startup schedules are being computerized and tied in withthe construction schedules. Ultimately there will be about
,
150 people- Q the startup group.
.
T'
,
,.
.
',,
,.
,
-3- % * L1
8. At'the close of the meeting, the NRC staff stated that itbelieves the applicant's May 1981 fuel load date is basedon an " aggressive" schedule. LP&L's comparison of theWaterford construction schedule to that of other plants(see Figure 5) shows comparable or slightly shorter spantimes. liowever, our past experience has shown that actualconstruction time usually exceeds that anticipated. Further,the Waterford construction critical path (see Figure 7)includes no contingencies to accomodate unforeseen events.Based on our experience with other plants, we believe thatthere may be an additional five to six months requireddue to a large amount of work yet to be done inside contain-
/ ment. However, we will go along with the May 1981 date fornow, but would like to have up-dated information, in earlyFebruary 1979, on construction accomplishments (as in Figure3), on bulk quantities (as in Item 5 above), and on criticalpath progress (as in Figure 7). The applicant agreed to providethis information.
A -
R. A. BenedictLight Water Reactors
Branch No. 2Division of Project Management
Enclosures:As Stated
( ces w/ enclosures:See next page
.
. - _ . . - _ _ . . . - -_ -. ,
..._ _ . .. _ ___ . __. - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . _ . . . _ .. __ -
'
.,
. .,
;
I Mr. D. L. Aswelli Vice President, Power Production
Louisiana Power & Light Company |,
'
142 Delaronde Street.
New Orleans, Louisiana 70174
!
: cc: W. Malcolm Stevenson, Esq.Monroe & Lemann
i 1424 Whitney BuildingNew Orleans, Louisiana 70130
i Mr. E. Blakei Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trewbridge
1800 M Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20036
?. I'
: Mr. D. B. Lester'
Production EngineerLouisiana Power & Lignt Company142 Delaronde StreetNew Orleans, Louisiana 70174
< ,
(.
||.
F
[
-------r y--- -. w. .. ._,_,_.y-,r- _ - , , ._ , , , , , , , , , _ _ , _ _ _ ._ , , , , ,, , , , , . _ , , . _ _ ,. . _ . ,
___ _ _ _ _ . _ .. _ _ _ . . _ _ . __ _ . . _ _ . _ ~ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _-
.
. .;
.
1
i'
ENCLOSURE 1 ~ 070
ATTENDANCE LISTSEPTEMBER 19, 1978 MEETING
WATERFORD UNIT 3
,
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
l Tom Armington - Lead Startup EngineerTom Gerretts - QA Manager
, Paul Jackson - Site RepresentativeDave Lester - Production Engineer (Project Manager)Lee Maurin - Waterford Unit 3 Station SuperintendentRoy Prados - Licensing
i <
EBASCO SERVICES. INC.
John Crnich - Site ManagerBart Fowler - Planning & Scheduling-
Bob Milhiser - Project TJperintendantBob Stampley - Project Manager !
;
.
NRC - STAFFt
Bob Benedict - Licensing Project Manager, DPMHerb Berkow - Program Assistant, DPMBill Lovelace - Office of Management and Program Analysis
;
Bob Stewart - Reactor Inspector, OIE, Region IV,
Joe Tappia - Inspector Intern, OIE, Region IV
i
,
.
t-- . . - . .. . -. . . - , . ~ _ _ _ - _ _ . - _ - , - - - . .- - - - _ . - - . - - . , _ ,
.
. .
*?" *73. .
ENCLOSURE 2
WATERFORD 3 NRC SCHEDULE SURVEY MEETING
I. Formal Presentation
A. IntroductionB. Purpose of Meeting (NRC)C. LP&L Power Needs and Financial StatusD. Overview of Construction Management
1. Function of Site Organizations2. Ebasco Organization3. Ebasco/ Contractor Interface
E. Construction Progress Schedules to Milestones1. Critical Path2. Schedule Comparison3. Key Schedule Indicator (Peak Accomplishments)4. Major Contractor Progress Curves
F. Design Engineeringi 1. Close-out Status
2. Work Force3. Major On-going Activities
a. FSARb. Start-up Related Workc. Extra Efforts to Facilitate Construction
4. Hard Spots- Conduit- Procurement Administration
G. Procurement1. Close-out Status2. Hard Spots
a. IEW - RC Pump and Pressurizer Supportsb. Pipe Hangersc. Buffalo Forged. Frank Electric
H. Start-up Management - Status and Schedule of Procedures(. and Testing-
I. Slide Projector Presentation of Plant
II. Tour
A. RCB ModelB. LP&L Staff BuildingC. Plant
III. Group Discussion
A. Scheduling Methods - Method of calculating percent complete,monitoring rate of progress and completion, identifying criticalpath items, corrective actions
B. Construction Statusi
I t.' . Exit Interview
__ - _ ,
4
e 8
0
NC'.' F. i??B
i
ENCLOSURE 3
PRINCIPAL SLIDES PRESENTED BY APPLICANT
.
/
4
__ _ ,___
_
.
. ..
'/-. . . , ,
ef
,! 33,0CC
HISTORICAL PROJECTED32pco -
ii 31,000
.
-
-
! 30,000,.
-
SYS*E M CwNED CR CPERIJED( 29,000 CAPAaluTY-
I-
, .2s,coe -
SYCTEM PEAx HOJRLY LCAD TREfC *--- *27,000 -
4
8 A'CTUAL PEAK H%RLY LCAD f.MSOO -
e PROJECTED PEAK HOUP' Y LCt.O ,,I 2SSOC .-
y,-24400 - ,
i '"| 23000 -
| 22,000 -.
,j zi.ooo -
2o ooc -
;..
1 19.000 -
!$ ispoC -
:"8r,eco O/i -
: ,.. . e -
*/|$ is, ooc -
G i4,CoC p-
,1 _j
MSU || 713 SOC - ':
.d *N_
-'s|1000 -
/Asopc0 - ,
*"~
9,cco -~
F /.4,000 -
|A / .-.
( 7pOO -
Ii A75400 -
'/@ LPSL .,eS,000 - ,
W /4p00
3,mo - ,.,g-a-' ' ";,.3 d2SCO e h:&h~,.
-
- *bi,000I i I i I I I I I I ! ! I I t t t '
8965 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 19 83 81 82 83 84
YEAR.
-1
MSU AND LPSL LC.*.D AND CAPAC!Tr FIGURE 1 -
i
|. i
)..
it 24 - e.,, .,,'' ,/(9
I
.*
gg
e
.20 -
w TH WATE*FC90 3 M CTKRC.*.PACITY ACCITCNSg- 1
g.
g18 -
\\
.
16 h '~
'N \-
.
$ 14 g* \wm \ ,
w \/ C 12 -
\*
>=ZO s-
10 -gwfDCff WCCRFORD 3 ASSUMING \w
0, CTW.R ACCITICN$ CN SCW.1LE N ,/o .
8 -
.
G*
6 -
,' 4 -
.
* -
( ..
f f f I 1 f
78 79 80 86 82 83 84
YEAR*.
.
0
.*
*
.
0e
. e
I*t
MIDDLE SCtJTH SYSTEM RESERVE MARGN- FIGURE 2 j. *
e
-
e ef
.
.u.
c . . {. ._ . .;. . i. L a. ._.i _p, +y,- i . _ .
ep.. *
., '.'u84
- ... . .
-
o..' - - ... ...I.
.. . . .. W.
.-. .... .il9' I
CO '' -- L - -...L . L.,.... i. ' k Mp
= ;. .. .. .
_--
. . . . . . ...-* - < t. . . . . . . e- .
i . . .. .. .*W
~;t !..
* e 3 '. ..~'*~3 : -.
6 ._
- g. .,
. .;> i i i e* .6 ..
4 '~~~~-'~~~P-~'.'=.....~~' ~ ~ i r.% ~.
2 c w.e.
! =d O!b . m
.i c..= eit - -a
<. .~.-.,- - _, ..
,
.-O .t 1 i - -- . -
'*
O4 1 M ...... ha ' ====.$
6 * *Wg e:E3 *
--C -
. -, ,--- --- 2 1.
-- mn,:
--. -. . .o - , --- r, , ,
.LaJ
I $e . . . . . . . -
_
ct2 \.
'
- . _ _
, 3,t,.,D
,, *4. ..%a -. .. .
.9... . . . . . . .
. E4.. . .. .
E . . . . . . - . .. - ;,,
gi e .6 - .e .ye
...
f IC, ,
---.._.
jI.|
*'_bn. 8! ' #'
@ 2 |Q' i-- i, - .
- - - . . .4\e. - . ' = . . . . . . . . . .% .. i -
,p. <.
cn i22 . ,. . . . - . .
e p4 e
O g,;J.
* 3 i.=.
w .- .-a<| 0
3-o ,
M 2 - }. e t- _ _ = ,
i.,:-
e . 3+
as .t t 6
= w. .._.4._,U@ 1 i
4 *3 * L.J9. -. ., . . . . . . . . , . .. 5- m...-. i*
.... i
=.=
a, g,- ,u _ 4,__ _ .. ea .e z -w s 3 \ i i *
'
M g [. Ci i i
. .. . , x . i_.=
4 .. i ! - %ggO 4, . co <!< >A.g Q 5 8 , ,e im ai s. i ! *e i . ,oy e as -e
'. *l' '
' ! ' ' 3- 'If( Q .
. 4 , ,
i , ., , , e- 36 . . . ,
;I .. . ... . . i .
L%t t 1
-ir c, *--'. dcr ,--~ i t- -' 7 - ---..
. z. . . . .-
r . . . < .
. ,ei - c.
. ., .s6 . .
*. ,r <i. . . . . i t.
% ,i r.. . i .
/ cn ,, w
s .-s, . . , i i . .
<f . ! !* e E6
631 i.- _ ... ..-_
9.--1--...._. . ._... . .
['; . ::- 3 - i_ . .- : . 1. .- . . _. .- -tr. -d .& - -- A:.,.
. . .. ...
.
p _.' . . . . .L_. . i i . . .. . m. .
;... . g.
- 3. .. ;' . . . . .=*
. y .7 f _. . .- . .. _ <
. . . . - . - . ._i(.O e i - .
! ...' J, . .W a. _.
.I i . .2 .,.,_,,,cn 6 .
,. ";'
'.I f I" 2* i .. i<g ;.
/ 3, t ..
1--
i i e
_
I.. i.
Memm-mn=num-
O O O O O O O O O O C*
O m cc 5 c sn v eq W -e.-4
IN33W3d.e.
.
s
.
9
I~
l
I
||
|
|
|
.
.
6 4
* /!..
4
- - -- _ - _ - _ __ _ - - -. . _ _. ._ _ . --____ . ____ _ _ _ _
__
'' -
r. . :-
. .- . un ,
'~ '
'
S.CHEDULE. COMPARISON '# -
.
'-
..~
1979-1982'
s- - P.W, R'S SCHEDULED FOR FUEL LOAD\
.nYELLOW BOOK CONSTRUCTION DdRATIO..Ni FIRST-CONCRETE TO FUEL LOAD'
.
..S '-,:.,
,
LEGEP!D: YELLOW DOOK SCHEDULEI I WilEN CONCRETE STARTED $/ ~]
U | '- q;jj CURiiENT YELLOW BOOK I E- m.
SCllEDULE B yo s,g g '_.
@ 6f-
U k I',- T
a 80 .
53 8 0 * ,
3g , ' , -s: >- - --- --___p,.____._______- 7.
- _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ - - -, _ _ _ __- _.-j ____
,
r 3 _.--
g g-
- .. _;' '.
w e,o - ~ ~ '' . _; -
' -. .
= .-,
- *_
~
| - - .
g_
,
*' '
y, 40 -'
s s,
o 4 w '
f 3 | $~
) { ..w
~
5 3 ||20- E
' '
.
.
'
t
C- - - -, . .-
u
att b3# :$$h$ p/ hg*g:=,'; f I ["4 jr :E/3 51.'. $ $$ $$ u$$ $ /J
5.e t ~'t_= $ g.3
|$$500;ES 1 i i ! ! i8' !73 ;3
. i i i g j" "|,2 ISID
| |-
.,
'
a-
, cousrauct.o= pTsuo?a evas aus to neucai. co.esa narious-
,, n.s sore
vcuow mocsFIGURE 4 sucser wisacoas a
'
- ..
,,. ..
.# %. '^A
., .._ . . . -.. . .. - . . . . . . . . . . . . . - , - . . .. . . . .. , , _ . . . . . . . _ , , ,.
.
.
N '' s' o G78 -,
,
> . * ..*-
. .. .
\-' *
COMPARISON OF CONSTRUCTION HAJOR--
'' ~
HILESTONES BASED ON 5/81 F.L.-..
,
.
e
Pl. ACEPROJECT lst CONC. TO START NSSS TO START COLD llYD. TOTAL
START HSSS - START COLD llYD. TO START F.L...
ST. LUCIE WI 36 HOS. 22 HOS. 11 HOS. 69 HOS.
ST. LUCIE #2 34 24 7 65*
WPPS #3 36 18 8 62.
WATERTORD #3 35.5 25 6.5 67.0
.
AVER. OF 40PWR PLANTSPER 4RC CONST. 34 28 * 8 70,
STATUS REPORT .
|L. KARL STUOV3/l/18|
* HILLSTONE #3 NOT INCLUDED IN TIIIS CATECORY DUE TO 60HONTil DURATION FOR FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS.
.
FIGURE 5-
.
. _ _ _ - . . - _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ . ______-_ ,
*# ..
. .
.. . . . . . . , . _ . . . . _ . - . , . . .. . ,, , _,
W -
Ast &' %. ( A -
Y .
'
. .NGV 3 r ,. -
.
INR SOIEDUIE 00iPARISOtl - VESSEL SEITIl0 'IO REL IIMD110 ,.
t-.. .
JULY 1978 YEllill BOOK .- A. *. -
' ~
* HARCil 1976 YEllai BOOK-
.
Sr.1101E 1* W SES 3 ST. UX:lE 2 CAllAIMY 1 SAN OtomE 2 BYPON 1 NORlli A! Cit
<0016111tX"fl0t1 ACr1VITIES
VESSEL SETTING - PRIMARV 20 FOS. 22 tOS. 23 FOS. 17.5 FOS. 27 FOS. 12 toS. 22 tOS.60GNDARV vip 1NG
STAKr UP
INITIAL FluSil (ECCSI 2.0 3 2 10 0.5 12 1.0
C0lv IlvDRO .5 0.5 1 1.5 1 2 0.5
8ASEtIHES 4.0 1.5 2 1.5 1 1 3.0
1.0 ) 5 1.00.5ItRT --
.5lidT TUNCTIONAL 1.0 1.0 3 1.5 3 -
NRC RfviEW .3.0 '3.0 2 .'5 3.5 1 2.0~
START UP TOTAL A d a.I 9.5 10 24 10 21 8.0
[J0$ 31.5 33 41.5 37 33 30.0TOTAL CONSIRilCTION iST ART-UP VURATION -VLSSLt SETTING TO CORELOAU
Fl.URE 6G
i
(.
e
a
.v . . .8 I e. a
. . . x - , %:- ?**. : " C* g,,a g e. FM,
.*- we.
,
--
2 ? j 9j|| '*%-
- 5.: .
-: 1, L | ,:, T -.-* r 3: 1
i I e-4 |9 ..** : j * .g* i --
..; w O,
==e * a h. - ' , , .;,- ! %5 he!. W**' $$ j ) . ;;
e. . W E%:: m--
o e _:-
. * . weor* -
-
j . ,
-.- 1~ ,.
--- . . . - . . . . . .-. f_ , , . _ . 4.. ,
6 e-,# p m au e= == =u. s_,
7( - W 6
. gm . . _ , y-
'.". ' _ , 5 . [m*
,.g"" g ,, ,,
D'T- T T _
I N-4"
r--o :1H. '::. . < -
'u/. -- -
ax' . -. . .
,
1 _ -.=
-
_
: : . -', a -% "Ta
,
.I - iI z. mg ;*' w ee s e.( ?e. ~ -'
t, 1O' g 'i .
2 ..',
* s _a ,s
-
-- -p
e- - : T- 1
-
t; , , ,,
t |- = '. y _v gi_
$ m{|. d
- -' . .- :
. me me d- -, , a
e - a%_
a .
_-- ' * N*
*. , , .
*s - u.a 1I
| n'***I s -)-i
1 :.,<.-, eg g
* CIC '
,
ii- P* 4
- r C- $. .C'. .I~ ? .'
*
* I ." :C.
,i. . _*" , ,. , . , ,
Q g ,
. - . , --' La.,.
e t :. ,?=. *w m . .-
: * g,, - t-- -
TI,
'=- .
I* o g '. f . _ _
' . * L. .8 :.it ,*. -
.h,! '$ ' ., | 0 *
," ~- -t i *.i
-- -- -- "_ _" *h A -' 3 ? E8
e. . -E Y .
_3' }pd 3
4j- '
| * I |T E .*'
| 6 :' g- u
I- = __
:[ - ! i $
h,*3II =
*j !.a
A f: ,; -" ''.m g
. ,_.
-.. .- u; . - ;-
r- -> ,, ., s- a 5
- -Y-
g .= *'
'
_ ;.~ _ W|-"T
s F - - 7 ; =.
s ' :4 w i| v= _..- - _
| .i |1 4 $ %4. [I | [b de'..
I '~ ,'[ *--3 e-; *b-' ,.* , =i - . ,
. d
i g,.
-l.
h _. .
. , . . ' .i,* t w ty,.
,
." -~ ~
.L .. ,.\ .
"# #
n<- -
2 ss' T8 - . .e*1 - 9
- - 7.
US'
s'*
| JA% - t.6 , .
., g- .4 .
* 1g *L 's. ., a -*>
Qy '' ' W|'' " ..' am
.
4 *: . -
.* 1 ~
D'hi.= -
- ,
| | I*.
s .4 =| |i,
N N. , j '
' **_
....
[.. ZE; ;tI . , .
-
: .a .a I' *
- a i _-i. L - te .
,'
-' .! ,
) 2 * Ce*-e& &a- ,
.8 gd
}., ..,.
. 5 : io #;! .I . %.e i - % *.. _.' # '
. --
!--
Q9
; r 42 1 4 >- 43.,,,
-
u - . --. J.
P