vuyk_1.doc  · web viewalbert einstein couldn’t accept niels bohr’s uncertainty of quantum...

49
archived as http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Vuyk_1.doc [pdf] more on Physics at http://www.stealthskater.com/Science.htm note: because important websites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was archived from http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/ on April 15, 2002. This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned website. Indeed, the reader should only read this back-up copy if it cannot be found at the original author's site. the outlines of a "Theory of Everything" with Cosmological and Philosophical implications How a Chiral Quantum Vacuum and "Big Bang- entanglement" could lead to a causal reconciliation of Quantum Mechanics, Relativity, Consciousness, and Free Will. by Leo Vuyk . © 2-29-2000 ([email protected] Version 16, March-24- 2002) Contrary to Eastern philosophy, in Western (Cartesian ) philosophy it is a real shock to accept the idea that we humans couldn’t have a singular private Self (or that the private Self is a quantum mechanical illusion ). check http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/leo_intro.htm#postscr ipts Abstract 1

Upload: others

Post on 17-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

archived as http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Vuyk_1.doc [pdf]

more on Physics at http://www.stealthskater.com/Science.htm

note: because important websites are frequently "here today but gone tomorrow", the following was archived from http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/ on April 15, 2002. This is NOT an attempt to divert readers from the aforementioned website. Indeed, the reader should only read this back-up copy if it cannot be found at the original author's site.

the outlines of a "Theory of Everything"with Cosmological and Philosophical implications

How a Chiral Quantum Vacuum and "Big Bang-entanglement" could lead to a causal reconciliation of Quantum Mechanics,

Relativity, Consciousness, and Free Will.

by Leo Vuyk . © 2-29-2000 ([email protected] Version 16, March-24-2002)

Contrary to Eastern philosophy, in Western (Cartesian ) philosophy it is a real shock to accept the idea that we humans couldn’t have a singular private Self (or that the private Self is a quantum mechanical illusion).

check http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/leo_intro.htm#postscripts

Abstract

Albert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics should therefore be judged as an incomplete theory.

In this paper, a deeper and causal understanding of QM, Relativity, and Uncertainty is proposed. Uncertainty is supposed to be originated by a new type of Oscillating Quantum Vacuum and a new type of entanglement -- coined Big Bang Entanglement (BBE) -- acting between spatial separated anti-copy universes.

The new vacuum is supposed to resemble a complex 3-D space frame lattice on the Planck scale. The linear space frame lattices represent linear energetic oscillations of real non-zero sized vacuum particles. These vacuum particles can change form by mutual collision processes and collisions with quarks and leptons into other "elementary" particle forms. The energy of the vacuum particle oscillations is assumed to be the only energy source in the Universe. Force-carrying particles (photons, gluons etc.) are supposed to influence the oscillatory energy of these vacuum particles, which propagates through the vacuum with the local speed-of-light.

However, each vacuum oscillation in our Universe should be compensated by its copy oscillation in our anti-mirror universe, together adding up to Zero Energy. Consequently, the

1

Page 2: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

origin of all these vacuum oscillations must be found in some sort of bow tension of these vacuum particles (which should have been evaporated smoothly in dual BBE guided symmetry) out of a new semi-cold Big Bang nucleus. Standard models tell us that the Big Bang should be infinitely hot. However, if the energy of the BBE dual anti-mirror universes is zero, there is reason to postulate a semi-cold Big Bang.

The BBE is supposed to be constantly synchronizing all the individual twin particles such as vacuum particles and elementary non-zero sized twin quark and lepton particles. However, these particles are living apart in dual-spatial separated copy anti-mirror universes.

The anti-mirror twin- particles are supposed to be their alternate instantaneous EPR correlated "conscious observers outside the system" (i.e., outside each other's universe). They alternately initiate the collapse of each other's wave functions. Thus these twin particles have a fully random alternate object-subject–observer relation. In Quantum Mechanics, the Self of the observer is connected to human beings. This has led to strange ideas about "living and dead cats" (i.e., Schroedinger cat) and the well-known idea that the Moon should only shine if it is observed by humans. In this model, "collapse of the wave function" is INDEPENDENT of human measurement or observation -- with an exception for human volition and action itself. Consequently, the Universe is described as a Quantum Mechanical Dual Conscious Universe.

In contrast with Einstein’s "God plays no dice", it is postulated that God does play with real entangled twin dice -- the elementary non-zero sized particles, and the energetic oscillating particle-based chiral vacuum lattice. The linear energetic oscillating vacuum particles transfer wave-information to each other by the nodes connecting these lattices. The local oscillation frequency of these vacuum particles is the base for mass connected local "potential spacetime", which mimics Einstein’s space-time.

"Potential space-time" equals the space-time description according to John Bell’s interpretation of Special Relativity, (including preferred vacuum reference frames [1]), combined with the effects of the so-called LASOF (described in this paper). Like God's dice, the real particle (die) FORM and structure, spin, and continuous collisions are the origin of the universal fine-tuning and choices that Nature makes. This is the origin of a logic-based uncertainty and a causal clockwork Universe. In line with the prediction of Stephen Hawking, we will not be able to predict the Future caused by the enormous complexity of this bouncing machine called "Universe". So the complexity is the origin of this uncertainty.

However, all these dice and vacuum oscillations are also dual universal correlated by Big Bang entanglement, which introduces an extra uncertainty to uncertainty. Thus God plays dice on multiple dual-non-local EPR correlated universal tables. And probably on more than 2 tables (i.e., universes).

Every wave (the additional vacuum particle oscillation) or spinning real particle (quarks and leptons) is non-local EPR correlated with its distant dual anti-universal copy wave or particle. The micro time fluctuations and tiny differences in position and speed on the Planck scale between these spinning or oscillating particles are the causal origin of real uncertainty. Thus, these fluctuations are supposed to be the origin of the alternate --but fully at random-- initiating of the collapses of each other's wave functions.

Non-locality combined with only discrete quantum processes, seems to be the ruling principle in these dual EPR-correlated universes. Even waves are interpreted here as additional vacuum

2

Page 3: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

particle oscillations. Consequently, in contrast with standard Quantum Mechanics, each wave or particle has always a precise position also before a measurement is made. The energetic oscillating vacuum space frame lattice is the origin of our lack of knowledge of the actual location of particles and (single photon or neutrino) waves before measurement. Consequently, when we measure the position of an electron, the measurement occurs at the moment this electron interacts with the closest atom in the detector OR slightly after the moment the EPR correlated anti-mirror electron in the opposite universe interacts with his closest atom over there. Particles and waves can still be described by Schroedinger equations. Howevemr particles and waves are always precisely located (i.e., they don’t "spread out" as suggested by standard Quantum Mechanics).

Key words: TOE, GUT, ZPE, MWI, Many Worlds Interpretation, Quantum gravity, BBE, Big Bang Entanglement, Dual Universal EPR Correlation, Fractal Big Bang, Massless Black Hole, Chiral Quantum Vacuum Lattice, Dark energy, Dark Matter, Gamma Ray Bursts, Sagnac effect, Schnoll effect, Poponin/Gariaev Phantom effect, LASOF ellipsoid, Dual Conscious Universe, Free Will, D.M. Eigler, E. Podkletnov, Frank Tipler, Benjamin Libet, Rupert Sheldrake, Rene Descartes.

Introduction

We could imagine the dual anti-mirror universes as being each other's projection through a converging lens. If we imagine to place so-called "double slit experiments" on both sides of this lens and mark the corresponding slits 'A' and 'B' respectively, then after we combine these experiments into one experiment, the mystery of double slit experiments is explained. The photon which passed slit 'A' (in our universe) interferes with its dual universal BBE-correlated (anti-mirror shadow) particle, which passed in our perspective through slit 'B' by the anti-mirror symmetry relation.

There is even reason to suggest that these anti-mirror particles are present in or around each real particle. I suggest that in so-called "single photon interference events" (e.g., double slit experiments), the photonic wave function does not split in 2 equal halves. Instead, these photons seem to be able to split into different anti-mirror wave functions representing 2 different particles -- a shadow particle (also-called "mirage") and a real particle. In the same way, quarks and leptons can split into 2 different (anti-mirror) shadow and real non-zero sized particles which can be described by their own anti-mirror wave functions. If these shadow and real particles (or shadow and real photons) reunite appropriately after passing a double slit, single-particle interference will occur. Each quark, lepton, and boson should be somehow escorted by its own anti-mirror companion (shadow) particle. So-called "mirage" (i.e., shadow) Cobalt particles were recently found in elliptical quantum corrals by Dr. D. M. Eigler IBM (see "Quantum Mirage Effect (QME)"

http://www.almaden.ibm.com/almaden/media/image_mirage.html ).

These mirage Cobalt particles seem to have a 1/3 weaker intensity than the original Cobalt particle. Recent so-called "muon g-2" anomaly measurements suggest also that the muon could have a "super symmetric" partner escort particle which influences its magnetic moment (see: http://phyppro1.phy.bnl.gov/g2muon/index.shtml ).

At first glance this model could be described as an adapted superstring theory based on a torus particle form (type IIB ) combined with the Wholistic Dual Universal implications of a new non-local EPR interpretation.

3

Page 4: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

According to superstring theory, the property of an elementary particle (mass/energy and force charges) is determined by the constant energetic jittering of its specific internal non-zero sized "resonant vibrational pattern". However in this model, I introduce a deeper dual-materialistic- geometrical origin of vibrational patterns of particles. Quarks and leptons (neutrinos excluded) are supposed to have different "sub-quantum propeller alike forms". They are really "spinning around with at least 2 spin axes. And they are powered by the oscillatory pushing power (energetic linear jittering) of torus shaped vacuum particles.

2 torus formed vacuum particles can change form by mutual collision into propeller-formed electron-positron pairs with different (left or right) pitch (pair production). They stop to oscillate and start to spin by collisions with the energetic oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum particles themselves. The vacuum particles are supposed to oscillate in a 3-D chiral space frame lattice with an incomplete chiral octahedron/tetrahedron configuration. As a result, the property of a spinning particle is determined by the interaction between its real complex propeller form and the local specific (variable) oscillatory properties of the vacuum particles (which is the base for real so-called "Lorentz transformations").

Quarks and Leptons (the electron/positron and neutrinos excluded) are supposed to be compound particles (see page in http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/leo_intro.htm#postscripts )with at least 1 electron or positron as a base, combined with 1-or-2 photon particles. This system is the main origin of different particle masses, charge, and magnetic moment etc. Vacuum particles are supposed to be able to change form (by collision with quarks and leptons) into different photon particle types with different specific non-propeller like form. (There are 6 types -- see below.)

The property of photons and neutrinos is supposed to be based on the hypothesis that the lifetime of such a hard-rock photon or neutrino particle is very short. After a short trajectory (1 cm), the photonic particle is supposed to change its form back into the form of a vacuum particle. And the photonic energy is continued by its photonic wave in the form of additional jittering of the vacuum oscillation (causal Particle-Wave duality).

As a result, I propose a hidden order in Quantum Mechanics based on different particle Forms. Special Relativity should be extended with the implications of these energetic oscillating vacuum reference frame effects, which should be measurable by experiment (see below -- the LASOF).

The former dissident ideas are not new because they combine some old dissident ideas of 5 well-known physicists, together with a new Dual-Universal Big Bang without broken symmetry and a new Dual Universal EPR (Einstein, Podolski and Rosen) correlation model coined "Big Bang Entanglement". As a surprising result, even human Consciousness could be explained on the same base!

It was Abdus Salam who proposed that elementary particles should have a sub-quantum level structure, and that they are compound hardrock particles with a specific non-zero sized form. Jean Paul Vigier postulated that quarks and leptons are "pushed around" by an energetic sea of vacuum particles in quantum space. David Bohm suggested (in contrast with the "Copenhagen interpretation") that reality is not created by the eye of the human observer, and also that elementary particles should be "guided by a pilot wave". John Bell argued that the motion of mass related to the surrounding vacuum reference frame should originate real "Lorentz-transformations". Richard Feynman was one of the scientists who postulated the idea of an all-pervading energetic quantum vacuum. He rejected it after all because it should originate resistance for every mass in motion, relative to the reference frame of the quantum vacuum.

4

Page 5: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

However, the strange and counterintuitive possibility is postulated that this quantum vacuum resistance for mass in motion can be compensated by the quantum vacuum itself ONLY if we combine the ideas of Vigier, Bell, Bohm, Salam, and a new dual universal Bohmian-like "pilot wave", which is interpreted as the EPR correlation (or Big Bang entanglement) between individual elementary anti-mirror particles, living in dual spatial separated universes.

According to modern physics, the EPR correlation mechanism predicts that each elementary particle that came out of the Big Bang had a counterpart (anti-mirror spinning and charged) particle which was EPR correlated. These EPR correlations should now be "washed out" due to a not well-understood "decoherence" and annihilation mechanism, which created the so-called "broken symmetry" of our material Universe. However, this model predicts that the EPR correlated anti-mirror symmetry between particles is still there in the form of dual universal symmetry synchronizing mechanism called "Big Bang entanglement" which should exist between dual spatial separated copy universes.

As a result, these ideas introduced a new ontology of physics and a new particle-wave-vacuum principle. The vacuum is supposed to be filled up with real so-called non-zero sized energetic oscillating so-called "Higgs-virgin particles" (i.e., dark energy). These linear oscillations should have the Planck length (10-35cm), and are supposed to be the base of a quantum space frame with the geometry of an incomplete complex chiral space frame lattice. By comparing different real 3-D octa-/tetrahedron lattice models, it came out that there are at least 2 possible chiral lattice models possible -- with a left- and a right hand spiraling geometry.

new causal Particle-Wave duality

It is postulated that photon particles are created by transformation of vacuum particles due to collision of these vacuum particles with quarks and leptons. Photon particles are postulated to travel over a distance of ca. 1-cm with the speed-of-light (related to the light source) in the form of a real particle. After a 1-cm flight, the photon particle will change its form back again into an oscillating vacuum particle, and change its properties into a wave form which is interpreted as an extra vacuum oscillation of the vacuum particles. However, this extra vacuum oscillation will travel with the speed-of-light relative to the local vacuum frame.

In the past, maser experiments were used to prove Einstein’s Special Relativity by so-called "one-way light-speed experiments". These maser experiments are just light-speed experiments made within circa a 1-cm range and therefore in line with this 1-cm flight boundary. (See the well known maser experiment of Cedarholm and Townes [2].) At the same time, the well known Babcock and Bergman experiment [3] proved a very small but structural light-speed anomaly by fast moving (rotating) glass windows only on average 0,7 % of the trajectory (1.4 m) in which the light was moving unreflected in vacuum after leaving the fast rotating mirror. Thus, it is supposed that we may calculate that photons should have a speed relation to the (fast rotating) source only over ca. 1-cm distance (0,7/100x140).

However, GPS one-way light speed experiments do prove no light speed differences in any direction relative to the Earth in its motion through the vacuum. Consequently, the only causal solution is postulated that the quantum vacuum creates its own isotropic light speed bubble (reference frame) around the Earth for distances larger than 1-cm -- coined the LASOF ("Local A-symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame" - see below). This bubble is non-rotating around the Earth itself, which is the origin for all so-called "Sagnac effects". At the same time, it is suggested that the ether drift experiments of Dayton Miller (see http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm 1926) prove that in spite of the "LASOF" effect, there still exists a small indication of the ether.

5

Page 6: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

These features introduced a new type of dual-quantum-correlated mass-less black hole and a Symmetric Semi-Cold Fractal Big Bang model, which is supposed to be the explosion/evaporation in succession of an earlier so-called "Big-Crunch". Quantum Mechanics and the well-known EPR correlation laboratory experiments suggest that there is always 100% correlation (or anti-mirror symmetry) between particle pairs -- which are created by a "common" source and measured at the same moment -- no matter how far these particles are separated (including the width of the Universe!).

The Semi-Cold Fractal Big Bang mechanism is supposed to be the "common" source of pairs of synchronized, EPR correlated or Big Bang Entangled particles living in different dual (anti-mirror, spatial separated ) universes. As a result, all particles and waves will participate in this Big Bang entangled guiding system which we may call "consciousness on the quantum level".

Surprisingly, I could relate astronomical structures and cosmological phenomena like Dark Matter and Dark Energy, Schroedinger’s Cat paradox, Consciousness, Free Will, and even the illusion of the Private Self with this new Dual-Multi-Universal model.

It is postulated that the oscillating quantum vacuum is cheating us by mimicking the constant speed-of-light (Special Relativity) with the aid of 3 more-or-less combined principles.

1: A new "wave-particle transition" principle on short distances up to 1-cm, which is the supposed to be origin of the null result of NH3-maser one-way light speed experiment (by Cedarhom and Townes [2]) and the 0,7% light speed correlation with fast-moving glass windows over a trajectory of 1.4 meter in the Babcock and Bergman experiment [3].

2: A new "Local A-symmetrical Oscillating Vacuum Frame" (LASOF) principle -- which can be described as an "isotropic light speed bubble" around the Earth -- which is the origin of the Sagnac effect and the null result of "one-way" satellite light-speed measurements. 6 experiments are suggested to verify this model in the future.

anti-Relativity GPS "one-way" light-speed test outside the "LASOF Ellipsoids"

One of the future experiments to check this model is based on the prediction that it should be possible to measure "some" influence of the speed of the Earth through the Solar vacuum reference frame by special "one way" GPS signaling speed measurements. This is very dissident to predict because it is a prediction against the key features of Einstein’s Special Relativity. This experiment has to be done more-or-less outside the influence of the so-called "LASOF Ellipsoids" or "Local a-symmetric Oscillating Higgs-virgin Frame" (see LASOF Ellipsoids below), which is originated by the interaction of the Earth with the oscillating vacuum lattice. The Solar vacuum frame is supposed to be anchored around the Sun and is not rotating around the Sun relative to the Galaxy center.

This experiment can be done by measuring the difference in the signaling speed between 2 GPS satellites at the moment that these satellites are able to exchange signals in the up or down (vacuum wind) direction of the motion of the Earth (30 km/sec.) around the Sun. Thus it is proposed to measure the signal speed difference between 2 GPS satellites in a direction which is chosen more-or-less PARALLEL with the axis of the Earthly propagation around the Sun, to check the influence on the measurement of the speed of the Earth (30 km/second) relative to the Solar reference frame.

the "LASOF Ellipsoids" or "isotropic light speed bubble" around the Earth6

Page 7: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

In spite of all the "one-way tests of light-speed isotropy" made in history (which are all consistent with Special Relativity), it is obvious that these experiments do not account for a "isotropic light speed bubble" around the Earth or the "photon transition" after 1 cm (described below in this text). If satellite "one-way" light-speed experiments show periodic (light-speed) variations, they are mentioned as a problem, together with insufficient agreement in results which "remain to be settled". According to this model, the Earth is cruising through an oscillating vacuum reference frame centered around the Sun. In the neighborhood of mass concentrations (e.g., the Earth), it is postulated that the speed of the photonic wave function expands a-symmetrically relative to this reference frame in a complex non-isotropic way, with the result that the Earth in motion is equipped with its own reference frame, which is supposed to have the special form of a double ellipsoid. This double ellipsoid or non-isotropic oscillating vacuum frame we will call the "Local A-Symmetric Oscillating Higgs-virgin Frame (LASOF)", which is supposed to have a double elliptic form.

The two LASOF ellipsoid areas are supposed to have aligned major symmetry axes with a "tight fit" of both "ellipsoid noses" around the Earth -- one in front and one at the backside of the Earth relative to its motion around the Sun. The major symmetry axis of the ellipsoids is pointing parallel in to the direction of the motion of the Earth around the Sun. The tight fit of the LASOF ellipsoids around the Earth is supposed to be the origin of the possibility to measure the speed of the Earth in the reference frame of the Sun by GPS signal speed measurements. A-symmetric oscillation in a LASOF means that the Higgs-virgin oscillations -- measured in different lattice directions -- have a different anti-symmetric sinusoidal form related to the time-base.

The Higgs-virgin particles are oscillating in a chiral complex lattice with the Planck length as a base. The Solar vacuum lattice should be interpreted as a reference frame which is locally fixed to its so-called "anchor black hole" system. In our case, we may call this the "solar dual anchor black hole system" which has the form of a "dumbbell". This interpretation is in contrast with contemporary cosmology. In YOUNG stars, these anchor black holes are spotted and nowadays described as glowing caps or bow shocks at the end of the dual jets (see: HH 34:

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap991129.html ). We noticed that in DYING stars (in planetary nebula), these anchor black holes are also often visible as bipolar bow shocks (see M2-9: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap990321.html ).

We suppose that this LASOF is the main reason why so-called first order (one-way) light velocity measurements with the Global Positioning System are only accurate if the measurement direction from the Satellites is directed more-or-less perpendicular to the Earth surface. GPS measurement directions which have an Earth surface angle of less than 30 degrees become often inefficient, mainly due to the distortion of the light-speed represented by this LASOF. As a result, the rotational Earth velocity around the sun relative to the solar reference frame should be measurable by future one-way velocity experiments of the GPS. (The so-called "Sagnac effect" -- which is originated by the Earth rotation itself -- is already converted in the GPS system)

As a consequence, this model is in MEASURABLE DISCORDANCE with Einstein’s Special Relativity which says that light will always travel at a constant rate regardless of the frame of reference. The Higgs-virgin cosmos mimics most -- but not all -- the predictions of Special and General Relativity which lead to several realistic falsifying or supporting tests for this model.

Local Potential Space-time

7

Page 8: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

The LASOF is reason to describe time and space-time different than Einstein did. The local oscillation frequency of Higgs-virgin vacuum particles is the base for mass connected local "potential space-time". Which is different from Einstein’s space-time. Potential space-time equals the "space-time" description according to John Bell’s interpretation of Special Relativity, including preferred vacuum reference frames [1] but without the contraction (of rods) hypothesis because this would be not in line with the LASOF (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame).

The LASOF influences the local oscillation pattern of vacuum particles. These oscillations are responsible for the jittering pattern of mass carrying particles and thus the exact ticking rate of atom clocks. Time is a true happening jittering process of particles inside atoms which we can measure. Consequently, the jittering pattern of vacuum particles -- together with the absolute speed of a mass through this vacuum reference frame -- is the origin of time and mass. These time and mass effects are mimicking the Relativity rules.

6. Tests

1: The preferred vacuum frame is testable by an adapted Michelson and Morley experiment made in a fast-moving space probe. To check for possible contraction effects, one of the 2 "light arms" of the apparatus could be equipped with a bundle of glass fibers. The light should be guided up-and-down through this bundle of parallel ordered glass fibers because the light-speed inside these bundles is not influenced by the speed of the space probe in the vacuum space frame (thus will be constant). In this space probe case, the LASOF is supposed to be not active. It is supposed to be only active around massive objects like the Earth.

2: The LASOF oscillating vacuum frame should have a diurnal subtle influence on radiation intensities of synchrotron rings measured up -and-down the radiation direction, which is most in line with the propagation direction of the Earth around the Sun.

3: The difference in the signaling speed between 2 GPS satellites -- measured parallel with the Earthly propagation direction around the Sun -- outside the LASOF area. The very faint indications for an ether drift measured by Dayton Miller (see http://www.orgonelab/miller.htm )should tell us that the ether drift effect on Earth is not 100% suppressed by the LASOF in combination with an hypothetical counteracting contraction mechanism.

4: The quantum weirdness of source entanglement is testable by an adapted alternative Stern-Gerlach experiment with single evaporated silver atoms. (see "source entanglement", app. p. .42 ,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ).

5: The existence of dual cooperating "Anchor Black Holes" (mainly located outside Galaxies and at either sides of the Solar planetary plane, located at the polar axis) is supposed to be the origin of dark matter and testable by future evidence for 2 clear micro lensing events very near to us (app.p. 36-39,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix34 ).

6: Big Bang entanglement in Big Bang entangled human decision-making could be measured by more complex and detailed Benjamin Libet experiments (see app. P. 46,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ).

Humans

8

Page 9: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

We humans are quantum mechanical systems who are only able to follow the quantum mechanical rules of the Universe, which we merely partly know and understand. Consequently, we have to search and innovate these rules to find out who we are and how Reality can be described ontologically. Our understanding of the World is restricted by an ontological gap between scientific language and reality. Therefore, we have to search for a bridge. This paper is an attempt to describe possible outlines of that bridge.

I postulate that the basic features of the Universe must be of a type that allows the evolution of dual mirror symmetric, EPR-correlated observers outside the "system". Which means that we and elementary particles are always correlated by "instantaneous action at-a-distance" acting between dual correlated universes. If we take a Chiral Quantum Mechanical Universe as a "system", then the Universe that we know is only a half-truth without a "broken symmetry". And we should have a mutual observer and guiding relation with at least one spatial separated anti-mirror universe.

Consequently, the so-called "superposition- and collapse events" in the Universe are only the half truth. All these events are based on "instantaneous information flow" (called "actions at a distance" or "Big Bang entanglement") between at least 2 spatial separated events in different universes. Even if we measure a collapse event in the laboratory between "local" related particles in an EPR experiment (which is also supposed to have an instantaneous non-local collapse relation), this dual universal "BB entanglement" should be also present on top of it.

Then I suggest that each elementary particle is instantaneous observed and/or guided without the time for "reflection" by its distant shadow anti-particle in our dual anti-mirror universe. The difference with human choices is supposed to be that humans are equipped with enough time for "reflection" (retarded EPR correlation or retarded Big Bang entanglement) to develop what we call "Free Will" by vetoing urges and intentions (Benjamin Libet), and become aware of moral differences and even altruism.

Consequently if this increase in reflection time is related to the evolutionary increase of complexity of cells, the goal of human evolution seems to be the creation of moral awareness, made by animate dual synchronized logic quantum computers with enough time for "reflection" like our dual synchronized brains. Thus: Descarte’s: "I think, therefore I am" should change into: "I am a QM system, which is always non-local instantaneous EPR correlated and in competition for Free Will with my opposite anti-I, living in a dual anti-mirror universe. Therefore, We are! We are dual co-authors of our common life."

John Bell’s interpretation

However, in this context, the Quantum Vacuum and Special Relativity seem to be only compatible if we take the "John Bell (Lorentz ) interpretation" of Special Relativity for granted, which is less elegant and less simple (i.e., the Occam’s Razor criterion) than Einstein postulated (see: [1] ). Secondly, I found that there is evidence of an historical misinterpretation of the 2 famous experiments of Babcock & Bergman and of Cedarholm & Townes. There is even reason to postulate a preferred reference frame more-or-less centered around the Sun, which doesn’t show up in the GPS one-way light-speed measurements due to a so-called "LASOF" effect of the quantum vacuum connecting the light-speed to the Earth (see below -- the "LASOF").

9

Page 10: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

If, at the same time, Nature at the quantum level is more complex than we thought due to nonzero-sized oscillating vacuum particles and a crystalline EPR correlated chiral vacuum, then a new physics arises which is testable in at least 6 different ways.

10

Page 11: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

Stephen Hawking explains in A Brief History of Time:

"We could still imagine that there is a set of laws that determines events completely for some supernatural being who could observe the present state of the Universe without disturbing it. However, such models of the Universe are not of much interest to us mortals. It seems better to employ the principle known as "Occam’s razor" and cut all the features of the theory which cannot be observed."

I think we could change Hawking’s statement a little. If we change "for some supernatural being" into "by EPR non-local instantaneous correlation between dual anti-mirror universes with a chiral vacuum", then this model is of real interest to us mortals. However, probably we need modern mathematical stuff like Operator algebra, Poisson manifolds, K-theory, Lie-groupoids, Lie-algebroids, and von Neumann algebras etc. to prove these ideas.

Successful experiments carried out to test the famous "Bell theorem" (e.g., A. Aspect 1982) demonstrated that Quantum Mechanics is non-local. It is demonstrated that there is "instantaneous action at-a-distance" between events that have a common cause. And the Bell theorem only applies to events that have a common cause. If the Big Bang is true, then Bell’s theorem may imply that everything that ever originated in the Big Bang maintains its so-called EPR correlation which has to be also "instantaneous action at-a-distance". Consequently, on top of the contemporary rules of physics, I suggest that there was no "broken symmetry" after the Big Bang. And EPR correlations left over from the Big Bang are still guiding us and even all elementary particles in our Universe, which is instantaneous non-local EPR correlated with at least one synchronized identical real anti-mirror universe.

These universes have to be spatially separated and are supposed to be each other's "observers". The quantum vacuum is supposed to play a crucial role in the origin of matter or anti-matter, energy, mass, gravit,y and the deterministic role of non-local correlated forms of particles. God really plays dice with real 3-D formed dice: the quarks, leptons and bosons which are supposed to posses real physical 3-D form at the moment they interact. Nature is -- by these 3-D particle forms (which could be interpreted as a kind of hidden variables) -- fully deterministic combined with real random collision of particles for non-DNA based matter. Animate matter is semi-deterministic. It seems to have more-or-less the possibility of choice by "veto action" (or reflection) due to a sort of retarded transactional EPR correlation between dual copy universes.

the Feynman idea

This paper is in its origin based on a simple Quantum Mechanical idea suggested by the great Richard P. Feynman. In his book the Character of Physical Law (p.37-39), he wrote: "Suppose that in the World, everywhere there are a lot of (space filling vacuum-) particle, flying through us at very high-speed. They come equally from all directions just shooting by. And once in a while, they hit us in a bombardment. We -- and the Sun -- are practically transparent for them. "Practically" … but not completely. Some of them hit. Look at what would happen…

"If the Earth is moving, it is running into the particles coming towards it and away from the ones that are chasing it from behind. So more particles will hit from the front than from the back, and there will be a (vacuum) force opposing any motion. This force would slow the Earth up in its orbit. Which is proved to be not the cas, so that is the end of that theory! Well, you say, it was a good one and I got rid of the mathematics for a while. Maybe I could invent a better one."

11

Page 12: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

However, in contrast with Richard Feynman, we suggest that Nature may compensate such an opposing vacuum force if (1) these Feynman vacuum particles possess a new kind of Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) in the form of energetic high-speed oscillations, and (2) the elementary particles of the Earth have the ability -- by Bell’s real Lorentz transformation which I call "Lorentz polarization" -- to absorb just enough of this Zero-Point Energy in the right direction to stay put against the opposing vacuum force. This is done by real "Lorentz transformation" relative to the reference frame (which I will call "Lorentz polarization") and a dual universal EPR correlation between these polarized particles, which acts as a memory. However, if only 2 correlated particles would be responsible for this memory, then there is 50% chance of influencing this polarization by small individual particle fluctuations.

This is reason to suggest that there must be more correlated universes than 2 in order to keep this memory in tact. Thus I postulate that the Earth is pushed by the oscillating particles of the vacuum as a compensation for the resistance originated by the Earth’s velocity through the vacuum reference frame, which is anchored around the Sun itself. (For contemporary ZPE, see: H. E. Puthoff,

http://www.ldolphin.org/energetic.html ; B. Haisch and A. Rueda,http://www.calphysics.org/questions.html .)

Vigier-Bohm and Salam ideas

These suggestions seem to be not so strange because it combines 2 different quantum mechanical solutions suggested by David Bohm and Jean Paul Vigier described in Infinite Potentials -- the time and lives of David Bohm (1996) by D. Peat. Quotations: (1) "D. Bohm argued that the quantum potential (also dubbed 'pilot wave') guides the electron in a non-mechanical way." (In this paper, I will use this idea which may be compared with 'Big Bang entanglement'.) (2) J.P.Vigier favored explaining the process in terms of some sort of underlying mechanism as an energetic sub-quantum fluid "pushing the electron around". {In this new physical model, I will call this sub-quantum fluid the energetic oscillating "Higgs-virgin vacuum"}. (3) Abdus Salam considered together with Jogesh Pati in 1974 that quarks and leptons are made out of 8 compound Preons (4 chromons, and 4 Flavons).

If quarks and leptons (neutrinos excluded) are able to absorb directional energy from the vacuum, they should have knowledge at any time about their speed and direction in space. The solution this paper suggests is to re-introduce the not-so-weird idea of universal symmetry by postulating the very weird idea of the existence of synchronized "Dual anti mirror Universes", which are EPR correlated what I will call: Big Bang entangled down to the Planck scale.

As a consequence, the Second Law of Thermodynamics has to be interpreted as to be valid only at the same time in both Universes. Everything -- even YOURSELF -- has to be interpreted as non-Cartesian DUALLY EXISTENT. The Cartesian "Cogito Ergo Sum" ("I think, therefore I am") has to be changed into: " I am a QM system, which is always non-local instantaneous EPR correlated and in time competition for free will with my opposite anti-I. Therefore, We are! (alternating non-marionettes)" -- see "Tests" above, Libet)

To quote Feynman again: "Well, you say, it was a good one and I got rid of the mathematics for a while. THIS IS TOO STRANGE TO BE TRUE."

12

Page 13: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

However, in contrast again, the idea was put a step further by suggesting:

(1) That all matter, energy, and motion in the Universe is originated by energetic oscillating Higgs-virgin particles, which have real form (or configuration) and a non-zero volume. They are suggested to oscillate in 3-Dimensional local vacuum lattice frames, which can be qualified as preferred vacuum frames.

2: That each quark and lepton (neutrinos excluded) has a real complex sub-quantum-level form and is able to spin due to collision with vacuum particles.. This particle spin can be polarized (called spin polarization) by which the particle is able to absorb directional vacuum energy. The spin polarization has a Lorentz-covariant MEMORY for its direction and magnitude in Higgs-virgin space. This memory is instantaneously synchronized by EPR correlations (called: Big Bang entanglement) with its anti-mirror particle, living in a real Dual anti-mirror universe located outside our own Universe.

As a consequence, this model points into the direction of a Universe that is at the same time MECHANISTIC (by oscillating colliding and spinning real particles) and WHOLISTIC (by BB entanglement acting at different levels of existence). The determination of particle states at the Planck scale (which could be called the base of existence) should be interpreted as a very complex Dual Universal process -- mechanistic with hidden variables and wholistic at the same time.

Many Worlds Interpretations

There are more "Many Worlds" Interpretations. David Deutsch wrote: "Experiments have confirmed Quantum Physics. And the Many Worlds Interpretation (MWI) is the only known non-paradoxical interpretation of it. All these many worlds are real, and I am in one of them. The Universe is described by a wave equation. Essentially, the equation says that at each moment of time, the world (Universe) can split into Many Worlds. Each world is one of the possible things that can happen at that point. And these worlds are interacting with each other. This is the 'Many Worlds' interpretation of Quantum Mmechanics."

However, a well-known ontological problem of this 'Many Worlds' Interpretation is the bubbling up of billions of universes each split-second, caused by the fact that ALL quantum mechanical possibilities have to be realized and there is no wave function collapse. The number of universes in MWI is related to the frequency of quantum events also interpreted as the frequency of branched histories. At the same time, MWI says that interference phenomena provide evidence of multiple universes because particles interfere between 2 universes: (double-slit experiments reveal interference between neighboring universes, according to D. Deutsch) the "real" Universe in which I live and a "shadow" universe.

First, I suggest that these problems could be solved if we translate "shadow" and "real" universes of David Deutsch into "shadow" and "real" particles. The real particles are always accompanied by these shadow particles until they are measured in a specific way. (e.g., for interference in double-slit, or in Stern-Gerlach or Mach-Zehnder experiments) There is reason to suggest that these anti-mirror particles are present in-or-around each real particle. I suggest that in so-called "single photon interference events" (e.g., double-slit experiments), the photonic wave functions do not split in 2 equal halves.

Instead, these photons split into different anti-mirror wave functions representing also 2 different shadow and real particles. In the same way, quarks and leptons (neutrinos excluded) can

13

Page 14: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

split into 2 different (anti-mirror) shadow and real nonzero-sized particles which can be described by their own anti-mirror wave functions. If these shadow and real particles (or shadow and real photons) reunite appropriately, single-particle interference will occur. So-called "mirage" particles were last year found in elliptical quantum corrals by Dr. D. M. Eigler IBM (see Quantum Mirage Effect, http://www.almaden.ibm.com/almaden/media/image_mirage.html ).

Secondly, I suggest that multiple D. Deutsch universes could also be interpreted as identical synchronized anti-mirror universes spatially separated and non-local EPR correlated. Thus in this paper, "Many Worlds" is interpreted differently from "Deutsch’s MWI". The wave function collapse is still incorporated as an "objective phenomenon". There are EPR correlated observers outside the system which are positioned in the opposite dual universes. "Hidden variables" or real particle forms are responsible for the "chance" element in nature. And together with a local oscillation pattern of real nonzero-sized vacuum particles (dubbed "Higgs-Virgin particles"), they are responsible for the exact ticking rate of atom clocks. They are the origin of time and mass all according Relativity rules.

We

The very bizarre anti-Cartesian-but-causal result of this model is that YOU are not what you thought you were (i.e., a single individual). You have to deal with a real dual anti-mirror Self which -- in your perspective -- lives in opposite time in another universe. Consequently, 'WE' (and not 'I') found some support for this phenomenon in the well-known volitional act experiments made by Benjamin Libet. And we expect that future adapted "Libet experiments" should give possibilities to falsify or support this result.

If we accept that the increase of duration of so-called "retarded EPR correlation" is an evolutionary gift which gives humans more time than animals to have "reflection" for vetoing an urge or intention , then the "Tree of Good and Evil" in Paradise was a FALSE EXCUSE to throw Mankind out. It was an evolutionary necessity that humans made complex social conventions (moral) and created differences between Good and Evil.

Thus it seems even to be one of the evolutionary goals of the Universe to develop Love and Hatred, Peace and Aggression, and the evolutionary choice for humans to base social conventions (or moral ideas, leading to stable social systems) on these differences. Consequently, we seem to have more time for "reflection" than animals to compare our intentions and urges with our moral standards and to calculate our choices with our intelligence potential. But we may be called really FREE (freed from calculatory constraint) if we make altruistic choices.

Free Will

We were very surprised to find a quantum mechanical explanation for Free Will, which we could call: the control mechanism of the autonomous bubbling up of our intentions and urges. The great neuroscientist Benjamin Libet wrote: "It is widely accepted in science that the Universe is a closed deterministic system in which everything can ultimately be explained by pure physical causation. And yet, we all experience ourselves as having the freedom to choose between alternatives presented to us --We are in the driver’s seat. We are free to Choose or Veto alternatives."

The solution of this apparent paradox is that the Universe is not a single closed system but rather a multiple dual mirror-symmetric system, synchronized by EPR correlations which are supposed to be still

14

Page 15: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

in action since the Big Bang. It is like Alice (from Wonderland) in "through the looking glass" who sees her mirror image making exactly the same movements.

For human choices, this movement seems to be a little "quantum mechanically retarded" by what we call retarded EPR correlation or reflection. This could give animals and humans the opportunity to veto their intentions triggered by anti-selves living in dual universes. Then 'WE' (me and my anti-selves) are in the driver’s seat. But we only have access to the brakes! We are not free to execute our autonomous intuitions and urges. We may only compete by awareness to veto our intentions and urges (push the brakes) in a sort of transactional process with my anti-mirror Self which can be described as a sort of transactional free will! (see app. p: 45-46,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ). "Not doing" seems to be compatible with Libet’s Veto idea of free will.

If the World would be fully deterministic without a human veto possibility, we would be marionettes without the knowledge of the distinction between peace and aggression, love and hatred, altruism and egoism, and have no possibility to choose between them. We would not have what we would call "reflection" and -- as a consequence -- execute directly all our intentions. The World would be a senseless deterministic machine where existence seems to be a useless caprice.

"Free Will" could be described as the possibility to consider your direct autonomous intuitive intentions and urges in a balanced relation with your intelligence and moral ideas. Thus it seems that Stephen Hawking is wrong in his conclusion that the human race is "just a chemical scum" due to this new Quantum Mechanical rule of "retarded EPR correlation". At the same time, we are not "Turing machines" (suggested by D. Deutsch) because Turing Machines are supposed to have no transactional Veto possibility originated by RETARDED EPR correlation (which is supposed to be an exclusive property of animate matter). Thus, a human conscious choice cannot be simulated by any process at all. Consequently, the wWorld is not fully deterministic. It is more-or-less semi-deterministic and semi-transactional for animate matter.

Goals of Life

As a consequence, the first goal of Life in our dual universes could be described as: the creation of human love and hatred, peace and aggression, together with moral awareness by transactional free will based on human retarded EPR correlation to build a stable planetary connected community. This can be a social- or non-social community respectively, based on human cooperation or human repression by the few. The second goal of Life seems to be the creation, extension, and storage of a so-called "Cosmic Memory" which is somehow Earth-connected.

Consciousness

Consciousness is interpreted as the 3-fold combination of (1) Dual Universal EPR correlation (coined: Big Bang entanglement); (2) a complex random mechanical real particle collapse system; and (3) the Earth-connected "Cosmic Memory". Excessive creativity (which is recognized in Mozart’s and other composers' works) could be explained by this Cosmic Memory (or we may say direct perception of reality and truth).

Truth can still only be discovered intellectually through (rationalist) reasoning (R. Descartes). However, we become those new intuitive information as a dream (out of a sort of Cosmic Memory), unordered through our senses as the empiricists J. Locke and D. Hume assumed.

15

Page 16: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

Particles and Waves

To describe this more explicitly, beyond contemporary physics we postulate: a causal world of real sub-quantum level structured, non-energetic quarks and leptons floating in, energized, and even propelled by a vacuum sea of Zero-Point Energy (ZPE)-driven, oscillating real Higgs-virgin vacuum particles which are instantaneously Big Bang entangled with the Higgs-virgin vacuum particles of a Dual Universal Vacuum Frame. Higgs-virgin particles will change form by individual collision with real quarks and lepton particles into different kinds of real photon particles.

2 mutual colliding Higgs-virgin particles can transform into a real electron-positron pair. Electrons and positrons can merge with 1-or-2 photons to configure compound quarks and compound leptons (only Mu and Tau leptons). The electron, positron, neutrinos, and photons are "single particles". Neutrinos can only be produced by collision and decay effects between Higgs-virgin particles and compound quarks or compound leptons. They can be "form derived" from electrons, positrons, and photons if these particles were a part of compound quarks or compound leptons. All quarks, leptons, and bosons are dual universal EPR correlated.

Quarks and leptons (neutrinos excluded) don’t have force potentials -- in contrast with Higgs-virgin particles, Neutrinos and single Photons which are equipped with ONLY REPELLING force potentials. If photons and neutrinos are created, they automatically re-transform after a fixed short distance (ca. 1-cm) back into single Higgs-virgin particles (what we will call the Photon Transition; see .app .p.28, the explanation of the light-speed constancy,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Sheldrake.htm#appendix28 ).

After the photon transition, photons and neutrinos will leave their properties and energy behind in the form of an additional Higgs-virgin vacuum-oscillation (we will call this the Photonic Wave function) which expands with the speed -of-light relative to the local preferred reference frame. These additional Higgs-virgin oscillations will re-transform again into real photon or neutrino particles if a photon "measurement" in the form of a so-called collapse is made (photonic collapse). This is the explanation of photonic wave-particle duality.

A photon measurement is interpreted as the random (Dual Universal correlated) collapse of the photonic wave function changing a local Higgs-virgin vacuum particle into a real photon particle. The origin of the collapse is made by the random interaction of the real sub quantum level structured spinning quarks and leptons with the additional Higgs-virgin oscillation (the photonic wave function) of the vacuum particles. In contrast with modern physics, we suggest that the wave function of matter -- quarks and leptons (neutrinos excluded) -- is originated by the continuous real particle collisions with the Higgs-virgin vacuum particles. Therefore, these material wave functions should be interpreted as vibrations of spinning real particles, different from photonic wave functions, and propelled by the oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum particles.

Particle Geometry

The vacuum particles can change form by mutual collision into an electron-positron pair which stop to oscillate and start to spin by collisions with the energetic oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum particles themselves. These interactions can change the form of the vacuum particles into real photon particles (which are supposed to have a variety of 6 different forms). If the vacuum particle is represented as a torus-formed particle, it is supposed that this torus can deform according to mutual rotations of its 4

16

Page 17: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

equally formed quarter-torus parts. These parts can rotate relative to each other like a hinge in steps of 90 degrees to become other single elementary particles.

We can describe these single particles by coding the 4 possible positions of 90 degrees inside the particle. The axial relation between these torus parts can have 4 values (4x90=360 degrees) coded as 'O' (Ring), 'L' (Left), 'R' (Right), and 'U' (Up). The vacuum particle does not have internal deformation of the torus, so it is coded 'OOO'. The electron and positron are coded 'ORO', resp. 'OLO', which represents a sort of left or right spinning propeller. The 6 photons are coded 'ROL', 'UOU', 'ROU', 'LOU', 'ROR', and 'LOL'. The 6 neutrinos are coded 'RLR', 'LRL', 'LLL', 'RRR', 'ULU', 'URU'. As a result, this model predicts that Nature is able to deform the Higgs-virgin vacuum particle into 14 different single elementary particle forms.

Quarks and Mu- or Tau-leptons are supposed to be compound particles based on a combination of 1, 2, or 3 electrons or positrons combined with 1-or-2 photons out of a variety of 5 different photons (the graviton is excluded). Neutrinos are supposed to originate -- after deformation events inside compound particles -- out of a single photon, electron, or positron. Thus, a vacuum particle is not able to deform after collision directly into a neutrino.

'Z' particles are supposed to be a compound electron with a positron. 'W' particles are not supposed to be particles. Weak interactions are supposed to be a complex transition scheme of standard particle transitions. Thus in this model, there are 36 quarks (including 4 Mu+Tau leptons) +1 'Z' = 37 compound particles and 14 single particles = 51 particles with different forms, all derived from the vacuum particle.

In the Weak interaction scheme of neutron decay, it is supposed that a "d-quark" (coded: ORO+LOL+LOL) becomes a "u-quark" (coded OLO+ROR) by changing the 'LOL' particle of the d-quark in 2 steps:> LLL>into OLO which is the positron of the u-quark, and the second 'LOL' particle >into LRL which is the leaving anti-electro neutrino. The 'ORO' particle is leaving the scene unchanged as electron. The 'ROR' of the u-quark is a gluon picked from the "gluon sea" all around. It is supposed that there are only 5 different formed gluons. They are supposed to have the same particle form as 5 of the 6 photons. The graviton photon coded 'LOR' is not supposed to be able to act as a gluon.

Gravity and Mass

If the vacuum oscillations are the only universal energy source -- pushing around non-energetic quarks and Leptons, each with a specific propeller form -- then even Gravity is the net result of the repelling momentum transfer, originated by vacuum particle oscillations coming from all (globular) sides on quarks and leptons. It is postulated that gravitons do decrease the oscillatory momentum energy of the vacuum particles only from the direction of the graviton source. The different repelling energies of the vacuum particles and graviton influences introduce a combined net repelling force (or anisotropic radiation pressure) on quarks and leptons. Thus the repelling Higgs-virgin force from directions outside the Earth on quarks and leptons will over-compensate the opposing (but weaker) repelling mixed Higgs-virgin/graviton force (radiated from inside the Earth) to create the illusion of "gravitational attraction". This is an illusion because the vacuum oscillatory energy is weakened by the negative graviton energy. Thus, gravity is supposed to be a repelling force and not an attractive force.

Mass is the Lorentz covariant Capacity (Cg) of quarks and leptons to transform a specific number (N) of colliding vacuum particles into (the same number of) gravitons multiplied by the local time unit, Cg =N t. . E= Cg c2. Thus mass is based on discrete entities named "gravitons", which are supposed to be real particles and a collision product of oscillating vacuum particles and quarks and leptons. Gravitons

17

Page 18: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

are supposed to transform like all photons after 1-cm (see above) back into a real oscillating vacuum particle with decreased a-symmetric oscillation pressure (Particle-Wave duality).

Gravitational mass and Inertial mass are equivalent due to this phenomenon. However, the graviton radiation direction seems to be related to the scattering process induced by the object velocity in the oscillating spaceframe of the vacuum.

In cases of mass acceleration relative to the local vacuum reference frame (the local oscillating vacuum lattice), the local accelerated mass (and Cg) of an object increases Lorentz covariant with the gamma factor. Thus, the number of gravitons radiated by the object per local potential time unit of the vacuum lattice increases with the so-called "gamma factor" due to the polarization of the propeller formed quarks and leptons into the direction of propagation through the vacuum lattice. However, the number of radiated gravitons related to the retarding clock of the accelerated object itself increases even twice with the gamma factor per local time unit, because the local time of the accelerated object decreases with the gamma factor relative to the local potential space-time unit of the oscillating vacuum space frame lattice.

We assume in line with the preferred reference frame hypothesis of J.Bell -- and in contrast with Relativity -- that the absolute speed of a mass through the vacuum combined with the Lorentz covariant particle polarization is the origin of inertia and the increased mass. The mass increases by increased graviton production due to the polarization of these accelerated particles in the space frame and the increase of front coming vacuum particles. Based on normal scattering distributions, we propose that the trajectories of the scattered gravitons (which are produced by collision with vacuum particles) will be concentrated (or polarized) in the form of a cone with the central cone axis pointing parallel with the propagation direction of the massive particles and the top of the cone directed to the propagation front. Thus if we take a fast spinning wheel, it will radiate more gravitons into the direction of the plane of the wheel within a V-shaped section profile relative to other directions.

In general, gravitons are supposed to decrease the vacuum oscillatory pressure on particles from the direction of the graviton source, which is supposed to be the QM explanation for QM gravity (page 6, http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/leo_intro.htm#newtonian_quantum ). It was Evgeny Podkletnov who discovered a so-called "gravity shielding effect" created by the spinning disc described above (see: http://home.earthlink.net/~rcollins633/news/newsci_antigravity.htm ). However, we must emphasize that we don’t expect this effect to be the base for future anti-gravity devices because the effect is only supposed to polarize the direction of gravitons.

Multiple dual correlated dice and Schroedingers Cat

Einstein used to say "God plays no dice". In contrast with Einstein, we postulate that God does play with real dice: the elementary particles. The real particle form (or configuration), spin, and continuous collisions are the origin of choices that Nature makes. Which seems to be the origin of a clockwork causal Universe. However, all these dice are dual universal correlated by Big Bang entanglement. God plays dice on multiple dual-EPR correlated universal tables. The micro fluctuations and tiny differences in position on the Planck scale between these correlated particles is the causal origin of uncertainty!

Not only elementary particles but also spinning billiard balls are instantaneously anti-mirror correlated between Dual Universes. Only humans (and perhaps even animals) have a "retarded transactional collapse" correlation which is supposed to be the origin of Free Will. (Appendix, p.: 45-46, http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ). There are no

18

Page 19: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

superpositions of states which lead to paradoxes like Schroedinger’s cat. The wave function of photons or quarks and leptons may collapse in one universe by its own random interaction with the quantum vacuum (i.e., God's "playing table"). There is a superposition of states between dual universal-correlated or EPR laboratory-correlated waves or particles. However, the first collapsing particle instantaneous collapses the other particle by this instantaneous EPR correlation at a distance.

The Shnoll Effect(see also the so-called "Shnoll effect": http://21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/time.html and

http://www.biophotonen-online.de/abstract/abs2000-12.htm )

The recently discovered "Shnoll effect" is supposed to be an evidence for the preferred reference frame centered around the Sun with a rotational Galaxy relation. The articles (see above) describe that S.E. Shnoll measured anomalous statistical regularities in a wide range of physical, chemical, and biological processes from radioactive decay to the rates of biochemical reactions. The Shnoll Effect shows evidence for a relation between these anomalous regularities and major astronomical cycles including the Day, Month, and even the Year!

The articles conclude that 'Time' is heterogeneous and not a "Newtonian time"! "Each moment is different from another. This can be seen in any physical process that you study!" We don’t agree that this is the correct explanation. Our findings predict that the preferred reference frame around the Sun is the origin of the Shnoll Effect.

the Higgs mechanism and 6 Quantum Clocks

The so-called Higgs mechanism -- which was originally invented by modern Physics as a mathematical tool to compensate for the infinite energies measured on quarks and leptons -- should be interpreted as the basic and real Universal oscillating energy source which is Big Bang Entangled and nullified by our Dual anti-mirror Universe (together: negative and positive vacuum energies add up to Zero Energy!). Consequently, the extraction of Higgs-virgin vacuum energy is fundamental but instantaneously compensated (nullified) in our Dual anti-mirror Universe by BB Entanglement. At the same time (although it seems paradoxical), the Second Law of Thermodynamics extended for both universes is not violated.

If the QM vacuum is formed by oscillating vacuum particles oscillating along the edges of a chiral complex octahedron/tetrahedron lattice structure, and each vacuum particle is representing a dual universal EPR correlated clock due to instantaneous EPR correlated symmetry with its anti-universal oscillating vacuum particle, then we could count on each vacuum octahedron node 6 different dual universal EPR correlated clocks oscillating along the edges of this complex lattice.

If the light-speed isotropy on Earth is originated by non-isotropic sinusoidal oscillations of these particles (see: the LASOF) which compensate exactly for the speed of the Earth through the Solar framed complex vacuum lattice, then each vacuum lattice should oscillate in a different a-symmetric sinusoidal way, and with the same period of a complete oscillation. This could be counted as 6 different (Earth orbital direction dependant) oscillating clocks for each vacuum lattice, influencing the light-speed and all the other Relativity effects.

19

Page 20: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

the Bell-Bohm relation

Together with the foregoing ideas in this model, we learned that we could combine the parallel alternative quantum ideas described by David Bohm in 1993 in The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory (now called "Bohmian mechanics", written together with B. Hiley) and the Special Relativity interpretation of John Bell (who described his dissident ideas concerning Einstein’s Special Relativity in [1]). Bohmian mechanics assumes that the wave function is only an incomplete description of a system and governs the motion of more fundamental variables. We would add the assumption that there are 2 different wave functions -- the photonic wave function and the wave function of matter -- which both can spontaneously and randomly collapse by 2 trigger mechanisms:

(1) by the random interactions of fundamental variables such as the sub-quantum level structure and real spin of particles; or

(2) by Dual Universal Big Bang entanglement which is instantaneously synchronizing Dual anti-mirror Universes.

The trigger mechanism mediated by Big Bang entanglement means that the collapse of the wave function has mechanically taken place in one Universe, which is instantaneously mediated to the collapse mechanism in the other Big Bang entangled Dual anti-mirror universe(s). Therefore, these dual universes are fully synchronized down to the Planck scale. As a result, we can construct a real mental model of the Quantum World. This model leads to new features such as a causal explanation of Gravity and Mass, a Multi-Universal Big Bang in a Pulsating Universal System, a New Semi-Repelling Black Hole, etc.

20

Page 21: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

the Multi-Universal Big BangHow the "Big Bang" started after a "Big Crunch"

The figure below represents a so-called pulsating Universal system.

Time means Universal space-time or evolutionary time, which differs from the mass connected local time or local space-time.

Quantities means the quantities of all the single particles, which can be Higgs-virgin particles, photons, neutrinos, or the constituent parts of quarks and leptons. All particles compressed in black hole nuclei transform back completely into Higgs-virgin particles.

Explanation of the figure numbers -- see below:

(0) The End of the Semi-Cold-dual Fractal Big Bang "BB evaporation".(1) (Real and Anti-) Quark and Lepton quantities, time related.(2) Free oscillating Higgs-virgin particles in all dual universes.(3) Higgs-virgin particles compressed into black hole nuclei(4) Total finite quantity of particles together (1+2+3)is constant(5) Big Crunch of each universe into a single black hole.(6) Multiple black hole crunch into only one single Big Crunch.(7) Pre-Big Bang into multiple virgin black holes (see App. p. 15,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Bell.htm#appendix12 )(8) Fractal BB evaporation of a dual symmetric set of anti-copy universes, synchronized by Big Bang

Entanglement. (App. p.40, http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 )

The single virgin black hole at point 6 is called the "Big Crunch". This black hole continuously absorbs the oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum, resulting in a decrease of vacuum pressure at the black hole nuclear surface. Each Higgs-virgin particle in the black hole nucleus resists this vacuum pressure by a so-called bow tension. If the decreasing vacuum pressure at the black hole nuclear surface (6) becomes less than the increasing internal total bow tension of the internal Higgs-virgin particles, the nucleus will explode (see point 7).

21

Page 22: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

The semi-cold dual Fractal Big Bang originated by evaporation and creation of the expanding universal vacuum surface.

The Dual-Anti-Symmetric Multi-Universes are originated by a new type of Big Bang. This new Fractal Big Bang is in accordance with the so-called non-homogeneous Fractal distribution of galaxies in the Universe

(http://classes.yale.edu/math190a/Fractals/Panorama/Astronomy/Galaxies/Galaxies.html ). This Big Bang is supposed to be only hot at the Fractal Vertices, which are supposed to be relative smoothly exploding (evaporating) black hole nuclei. These vertices evaporate vacuum particles only at the expanding universal vacuum surface.

And these Fractal Vertices are the origin of a chiral oscillating quantum vacuum lattice left behind. The Fractal Vertices are supposed to be formed by an "Evaporating and Splitting process" of new non-General-Relativistic mass-less black hole nuclei. These nuclei are radial repelled at the surface of the evolving universal vacuum by the newly formed energetic oscillating quantum vacuum lattice itself.

Conventional General-Relativistic black holes are supposed to contain lots of energy concentrated in the nuclei called "singularities" based on the E=mc2 law and all the mass (m) -- which is supposed to be the content of those black holes nuclei -- has changed into energy (E). Our new non-General-Relativistic black hole has a nucleus which is filled with a fixed number of flexible, changeable, non-zero-sized vacuum particles which are compressed together by the surrounding oscillating vacuum. It is postulated that these vacuum particles may evaporate out of the black hole nucleus if the vacuum pressure has decreased due to the Big Crunch effect on the vacuum.

[StealthSkater note: I don't know if it is related here, but there is a non-singularity "Gravastar" model of a black hole archived at doc pdf URL . Also string and brane theories have offered a competitor model to the Inflationary part of the Big Bang which gives the same results but by an entirely different physics (and without the need to evolve from a point-like singularity of infinite density) => doc pdf URL ]

In the Big Bang process, these nuclear particles start to evaporate and oscillate in a newly formed complex chiral vacuum lattice due to the dual universal EPR correlating mechanism called "Big Bang entanglement". Dual anti-mirror universes are supposed to be fully synchronized. As a result, at each moment that a specific vacuum particle in one universe oscillates in the up direction of a specific vacuum lattice, its anti-mirror particle is oscillating in the spatial separated anti-mirror universe in the down direction of the anti-mirror vacuum lattice at the same moment.

However, the original Big Bang (Black Hole) nucleus will split into several pieces which are pushed outside the vacuum by the growing vacuum balloon to create Fractal-like trajectories through the Universe in the form of the (by astronomers so-called) "Lyman-Alpha Forest" (which represent the fractal-like distribution of Galaxies in the Universe). These evaporating and splitting black holes in the form of fractal vertices are also supposed to create matter and annihilation radiation of electrons and positrons. And consequently ,they are also the origin of the well known "Cosmic Background Radiation-Anisotropies".

In the Big Bang process, a part of the spliced black hole nuclei (or splinters) stop to evaporate because they become "locked up" in the evolving energetic oscillating quantum vacuum lattice. As a consequence, these splinters evolve into so-called "pairing Galaxy seeds" -- the origin of galaxies and dark matter.

22

Page 23: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

We will call these pairing black holes "Anchor Black Holes" because they are supposed to be the "anchors" for newly-formed super-massive stars formed in between (which is the center of a so-called "Lenticular Galaxy"). After the explosion of these super-massive stars into "hypernovas", the hypernova will explode and transform into a new black hole which is supposed to be able to migrate (propelled by the a-symmetrically oscillating vacuum itself) and automatically head for the most near black hole outside the center of the dual anchor black holes.

This duo will become the start of a new but smaller dual anchor black hole system to form a new star producing center in between for more complexity of the Galaxy. The "Gamma Ray Bursts" (which were recently detected by the "Burst Alert Telescope" (BAT) at distances of 9-12 billion light-years away from us) must be interpreted as originated by these hypernova explosions. I postulate that black holes are only stable if they are all around enclosed (i.e., "locked up") in an energetic oscillating vacuum, because the quantum mechanical momentum of the vacuum on the nucleus is supposed to balance the internal "bow tension" of the nuclear particles of the black hole.

At the surface of the universal vacuum, black holes are supposed to be only asymmetrical surrounded by this repelling vacuum and consequently they accelerate in radial universal direction. Due to this asymmetrical repelling vacuum, black holes are able to evaporate the finite particle content of their black hole nucleus (see App. p. 40-41,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ).

The resulting Big Bang model is closed because it is based on a finite number of non zero-sized complex (stringy) vacuum particles, which are able to change form into matter- or photon particles. The finite number of particles is supposed to be already present in the nucleus of the original Big Bang nucleus itself.

The universal vacuum without black holes or mass concentrations would have no net space-time curvation caused by the isotropic oscillating vacuum lattice.

However, black holes and mass concentrations create space-time distortions. Black holes, for instance, are supposed to absorb ("eat") the surrounding "Higgs-virgin" particles of the quantum vacuum lattice (origin of the Hubble redshift). Mass is supposed to influence the oscillating energy of the vacuum particles and makes the vacuum also non-isotropic. This vacuum particle-and-energy changing by respectively black holes and mass is supposed to be the origin of the distortion and "stretching" of light-waves, which mimics the "Hubble" expansion of the Universe.

Thus, the universal vacuum is eaten from the "inside" by black holes. The vacuum is expanding at the outside by spliced evaporating black holes as long as these black holes have not fully evaporated their finite nuclear content of Higgs-virgin vacuum particles. As a consequence, if the spliced black holes (Fractal Vertices) have evaporated all of their finite nuclear particle content, the universal contraction from the inside is no more compensated by the expansion at the universal surface.

I must conclude that the generally-accepted Hubble recession of galaxies is an illusion because it is mimicked by the gravitational redshift due to universal vacuum absorption originated by lots of "massive" (paradoxical massless) "old" black holes and less massive "new" black holes located -- surprisingly -- mainly at the outside of galaxies (which we may call: dark matter). Black holes are supposed to create matter at the rim of the "light horizon" (mainly in the form of Hydrogen gas). This is also the reason why black holes are supposed to be unable to merge with each other. The created gas will always tend to concentrate into the middle between 2 black holes. Consequently, black holes will

23

Page 24: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

merge only in the Big Crunch process if the local vacuum has become under a certain vacuum particle density level.

This Big Bang model is postulated to create dual-symmetric spatial separated universes without so-called "cosmic symmetry breaking". An even number of spatial-separated universes is postulated to be still (anti-mirror) symmetric and synchronized by Dual Universal EPR Correlation (called "Big Bang entanglement"). Just as we measure in the laboratory where we are not able to destroy these EPR particle symmetries. This Big Bang model is not supposed to be the so-called "Ultimate Free Lunch". It doesn’t violate the 2nd Law of thermodynamics because the energy of 2 EPR correlated vacuum particles oscillating with opposite frequencies in both dual (anti-mirror) symmetric universes add-up to Zero Energy. Thus all mass and energy in our Universe is compensated by -- and in balance with -- our opposite anti-mirror universe.

Conclusion: DUAL UNIVERSAL EPR CORRELATION ("Big Bang entanglement") is still guiding and synchronizing all particles. Thus everything there is between separated anti-mirror universes -- even energetic vacuum particles and local time -- are synchronized. Big Bang Entanglement and the energetic quantum vacuum lattice are the origin of Physical Law.

All non-zero sized elementary particles attracted from outside and concentrated in black hole nuclei are supposed to change form into vacuum particles, due to the compression force originated by the oscillating quantum vacuum. Evaporation of black holes is only possible at the surface of the universal vacuum, or in special cases of micro black holes.

Big Bang Entanglement

If we take the External Observers of Quantum Mechanics literally …

… then there is no need for a broken Big Bang symmetry.

The causal Big Bang creation has led to matter and anti matter in perfect Big Bang entangled balance, divided in at least 2 spatially separated anti-mirror Universes which still interact together in a perfectly unbroken symmetry, constantly "observing" each other by Big Bang entanglement.

According to modern physics, the EPR correlation mechanism predicts that each elementary particle that came out of the Big Bang had a counterpart (anti-mirror) particle which was non-local EPR correlated. These correlations should now be washed out due to a still unknown mysterious annihilation and decoherence mechanism, resulting in the so-called broken symmetry of our material Universe which does not contain appreciable amounts of anti-matter. However, this model predict that the anti-mirror particle symmetry is still there in the form of dual universal symmetry based on chiral (left- or right-handed) particles and chiral oscillating vacuum lattices.

24

Page 25: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

As a consequence, we postulate:

1. That these EPR correlated (anti-mirror) particles still exist. And that they are separated into at least 2 SPATIALLY SEPARATED ANTI-MIRROR UNIVERSES by a special kind of a 2-STAGE BIG BANG FRACTAL EVAPORATION (App. p.40-41,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ). Each Universe has its own grand universal wave function that embraces only one universe and is correlated by DUAL UNIVERSAL PROCESSES.

2. That the EPR correlated particles are equipped with individual wave functions which can collapse by a DUAL UNIVERSAL COLLAPSE PROCESS.

3. That the Dual Universal Collapse- or choice process is EPR-synchronized (non-local action at a distance) within a specific time-window which has a different duration for elementary particles, for DNA molecules, and for our Human choices. This EPR synchronization process we may call: DUAL UNIVERSAL SYNCHRONIZATION PROCESS.

4. That the Dual Universal Synchronization process is mediated to hardrock particles (which are the base of our visible world) by phantom particles, which are not always connected to hardrock particles (discovered by Dr. Eigler (IBM) and others; see: App., p.44 ,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ). Phantom particles act as a DUAL UNIVERSAL COSMIC MEMORY and explain Inertia, Interference, and Evolutionary memory.

The combination of the Dual-Universal collapse process, the Dual Universal EPR synchronization process (Big Bang Entanglement) together with Dual Universal cosmic memory that we will call CONSCIOUSNESS.

5. That Probability is created by the individual sub-quantum level 3-Dimensional forms of real hardrock elementary particles. Quarks are compound particles, composed out of 2,3,4, or 5 3-Dimensional transformed Higgs-virgin particles. Mu- and Tau-leptons are supposed to be compound "free" quarks. A Z-particle is a compound electron with a positron. All other particles are single transformed Higgs-virgin particles. "God plays dice with real dice" which create chance by their complicated form, random real spin, and real collisions with Higgs-virgin particles and photons.

6. That oscillating Higgs-virgin particles fill up the vacuum in a complex chiral way. The trajectories of these oscillating Higgs-virgin particles are supposed to fill up and form 3-D space by a complex space frame lattice. To make this lattice chiral, we need to take structural lattices away which create holes in the lattice. We found only ONE WAY TO DO THIS SYSTEMATICALLY for left- and right-rotating lattices. The so-called "holes" are supposed to create the exchange of real non-zero sized photons over distances of ca. 1-cm. Therefore, real non-zero sized photons are supposed to "jump" only over distances of ca. 1-cm. (particle-wave duality). Opposite dual anti-mirror universes have opposite chirality (left and right).

This should be the cause of the creation of matter in our Universe and anti-matter in our dual universe and the chirality effects measured in so-called CP-Violations. The chirality in Nature (plants, shells etc.) is supposed to have the same cause. Oscillating "Lattice space" deals far more better with the Quantum Mechanical properties than so-called "fiber space", which is based on the idea of smooth trajectories of photons and Higgs-virgin vacuum particles through space, and which

25

Page 26: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

was our starting idea. However, fiber space is much better able to be used as a visual aid to describe these ideas about space (page 6-9, http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Vuyk.htm#appendix5 ).

7. By Zero-Point Energy, the oscillating Higgs-virgin particles pushes leptons and quarks around. And by these collisions, Higgs-virgin particles change form into different sorts of bosons which only travel over a distance of ca. 1-cm.

That the POSITIVE Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) of OUR Universal vacuum is in full ZERO balance with the NEGATIVE ZPE energy of the DUAL anti-mirror Universe because it has (in our mathematical perspective) a negative running time.

We suggest that the 2-stage Big Bang Fractal Evaporation has led to overlapping common cosmic areas of universes, which can be discriminated as hotter large-scale CMB anisotropies of the cosmic background radiation. Photographic evidence is given by cosmic background radiation photos which represent 3-to-4 distinctive elliptic areas (large-scale areas with multiple patches in red) mapped by Plinger CMB anisotropies ( see: http://arcturus.mit.edu/gallery/gifs/cmbt3d.gif ).

the Observer Problem

Standard Quantum Mechanics (von Neumann-Dirac theory) has one BIG problem. It requires observers which have to be treated as being external to the system! This led to theories of superposition of states (e.g., mixed dead and alive Schroedinger's cats), and it was for Hugh Everett reasons to invent his relative-state formulation (Many splitting Worlds, many minds, etc. ).

Everett dropped the collapse dynamics to solve the measurements problem of the von Neumann-Dirac model, which needed observers placed outside the system. Consequently, IN THE STANDARD MODEL, THE UNIVERSE COULD NOT BE DESCRIBED AS A UNITY OR A WHOLE!!!! Everett concluded that the standard theory can not be used to describe systems that contain observers:

IT CAN ONLY DESCRIBE SYSTEMS WHERE ALL THE OBSERVERS ARE EXTERNAL TO THE DESCRIBED SYSTEM! Consequently, he choose to invent a splitting world where each quantum choice is realized in a new MAGIC SPLITTING Universe without a collapse system. Strangely enough, this is accepted as the only valid interpretation of Quantum Mechanics by well-known scientists like Stephen Hawking, Bryce DeWitt, David Deutsch, etc.

As an alternative, this model postulates an even number of DUAL ANTI-MIRROR UNIVERSES which contain COLLAPSING PROCESSES and which OBSERVE EACH OTHER AS OBSERVABLES -- all managed by BIG BANG ENTANGLEMENT.

As a result, there is no need for mixed dead or alive cats (Schroedinger) or splitting worlds (Everett) because Big Bang entanglement between both universes may count for the required external observing and measuring process. Every elementary particle has its own correlated anti-particle as an alternating observer or "observable to observe" living in that dual distant universe.

Therefore we may say THE EPR ENTANGLEMENT EXPERIMENTS ON LABORATORY SCALE -- INSPIRED BY THE BELL THEOREM -- ARE THE MINIATURE BASE FOR ALL COLLAPSES OF WAVE FUNCTIONS (or reductions of state vectors) in both anti-mirror universe(s). The Dual-Universal collapse mechanism and Dual Universal EPR correlation (or synchronization), we will call Big Bang entanglement (BBE) together with Dual Universal cosmic memory which we will call Cosmic Consciousness.

26

Page 27: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

For animate matter, it is challenging to rename these phenomena in philosophical terms. "Dual Universal Collapse" becomes the "I, EGO, SELF". 'Dual Universal EPR synchronization' becomes the "MIND". "Dual Universal memory" becomes the "SOUL". "Cosmic Consciousness" becomes BRAHMAN or "GOD". As an interesting parallel, in Hindu-Vedic philosophy Brahman is composed out of 3 entities (Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu), which seems to show similarities with respectively the Ego, the Mind, and the Soul.

According to Daniel C. Dennett, evolution by natural selection can explain natural history without the need for Divine design. But our model indicates that the vacuum lattice plus sub-quantum level forms of particles NEED Divine design. At the same time, the weird consequence of reciprocally observing dual Universes is that each person is Big Bang entangled with his/hers anti-persons, living in opposing anti-mirror Universes.

So the idea of a private self ("I think, therefore I am"/Rene Descartes) has to be transformed into: a plural self: "WE have a shared free will synchronized and mediated by Big Bang entanglement. Therefore, WE are!" (see Benjamin Libet (free will), D.M. Eigler (phantom particles), V. Poponin/P.Gariaev (phantom DNA), Frank Tipler (cosmic memory accumulation), Rupert Sheldrake (morphic resonance) app.p.43 , http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ).

Reconciliation

To reconcile Quantum Mechanics with Relativity, we have to reconcile the theory of the quanta (the standard Quantum Theory) with the theory of the fields (Albert Einstein). And consequently, we should get something like a so-called Quantum-Field Theory.

This Internet paper is not an alternative Quantum Field Theory. It is a new quantum model with a new interpretation of Special Relativity which arose by combining the dissident ideas of several well-known physicists. On the quantum-scale, this paper uses Peter Higgs’s theory which is build on the idea that the vacuum is a structured medium filled up to the rim with Higgs particles and what we call "mass" is the result of interactions with these Higgs particles. If we stretch his accepted ideas a little further, we can make 3 additional postulates:

1. Higgs particles are REAL oscillating hardrock particles with a specific 3-dimensional form and the ability to transform by collision, after which they become a detectable particle. Consequently, Higgs particles are the virginal progenitors of elementary particles and therefore we will name them 'Higgs-virgin particles'.

2. A black hole nucleus (or singularity) has a finite volume and is densely packed with these Higgs-virgin particles which are compressed together by the oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum itself. At the same time, black hole nuclei constantly grow in volume by absorbing Higgs-virgin particles (with an exception for micro black holes like "ball lightning").

3. Mass is the Lorentz covariant Capacity (Cg) of quarks and leptons to transform a specific number of colliding Higgs-virgin particles into (the same number of) gravitons per local time unit.

In cases of mass acceleration relative to the local reference frame (the local oscillating vacuum lattice), the local accelerated mass (and Cg) increases Lorentz covariant.

27

Page 28: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

E=Cgc2. This should be the reason why Inertial and Gravitational mass is locally precisely equal.

At the same time: LOCAL TIME is related to a specific number of radiated gravitons per mass unit. Conclusion: Everything comes in quanta. Even LOCAL TIME is mass-connected. There is no local time if there is no mass. If there is no mass, there is only the potential time speed of the local oscillating vacuum reference frame.

Local time is accepted to be related to the internal resonance of atoms. Local space-time represents the local (Higgs-virgin) time potential for mass-carrying particles which are floating in a local reference frame of oscillating Higgs-virgin particles. Each elementary particle suffers a bombardment of these oscillations from all sides. If we represent the strength of the oscillatory impacts on the particle by vectors, we may represent this as a so-called Higgs-virgin vector globule (which is not a perfect globule) caused by absolute speed of a mass relative to the vacuum or by a-symmetric oscillations (LASOF) of the vacuum (see page 6 , http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Vuyk.htm#appendix5).

If the fine structure of this Higgs-virgin vector globule transforms by oscillation changes of Higgs-virgin vacuum particles due to the neighborhood of a mass (by additional gravitational wave functions), Local time and mass will change according to General Relativity rules. However, the running of a clock in a spaceship is dependant of its absolute speed relative to the local oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum which can be interpreted as a local reference frame. Except from the LASOF, this local reference frame was described by John Bell in his book [1].

Consequently, space-time can be different in different places of the Universe due to differences in the density and energy of the oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum, such as in the neighborhood of mass concentrations and vacuum consuming black holes. In contrast with "local" spacetime, "Universal" space-time or evolutionary time is driven by the peculiar pulsation frequency of the imploding and inflating vacuum of the pulsating universal mechanism as a whole (see App. p. 14 ,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Bell.htm#appendix12 )

To underline again the difference with (Peter) Higgs particles, we added the word 'virgin' and call them Higgs-virgin particles. They oscillate and fill the vacuum up to the rim. And they are the origin of the 2-stage fractal BB evaporation of the Universe by means of a repelling gravity effect (App. p.40-42, http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ). This Higgs-virgin particle gives in combination with a graviton a 2-fold or dual pushing gravity effect on leptons and quarks, which means that we suggest that gravity is not a "sucking" but a dual "pushing" power (e.g., the Higgs-virgin impulse pressure (on mass-carrying particles) from the vacuum outside the Earth exceeds the combined Higgs-virgin/graviton impulse pressure coming out of the Earth (i.e., the resulting force we call 'gravity' -- (see page 6 , http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Vuyk.htm#appendix5 ). [StealthSkater note: don't know if this can be tied in to what Bob Lazar and Richard Cramer suggested regarding gravity and UFOs => doc pdf URL ]

28

Page 29: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

the new semi-repelling Quantum Black Hole

Nothing: (not photons, nor even Higgs-virgin particles) can escape from the center of a black hole as it is floating in the symmetric oscillating Higgs-virgin vacuum. Consequently, NO GRAVITONS CAN BE PRODUCED. Therefore, black holes don’t have mass and even no energy at all (E=mc2)! The sucking energy of the black hole including radiation effects around the light horizon comes from the energetic Higgs-virgin vacuum itself. This energy -- also-called Zero-Point Energy -- originates in this case a special single PUSHING gravity force on the Black Hole WITHOUT THE HELP OF GRAVITONS.

Mainstream physics breaks down around such a peculiar Black Hole. But we searched and found many evidences for this theory in the Cosmos. To say it more simply, the overwhelming complexity of the Cosmos we discover today should be originated under the curious space-deforming influence of this complex new mass-less black hole

(p.9 , http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/leo_intro.htm#higgs_repulsion ;p. 21, http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/PS_Canterbury.htm#page21 ; andp. 26, http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/PS_Sketches.htm#page26 .)

These new black holes are supposed to litter the Galaxy. But they also have a magnificent job in complexifying all kinds of cosmological structures and even produce matter. We will not find this new black hole as the great attractor in the center of our Galaxy but rather in large amounts spread through the Universe.

There are supposed to be 4 main black hole types based on the magnitude of particle content:

(1) Big Bang Galaxy seeds: left over from the Big Bang, called "primary black holes" or "Galaxy seeds" (App., p.40-41,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40 ), ranging from huge Anchor Black Holes of Galaxy clusters (see App., p.18-19 , http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Arp.htm#appendix18 ) down to Anchor Black Holes of single galaxies (p.26 ,

http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/PS_Sketches.htm#page26).

(2) Star Anchor Black Holes or secondary black holes on either polar side of stars like our own Sun (App. p. 36-40, http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix34 ). These black holes are supposed to originate in super/hyper-nova explosions.

(3) Sunspot Black Holes; smaller micro black holes in an X- or double-coned configuration inside stars and failed stars, represented in our Sun and Jupiter (ref: see the vortex and red spots in the 2 cloud bands of Jupiter). These black holes are supposed to be originated by magnetic storms in the same way as "ball lightning" originates on Earth (p.21-25 , http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/PS_Canterbury.htm#page21 ).

(4) Ball Lightning.

In general, small young black holes should be nested counter-intuitive just in the center of galaxies (evidence see: Astron. Journ.119: 207-240, Jan. 2000, p:231, presenting 42 small diameter sources with counterparts). Thus, single young black holes tend to combine in groups without merging with each other, they produce matter and radiate gamma rays. This matter creation process is responsible for

29

Page 30: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

annihilation radiation in the 511 KeV rang. (see: http://antwrp.gsfc.gov/apod/ap970501.html ). Recently, we found clear gamma-ray pictures of symmetrical structured groups of combinations with 2,3,4 X-ray sources in our Milky Way Galaxy (http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap000324.html ). Droplet-like condensations in nearby planetary nebula such as the Helix nebula (see http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap960416.html ) are thought to represent ejected Sunspot Black Holes.

There is a firm reason why in these regions (galaxy center) even matter will be formed, due to the pair production of electrons and positrons around the light horizon of black holes combined with the chirality of the vacuum itself, as is also explained for Galaxy seeds in the Fractal BB evaporation (App. p.40-41, http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/App_Haisch.htm#appendix40). The process of matter formation in the center of our Galaxy will have a pulsating effect because this matter is not swirling into the nearby black holes. In contrast, it will push (counter-intuitively) the black holes away from each other and away from the center of the Galaxy. This is supposed to produce a violent explosion which can be compared with the Helix nebula, leaving an empty hole in the middle. This hole will fill up again with smaller new black holes, produced in the Galaxy by supernovas.

Galaxy center explosions are predicted to recur each 10,000 years by Dr. P. LaViolette. In his book Earth Under Fire and Beyond the Big Bang, he described this phenomenon (although his arguments are not based on the existence of black holes as we do). See

http://www.etheric.com/LaViolette/predict.html .

These astronomical data -- and the explanation for consciousness and Big Bang entanglement as a base for Inertia, Interference, and Free Will -- arose at the end of the road of this paper. It was a big surprise! All particles in our Universe are instantaneous EPR correlated and observing their mirror anti-particles in the anti-mirror Universe by what we call Big Bang entanglement, which is not washed out even after billions of years of Universal evolution!

CONTENTS: see http://home.planet.nl/~vuyk0022/leo_intro.htm#postscripts .

[NB note: This Internet article was scanned in by Nic Vroom. We copied only the most important parts of the manuscript to fit capacity limits and picture qualities. Many thanks we would like to make to the following persons (in order of the alphabet): Halton Arp, Femmie Blommendaal, Raoul Boot, Margriet Bordes, Arnold Brandon, Emile Burnaby-Lautier, Evert Frikkee, Jim Juffermans, Herman Mertens, Cornelie van Omme,Wouter Pijzel, Rupert Sheldrake, Bob Soeterik, Paulus van Vliet, Bob Voorhoeve, Nicolaas Vroom, Daan van Zanten, Leontien, and Rutger and all the coincident chances composed by mother nature itself.]

All the sciences and philosophies climb the same mountain from different directions.Will they once meet at the same top?

Leo Vuyk. 2-29-2000.

30

Page 31: Vuyk_1.doc  · Web viewAlbert Einstein couldn’t accept Niels Bohr’s Uncertainty of Quantum Mechanics (QM) because it took causality away from Nature. He argued that Quantum Mechanics

References

[1] John S. Bell, Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, (1987), Ch.9: called "How to teach Special Relativity"

[2] Phys. Rev. Letters, Vol. 1, No. 9, 1958, p.342-343.

[3] Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1964,Vol. 54, No. 2, p.147-151.

[4] (P. 475) of: IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. IM 25, No.4, Dec. 1976. Page 473-477, "High-Precision Time Comparison via Satellite etc."

if on the Internet, press <BACK> on your browser to return to the previous page (or go to www.stealthskater.com)

else if accessing these files from the CD in a MS-Word session, simply <CLOSE> this file's window-session; the previous window-session should still remain 'active'

31