vringo v google - d delay royalties schedule (2012-12-21).pdf

7/29/2019 Vringo v Google - D Delay Royalties Schedule (2012-12-21).pdf

1/9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

NORFOLK DIVISION

I/P ENGINE, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

AOL INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512

JOINT MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TOEXPEDITE BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO POSTPONE

BRIEFING AND RULING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR POST-JUDGMENT

ROYALTIES

The Defendants Google Inc., Target Corporation, IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett

Co., Inc. and AOL Inc. (collectively Defendants), and the Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.

(Plaintiff) respectfully move this Court to expedite the briefing on the Defendants Motion to

Postpone Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties, and in support

thereof, state as follows:

1. Trial in this matter proceeded for four weeks before a jury with judgment in favor of thePlaintiff being entered on November 21, 2012 (Dkt. 801).

2. On December 18, 2012, the parties filed the following post-judgment motions (collectively,Post-Judgment Motions):

A. By Defendants:

Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 849 Filed 12/21/12 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 22014


2/9

Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Invalidity or New Trial(Dkt. 820);

Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Non-Infringement orNew Trial (Dkt. 831); and

Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Damages or a NewTrial (Dkt. 833);

B. By Plaintiff:

Motion for New Trial on the Dollar Amount of Past Damages by I/P Engine,Inc. (Dkt. 825);

Motion for Judgment under Rule 52(B) and a New Trial under Rule 59 by I/PEngine, Inc. (Dkt. 835);

Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties by I/P Engine, Inc. (Dkt.822) (Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties).

The parties have agreed to move for an extension of time to respond to the Post-Judgment

Motions, such that Oppositions would be due on January 25, 2013, and Reply Briefs would be

due on February 15, 2013.

3. On December 21, 2012, the Defendants filed their Motion to Postpone Briefing and Rulingon Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties. Unless expedited, a response to that

motion will not be due until January 4, 2013 under Local Rule 7, and a reply will not be due

until January 10, 2013, which would leave Defendants with little time to prepare their

Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties if necessary. To ensure

sufficient time for a response while avoiding unnecessary expenditure of resources,

Defendants and Plaintiff have jointly requested that the response to the Motion to Postpone

Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties be expedited.

4. Plaintiff and Defendants jointly request that the Court enter an order requiring expediting thebriefing schedule for the Motion To Postpone Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion for



3/9

Post-Judgment Royalties. The parties request that the Proposed Order attached as Exhibit 1

be entered expediting the briefing as follows:

Plaintiff to respond to the Motion To Postpone Briefing and Ruling on PlaintiffsMotion for Post-Judgment Royalties by December 31, 2012; and

Defendants Reply Brief be filed on or before January 3, 2013.WHEREFORE, the parties request that this Court expedite the briefing of Defendants

Motion To Postpone Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties,

with Plaintiffs Opposition due on December 31, 2012 and Defendants Reply Brief due on

January 3, 2013.

DATED: December 21, 2012 /s/ Stephen E. NoonaStephen E. Noona

Virginia State Bar No. 25367KAUFMAN &CANOLES, P.C.

150 West Main Street, Suite 2100

Norfolk, VA 23510Telephone: (757) 624-3000

Facsimile: (757) 624-3169

[email protected]

David Bilsker

David A. Perlson

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, California 94111Telephone: (415) 875-6600

Facsimile: (415) 875-6700

[email protected]@quinnemanuel.com

Counsel for Google Inc., Target Corporation,

IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Gannett Co., Inc.

/s/ Stephen E. Noona

Stephen E. Noona



4/9


150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100

Norfolk, VA 23510Telephone: (757) 624-3000

Facsimile: (757) 624-3169

Robert L. Burns

FINNEGAN,HENDERSON,FARABOW, GARRETT &DUNNER, LLP

Two Freedom Square11955 Freedom Drive

Reston, VA 20190

Telephone: (571) 203-2700Facsimile: (202) 408-4400

Cortney S. AlexanderFINNEGAN,HENDERSON,FARABOW,GARRETT &DUNNER, LLP3500 SunTrust Plaza303 Peachtree Street, NEAtlanta, GA 94111Telephone: (404) 653-6400Facsimile: (415) 653-6444

Counsel for DefendantAOL Inc.

_/s/ Donald C. Schultz___________Donald C. Schultz

W. Ryan SnowSteven StancliffCRENSHAW,WARE &MARTIN,P.L.C.150 West Main Street, Suite 1500Norfolk, VA 23510Telephone: (757) 623-3000Facsimile: (757) [email protected]@[email protected]

Jeffrey K. SherwoodKenneth W. BrothersDICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 Eye Street NWWashington, DC 20006Telephone: (202) 420-2200Facsimile: (202) [email protected]@dicksteinshapiro.com



5/9

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 21, 2012, I will electronically file the foregoing with

the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing (NEF)

to the following:

Jeffrey K. SherwoodKenneth W. BrothersDICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 Eye Street NW

Washington, DC 20006Telephone: (202) 420-2200Facsimile: (202) [email protected]@dicksteinshapiro.com

Donald C. SchultzW. Ryan SnowSteven StancliffCRENSHAW,WARE &MARTIN,P.L.C.150 West Main Street, Suite 1500Norfolk, VA 23510

Telephone: (757) 623-3000Facsimile: (757) [email protected]@[email protected]

Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc.

/s/ Stephen E. Noona

Stephen E. Noona


150 West Main Street, Suite 2100

Norfolk, VA 23510


[email protected]



6/9



7/9

Exhibit 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

NORFOLK DIVISION

I/P ENGINE, INC.

Plaintiff,

v.

AOL INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512

PROPOSED ORDER

On this day came the parties, by counsel, upon the parties Joint Motion To Expedite

Briefing OnDefendants Motion to Postpone Briefing and Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion for Post-

Judgment Royalties and, upon consideration of the parties arguments, and for good cause shown

it is ORDERED that:

Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants Motion to Postpone Briefing and Ruling onPlaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties on or before December 31, 2012; and

Defendants Reply Brief in Support of Defendants Motion to Postpone Briefing andRuling on Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties shall be filed on or beforeJanuary 3, 2013.

Dated: December ___, 2012 _________________________________

United States District CourtEastern District of Virginia

Case 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-TEM Document 849-1 Filed 12/21/12 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 22020


8/9

WE ASK FOR THIS:

/s/Stephen E. Noona

Stephen E. Noona(Virginia Bar No. 25367)

KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100Norfolk, VA 23510

Telephone: (757) 624.3000

Facsimile: (757) 624.3169

David Perlson

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN LLP

50 California Street, 22nd Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111


Counsel for Defendants Google Inc.,

IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc.

and Target Corporation

/s/Stephen E. Noona

Stephen E. Noona

(Virginia Bar No. 25367)

KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100

Norfolk, VA 23510

Telephone: (757) 624-3000

Facsimile: (757) 624-3169

Cortney S. AlexanderFINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

3500 SunTrust Plaza303 Peachtree Street, NE

Atlanta, GA 94111Telephone: (404) 653-6400

Facsimile: (415) 653-6444

Counsel for Defendant AOL Inc.



9/9

_/s/ Donald C. Schultz___________Donald C. SchultzW. Ryan SnowSteven StancliffCRENSHAW,WARE &MARTIN,P.L.C.150 West Main Street, Suite 1500

Norfolk, VA 23510Telephone: (757) 623-3000Facsimile: (757) [email protected]@[email protected]

Jeffrey K. SherwoodKenneth W. BrothersDICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 Eye Street NW

Washington, DC 20006Telephone: (202) 420-2200Facsimile: (202) [email protected]@dicksteinshapiro.com

Counsel for Plaintiff


vringo v google - d delay royalties schedule (2012-12-21).pdf

Documents