vorapaxar for secondary prevention in patients with prior myocardial infarction

16
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering Committee and Investigators NCT00526474; Trial funded by Merck Clinical Trial Update European Society of Cardiology Munich, August 26, 2012

Upload: marie

Post on 24-Feb-2016

57 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction . NCT00526474; Trial funded by Merck. Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering Committee and Investigators. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPHOn behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering Committee and Investigators

NCT00526474; Trial funded by Merck

Clinical Trial UpdateEuropean Society of Cardiology

Munich, August 26, 2012

Page 2: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Background

• The benefit of adding other antiplatelet drugs to aspirin for long-term 2° prevention in stable patients with prior MI is uncertain

• Vorapaxar inhibits platelet activation by antagonizing thrombin-mediated activation of the protease activated receptor (PAR)-1

Page 3: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Prior MI, CVA, or PADN=26,449

Vorapaxar2.5 mg/d

Placebo

RANDOMIZE 1:1 DOUBLE BLIND

Follow up VisitsDay 30, Mo 4, Mo 8, Mo 12

Q6 months

Standard care including oral antiplt rx

Final Visit

Primary Efficacy Analysis:1. CVD/MI/Stroke2. CVD/MI/Stroke/Urgent

Coronary RevascPrincipal Safety EP:• GUSTO Mod/Sev bleeding

Median F/U 30 Months

Prior MI Inclusion:Type 1 MI >2 wks and <12

months before randomization

Trial Design

Stratified by:1) Qualifying Disease State2) Use of thienopyridine

Morrow et al. N Engl J Med 2012ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00526474

Page 4: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Background – 1° Efficacy EvaluationOverall Population

CV Death, MI, or Stroke

9.3%

10.5%

Hazard Ratio 0.87p < 0.001

N = 26449Mean f/u: 2.5 years Placebo

Vorapaxar

GUSTO Mod/Sev at 3 yrs 4.2 v. 2.5%, HR 1.66, p<0.001

Morrow et al. N Engl J Med 2012ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00526474c

Page 5: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Statistical MethodsPrior MI Cohort

Prior MI Cohort• Prospectively defined subgroup of 1° interest• 17,779 patients (67% of total trial population)Low-bleeding Risk Cohort• Based on prior studies1, we applied previously

established criteria to identify patients with a low risk of bleeding who have potential for improved net clinical outcomes with potent antiplatelet Rx:• No hx of stroke/TIA• Weight ≥60 kg• Age <75 yr-14,909 patients (84% of prior MI cohort)

MI Cohort

1 Wiviott SD, et al. NEJM 2007

Page 6: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Baseline CharacteristicsPrior MI Cohort

Prior MI CohortN=17,779

Demographics Age, median (IQR) 59 (51-66) Age >=75 years (%) 8 Female (%) 21Clinical Characteristics Diabetes mellitus (%) 22 Hypertension (%) 63 Hyperlipidemia (%) 85 Current smoker (%) 20 Prior coronary revasc (%) 86 Any cerebrovascular event (%) 5Baseline Medical Therapy Aspirin (%) 98 Thienopyridine (%) 78 Lipid-lowering therapy (%) 96

No differences between treatment groups

MI Cohort

Page 7: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Primary Efficacy EvaluationPrior MI Cohort

CV Death, MI, or Stroke

8.1%

9.7%

Hazard Ratio 0.80;95% CI 0.72 - 0.89p < 0.001

Placebo

Vorapaxar

N = 17,779Mean f/u: 2.5 years

Vora Plac HR P-value CV Death 2.0 2.4 0.84 0.12 MI 5.7 7.0 0.79 <0.001 Stroke 1.3 1.6 0.77 0.06

MI Cohort

Page 8: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Efficacy by Time from Qual MIPrior MI Cohort

Time from qualifying MI to Randomizations

7.1%

8.8%

HR 0.82p = 0.011

< 3 months 3 to 6 months >6 monthsHR 0.79

p = 0.023HR 0.78

p = 0.026

7.5%

9.4%8.9%

10.4%

N = 7801 N = 5151 N = 4703

MI Cohort

Page 9: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Efficacy Early and LatePrior MI Cohort

Days 0 to 360

3.2%

4.0%

HR 0.79p = 0.003

Day 360 to 1080

5.5%

6.5%HR 0.82

p = 0.004

MI Cohort

Page 10: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Efficacy in Key Subgroups Prior MI Cohort

MI Cohort

Page 11: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Bleeding EndpointsPrior MI Cohort

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2.1

10.4

1.60.4 0.1

3.4

15.1

2.20.6 0.2

PlaceboVorapaxar

HR 1.61p < 0.001

HR 1.49p < 0.001

HR 1.29p = 0.033

HR 1.54p = 0.076

HR 1.56p = 0.30

3-yr KM rates (%)

MI Cohort

* TIMI Major/Minor/Requiring medical attention

3-yr KM rate (%) Voran=8880

Placn=8849 HR

p-value

All-cause death, MI, stroke, GUSTO Severe bleeding

10.1 11.4 0.86 0.003

CV Death, MI, Stroke, UCR, GUSTO Mod/Severe bleeding

12.5 13.4 0.91 0.038

Net Clinical Outcome

GU

STO

Mod

erat

e / S

ever

e B

leed

ing

(%)

Page 12: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Bleeding in Select SubgroupsPrior MI Cohort

0

2

4

6

8

1.9

4.6

2.13.1

2.1

3.4

1.8

3.93.0

7.1

3.2

6.0

3.2

8.0

2.7

6.9

Placebo Vorapaxar

MI Cohort

Age Weight Prior Stroke/TIA

Any High Risk Feature

<75 yr >75 yr >60 kg <60 kg No Yes No Yes

3-yr

Kap

lan-

Mei

er ra

tes

(%)

GUSTO Mod/Severe

Bleeding

Page 13: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Efficacy EvaluationLow Bleeding Risk Cohort (N= 14,909)

CV Death

6.8%

8.6%

Placebo

Vorapaxar

HR 0.75p < 0.0001

CV Death, MI, or Stroke

1.5%

2.0%

MI Cohort

HR 0.73p = 0.02

Page 14: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

SummaryWhen added to standard of care including aspirin ± thienopyridine in stable pts w/ hx prior MI, vorapaxar significantly:• ↓ CV death, MI, or stroke• ↑ mod & severe bleeding• Improved net clinical outcome

The benefit of vorapaxar was consistent:• Regardless of the timing of MI• Both early (<1 yr) and late (>1 yr from rando.)• With or without thienopyridine use

MI Cohort

Page 15: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

Conclusions

In appropriately selected patients, our findings demonstrate the benefit of prolonged antiplatelet therapy through inhibition of PAR-1, when added to ASA + thienopyridine for long-term 2° prevention in patients with prior MI

MI Cohort

Page 16: Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

www.thelancet.com

MI Cohort

Now available online