€¦ · volume 2 1.3.3 assessment criteria page 1-11 viii) iwi or hapu management plans. ix)...

Volume 2 1.3.3 Assessment Criteria -11

viii) Iwi or Hapu Management Plans.

ix) Waikato River Vision and Strategy.

x) Master Plans.

B Design and Layout

General

B1 Whether the proposed building design and / or site layout is consistent with the

provisions of any relevant design guide in Appendix 1 Section 1.4.

Note, if an activity is a Restricted Discretionary Activity solely to Design and Layout

matters and there is a relevant design guide; then the activity should seek to address

the outcomes sought in the design guide as a priority over any other criteria in this

section.

B2 Whether the external appearance, scale and design of buildings (including material

and colour), equipment and structures:

a) Provide visual interest through a variety of styles and forms in terms of

footprint, design and height.

b) Provide compatibility between the height of the building and its integration

with development on adjacent sites and the surrounding public space.

c) Are consistent with the purpose of the zone and make a positive

contribution to the character and amenity of the surrounding area,

streetscape qualities and adjoining land uses.

d) Are compatible with heritage or open space values of the Riverfront Overlay

area and adjoining riverbank area.

e) For corner sites, provide active frontages along both elevations that reflects

their potential as landmarks.

f) Enhance the experience of the Waikato riverside and Garden Place when

adjacent.

g) Would overshadow surrounding properties, or obstruct the views from

habitable rooms of surrounding properties.

h) Minimise effects on adjacent public spaces (including footpaths) in terms of

shading and daylight.

i) Contribute to local character and streetscape through bulk, scale,

modulation, rooflines, verandas, balconies and the choice of materials and

colour.

j) Incorporate crime prevention through environmental design principles.

k) Incorporate landscaping to enhance the amenity values of the site.

l) Enhance those parts of the site visible from public spaces e.g. major arterial

transport corridor frontages, state highways, and City gateways.

m) Reduce any adverse effects on the visual amenity of major arterial transport

corridors.

n) Provide for signage of an appropriate scale, design, number and location

consistent with the character of the area, and do not create adverse safety

effects.

B3 The cumulative effect of buildings and whether opportunities have been taken to

cluster buildings or ensure that areas are left free from buildings.

Comment [HCC14]: 862


Volume 2 1.3.3 Assessment Criteria Page 1-12

B4 The extent to which the proposed design provides or continues to provide for

informal surveillance of public spaces within and adjacent to the development

including streets, parks, plazas and through-site links where practical, by:

a) Locating doors, windows and other openings associated with living and

working areas, so that they overlook and interact with public spaces.

b) Locating primary entrances to buildings to face the transport corridor

frontage, with the main entrance located adjacent to the frontage with the

most pedestrian traffic.

B5 The extent to which building design will add interest and vitality to the streetscape

through articulation of a façade, attention to fenestration and rooflines, the design

of verandas and balconies and the careful choice of materials and colour.

B6 Whether the proposed building setback and the use of such setback will adversely

affect the definition, use and safety of public spaces, or the continuity of defined

shopping frontages.

B7 The extent to which the proposal:

a) Uses materials with low embodied energy content.

b) Includes suitable orientation to reduce the need for artificial lighting and

heating.

c) Minimises wind funnelling.

d) Uses durable, low maintenance materials and inert, exterior cladding to

maximise solar access and natural ventilation.

e) Uses materials from a renewable resource (where possible) and materials

that have a long life span and require low maintenance.

f) Incorporates water sensitive techniques and energy efficient design and

devices.

B8 The extent to which parking, manoeuvring areas, driveways and outdoor service

areas have been designed and located:

a) To avoid disturbance to surrounding sites and protect the acoustic privacy

and visual amenity of residents.

b) To protect amenity values of the streetscape and adjoining sites by

screening and landscaping.

c) To not be visually dominant.

d) To be away from the front of the site and buildings.

e) To ensure traffic generation minimises adverse effects on amenity values.

f) To minimise impacts on the stability of the riverbank.

g) To minimise traffic conflicts and provide safe and efficient vehicle circulation

on the site.

h) So as not to compromise the safe use of the footpath adjacent to the site.

i) To avoid fragmentation of the pattern of built development along the

streetscape.

j) To integrate with adjacent activities and development in terms of the

provision of entrances, publicly accessible spaces, verandas, parking, loading

areas, access to public transport and pedestrian linkages.

B9 The extent to which the proposed development obstructs public views from or

towards prominent natural or built landmarks, including to the Waikato River, St


Volume 2 1.3.3 Assessment Criteria Page 1-17

land uses.

e) Is able to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on the existing and

foreseeable future amenity of the area, particularly in relation to noise,

traffic generation, dust, odour and lighting.

Reverse Sensitivity

C2 The extent to which the development (including residential development):

a) Has been designed and located so that it minimises adverse effects arising

from neighbouring activities.

b) Minimises conflict with other activities on the site or on adjacent sites, and

ensures a reasonable degree of noise and visual privacy for occupants.

C3 The extent to which:

a) The activity could give rise to reverse sensitivity effects.

b) The potential for reverse sensitivity effects is minimised through the

positioning of entrance ways, private space and windows in relation to

service areas, outdoor dining or entertainment areas and extraction

equipment associated with adjacent activities.

C4 Whether the proposed location of activities avoids giving rise to the potential for

reverse sensitivity effects, including on the operation of existing activities within the

existing AgResearch Centre and on activities within the Ruakura Logistics Zone.

Residential Zone

C5 Whether the cumulative effects of a non-residential activity together with other

non-residential activities will result in an adverse effect to the residential character

of the neighbourhood.

Central City & Business Zones

C6

Whether the relationship of buildings and their associated parking, storage and

service areas to the street helps to maintain or enhance the amenity values of

public spaces and streets.

C7 Whether any parking or service area is provided, landscaped, screened and

maintained in a form which minimises any nuisance to adjacent activities and does

not detract from the streetscape.

C8 Whether the level of non-retail activity within a defined shopping frontage would

adversely affect the attraction of shoppers and visitors.

C9 Whether the level of veranda coverage, glazing or entrances to a defined shopping

frontage would enhance the attraction of the frontage for shoppers and visitors.

C10 The extent to which the non-retail activity is required to serve the needs of the

surrounding area taking into account other existing activities that may already

adequately serve these needs.

Future Urban Zone

C11 The extent to which the location and siting of effluent storage and disposal can

avoid effects to dwellings or adjoining sites.

C12 The extent to which the rural activity remains the predominant activity on the site.

C13 The extent to which any intensive farming activity has adverse effects of noise,

odour, vermin and other potential health hazards associated with such activities are

avoided or mitigated by management practices, site layout (placement and

orientation), design of buildings, screening and landscaping.



Proposed District Plan 13 November 2012 Hamilton City Council

Volume 1 15 Open Space Zones Page 15-14

i. New buildings and alterations to

buildings*

A2, A3, A4, C2-C3, C25, E1, J3-J4, S1, U3,

Y1

� B – Design and Layout

� D – Natural Character and Open

Space

� K – Major Facilities Concept Plan

Consistency

ii. Removal of vegetation or trees* A2, A3, A4, J2


Space

� F – Hazards and Safety

iii. Commercial activities on the surface of

water

A2, A3, A43, B5, M1, O2, W1, W2, W3


Space


� G – Transportation

iv. Pontoon/jetty A2, A3, A4, B5, V1-V3

� D- Natural Character and open Space


Standard Specific Matter of Discretion and Assessment

Criteria Reference Number

(Refer to Volume 2, Appendix 1.2)

v. Park maintenance buildings and public

toilets not complying with Rule 15.5.1

Site Coverage; 15.5.2 Gross Floor Area;

or 15.5.3 Number of Buildings

A1, A2, A3, C2-C3, C10, C18, J2, J3, J4, V1,

Y1

vi. Any other activity not complying with

any relevant site coverage standard in

Rule 15.5.1

A1, A2, A3, C2, C4, C6, C12, J3, J4

And J1-J2 when in Natural Open Space

Zone

vii. Any other activity not complying with

any relevant gross floor area standard

in Rule 15.5.2

A1, A2, A3, C6, C12, J3, J4

viii. Any other activity not complying with

the number of buildings standard in

Rule 15.5.3

A1, A2, A3, C2, C6, J3, J4

ix. Any other activity not complying with

any building height standard in Rule

15.5.4

A1, A2, A3, C14, C15, J3, J4

Comment [HCC1]: 862

Proposed District Plan 13 November 2012 Hamilton City Council

Volume 1 19 Historic Heritage Page 19-9

vi. Removal off site or relocation on site

of any structure or building ranked B

A2, A3, A4, I1-I3

� E – Heritage Values

vii. Signs* A2, A3, A4, I1-I2


viii. Earthworks involving 40m3

or more of

material in a single activity or

culmulative activities in any one year

period on a site in Group 1


Space



?? Signs on a site in Group 1 � E – Heritage Values

Formatted Table

Comment [HCC1]: 862

2 Strategic Framework Page 2-1

2 Strategic Framework

2.1 Introduction

This chapter contains a section 32 evaluation of the objectives, policies, and methods contained in Chapter 2: Strategic Framework of the Proposed District Plan.

The overall approach of the plan chapter is to provide clear and strong links between the District Plan, the City’s strategies, and regional and sub-regional strategies and policy to set out the direction for the City’s future spatial framework and urban design. The City strategies at the time of writing the District Plan are:

Access Hamilton 2010

Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy

Active Communities Strategy

Economic Development Strategy

Environmental Suitability Strategy

Social Wellbeing Strategy

Other chapters of this District Plan contain objectives, policies and rules that implement and support the strategic policy framework within each of the zone chapters and City-wide chapters.

The objectives and policies in the Strategic Framework chapter provide strategic guidance for all resource consent applications, but particularly those being assessed as discretionary or non-complying activities.

A key focus of the Strategic Framework chapter is to direct the future shape of the city in accordance with Future Proof, the Regional Policy Statement, and the Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy. This chapter reinforces the City’s strategy to increase the development density and regenerate existing urban areas of the City such as the Central City, suburban and neighbourhood centres, and locations near community facilities such as parks. It also identifies the planned sequence of development in greenfield areas for residential, commercial and industrial growth.

The strategic chapter also promotes the Waikato River and the unique identity, character and heritage of Hamilton, for which the Waikato River is a key component. Intricately connected to these objectives is the relationship Waikato Tainui has with the City and this is reinforced in the Strategic Framework chapter.

In addition the Strategic Framework chapter promotes concepts identified in regional policy and in the City’s strategies such as quality, safe and sustainable urban environments, the integrated provision of infrastructure and land development, resource efficient design, and protection and enhancement of the natural environment.

This section 32 report includes a high level assessment of rules only, because the rules that give effect to the objectives and policies in this chapter are included throughout the District Plan. More detailed assessments of the appropriateness of the rules are included in the section 32 assessment of other chapters of the District Plan.

Supporting documents are listed in the References section below.

Section 32 Hamilton City Council


2.2 Towards a Compact Sustainable City

2.2.1 Objectives

Objective most appropriate to achieve the purpose of the Act:

2.2.1 Hamilton is characterised by an increasingly sustainable urban form.

• This objective is most appropriate because it recognises the value of maintaining rural and urban environments by concentrating development in key urban areas. This is consistent with 7(c) and 7(f) of the Act which state that particular regard must be given to the maintenance and enhancement of amenity values and the quality of the environment. This objective is also consistent with the Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy, Future Proof, and the Regional Policy Statement which manage growth through compact city development.

2.2.2 Urban development takes place within areas identified for this purpose in a manner which utilises land and infrastructure most efficiently.

• This objective is most appropriate because it recognises the value of centralised development to make use of existing infrastructure and developed sites within urban environments. This is consistent with 7(b) which states that particular regard must be given to the efficient use of natural and physical resources. This objective further supports the Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy, Future Proof and the Regional Policy Statement which identifies key areas for consolidated growth.

Objectives not the most appropriate to achieve the purpose of the Act:

Do nothing. • This would not be appropriate, because it would not address issues of urban sprawl. It would not recognise amenity as well as the unsustainable environmental impacts of urban development, jeopardising greenfield areas.

Conclusion: Taking into account the above, Council considers that the objectives in this chapter of the plan are the most appropriate to achieve the purpose of the Act.

2.2.2 Policies

Policies most appropriate to achieve the objective:

2.2.1 Hamilton is characterised by an increasingly sustainable urban form.

Policies Effectiveness, efficiency, costs and benefits

2.2.1a Development shall make use

Benefits

• The policies provide for economic benefits by



of opportunities for urban intensification.

2.2.1b Development shall be designed and located to minimise energy and carbon use, by:

i. Minimising the need for private motor vehicle use.

ii. Encouraging walking, cycling and the use of passenger transport.

iii. Maximising opportunities for people to live, work and play within their local area.

intensifying development in the city through regeneration of existing areas and utilising existing infrastructure.

• Policies 2.2.1a and 2.2.1b have environmental benefits as they reduce the development of greenfield areas, provide for regeneration of existing areas and reduce the impact of development on the environment.

• Policies 2.2.1a and 2.2.1b have social benefits as they provide for safer and more community friendly residential areas.

Costs

• Economic costs associated with regeneration, upgrading and intensification of existing areas. (Policies 2.2.1a and 2.2.1b)

Efficient and Effective

• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.1 by catering for the intensification of development in urban areas as this is an efficient use of land and infrastructure resources.


2.2.2 Urban development takes place within areas identified for this purpose in a manner which utilises land and infrastructure most efficiently.


2.2.2a Development shall occur in locations that are consistent with the growth management policies of Future Proof, the Waikato Regional Policy Statement, and the Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy.

2.2.2b Any development that is within an identified growth area shall be undertaken in accordance with an approved Structure Plan.

2.2.2c The release of land for urban

Benefits

• The policies provide for economic benefits by consolidating development in areas that are specified for growth and are able to be connected appropriately to required infrastructure.

• Policies 2.2.2b and 2.2.2d have environmental and ecological benefits as they limit growth to areas identified as suitable and able to accommodate growth. The policies reduce the impact of development on the environment by giving preference to growth surrounding existing urban areas.

• Policies 2.2.2a and 2.2.1c have economic benefits as they provide for efficient and sustainable development of land that is able to support the required infrastructure and rural land identified



development will not be allowed unless appropriate infrastructure is available and the servicing of this land does not compromise the efficiency and sustainability of Council’s planned infrastructure.

2.2.2d The subdivision development or use of any rural land within an identified growth shall not compromise future urban development.

for growth will be able to be developed.

Costs

• Economic costs associated with consolidation of new urban developments in areas defined specifically for growth (policies 2.2.1a and 2.2.1b).


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.2 by providing a framework for the location of growth and development within the district. The policies also provide the means for efficient and effective use of greenfield land used for urban development and promote consistency between existing city strategies.

Policies not most appropriate to achieve the objectives:

Do nothing. • This approach would not be appropriate as growth within the district will result in urban sprawl.

• This would not be effective and efficient as there would be a strain on the environmental and ecological aspects of greenfield land.

• The cost of providing services and infrastructure for the spread of development would also be inefficient and would not promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources.

Risks

Risks of acting or not acting.

• The risks of acting are economic risks in terms of providing the infrastructure needed to cater for intensification and consolidation of development in urban areas.

• The risks of not acting are the rise of ad hoc development that is not consistent with the existing City Strategies and further economic risk in terms of providing infrastructure to a larger geographic area.

• Other risks associated with urban sprawl are a loss of social and community coherence. Developments will occupy isolated greenfield sites and be disconnected from other services available to concentrated urban development.

Conclusion: Taking into account the above, Council considers that the policies in this chapter are most appropriate to achieve the objectives.



2.2.3 Rules

Rules most appropriate to achieve the objectives:

Method Effectiveness, efficiency, costs and benefits

The rules that give effect to the compact city objectives and policies are included throughout other chapters of the District Plan and include:

i. Zoning to identify areas for urban growth, regeneration and intensification with density targets.

ii. Include criteria for identification and release of intensification areas including impacts on existing infrastructure and the requirement to provide additional infrastructure.

iii. Manage the release of greenfield land by retaining land not to be developed in the Future Urban Zone, and control the subdivision and development process after release.

Benefits

• Provides a clear spatial picture for the location and density of growth of the city in accordance with the Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy, Future Proof and the Regional Policy Statement that focuses on intensification of existing areas and planned expansions into greenfield areas that will use land efficiently, be co-ordinated with infrastructure provision, and minimise ad hoc development.

Costs

• Less flexibility for alternative forms of development.


• The rules will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 as the zones and rules throughout the District Plan encourage intensification within certain zones within the City, and manage the release and development of greenfield land.

The objectives and policies are assessment criteria for discretionary and non-complying activities.

Benefits

• This enables discretionary and non-complying activities, to be assessed against the broad strategic objectives and policies of the Plan. It enables activities which do not comply with the zone rules, such as a retail activity in a non-commercial zone, to be assessed against the strategic objectives for the City.

Costs

• Less flexibility for alternative forms and locations of development.




• This method will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 by ensuring that discretionary and non-complying activities are assessed within the broader strategic framework for the City.

Rules not most appropriate to achieve the objectives:

Do nothing. • This approach would not be most appropriate as it would not reinforce the strategic direction in the City’s strategies, and could result in ad hoc development.

Risks


• The risks of acting are economic risks in terms of providing the infrastructure needed to cater for intensification and consolidation of development in urban areas.

• The risks of not acting are that the District Plan will be inconsistent with the City’s strategies, the Regional Policy Statement and Future Proof. The potential increase in development that is inconsistent with the existing City Strategies, and economic risk in terms of providing infrastructure to a larger geographic area.

• Other risks associated with urban sprawl are a loss of social and community coherence. Developments will occupy isolated greenfield sites and will be disconnected from other services available to concentrated urban development.

Conclusion: Taking into account the above, Council considers that the methods in other chapters of the District Plan to support the objectives and policies in the Strategic Chapter are the most appropriate to achieve the objectives.

2.2.4 Methods Other Than Rules

Methods most appropriate to achieve the objectives:


Economic Instruments:

Development contribution and financial contribution policies which are consistent with the City’s strategies, Hamilton City’s “10-Year Plan”, Annual Plans and Activity Management Plans.

Benefits

• Consistent approach to regulatory controls across Council processes. Enables the true cost of development to be recognised and charged.

Costs

• Financial cost to those undertaking development.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 by ensuring that there is alignment between the District Plan and other documents, and to capture the costs of



undertaking development.

Other plans and legislation:

Waikato Regional Policy Statement, Regional Plan’s and Strategies (e.g. Regional Land Transport Strategy).

Other Regional or Sub-Regional strategies (e.g. Futureproof and Sub-Regional Three Waters Strategy).

Benefits

• These documents direct a consistent approach across Council processes through documents such as the annual plans, infrastructure plans, water catchment plans and budgets that are consistent with these regional documents.

Costs

• Financial cost to Council and the community to prepare and follow these plans.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 by ensuring that there is alignment between the District Plan and other Council documents and processes.

Council works and services (subject to annual plan):

Local Government Act 2002 policies and plans identifying community outcomes, establishing council financial policies, operational/management programmes and infrastructure plans (e.g. “10-Year Plan”, activity management plans, and budgets).

Provide infrastructure in a manner that supports residential, business, industrial activities in preferred locations in accordance with City and regional growth strategies.

Undertake demonstration projects (including public-private) for:

Mixed-use developments.

Higher density Central City living.

Council provides services such as inner city free

Benefits

• As noted above, annual plans etc provide a consistent approach across Council processes.

Costs

• Financial cost to Council to prepare plans and undertake these works.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 by ensuring that there is alignment between the District Plan and other Council projects.



wireless internet.

Information, education and advocacy:

Provide clear and consistent information about land release sequences under the growth strategy.

Advocate or promote:

Good quality urban design.

Improvements to passenger transport, walkable environments and the outcomes stated in the action plans developed under Access Hamilton.

The benefits of a compact city coupled with good urban design and the advantages of medium density and mixed-use development.

Benefit

• Increased understanding by the wider community of the direction of Council with regards to compact urban growth.

Costs

• Financial cost to Council to undertake these activities.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.1 and 2.2.2 by improving community understanding of Council’s strategic direction and potentially improving consistency of projects and processes with the strategic direction.

Risks


The risks of not acting are that other plans, activities and funding mechanisms will not be consistent with the City’s strategies and District Plan.

Conclusion: Taking into account the above, Council considers that the methods in this chapter are most appropriate to achieve the objectives.

2.3 Urban Design Approach

2.3.1 Objectives


2.2.3 Promote safe, sustainable, high quality urban environments that respond positively to their local context.

• This objective is most appropriate to achieve the purpose of the Act because it recognises the value of integrating urban development with the surrounding environment. This is consistent with section 5(a) of the Act, which is sustaining the potential of natural and physical resources. It is also consistent with 7(b), 7(c), 7(f) and 7(g) which state that particular regard must be given to the efficient use and development of natural and physical resources, the maintenance and enhancement of amenity values, the quality of the environment and any finite characteristics of



natural and physical resources.


Do nothing. • This would not be appropriate, because it would not promote quality urban environments or take into account safe, sustainable design and investment opportunity. It would not recognise the amenity of urban development.

Conclusion: Taking into account the above, Council considers that the objective in this chapter of the plan is the most appropriate to achieve the purpose of the Act.

2.3.2 Policies


2.2.3 Promote safe, sustainable, high quality urban environments that respond positively to their local context.


2.2.3a Development shall respond to best practice urban design and sustainable development principles, appropriate to its context.

2.2.3b Development shall respond to ‘Low Impact Urban Design and Development’ (LIUDD) and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles.

2.2.3c Development shall enhance the civic, natural heritage, ecology and surrounding public space networks.

Benefits

• The policies provide for economic benefits by requiring all development to be of best practice urban design which attracts further economic investment into the area.

• Policies 2.2.3a, 2.2.3b and 2.2.3c have environmental and ecological benefits as they require all development to be sustainable and to respond positively to the surrounding environment.

• Policies 2.2.3a and 2.2.3b have social and cultural benefits as they provide for safer and more community friendly residential areas that take into account visual amenity, public spaces and environmental design.

• Costs Economic costs associated with providing and monitoring best practice urban design for all development (Policies 2.2.3a and 2.2.3b).


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.3 by promoting the sustainable design of developments which takes into consideration visual amenity, environmental features, safety and responsive to the local



context.


Do nothing. • This approach would not be appropriate as development would not be designed in the best interest of the environment, the people and the economy.

• This would not be effective and efficient as it would not result in quality environmental outcomes, thus resulting in the longer term in economic and environmental costs.

• There would be a strain on the amenity and economic viability of developments as they would not integrate with existing infrastructure and development. Thus the purpose of the Resource Management Act would not be achieved, to sustainably manage the use of natural and physical resources.

Risks


• The risk of acting is that developers may feel that the policies are too restrictive and it may deter some developers from investing.

• The risk of not acting is that urban environments may develop without considering quality urban design and the surrounding context.


2.3.3 Rules



Structure Plans and rules in other chapters of the Plan that produce a consistent and coherent, design-led approach to development, and encourage good urban design, low impact urban design and development and crime prevention through environmental design.

Benefits

• Enables quality design of urban environments to be consistently addressed and to encourage quality design outcomes. The rules in the Plan support the direction outlined in the Strategic Framework Chapter.

Costs

• Economic costs to development to meet the requirements of the Plan, and potentially increased time and people involvement due to a design-based process.




• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.3 as they promote a consistent and coherent design-led approach to development throughout the District Plan, which supports the objectives and policies identified in the Strategic Framework Chapter as being of strategic importance to the city.


Benefits

• This enables discretionary and non-complying activities, to be assessed against the broad strategic objectives and policies of the Plan.

Costs

• Less flexibility for alternative forms of development.


• This method will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.3 by ensuring the discretionary and non-complying activities are assessed within the broader strategic framework objectives and policies for the City.


Do nothing. • This approach would not be the most appropriate as it would not promote a design-led approach to development that takes into consideration quality urban design, low impact urban design, and crime prevention through environmental design. This would potentially have long term costs associated with poorly designed buildings that do not incorporate safety and sustainability concerns into the design.

Risks


• The risk of acting is that developers may feel that the Plan is too restrictive and it may deter some investment.

• The risk of not acting is that it will be left to the discretion of individual developers to choose whether or not to have a design-led approach to development. This includes whether to design with consideration to good urban design, low impact outcomes, or outcomes that take a ‘crime prevention through environmental design’ approach. This in turn impacts on the form and function of the City.

Conclusion: Taking into account the above, Council considers that the rules in this chapter are most appropriate to achieve the objectives.






Council works and services (subject to funding):

Undertake demonstration projects (including public-private) for:

Mixed use developments.

Medium density residential.

Higher density Central City living.

Benefits

• Demonstration projects illustrate quality design outcomes in public places and can promote community understanding and buy-in.

Costs

• There are financial and process costs associated with developing a demonstration project.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.3 by supporting the outcomes expected from the District Plan, and providing good examples to illustrate the benefits of quality design to the community.


Advocate for good urban design.

Provide guides and technical advice for good quality urban design (e.g. Vista – highlights key urban design principles).

Benefits

• Provides quality information to support people in development to achieve quality urban design.

Costs

• Financial costs associated with development of these guidelines.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.3 by providing supporting information on, and awareness of, quality urban design.

Risks


• The risk of not acting is that the District Plan would be the sole tool promoting good urban design outcomes, and would lack the support of other tools to encourage these outcomes.


2.4 Central City, Business and Industry

2.4.1 Objectives




2.2.4 Establish a hierarchy of viable and vibrant business centres that provide a focus for retail, commercial and entertainment activities and serve the social, cultural, environmental and economic needs of the community.

• This objective is most appropriate because it recognises the value of maintaining a hierarchy of business centres to meet social, cultural, environmental and economic needs. This is consistent with 7(c) and 7(f) of the Act, which state that particular regard must be given to the maintenance and enhancement of amenity values and the quality of the environment. It is also consistent with Future Proof and Table 6-3 of the Proposed Regional Policy Statement.

2.2.5 Industrial and business activities contribute to the economic, social and environmental wellbeing and prosperity of the community.

• This objective is most appropriate because it recognises the value of industrial and business activities to the economic, social and environmental vibrancy of areas and increasing liveability and investment in the area. This is consistent with section 5(2) of the Act, which enables people and communities to provide for their social, economic, and cultural wellbeing and for their health and safety while sustaining natural and physical resources.


Do nothing. • This would not be appropriate, because it would not provide a hierarchy of business centres or recognise the value of business and industrial activities in meeting the needs of the community.

• It would also not recognise the amenity and environmental considerations associated with the location of these activities, or reinforce the spatial direction provided in Future Proof and the Regional Policy Statement.

Conclusion: Taking into account the above, Council considers that the objectives in this chapter of the plan are the most appropriate to achieve the purpose of the Act.

2.4.2 Policies


2.2.4 Establish a hierarchy of viable and vibrant business centres that provide a focus for retail, commercial and entertainment activities and serve the social, cultural, environmental and economic needs of the community.


2.2.4a Business activity and development shall locate in the most appropriate centre

Benefits

• The policies provide for economic benefits by prioritising development in the city and other



for its role, according to the following hierarchy:

i. The Central City is the primary business centre serving the City and wider region, and is the preferred location for significant office, commercial, retailing development and civic activities.

ii. Chartwell and Te Rapa North complement the Central City, to serve large parts of the City and adjoining districts, and contain primarily retailing, entertainment and services.

iii. Suburban centres, to provide convenience goods, community services, facilities and employment to serve immediate suburban catchments.

iv. Neighbourhood centres, to contain retailing and service activities to serve immediate residential catchments.

2.2.4b The distribution, type, scale and intensity of activities outside of the Central City shall not undermine the viability, vitality and vibrancy of the Central City, its amenity values, or role in meeting the needs of the region.

suburban centres to encourage regeneration and a clustering of activities and infrastructure. They also provide a clear spatial picture of how the City will develop into the future.

• Policies 2.2.4a, 2.2.4b and 2.2.4c have environmental benefits as they it promotes the development of business and industrial development in identified locations, reducing the impact of dispersed development on the environment.

• They also have social and cultural benefits as they provide for a hierarchy of business centres, including community friendly suburban areas, which provide for a range of community needs.

Costs

• Economic costs associated with regeneration, upgrading and intensification of existing centralised areas (policies 2.2.4a and 2.2.4c). There may also be costs arising from reduced flexibility to locate outside the identified areas.


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.4 by catering for development in identified areas as this is an efficient use of land, infrastructure resources and contributes to the vibrancy of the city. They also provide a clear spatial picture for the City that is in accordance with Future Proof and the Regional Policy Statement.


2.2.5 Industrial and business activities contribute to the economic, social and environmental wellbeing and prosperity of the community.




2.2.5a The positive effects of business and industry on economic, social and environmental wellbeing shall be encouraged and promoted.

2.2.5b Business and industrial activities and development shall utilise land allocated and serviced for business and industrial purposes.

Benefits

• The policies provide for and promote business and industrial activities utilising land allocated for business and industrial purposes and utilise existing infrastructure.

• The policies have environmental, social and economic benefits as they provide for business and industrial growth in areas identified suitable and able to accommodate and service such activities.

Costs

• Potential costs to developers associated with controlling the locations for business and industrial activities to locate.


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve Objective 2.2.5 by recognising the value of business and industrial activities to the economic, social and environmental needs of the community, and providing a framework for the efficient and effective development of business and industrial activities.


Do nothing. • This approach would not be appropriate as it would not identify and service land specifically for industrial and business purposes, leading potentially to a scarcity of land for these purposes, and conflicts with other land uses.

• It would also not support the vision for the City. This would not be effective and efficient and would not promote the sustainable management of natural and physical resources.

Risks


The risks of not acting are business and industrial activities will develop in areas that are not suited for the activities. The City Centre may lose its vibrancy and it will result in a less efficient use of resources and infrastructure. This will result in a decrease in the social, cultural, environmental and economic wellbeing of the community. There could also be increased conflicts between activities if industrial and business areas are not provided and serviced for those purposes.




2.4.3 Rules



Rules in other chapters of the District Plan will zone and control business and industrial activities according to the business centres hierarchy, and will also identify specific zones for regionally significant and strategic sites.

Benefits

• The benefits of this approach is to protect land for business and industrial purposes; to minimise conflicts between activities; to reinforce the spatial picture identified in Future Proof and the Regional Policy Statement; and to provide sufficient capacity to meet demand for business and industrial land over the next 20 or more years as identified in Future Proof and the RPS.

Costs

• The cost associated with this approach is a more restrictive approach to the location of activities within the City.


• These rules will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 2.2.4 and 2.2.5 as they clearly zone and provide for activities in accordance with the hierarchy of centres, industrial areas, and strategic sites identified in Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy, Future Proof and the Regional Policy Statement.


Benefits

• This enables discretionary and non-complying activities, to be assessed against the broad strategic objectives and policies of the Plan. It enables activities which do not comply with the zone rules, such as a retail activity in a non-commercial zone, to be assessed against the strategic objectives for the City.

Costs



• This method will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 2.2.4 and 2.2.5 by ensuring discretionary and non-complying activities are



assessed within the broader objectives and policies for the City.


Enable continued flexibility for business and industrial activities to locate in other zones, and also for non-business and industrial activities to locate in business and industrial zones.

This would not be appropriate, as it would not enable sufficient land for business and industrial purposes, and it would potentially increase the level of conflict between land uses in other zones e.g. residential zones. It would also not support the hierarchy of business centres approach identified in strategic and policy documents.

Risks


• The risks of not acting are that there could be increased conflicts between land uses, no business hierarchy which could undermine the City Centre, and a loss of business and industrial land for those purposes.

Conclusion: Taking into account the above, Council considers that the rules and zones in other chapters of the District Plan are most appropriate to achieve the objectives.




Council works and services:

Provide infrastructure in a manner that supports residential, business, and industrial activities in preferred locations in accordance with City and regional growth strategies

Benefits

• The benefit of these methods is to support the development of business and industrial activities with essential infrastructure.

Costs

• Financial costs associated with funding infrastructure.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.4 and 2.2.5 by providing necessary infrastructure to support development of business and industrial activities in the identified locations.


Provide clear and consistent information about the location of business and industrial activities in

Benefits

• To promote and encourage activities to locate in the identified area.

Costs

• Cost of producing or providing the information in



centres. written, visual or aural forms.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 2.2.4 and 2.2.5 by promoting increased awareness and understanding.

Risks


The risks of not acting are that development would be unable to occur without necessary infrastructure.


2.5 Residential Development

2.5.1 Objectives


2.2.6 A range of housing types and densities is available to meet the needs of a diverse range of people and communities.

• This objective is most appropriate because it recognises the value of providing a range of housing options to meet the varying needs of communities. This is consistent with section 5(2) of the Act, which enables people and communities to provide for their social, economic, and cultural wellbeing and for their health and safety.


Do nothing. • This would not be most appropriate, because it would not meet the varying needs of communities.


2.5.2 Policies


2.2.6 A range of housing types and densities is available to meet the needs of a diverse range of people and communities.


2.2.6a Residential development shall provide for a range of household choices and the diversity of cultural and

Benefits

• The policies have economic, social, cultural and environmental benefits by encouraging high density residential development in the City and



social needs.

2.2.6b Higher density residential development shall be located within and close to the Central City, suburban and neighbourhood centres, hospitals, tertiary education facilities and parks, open spaces, and other areas of high social amenity.

close to facilities that support high density living. The long term aim is to increase the vibrancy and activity in those locations, whilst providing for a range of housing needs within the City.

Costs

• There are economic costs associated with regeneration, upgrading and intensification of existing areas of the city.


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.6 by catering for the intensification of development in urban areas as this is an efficient use of land and infrastructure resources.


Do nothing. • This approach would not be appropriate as growth within the district will result in a lack of variety and lifestyle options within the City, or in locations that do not have the facilities to support this type of development.

Risks


• The risks of acting are economic risks in terms of providing a range of housing developments and ensuring that there is an adequate supply available to the local market. This may prove difficult and costly to implement.

• The risks of not acting are that the differing needs of the community will not be met; resulting in economic loss if residents move elsewhere.


2.5.3 Rules



Rules in other chapters of the District Plan identify areas for intensive residential development and set parameters for these, and in other areas restrict further development to retain existing residential

Benefits

• Encourage housing typologies which are not common in the City. This will increase the mix of housing typologies available to the community, in locations that will support the appropriate typology, whilst ensuring other areas retain their existing character.



densities and character.

Costs

• Less flexibility to develop any housing typology in any residential area.


• These rules will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.6 by promoting lifestyle choice in accordance with the Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy, and promoting higher average residential densities as envisaged in Future Proof.


Benefits

• This enables discretionary and non-complying activities to be assessed against the broad strategic objectives and policies of the Plan. It enables activities which do not comply such as a low density development in a high density zone, to be assessed against the strategic objectives for the City.

Costs



• This method will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.6 by ensuring discretionary and non-complying activities are assessed within the broader objectives and policies for the City.


No rules to encourage intensive residential development or to set parameters for these.

• This approach would not be appropriate as it would not encourage intensive residential development in the locations identified as being appropriate for it, nor would it set parameters for ensuring good quality intensive residential development.

• This would not be efficient or effective to achieve the objectives of making a range of housing types and densities available.

Risks


• The risks of not acting are that the differing needs of the community will not be met; resulting in an economic loss if residents move elsewhere.








Demonstration projects for medium density housing and mixed use development.

Benefits

• Provision of a visual demonstration of the objectives which Council hopes to achieve within the City.

Costs

• Financial costs associated with the development of a demonstration project.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve the objective by providing a visual demonstration of the outcome being sought.


Advocate or promote the benefits of a compact city coupled with good urban design and the advantages of medium density and mixed use development.

Benefits

• To promote and encourage medium density and mixed-use development.

Costs

• Cost of producing or providing the information in written, visual or aural forms.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 3.2.4 and 3.2.5 by promoting increased awareness and understanding.

Risks

Risks of acting or not acting:

• The risks of not acting are that the District Plan will not be supported by a range of other mechanisms which encourage mixed density housing and mixed use development.


2.6 The Waikato River

2.6.1 Objectives


2.2.7 This objective is most appropriate because it



The Waikato River is restored, protected and celebrated as being at the heart of the region’s identity and a feature of national importance.

recognises the value of preserving and protecting the Waikato River whilst recognising its regional and national importance. This is consistent with section 5(2)(a) and 5(2)(b) of the Act, which is the sustainable management of natural and physical resources and safeguarding the life-supporting capacity of water and ecosystems. It is also consistent with section 6(a) and 6(d) which shall recognise and provide for the preservation of the natural character, maintenance and enhancement of public access to and along lakes, and rivers. It is also consistent with sections 7(c) and 7(f) which state that particular regard must be given to the maintenance and enhancement of amenity values and the quality of the environment. It also recognises and supports the direction provided in Te Ture Whaimana o te Awa o Waikato – the Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River.


Do nothing. • This would not be appropriate because it would not recognise the regional and national importance of the Waikato River, or promote sustainable management of natural resources in accordance with section 5 of the Act.


2.6.2 Policies


2.2.7 The Waikato River is restored, protected and celebrated as being at the heart of the region’s identity and a feature of national importance.


2.2.7a The natural character of the Waikato River and its margins shall be protected from inappropriate subdivision, land use and development.

2.2.7b The natural, cultural, heritage and amenity values of the Waikato River shall be protected and enjoyed.

Benefits

• Policies 2.2.7a and 2.2.7b have environmental benefits as they protect and preserve the Waikato River from inappropriate development and maintain the values of the river.

• The policies have social and cultural benefits as they provide for connectivity and access of the river as well as provide for the historical and cultural significance of the river to Waikato-Tainui.

• Policies 2.2.7d and 2.2.7e recognise the Waikato- Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement



2.2.7c Access and connections with the Waikato River shall be maintained and enhanced.

2.2.7d The relationship of Waikato-Tainui with the Waikato River shall be recognised and provided for through a Joint Management Agreement.

2.2.7e Communities’ relationships with the Waikato River, including their economic, social, cultural and spiritual relationships, are restored and protected.

Act 2010 which will work in conjunction with the Act to provide direction to restore and protect the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River for existing and future generations.

Costs

• Economic costs associated with the provision and maintenance of access connections to the Waikato River, and potentially costs associated with limiting and controlling subdivision, land use and development near the river.


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.7 by catering for the protection, enhancement and maintenance of the Waikato River, recognising the cultural, economic and social significance of the area.


Do nothing.

• This approach would not be appropriate as it would not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana o te Awa o Waikato – the Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River.

Policies which encourage business opportunities to develop and make use of the visual amenity of the Waikato River.

• This approach would not be appropriate as the development of business opportunities around the Waikato River, without appropriate protections and preservation mechanisms in place, could result in adverse environmental and cultural effects, and would not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana o te Awa o Waikato – the Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River.

Risks


• There are no risks associated with the protection and celebration of the Waikato River.

• The risk of not acting is that the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River is not protected or restored.


2.6.3 Rules





Rules in other chapters of the District Plan that will give effect to this objective include:

Defining the river as a specific area, with subsequent development of a master plan for future development of the river corridor.

Encouraging improved access to the river through incentives and the subdivision process.

Managing land uses on and near the river.

Benefits

• The benefit of these rules is they integrate the District Plan’s approach to protecting, restoring and celebrating the Waikato River throughout the District Plan. They also enable a master plan to be developed for the River at a later date.

Costs

• There will be financial costs associated with protecting and restoring the river, and also in developing a master planned approach to the river corridor.


• These rules will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.7 by providing an initial framework to protect and manage activities and development on or near the river, with the intention of developing a master plan at a later date.


Benefits

• This enables discretionary and non-complying activities to be assessed against the broad strategic objectives and policies of the Plan including those relating to the Waikato River.

Costs

• Potentially less flexibility for alternative forms and locations of development.


• This method will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 2.2.7 by ensuring discretionary and non-complying activities are assessed within the broader objectives and policies for the City.


Do nothing. • This approach would not be effective as it would not give effect to Te Ture Whaimana o te Awa o Waikato – the Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River or enable the management, restoration and celebration of the river as outlined in objective 3.2.7.

Risks


• The risks of not acting are that the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River is not protected or restored through the land development process.








Develop a master Plan for future development of the river corridor.

Develop and implement Hamilton City Council Three Waters Management Plan.

Implement Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, (Hamilton City Council and other parties) through integrated river management plan and associated joint management agreements and documents.

Facilitate public access from the Central City to the riverbank.

Benefits

• The master plan will have benefits across the four wellbeings as it will enable a well-considered plan to be developed and subsequently incorporated into the District Plan via a plan change. The River Management Plan and associated agreements and documents will also enable a well considered approach to the river.

• The methods will also enable infrastructure planning and development that aligns with land use development objectives. It also provides environmental and social benefits through directly undertaking restoration projects and pathway development.

Costs

• There are financial costs to undertaking these projects.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.7 by restoring, protecting and celebrating the river through access provision, restoration projects and ensuring core Council services such as the provision of Three Waters infrastructure are undertaken in accordance with a Three Waters Strategy.

Risks


• The risks of not acting are that the District Plan relies on the development of a master plan and consequently will be less effective without it. Many of the works and services identified above are unlikely to occur if the District Plan is solely relied upon to achieve the objectives of the Plan.




2.7 Tangata Whenua, Waikato Tainui

2.7.1 Objectives


2.2.8 Resource management priorities are developed in partnership with tangata whenua.

2.2.9 The health and wellbeing of the Waikato River is restored and protected so that it may sustain abundant life and prosperous communities

• These objectives are the most appropriate because they recognise the value of consultation and partnership with tangata whenua. The Te Ture Whaiman o Te Awa o Waikato or Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River aims to sustain abundant life and prosperous communities. This is consistent with section 5(2) of the Act in that it enables communities to provide for their cultural wellbeing. This objective is also consistent with section 8 of the Act.


Do nothing. • This would not be appropriate because it would not provide for collaboration and consultation with tangata whenua. This would not promote sustainable management of natural resources in accordance with section 5 of the Act.


2.7.2 Policies

Policies most appropriate to achieve the objectives:

2.2.8 Resource management priorities are developed in partnership with tangata whenua.

and

2.2.9 The health and wellbeing of the Waiakto River is restored and protected so that it may sustain abundant life and prosperous communities.


2.2.8a The cultural and historic relationship tangata whenua have with the City shall be recognised and promoted.

2.2.8b Development shall consider effects on the unique

Benefits

• The policies provide for recognition and promotion of the relationship that tangata whenua have with the area, which will lead to developments that respect the cultural history of the area. The policies have social and cultural benefits as they provide for collaboration and consultation with tangata whenua in regards to the development of



tangata whenua relationships, values, aspirations, roles and responsibilities with respect to an area.

2.2.8c As part of the development process, decisions on land use, subdivision and development shall include ongoing consultation and collaboration with tangata whenua where appropriate.

2.2.8d Development and the decisions associated with developments shall consider any relevant Iwi Management Plan.

2.2.9a Promote programmes of action to achieve targets to improve the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River.

2.2.9b Promote an integrated, holistic and coordinated approach to the management of the natural, physical, cultural and historic resources of the Waikato River.

land that may be of cultural significance. This protects cultural values and places of historical importance.

• The policies provide for recognition and promotion of the ‘Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa Waikato’ – The Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River and its catchments. The vision is for a future where a healthy Waikato River sustains abundant life and prosperous communities. It aims to restore and protect the health and wellbeing of the Waikato River, for generations to come.

Costs

• There are financial costs associated with the provision of ongoing consultation time and process involved with development, subdivision and land use.


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.8 by catering for the protection of cultural values, recognising the historic and traditional significance of areas and tangata whenua’s direct relationship with the land.


Do nothing.

• This approach would not be appropriate as land use development may have an adverse impact on the cultural and historic significance of an area and thus have an adverse effect on the relationship tangata whenua have with that land and with the development.

Risks


• The risk of not acting is a breakdown in the relationship between Council, the community and tangata whenua.




2.7.3 Rules




Benefits

• This enables discretionary and non-complying activities to be assessed against the broad strategic objectives and policies of the Plan.

Costs



• This method will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 2.2.8 and 2.2.9 by ensuring discretionary and non-complying activities are assessed within the broader objectives and policies for the City.


Do nothing. • This approach would not be appropriate as land use developments might not consider the cultural and historic significance of an area or the relationship tangata whenua have with the development.

Risks








Adopt appropriate place and street names, commemorative signage or

Benefits

• This method will assist to recognise the cultural relationship between tangata whenua and the area, and will have educational benefits for the



pou.

Enhance identified Hamilton character areas, precincts and built and natural character.

wider community.

Costs

• Financial costs associated with undertaking these projects.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 2.2.8 and 2.2.9 by promoting the relationship between the tangata whenua and the City, and by promoting the Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River. Undertaking these projects would assist to develop and understand the resource management priorities of tangata whenua.

Involve and consult with tangata whenua.

Work with tangata whenua to improve community understanding of tikanga and customs (e.g. meaning and significance of waahi tapu sites, sensitivities about funeral activities near food retail activities and the scattering of ashes in waterways).

Benefits

• This method will assist to recognise the cultural relationship between tangata whenua and the area, and will have educational benefits for the wider community.

Costs

• Financial costs associated with undertaking these projects.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.8 by promoting the relationship between tangata whenua, the community and the City. Undertaking these projects would assist to develop and understand tikanga Māori.

Risks




2.8 Hamilton’s Identity, Character and Heritage

2.8.1 Objectives


2.2.10 Hamilton’s unique character,

• This objective recognises the value of preserving and enhancing the character of the built



heritage and identity are reflected in its built environment.

environment. This is consistent with section 5(2) of the Act as natural and physical resources are to be sustainably managed. It is also consistent with section 6(f) which refers recognising and providing for the protection of historic heritage from inappropriate subdivision, use and development.


Do nothing. • This would not be appropriate because it would not provide for the preservation and celebration of Hamilton’s unique character which would not promote sustainable management of natural and physical resources in accordance with section 5 of the Act.


2.8.2 Policies


2.2.9 Hamilton’s unique character, heritage and identity are reflected in its built environment.


2.2.10a Development shall be sensitive to and enhance Hamilton’s identity and character.

2.2.10b Development shall enhance Hamilton's unique character areas, precincts and projects through urban design and public art.

2.2.10c Development shall be sensitive to and protect Hamilton’s archaeological and cultural heritage sites, structures, areas, landscapes and places.

2.2.10d Development shall provide

Benefits

• The policies provide for economic benefits by providing a high level of visual amenity through urban design which highlights Hamilton’s character. This then encourages further investment and business opportunities.

• The policies have environmental benefits as they protect and preserve the character and identity of areas, protecting the environment from inappropriate development which may detract from the visual amenity of the area.

• Policies 2.2.10a, 2.2.10b and 2.2.10c have social and cultural benefits as they enhance the identity of Hamilton and promote a sense of community cohesiveness through urban design and public art.

Costs

• There may be costs to developers or to the Council in providing development that meets these policies.



for the protection of historic and cultural heritage from inappropriate subdivision, use and development.


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.10 by catering for the preservation and enhancement of Hamilton’s character and requiring further development to reflect surrounding amenity values.


Do nothing.

• This approach would not be appropriate as growth may have an adverse impact on the uniqueness and character of an area and detract from the visual amenity of spaces.

Risks


• The risks of acting are that in order to protect historical and archaeological aspects of Hamilton’s character there will be restrictions put in place that may prevent subdivision and other development. This may have an economic risk in that certain development may be hindered through protection of historical features.

• The risks of not acting are that the character and identity of Hamilton will not be recognised and implemented. The characteristics that are unique to Hamilton will not be preserved or enhanced through development which will detract from the visual amenity of the area.


2.8.3 Rules



Rules in other chapters of the District Plan will include:

Protection of heritage sites and areas.

Design standards which require development to address urban design and character.

Benefits

• The benefits of these rules are that they identify the areas that are particularly special to the City for social or cultural reasons, and endeavour to protect and promote these areas.

Costs

• There may be costs associated with managing development in these locations, or in promoting public art in particular localities.


• These rules will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.10 by recognising and protecting areas of unique character and heritage, and encouraging development of areas that will



enhance this further.


Benefits

This enables discretionary and non-complying activities to be assessed against the broad strategic objectives and policies of the Plan.

Costs

Potentially less flexibility for alternative forms and locations of development.


This method will be efficient and effective to achieve objectives 2.2.10 by ensuring discretionary and non-complying activities are assessed within the broader objectives and policies for the City.


No rules to identify or protect character, heritage and identity.

This approach would not be most appropriate as it would not protect or enhance existing areas of unique character, heritage and identity.

Risks


• The risk of not acting is the character and identity of Hamilton will not be enhanced.






Construct gateways, under the Gateways Policy, including securing land.

Implement the Public Art Plan and commission public art.


Benefits

• The benefit of these methods is direct provision of projects which will achieve the objective and policies.

Costs

• The costs are primarily financial costs.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.10 by direct provision of projects which achieve the objective and policies.



Risks


• The risk of not acting is that the character and identity of Hamilton will not be enhanced.




2.9 Natural Environment

2.9.1 Objectives


2.2.11 Land use and development protects and enhances natural features, ecosystems and landscapes.

• This objective is most appropriate because it recognises the value of preserving and enhancing the natural environment. This is consistent with:

• section 5(2) of the Act in that natural and physical resources are to be sustainably managed.

• section 6(b) and (c) with regards to the protection of outstanding natural features and landscapes, and indigenous flora and fauna from inappropriate subdivision, use and development.

• section 7(d) which states that particular regard must be given to the intrinsic values of ecosystems.

• This also gives effect to the City’s Environmental Sustainability strategy.


Do nothing. • This would not be appropriate because it would not provide for the preservation and enhancement of Hamilton’s ecosystems and landscapes which would not promote sustainable management of natural resources in accordance with section 5 of the Act.


2.9.2 Policies


2.2.11 Land use and development protects and enhances natural features, ecosystems and landscapes.


2.2.11a Development shall protect and promote positive outcomes for indigenous biodiversity in the Waikato

Benefits

• The policies have environmental benefits as they protect and preserve the environment. This protects the environment from inappropriate development which may detract from the visual



Region.

2.2.11b Development shall, where possible, enhance ecological corridors.

amenity of the area and ecology of the city, and encourages the environment to be considered in all decisions.

Costs

• There could be financial costs to some development when protecting and promoting the environment.


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.11 by catering for the preservation and enhancement of Hamilton’s natural environment. These policies are also consistent with the Waikato Regional Policy Statement and other City Strategies.


Do nothing.

• This approach would not be appropriate as development may have an adverse impact on Hamilton’s ecological and environmental values and thus detract from the City.

Risks


• There are no risks associated with the preservation of environmental and ecological integrity.

• The risks of not acting are a loss of indigenous flora and fauna, ecological integrity and visual amenity through development and growth that is not designed to protect and enhance the environment.


2.9.3 Rules



Rules in other chapters of the Plan include the following:

Rules to identify and protect areas with high landscape and ecological values, manage effects on the ecology and landscapes of the City, and enhance

Benefits

• The environmental benefits of these rules will be to identify and protect identified natural features, ecosystems and landscapes, and to enable all development to be managed to minimise effects on the environment and where possible enhance ecological integrity.



ecological integrity where possible.

Costs

• There could be financial costs to some development when protecting and enhancing the environment.


• These rules will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.11 by identifying at the strategic level the importance of protection and enhancement of the natural environment, and thereby giving effect to the Act.


Benefits


Costs





No rules regarding protection, management or enhancement of natural features, ecosystems and landscapes.

• This method would not be appropriate as it would not give effect to the objective.

Risks


• The risks of not acting are the loss of natural environment within the City.





Regulatory methods:

Incentives (e.g. development bonuses, rebates, financial

Benefits

• The benefit of this method is to encourage behaviour and activities which protect the natural



contributions for reserves, discounts) for proposals to:

• Retain plant or covenant native bush areas.

environment through providing a benefit to the person or organisation which undertakes the activity.

Costs

• There will be financial costs associated with this activity.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.11 by encouraging the retention of native vegetation through an incentive mechanism.



Benefits

• The benefit of this method is direct provision of projects which will achieve the objective and policies.

Costs

• The costs are primarily financial costs.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.11 by direct provision of projects which achieve the objective and policies.


Promote gully restoration and conservation of landscape and ecological values.

Benefits

• The benefit of this method is to work with the community to encourage positive outcomes for the natural environment, which has minimal costs for the Council, and provides for community involvement and ownership of these areas.

Costs

• There will be financial costs associated with promoting the activity. It relies on the community to respond to assist with the activity.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.11 by encouraging the community to become involved in restoration and conservation. This is effective in promoting community ownership of restoration and conservation projects and supports other more direct (e.g. Council works and services) methods.



Risks


The risks of not acting are:

• The District Plan rules help to protect the natural environment from the adverse effects of development, but rely upon development occurring in order for the rules to take effect. The other methods provide a greater range of tools to support enhancement of the natural environment. If the other methods are not used to support the District Plan the objective and policies regarding enhancement of the environment may be more difficult to achieve.


2.10 Resource Efficiency

2.10.1 Objectives


2.2.12 Efficient use and development of natural and physical resources, especially land, buildings and infrastructure.

• This objective is most appropriate because it recognises the value of preserving and enhancing the natural environment. This is consistent with section 5(2) of the Act to sustainably manage the use, development, and protection of natural and physical resources. It is also consistent with section 7(c) which states that particular regard must be given to the efficient use and development of resources.


Do nothing. • This would not be appropriate because it would not provide for the preservation and enhancement of Hamilton’s natural and physical environment, which would not promote sustainable management of natural resources in accordance with section 5 of the Act.


2.10.2 Policies


2.2.12 Efficient use and development of natural and physical resources, especially land, buildings and infrastructure.




2.2.12a Development shall enable and encourage waste minimisation and efficient use of resources through design and construction methods.

2.2.12b Buildings shall be designed so that they can be adapted in the future for a range of uses.

2.2.12c Development shall be designed to consider and adapt to the expected effects of climate change.

Benefits

• The policies provide for long term economic benefits by providing a sustainable approach to resource use and disposal.

• The policies have environmental benefits as they focus on sustainable use of resources when undertaking development.

• The policies have social and cultural benefits as they enhance the liveability of areas and promote sustainability through design and construction.

Costs

• There may be financial costs associated with development that incorporates concepts of long term sustainability and efficiency of buildings.


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.12 as they encourage design and construction that takes into account future use, climate change and resource efficiency.


Do nothing.

• This approach would not be appropriate as it would not promote the sustainable use of resources. It would allow development and the use of resources to occur without looking at the needs of future generations.

Risks


• The risks of not acting are environmental risks in terms of the inefficient use of resources. Without these policies development will not be encouraged to consider resource efficiency or future uses.

• It is likely more land would be used for development which resulting in an adverse environmental impact.


2.10.3 Rules



Rules are included in other chapters of the District Plan

Benefits

• The benefits of these rules are to enable District



as follows:

Encourage regeneration of existing areas and controlled expansion of new growth into greenfield areas.

Include rules to encourage energy efficient design, water efficient design and integrate land use with transport.

Enable waste management facilities.

Require storage areas in developments and waste minimisation in large developments.

Plan provisions that facilitate compact urban design that integrates transport and infrastructure, with controlled expansion into greenfield areas. This is considered to be a resource efficient approach to the use of land. It also enables facilities that promote resource efficiency to be provided for in the Plan, and requires a base level of design in buildings to cater for efficient use of waste.

Costs

• There are potentially opportunity costs associated with limiting alternative uses of land or design of buildings.


• These rules will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.12 by ensuring a whole of plan approach to efficient use and development of natural resources, and in particular land, buildings and infrastructure.


Benefits


Costs

• Potentially less flexibility for alternative forms and location of development.




No rules around resource efficiency.

• This would not be an appropriate mechanism to achieve the objectives of the Plan, as it would not encourage efficient use of land, buildings or infrastructure, and would rely on individuals to response (or not) to concepts around resource efficiency.



Risks


• The risks of not acting arise due to the semi-permanent nature of development. If land or buildings are developed in a resource inefficient manner they go onto operate inefficiently and many years pass before they are able to be redeveloped to be more efficient. Redevelopment to achieve efficiency will also incur more resources than if efficiency was designed and constructed from the outset








Secure necessary land, consents and designations for infrastructure (e.g. land for waste and recycling, and materials recovery activities).

Demonstrate technologies in key public sites.

Benefits

• The benefits of these Council works and services are the direct provision of infrastructure and facilities that address and support resource efficiency.

Costs

• There are financial costs associated with provision of these activities.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.12 by directly promoting resource efficient infrastructure and facilities.


Promote the Hamilton Waste Management and Minimisation Plan including:

• Waste audits and waste reduction to be carried out by high waste generating activities.

• Re-use, recycling and disposal of waste including demolition materials.

Benefits

• These methods are that they will provide information, education and advocacy to support the rules in the Plan, and Council works and services, to increase community support for resource efficient behaviour and activities.

Costs

• There will be financial costs associated with undertaking these activities.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.12 as they:

• Promote resource efficient behaviour.

• Encourage behaviours that will support the ongoing operation of facilities provided under Council works and services, e.g. material recovery facilities.

Economic instruments:

Develop public-private partnerships and joint ventures with the Crown and other Councils as appropriate.

Benefits

• The benefit of this method is to enable alternative funding and management mechanisms to further promote resource efficient outcomes.

Costs





• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.12 by providing alternative funding and management mechanisms to encourage the ongoing operation of resource efficient facilities.

Risks


• The risks of not acting are that this suite of other methods will not be in place to support rules in the District Plan, and consequently it is expected the objective would not be achieved to the same extent.


2.11 Integrate Land Use, Transport and Infrastructure

2.11.1 Objectives


2.2.13 Land use and development is integrated with the provision of infrastructure (including transport, Three Waters services and open space).

• This objective is most appropriate because it recognises the value of integrating land use developments with the development of infrastructure. This is consistent with section 5(2) of the Act, to sustainably manage the use and development of natural and physical resources. It is also consistent with section 7(c) which states particular regard must be given to the efficient use and development of resources.


Do nothing. • This would not be appropriate because it would not provide for the integration of Hamilton’s infrastructure developments which would not promote sustainable management of natural and physical resources in accordance with section 5 of the Act.




2.11.2 Policies


2.2.12 Land use and development is integrated with the provision of infrastructure (including transport, Three Waters services and open space).


2.2.13a Development shall not compromise the safe, efficient and effective operation and use of existing infrastructure.

2.2.13b Development shall allow for future infrastructure needs, including maintenance, upgrading and co-location where appropriate.

2.2.13c New development shall connect well with existing development.

2.2.13d Development shall not result in incompatible adjacent land uses, with respect to existing or planned infrastructure.

2.2.13e Rail, cycle, pedestrian, passenger transport and motorised vehicle networks shall be well connected and integrated across and beyond the City.

2.2.13f Development should promote strong connections to, and use of, passenger transport and active modes of transport.

Benefits

• The policies provide economic benefits for the community by providing a sustainable and efficient approach to land use and the provision of infrastructure that enables integrated development and efficient use of resources.

• The policies have environmental benefits as they promote well connected infrastructure and transport modes which reduce the impact of inefficient transportation and infrastructure systems. These have a lesser impact on the environment in terms of air quality and use of finite and infinite resources.

• The policies have social and cultural benefits as they enhance the liveability of areas and promote sustainability through design, connectedness and improving local integration of infrastructure.

Costs

• There are potentially opportunity costs in terms of how land would otherwise be developed.


• These policies will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.13 by catering for the integration of infrastructure and land use development.

• This is an efficient and effective use of land and infrastructure resources through connectedness, compatibility and the ability of development to cater for future maintenance and upgrading.


Do nothing. • This approach would not be appropriate as it



would not promote the sustainable use of resources.

• It would allow development and use of resources to occur without looking at the needs of future generations.

Risks


• The risks of not acting are inefficient use of land, where land uses are not integrated with infrastructure which leads to social, economic and environmental effects for the community.


2.11.3 Rules



Rules included in other chapters of the District Plan include:

• Providing for infrastructure to be integrated with development.

• Protect infrastructure from adverse effects of development.

• Development is located to maximise efficient use of infrastructure.

Benefits

• The benefit of these rules is to enable compact urban design that integrates transport and infrastructure, with controlled expansion into greenfield areas, which is a resource efficient approach to the use of land. The rules also enable development to be located to maximise efficient use of existing infrastructure and to protect infrastructure from development.

Costs

• There are potentially opportunity costs in terms of how land would otherwise be developed.


• These rules will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.13 by ensuring that land use and development is integrated with development of infrastructure.


Benefits

• This enables discretionary and non-complying activities to be assessed against the broad strategic objectives and policies of the Plan.

Costs

• Potentially less flexibility for alternative forms and location of development.






No rules integrating infrastructure and development.

• This would not be appropriate as it would not support the suite of objectives and policies in this Chapter and throughout the District Plan.

• Nor would this support the integrated, compact growth model, with planned expansions into greenfield areas that is outlined in Future Proof and the Regional Policy Statement.

Risks


• The risks of not acting are the potential outcome of a poorly integrated, inefficient City.





Regulatory methods:

Development contributions and financial contributions consistent with the City’s strategies.

Benefits

• The benefits of these methods are to provide Council with a budget to fund infrastructure related to growth.

Costs

• There will be a financial cost to development and to the Council to manage development.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.13 by providing funding for Council infrastructure associated with development.


• Annual plans, including infrastructure plans and budgets consistent with

Benefits

• The benefits of these council works and services are the direct provision of infrastructure and facilities for developments.



the city’s strategies.

• Free Wi-fi broadband provided in the Central City.

• Development of action plans as described in Access Hamilton for parking, safety, travel demand, active travel and public transport.

Costs

• The costs associated are financial costs of provision.


• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.13 by directly providing infrastructure associated with development.


• Advocate for the outcomes stated in Access Hamilton such as increased active travel modes.

Benefits

• The benefits of these methods are that they will provide information, education and advocacy to support the rules in the Plan, and Council works and services.

Costs



• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.13 by supporting a package that includes council works and services and District Plan rules with education, advocacy and information.

Collaboration/partnerships:

Work with other agencies to develop infrastructure that is integrated with land use

Benefits

• The benefits of these methods are to support the rules in the plan, and council works and services.

Costs



• These methods will be efficient and effective to achieve objective 2.2.13 by supporting a package that includes council works and services and District Plan rules with education, advocacy and information.



Risks


• The risks of not acting are that infrastructure will not be developed in an integrated manner with land use development.


2.12 References

• Future Proof (Waikato)

• Proposed Waikato Regional Policy Statement

• Waikato Regional Land Transport Strategy Programme

• Access Hamilton

• Hamilton’s Economic Development Strategy

• Hamilton’s Environmental Sustainability Strategy

• Hamilton’s City Design Guide Vista

• Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy

• Hamilton’s Social Wellbeing Strategy

• Hamilton’s Active Communities Strategy

• Resource Management Act 1991

• Te Ture Whaimana o te Awa o Waikato – The Vision and Strategy for the Waikato River

€¦ · volume 2 1.3.3 assessment criteria page 1-11 viii) iwi or hapu management plans. ix)...

Documents