voice morphing 12

8/8/2019 Voice Morphing 12

1/12

STQ Workshop, Sophia-Antipolis, February 11th, 2003

Packet loss concealment using

audio morphingFranck Bouteille

Pascal Scalart

Balazs Kvesi

PRESCOM SA, Lannion, FRANCE

France Telecom R&D, Lannion, FRANCE


2/12

MotivationI

n packet data networks, excess traffic leads to delays or loss in delivery ofinformation. In voice communication, long delays are intolerable and network

delay budgets have strong influence on the design of packet voice systems.

To increase the tolerance of packet voice systems to lost packets some

techniques have been developed.

These techniques do not use the a posterioriinformation of the nextpacket that indicates and detects the lost of one or several frames.

However those techniques are not adapted for long lost periods

(>15ms) because of the non long-term stationnarity of speech signal.

This a posteriori information is generally available because of the playout

buffer management and real time network protocol.

The technique proposed uses the knowledge of the frame received after the

last lost one, the models of the last received frames, and a model interpolation

to synthesized the missing signal.


3/12

Outline

Introduction

Morphing audio principle

Voiced / Unvoiced strategy

Modelisation and Interpolation

Blocks concatenation and smoothing

Some results of concealed signal

Comparisons and performances

Config

u

ration Results

Conclusion


4/12

Morphing audio principleContext of lost :

Previous Frame

Frame A

Missing Signal Next Frame

Frame B

Voiced/Unvoiced strategy

Pitch estimation

Frame A : P0

Pitch estimation

Frame B : P1

UVUV

VUV

UVV

VV

Frame BFrame AP0 , P1

P0 , P1 = P0P0 = P1 , P1

Unvoiced

signal

(400 z ) 2.5 ms 0, 1 15 ms (67 z)e eP P

When missing signalis defined as

unvoiced, Frame A iscopied to missingsignal or comfort

noise is generated


5/12

Morphing audio principle Modelisation and Interpolation: P0 and P1 are used to estimate the number of necessaryintermediate blocks (NbBloc) and the size of these blocks (SizeBloc).

max( 0, 1)!SizeBloc P PNbSampleLoss

Nb Bloc roundSizeBloc

!

-

We model the last pitch period vector (X

0) of the Frame A (Mod

P0)and the first pitch period vector (X1) of the Frame B (ModP1). DCT

(Dicret Cosinus Transform) is used to model X0 and X1. Resolution is 120points at 8kHz of sample frequency. Intermediate blocks, , are used in order to transform, in acontinuous way, the model vector ModP0 to the model vector ModP1 with

linear interpolation of model parameters.

iBlock

IDCT : Inverse Discrete Cosinus Transform.

120

1 00 *

0 1 0 k 120 1

0 1

i

ModP k Mod P k Block n IDCT ModP k i

NbBloc

i NbBloc

n SizeBloc

!

-

e e e e

e e

1


6/12

Morphing audio principle Blocks concatenation and smoothing

Each block is then copied in the synthesis frame.

. .

Smoothing

Frame A Frame B

Synthesis

Frame

0Block 1Block iBlock 1NbBlocBlock

Smoothing between blocks is realized according to:

(0) (0) * ( 1) (1 (0)) * (0)

( 1) : last sample o previous block (or rame)

y(0) : irst sample o current block (or rame)

( ) ( ) * ( 1) (1 ( )) * ( )

1( ) : moothing actor ( ) 1

x x y

x

x i j x i i y i

ii i

NbPSmoothing

E E

E E

E E

!

!

!

1

0 i NbPSmoothinge


7/12

Morphing audio principle Some results of concealed signal

Conceal

frame

Nb sampleNb sample

Original

frame

Case of voiced frames of a female speechsignal (30ms of missing signal)


8/12

Morphing audio principle Some results of concealed signal

Behaviour of the morphing technique during a transition frame (30ms)for male speech signal.

Original

frame

Nb sample

Conceal

frame

Nb sample

We can notice that the concealed speech to noise transition is more voiced

than original frame. In an enhanced morphing techniqu

e the voiced du

rationcould be controlled.


9/12

Comparisons and performances

Configuration Two speech coders (G.711 and G.723.1) were independently tested,T

he size frame is 30

ms; Five concealment techniques : Previous Frame Copy: PFC, double SidedPeriodic Substitution: DSPS1, ITU-Trecommended technique definedfor each specific coder: G.711 and G.723.1, GFEC technique2 and AudioMorphing;

Two series of rate were defined: 5 % and 10 %. The losses can appearby burst, but are usually isolated ;

The number of sentences was 15 (8 female and 7 male speech files)1 : J. Tang, "Evaluation of Double Sided Periodic Substitution (DSPS) Method for Recovering Missing

Speech in Packet Voice Communications," IEEE Computers and Communications, pp. 454-458, 1991.

2 : B. Kvesi, D. Massaloux, "Method of Packet Errors Cancellation Suitable for any Speech and Sound CompressionScheme", ETSI STQ Workshop, February 2003, Sophia-Antipolis

Ten subjects were participating to an informal test: they were

asked to listen to coded speech signals that have beencorrected by different concealment techniques


10/12

Comparisons and performances Results for G.711 codec

0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

7,00

Taux 5%

Taux 10%

Rate 5%

Rate 10%

Score (/15)

PFC FECG711 DSPS GFEC MORPHING


11/12

Comparisons and performances Results for G.723.1 codec

Note (/15) - G.723.1 - Taux de perte 5% et 10%

0,00

1,00

2,00

3,00

4,00

5,00

6,00

7,00

RTP FECG.723.1 DSPS KB Morphing

Taux 5%

Taux 10%

Rate 5%

Rate 10%

Score (/15)

PFC FECG723 DSPS GFEC MORPHING


12/12

Conclusion

Proposed technique improves the quality of theframe correction for strong lost rate (5 % and 10 %);

Morphing audio adds latency (Frame B is required),but is acceptable for application of VoIP;

Another modelisation are possible and voicedcondition can be controlled to improve restitution

quality

voice morphing 12

Documents