vn_herotozero
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 VN_HeroToZero
1/3
Mar 31st 2012 | HANOI | from the print edition
Vietnam
Hero to zeroThe Communist Party sticks to its principles and the
economy stalls
AMID the bustling trade and raucous traffic of the Vietnamese capital,
innumerable banners exhort citizens to Celebrate the Spring,
Celebrate the Party. These days, Hanoians do not have much to
celebrate. Not long ago, Vietnam was one of the developing worlds pin
-ups. Now it is lagging badly.
The most immediate concern is
inflation, which last year rose to above
20% for the second time in three years(see chart). Vietnam now has Asias
highest inflation rate, a fact that
government censors have asked local
journalists to stop reporting. Thousands
of businesses have gone bankrupt,
property prices have collapsed and
banks and state-owned enterprises
(SOEs) are riddled with bad debts.
The reversal has been sudden. Vietnams GDP increased by more than8% a year from 2003 to 2007, when the country attracted a surge of
foreign investment. Now the World Bank is predicting that growth will
average 6% a year in the five-year period up to the end of 2012.
McKinsey, a consultancy, argues that unless Vietnam boosts its labour
productivity by more than half, growth is likely to dwindle to below 5%.
That will be well short of the governments target of 7-8%. As McKinsey
1
-
8/2/2019 VN_HeroToZero
2/3
argues, the difference sounds small, but it isnt. By 2020, Vietnams
economy could be almost a third smaller than it would have been had
economy continued to grow at 7% a year.
Everyone, even communist leaders, agrees on the main reasons for the
slowdown. The poorly run, corrupt and wasteful SOEs, which accountfor about 40% of output, weigh the economy down. The formula of low
-wage, low-cost manufacturing no longer works as it once did.
Countries such as Cambodia and Bangladesh now undercut Vietnam in
cheap manufactures. Yet the country has failed to move up the value-
chain into more productive activities and higher-tech goods.
Frustratingly, however, realising this and doing something about it
seem to be two different things in the minds of Vietnams communist
rulers. A few optimists were hoping for changes at a three-day meeting
of senior party cadres last month. Alas, there was a lot of breast-
beating and little else. Nguyen Phu Trong, the general secretary of the
Communist Party, urged the party to reform if it wanted to avoid an
existential threat. But although his speech was made public, the rest of
the meetingin time-honoured fashiontook place behind closed
doors.
Calls by the party to reform or die are not new. Theyve been saying
that for 20 years, says Carl Thayer, an expert on Vietnamese politics
at the Australian Defence Force Academy in Canberra. What is missing,
now as in the past, is any detailed plan about how to implement
reforms such as restructuring the clunky state-owned sector,
streamlining public investment and improving transparency. Nine
executives from Vinashin, a debt-ridden state-owned shipbuilder, went
on trial on March 27th charged with mismanaging state resources. It is
the biggest case of its kind for several years, but the politicians who
encouraged and financed the companys grandiose expansion, including
the prime minister, are not likely to be held to account.
Even if there were a change of mind at the top, it would still be difficult
for leaders to implement change throughout the system. Power in
Vietnam is more dispersed than in neighbouring China, and vested
interests in business and politics are bigger obstacles to change.
Moreover, whereas Chinas Communist Party has had some success in
reinventing itself as an Ivy League-style networking club for the elite,
its comrades in Vietnam appear stuck in the past. The legitimacy won
-
8/2/2019 VN_HeroToZero
3/3
Copyright The Economist Newspaper Limited 2012. All rights reserved. Legal disclaimer
Accessibility Privacy policy Terms of use Help
from the print edition | Asia
by military victories more than a generation ago is fading into distant
memory, and Vietnamese leaders claim to economic competence is
increasingly difficult to sustain.