vitina, 13-14 march, 2008 1rural wings ip network usage analysis wp7.3 results of the usability...

16
1 RURAL WINGS IP Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

Upload: lily-allen

Post on 17-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

1 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Network usage analysisWP7.3

Results of the usability tests and recommendations

Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

Page 2: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

2 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Network usage & reliability monitoring system

Network activity monitored at hub level using SSPs monitoring tools.

Key achievement of RP2: implementation and validation (through the First Test Run periods) of a homogeneous Network Usage monitoring system and procedures for the 3 RW SSPs (Avanti, Hellas Sat and TTSA) coordinated by Astrium.

Steps: Metrics identification Graphs definition Procedures and deadlines Platform implementation / adaptation First Analysis of results Recommendations for next periods

Page 3: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

3 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Metrics identification

Network usage metrics: In & Out (typical Internet traffic asymmetry)

Traffic volume: total consumed bandwidth Applications & Protocols: volume distribution between different

applications Data rate: instant measure of the throughput

System reliability indicators: Time evolution of anomalies Mechanism of incidents notification Concerned network segment and equipment Type of incident Solution applied Intervention Resolution time

Page 4: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

4 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Graphs definition (1/2)

Raw data collected continuously

Simple treatment to obtain synthesis graphs and charts

Network usage graphs (Monthly basis) 1A Traffic volume per site 2A Global traffic volume per month 3A Detailed IN traffic volume per month 4A Detailed OUT traffic volume per month 5A Inbound Protocols distribution per site 6A Outbound Protocols distribution per site 7A Inbound protocol distribution per month 8A Outbound protocol distribution per month 9A Average IN Data rate per site and per month 10A Average OUT Data rate per site and per month 11A Histogram of sites average data rate

Page 5: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

5 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Network usage graphs (1/2)

Traffic volume per site

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Site A Site B Site C Site D Site E

Site de Validation

Vo

lum

e (M

Byt

es)

In traffic

Out trafficPilot Site

Pilot Site

Global traffic volume per month

01000

2000300040005000

600070008000

900010000

January February …

Months

Tra

ffic

(M

Byt

es)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Nu

mb

er

IN traffic

OUT traffic

Nb of deployed sites

Page 6: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

6 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Network usage graphs (2/2)

Protocol distribution (IN) per site

0%10%

20%30%

40%50%60%

70%80%

90%100%

Site A Site B Site C Site D Site E

Site de Validation

Tra

ffic

volu

me

(%)

All others

Videoconference

Instant messaging

Streaming

Mail

File transfer

Web brow sing

Average IN data rate per site and per month

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Site A Site B Site C Site D Site E

Site de Validation

Dat

a ra

te (

kbp

s)

January

February

Pilot Site

Pilot Site

Detailed OUT traffic volume per month

0%10%20%

30%40%50%60%70%

80%90%

100%

January February …

Months

Tra

ffic

volu

me

(%)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Num

ber

Site E

Site D

Site C

Site B

Site A

Nb of deployed sites

Page 7: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

7 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Graphs definition (2/2)

Reliability graphs (three-monthly basis) 1B Evolution of anomalies 2B Distribution of incidents per current status 3B Distribution of incidents per type of notification 4B Anomaly reports per involved segment 5B Distribution of incidents per equipment 6B Distribution of anomalies per type of failure 7B Distribution of incidents per downtime 8B Distribution of anomalies per type of intervention 9B Distribution of incidents per participant 10B Distribution of incidents per type of solution applied

Based on agreed Anomaly Reports Ticket

Page 8: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

8 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Reliability graphs

Rural Wings Anomalies evolution

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

November December January

Month

Nb

of

An

om

alie

s

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Nb

of

site

s

Anomalies

Nb of deployed sites

Involved segment

80%

0%

20%0% 0% Satellite

Backbone

Wireless

User

Other

Type of failure

20%

60%

20%0% 0%

Hardware

Software

Configuration

Manipulation

Other

Type of intervention

60%

40%

0%

On-site

Remote

None

Page 9: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

9 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Avanti Traffic Monitoring Platform

Main tool: Allot NetEnforcer/NetXplorer Bandwidth management: rules Network performance statistics: dedicated software, export to

statistical package

Most common statistics: BW, hosts, pipes, protocols Raw data:

.csv Macros Pivot tablesAgreed format

Page 10: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

10 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

TTSA Traffic Monitoring Platform

Main tool: Allot NetEnforcer(Turin Hub)/NetXplorer(Secure Hosting Platform in Paris)

Architecture

Traffic curves made available to users (NCs) via MedSky client application.

Page 11: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

11 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Hellas Sat Traffic Monitoring Platform

Main tool: Packeteer Packet Shaper 1700 Max BW: 45 Mbps

Configuration: In & Out traffic detection 1 group per RW Pilot site based on IP addressing detection

Raw data:

.csv files directly stored to database connected to Packeteer device

time/Outbound-avg-bps

/Outbound/Localhost-avg-bps

/Outbound/RW_27_in-avg-bps

/Outbound/RW_27_in/ActiveX-avg-bps

/Outbound/RW_27_in/BITS-avg-bps

/Outbound/RW_27_in/FlashVideo-avg-bps

/Outbound/RW_27_in/FTP-avg-bps

/Outbound/RW_27_in/GoogleEarth-avg-bps

/Outbound/RW_27_in/GoogleVideo-avg-bps …

03-Feb-2008 13:00:00 2890044 0 8892 12 0 1662 2 0 2 ...02-Feb-2008 13:00:00 2845170 0 7386 1 208 1604 1 203 6 ...01-Feb-2008 13:00:00 3180159 0 11577 7 28 2084 1 0 5 ...

31/01/2008 13:00 2735977 0 8293 5 48 1439 0 0 8 ...30/01/2008 13:00 3198027 0 6511 0 117 1208 1 0 1 ...

Page 12: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

12 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

First Test Run results – Traffic volume

Global traffic volume per month

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

December January

Months

Tra

ffic

(G

Byt

es)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Nu

mb

er

IN traffic

OUT traffic

Nb of deployed sites

Avanti Pilot Sites

Traffic Volume per Site for January 2008

0

0,2

0,4

0,6

0,8

1

1,2

TEO

RAMALLOSA

INSEAD

TARFALA

RUHNE

PIIRIS

SAARE

ENGELBERG

PRATS

ZAWOJA

POLANA

DEZNA

PIETRA A

RSA

FOURIER

HURA TECHSCHL

HURA MUNIC

IP

Site de Validation

Tra

ffic

Vo

lum

e (G

Byt

es)

In Traffic

Out Traffic

19.8 GBytes 128 GBytes

TTSA Pilot Sites

10,6 GBytes

6,7 GBytes

5,6 GBytes

Monitored period: Dec 07–Jan 08

Increase in the RW Pilot sites activity RW usages evolving and Internet access usage increasing

Download (In) >> Upload (Out)

Top sites per SSPs:• Dezna (TTSA) – 80.3 GB/362.5

GB• Cilcennin (Avanti) – 25.9

GB/3.2 GB• Parakentro (Hellas Sat) – 13.3

GB / 0.4 GB (Janv08)

Page 13: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

13 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

First Test Run results – Protocols

« All other » category: protocols not included in previous categories. Usually corresponds to P2P

Important presence of « All other » category in RW pilot sites. P2P control policy implemented?

TTSA included QoS rule for this type of protocols in Dec, decrease in P2P volume detected in Jan.

Important volume of http: Intensive web browsing http downloads P2P using port 80

To be followed closely

Protocol distribution (IN) per site for January 2008

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Valtet

siniko

Villa

ge

Agios N

ikolao

s Villa

ge

Gerak

i- Kas

teli

Mes

ta V

illage

Pyles v

illage

Enviro

nmen

tal s

tudie

s cen

ter/K

reito

u Ter

ra

Parak

entro

Cult

ure

Cente

r/Lem

ythou

Kleitso

s - F

ourn

a

Salako

s Villa

ge

Aigiali

Villa

ge

Site de Validation

Tra

ffic

vo

lum

e (%

)

All others

Videoconference

Instant messaging

Streaming

Mail

File transfer

Web browsing

Hellas Sat Pilot Sites

Inbound Protocol distribution per month

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

December January

Month

Per

cen

tag

e o

f T

ota

l Vo

lum

e

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Nu

mb

er

Others

Videoconference

MedSky

Voice Over IP

Instant Messaging

Streaming

Mail

File Transfer

Web Browsing

Nb of deployed sites

TTSA Pilot Sites

Page 14: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

14 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

First Test Run results - Anomalies

Registered Anomalies: Avanti (Dec 07- Jan08): 7 Hellas Sat (Dec06-Jan 08): 9 TTSA: 0 (?)

Notified through SSPs Help Desk Avanti: hub platform migration Sat modem

distant reconfiguration required (< 1 day) Hellas Sat:

ODU on site intervention (5-10 days) Sat modem remote reconfiguration (< 1 day)

Involved equipment

78%

11%

11%ODUSat-ModemPEP ROUTERRouterSwitchQoSWireless AntennaWireless BUWireless RelayUSER CPEHotspotOther

Hellas Sat Pilot Sites

Downtime

14%

28%

29%

29%

< 1 hour

1-5 hours

5-24 hours

1-2 days

5-10 days

> 10 days

Avanti Pilot Sites

Type of intervention

67%

33%On-siteRemoteNone

Hellas Sat Pilot Sites

Solution applied

29%

71%

Reboot

Replacement

Reconfiguration

Information

Other

Avanti Pilot Sites

Page 15: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

15 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Recommendations and Next Steps

RW Monitoring platform: validated!

Improvement on throughput statistics to come

P2P activity to be supervised closely by all SSPs

RW Pilot Sites Maintenance procedures crucial for successful site operation Roles to be clarified for SSPs, NCs & end-users

Anomaly report to be used also by NCs?

For next periods: Correlation with the number of end-users per site required (1

user = 1 PC) Further correlation with NCs and end-user system experience

Page 16: Vitina, 13-14 March, 2008 1RURAL WINGS IP Network usage analysis WP7.3 Results of the usability tests and recommendations Patricia INIGO (Astrium)

16 RURAL WINGS IPVitina, 13-14 March, 2008

Thank you for your attention.