visualization of ultrasonic wave in cast austenitic stainless
TRANSCRIPT
912
VISUALIZATION OF ULTRASONIC WAVE IN CAST AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL
PIPING
Kazunobu Sakamoto, JNES, JAPAN; Tsuyoshi Mihara, University of Toyama;
Takashi Furukawa, Ichiro Komura, Yoshinori Kamiyama, JAPEIC, JAPAN
ABSTRACT
Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES) has been carrying out the research program entitled
“Nondestructive Inspection Technologies for the Cast Stainless Steel Piping” since 2009FY to comprehend
the unique ultrasonic wave propagation in Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel (CASS) and to confirm detection
and sizing capability for flaws in the material by currently available ultrasonic testing techniques. The
research is also intended to provide inspection staff with the fundamental information of ultrasonic wave
propagation in CASS, for educational purpose.
This report presents visualization results of ultrasonic wave propagation in CASS piping and its
comparison with simulation model developed in the research program to make sure the validity.
INTRODUCTION
It is well known that volumetric inspection by ultrasonic testing (UT) for cast austenitic stainless steel
(CASS), which is extensively used in primary loop of Japanese pressurized water reactors (PWR), is
challenging due to beam skewing, dispersion and unexpected attenuation by its coarse and anisotropic
crystal structures resulted from manufacturing process. The miss or false calling of the flaws and the
deterioration of sizing performance are of great concerns in the UT for the material [1,2,3].
Numerical simulation models have been widely applied to studies of ultrasonic wave propagation
phenomena in anisotropic materials in recent years. In addition those simulation models are expected to be
used as tools for a setup of optimal inspection condition and verification of the inspection in the field as
well as improvement of inspection procedure, and the needs are growing increasingly in recent years [4,5].
To develop the accurate simulation model applicable to CASS material for those purposes, understanding
of the ultrasonic wave propagation characteristic is indispensable.
Under such circumstances, visualization of the ultrasonic wave propagation in the CASS are
performed to understand the unique phenomena such as beam skewing, dispersion and unexpected
attenuation precisely, using the CASS specimens whose material, size, dimension and welding method are
identical to Japanese PWR plants.
In addition a large scale finite element method (FEM) modeling technique for simulating the
ultrasonic wave propagation in CASS was developed to re-create not only the wave path but noise and
attenuation due to the coarse anisotropic crystal structure with accuracy to some extend. The simulation
results by developed model were compared with the actual wave propagation obtained through the
visualization technique.
SPECIMENS
Material applied in this study is presented in Figure 1. CASS welded joint mockup between Centrifugally
CASS (CCASS) and Statically CASS (SCASS), whose material, size, dimension and welding method are
identical to the most recent primary coolant piping in Japanese PWRs was prepared.
913
Figure 1 - Main coolant piping mockup
VISUALIZATION TEQUNIQUE OF ULTRASONIC WAVE PROPAGATION
Visualizing technique developed by T. Furukawa, et al. whose principle was illustrated in Figure 2 was
applied to observe the ultrasonic wave propagation in CASS [6]. The ultrasonic pulse is emitted by
transmitting probe which is set on the edge of specimen. Then the cross section of the specimen is scanned
using receiving probe to catch the elastic displacement on the surface. And synchronous display of the
received ultrasonic signals enables visualization of the wave propagation. In this study, ultrasonic waves
generated by PANAMETRICS V392 transducer (1.0MHz, 38mm diameter) are visualized whose nominal
angles of incidence are 0 and 36 degrees respectively, using acrylic resin wedge.
Figure 2 - Schematic image of the visualization
SIMULATION MODEL
FEM code
It is necessary to reproduce more precisely the ultrasonic wave propagation in CASS material which has
acoustical anisotropy. For this purpose, in the analysis using FEM, the nodes become the hundreds of
millions or more large-scale numbers. To satisfy these needs, the 3-dimensional FEM wave propagation
UT Pulse
Visualization Image
Probe (pitch)
Scanner (Y-Z axis)TP
DataSoftware
Probe (catch)
Scanner (Y-
Data
UT Equipment
914
analysis cord "ComWave" (Itochu Techo-Solutions Corporation) was applied to calculate the ultrasonic
wave propagation.
With regard to the mesh size, it was considered as the voxel component of 0.1 mm x 0.1 mm x 0.1
mm so that it becomes small enough to the longitudinal wavelength in CASS and wedge with a frequency
of 1MHz. The number of analysis steps was set to 14ns in consideration of the duration of longitudinal
wave propagation in one component.
Figure 3 - Probe model (1.0M38 LA36)
An example of the probe model used in this analysis is shown in Figure 3. The emitting ultrasonic wave
was made giving the initial displacement to the FEM mesh corresponding to a transducer. Figure 4 shows
the simulation analysis of the acoustic field emitted in Pyrex glass from the 1.0M38 LA36 transducer.
Figure 4 - Simulation of generated elastic wave from the transducer (1.0M38 LA36)
Crystal model
In the simulation model of UT to the anisotropic material, the acoustic characteristics of the texture has
mainly been modeled from the bulk material point of view. For example, since the acoustic feature of the
texture shows transverse isotropy, the columnar grain of austenitic steel has been dealt with as a hexagonal
crystal model. Although this model is useful to evaluate the propagation route of the ultrasonic wave,
expression of the noise and attenuation is difficult.
To enable practical use to the distinctive evaluation in defect detection or evaluation of the signal to
noise ratio in the simulation model, the cubic crystal model was applied. Following elastic coefficient of
915
cubic crystal which is calculated from the sound velocity measurement results is used [7, 8].
C11:215.0, C12: 128.5, C44: 117.1
Grain boundary model
In the modeling of a grain boundary, the macrographic view of cross section of a system mock-up was
reproduced precisely. Figure 5 shows an example of the model created by this method, together with the
original macrostructure photograph. In this case, each grain is expressed in 4 gradation patterns.
Voronoi diagram decomposition algorithm was also applied for crystalline region division
technique to model a variety of crystal structures [5]. The example of the CASS piping weld-zone model,
which imitated and created the crystal structure shown in Figure 5(1), in this process is presented in Figure
6. Here, each grain is expressed in 4 gradation patterns.
The elastic coefficient and crystal directions were assigned to each crystal grain model created by
reproducing macrographic view and Voronoi division [9].
(1) Macrographic view of cross section
Angled probe model
(45degree nominal, 1MHz, φ38mm)
(2) Reproduced crystal structure model
Figure 5 - Modeling of grain structures by reproducing macrographic view
OD Surface
SCASS CCASS
Weld
ID Surface
916
Figure 6 - CASS welding model by Voronoi decomposition
RESULTS
Figure 7 shows the snapshots of actual ultrasonic wave propagation and simulation result emitted from 45
degrees (nominal) probe into the SCASS. The solid and broken lines in the snapshots of Figure 7 (1) show
the theoretical energy flow direction and phase direction calculated by postulating the material as
transversally isotropic, respectively [10]. The solid line in the simulation result of Figure 7 (2), whose
grain structure was modeled by reproducing macrographic view, shows the theoretical energy flow, too. As
presented in Figure 7 (1), actual phase direction and energy flow conform to the theoretical one. The
simulation result presented in Figure 7 (2) shows the good agreement with the visualization result. And the
simulation result expressed scattered wave well.
Figure 8 illustrates the measurement and simulation results for the CCASS whose ultrasonic wave
was emitted from 45 degrees (nominal) probe. The solid and broken lines in the figures represent the
theoretical energy flow direction and phase direction. Figure 8 (1) shows the measurement result. And
Figure 8 (2) and (3) present the simulation result whose grain structures were modeled by reproducing
macrographic view and by Voronoi decomposition, respectively. Both simulation results show good
agreement with actual wave propagation presented in Figure 8 (1), with well reproduction of scattered
wave.
SUMMARY
The ultrasonic wave propagation in CASS was visualized by visualization techniques with relatively good
resolution. And the FEM simulation result showed good agreement with the actual ultrasonic wave
propagation.
917
(1) Measurement result
(2) Simulation result
Figure 7 - Simulation and visualization results of ultrasonic wave propagation into SCASS
Shear wave
Longitudinal wave
OD surface
ID surface SCASS CCASS
41.6 deg.
Scattered wave
918
Figure 8 - Simulation and visualization results of ultrasonic wave propagation into SCASS
REFERENCES
1) P. Lemaitre, T.D. Koble, “Report on the Evaluation of the Inspection Results of the Cast-to-Cast
PISC III Assemblies no. 41, 42 and Weld B of Assembly 43”, PISC III Report No. 34, European
Commission, 1995.
2) P. Lemaitre, T.D. Koble, “Report on the Evaluation of the Inspection Results of the Wrought-to-Cast
PISC III Assemblies 51 and Weld A of Assembly 43”, PISC III Report No. 35, European
Commission, 1995.
3) M. Anderson, et. al, “Assessment of Crack Detection in Heavy-Walled Cast Stainless Steel Piping
Welds Using Advanced Low-Frequency Ultrasonic Methods”, NUREG/CR-6933, prepared by
PNNL for the U.S. NRC, Washington, DC, 2007.
4) H. Ernst, K. Dressler, et.al, “Visualization of Ultrasonic Field in Anisotropic Stainless Steel
Castings”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on NDE in Relation to Structural
Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Components, May 2009, pp329-335.
5) F. Jenson, et. al, “Modeling of Ultrasonic Propagation in Cast Stainless Steels with Coarse Grained
Structures”, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on NDE in Relation to Structural
Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Components, May 2009, pp336-344.
919
6) T. Furukawa, H. Yoneyama, Y. Horii, N. Uesugi, "Measurement of Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in
Austenitic Stainless Steel Welds",Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on NDE in Relation
to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Components, JRC, New Orleans, May 24-26,
2000, B195-B201
7) B. A. AULD, “Acoustic fields and waves in solids, volume 1, second edition”, Krieger publishing
company inc., 1990, pp191-264.
8) K. Sakamoto, et. al, “Study on the Ultrasound Propagation in Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel”,
E-Journal of Advanced Maintenance Vol. 4-1, May 2012.
9) K. Sakamoto, et al, “Simulation of Ultrasonic Wave Propagation in Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel
Piping”, Maintenolocy Vol.11 No.2, Japan Society of Maintenology, July 2012.
10) B. A. AULD, “Acoustic fields and waves in solids, volume 2, second edition”, Krieger publishing
company inc., 1990, pp1-61.