vigabatrin: a comprehensive review of drug properties including clinical updates following recent...
TRANSCRIPT
1. Introduction
2. Overview
3. Regulatory history of
vigabatrin
4. The GABA System
5. Chemistry and pharmacology
of vigabatrin
6. Pharmacokinetics of vigabatrin
7. Clinical efficacy
8. Risk evaluation and mitigation
strategies for vigabatrin
9. Conclusion
10. Expert opinion
Drug Evaluation
Vigabatrin: a comprehensivereview of drug propertiesincluding clinical updatesfollowing recent FDA approvalJustin A Tolman† & Michele A FaulknerCreighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha,
NE 68178, USA
Background: Vigabatrin (Sabril�) was approved in the USA in mid-2009 for the
adjunctive treatment of refractory complex partial seizures and as treatment
of infantile spasms. Vigabatrin’s more than 30-year history of research and
development is condensed into a clinically relevant review pertaining to this
2009 approval. Methods/discussion: A review of the scientific literature was
conducted with special focus given to the drug molecule, its mechanism of
action, its effects on living systems (e.g., pharmacokinetic, pharmacologic and
toxicologic), and its anticipated role among antiepileptic drugs in the USA.
Conclusions: The recent approval of vigabatrin makes a significant addition to
antiepileptic drug options. The FDA implemented a Risk Evaluation and
Mitigation Strategy to control for the possibility of severe adverse drug events.
Keywords: complex partial seizures, epilepsy, GABA, GABA-transaminase, infantile spasms,
REMS, Sabril, seizure, vigabatrin
Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18):3077-3089
1. Introduction
In August 2009, vigabatrin (Sabril�; Box 1) was approved by the FDA as adjunctivetherapy for the treatment of refractory complex partial seizures (CPS) in adults andfor the treatment of infantile spasms (IS) [1]. This approval included a RiskEvaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to manage the risk of serious visionloss while still allowing access to this important antiepileptic drug (AED). Thisreview synthesizes and integrate the body of data for vigabatrin and provides expertopinions pursuant to the recent FDA approval.
2. Overview
Vigabatrin was approved for two very difficult to treat epileptic conditions, CPSand IS. Briefly, these epileptic conditions result from the disruption of normalelectrical signal generation, transduction or termination in large populations ofcortical neurons. CPS typically initiate in a focal area in the frontal or temporal lobesand rapidly propagate to other regions to precipitate a partial or complete alterationof consciousness with or without automatisms (including motor, sensory orsomatosensory, and/or psychic symptoms) [2]. The frequency with which CPSoccurs in the USA in persons aged 60 years or younger is approximately 20 per100,000. In those over the age of 60 years, the incidence increases to 80 per100,000 [3]. When seizures are difficult to control, the results can be devastating. Inthe most severe cases, uncontrolled CPS can lead to death from various causesincluding accidents or SUDEP (sudden unexplained death in someone withepilepsy), a condition where no underlying cause other than epilepsy can be
10.1517/14656560903451690 © 2009 Informa UK Ltd ISSN 1465-6566 3077All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or in part not permitted
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
identified [4]. Partial seizures are the seizure type most likely tobe refractory to treatment [5]. Several drugs are approved forthe initiation of treatment of CPS in the USA, includingcarbamazepine, phenytoin and valproic acid/divalproexsodium, and many others have been employed as adjunctivetherapy. However, owing to the refractory nature of CPS,therapeutic failure often occurs following treatment withseveral AEDs.In contrast to CPS, IS are primarily generalized seizures that
lack a focal area of onset. Typical diagnostic criteria for ISinclude neonatal or infantile myoclonic-type extensions orflexions involving the whole body and characteristically dis-organized electroencephalogram (EEG) wave patterns (i.e.,hypsarrhythmia) [6]. IS are rare, can be catastrophic in nature,and are associated with a wide variety of neuropathologicalabnormalities [7]. Prevalence in the USA is 0.6 per 1000 livebirths and limited by the patient age [8]. IS tends to be amongthe most treatment-resistant pediatric epilepsy syndromes [9].Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), prednisone, sodiumvalproate and benzodiazepines have been used in patientswith IS, but are often unsuccessful. Dozens of drugs forthe treatment of IS have been studied, but treatment successesremain elusive because of variable availability of the drugs,significant adverse effect profiles and unpredictable long-termprognoses [10]. Vigabatrin is the only approved drug for thetreatment of IS in the USA.
3. Regulatory history of vigabatrin
Vigabatrin was first created in 1977 as a rationally designedanalog to GABA [11]. Specifically, vigabatrin was synthesized tobind irreversibly toGABA-transaminase (GABA-T) and elevateGABA concentrations in the CNS, producing prolongedGABA-ergic effects [12]. In 1980, the sponsor filed an investi-gational new drug application (IND) with the FDA and soonbegan human drug testing under several protocols [13]. Duringthe mid-1980s, the identification of intramyelinic edema and
the possibility of irreversible neuronal injury in numerousanimal species occurred during continued preclinical testingand led to interruptions in patient enrollment in human trials.In 1994,MarionMerrell Dow (now Sanofi-Aventis) submitteda new drug application (NDA) following the collection ofsufficient efficacy information based in patients with CPS.However, this NDA was delayed as a result of insufficientand structurally deficient safety data within the submission.By1998, additional safetydata hadbeenprovided to theFDAtoallow the drug approval process to proceed [13]. During thattime, additional testing identified permanent peripheral visionloss as a possible adverse event associated with vigabatrintherapy and again derailed vigabatrin’s approval with theFDA. By 2007, additional studies had been conducted to allowthe Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs AdvisoryCommittee of the FDA in January 2009 to reconsidervigabatrin’s application. Following two advisory committeehearings, drug approval was recommendedwhich led directlyto vigabatrin’s approval in August 2009 as adjunctive therapyfor the treatment in refractory CPS. The Committee’s rec-ommendation for the inclusion of a REMS (including pre-scriber and patient registries, restricted drug access andrequirements for regularmonitoring for drug-related adverseevents) to minimize and evaluate the risk of peripheral visualfield loss while still providing drug access was also mandatedas part of vigabatrin’s approval [14-17]. At present, Lundbeck,Inc. holds the rights to vigabatrin in the USA following theacquisition of Ovation Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in March 2009and is now managing the REMS requirements through aspecial SHARE� (Support, Help, and Resources for Epilepsy)program [18].
Before these regulatory discussions with the FDA, vigaba-trin was approved in 50 countries (first approved by the UK in1989) with approximately 1.5 million patients having receivedthe medication [15]. Over the past 30 years, numerous basicscience and clinical data have been gathered for vigabatrinwith numerous scientific reviews already having been pub-lished [4,19-41]. The approval of vigabatrin warrants an updatedreview of the drug with expert opinions regarding its place inAED therapy. In addition, details of the REMS will beelucidated to allow physicians, pharmacists, patients, andcaregivers to use vigabatrin effectively.
4. The GABA System
Vigabatrin affects abnormal electrical signal activity throughmodulation of the g-aminobutyric acid (GABA, 4-aminobu-tyric acid) system (Figure 1). Extensive research continues toelucidate components of this system, and has been reviewedelsewhere [42-50]. Briefly, GABA synthesis occurs by the trans-amination of a-ketoglutarate, an intermediary in the citratecycle, to glutamate, which is then converted to GABA viaglutamate decarboxylase (Figure 2). Vesicularized GABA isthen released into the synapse after neuronal depolarization bya propagated action potential. Free GABA diffuses to the
Box 1. Drug summary.
Drug name Vigabatrin
Phase Launched
Indication Epilepsy
Pharmacologydescription
GABA aminotransferase inhibitor
Route of administration Alimentary, p.o.
Chemical structure
HO
O
N
Pivotal trial(s) [4,5,7,9,84-89]
Pharmaprojects - Copyright to Citeline Drug Intelligence (an Informa
business). Readers are referred to Informa-Pipeline (http://informa-
pipeline.citeline.com) and Citeline (http://informa.citeline.com).
Vigabatrin
3078 Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18)
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
postsynaptic membrane, binds and activates various GABAreceptors, including both ionotropic and metabotropic recep-tors, to produce inhibition of the postsynaptic neuron throughdirect or indirect regulation of ion-flux or subsequent neuro-transmitter release [51-53]. Unbound GABA is then rapidlyremoved from the synaptic cleft by glial, post-synaptic, andpre-synaptic cells to be catabolized by GABA-transaminase(GABA-T) to succinic semialdehyde, which can then re-enterthe citrate cycle [39]. Vigabatrin specifically affects the GABAsystem through inhibition of GABA-T to elevate GABAconcentrations and increase functional pools of GABA [38,41].The elevation in GABA concentrations is then thought tosuppress abnormal electrical activity, but this elevation hasnot been directly correlated with seizure control [54,55]. Vigaba-trin is highly selective and specific for GABA-T and does notdirectlyaffectother enzymaticpathways in theGABAsystem[25].
5. Chemistry and pharmacology of vigabatrin
5.1 Physicochemical properties and formulationsVigabatrin is a very lowmolecular weight compound (129MW)that is freely soluble in water, slightly soluble in alcohols (e.g.,methanol) and practically insoluble in halogenated solvents (e.g.,chloroform). The freely flowing white crystalline powder has amelting point of 209�C. The acidic and basic functional groupsimpart pKa values of 4.02 and 9.72, respectively [23]. Thehydrophilic functional groups balance with the lipohilicity ofthe molecule to give a partition coefficient (log P value) of-0.1 [23,56]. Despite this favorable partition coefficient to drugdiffusion, the impermeable nature of the blood–brain barrierprevents diffusion of vigabatrin into the CNS. However, vigaba-trinusesactive transportmechanisms forGABAtodistribute intocortical fluid and tissues [49,57-59]. Although vigabatrin is synthe-sized and currently formulated as a mixture of both the (R) and(S) racemates, only the S(+)-enantiomer of vigabatrin is
pharmacologically active owing to target site steric restric-tions [38,60]. Current formulations of vigabatrin include a500-mg sachet (containing povidone K30 as a binder to formgranulesof the active ingredient) and a500-mgtablet (containingpovidone K30, microcrystalline cellulose, magnesium stearateand sodium starch glycollate with the active ingredient in thetablet core andwith a hypromellose film coating). The tablets arescored and can be cut, crushed or compounded for patient orclinician preference or to allow for flexibility in dosage regimens.Vigabatrin has no discernable smell or taste.
5.2 Pharmacology and pharmacodynamics ofvigabatrinVigabatrin is an irreversible inhibitor of GABA-T. GABA-T isa homodimer composed of 472 amino acid sequence mono-mers that each contain an active site with a pyridoxal5¢-phosphate (PLP) cofactor covalently bound to Lys-329via a Schiff base (Figure 3A) [61]. Although there are disagree-ments in the literature regarding the exact mechanistic crea-tion of vigabatrin-transaminase intermediates, vigabatrinirreversibly inhibits GABA-T through the formation of acovalent link at the active site (Figures 3B and 4). Owing tostereoselectivity in the active site, only the (S)+ enantiomer ofvigabatrin is capable of forming this covalent linkage with theLys-329 residue [19,25]. This suicide inhibition then preventsGABA from entering the active site and effectively decreasesthe enzymatically active pool of GABA-T available for neu-rotransmitter inactivation [38,39,41]. Thus, the pharmacologicaction of vigabatrin lasts until inactivated enzymes can beturned over and can typically last for 4 – 6 days [19]. No dose ofvigabatrin has been shown to cause complete inhibition of allGABA-T activity, which is probably due to competitivebinding with GABA [19,62]. GABA concentrations in theCSF and blood have been reported to increase followingadministration of vigabatrin, but do not always correlatewith the drug doses or with seizure control [19,25,55,63,64].The pharmacodynamic profile of vigabatrin is complexbecause of the inactivation of GABA-T in both GABA-ergicneurons and glial cells. The dose required to achieve 50%inhibition of GABA-T activity has been reported to be30 mg/kg when administered twice daily [19].
6. Pharmacokinetics of vigabatrin
Vigabatrin has optimal properties for oral drug delivery and asubstantially different pharmacokinetic profile from manyother AED. The pharmacokinetic parameters of vigabatrinare unaffected by food [65] and are consistent followingmultiple doses [23,62]. The pharmacokinetic profile of vigabatrinalso demonstrates linear dose relationships over therapeutic andsupratherapeutic dose ranges [62,66]. The molecule’s high aque-ous solubility and membrane permeability result in rapid andthorough absorption of the dose, with maximal plasma drugconcentrations for both the (R) and (S) enantiomers observedwithin 1 – 2 h following oral administration, andmaximal drug
Vigabatrin(γ-vinyl GABA, 4-amino-5-ene-
hexanic acid
OH
O
H2N
γ-aminobutyric acid(GABA, 4-aminobutyric acid)
OH
O
H2N
Figure 1. Chemical structures of GABA and vigabatrin*.*Vigabatrin has a chiral center with stereoselective activity.
Tolman & Faulkner
Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18) 3079
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
concentrations observed in the CNS within 3 h [54,67-69]. Drugconcentrations in theCNS are approximately 10–15%of thosein plasma [70]. The sachet and tablet formulations are bioequiva-lent with an absolute bioavailability of 60 – 70% [23,71]. Vigaba-trin readily distributes in the blood with an apparent volume ofdistribution of 0.8 – 1.0 liters/kg with no appreciable plasmaprotein binding [23,41,66,72]. Vigabatrin’s simple pharmaco-phore, lowmolecular weight and high aqueous solubility prob-ably contribute to the almost complete renal elimination of thedrug [73-75]. Approximately 80% of the dose is eliminatedunchanged in the urine within 24 h, with less than 5% ofthe dose accounted for bymetabolites [25,67]. Drug elimination
is not dose dependent, and the plasma elimination half-life isapproximately 7 h in humans [19,21,76].
6.1 Special populationsAlthough data are limited, vigabatrin use in pediatrics hasresulted in a large increase in apparent oral drug clearance,with a 40% increase in neonates specifically, and requires arelative dose increase to achieve doses equipotent to those usedin adults [19,23,69,71]. Patients with altered gastric function,including elderly patients, can experience lower plasmavigabatrin concentrations as a result of delayed gastricemptying [23]. Patients with renal impairment are at increased
Citrate
Acetyl CoA
α-ketoglutarate
Succinate
Succinic semialdehydeGABA-T
GABA
Glutamate
Glutamatedehydrogenase
Glutamatedecarboxylase
Oxaloacetate
Figure 2. Biochemical synthesis of GABA from glutamate by glutamate decarboxylase and deactivation to succinicsemialdehyde and inactivation to succininc semialdehyde by GABA-transaminase.The circular pathway in the figure is a schematic of the citrate cycle with pertinent chemical intermediates indicated that relate to the GABA system. Selected enzyme
names are italicized.
GABA: g-Aminobutyric acid; GABA-T: g-Aminobutyric acid transferase.
A. B.
Figure 3. The GABA-T active site: the unoccupied active site containing Lys-329 with a covalently bound pyridoxal5¢-phosphate (PLP) cofactor (A); and the inactivated enzyme active site containing a covalently linked sequence ofLys-329, vigabatrin and PLP (B).These images were created from published crystal structures using the Molecular Operating Environment 2009 (MOE) software package (Chemical Computing Group,
Inc., Montreal, Canada) [61,100-102]. The protein backbone is indicated by the red ribbon and water was eliminated from the image for clarity.
Vigabatrin
3080 Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18)
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
risk for development of vigabatrin toxicity because ofdecreased vigabatrin clearance [23,71,73].
6.2 Drug interactionsInteractions between AEDs are concerns for the clinical man-agement of seizure disorders. Vigabatrin has a lower potentialfor interactions due to minimal hepatic drug metabolism andnegligible protein binding [32]. Although relativelyminor, somedrug interactions have been reported and require clinicaljudgment in monitoring therapeutic regimens. Specifically,vigabatrin has been reported to decrease both pentobarbitaland phenytoin drug concentrations [20,23]. Vigabatrin has alsobeen reported to increase carbamazepine clearance [77].
7. Clinical efficacy
The medical literature is replete with efficacy studies involvingvigabatrin owing to extended market availability in numerouscountries. Therefore, the review of clinical efficacy that follows
focuses on those studies that have been submitted to the FDAto support vigabatrin’s approval in the USA. Although long-term studies have shown sustained drug efficacy over time,there are limited data to indicate that tolerance to vigabatrin’seffects may develop in some initial responders [78-82]. Drugtolerance could possibly be due to decreased GABA synthesisin response to extended elevations in levels of GABAassociated with vigabatrin use [83].
7.1 Use in uncontrolled complex partial seizuresTwo studies evaluating the efficacy of vigabatrin in refractoryCPS were submitted to the FDA to support the drug’santicipated approval for this purpose. The first of these studiesconducted by French et al. was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, during which patients received 3 g ofvigabatrin (the most commonly studied dose in Europeantrials) in addition to other anti-seizure medications (two onaverage) [84]. Patients were between the ages of 18 and 60 yearsand had CPS with or without secondary generalization.
N
OH
OPHO
O
O
NH
OH
ONH
HN
O
N
OH
OPHO
O
O
NH
OH
ONH
HN
O
N
OH
OPHO
O
O
NH
OH
ONH
HN
O
N
OH
OP
HOO
O
NH OH
O
O
HN
NH2
H2N
OH
O
:
:VIG
+ +
+
N
OPHO
O
OH
NH
HN
PLP
Lys 329
+ +
O
O
Figure 4. The proposed mechanism of action for vigabatrin inactivation of GABA-transaminase (GABA-T).Lys-329 is the primary lysine residue in the active site. These structures were re-created from Storicci et al. [61].
VIG: Vigabatrin; PLP: Pyridoxal 5¢-phosphate.
Tolman & Faulkner
Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18) 3081
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
Previous therapy with either phenytoin or carbamazepine wasa requirement for enrollment. The first of the three trialsegments was a 12-week evaluation period, during which abaseline was established. The second segment was a drugtitration phase, during which patients were randomized toreceive either vigabatrin (n = 92) or placebo (n = 90). Duringthis 4-week phase, vigabatin was titrated to a dose of 2.5 g/dayin two divided doses. Over the first week of the final 12-weeksegment, the vigabatrin dose was increased to 3 g/day. Theprimary efficacy parameter was the number of seizures expe-rienced per month during the final 8 weeks of the study. Thedecrease in seizure frequency for those taking vigabatrin wasthree per 28 days versus 0.8 per 28 days for those givenplacebo (p = 0.0002). Overall, the median seizure reductionwas 39.5 versus 7.5% for vigabatrin and placebo respectively(p > 0.001). The mean number of seizure-free days in thevigabatrin group was 2.2 versus 0.5 for the placebo group(p = 0.0024). A 50% reduction in mean monthly seizurefrequency was achieved in 40 persons receiving vigabatrin,thus resulting in what the authors defined as therapeuticsuccess. At study end, five vigabatrin patients remainedseizure-free.The second submitted study, a placebo-controlled trial
conducted by Dean and colleagues, was a dose-response studyof vigabatrin for patients with uncontrolled CPS taking one ortwo additional anti-seizure medications [85]. This study wasalso divided in to three separate segments, the first of whichincluded 12 weeks of pretreatment evaluation. The secondsegment was a 6-week titration phase, and the third segmentwas a maintenance phase of 12 additional weeks. Doses ofvigabatrin included 1, 3 or 6 g/day (in divided doses) given topersons between the ages of 18 and 60 years with CPS (with orwithout secondary generalization; n = 149). As with theprevious trial, phenytoin or carbamazepine therapy had tohave been used and failed. The number of seizures occurringin an individual during the final 8 weeks of segment 1 wascompared with 28-day seizure frequency during the final8 weeks of the study as the primary measure of efficacy.The group receiving 1 g of vigabatrin experienced meandecrease in seizure frequency of 0.8 (p = 0.2 versus placebo).Those receiving 3 or 6 g of vigabatrin had a decrease of 4.3 and4.5 seizures respectively (p < 0.0001 vs placebo for both).Therapeutic success (again defined as at least a 50% reductionin seizure frequency) was achieved in 51 persons taking 3 gand 54 taking 6 g of vigabatrin (p < 0.0001 vs placebo). In thegroup receiving 1 g/day, 24 persons were considered to haveexperienced therapeutic success versus seven in the placebogroup (p = 0.0248). These results are consistent withEuropean studies concluding that optimal doses of vigabatrinare ‡ 2 g daily [86].A Cochrane review of the use of vigabatrin in patients with
refractory partial epilepsy (which included the two trialsdetailed above) evaluated 11 randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled, add-on trials [5]. The total number ofincluded patients was 755. The evaluated studies consistently
indicated that vigabatrin was capable of decreasing the overallfrequency of seizures, but long-term efficacy was not evaluablewith the studies used for comparison. Of note, quality oflife outcomes between placebo and vigabatrin were not foundto differ.
7.2 Use in infantile spasmsThree studies submitted to the FDA address the use ofvigabatrin in children with IS. One of these studies, conductedby Appleton and colleagues, evaluated vigabatrin as initialmonotherapy and was the first to look at the efficacy ofvigabatrin in newly diagnosed IS [87]. Study participantswere randomized to receive either placebo (n = 18) or activetreatment with vigabatrin (n = 16) at a dose of50 – 150 mg/kg/day. The baseline period lasted 2 or3 days depending on whether the participant had clustersof IS or isolated spasms. After the following 5 days, duringwhich subjects received study medication in a blinded fashion,an open-label trial phase of 24 weeks ensued. The primaryoutcome measure was the average percentage change in dailyIS frequency from baseline to the final day of the blindedtreatment phase. The reduction in IS frequency was 77.9% forvigabatrin users and 25.9% for those receiving placebo(p = 0.020). Fifteen of 36 subjects on vigabatrin monotherapyduring the open-label phase remained seizure-free, while aremaining four achieved seizure-free status with vigabatrin inaddition to a second medication.
In a second study of randomized, single-blind design,Elterman et al. evaluated the use of vigabatrin in childrenunder the age of 2 years who had been diagnosed with ISwithin the previous 3 months and were treatment naive [88].Participantswere given either high-dose (100– 148mg/kg/day)or low-dose (18 – 36 mg/kg/day) therapy for 14 days. Theprimary outcome measure was the number of subjects whowere spasm-free for 1 week beginning with the initial 2 weeksof therapy. If after 2 weeks IS was still present, doses wereincreased (the low-dose group was switched to high-dosetherapy). If spasms were still present 7 days later, doses couldbe titrated up to 200 mg/kg/day. Seventy-five and 67 subjectsreceived low- and high-dose vigabatrin respectively. Theprimary efficacy variable was met by eight subjects receivinglow-dose therapy. By contrast, the higher-dose group con-tained 24 subjects that met this criteria (p < 0.001). Responserates increased after the initial 2 weeks of therapy (8 versus65% at 3 months). Those receiving the higher-dose regimenresponded more quickly overall (p = 0.04). Sixteen per cent ofstudy subjects relapsed. The best responses were seen inpatients with tuberous sclerosis as the underlying cause ofIS (23 of 25 subjects who were spasm-free at 3 months).
The final study submitted to the FDA was completed insubjects with tuberous sclerosis, and was designed to comparevigabatrin to hydrocortisone [7]. Chiron and colleagues ran-domized 22 subjects to either vigabatrin 150 mg/kg/day orhydrocortisone 15 mg/kg/day for 1 month [9]. The primaryoutcome measure was spasm-free status. Nonresponders were
Vigabatrin
3082 Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18)
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
crossed over to the alternative treatment for an additionalmonth. Vigabatrin proved to be more efficacious, with 100%of subjects achieving the primary outcome. Of the 11subjects initially randomized to hydrocortisone therapy,five were spasm-free after the initial month (p < 0.01).The remaining six subjects all responded to therapy afterbeing crossed over to vigabatrin. The mean response time tovigabatrin therapy was 4 days compared with 12.8 days withhydrocortisone (p = 0.058). It is possible that statisticalsignificance would have been achieved if the treatmentgroups had been larger.
A Cochrane review of the treatment of IS found that moststudies had been open-label regardless of whether they wereprospective or retrospective [89]. It was noted that, overall,hormonal treatments (including corticosteroids and cosyntro-pin) tend to control spasms more quickly than doesvigabatrin – although some open-label prospective studies(including the study by Chiron et al.) indicate that vigabatrinactually acts more quickly than steroids. However, which drugsresult in the best long-term outcomes remains unknown. Itshould be noted that evidence of vigabatrin efficacy in patientswith tuberous sclerosis was particularly robust, suggesting thatthe drug should probably be considered the drug of choice inpatients with this condition.
7.3 Safety and tolerabilityIn the adult studies previously summarized, the most com-monly reported adverse effects were CNS in nature, partic-ularly drowsiness, dizziness and fatigue. The Cochrane reviewof vigabatrin use in partial epilepsy noted that these adverseeffects were significantly associated with vigabatrin throughoutthe medical literature, and ataxia was marginally associatedwith use [5]. Insomnia and irritability have been documentedin infants being given vigabatrin, and less frequently there havebeen reports of psychomotor agitation, hyperexcitability andaxial hypertonia [9,88]. No significant laboratory abnormalitieshave been routinely linked to vigabatrin [4]. Abnormal MRIresults have been reported in limited preclinical and clinicalreports [90-92]. A recent study evaluating MRI results inpatients before, during and after vigabatrin use was completedby Pearl et al. and found that 8 of 22 patients developed MRIabnormalities consistent with reversible cytotoxic edema [92].The MRI changes abated with medication withdrawal. All ofthe patients with abnormalities were being treated for IS,suggesting that infants are at higher risk. These data indicatethat vigabatrin should be ruled out as the cause of new-onsetMRI abnormalities.
Some time after the approval of vigabatrin outside the USA,reports of visual field defects (VFD) associated with its usebegan to surface. This led to vigabatrin’s designation asunapproveable by the FDA at that time [93]. It is likely thatthe delay in recognizing this link between the drug and visualfield changes was related to the asymptomatic nature of theproblem in up to 90% of patients [4]. The exact mechanism ofinjury leading to the defect is unknown. Slow progressive
changes in the function of the retinal ganglia are noted inpatients who develop the VFD [4]. Changes are bilateral, andevolve as concentric constriction of the peripheral visual field.Central visual acuity is nearly always unaffected [22]. Severitycan be mild to severe, and patients frequently use eye move-ment and head turning to compensate for the changes thatoccur [4,2]. Data indicate that VFDs are irreversible innature [10,22].
During drug development, fewer than one in 1000 patientswere reported to have VFDs [93]. Prevalence from efficacy trialsis reported to be much higher, with approximately 25 – 50%of adults affected [22]. The frequency with which VFDs occurin children and infants is lower, with about 15% of childrenaffected and 15 – 30% of infants developing the condition.Detecting the defect can be challenging. For patients aged9 years or older, kinetic perimeter assessment (the standardassessment method per the manufacturer of the drug) isreliable [93]. To diagnose VFDs in infants, abnormalitiesmust be detected with two consecutive confirmed electroret-inography readings [8]. With FDA approval, baseline VFDtesting is mandated for patients on vigabatrin and continuedtesting to be carried out at predetermined intervals.
It is difficult to predict which patients are likely to develop aVFD [7]. The earliest that changes have been noted in adultpatients is 9 months after treatment initiation [22]. In children,the earliest findings were found after 11 months. On average,changes have been noted in both adults and children betweenyears 5 and 6 of vigabatrin use [22]. Clinicians disagree onwhether a relationship between dose and/or duration oftherapy and VFDs exists [4,22]. In patients with IS, it isgenerally felt that the risk of the development of a VFDdoes not outweigh the risk of allowing continuation of thespasms, which frequently lead to severe learning disabil-ities [4,10]. In addition, many patients with IS already havesevere visual impairment, thus making the development of aVFD less concerning [87]. Vigabatrin remains a drug of choicefor the treatment of IS according to many pediatric epileptol-ogists [4]. However, in adults with CPS a more conservativeapproach is probably warranted. Multiple drug failures, andsome would argue surgical ineligibility, should be consideredcriteria for use [4]. A 12-week trial of vigabatrin is unlikelyto result in development of a VFD. If the drug has notbeen efficacious within this time frame, it should bediscontinued [22].
Another safety concern with vigabatrin has been an apparentassociationwithpsychiatricdisturbances.Thesignificanceof theassociation is complicatedby the fact that in the faceof refractoryCPS, many patients experience neuropsychiatric symptomsrelated to both the seizure disorder itself as well as commontherapeutic interventions [94]. A higher incidence of depressionhas been linked to seizure disorders in general [95]. Virtually allanti-epileptic medications have been associated with mentalstatus changes and psychiatric disturbances [96]. There are nostudies comparing the incidence of psychiatric events withvigabatrin and other anti-epileptic agents.
Tolman & Faulkner
Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18) 3083
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
Using manufacturer databases, Levinson and Devinskyevaluated the overall prevalence of various psychiatric disor-ders in patients exposed to vigabatrin therapy [95]. From asample of 1942 enrollees in 10 trials included in the analysis,the most commonly noted adverse events in patients with CPSwere agitation (9.9%), depression (8.7%) and anxiety (7.7%).Other conditions encountered (in order of frequency ofoccurrence) include aggression, emotional lability, psychosis,mania and suicide attempt (all with a prevalence < 5%).Vigabatrin-treated patients tended to have more serious events(study withdrawal due to symptoms, hospitalization, psychosisassociated with depression and suicide attempt) than didplacebo-treated patients (p < 0.001). However, the withdrawalrate in patients experiencing symptoms of depression was only1.5%. The difference in the incidence of psychiatric symptomswas also significant for those taking vigabatrin (p = 0.028),though 40% of patients with symptoms had a history positivefor psychosis. One theory as to why psychotic symptoms mayemerge is one of ‘forced normalization’ [96,97]. According tothis theory, the psychosis is related to an abrupt cessation ofseizure activity rather than the medication. It has been notedthat in patients known to have schizophrenia, vigabatrin usedoes not tend to exacerbate symptoms leading to the conclu-sion that a biochemical relationship alone is unlikely to beresponsible [95]. Possibly, changes in GABA associated withvigabatrin use produce excitement in some neuronal systemsleading to symptoms [96].A retrospective study of 133 patients was completed to assess
psychiatric symptoms in patients using vigabatrin [98]. Of the22 that discontinued therapy, nine did so because of changes inmood, seven because of agitation or irritability, and six becauseof symptoms of aggression. Psychotic symptoms were noted intwo patients when vigabatrin was stopped. Overall, the relativerisk of developing symptoms in patients with a positivepsychiatric history was 1.23 (p = 0.61). Therefore, the authorsfound no support for the argument that patients with a historyof psychiatric disturbances are predisposed to exacerbationwhen given vigabatrin. In addition, there seemed to be nocorrelation with starting the drug at a higher dose versus alower dose with slower titration. The authors hypothesizedthat patients in their population were highly resistant totreatment and were therefore more susceptible to adverseevents, including psychiatric symptoms [98].Though some symptoms (such as delusions and hallucina-
tions) are easily recognized, other symptoms are not, or theymay overlap. Confusion, aggression, agitation, changes inmood and emotional lability are significantly more subjective.Investigators may define symptoms with terms different fromother investigators. Furthermore, studies are usually unclearabout whether the symptoms occurred when the patient wascognitively clear or had a diminished sensorium [96]. There-fore, the true incidence of psychiatric events, and morespecifically the type of events, in persons using vigabatrin isdifficult to ascertain.
8. Risk evaluation andmitigation strategies forvigabatrin
Vigabatrin’s demonstrated efficacy and potential for improve-ment to the therapeutic management of CPS and IS will bebalanced by specific approaches to reduce, control or avoidadverse events. The FDA mandated risk evaluation andmitigation strategies (REMS) imposed numerous require-ments for providers and patients in the USA using vigabatrin.These requirements include a provision that patients andproviders taking or prescribing vigabatrin be enrolled inand comply with the guidelines of the SHARE� programbefore the initiation of vigabatrin therapy [99]. Of note, thoughthey must acknowledge their understanding of the risksassociated with vigabatrin use by signing an enrollment andagreement form, there are no specific requirements for addi-tional training and prescribers need not be neurologists orepilepsy specialists. Separate agreement forms must be com-pleted by the patient or the patients’ legal guardian beforeaccess to vigabatrin is granted. The required forms necessitatesignatures at the time of treatment initiation and again when adecision is made to continue therapy based on a positivepatient response such that the risks associated with medicationuse are felt to be overridden by the observed benefit. A separatetreatment maintenance form signed by the prescriber alsoneeds to be submitted when the decision to continue therapyis made.
The treatment initiation form contains several sectionsincluding the prescription. The first section requests detailsabout the patient including demographic information, thephysical location of the patient at the time of drug admin-istration (i.e., home, hospital or other facility), and requiresthe patient’s signature for the release of protected healthinformation. The second section details the patient’s insuranceinformation. Section 3 requires signatures from the prescriberand a representative of TheraCom, LLC (acting on behalf ofthe drug company) authorizing the business relationshipbetween the parties, and authorizing the release of informationto the patient’s insurance company. The fourth section is themedication-specific information that will serve as the prescrip-tion. As of the time of FDA approval, only four pharmacycompanies in the USA (all mail-order pharmacies) are autho-rized to dispense vigabatrin. Once a request for medication issubmitted via the SHARE program, coordination with one ofthe authorized pharmacies will occur according to the patient’sinsurance status. Neither the patient nor the prescriber hasinput into which pharmacy company will undertake thedispensing role. The final part of the form requests additionalpatient information, including which medications have beenused for the attempted control of seizures or spasms and howmany multidrug regimens were employed before the initiationof vigabatrin therapy.
Periodic visual assessment must be completed for therapy tobe ongoing as part of the REMS. The baseline assessment
Vigabatrin
3084 Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18)
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
must be undertaken and reviewed within 4 weeks of therapyinitiation. Thereafter, visual assessments must occur no lessoften than every 3 months and within 6 months of drugdiscontinuation. Therapy will be discontinued if the prescrib-ing physician fails to fax a completed ophthalmologic assess-ment form to the SHARE program. Official reminders will besent before the form due dates, and written warnings will besent to prescribers and patients alike if the forms are notreceived. Local pharmaceutical representatives will also benotified in the event of late reporting in order that they maymakedirect contactwith the prescriber to facilitate the receipt ofthe information to ensure uninterrupted therapy.
9. Conclusion
Vigabatrin has a substantial body of scientific and clinicalstudy with a long history of regulatory discussion beforeapproval in the USA. The medication has optimal propertiesfor oral drug delivery with low potential for the pharmaco-kinetic complications experienced with many of the otherAEDs. It has a clinically unique mechanism of action with thepossibility for adjunctive or sole use in seizure conditions.Vigabatrin has demonstrated efficacy in both CPS and ISpatient populations and represents a significant improvementin the therapeutic management of these conditions. The side-effect profile of vigabatrin has raised numerous concernsnecessitating the implementation of a REMS in the USA.
10. Expert opinion
The approval of vigabatrin in the USA should serve to providean alternative therapy to two groups of patients with seizuredisorders that in some cases have devastating consequences.
In the adult population, patients with CPS often findthemselves on multidrug treatment regimens without achiev-ing therapeutic success. Through decades of data collection,vigabatrin has been shown to be a viable addition to theregimens of those patients who have failed alternative thera-pies, often resulting in decreases in seizure frequency of 50%or more. However, the drug’s side-effect profile remains aconcern, particularly in the adult patient. As such, it is unlikelythat vigabatrin will find a place in therapy other than for use inthe most refractory patients.
In the case of IS, vigabatrin is likely to play a moresubstantial role, particularly in infants who have tuberoussclerosis as the underlying cause of their spasms. Despiteconcerns about side effects, many clinicians with expertisein treating pediatric epilepsies consider vigabatrin an appro-priate choice for first-line therapy in the face of IS. In addition,many of the agents historically used in the treatment of IS,such as systemic corticosteroids, are not without their ownrisks and consequences with long-term use.
In most cases, the side-effect profile of vigabatrin is notunlike that of other antiepileptic agents. Among adults, themost commonly experienced adverse events affect the CNS,
and include drowsiness, dizziness, fatigue and ataxia. Ininfants, insomnia and irritability occur with frequency, andpsychomotor agitation, hyperexcitability and axial hypertoniahave been noted. The psychiatric effects that have beendocumented in vigabatrin patients are more difficult to quantify.There is insufficient evidence in most cases to gauge whethervigabatrin use is the reason for the emergence of psychiatricsymptoms, which have included aggressive behavior, altera-tions in mood (including emergence of major depression),mania and, in extreme cases, suicidality. There seems to be norelationship to dose or duration of drug titration, and patientswith pre-existing psychiatric disorders seem to be no moresusceptible to symptom exacerbation. In addition, seizurecontrol has been correlated with the emergence of psychiatricsymptoms. The antiepileptic drugs as a group have beenassociated with psychiatric disturbances, and there is noevidence at present that symptoms are more frequent withvigabatrin as head-to-head trials have not been done. Cautionand monitoring for adverse psychiatric events are warrantedany time an antiepileptic agent is initiated.
More concerning is the discovery of visual field defectsassociated with vigabatrin use. Visual changes are apparentlyirreversible and because these events occur with relativefrequency, there was a substantial delay in the approval ofthe drug in the USA. There have been no specific patientcharacteristics identified so far to indicate which individualsmight be more or less susceptible to development of thedefects. These events have not been documented in any patientearlier than a minimum of 9 months of exposure to vigabatrintherapy. Because infants experiencing IS typically experiencedevelopmental delays if the spasms are allowed to continue,and because changes in vision are a frequent occurrence withthe spasms themselves, clinicians are likely to be less appre-hensive about early prescribing of vigabatrin in these patients.The approach in adults is likely to be substantially moreconservative, however, with virtually all drugs available for thetreatment of CPS having been used and determined to besubstandard with regard to seizure control before the initiationof vigabatrin therapy. Initiation of treatment in both adultsand infants should be undertaken with caution, and should anadequate response not be noted before 12 weeks of therapy,the drug should be discontinued.
The REMS that has been implemented for vigabatrinpatients should help to prevent unchecked vision loss withquarterly mandated ophthalmologic exams and reporting tothe SHARE program. Although regular vision testing ismandated (with allowable exceptions for blindness andother medical reasons), the clinical decisions regarding themaintenance of vigabatrin therapy reside with the prescriberand rely on recurrent monitoring and communicationbetween healthcare professionals. There is no informationavailable detailing the amount of leeway or flexibility thatexists with regard to late reporting. In addition, the REMShas no provision for allowing hospital or other institutionalpharmacy access to the medication for patients admitted with
Tolman & Faulkner
Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18) 3085
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
acute medical conditions. This may cause a delay in treat-ment or prevent medication continuation depending on theindividual policies of the institution. It is also concerningthat the FDA has disallowed community pharmacies theability to carry and dispense the medication. The use of fourspecialty pharmacies under the structure of the REMSassures that patients on multiple medications will be acquir-ing them from different pharmacies making the monitoringof a patient’s entire medication profile impossible unless thepatient transfers all of their prescriptions to the mail-orderpharmacy chosen by the SHARE program for vigabatrindispensing. The inclusion of trained and registered com-munity or institutional pharmacists with knowledge of apatient’s entire medication history would be logical, moreconvenient for the prescriber and arguably safer as thepatient could discuss medication-related concerns with ahealth care professional familiar with their medical historyand concurrent therapies. The use of trained pharmacists ina specialized dispensing model has been employed before(e.g., monitoring of the white blood cell and absolute
neutrophil counts in patients using the antipsychotic clozapine)and proven to be safe and successful.
In conclusion, vigabatrin is slated to be an important newaddition to the antiepileptic drug arsenal available to patientsin the USA. With appropriate monitoring, the benefit ofcontrolling refractory CPS and IS in previously uncontrolledpatients is likely to outweigh associated risks.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank BS Henriksen for assistance with theMolecular Operating Environment 2009 (MOE) softwarepackage (Chemical Computing Group, Inc., Montreal,Canada) and the creation of chemical structures andGABA-T images.
Declaration of interest
The authors state no conflict of interest and have received nopayment in preparation of this manuscript.
Bibliography1. Walsh S. Sabril approved by FDA to treat
spasms in infants and epileptic seizures.
2009. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/
NewsEvents/Newsroom/
PressAnnouncements/ucm179855.htm
[Last accessed 25 August 2009]
2. Gidal BE, Garnett WR. Epilepsy.
In: DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC,
et al., editors, Pharmacotherapy: a
pathophysiological approach. 6th edition.
Chicago, IL: McGraw–Hill; 2005. pp.
1023-1048
3. Murro AM. Complex partial seizures.
2006. Available from: www.emedicine.
com/neuro/topic74.htm
[Last accessed 24 July 2009]
4. Wheless JW, Ramsay RE, Collins SD.
Vigabatrin. Neurother 2007;4:163-72
5. Hemming K, Maguire MJ, Hutton JL,
Marson AG. Vigabatrin for refractory
partial epilepsy. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2008;3:CD007302
6. Gaily E, Liukkonen E, Paetau R, et al.
Infantile spasms: diagnosis and assessment
of treatment response by video-EEG.
Dev Med Child Neurol 2001;43:658-67
7. Parisi P, Bombardieri R, Curatolo P.
Current role of vigabatrin in infantile
spasms. Eur J Paediatr Neurol
2007;11:331-6
8. MackayMT,Weiss SK, Adams-Webber T,
et al. Practice parameter: medical
treatment of infantile spasms. Report of
the American academy of neurology and
the child neurology society. Neurology
2004;62:1668-81
9. Chiron C, Dumas C, Jambaque I, et al.
Randomized trial comparing vigabatrin
and hydrocortisone in infantile spasms due
to tuberous sclerosis. Epilepsy Res
1997;26:389-95
10. Hancock EC, Osborne JP, Edwards SW.
Treatment of infantile spasms.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2008;4:CD001770
11. Lippert B, Metcalf BW, Jung MJ,
Casara P. 4-Amino-hex-5-enoic acid, a
selective catalytic inhibitor of
4-aminobutyric-acid aminotransferase in
mammalian brain. Eur J Biochem
1977;74:441-5
12. Schechter PJ, Tranier Y. The
pharmacology of enzyme-activated
inhibitors of GABA-transaminase.
Enzyme-act irreversible inhibitors.
Proc Int Symp 1978:149-62
13. NDAs 20-427 & 22-006: Sabril
Advisory Committee Backgrounder. 2008.
Available from: http://www.fda.gov/
AdvisoryCommittees/
CommitteesMeetingMaterials/
Drugs/PeripheralandCentralNervous
SystemDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/
ucm153750.htm
[Last accessed 24 July 2009]
14. Young SB. Sabril� now available
in US for patients with two
difficult-to-treat epilepsies. 2009. Available
from: http://www.lundbeckinc.com/USA/
media/press-releases/2009/
09_Sept21_SabrilLaunch.asp
[Last accessed 25 September 2009]
15. Ovation Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Sabril
(vigabatrin) Advisory Committee briefing
document. Peripheral and Central Nervous
System Advisory Committee, 2008:197
16. Ngo D-KH, Goldstein LB. Summary
Minutes of the Peripheral and Central
Nervous System Drugs Advisory
Committee Meeting, 7 January 2009.
Peripheral and Central Nervous System
Drugs Advisory Committee. Rockville,
MD: US Food and Drug
Administration, 2009
17. Ngo D-KH, Goldstein LB. Summary
Minutes of the Peripheral and Central
Nervous System Drugs Advisory
Committee Meeting 8 January 2009.
Peripheral and Central Nervous System
Drugs Advisory Committee.
Rockville, MD: US Food and Drug
Administration, 2009
18. Lundbeck, Inc. Lundbeck’s acquisition of
Ovation Pharmaceuticals cleared by US
Federal Trade Commission. 2009.
Available from: http://www.lundbeckinc.
com/USA/media/press-releases/2009/
09_March16_FTCclose.asp
[Last accessed 29July 2009]
Vigabatrin
3086 Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18)
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
19. Grant SM, Heel RC. Vigabatrin:
a review of its pharmacodynamic and
pharmacokinetic properties, and
therapeutic potential in epilepsy and
disorders of motor control. Drugs
1991;41:889-926
20. Gidal BE, Privitera MD, Sheth RD,
Gilman JT. Vigabatrin: a novel therapy for
seizure disorders. Ann Pharmacother
1999;33:1277-86
21. Mumford J, Dulac O. Vigabatrin: a new
antiepileptic medication. J Child Neurol
1991;6(Suppl 2):S3-6
22. Willmore LJ, Abelson MB,
Ben-Menachem E, et al. Vigabatrin:
2008 update. Epilepsia 2009;50:163-73
23. Rey E, Pons G, Olive G. Vigabatrin.
Clinical pharmacokinetics.
Clin Pharmacokinet 1992;23:267-78
24. Shields WD, Sankar R. Vigabatrin.
Semin Pediatr Neurol 1997;4:43-50
25. Schechter PJ. Vigabatrin.
Curr Probl Epilepsy 1986;4:265-75
26. Sankar R, Derdiarian AT. Vigabatrin.
CNS Drug Rev 1998;4:260-74
27. Reynolds EH. Vigabatrin. BMJ
1990;300:277-8
28. Mumford JP, Lewis PJ. Vigabatrin.
Epilepsy Res Suppl 1991;3:161-8
29. Mumford JP, Cannon DJ. Vigabatrin.
Epilepsia 1994;35:(Suppl 5):S25-8
30. Lewis H, Wallace SJ. Vigabatrin.
Developmental medicine and
child neurology 2001;43:833-5
31. French JA. Vigabatrin. Epilepsia
1999;40:(Suppl 5):S11-16
32. Connelly JF. Vigabatrin.
Ann Pharmacother 1993;27:197-204
33. Calli J, Farrington E. Vigabatrin.
Pediatr Nurs 1998;24:357-61
34. Ben-Menachem E. Vigabatrin.
Handb Exp Pharmacol
1999;138:375-94
35. Ben-Menachem E. Vigabatrin. Epilepsia
1995;36:(Suppl 2):S95-104
36. Vigabatrin. Lancet 1989;1:532-3
37. Sabers A, Gram L. Pharmacology of
vigabatrin. Pharmacol Toxicol
1992;70:237-43
38. Patsalos PN, Duncan JS. The
pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of
vigabatrin. Rev Contemp Pharmacother
1995;6:447-56
39. Richens A. Pharmacology and clinical
pharmacology of vigabatrin.
J Child Neurol 1991;6(Suppl 2):S7-10
40. Monaco F. Cognitive effects of vigabatrin:
a review. Neurology
1996;47:(Suppl 1):S6-11
41. Schechter PJ. Clinical pharmacology
of vigabatrin. Br J Clin Pharmacol
1989;27:(Suppl 1):19-22S
42. Yogeeswari P, Sriram D,
Vaigundaragavendran J. The GABA shunt:
an attractive and potential therapeutic
target in the treatment of epileptic
disorders. Curr Drug Metab
2005;6:127-39
43. Jakobs C, Jaeken J, Gibson KM. Inherited
disorders of GABA metabolism. J Inherit
Metab Dis 1993;16:704-15
44. Meldrum BS. GABAergic mechanisms
in the pathogenesis and treatment of
epilepsy. Br J Clin Pharmacol
1989;27:(Suppl 1):3-11S
45. Gale K. GABA and epilepsy: basic
concepts from preclinical research.
Epilepsia 1992;33:(Suppl 5):S3-12
46. Tillakaratne NJK, Medina-Kauwe L,
Gibson KM. Gamma-aminobutyric acid
(GABA) metabolism in mammalian
neural and non-neural tissues.
Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol
1995;112A:247-63
47. Czuczwar SJ, Patsalos PN. The new
generation of GABA enhancers: potential
in the treatment of epilepsy. CNS Drugs
2001;15:339-50
48. Treiman DM. GABAergic
mechanisms in epilepsy. Epilepsia
2001;42:(Suppl 3):8-12
49. Sarup A, Larsson OM, Schousboe A.
GABA transporters and
GABA-transaminase as drug targets.
Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord
2003;2:269-77
50. Madsen KK, Larsson OM, Schousboe A.
Regulation of excitation by GABA
neurotransmission: focus on metabolism
and transport. Results Probl Cell Differ
2008;44:201-21
51. Landmark CJ. Targets for antiepileptic
drugs in the synapse. Med Sci Monit
2007;13:RA1-7
52. Draguhn A, Axmacher N, Kolbaev S.
Presynaptic lonotropic GABA receptors.
Results Probl Cell Differ
2008;44:69-85
53. Richerson GB. Looking for GABA in all
the wrong places: the relevance of
extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors to
epilepsy. Epilepsy Curr
2004;4:239-42
54. Sheean G, Schramm T, Anderson DS,
Eadie MJ. Vigabatrin–plasma enantiomer
concentrations and clinical effects.
Clin Exp Neurol 1992;29:107-16
55. Riekkinen PJ, Ylinen A, Halonen T,
et al. Cerebrospinal fluid GABA and
seizure control with vigabatrin.
Br J Clin Pharmacol
1989;27:(Suppl 1):87-94S
56. Henczi M, Nagy J, Weaver DF.
Determination of octanol-water partition
coefficients by an HPLC method for
anticonvulsant structure-activity studies.
J Pharm Pharmacol 1995;47:345-7
57. Petroff OA, Rothman DL. Measuring
human brain GABA in vivo: effects of
GABA-transaminase inhibition with
vigabatrin. Mol Neurobiol
1998;16:97-121
58. Pow DV, Baldridge W, Crook DK.
Activity-dependent transport of GABA
analogs into specific cell types
demonstrated at high resolution using a
novel immunocytochemical strategy.
Neuroscience 1996;73:1129-43
59. Espie P, Whomsley R, Benedetti MS, et al.
Antiepileptic drugs as substrates, inhibitors
and inducers of the multidrug
resistance-associated proteins (MRPs):
implications for endo- and xenobiotic
interactions. New Res Epilepsy Behav
2007:33-55
60. Jacqz-Aigrain E, Guillonneau M, Rey E,
et al. Pharmacokinetics of the S(+) and R(-)
enantiomers of vigabatrin during chronic
dosing in a patient with renal failure.
Br J Clin Pharmacol 1997;44:183-5
61. Storici P, De Biase D, Bossa F, et al.
Structures of I3-aminobutyric acid
(GABA) aminotransferase, a pyridoxal
5¢-phosphate, and [2Fe-2S]
cluster-containing enzyme, complexed
with I3-ethynyl-GABA and with the
antiepilepsy drug vigabatrin. J Biol Chem
2004;279:363-73
62. Valdizan EM, Armijo JA. Effects of single
and multiple increasing doses of vigabatrin
on brain GABA metabolism and
correlation with vigabatrin plasma
concentration. Biochem Pharmacol
1992;43:2143-50
Tolman & Faulkner
Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18) 3087
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
63. Ben-Menachem E, Persson LI, Mumford J,
et al. Effect of long-term vigabatrin therapy
on selected neurotransmitter
concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid.
J Child Neurol 1991;6(Suppl 2):S11-6
64. Ben-Menachem E, Persson LI,
Schechter PJ, et al. The effect of different
vigabatrin treatment regimens on CSF
biochemistry and seizure control in
epileptic patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol
1989;27:(Suppl 1):79-85S
65. Frisk-Holmberg M, Kerth P, Meyer P.
Effect of food on the absorption of
vigabatrin. Br J Clin Pharmacol
1989;27:(Suppl 1):23-5S
66. Hoke JF, Yuh L, Antony KK, et al.
Pharmacokinetics of vigabatrin following
single and multiple oral doses in normal
volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol
1993;33:458-62
67. Durham SL, Hoke JF, Chen TM.
Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of
vigabatrin following a single oral dose of
[14C]vigabatrin in healthy male
volunteers. Drug Metab Dispos
1993;21:480-4
68. Haegele KD, Schechter PJ. Kinetics
of the enantiomers of vigabatrin after an
oral dose of the racemate or the active
S-enantiomer. Clin Pharmacol Ther
1986;40:581-6
69. Rey E, Pons G, Richard MO, et al.
Pharmacokinetics of the individual
enantiomers of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl
GABA) in epileptic children.
Br J Clin Pharmacol 1990;30:253-7
70. Bialer M. Comparative pharmacokinetics
of the newer antiepileptic drugs.
Clin Pharmacokinet 1993;24:441-52
71. Perucca E. Pharmacokinetic variability of
new antiepileptic drugs at different ages.
Ther Drug Monit 2005;27:714-17
72. Bourgeois BF. Important pharmacokinetic
properties of antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia
1995;36:(Suppl 5):S1-7
73. Haegele KD, Huebert ND, Ebel M, et al.
Pharmacokinetics of vigabatrin:
implications of creatinine clearance.
Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988;44:558-65
74. Yu DK, Hutcheson SJ, Wei G, et al. A
comparison of population and standard
two-stage pharmacokinetic analyses of
vigabatrin data. Biopharm Drug Dispos
1994;15:473-84
75. Lacerda G, Krummel T, Sabourdy C, et al.
Optimizing therapy of seizures in patients
with renal or hepatic dysfunction.
Neurology 2006;67:(Suppl 4):S28-33
76. Tong X, Ratnaraj N, Patsalos PN. The
pharmacokinetics of vigabatrin in rat blood
and cerebrospinal fluid. Seizure
2007;16:43-9
77. Sanchez-Alcaraz A, Quintana MB,
Lopez E, et al. Effect of vigabatrin on the
pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine. J Clin
Pharm Ther 2002;27:427-30
78. Browne TR, Mattson RH, Penry JK, et al.
Vigabatrin for refractory complex partial
seizures: multicenter single-blind study
with long-term follow-up. Neurology
1987;37:184-9
79. Tartara A, Manni R, Galimberti CA, et al.
Vigabatrin in the treatment of epilepsy: a
long-term follow-up study. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:467-71
80. Loscher W, Schmidt D. Experimental and
clinical evidence for loss of effect
(tolerance) during prolonged treatment
with antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia
2006;47:1253-84
81. Browne TR, Mattson RH, Penry JK,
et al. A multicentre study of vigabatrin
for drug-resistant epilepsy.
Br J Clin Pharmacol
1989;27:(Suppl 1):95-100S
82. Remy C, Beaumont D. Efficacy and safety
of vigabatrin in the long-term treatment of
refractory epilepsy. Br J Clin Pharmacol
1989;27:(Suppl 1):125-9S
83. Petroff OA, Rothman DL, Behar KL,
Mattson RH. Human brain GABA levels
rise after initiation of vigabatrin therapy
but fail to rise further with increasing dose.
Neurology 1996;46:1459-63
84. French JA, Mosier M, Walker S, et al.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study
of vigabatrin three g/day in patients
with uncontrolled complex partial
seizures. Vigabatrin Protocol 024
Investigative Cohort. Neurology
1996;46:54-61
85. Dean C, Mosier M, Penry K.
Dose-response study of vigabatrin as
add-on therapy in patients with
uncontrolled complex partial seizures.
Epilepsia 1999;40:74-82
86. Mumford JP, Dam M. Meta-analysis
of European placebo controlled studies
of vigabatrin in drug resistant epilepsy.
Br J Clin Pharmacol
1989;27:(Suppl 1):101-7S
87. Appleton RE, Peters ACB, Mumford JP,
Shaw DE. Randomized,
placebo-controlled study of vigabatrin as
first-line treatment of infantile spasms.
Epilepsia 1999;40:1627-33
88. Elterman RD, Shields WD, Mansfield KA,
et al. Randomized trial of vigabatrin in
patients with infantile spasms. Neurology
2001;57:1416-21
89. Hancock E, Osborne J, Milner P.
Treatment of infantile spasms.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2003;3:CD001770
90. Jackson GD, Grunewald RA, Connelly A,
Duncan JS. Quantitative MR relaxometry
study of effects of vigabatrin on the brains
of patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res
1994;18:127-37
91. Cohen JA, Fisher RS, Brigell MG, et al.
The potential for vigabatrin-induced
intramyelinic edema in humans. Epilepsia
2000;41:148-57
92. Pearl PL, Vezina LG, Saneto RP, et al.
Cerebral MRI abnormalities associated
with vigabatrin therapy. Epilepsia
2009;50:184-94
93. Kalviainen R, Nousiainen I. Visual field
defects with vigabatrin: epidemiology and
therapeutic implications. CNS Drugs
2001;15:217-30
94. Trimble MR. The psychosis of epilepsy.
New York: Raven Press; 1991
95. Levinson DF, Devinsky O. Psychiatric
adverse events during vigabatrin therapy.
Neurology 1999;53:1503-11
96. Ferrie CD, Robinson RO,
Panayiotopoulos CP. Psychotic and severe
behavioral reactions with vigabatrin: a
review. Acta Neurol Scand
1996;93:1-8
97. Thomas L, Trimble M. Schmitz B,
Ring H. Vigabatrin and behavior
disorders: A retrospective survey.
Epilepsy Res 1996;25(1):21-7
98. Wong ICK. Retrospective study of
vigabatrin and psychiatric behavioral
disturbances. Epilepsy Res
1995;21:227-30
99. Lundbeck, Inc. Support, help and
resources for epilepsy: a comprehensive
resource for healthcare professionals and
their patients with severe or
uncontrolled epilepsies. 2009. Available
Vigabatrin
3088 Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18)
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.
from: http://www.lundbeckshare.com/
Default.aspx
[Last accessed 15 October 2009]
100. Storici P, Capitani G, De Biase D,
et al. Crystal structure of
GABA-aminotransferase, a target for
antiepileptic drug therapy. Biochemistry
1999;38:8628-34
101. Storici P, Capitani G, De Biase D, et al.
4-aminobutyrate-aminotransferase from
pig. 1999. Available from: http://www.
rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?
structureId=1OHV [Last accessed
28 July 2009]
102. Storici P, De Biase D, Bossa F, et al.
4-aminobutyrate-aminotransferase
inactivated by gamma-vinyl GABA. 2004.
Available from: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/
explore/explore.do?structureId=1OHW
[Last accessed 27 July 2009]
AffiliationJustin A Tolman† PharmD PhD &
Michele A Faulkner PharmD†Author for correspondence
Creighton University School of Pharmacy and
Health Professions,
2500 California Plaza,
Omaha, NE 68178, USA
Tel: +1 402 280 2915; Fax: +1 402 280 1883;
E-mail: [email protected]
Tolman & Faulkner
Expert Opin. Pharmacother. (2009) 10(18) 3089
Exp
ert O
pin.
Pha
rmac
othe
r. D
ownl
oade
d fr
om in
form
ahea
lthca
re.c
om b
y U
nive
rsity
of
Uls
ter
at J
orda
nsto
wn
on 1
2/04
/14
For
pers
onal
use
onl
y.