vietnam_community driven upgrading process

8/3/2019 Vietnam_Community Driven Upgrading Process

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vietnamcommunity-driven-upgrading-process 1/17

NATIONAL CDF NETWORK

IN VIETNAM



O VERVIEW OF VIETNAM CDF NETWORK

Start in 2009 with 8

member cities. Now 30

1st year: 5 cities with 25

small and 2 housing

projects 2nd year: more 6 cities

with 30 small and 4

housing projects

Beyond: 15 small and 6

housing projects withrevolving CDF fund

3 cities with post

disaster rehabilitation

projects



SOME PICTURES OF SMALL PROJECTS



SMALL PROJECTS:

ANALYSIS BY FUNDING SOURCES

Total cost by sources of primary funding Total

ACCA Revolving

CDF loan to

com-ty

Community Gov't Others

in USD 98,821 9,528 224,181 133,005 6,906 472,441

in % 19.81 2.02 47.45 28.15 1.46 100.00* Nearly 50% is contributed by communities

By the use of ACCA funding at community level Total

ACCA funding to

CDF

Revolving

CDF loan

to com-ty

Community

Gov't Others

Grant to

com-ty

1st round

loan tocom-ty

in USD 22,824 75.997 9,528 224,181 133,005 6,906 472,441

in % 4.83 16.09 2.02 47.45 28.15 1.46 100.00

* More than 65% is covered by communities, not including interest (0.8-1%) on

loan



HOUSING PROJECT IN VINH CITY ² A BREAKTHROUGH



COMMUNITY-DRIVEN HOUSING: W HAT MAKES IT

DIFFERENT ? (C ASE STUDIES IN V INH CITY)

Coventional Community- Driven

Average area per family BEFORE/ AFTERproject (m2)

28 /89.3

30 (min 14- max 96) /

47.3

1. Number of relocated households, of which: 45/114 (40%) none

- received new land plots (outside community) 11 ( 10%)

-O

nly cash compensation34

( 3

0%)

2.Number of families received new plots onexisitng site, in which

69/114 (60%) 29/29 (100%)

- N°. F amilies used land to construct new houses 46 ( 67 %) 29 ( 100%)

-N°. F amilies sold out their land 2 3 ( 33%) none

3. N°. families constructed new houses 42 (61%) 28 (97%)

4. N°. families cannot construct new houses(not affordable)

27 (39%) 1 (3%)

5. Infastructure construction costs per house 1166 US$ 303 US$

6. Housing cost per m2 ( two±floor house) 140 US$/ m2 77 US$/m2



BETTER CITY PLANNING

DECENT HOUSE AND BETTER LIFE FOR POOR COMMUNITIES

Coventional housing process Community- driven housing process

- Gov¶t urban planning standards:

larger road, larger land plot => more

eviction, higher compensation cost to

the gov¶t, bigger debt for poor families,more land plots sold out, µbroken¶

social/economic network

- Individual design and construction:

higher cost, longer construction time

- Flexible and affordable planning

standards: reblocking with smaller land

plots (but bigger than initial) => no

eviction, minimum to no compensationcost, community network maintained

- Collective design and construction:

cheaper construction cost (reuse of

materials, community labor, shorter time

TOGETHER BUILDING UP COMMUNITY!



FROM THE VIEW POINT OF A COMMUNITY

LEADER

1. On local government:

- Appreciation of community capacity => support

to community driven projects

2. On community:

- Confidence in themselves

- Increased social position and voice towards

government3. On the society:

- Change of attitude to and relationship with poor

community



HOUSING PROCESS IN H AI DNG CITY

12m2

25m2



HOUSING PROCESS IN H AI DNG CITY

City¶s approval for in situ

resettlement (from 18 to 36m2)



NETWORK EXTENSION INHUNG Y EN

Mapping of collective housings

Current status of a collective housing



HOUSING NETWORK EXTENSION IN T AM K Y

Existing layout

Reblocking layout

12.6m2

52m2



SOC TRANG ² HOUSING PROJECT

Total no. of hholds: 36.

Living od squaterred land on the river banks,having no land use right.

Pilot in securing land tenure forspontaneously formed resettlement site (dueto inaffordability to resettle in PPP standardsite) by giving incentives (change of land use)

to land owners to invest in infrastructure. Pilot in agreement with community on

affordable size of land lot for resttlement(36m2)



C A M AU ² HOUSING PROJECT

Total no. of hholds:40 h

Type of project: in situ resettlementin a nearby site, purchansed by thegovernment from private landowners.

Pilot in small affordable land sizefor resettlement.

Integration with WB funded UrbanUpgrading project



L ANG SON ² HOUSING PROJECT

Total No pf hholds: 40

Scaterredly located ethinicminority families

Having land use right (tenure)

Having tradition of mutual help inhousing construction

Reapir/newly build houses on theexisting land

ACCA loan is used for buyingconstruction materials



THANK YOU

FOR

YOUR A TTENTION

vietnam_community driven upgrading process

Documents