vhcures: multi-source analysis of the health care spend
TRANSCRIPT
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
VHCURES: Multi-Source Analysis of the Health Care
Spend
Amy Kinner, MS, Onpoint Health Data
1
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
All-Payer Claims Database Market
Existing Mandatory APCD (12)
Implementing Mandatory APCD (5)
Strong Interest in Developing APCD (21)
Existing APCD with Voluntary Submission (1)
Existing Voluntary APCD Effort (4)
No Current APCD Activity (7)
2
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
What Are All-Payer Claims Databases (APCDs)?
• APCDs integrate all claims from all payers • Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare• Pharmacy, Medical, Dental• Enable analyses of cost and health use and quality across all
insurers
3
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Vermont’s APCD
• The Vermont Health Care Uniform Reporting and Evaluation System (VHCURES)
• Data collection required by Vermont law• Medicare data provided by CMS• Onpoint-built value-adds required for Vermont Blueprint for
Health analyses (e.g., 3M Clinical Risk Groups, HealthPartners’ Total Cost of Care, etc.)
• Integrates Commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare data• De-identified data• Members tracked through time by unique member_id
4
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Vermont’s APCD
Examples of Claims Data Collected• Diagnoses• Procedures• Prescriptions• Date of Service• Cost of service (paid by insurer and patient)• Place of Service• Provider• Patient Demographics
5
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Blueprint Clinical Registry
• Data collection at primary care practices in registries or EMRs• Demographic information on patients• Conditions• Variety of clinical measurements• Programmatic data (e.g., Community Health Team work)• Integrated in a central repository
6
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Blueprint Clinical Registry
Examples of Patient Data Collected• Body Mass Index (BMI)• Weight• LDL• HDL• Tobacco Use• Hemoglobin A1c• Blood pressure• Vaccinations• Date of visit• Participation in health improvement programs
7
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Intensive Work to to Improve the Clinical Registry
• The VT Blueprint and Capitol Health work intensely with practices in “sprints” to improve data quality and reporting
• Develop team• Assess data elements being captured at the site• Help site map elements to registry data structure• Continuously improve data submission processes and quality of
data
8
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Linking Clinical Registries with APCDs
Clinical Registry
Participation in health improvement programs
Data specific to care received in primary care settings
APCD
Primary care measurements (e.g., blood pressure readings)
Care across settings
Cost of care
Diagnoses
Prescriptions
Procedures
9
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
The Value Equation of Data Linkage
Clinical Data All-Payer Claims Data
Enhanced Analytics
10
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
How to Link Clinical & Claims Data
Use Identical Hashing Methods Across
Databases
Use Common Patient Identifiers to Link…
First Name
Last Name
DOB
ZIP Code
Gender
11
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
FY15 Data Linkage Results
83% of Vermont Blueprint patients with data in VHCURES have been linked to an identifier found in the clinical registry
48% of Vermont Blueprint patients with data in VHCURES had some data collected in the clinical registry during the most recent measurement year (FY15)
12
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Linking Claims & Clinical Data Sources
13
Patients Attributed to Medical Home Practices – Claims Data (358,117)
Linked to Clinical Registry ID (296,961) Unlinked (61,156)
Measures in FY 2015 (171,134) No Measures (125,827)
Measure # of Patients with DataWeight 153,374Blood pressure 151,478BMI 131,603Triglycerides 43,086LDL-C 40,675Tobacco use 27,493HbA1c 23,059
Examples of Patient Volume for Key Measures
NOTE: Counts represent dates of services on and between 7/1/2015 and 6/30/2015
13
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Practice and Regional-Level Profiles
Publicly available Vermont Blueprint HSA Profiles
blueprintforhealth.vermont.gov/node/680
14
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Hypertension, Blood Pressure in Control
Proportion, including 95%-confidence intervals, of continuously enrolled members with hypertension, ages 18–85 years, whose last recorded blood pressure measurement in the clinical database was in control (<140/90 mmHg); the blue dashed line indicates the statewide average
15
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Diabetes HbA1C Control & Outcomes
Metric HbA1c in Control * HbA1c Not in Control *
Members 4,220 568
Average annual expenditures per capita
$12,507 ($12,059, $12,954)
$15,267 ($13,867, $16,667)
Inpatient hospitalizations per 1,000 members
181.7 (168.7, 194.7)
275.0 (231.1, 318.8)
Inpatient days per 1,000 members
877.8 (849.2, 906.4)
1,524.0 (1,421.8, 1,627.2)
Outpatient ED visits per 1,000 members
532.1 (509.8, 554.4)
725.2 (654.0, 796.4)
* Risk-adjusted rates and 95% confidence intervals; 99th percentile outliers excluded; HbA1c not in control >9%, in control ≤9%
16
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Data for Use in a Learning Health System
11
Measurement
Expenditures
Quality
Utilization
Patient Experience
Unit Costs
Variations & Associations
Social, Economic, Behavioral Outcomes
ProductsProfile Reporting
Program Evaluations
Predictive Modeling
Learning System Support
Peer-Reviewed Publications
Payment Performance Analytics
© Onpoint Health Data ∙ Confidential & proprietary information ∙ Not for redistribution
Clinical Registry
BRFSS Data
CAHPS Data
Corrections data
Other?
Provider Registry
Claims data from APCD
17
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Contact Information
Amy Kinner: [email protected], 207-430-0650
18
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
VHCURES: Multi-Source Analysis of the Health Care
Spend
Mary Kate Mohlman, PhD, MSVermont Blueprint for Health
Department of Vermont Health Access
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Vermont Blueprint for Health• Supports practice transformation to patient-centered medical
homes (PCMHs)• Supports multi-disciplinary community health teams integrate
with PCMHs to coordinate social and medical services• Transformation Network:
o Practice facilitators: work with practices on meeting NCQA standards and developing quality improvement initiatives
o Project managers: who work to implement program initiatives and engage community partners
o CHT leaders: coordinate CHT activities with PCMHs
• Use of statewide multi-payer claims and clinical data to evaluation overall health services performance and programmatic components, to support payment reforms, and to provide feedback for a Learning Health System
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Data Quality
• Outcomes/analysis only as good as the data used• Data Quality Projects
o Goal: to ensure accurate, timely, and reliable end-to-end data extraction, transmission, and registry reporting to support the delivery of high quality health services
o Team tailors work to needs of independent PCMHs or hospital/health systems
o Completion when lean clinician and project team representative verify continuity of data quality from source EMR to VHIE to clinical registry
• Increasing number of patients with clinical measures supports meaningful reporting, accurate comparative analysis, and more complete linked claims and clinical data
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
Percent of practices in service area with >80% of patients with clinical measures in the clinical registry
Jul 2013-Jun2014 Jan 2014-Dec 2014
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
264,554
301,209 305,051296,961
112,388
137,627
162,118 171,134
42.5%45.7%
53.1%
57.6%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
Calendar Year 2013 State Fiscal Year 2014 Calendar Year 2014 State Fiscal Year 2015
Growth in Linked Claims and Clinical Records Containing Clinical Measures
VCHURES IDs linked to Clinical Registry IDs Linked records containing clinical measures Percent Linked
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Conversation Starter
Prac
tice
Prof
ile
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Linked Data Use in Profiles
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Statewide Population Health Evaluations
• Value of whole populationo Large numbers – better able to identify statistically significant
associations Retrospective analysis Modeling for projected trends
o Comparative analytics Compare outcomes for PCMH-attributed patients to non-PCMH Compare outcomes for ACO covered lives versus non-ACO Better understanding how different payers are meeting the needs of
their specific populations Addressing variability in health services utilization and expenditures
across state regionso Evaluating statewide policies
Evaluating policy effectiveness Supporting decisions for future policies
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Statewide Population Health Evaluations
• Diabetes: reviewing link between HbA1c, common comorbidities, and near-term expenditures and utilization patterns
• Hypertension: reviewing links between hypertension diagnosis, blood pressure and cholesterol treatment, comorbidities, and expenditures and utilization patterns.
• Predictive Analytics: generating projections for policy recommendations under alternative payment models
• Linking with other Statewide datasets o Correctionso Meals on Wheels
Day 2: Track 3 – Measuring Care, Quality and Outcomes with Data
Discussion
• Questions? Comments?
• Contact informationMary Kate [email protected]