venice, april 2011 itis c. zuccante. in each meeting we discussed: teaching techniques teachers’...

36
Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante

Upload: clifford-thomas

Post on 03-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Venice, April 2011ITIS C. Zuccante

Page 2: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

In each meeting we discussed:

teaching techniques

teachers’ qualities

students’ achievement

What have we done?

Page 3: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

How?In each country students spoke about these three topics and evaluate some lessons using a grid created in the previous meetings.

This grid had been created to evaluate CLIL lessons: methods, habits, teachers’ qualities, students’ active participation.

Page 4: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

The grid

Page 5: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Teaching techniques Structured group work Discussion Debate Experiential learnig Technology involved: (PC, Blackboard, interactive whiteboard, projector and internet) Presentations made by students Brainstorming/ Mindmapping Clear objectives Variety Teacher-led lesson Role play CLIL

Page 6: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

With “teaching techniques” we mean the methods that teachers use to attract our attention and teach in the best way. Looking at the grid we can see that there are a lot of methods we can use. Students probably prefer fun activities, like working in groups, debate or technology : we would like to see the school as a second home, as a nice place with a lovely atmosphere.

Teaching techniques

Page 7: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Relative grid

Page 8: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Teaching techniquesBy comparing results we can see that in all countries discussion is the method most used by teachers. Maybe it could be a good system to teach and learn better, because students participate actively instead of the usual teacher-oriented lesson.

While the least frequently used methods are interactive whiteboard and role play. Maybe the first could be uncommon because not all the schools have this tool. Role play is not used because it depends on teachers.

Page 9: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

CLIL lessons are used especially in Poland, Frankfurt and Italy

Group work is frequently used in Frankfurt and in Lubeck, however in the other countries it’s

used less than there.

Brainstorming, clear objectives and teacher-led lessons, debate techniques are quite

commonly used in each country

Technology (PC, presentation/projector, internet, etc)is used especially in Italy and

Germany

Teaching techniques

Page 10: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Teaching techniques

Page 11: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Teachers’ qualities

Humour Motivation of students Relaxed environment Authority/respect Clear and understandable

Page 12: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

There are six billion people in the world, all with totally different features. It's very difficult to be in total agreement. At school it’s important to have a good atmosphere with teachers in order to learn better.

We prefer a strict  and friendly teacher, rather than a friendly teacher  without authority. We are guys and we need someone that helps us to grow in the best way. The school should also do this.

Teachers’ qualities

Page 13: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Relative grid

Page 14: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Looking at the grid, we see that in each country there is a high level of relaxed environment, clear and understandable lessons, authority and respect.

The last two are more diffused in Italy and Frankfurt and less in Poland, we don’t know why but we could think that it depends on the teachers.

Humour and motivation of students are quite high in all the countries. Probably it depends on the teachers but also on the students. It’s important to have a good atmosphere at school.

Teachers’ qualities

Page 15: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Teachers’ qualities

Page 16: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Students’ achievement

Paying attention Development of critical thinking Speaking to the whole group Completed the objectives Active participation Tolerance towards each other Learning from each other

Page 17: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

When a student is a good student? What is ‘achievement’?

We spoke about this: first of all, we are good students when we are good men and women; school and teachers have to do their part.

We have to learn and pay attention, speak with other people, complete the objectives and so on.

These are life skills that we will need for ever.

Students’ achievement

Page 18: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Relative grid

Page 19: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

This project aims at improving students’ participation and comprehension by using different methods. Looking at the grid we could say that after these meetings we have good results. For example: Paying attention, Development of critical thinking, Speaking to the whole group and Completed the objectives are quite diffused in all countries but in different ways.

While Active participation and Learning from each other are very common in each school, maybe we could attribute these results to CLIL lessons.

Students’ achievement

Page 20: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Students’ achievement

Page 21: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

IES “Fuentesaúco”

another point of view

Page 22: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

In the 4th meeting in Cracovia, students described our favourite learning method(s) and created a grid in order to analyse them.

Page 23: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

41 students have participated.

Aged between 15 and 18 years.

First of all, we passed the questionnaire after we made the charts and finally we have analyzed the results

This presentation have been divided into three main parts:

1.- TEACHING TECHNIQUES

2.- TEACHER´S QUALITIES

3.- STUDENTS´ACHIEVEMENT

Page 24: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

T1.Structured group workT2.DiscussionT3. DebateT4. Experimaental learnigT5. Technology involved: PC, Blackboard, interactived whiteboard,proyector and internetT6 Presentations made by studentsT7 Brainstorming/ MindmappingT8 Clear objetivesT9 VarietyT10 Role PlayT11 CLIL

Page 25: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Structured group word

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

DISCUSION

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

DEBATE

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

N/ A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

EXPERIMENTAL LEARNIG

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

TECNOLOGY INVOLVED:PC

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

Page 26: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

TECNOLGY INVOLVED:BLACKBOARD

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARD

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

PRESENTATION/ PROJ ECTOR

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

INTERNET

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

N/ A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

PRESENTATIONS MADE BY STUDENTS

0

10

20

30

40

50

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

Page 27: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

BRAINSTORMING/MINDMAPPING

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

N/ A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

CLEAR OBJ ETIVES

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

VARIETY

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

N/ A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

ROLE PLAY

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

N/ A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

CLIL

0

5

10

15

20

25

N/ A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

Page 28: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

What we like the most is the use of new technologies in the classroom: use of the computer, internet ...

CLIL activities have been funny, very interesting and different to what we are used to do.

In Spain it is not very common to do role playing, so the results have been very low.

Page 29: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Q1 Humour

Q2 Motivation of students

Q3 Relaxed enviroment

Q4 Authority/respect

Q5 Clear and understandable

Page 30: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Humour

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

Motivation of students

05

101520253035

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

Relaxed enviroment

0

10

20

30

40

50

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

Autority/respect

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

Clear and understandable

0

10

20

30

40

50

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

Page 31: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

We have observed that what students value most in a teacher is authority in the classroom and to instill respect on us.

We punctuate second the fact that the explanations are clear and understandable.

Finally, the motivation that leads the students is also very important.

Page 32: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

S1 Paying attention

S2 Development of critical thinking

S3 Speaking to the whole group

S4 Complete the objectives

S5 Active participation

S6 Tolerance towards each other

S7 Learning from each other

Page 33: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Tolerance towards each other

0

10

20

30

40

50

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

%

Learning from each other

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

Page 34: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

Paying attention

0

10

20

30

40

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

Development of critical thinking

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

N/ A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

Completed the objetives

0

10

20

30

40

50

N/A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

Active par ticipation

0

10

20

30

40

50

N/ A MIN LOW AVG HIGH MAX

Page 35: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

It draws our attention the fact that students demand more dynamic and participatory classes, although when passing the questionnaire it appears that the last thing we like is making our own presentations and we prefer the teacher to give the explanation.

English activities motivate an increase of student’s participation, critical thinking and teamwork.

Page 36: Venice, April 2011 ITIS C. Zuccante. In each meeting we discussed:  teaching techniques  teachers’ qualities  students’ achievement What have we done?

IES “Fuentesaúco”