vel pillay lrqa food safety program manager, … presentations/thurs...gfsi and fssc 22000: updates,...
TRANSCRIPT
GFSI and FSSC 22000:
Updates, trends and future plans Vel Pillay
LRQA Food Safety Program Manager, Americas
September 20, 2012
“Get to know” the Audience
• How many of you have Japanese Cars & appliances?
• How many of you are familiar with ISO systems?
• How many of you are 9001?
• How many of you have heard of GFSI?
• How many of you have heard or work with FSSC?
Food Safety schemes with Focus on
FSSC 22K
• Food Safety can only be achieved through collaboration from all sectors of the supply chain
• Food Safety is non competitive
• Harmonization is key to reducing the amount of audits
• Auditor competency is critical
Basic Premises
• Introduction - LRQA
• GFSI
• FSSC Foundation
• ISO 22000
• PAS documents
• Q&A
Agenda
Who is Lloyd Register?
• 250 year old Organization
• LRQA is part of the Lloyds Register Group
• Non Profit Organization
• Reinvest most of our revenue in making the world a better place
• Sponsor and subsidize educational projects around the world – Universities and educational institutions
• Champion and support community projects around the world – 42 Global projects in 2010
“ Life Matters”
LRQA is a member of the Lloyd’s Register Group
The Group at a glance…
• >100 offices delivering services in >100 countries
• Some 7,500 employees of 90 nationalities
• Celebrated our 250 year anniversary in 2010
• Four business divisions:
• Marine
• Transportation
• Energy
• Management Systems (LRQA Business Assurance)
• Anticipated annual turnover $1.0bn
How concerned are consumers about the safety of their food supply?
Consumer – Reality or perception
Source: Context Marketing, USA, Oct 2009
The Audit Landscape – Early days
BUYING COMPANIES
Company A
Company B
Company C
Company D
Company E
Food Safety Audit
Food Safety Audit
Food Safety Audit
Food Safety Audit
Food Safety Audit
SHARED SUPPLIER
BASE Supplier A
RESULT
Redundancy
Confusion
Inefficiency
High Cost
Solution Build Confidence in Third Party Certification & Reduce
Inefficiency in the Food System
“once certified, accepted by all”
Audit Landscape Evolution
• Audit proliferation in North America and Europe in early 2000s
• Example: Cargill’s St. Clair, MI Salt plant had 12 – 2nd and 3rd party & 17 customer audits in 2006
• IN 2011, after implementing FSSC 22000, St. Clair Salt plant had 1 – 3rd party audit (FSSC 22000) 12 customers accepted the FSSC audit.
• Wal-Mart changed the auditing world in NA with GFSI request
• Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) swung the pendulum even further; some audits no longer accepted by customers
• Many US plants had to move quickly: most common choices were BRC, SQF, IFS and Dutch HACCP (initially)
• Multi-nationals in the Americas shift to 3rd party audits
• GFSI is rapidly gaining traction globally
GFSI
• Started in 2000 & was European- retail centric
• Developed benchmarking & protocols
• Motto: “Once certified, accepted everywhere”
• Gives companies a choice of several options
• No longer European retail centric
• Has a process to take action on stakeholders suggestions; revise guidance documents, protocols & benchmarking audit schemes through Technical Working Groups
How the GFSI Works
Retailers Suppliers
Food Service
Certification
Bodies
Accreditation
Bodies
International
Organizations
Academia
Government
Scheme Owners
Service Providers
GFSI Mission and Objectives
Driving continuous improvement in food safety to strengthen
consumer confidence worldwide.
Reduce Food
Safety Risks
Develop
Competencies
and Capacity
Building
Manage Cost in
the Supply Chain
Knowledge
Exchange and
Networking
GFSI acceptance The following companies have now come to a common acceptance
of GFSI standards
10 Schemes recognized by GFSI
Scheme Scope
FSSC 22000 Food manufacturing
Dutch HACCP (B) Food manufacturing
IFS Food manufacturing
SQF 2000 level 2 Food manufacturing
BRC Food manufacturing
Synergy 22000 Food manufacturing
Global Red Meat standard Red meat manufacturing
GAA Seafood processing Seafood manufacturing
Global GAP Agriculture
SQF 1000 Agriculture
Primus GFS Agriculture and Food manufacturing
Canada GAP Agriculture
Food Safety System Certification 22000
About the Foundation
• Non profit organization
• Owns GFSI approved FSSC 22000 and HACCP food safety systems certification schemes
• Foundation facilitates the schemes
• Maintains the licence agreements with accredited Certification Bodies
• Incorporates: 11 associated Certification Bodies for HACCP, 69 associated Certification Bodies for FSSC 22000
• Independent FSSC Board of Stakeholders: responsible for scheme content and quality of audits
Board of Stakeholders
Independent Chairman Fons Schmid
FoodDrinkEurope Beate Kettlitz
International Margarine Association of the Countries of Europe Sander van Pelt
EMRA (European Modern Restaurant Association) Bizhan Pourkomailian
ICBW (International Council of Bottled Waters Associations) Marc Cwikowski
SSAFE (Safe Supply of Affordable Food Everywhere) Mark Overland
IFDA (International Food Distributors Association) Jorge Hernandez
IIOC (independent international organisation of CB’s) Stefano Crea
IQnet Martha Mikulaskova
BSI (British Standards Institute) Quincy Lissaur
Foundation for Food Safety Certification Cor Groenveld
Foundation for Food Safety Certification Cornelie Glerum
IAF (International Accreditation Forum) Skip Greenaway
ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Kevin McKinley
GMA The Association of Food, Beverage and Consumer Products Companies Leon Bruner
Mission FSSC 22000
“To be the globally leading, independent, non- profit, ISO-based
and GFSI- accepted food safety certification scheme for
the whole supply chain.”
Vision FSSC 22000
• Consolidation or even lower number of GFSI approved food safety certification schemes;
• Increased mutual recognition by large manufacturers, retailers and caterers;
• Increased public/private cooperation on consumer food safety protection through private certification;
• More need for independent, non profit food safety certification management;
• Extension of ISO- based food safety certification in the USA, China, S.E. Asia and Middle and South America.
GFSI Committed organizations
Number of certificates per August
FSSC 22000 sites worldwide1%
35%
7%1%21%
29%
4% 2%
Pacific
Europe
South America
Central America
North America
Asia
Africa
Russia
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2008
2009
2010
2011-1
2011-2
2011-3
2011-4
2012-01
2012-02
2012-03
2012-04
2012-05
2012-06
2012-07
5 49
301428
573
805
11371274
14061538
16711812
20182168
Numberofsites
Period
TotalamountFSSC22000foodsites
Status
• 69 associated CBs around the world
• 48 with full license
• 21 with provisional license, working on accreditation
• New database with certified organizations
• Extension with Packaging (PAS 223)
• 29 CBs with provisional license
• 75 certificates
• 7 licensed training organizations
Integrity Program
• Independent expert
• Desk review audits
• Risk based CB office audits and witnessed on site audits
• KPI’s
• Sanctions
Objectives 2012-2013
• Meeting 6th version GFSI guidance document
• Intensified communication
• Maintaining Integrity Program
• Training Licences
• Global harmonization day for all CBs
• Global representation (seminars, events ,etc) and communication
• Establishing regional represence
• Seek cooperation with authorities
• Possible extension scheme to other food supply chain sectors
What is FSSC 22000 scheme
ISO 22000 Standard ISO 22000 Standard
PAS 220
PAS 223
+
+
=
=
ISO 22000
ISO 22000 Standard
ISO 22000 : 2005
• International, independent standard
• Generic food safety standard for the whole food supply chain
• Developed by HACCP experts representing stakeholders
• State of the art, best practices
• Focus on supply chain assurance
• Management System principles embedded
• Aligned with Codex Alimentarius
• ISO 22000 family of standards
• Is a process based audit
Requirements
Satisfaction
Management
Resources
Measure,
analyze and
Improve
Implementation of FSMS
Uodates and
Product Realisation
Management
Engagements
Guided by FSMS
Entrée Sortie
Safe
Product
Customers
Legislation
Science
Research
General
Production
Competency
RECIPIENTS
Product
characteristics =
Satisfied
Customer
Process based Model of ISO 9001 extended to FSMS
Principle of ISO 22000
-requirements
-materials
-processes
-products
-PRP’s
Risk
analysis operational
PRP´s
Control
measures
Hazard
identification
HACCP plan
CCP´s
Validation
Verification
Modification
Implementation
An integrated management system.
Management
PAS Documents – to date
34
REVIEW PANEL:
Open for comments from industry peer groups
PAS 222
Industry Steering Group
35
REVIEW PANEL:
Open for comments from industry peer groups
Industry Steering Group
36
REVIEW PANEL:
Over 100 organisations contacted, 67 reviewed, 144 comments received
The Future…
• Short Term…
• ISO strategy paper for SSAFE
• Extension to scope for FSSC 22000
• Gain full GFSI benchmarking approval
Medium Term…
• Submit into ISO as a seed document
• Maintain the PAS (review and/or revise where necessary)
Long Term…
• Withdraw PAS once an ISO is published
37
Future trends
• Create more PAS documents for specific sector. The industry is currently
working on a PAS for the retail industry and one for storage and distribution
• FSSC Foundation to include other sectors in their Scope.
• FSSC Foundation to increase regional presence
• GFSI to continue creating visibility and credibility globally
• GFSI currently working on Auditor competency
• Use of GFSI Capacity Building Program – Basic and Intermediate
Important Considerations
Implementing a scheme
• Know your customer’s expectations
• Investigate the audit schemes to determine which one is best for your company’s culture; start with www.mygfsi.com
• Benchmark with other companies who have already deployed
• Get upper management commitment
• Deploy a change management strategy
• Determine your criteria for your choice of a CB (ie. number & qualifications of auditors, audit timeliness, cost, reputation, training expectations, etc.)
• Investigate the merits of several CBs & decide who you will use;
• Design your training & deployment strategy with your CB
How to ensure integrity of audits?
Most critical factors:
• Education, experience and skills of auditor
• Initial qualification and training process of Certification Body
• Qualification per scheme and sector
• Sufficient time for the audit
• Reviews and monitoring of the auditor
• Continuous development of the auditor
Expectation of CB from the organization being audited
• Proof of a robust, risk-based management system
• A process-based management system approach, not just an inspection
• Skilled, experienced auditors understanding your business / processes
• Audits and results shall be tied to your business
• Vendor assurance capabilities
• Solid internal and corporate audit programs
• Improving performance, reducing risk
Thank you for your attention!
And always manage
your risks . . .
Services are provided by LRQA and other members of the Lloyd’s
Register Group. For further information visit www.lr.org/entities
For more information, please contact:
Vel Pillay LRQA Food Safety Program Manager, Americas
1330 Enclave Pkwy., Suite 200
Houston, TX 77077
www.lrqausa.com
• Our findings:
• Insufficient transparency across supply chain
• Lack of cooperation
• Geographical positions links
• Insufficient depth in hazard-risk analysis
• Insufficient harmonization legislation / standards
• Control hazards / risks not at the right place
• Insufficient control suppliers
• Validation / management of changes.
Why do problems persist in Food Supply Chains?
• Focused on risk areas
• Clear technique for analysis
• Transparency throughout the whole chain
• Control of hazards at the right place
• Trust within the chain
• Harmonization of schemes/approvals
• Embedded continual improvement programs
Preventing failures and customer satisfaction
= Reduction of costs
= Increasing confidence of clients / consumers
= Protection of brand / image
Managing the supply chain
Summary – Facts about Management System based
assessment
• Plants must “think and justify”
• Intensive audit in Year 1 to determine whether an effective system is in place and whether it is functional
• Is a “system” audit vs. a “checklist” audit
• It is an in-depth evaluation of the systems
• Independent ownership
• Syncs well with other ISO standards
• Same audit and “language” across the world