variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

59
Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic interpretation Gregor Duval*, Steven Bowman, Roger Taylor, Yves Lafet, Adrian Smith and Henning Hoeber

Upload: lamdien

Post on 02-Jan-2017

222 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic interpretation

Gregor Duval*, Steven Bowman, Roger Taylor, Yves Lafet,

Adrian Smith and Henning Hoeber

Page 2: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Content

Introduction: why does the seismic interpreter need

broadband data?

Benefits for interpretation of a wide range of geological

settings:

– Tertiary silici-clastic reservoirs

– Chalk section

– Deep sub-BCU targets

Page 3: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Why does the seismic interpreter

need broadband data?

Page 4: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Effects and benefits of increasing the bandwidth

Increasing high frequencies

10-20Hz 10-25Hz 10-30Hz 10-35Hz

2-20Hz 5-20Hz 10-20Hz

Large side-lobes and

broad central peak Sharper

central peak

Increase low frequencies

Reduced

side-lobes

Page 5: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Effects and benefits of increasing the bandwidth

Conventional

BroadSeis

1000 m

20 m

BroadSeis Conventional

Courtesy of Total, Cobalt and the Republic of Gabon

Page 6: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Effects and benefits of increasing the bandwidth

Courtesy of Total, Cobalt and the Republic of Gabon

Page 7: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

CPI log showing thin/complex formations

7

Page 8: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Seismic synthetic model

Conventional seismic

synthetic

Conventional seismic data

at well location

Broadband seismic

synthetic Impedance

Page 9: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Seismic synthetic model

Conventional seismic

synthetic

Conventional seismic data

at well location

Broadband seismic

synthetic Impedance

Prominent side-lobe interfering with interpretation of conventional seismic data

Page 10: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Seismic synthetic model

Conventional seismic

synthetic

Conventional seismic data

at well location

Broadband seismic

synthetic Impedance

Peaks and troughs fit better with well marker

on broadband model

Page 11: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Seismic synthetic model

Conventional seismic

synthetic

Conventional seismic data

at well location

Broadband seismic

synthetic Impedance

Obvious impedance gradient

Obvious impedance gradient

No impedance gradient

NB: The low frequency component of broadband data give a better feel of the actual impedance gradients, which should in turn provide better seismic inversion results

Page 12: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Interpretation of Tertiary silici-clastic reservoirs

Page 13: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Interpretation of a gas reservoir

Side lobes

GR IP

Page 14: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Interpretation of a gas reservoir

GR IP

Page 15: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Interpretation of a gas reservoir

Page 16: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Interpretation of a gas reservoir

Page 17: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Interpretation of a gas reservoir

Page 18: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Interpretation of a gas reservoir

Page 19: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Ip from AVO inversion

Page 20: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Ip from AVO inversion

BroadSeis pre-stack inversion gives a more stable result: 1 – The GWC flat spot is better resolved 2 – Values of Ip within the gas column are more accurate and more homogeneous

Page 21: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Tay fan imaging (zoomed)

Page 22: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Tay fan imaging (zoomed)

Page 23: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband filtered – Tay fan imaging

Bandpass filter applied: 10-40Hz – 50-70Hz to approximately match spectrum of Conventional data

Page 24: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Tay fan imaging

Page 25: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Low frequency Tay fan imaging

Bandpass filter applied: 0-4Hz – 6-10Hz

Page 26: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Low frequency Tay fan imaging

Bandpass filter applied: 0-4Hz – 6-10Hz

Page 27: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Tertiary channel interpretation

Mey channel

Page 28: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Tertiary channel interpretation

Top Mey sandstone

Page 29: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Tertiary channel interpretation

Top Mey sandstone

Page 30: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Section through polygonal faults and contourites

Page 31: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Section through polygonal faults and contourites

Page 32: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Shallow section interpretation

Autopicking with waveform correlation tool on a wide window is noisy (spiky) on band limited data

Page 33: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Shallow section interpretation

Autopicking works a lot better on Broadband data, less spiky

Page 34: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Interpretation of Chalk facies

Page 35: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Well tie and Chalk interpretation

Page 36: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Well tie and Chalk interpretation

Page 37: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Well tie and Chalk interpretation

This low impedance, marly interval correlates with the edge of a bright amplitude dissolution feature in the upper chalk section on the

seismic data.

Page 38: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Ekofisk/Maureen RMS amplitude map

Upper Chalk clay ponds and dissolution features

1km

Page 39: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Ekofisk/Maureen RMS amplitude map

1km

Upper Chalk clay ponds and dissolution features

The chalk dissolution features (clay pools) are much better defined on broadband data

The gray scale trends in the background highlight the regional facies variations: darker grays to the left are indicative of a marlier chalk

section whereas light grays correspond to hard, carbonate-rich chalk.

Page 40: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

A recent Chalk discovery: Orchid

40

Page 41: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Orchid as interpreted on conventional data

41 Source: Trap Oil investor presentation

Page 42: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

W-E regional seismic line with interpretation

42

Orchid

Salt-induced high

Zechstein

salt West Central shelf

Page 43: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

S-N regional seismic line with interpretation

43

Orchid

Salt-induced high

Zechstein

salt

Page 44: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

W-E seismic line across Orchid

44

Phase reversal due to ‘soft’ response

from the oil-filled chalk reservoir?

Flat-spot or porosity

effect (or both)?

Page 45: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

NE-SE arbitrary seismic line across Orchid

45

Central Orchid is offset by a large fault initiated

due to uplift from the Zechstein salt below

Large salt diapir

towards the NW

Page 46: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Orchid chalk reservoir as interpreted on broadband data

46

TWT structure map Top Chalk amplitude map Minimum amplitude map directly below Top Chalk

Broadband data do not show amplitude dim in the

central part of the field

Page 47: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Interpretation of deep sub-BCU targets

Page 48: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Fault blocks interpretation using band-limited data

Cross fault correlation with multiple choices ?? Any reflector can be correlated through faults

?

?

?

?

?

BCU

Jurassic fault blocks

Page 49: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Fault blocks interpretation using broadband data

Cross fault correlation better understood Uniqueness of the reflector correlation through faults

BCU

Jurassic fault blocks

Page 50: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Jurassic fault blocks interpretation

Page 51: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Jurassic fault blocks interpretation

Page 52: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Jurassic fault blocks interpretation

Page 53: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Jurassic fault blocks interpretation

Page 54: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Conventional – Well synthetic, deep tie

NB: Well synthetic phase reversed for display purposes

Page 55: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband – Well synthetic, deep tie

NB: Well synthetic phase reversed for display purposes

Low frequency

package

This sub-BCU low frequency package is clearly visible on broadband seismic but not on conventional data, and it is replicated by a well

seismic synthetic. This means that this is the genuine formation signature and that the low frequencies below the BCU are not coming from

any kind of noise.

Page 56: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Summary – Benefits for qualitative interpretation

BroadSeis data provide a broader frequency spectrum enabling the interpreter to:

Accurately interpret stratigraphy, thin beds and subtle structures – benefit

from the high frequencies

Produce a clearer interpretation of deep targets (sub-BCU, sub-chalk, sub-basalt…) and large-scale and subtle facies variations – benefit from the low frequencies

Extract the ‘true’ seismic signature of the geological formations by reducing the wavelet side-lobes and sharpening its central peak – benefit from the broad frequency range

Page 57: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Broadband shallow imaging

57

Page 58: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

Acknowledgments

CGG multi-client division for permission to show these

data examples

Steven Bowman, James Rigg and Steve Thompson -

interpretation of seismic data and images contribution

Vincent Durussel, Steve Hollingworth and their team -

seismic processing

Page 59: Variable depth streamer technology for enhanced seismic

THANK YOU!

59