valuation of settlement positions alexander poltorak, ph.d. general patent corporation october 31,...

15
Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved.

Upload: joshua-calvin-mosley

Post on 13-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

Valuation of Settlement Positions

Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D.

General Patent Corporation

October 31, 2006

© General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved.

Page 2: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

2

Overview Rational Approach:

Taking emotions out of the equation; Patent litigation as risk management.

Litigation Risk Analysis: Decision Trees; Choosing probabilities.

Other Decision-Making Tools: Monte Carlo Simulation; Game Theory.

Page 3: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

3

Rational Approach:Taking emotions out of the equation

“Fighting to the death” is a sure way of getting your death wish.

“Never hate your enemies – it clouds your judgment.”

– The Godfather

“It’s not personal, it’s strictly business.” – The Godfather

Page 4: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

4

Rational Approach:Patent litigation as risk management Quantum Mechanics of patent litigation. Although patents are presumed valid, in

reality, they are neither valid nor invalid until tried in court.

Collapsing the wavefunction, i.e. going to court.

Litigation as risk management.

Page 5: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

5

Constructing a Decision Tree

Baby Tree

Patent is infringed65%

$5,000,000

Patent is not infringed35%

$0

Patent is enforceable89%

Patent is unenforceable11%

$0

Patent is valid65%

Patent is invalid35%

$0

Page 6: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

6

Decision Tree for Patent Litigation

Treble Damages No Treble Damages

Lost Profits

Treble Damages No Treble Damages

Reasonable Royalties

Enforceable

Unenforceable

Valid

Invalid

Infringed

Uninfringed

Page 7: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

7

Choosing Probabilities

National statistics: Validity: 65%; Enforceability: 89%; Infringement: 65%.

Statistics for your district: EDT: 88%; Massachusetts: 34%;

Statistics for your judge.

Page 8: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

8

Refining Probabilities

Specific issues impacting on the merits of your case:

Questions of ownership; Questions of inequitable conduct; Willfulness; Marking; Latches and/or estoppel; Other claims, e.g. breach of contract.

Delphi method.

Page 9: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

9

Rolling Back the Tree

Patent is infringed0.650

$5,000,000; P = 0.376

Patent is not infringed0.350

$0; P = 0.202

Patent is enforceable0.890

$3,250,000

Patent is unenforceable0.110

$0; P = 0.072

Patent is valid0.650

$2,892,500

Patent is invalid0.350

$0; P = 0.350

$1,880,125

Page 10: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

10

To Settle or Not to Settle

Win68%

$5M

Lose32%

0

Litigate

Settle$1M

Win0.680

$5.0M; P = 0.680

Lose0.320

$0.0M; P = 0.320

Litigate$3.4M

Settle$1.0M

Litigate : $3.4M

Page 11: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

11

To Settle or Not to Settle

When the plaintiff is a NPE.

When the plaintiff is a competitor.

Valuing a patent monopoly.

Page 12: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

12

Present Value of Patent Monopoly

Annual value of the monopoly:

Total value of the monopoly during the patent term:

Present value of the patent monopoly:

iiii GPGPPV Δ=−=)(

∑Δ==

l

iiPV

1)(

∑= +

Δ=

l

ii

i

i

IPPV

1 )1()(

Page 13: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

13

Common Mistakes

Various outcomes are not statistically independent.

Jury bias. Law of large numbers. Catastrophic outcomes.

Page 14: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

14

Other Decision-Making Tools

Monte Carlo Simulation

Game Theory

Page 15: Valuation of Settlement Positions Alexander Poltorak, Ph.D. General Patent Corporation October 31, 2006 © General Patent Corporation 2006. All rights reserved

15

ConclusionStay rational;Use of formal decision-making tools helps keep

emotions at bay;Use of decision tree helps compare certainty of

settlement with uncertainty of litigation;You get to play this game once – don’t gamble;Whatever the probability, if the result is

unacceptable you cannot take the chance;Trial is an expensive Russian roulette.