valuation of a firm. case problem ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty...

39
VALUATION OF A FIRM

Upload: arnold-neal

Post on 24-Dec-2015

239 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

VALUATION OF A FIRM

Page 2: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Case Problem

Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago.In mid 2005 its owner and founder June Wong has decided to sell the business after having relinquished management control four years earlier.PKK investments is investigating the purchase of the company at the end of the current fiscal year. PKK plans to implement operational and financial improvements at Ideko over the next five years, after which it intends to sell the business.

This case was shamelessly stolen from the text Corporate Finance by Berk and DeMarzo

Page 3: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Ideko

Ideko has assets of $87 million and annual sales of $75 million. The firm has earnings of almost $7 million for a profit margin of 9.3%. The owner is looking for $150 million as a sales price, almost double the book value of equity.The question: Is such a valuation reasonable?

Page 4: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Ideko – 2005 Income Statement and Balance Sheet.

Year 2005 Year 2005Income Statement ($000s) Balance Sheet ($000s)

1 Sales 75,000 Assets2 Cost of Goods Sold 1 Cash and Equivalents 12,664 3 Raw Materials (16,000) 2 Accounts Receivable 18,493 4 Direct Labor Costs (18,000) 3 Inventories 6,165 5 Gross Profit 41,000 4 Total Current Assets 37,322 6 Sales and Marketing (11,250) 5 Property, Plant, and Equipment 49,500 7 Administrative (13,500) 6 Goodwill - 8 EBITDA 16,250 7 Total Assets 86,822 9 Depreciation (5,500) Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

10 EBIT 10,750 8 Accounts Payable 4,654 11 Interest Expense (net) (75) 9 Debt 4,500 12 Pretax Income 10,675 10 Total Liabilities 9,154 13 Income Tax (3,736) 11 Stockholders' Equity 77,668 14 Net Income 6,939 12 Total Liabilities and Equity 86,822

Page 5: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Valuation Multiples for Proposed Transaction

P/E = 150/6.94EV/Sales = (150+4.5-6.5)/75EV/EBITDA = (150+4.5-6.5)/16.25Note: EV is enterprise value which is equity value plus debt value less excess cash ($6.5 M)(equity value plus net debt)

Page 6: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

What equity valuations are implied?

Example: For the low EV/Sales valuation the implied equityValue = 1.4*75+6.5-4.5=107.0

We would like to purchase for as low a price as possible.based on the multiples, an equity purchase price of $150million is in the low end of the valuation ranges.

Page 7: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

The Business Plan

Operational Improvements By cutting administrative costs and redirecting

resources to new product development, sales, and marketing, you believe Ideko can increase its market share from 10% to 15% over the next 5 years. The total market is expected to grow by 5% per year.

Expected Economic Conditions Ideko’s average selling price is forecast to increase 2%

each year (this is expected inflation).

Raw materials prices are forecast to increase at a 1% rate.

Labor costs are forecast to increase at a 4% rate.

Page 8: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

The Business Plan (cont'd)

Operational Improvements The increased sales demand can be

met in the short run using the existing production capacity. Once the growth in output exceeds 50%, however, Ideko will need to undertake a major expansion to increase its manufacturing capacity.

Page 9: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Capital Expenditures and Needed Expansion

Production volume reaches the breaking point, a 50% increase, in 2008 requiring an expansion of capacity at that time.

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Production Volume (000 units)

1 Market Size 10,000 10,500 11,025 11,576 12,155 12,763 2 Market Share 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0%3 Production Volume (1x2) 1,000 1,155 1,323 1,505 1,702 1,914

Production Capacity Requirements

Page 10: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Capital Expenditures and Needed Expansion

In 2008, a major expansion will be necessary, leading to a large increase in capital expenditures in 2008 and 2009. The estimated expenditures are:Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Fixed Assets and Capital Investment ($000s)1 Opening Book Value 50,000 49,500 49,050 48,645 61,781 69,102 2 Capital Investment 5,000 5,000 5,000 20,000 15,000 8,000 3 Depreciation (5,500) (5,450) (5,405) (6,865) (7,678) (7,710) 4 Closing Book Value 49,500 49,050 48,645 61,781 69,102 69,392

Ideko Capital Expenditure Assumptions

For simplicity, depreciation is assumed to be 10% of the sum of opening book value plus new capital expenditures.

Page 11: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Sales and Operating Cost Assumptions

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Sales Data Growth/Year

1 Market Size (000 units) 5.0% 10,000 10,500 11,025 11,576 12,155 12,763 2 Market Share 1.0% 10.0% 11.0% 12.0% 13.0% 14.0% 15.0%3 Aveage Sales Price ($/unit) 2.0% 75.00 76.50 78.03 79.59 81.18 82.81

Cost of Goods Data 4 Raw Materials ($/unit) 1.0% 16.00 16.16 16.32 16.48 16.65 16.82 5 Direct Labor Costs ($/unit) 4.0% 18.00 18.72 19.47 20.25 21.06 21.90

Operating Expense and Tax Data6 Sales and Marketing (% sales) 15.0% 16.5% 18.0% 19.5% 20.0% 20.0%7 Administrative (% sales) 18.0% 15.0% 15.0% 14.0% 13.0% 13.0%8 Tax Rate 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

Ideko Sales and Operating Cost Assumptions

Page 12: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Building the Financial Model

The total value of the firm consists of:

VF = PV(FCFT) + PV(TVT) + NOA

where:V - value of the businessPV(FCFT) - PV of the total FCF through year T

PV(TVT) - PV of the terminal value in year TNOA - market value of excess or non-operating assets (here, the excess cash)

Page 13: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Building the Financial Model

Forecasting Earnings To build the pro forma income statement,

begin with Ideko’s sales. Each year, sales can be calculated as:

The raw materials cost can be calculated from sales as (direct labor follows similarly):

Sales Market Size Market Share Average Sales Price

Raw Materials Market Size Market Share Raw Materials per Unit

Page 14: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Building the Financial Model

Forecasting Earnings Sales, marketing, and administrative

costs can be computed directly as a percentage of sales.

The corporate income tax is computed as:

Sales and Marketing Sales (Sales and Marketing % of Sales)

Income Tax Pretax Income Tax Rate

Page 15: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Pro-Forma Income Statement

Note that we ignore financing cash flows (interest).The effects of financing are accounted for in the WACC.

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Income Statement ($000s)

1 Sales 75,000 88,358 103,234 119,777 138,149 158,526 2 Cost of Goods Sold3 Raw Materials (16,000) (18,665) (21,593) (24,808) (28,333) (32,193) 4 Direct Labor Costs (18,000) (21,622) (25,757) (30,471) (35,834) (41,925) 5 Gross Profit 41,000 48,071 55,883 64,498 73,982 84,407 6 Sales and Marketing (11,250) (14,579) (18,582) (23,356) (27,630) (31,705) 7 Administrative (13,500) (13,254) (15,485) (16,769) (17,959) (20,608) 8 EBITDA 16,250 20,238 21,816 24,373 28,393 32,094 9 Depreciation (5,500) (5,450) (5,405) (6,865) (7,678) (7,710) 10 EBIT 10,750 14,788 16,411 17,508 20,715 24,383 11 Interest Expense (net) (75) 12 Pretax Income 10,675 14,788 16,411 17,508 20,715 24,383 13 Income Tax (3,736) (5,176) (5,744) (6,128) (7,250) (8,534) 14 Net Income 6,939 9,613 10,667 11,380 13,465 15,849

Pro Forma Income Statement for Ideko, 2005–2010

Page 16: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Working Capital Management

Ideko’s Accounts Receivable Days is:

While the industry average is 60 days You believe that Ideko can tighten its credit

policy to achieve the industry average without sacrificing sales.

Accounts Receivable ($)Accounts Receivable Days 365 days/yr

Sales Revenue ($ / yr)

18,493 365 days 90 days75,000

Page 17: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Working Capital Management…

Ideko’s inventory figure on its balance sheet includes $2 million of raw materials. Given raw material expenditures of $16 million for the year, Ideko currently holds 45.6 days worth of raw material inventory. (2 ∕16) × 365 = 45.6

You believe that, with tighter control of the production process, 30 days worth of inventory will be adequate.

Page 18: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Working Capital Management…

Note that all quantities are stated in days and are based on different income statement items.

Year 2005 >2005Working Capital DaysAssets Based On: Days Days

1 Accounts Receivable Sales Revenue 90 602 Raw Materials Raw Materials Costs 45 303 Finished Goods Raw Materials + Labor Costs 45 454 Minimum Cash Balance Sales Revenue 30 30

Liabilities5 Wages Payable Direct Labor + Admin Costs 15 156 Other Accounts Payable Raw Materials + Sales & Marketing 45 45

Ideko's Working Capital Requirements

Page 19: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Working Capital Requirements

The working capital forecast should include the plans to tighten Ideko’s credit policy, speed up customer payments, and reduce Ideko’s inventory of raw materials. Accounts Receivable in 2006 is calculated

as: Annual SalesAccounts Receivable Days Required

365 days/yr

$88.358 million/yr 60 days $14.525 million

365 days/yr

Page 20: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Working Capital Forecast

Note that the cash flows associated with working capital are thechanges in net working capital from year to year.

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Working Capital ($000s)Assets

1 Accounts Receivable 18,493 14,525 16,970 19,689 22,709 26,059 2 Raw Materials 1,973 1,534 1,775 2,039 2,329 2,646 3 Finished Goods 4,192 4,967 5,838 6,815 7,911 9,138 4 Minimum Cash Balance 6,164 7,262 8,485 9,845 11,355 13,030 5 Total Current Assets 30,822 28,288 33,067 38,388 44,304 50,872

Liabilities6 Wages Payable 1,294 1,433 1,695 1,941 2,211 2,570 7 Other Accounts Payable 3,360 4,099 4,953 5,938 6,900 7,878 8 Total Current Liabilities 4,654 5,532 6,648 7,879 9,110 10,448

Net Working Capital9 Net Working Capital (5 - 8) 26,168 22,756 26,419 30,509 35,194 40,425 10 Increase in Net Working Capital (3,412) 3,663 4,089 4,685 5,231

Ideko's Net Working Capital Forecast

Page 21: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Forecast of Free Cash Flow

The definition of free cash flow (FCF) is unlevered net income,plus depreciation, less changes in net working capital,less net capital expenditures.

Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Free Cash Flow ($000s)

3 Unlevered Net Income 9,613 10,667 11,380 13,465 15,849 4 Plus: Depreciation 5,450 5,405 6,865 7,678 7,710 5 Less: Increases in NWC 3,412 (3,663) (4,089) (4,685) (5,231) 6 Less: Capital Expenditures (5,000) (5,000) (20,000) (15,000) (8,000) 7 Free Cash Flow of Firm 13,475 7,409 (5,845) 1,458 10,328

Ideko's Free Cash Flow Forecast

Page 22: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Capital Structure Changes: Levering Up

You believe Ideko is significantly underleveraged so you plan to increase the firm’s debt.

You believe that a debt-to-value (D/(E+D)) ratio of 40% is appropriate.

With this capital structure, you believe that the debt will be risky and will have a beta of 0.25.

Page 23: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Estimating the Cost of Capital

CAPM-Based Estimation Since Ideko is not publicly traded,

comparable firms must be used to estimate the firm’s beta. The beta for comparable firms is calculated from the regression:

MarketS RR

Page 24: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Beta Estimates

Page 25: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Unlevering Beta

Given an estimate of each firm’s equity beta, the “unlevered” beta must be calculated, based on the firm’s capital structure.

DEU DED

DEE

E/(E+D D/(E+D)

Equity Beta Monthly Returns Debt Beta

Unlevered Beta

Oakley 1.00 0.00 1.99 0.00 1.99Luxottica 0.83 0.17 0.56 0.00 0.67Nike 1.05 -0.05 0.48 0.00 0.46

Page 26: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Ideko’s Unlevered Beta

The data from the comparable firms provides guidance for estimating Ideko’s unlevered cost of capital. Ideko’s products are not as high end as Oakley’s

eyewear, so Ideko’s sales are unlikely to vary as much with the business cycle as Oakley’s sales do.

Ideko does not have a prescription eyewear division, as does Luxottica.

Ideko’s products are fashion items rather than exercise items (Nike).

Page 27: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Ideko’s Levered Beta

Given the above analysis, Ideko’s cost of capital is likely to be closer to (but less than) Oakley’s than it is to Nike’s or Luxottica’s. You decide to put 50% weight on the beta of Oakley, and 25% on Luxottica and Nike. Based on this you decide on 1.28 as your estimate for Ideko’s unlevered beta.Now relever this beta to reflect the 40% debt to value ratio that will be applied after the acquisition. Remember that you expect a debt beta of 0.25. 97.1)25.028.1(

6.04.0

28.1)( DUUE ED

Page 28: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Ideko’s WACCAssume that the current risk-free interest rate is 4% and that you believe a market risk premium of 5% is appropriate.Ideko’s cost of equity is:

Ideko’s cost of debt is:

%85.13)5(*97.14)][( fMEquityfEquity RRERR

%25.5)5(*25.04)][( fMDebtfDebt RRERR

Page 29: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Ideko’s WACCIdeko’s tax rate is 35%.Ideko’s WACC is:

%67.9)35.01(*25.5*4.085.13*6.0

)1(

CDE TRDE

DR

DEE

WACC

Page 30: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Continuation Value

We have forecast the cash flows out to year 2010 (five years)However, we need to estimate the value of all of the cash flows to be received after 2010.We could continue to forecast pro-forma statements, but this would be difficult.Instead, we forecast cash flows explicitly up to the point we believe the business will reach a steady state of growth and then summarize the remaining cash flows in what is called the continuation (or terminal) value.

Page 31: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Continuation Value

The Multiples Approach to Continuation Value

Practitioners often estimate a firm’s continuation value (also called the terminal value) at the end of the forecast horizon using a valuation multiple, with the EBITDA multiple being the multiple most often used in practice.Continuation Enterprise Value at Forecast Horizon

EBITDA at Horizon EBITDA Multiple at Horizon

Continuation Value: Multiples Approach ($000s)1 EBITDA in 2010 32,094 2 EBITDA multiple 9.0x3 Continuation Enterprise Value 288,843

Page 32: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Continuation Value (cont'd)

The Multiples Approach to Continuation Value One difficulty with relying on comparables

when forecasting a continuation value is that future multiples of the firm are being compared with current multiples of its competitors.

This is especially problematic if the industry is presently in a phase of either rapid growth or decline.

Page 33: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

The Discounted Cash Flow Approach to Continuation Value

The enterprise value in year T, using the WACC valuation method, is calculated as:

Free cash flow in year T + 1 is computed as:

1Enterprise Value in Year

L TT

wacc

FCFT V

r g

1 1 1

1 1

Unlevered Net Income Depreciation

Increases in NWC Capital ExpendituresT T T

T T

FCF

Page 34: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

The Discounted Cash Flow Approach to Continuation Value (cont'd)

If the firm’s sales are expected to grow at a nominal rate g and the firm’s operating expenses remain a fixed percentage of sales, then its unlevered net income will also grow at rate g.

Similarly, the firm’s receivables, payables, and other elements of net working capital will grow at rate g.

Page 35: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

The Discounted Cash Flow Approach to Continuation Value (cont'd)

If capital expenditures are defined as:

Then free cash flows, given g, can be estimated as:

Or, sometimes it is simply assumed that free cash flow grows at rate g:

1 1Capital Expenditures Depreciation Fixed AssetsT T Tg

1F (1 ) Unlevered Net Income Net Working Capital

Fixed AssetsT T T

T

CF g g

g

)1(1 gFCFFCF TT

Page 36: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Ideko’s continuation value (DCF approach)

In 2010 unlevered net income is $15,849, the level of working capital is $40,425 and the level of fixed assets is $69,392.Assume that you believe the business can grow at 5% per year indefinitely after 2010.

The average growth rate in nominal GDP is a good starting point for such a growth rate.

The free cash flow in 2011 is:FCF2011=15,849*(1.05)-40,425*(0.05)-9,392*(0.05)=

$11,151

Page 37: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Ideko’s continuation value (DCF approach)

FCF at 2011 is $11,151, the WACC is 9.67%The continuation (terminal) value (in $000’s) is:

Note this implies an EBITDA multiple of 7.4x

032,239$05.00967.0

151,112010

TV

Page 38: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Valuation of Ideko using WACC method

1 2 3 4 5WACC= 9.67% Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010WACC Method ($000s)

1 Free Cash Flow 13,475 7,409 (5,845) 1,458 10,328 2 Continuation Value 239,032 3 PV at 2005 12,287 6,160 (4,432) 1,008 157,212 4 Enterprise Value 172,236 175,408 184,953 208,673 227,384 239,032 5 Less Existing Debt (4,500) 6 Plus Excess Cash 6,500 7 Ideko Firm Value 174,236 175,408 184,953 208,673 227,384 239,032 8 Ideko Debt Value 69,695 70,163 73,981 83,469 90,953 95,613 9 Ideko Equity Value 104,542 105,245 110,972 125,204 136,430 143,419

Estimate of Ideko's Initial Equity Value (WACC)

PV of future cash flows from 2007 onward (etc.).

Page 39: VALUATION OF A FIRM. Case Problem Ideko is a privately held designer and manufacturer of specialty sports eyewear based in Chicago. In mid 2005 its owner

Capital Structure Changes:

Levering Up (cont'd)

In addition to the $150 million purchase price for Ideko’s equity, $4.5 million will be used to repay Ideko’s existing debt.

PKK’s sources of funds include the new loan of $69.7 million as well as Ideko’s own excess cash (which PKK will have access to). Thus PKK’s required equity contribution to the transaction is $78.3 million.

Acquistion Financing ($000s)Sources Uses

1 New Term Loan 69,695 Purchase Ideko Equity 150,000 2 Excess Ideko Cash 6,500 Repay Existing Ideko Debt 4,500 3 PKK Equity Investment 78,305 Advisory and Other Fees - 4 Total Sources of Funds 154,500 Total Uses of Funds 154,500

Sources and Uses of Funds for the Ideko Acquisition