validity and screening test
TRANSCRIPT
Validity and Screening test
results
P. AnnapurnaRoll.89
Guided by Dr. Sipra mam
Validity Refers to what extent the test accurately
measures the disease •Expresses the ability of a test to
distinguish those have the disease from those who don’t
•Eg: for diabetes, screening test is urine glucose examination but more valid test is glucose tolerance test
Three key measures of validity1. Sensitivity2. Specificity3. Predictive value
Screening tests result includes..
• True positives• True negatives• False positives• False
negatives
1. True positives - sick people correctly diagnosed as sick
2. False positives - healthy people incorrectly identified as
sick3. True negatives - healthy people
correctly identified as healthy
4. False negatives - sick people incorrectly identified as healthy
Screening test result Test result
diseased
Not diseased
Total
Positive A (true positive)
B (false positive)
A+B
Negative
C (false negative)
D (true negative)
C+D
Total A+C B+D A+B+C+D
Sensitivity - ability of a test to identify correctly all those who have a disease i.e. true positives.
• If the test is highly sensitive & the test result is negative, you can certain that they don’t have disease
• 90% sensitivity means 90% of diseased are screened as true positives & remaining 10% are true negatives.Sensitivity =A/A+C x 100
Specificity - ability of the test to identify those who don’t have the disease correctly as true negatives•If the test is highly specific & test result is positive it means they actually have a disease•If 90% of specificity means 90% of people are true negatives & remaining 10% will be wrongly diagnosed as diseased
Specificity =D/B+D x 100
• 2/> tests can be used in combination in order to increase the sensitivity and specificity of a test
• E.g. For syphilis, patients first evaluated by RPR test, whose sensitivity is high but still gives false positives, hence second test is applied, i.e. FTA- ABS which is more specific test and the resultant positives are true positives.
• Types - 1. Sequential testing 2. Simultaneous testing
Combinational testing
Comparison
• Performed separately.• both times we are
eliminating negative results (FN,TN) which are indicators of actual positives.
• Indicator of sensitivity. net sensitivity is low. net
specificity is high
• Performed in parallel.• Positive result in any
one of the tests, is considered as positive in disease.
• Net sensitivity is
higher.. But specificity is low
Simultaneous testing
Sequential testing
Test results 1900
150
7600
2250
7750
315 190
35 1710
505
1745
Test results
Sequential testingTest-1 (Blood sugar)- Diabetes
Test-2 (GTT)- Diabetes
350
Simultaneous testing
144
200 people having disease
180 test positive by test B
but some of them are tested positive by both of them
160 TP by test A
180 TP by test B
16 TP only by test A
36 TP only by test B
160 TP by test A
144 TP by both tests
16 36
Thus net sensitivity using both tests simultaneously
16 +144 +36 / 200 = 198/ 200 = 98%
Net sensitivity
800 people who do not have disease
480 TN by test A
720 TN by test B
Some of them are tested negative by both tests
480 TN by test A
720 TN by test B
48 TN only by test A 288 TN only
by test B
432 TN by tests A & B Thus , net specificity using
both tests simultaneously
432
432 / 800 = 54 %
Net specificity
Determined by predictive value a. positive predictive value b. negative predictive value• Useful to know what proportion of patients with abnormal tests results are truly abnormal.
• They reflect diagnostic power of a test
Predictive accuracy
The predictive value of a positive test indicates the probability that a patient with a positive test result has the disease in question.• PPV of 90% means 90% of people who are diagnosed to be positive by the test in fact have the disease in question. calculated by (A) X 100 (A + B )
Positive predictive value
The predictive value of a negative test indicates the probability that a patient with a negative test result doesn’t the disease in question.•NPV of 90% means 90% of patients who are diagnosed to be negative by the test in fact do not have the disease . (D) X 100 (C +D)
Negative predictive value
• A test is used in 50 people with disease and 50 people without..
48. 3 51
2 47 49
Disease
Test
• Sensitivity = 48/50 = 96%
• Specificity = 47/50 = 94%
• Positive predictive value = 48/51 = 94%
• Negative predictive value = 47/49 = 96%
Predictive values depend strongly on prevalence of the condition.
• As the prevalence of a condition increases PPV increases ,thus more chances of getting TP results.
• If the condition is uncommon , then a negative test indicates no abnormality.
Effect of prevalence
Relationship of disease prevalence to positive predictive value
Eg: sensitivity=99%,specificity=95%
Disease prevalence Test
valuesSick Not sick Totals PPV
1%
5%
+_
Totals
+_
Totals
991
100
4955
500
4959,405
9,900
4759,025
9,500
5949,406
10,000
9709,030
10,000
99/594 =17%
495/970 =51%
Thank you