validation of the bremsstrahlung models

26
Validation of the Validation of the Bremsstrahlung Bremsstrahlung models models Susanna Guatelli, Barbara Mascialino, Luciano Pandola, Maria Grazia Pia, Pedro Rodrigues, Andreia Trindade IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium San Diego, 30 October – 4 November 2006 INFN Genova – INFN Gran Sasso Laboratory - LIP

Upload: taima

Post on 11-Jan-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models. Susanna Guatelli, Barbara Mascialino, Luciano Pandola, Maria Grazia Pia, Pedro Rodrigues, Andreia Trindade. INFN Genova – INFN Gran Sasso Laboratory - LIP. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium San Diego, 30 October – 4 November 2006. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

Validation of theValidation of the

Bremsstrahlung modelsBremsstrahlung models

Susanna Guatelli, Barbara Mascialino, Luciano

Pandola, Maria Grazia Pia, Pedro Rodrigues, Andreia

Trindade

IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium San Diego, 30 October – 4 November 2006

INFN Genova – INFN Gran Sasso Laboratory - LIP

Page 2: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 2

Geant4 electron Bremsstrahlung

2 electromagnetic physics packages

StandarStandardd

Low Low EnergyEnergy

3 Bremsstrahlung processes

G4eBremsstrahlung

G4PenelopeBremsstrahlung

G4eLowEnergyBremsstrahlung

Tsai

Tsai

2BN 2BSangular distributionsangular distribution

Page 3: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 3

Validation of Geant4 EM physics

K. Amako et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52 (2005) 910

Ongoing large-scale Ongoing large-scale projectproject Photon mass attenuation

coefficientRange, Stopping power (e, p, )

NIST

NSS 2006Atomic relaxation (fluorescence, Auger effect)

Proton Bragg peakElectron Bremsstrahlung

BremsstrahluBremsstrahlungng

Difficult to find reference dataThin/thick target experiments

Difficult to disentangle effects(because of the continuous part)

1st validation cycle:

focus on low focus on low energyenergy

Page 4: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 4

The experimental set-up

e- beam(70 keV-10 MeV) incident on a slab of material

Z axiselectrons

Photon(energy, θ)

θ

YieldYield, EnergyEnergy and Polar Polar AngleAngle of the emitted photons

Electrons and -rays are absorbed Bremsstrahlung photons can be

transmitted

Secondary production threshold = 0.5 m

Quantitatitative comparisonof experimental - simulated distributions

Statistical Statistical ToolkitToolkit

Goodness-of-Fit test

Page 5: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 5

Data setsN. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

Thin target: Be, Al, Au - 2.72.7, 4.5 4.5, 9.79.7 MeVDouble differential cross sections

W.E. Dance et al., Journal of Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 2881

Thick target: Al, Fe – 0.50.5, 1 1 MeVDouble differential cross sectionsIntegrated yield R. Ambrose et al., NIM B 56/57 (1991) 327

Absolute and relative yield

Preliminary Preliminary resultsresults

Work in progress!Work in progress!

Page 6: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 6

Double differential at 2.7 MeV on thin (2.63 mg/cm2) Be target

Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 7: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 7

Double differential at 4.5 MeV on thin (2.63 mg/cm2) Be target

Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 8: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 8

Double differential at 9.7 MeV on thin (2.63 mg/cm2) Be target

Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 9: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 9

Double differential at 2.7 MeV on thin (0.878 mg/cm2) Al target

Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 10: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 10

Double differential at 2.7 MeV on thin (0.878 mg/cm2) Al target

Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 11: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 11

Double differential at 4.5 MeV on thin (0.878 mg/cm2) Al target

Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 12: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 12

Double differential at 9.7 MeV on thin (0.878 mg/cm2) Al target

Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 13: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 13

Double differential at 2.7 MeV on thin (0.209 mg/cm2) Au target

Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 14: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 14

Double differential at 4.5 MeV on thin (0.209 mg/cm2) Au target

Energy (MeV) Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 15: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 15

Double differential at 9.7 MeV on thin (0.209 mg/cm2) Au target

Energy (MeV)

Energy (MeV)

N. Starfelt et al., Phys. Rev. 102 (1956) 1598

data+ simulation

data+ simulation

Page 16: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 16

Angular distribution

Red = data

Black = simulation

o Al Fe

Standard package

Absolute comparison

Ethr = 46 keV W.E. Dance et al., Journal of Applied Physics 39 (1968)

2881500 keV electrons on

Al (0.548 g/cm2) and Fe (0.257 g/cm2)

Thick target experimentThick target experiment

500 keV500 keV

Page 17: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 17

Angular distribution

precise agreemen

t!

W.E. Dance et al., Journal of Applied Physics 39 (1968) 2881

500 keV500 keV

Page 18: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 18

Angular distributionW.E. Dance et al., Journal of Applied Physics 39 (1968) 2881

500 keV500 keV

Page 19: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 19

Angular distribution

Red = data

Black = simulation

o Al Fe

Same test for 1 MeV primary electrons

(threshold: 50 keV)Standard package

Absolute comparison

W.E. Dance et al., Journal of Applied Physics 39 (1968)

2881Targets: Al (0.548 g/cm2)

and Fe (0.613 g/cm2)

1 MeV1 MeV

Page 20: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 20

Angular distribution

Good agreement for Al - Reasonable also for Fe (2BN)

precise agreemen

t!

W.E. Dance et al., Journal of Applied Physics 39 (1968) 2881

1 MeV1 MeV

Page 21: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 21

Angular distribution

2BS: good for Al and Fe (except in the backward direction)

W.E. Dance et al., Journal of Applied Physics 39 (1968) 2881

500 keV500 keV

Page 22: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 22

Integral yieldTotal yield on Al

integrated

on (0 ) and

on energy (Eth Emax)Standard process

o data

simul.

W.E. Dance et al., Journal of Applied Physics 39 (1968) 2881

Page 23: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 23

Angular distributions

Angle (deg) Angle (deg)

Angular distribution of photons is strongly model-dependent

Penelope

Standard

Low Energy (TSAI)

Penelope

TSAI

2BS

2BN

70 keV70 keV

Low Energy PackageLow Energy Package

Page 24: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 24

Energy distribution at 70 keV

70 keV electrons impinging on Al (25.4 mg/cm2)

Penelope

Low Energy - TSAI

Photon energy (keV)

Inte

nsi

ty/Z

(eV

/sr

keV

)

70 keV e-

photon directio

n45 deg

R. Ambrose et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. B 56/57 (1991)

327

Page 25: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 25

Relative comparison at 70 keV

Relative comparison (45° direction) Shapes of the spectra are in good agreement

Inte

nsi

ty/Z

(eV

/sr

keV

)

Photon energy (keV)

Photon energy (keV)

PenelopeLow Energy

- TSAI

Inte

nsi

ty/Z

(eV

/sr

keV

)

Page 26: Validation of the Bremsstrahlung models

S. Guatelli, B. Mascialino, L. Pandola, M.G. Pia, P. Rodrigues, A. Trindade 26

Conclusions A project is in progress to test all

Geant4 Bremsstrahlung models Rigorous, quantitative comparison

against experimental data Preliminary results at low energies

Power of the toolkit strategy Geant4 models differ significantly at low

energy