v235/12 07.10.2015 present: petitioner in person with ld...

V235/1207.10.2015Present: Petitioner in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Sudhir

Gupta. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the matter has been settled between the parties amicably in terms of Mark A in the mediation center. Separate statement of the petitioner has been recorded to this effect. In view of the same, present petition is disposed off as settled in Mediation Center. Both the parties will remain bound by the settlement.

File be consigned to record room. (GEETANJALI)

MM Mahila Court/East07.10.2015

Ex. No. 30/1407.10.2015Present: DH in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Sudhir

Gupta. It is submitted by the counsel for the DH that the matter has been settled between the parties amicably in terms of Mark A (copy of the same is lying in main petition) in the mediation center. Separate statement of the DH has been recorded to this effect. In view of the same, present petition is disposed off as settled in Mediation Center. Both the parties will remain bound by the settlement.



FIR No. 2095/14PS Shakarpur

07.10.2015Present: Ld. APP for State.

Shri Ashok Budhiraja, Ld. Counsel for accused. Accused Rajesh Kapoor absent. Summons sent to accused and his surety received

back served, however an application seeking exemption from his personal appearance through his counsel has been moved on personal grounds. Heard. Exemption is allowed for today only.

Put up for appearance of accused/further proceedings on 09.11.2015.

(GEETANJALI)MM Mahila Court/East

07.10.2015

V86/1407.10.2015Present: Petitioner in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Sanjay

Goswami. Court notice issued to petitioner as well as her

counsel received back unserved. At this stage, it is submitted by the counsel for the

petitioner that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties outside the court and in pursuance of the same, she does not want to proceed with the present petition. Separate statement of the petitioner has been recorded to this effect. In view of the same, present petition is disposed off as settled.



FIR No. 531/03PS Shakarpur


Accused absent. Shri Harish Kumar, Ld. Counsel for accused. Complainant in person. SI Om Prakash absent. Shri Vijay Kumar Lucky, Ld. Counsel for PW SI Om Prakash. Matter is fixed for PE, however an application seeking

exemption from his personal appearance has been moved through counsel on personal grounds. Heard. Allowed for today only.

Summons sent to PW Mohd. Chaman received back unserved. At this stage, complainant who is his daughter has furnished his fresh address i.e. S521, School Block,Near TVS Showroom, Shakarpur, Delhi. Let PW Mohd. Chaman be summoned on that address.

Summons sent to PW Om Prakash received back with the report that he has expired. His counsel has furnished his death certificate. Let the same be verified through SHO.

Summons sent to PW Ct. Rajesh received back unserved. Let he be summoned again for the NDOH.

Put up for PE for 30.10.2015. (GEETANJALI)

MM Mahila Court/East

07.10.2015

FIR No. 105/11PS Vivek Vihar


Accused in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Ashok Kumar. Matter is fixed for PE, however no PW is present.

Summons sent to PWs Raju Mukhija and Sonu received back unserved through IO. Let they be summoned through DCP (East) for the next date of hearing.

Put up for PE on 15.01.2016.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 249/13PS Preet Vihar


Accused is PO. HC Chander Bhan in person.

HC Chander Bhan seeks some more time to file supplementary charge sheet. Heard. Allowed.

Matter is fixed for PE u/s 299 Cr. PC, however no PW is present.



07.10.2015


Accused in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Sandeep Srivastava. At request, accused Amit Chaudhary is released on

regular bail on furnishing B/B in the sum of Rs. 20,000/ with one surety of the like amount. B/B furnished, attested and same is accepted. Pension book be returned after endorsing the same to the extent of the amount of bail bond.

Copies of challan supplied to accused against receipt. Put up for scrutiny/arguments on charge on 07.01.2016.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 84/07PS Farsh Bazar


Accused Premwati absent. Other accused in person with Ld. Proxy counsel Shri Sanjiv Chaudhary. PW1 in person. Matter is fixed for crossexamination of PW1,

however an application seeking exemption from personal appearance of the accused Premwati has been moved on medical grounds. Further, ld. Proxy counsel for accused seeks adjournment for crossexamining the witness on the ground that the main counsel is not available today. Heard. In view of the same, application is allowed for today only. Accordingly, PW1 is discharged unexamined for today and bound down for the next date of hearing.

Report regarding case property not filed. Notice be issued to SHO for the NDOH.



07.10.2015

V150/1407.10.2015Present: Petitioner in person with Ld. Counsel Mohd.

Jahid. Respondent no. 1 in person. Matter is fixed for filing of income

affidavit/replication/arguments on interim application. At this stage, respondent no. 1 has filed his reply.

Copy supplied and accordingly, ld. Counsel for petitioner seeks time to file replication. Heard. Allowed.

Income affidavit of petitioner filed. Copy supplied. Respondent no. 1 seeks time to file income affidavit. Heard. Allowed.

Arguments on the interim application heard in part from the side of petitioner and respondent no. 1 seeks adjournment for the same on the ground that his counsel is not available today. Heard. Allowed. At this stage, it is submitted by Ld. Counsel for petitioner that petitioner has a small school going child and she is facing great hardship in fulfilling her basic necessities and some ad interim maintenance be fixed.

Heard and perused the file. Admittedly, respondent no. 1 is earning Rs. 4500/ per

month. In view of the same, respondent no. 1 is hereby directed to pay Rs. 2200/ per month as maintenance for petitioner and her child from the date of order till disposal of the interim application.

Put up for filing of income affidavit of respondent no. 1/replication/arguments on interim application on 18.01.2016.


07.10.2015

V42/1407.10.2015Present: Petitioner in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Amit

Sisodia. Respondent Manish in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Pradeep Tyagi. Matter is fixed for disposal of the application for

recalling of the order dated 26.08.2015, however adjournment sought by ld. Counsel for petitioner/applicant on the ground that he has not read the file. Heard. Allowed.

Put up for disposal of the above said application on 08.12.2015.


07.10.2015

V12/1507.10.2015Present: Shri Inderjeet Singh, Ld. Counsel for petitioner.

Respondent no. 1 in person with Ld. Proxy Counsel Shri M.S. Gupta. Matter is fixed for filing of income

affidavit/arguments on interim application, however it is submitted by the counsel for the parties that the matter has been settled in Mediation Center and seek time to withdraw the present case. Heard. Allowed.

Put up for further proceedings on 14.10.2015.


07.10.2015

V36/1307.10.2015Present: Petitioner in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Ashok

Kumar. Respondent Ramesh Chand in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Anil Singh.

Matter is fixed for PE. At this stage, it is stated by the parties that there

are chances of amicable settlement between them and submits that the matter be sent to Mediation Centre. Heard and allowed. Parties are directed to appear before the Ld. Mediator on 08.10.2015 at 12.00 noon.

Ahlmad is directed to send the file well in advance. In case the mediation fails, put up for PE on 15.01.2016.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 293/14PS Geeta Colony


Accused in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Manish Kumar. Matter is fixed for arguments on charge. Arguments

on the point of charge heard. Record perused.In Umar Abdula Sakoor Sorathia Vs. Intelligence

Officer Narcotic Control Bureau, JT 1999(5) SC. It was held that: “It is well settled that at the stage of framing charge, the court is not expected to go deep into the probative value of the material on record. If on the basis of material on record, the court could come to the conclusion that the accused would have committed the offence, the court is obliged to frame the charge and proceed with trial. Our known Hon'ble High Court in case titled as Sapna Ahuja Vs. State 1999 (5) AD Delhi 407 has observed that at the time of framing of charge FIR and the material collected by the investigating agency cannot be sieved through the call ender of the finest gauzes to test its veracity. A roving inquiry into the pros and cons of the case by weighing the evidence is not expected or warranted at the stage of framing charge.”

In the present case, perusal of charge sheet, statement of witnesses recorded U/s. 161 Cr.P.C and other material available on record shows prima facie case against the accused for the offence charged. Hence charge under Sections 354D/506 IPC is framed against the accused to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.

Put up on 16.01.2016 for PE. Public witness/complainant be summoned first.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 111/07PS Farsh Bazar


Accused Rama Kant absent. Accused Gyatri Devi is exempted through counsel. Ms. Saifali, Ld. Counsel for accused persons. PWs Nisha Sharma and Jagdish in person.

Matter is fixed for PE, however accused Rama Kant is not present.

At this stage, it is submitted by complainant that accused Rama Kant is in judicial custody in execution petition and he will appear in the court on 31.10.2015. In view of the same, production warrants against accused Rama Kant be issued for the NDOH.

Put up for PE for 31.10.2015. (GEETANJALI)


No. 07.10.2015Present:

(GEETANJALI)


V142/1507.10.2015Present: Petitioner in person with Ld. LAC Shri Ashok

Kumar. Respondentd absent. Matter is fixed for appearance of respondents,

however none has appeared on behalf of respondents despite wait and repeated calls since morning. Accordingly, respondents are proceeded ex parte.

Put up for ex parte PE for 07.12.2015.


07.10.2015

V146/0907.10.2015Present: Petitioner in person with Ld. Counsel Shri Farukh

Khan. Father of respondent with Ld. Counsel Shri Santosh Kumar.Matter is fixed for final arguments.At this stage, two separate applications i.e. one for

recalling of order dated 16.09.2015 and allowing for completing crossexamination of respondent no. 1 and another application u/s 311 Cr. PC. for producing original footage of the marriage ceremony filed on behalf of petitioner. Copy supplied.

Put up for reply/disposal of the above said application on 16.12.2015.


07.10.2015

Ex. No. 54/15PS Jagatpuri07.10.2015

Fresh execution petition received by way of assignment. It be checked and registered.Present: DH in person with Sh. Yash Pal Sharma.

Issue notice of the petition to the JD on filing of PF

through SHO returnable on 06.11.2015. PF be filed within

seven days.

Nazir to report.

(Geetanjali) MM Mahila Court/East

07.10.2015

C. No. V-121/15PS Geeta Colony07.10.2015Present: Sh. Pratham Sharma, ld. counsel for petitioner.

Respondent no. 1 in person with ld. counsel Sh. Jai Bansal.

Respondent no. 1 is directed to file reply within 30

days with advance copy to the opposite party a week before the

next date of hearing.

Respondent no. 1 and petitioner are also directed

to file affidavit of income and assets alongwith supporting

documents in terms of Kusum Sharma Vs. Mahinder Kumar

Sharma decided on 14.01.2015 by the Hon’ble High Court of

Delhi with advance copy to the opposite party at least a week

before the NDOH.

At this stage, respondent no. 1 has filed an

application for seeking dismissal of the present petition. Copy of

the same is supplied to the opposite party.

Put up for replication/ filing of income affidavit/

arguments on interim application/reply to the said application on

15.01.2016.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 68/10PS Jagatpuri07.10.2015Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Accused Vinod Kumar in person with ld. counsel Sh. Satish Verma.

The present FIR has been quashed by the Hon'ble Justice Sh. Sunil Gaur vide his order dated 05.08.2015. Certified copy of the order has been received.

In view of the same, proceedings in this case are hereby dropped. Bail bond canceled. Surety discharged. Original documents be returned against receipt and on verification of identity. Endorsement, if any, be canceled.

File be consigned to record room.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 213/08PS Geeta Colony07.10.2015Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Accused Badari Prashad in person.Other accused are absent.

It is submitted by the accused that the present FIR

has been quashed by Hon'ble Justice Sh. Suresh Kait vide his

order dated 28.09.2015. Copy of the order has been filed.

Be awaited for certified copy of the order on

20.11.2015.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 151/11PS Krishna Nagar07.10.2015Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Accused Vikas in person.

Matter is fixed for PE, however, PW-1 Parul is

absent despite bound down on the last date of hearing. Hence,

issue bailable warrants in sum of Rs. 5,000/- against PW-1

Parul for the NODH.



07.10.2015

FIR No. 171/05PS Farsh Bazar07.10.2015Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Accused Anurag in person with ld. counsel Sh. V. S. Duby.

Accused Vishal is absent.PW-2 is absent.Sh. Gaurav Kakar, ld. counsel for

complainant/PW-2.

Matter is fixed for PE, however, no PW is present.

An application seeking exemption from personal

appearance on behalf of the accused Vishal has been moved on

personal grounds. Heard and allowed for today only.

Summons sent to PW Hemant and Smt. Vimla Devi

received back served, however, they have not appeared today

and an oral request for the exemption of PWs has been made

by their counsel on personal grounds. Heard and allowed for

today only. They be summoned again for the NDOH.



07.10.2015

FIR No. 84/13PS Shakarpur07.10.2015Present: Ld. APP for the State.

All accused in person with counsel Sh. P. S. Dhaka.

Surety Mumtaz Mohd. in person.

Matter is fixed for verification of bail bond of accused Naseem Begum/SOD/arguments on charge. Bail bond verification has not been received. Let same be verified again. SOD is complete. Adjournment sought for arguments on charge by ld. counsel for accused persons on the ground that he has not read the file. Heard and allowed.

Put up for verification of bail bond of accused Naseem Begum/arguments on charge on 08.01.2016.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 76/99PS Anand Vihar07.10.2015Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Accused Gurcharan in person with ld. counsel Sh. A. K. Mehta.

Accused Javed is absent.Sh. Pankaj Tomar, ld. counsel for complainant.

Matter is fixed for PE, however, an application

seeking exemption from personal appearance on behalf of the

accused Javed has been moved on personal grounds. Heard

and allowed for today only subject to the condition that accused

will not dispute his identity during examination of the witness.

Accordingly, PW-9 Sanjay Kochar is cross-examination and

discharged. PW- 10 HC Preet Singh and PW-11 ACP Sh.

Ashwani Kumar Jaswal are examined, cross-examined and

discharged. No other PW is present.

Summons sent to PW HC Surender Singh and Ct.

Upender received back unserved. Let they be summoned again

through SHO concerned for the NDOH. Summons sent to PW

Insp. Kali Ram Mali received back served with request. Let he

be summoned again for the NDOH.

Summons sent to PW SI Ram Mehar and Gulshan

Madan received back served, however, they have not appeared

despite wait and repeated calls since morning. Hence, issue

bailable warrants in sum of Rs. 5,000/- each against them for

the NDOH.



07.10.2015

Ex. No. 31/15PS Anand Vihar07.10.2015Present: DH in person.

JD in person.

JD has made the payment of Rs. 60,000/- in cash

to the DH towards maintenance on receipt.

Put up for further payment on 08.12.2015.


07.10.2015

C. No. V-52/13PS Anand Vihar07.10.2015Present: Petitioner in person.

Respondent in person.

Matter is fixed for PE, however, adjournment

sought by the petitioner on the ground that her counsel is not

available today. Heard and allowed.



07.10.2015

07.10.2015Present: Petitioner in person.

Respondent in person with ld. counsel.

Matter is fixed for filing of reply/arguments on

interim application, however, adjournment sought by the

petitioner on the ground that her counsel is not available today.

Heard and allowed.

At this stage, It is submitted by the respondent that

he has paid the school fees of his child of this quarter also.

Put up for filing of reply/arguments on interim

application on 14.12.2015.


07.10.2015


Accused is absent.Sh. Sanjiv Chaudhary, ld. counsel for accused.

The present FIR has been quashed by the Hon'ble

Justice Sh. Suresh Kait vide his order dated 03.08.2015.

Certified copy of the order has been received. Copy of cost

receipt has been filed as per order.

In view of the same, proceedings in this case are

hereby dropped. Bail bond canceled. Surety discharged.

Original documents be returned against receipt and on

verification of identity. Endorsement, if any, be canceled.



07.10.2015


Accused in person with ld. counsel Sh. Sanjay Singh.

Complainant in person.IO is absent.

Summons sent to IO received back unserved. Let

IO be summoned again through SHO concerned for NDOH.

Put up for 29.10.2015 at 02.00 p.m.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 942/14PS Krishna Nagar07.10.2015

File taken up on the application.Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Both accused in person with ld. counsel Sh. Kuldeep Mansukhani.

Separate applications for cancellation of NBWs

issued against the accused Wasim Ahmed and Babu Khan

alongwith their vakalatnama have been moved. Heard. In view

of the facts and circumstances as mentioned in the applications,

same are allowed subject to fine of Rs. 500/- each and accused

persons are warned to be careful in future.

Put up for date fixed on 31.10.2015.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 250/06PS Geeta Colony07.10.2015

File taken up on the application.Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Both accused in person with ld. counsel Ms. Shashi Bala.

This is an application for cancellation of NBWs

issued against the accused Hakam And Yusuf has been moved.

Heard. In view of the facts and circumstances as mentioned in

the application, same is allowed with the warning to the accused

persons to be careful in future.

Put up for PE on date fixed on 19.11.2015.


07.10.2015


Sh. Z. U. Islam, ld. counsel for applicant.IO ASI Anand Kumar in person.

Status report filed. Same is perused. Accordingly,

application is disposed off.

Application be consigned to record room.


07.10.2015

FIR No. 776/15PS Kalyanpuri07.10.2015

Application is received from the Court of Ld. CMM/East.Present: Ld. APP for the State.

Applicant/owner Nadeem Qureshi in person.IO ASI Shyam Lal in person.Accused Arif in person.

This is an application for release of vehicle i.e Swift Desire car bearing no. UP14BQ-8286 on superdari moved through applicant/owner.

IO has field the reply. Accused has no objection for releasing the abovesaid vehicle to the applicant/owner.

Submission heard. Reply perused and considered.In view of the recent judgment of Hon’ble High Court of

Delhi in the case of Manjeet Singh Vs. State Crl. M.C. 4485/2013 and Crl. M.A No. 16055/2013, the vehicle bearing no. UP14BQ-8286 be released to the applicant on furnishing of indemnity bond/security bond in the sum of Rs. 2,50,000/- (2.5 lakhs) before the SHO/IO of the concerned police station that in case somebody else is found to be rightful claimant/owner of the said property, the applicant would indemnify him.

The SHO/IO is further directed to ascertain and satisfy himself about the ownership of the vehicle in question and also to take the photographs of the case property/vehicle from different angle and its engine number alongwith the negatives duly authenticated and certified and a detailed punchanama be also prepared of the property before such release. It is also directed that the investigating officer shall keep on record the permanent address of the applicant, his identity proof, his address proof as well as his phone number.

It is further directed that the applicant shall join the investigation/trial as and when directed to do so and will also undertake that he will intimate to the Court any address which he may change during the course of time.

Photographs shall be placed on record alongwith the Negative/CD. If the photographs are taken from digital camera, there is no need to place negatives on record.

All these documents shall be filed by the investigating officer alongwith the final report as and when the same is filed. Application is disposed of accordingly.

Application is sent back to the Court of Ld. CMM/East.Copy of this order be given dasti to applicant.

MM/Mahila Court-1 KKD/Delhi 07.10.2015


Accused and his surety in person with ld. counsel Sh. S. K. Jain.

Bail bond has been verified. Accordingly,

application is disposed off.



07.10.2015

v235/12 07.10.2015 present: petitioner in person with ld...

Documents