v1_n1_a2

Upload: obasanya-sheriff

Post on 06-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    1/10

    Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    Email: [email protected]

    External Environment Factors Influencing the Technology Adoption-Diffusion

    Decision in Malaysian Manufacturing Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad* andJohn Douglas Thomson

    Graduate School of Business and Law RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia E-mail: [email protected]

    Graduate School of Business and Law RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

    ABSTRACT

    This paper is based upon an initial study that researches the external environment factors that may influence

    technology adoption decision processes in Malaysian manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises(SMEs).

    The preliminary semi structured interviews were conducted with four managers of Malaysian manufacturing

    companies to obtain their insights of topic. Their experiences and opinions of the external environment

    factors that influence their decisions to adopt new technology into their business operations have been

    gained for further research purposes.

    2011 APBITM Society. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: technology adoption, Malaysian manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), external

    environment factors

    I. Introduction

    The epistemology of technology diffusion and adoption is survival (Okada 2006; Bennet & Bennet,

    2004). Competition and adaptation have been issues for any business entity to survive in the business world.

    To understand the competitive environment of technology adoption decisions by a business entity, it is

    necessary to look into the external factors that may influence the technology adoption decision.

    Abdullah (2002) stated that one of the important issues in Malaysias economic growth is technology

    adoption among Malaysian Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) to enable them to be more competitive

    and survive in the global business environment. Kuan & Chau (2001) agreed that on SMEs abilities to

    utilize technology can render it competitive and sustainable. Realizing the importance of technology

    diffusion, the Malaysian Government has attempted to ensure the adoption of technologies which will

    Contents lists available atProBITM

    Progress in Business Innovation & Technology

    Management

    APBITMS Homepage: http://apbitm.org

    http://www.cibit.url.tw/APBITM%28New%29/journal-progress.htmhttp://www.cibit.url.tw/APBITM%28New%29/journal-progress.htmhttp://www.cibit.url.tw/APBITM%28New%29/journal-progress.htmhttp://www.cibit.url.tw/APBITM%28New%29/journal-progress.htm
  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    2/10

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad, John Douglas Thomson /Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    14

    contribute efficiently and effectively towards the development of competitive Malaysian industries (The

    Ninth Malaysian Plan, 2006).

    However, Malaysian Government technology policy continues to focus mainly on encouraging

    innovation and not on the diffusion of technology. Such policy leads to too little adoption of technology

    (Rosnah, Lo & Hashmi, 2005). Malaysian manufacturing SMEs are aware of the potential benefits ofmanufacturing technologies. Unfortunately, these manufacturing companies lack of understanding of

    specific ways in which technology can help their businesses (Rosnah, Megat & Osman, 2004).

    Moreover, Zaya (2005) found that although manufacturing companies are aware of a wide range of

    technologies, they only make use of a few of them. The argument is strengthened by Asgari & Wong (2007)

    who identified that one of the barriers to industrialization is the lack of technology adoption by industry.

    This research is concerned with industrial manufacturing technology used by Malaysian manufacturing

    companies. In particular, industrial manufacturing technologies which includes machinery and equipment in

    production operations. Industrial manufacturing technology can be the catalyst for Malaysia to become a

    high-tech nation (The Ninth Malaysian Plan, 2006).

    This research aims to provide an initial understanding of factors that may influence Malaysian

    manufacturing companies technology decision process. For this papers purposes, the researcher is

    examining the organizations external environment factors that influence technology adoption decisions in

    four Malaysian manufacturing companies. Further research will be necessary to obtain thorough data

    coverage of the issue.

    II. Literature review

    2.1 The innovation (technology)-decision process

    According to Rogers (2003), the technology-decision process is the process through which an

    individual (or other decision-making unit) passes from first knowledge of a technology, to forming an

    attitude toward the technology, to a decision to adopt or reject or to implement the new idea, and to confirm

    this decision. Rogers (2003) diffusion of innovation theory consists of five stages in the innovation-decision

    process (Figure 1):

    Figure 1. Model of stages in the innovation-decision process (Rogers, 2003; Damounpor, 1991)

    From Figure 1, it can be seen that (Rogers, 2003, pp. 169):

    1. Knowledge occurs when an individual (or other decision-making unit) is exposed to the innovations

    existence and gains some understanding of how it functions;

  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    3/10

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad, John Douglas Thomson /Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    15

    2. Persuasion (attitude formation) occurs when an individual (or other decision-making unit) forms a

    favorable or unfavorable attitude toward the innovation;

    3. Decision occurs when an individual (or other decision-making unit) engages in activities that lead to

    a choice to adopt or reject the innovation;

    4. Implementation occurs when an individual (or other decision-making unit) puts an innovation to use;and

    5.Confirmation occurs when an individual (or other decision-making unit) seeks reinforcement of an

    innovation-decision already made, but he or she may reverse this previous decision if exposed to conflicting

    messages about the innovation.

    These stages were summarized into two phases by Damanpour (1991):

    1. Initiation; and

    2. Implementation.

    In the first phase, initiation, the firm considers the need to introduce the innovation, it researches for

    information, training is carried out, resources are proposed, the process is evaluated and finally the decision

    to adopt the innovation is made. In the second phase, implementation, first use of the innovation is made,

    and subsequently organizational routines are modified appropriately.

    Premkumar and Roberts (1999) consider five phases in the adoption process, which are similar to

    Rogers technology-decision process. There consist of:

    1. Awareness;

    2. Persuasion;

    3. Decision;

    4. Implementation; and

    5. Confirmation.

    Coombs, Saviotti & Walsh (1987) suggest that the term diffusion relates to the level of adoption of

    innovation. Adoption has also been considered as part of the diffusion process and a measure of its success

    (Albors, Hervas & Hidalgo, 2006).

    According to Ayres (1969), diffusion of a new technology is the evolutionary process of replacement of

    an old technology by a newer one. Organizations that do not accept new technologies and do not alter

    themselves to accept the new technologies will fall behind (Davidoff & Kleiner, 1991).

    Rogers (1962) diffusion of innovation theory provides the initial foundation for this research.

    2.2 External environment factors

    The fundamental approach to study the adoption and diffusion of new technologies is the diffusion of

    innovations theory (Rogers, 2003). The literature on adoption and diffusion of innovations has mostly

    focused on the factors affecting adoption and diffusion. One of the factors that affect technology adoption

    and diffusion includes the environment context (Scupola, 2003; Tonartzky and Fleischer, 1990). The

    environment context includes the external actors and factors that affect a companys decision to adopt a

    technology, either directly or indirectly. These may include customers, competitors, market, government or

    economy. The external environment comprises the industry (suppliers and customers), the competitors, and

  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    4/10

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad, John Douglas Thomson /Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    16

    dealing with regulatory bodies such as the government (Tonartzky and Fleischer, 1990). Scupola (2003)

    stressed that the competitors, the suppliers and the customers can exert direct or indirect pressures on SMEs

    to adopt new technology.

    A summary of the external factors mentioned in the literature that affect technology adoption in

    companies is shown in Table 1.

    Table 1. External factors affect technology adoption

    External factors

    Burca, Fyner and Marshall (2005) Customer demand

    Supplier perspective

    Kim and Galliers (2004)

    Santarelly and Daltri (2003)

    Business environment

    Global markets

    Dynamic market

    Scupola (2003) Competitors

    Suppliers

    Customers

    Sadowski, Maitland, Van Dongen (2002) Competitive pressure

    External support

    Incentives

    Chengalur-Smith, Duchessi (1999) Market condition

    Competitors

    Among the external factors relating to technology adoption, the researcher has found the following are

    common:

    customer demand; competitors; supplier perspective; dynamic market;

    government support; and Government regulation.

    III. Methodology

    The data for this study was collected through semi-structured interviews to facilitate participants

    ability to express their viewpoints more openly than may be the case with more structured interview

    situations (Flick, 1998).

    The participants were first approached by email to get their permission to interview them and set the

    interview date. The participants who agreed to participate in the interview were contacted via telephone to

    confirm their participation. The researcher visited the selected companies in Malaysia and interviewed the

  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    5/10

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad, John Douglas Thomson /Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    17

    decision maker of each company to get an initial idea and data for further research. The interviews were

    conducted face to face and digitally recorded. Prior to the interview session, the study was outlined more

    formally, confidentially, anonymity confirmed and gave participants freedom to choose not to answer any

    question. The participants then signed a consent form and gave permission for the interview to be digitally

    recorded. Each interview lasted approximately 40 minutes.From the interview data, the researcher transcribed the digitally recorded interviews. In order to

    facilitate a data analysis, the researcher used the following process: reading through the transcription and

    examining all data (review data); coding the data; looking for themes and sub-themes (search and extraction);

    interrelating themes and description; and interpreting the meaning of the themes and descriptions

    (summarization)

    IV. Results

    4.1 Interviewee position and role on technology decision

    The interviewees were asked about their position in the company (Table 2). They also were asked about

    their role regarding making technology decisions in their company. It is important to ensure their

    knowledge of technology and their authority in technology decision making.

    Table 2. The role of the interviewee in the company regarding technology decision making

    People Position Responsibility regarding technology

    Mr. A Project Manager decides on certain company project and technology

    to use for the project

    Mr. B Operations Director decides what technology to be adopt for companys

    operations

    Mrs. C Managing Director makes decisions on technology after discussions

    with the Executive Vice President of the company

    Mr. D Manager decides what technology or equipment is to be used

    in the company

    4.2 Companies profile

    Company one (C1) is a medium sized electronics based manufacturing company. C1 is a well

    established supplier of security and convenience products to some of the worlds major retail and wholesale

    companies. C1 offers specialized design, manufacturing, marketing, logistics and customer service.

    Company two (C2) is a Malaysian-based medium sized electronic manufacturing company. C2

    operations include grinding, slicing, lapping and polishing processes. C2 also offers value added contract

    manufacturing and engineering services to clients across multiple industries.

    Company three (C3) is a small sized oil and gas equipment manufacturing company. C3 specializes in

    alternative technology solutions for its clients, leveraging on their network of business alliances to achievemaximum exposure to a technology and integrating the available products, services and resources to

  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    6/10

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad, John Douglas Thomson /Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    18

    optimize the solution to its clients requirements.

    Company four (C4) is small sized food based manufacturing company. C4 manufactures ice products

    (ice block and ice cube) for both business and household purposes. C4 prides itself in its technological

    competence in manufacturing ice products.

    4.3 External factors that influence technology adoption and diffusion

    A number of themes emerged consistently. The data has been organized into these themes. The

    themes are discussed in an order suggested by the intensity with which participants explored them.

    4.3.1 Customer

    All the participants in the interview perceived that competitors influence their decision when adopting

    technology into their company. Demand from customers influenced them to look into new product

    development and operations which influenced them to adopt a new technology into their operations. One of

    the participants (C4) stated that, I always look into the pattern of our customer. If the customer needs a new

    product from us, I will consider investing into new operations and new technology.

    Other participants (C1 and C3) agreed that customers influenced their technology decisions, We have

    to consider the demand of the customer as well. If customer demand is less, then theres no point in adopting

    new technology into our operations..We have to consider customer expectations and customer demand.

    Demand from the customer gives effect for company (C3) to make a decision to develop a new product and

    eventually to adopt a new technology into their operations, So, I would say the requirement has to be there,

    the demand has got to be there. Creating the demand has to be there too.

    4.3.2 Competitors

    Malaysian manufacturing SMEs would like to be both different and competitive in the global

    marketplace. In order to be successful in their marketplace, Malaysian manufacturing SMEs should give

    some attention to their competitors. C2 mentioned that There is also the concern of the competitors. We

    have concern of competitors especially the Chinese manufacturers. One of the ways to be different is to

    strengthen operations and catch up with new technology. We always make sure that we are competitive in

    the market by making sure our technology produces products that competitive in the market, C4.

    Companies always strive hard to raise their competitive advantages by adopting new technology.

    4.3.3 Malaysian Government regulation

    All four companies agree that Malaysian Government regulation does not affect their decision to adopt

    a new technology into their operations. Malaysian government regulation on technology does not give

    much impact on our company.

    C1 mentioned that, So far we dont face any problems with regulation because we dont have a direct

    relation with the Malaysian Government since we are a private institution. We are 100% privately owned. So,

    there is no direct link to the government fund. This is agreed by C3 who pointed out that Malaysian

    regulation regarding technology is actually no hamper to any technology transfer or adopting decision.

  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    7/10

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad, John Douglas Thomson /Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    19

    4.3.4 Economy

    From the findings, there are similar perspectives from the participants about the influence of the

    economy on their technology decision adoption. One of the participants said:

    C1: Economy, yes it will affect our production as well. From this Global Financial Crisis downturnover the last one or two years, our production is down. So, we definitely dont want to spend on adopting

    new technology into our operation during that period.

    This is also agreed by C2, So, I guess external factors - for sure economy would be one thing. C4

    confirmed that Economy crisis does impact our operation. This shows that Malaysian manufacturing

    SMEs see that the ups and downs in national economy will bring pressure onto their technology adoption

    decision processes.

    However, only one participant mentioned that the economy did not really affect their business operation

    and did not influence their decision to adopt new technology into their company. He said that:

    C3: The recent economic crisis, we are not badly affected. Our operation is still operating as usual.

    V. Discussion

    Malaysian manufacturing SMEs always strive hard to be competitive and survive in the business world.

    In order to survive in the business world, Malaysian manufacturing SMEs have to adapt to the rapid changes

    in the business environment including adopting new technology to improve their operations. Previous study

    suggests external environment factors could influence the technology adoption decision process (Burca,

    Fyner and Marshall, 2005; Sadowski, Maitland, Van Dongen, 2002; Scupola, 2003; Tonartzky and Fleischer,

    1990).

    The initial interviews with four Malaysian manufacturing SMEs attempted to find the external factors

    that may influence adoption of industrial manufacturing technology in Malaysian manufacturing companies.

    The information obtained from this research found that external environment factors influence Malaysian

    manufacturing SMEs technology adoption and diffusion.

    The results of this study show that Malaysian manufacturing SMEs find there are four principal

    external environment factors that may influence their decisions to adopt a new technology into their business

    operations. The four external environment factors relating to technology adoption are:

    customers; competitors, Malaysian Government regulations; and economy.The results of this research indicated that all factors in the external environment factors are important to

    take into account. These factors have a noticeable impact on the decision to adopt new technology in the

    manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia. They also show that external environment factors are important and may

    influence Malaysian manufacturing SMEs decisions to adopt new technology into their companies.From this analysis and based on the literature study, the conceptual framework of external environment

  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    8/10

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad, John Douglas Thomson /Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    20

    factors that may influence the technology adoption process in Malaysian manufacturing technologies is

    shown in Figure 2. The initial findings of these factors are expected to assist the researchers in the next

    phase.

    Figure 2. Conceptual framework (Authors, 2010)

    Consequently, the conceptual framework in this paper provides one of the elements for the model of

    industrial manufacturing technology adoption-diffusion in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. It is expected to

    facilitate Malaysian manufacturing decision makers to consider and plan potential adoption of industrial

    manufacturing technologies. This research is anticipated to provide further support for the innovation

    decision process model developed by Rogers (2003).

    VI. Conclusion

    In conclusion, the research found that while diffusion of innovation research is supported in Malaysia,

    external factors should be included as principal determinants of technology adoption. Malaysian

    manufacturing companies should comprehensively understand external environment factors before making

    decisions on technology adoption. Furthermore, the Malaysian Government should consider these factorswhen giving assistance to Malaysian manufacturing companies regarding technology adoption.

    VII. Directions for future study

    Future research and discussion will be conducted to explore thoroughly the factors that facilitate or hinder

    technology adoption and diffusion. The researcher may also look into other innovation diffusion and

    adoption models such as Technology Adoption Model (Davis, 1989), Interessement (Akrich, Callon&

    Latour, 2002) and others. Further research will expand upon this study, investigating the related internal and

    external factors, additional organizations across a range of industry sector categories and use quantitative

    techniques to validate all factors.

    EXTERNAL FACTORS

    Customer Competitors Economy MalaysianGovernmentregulation

    Innovation (Technology)

    decision process in Malaysian

    manufacturing companies

  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    9/10

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad, John Douglas Thomson /Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    21

    References

    Abdullah, M.A. (2002) An overview of the macroeconomic contribution of SMEs in Malaysia in Harie C

    & Lee BC eds. The role of SMEs: National economics in East Asia series 2. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Akrich, M., Callon M., Latour, B. (2002) The key to success in innovation. Part I: The art of intersessement.International Journal of Innovation Management 6(2), 187-206.

    Gentili, G. B., Tesi, V., Linari, M., Marsili, M. (2002) A versatile microwave plethysmograph for the

    monitoring of physiological parameters (Periodical style). IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49(10), 120410.

    Albors, J., Hervas, J., Hidalgo, A. (2006) Analyzing high technology diffusion and public transference

    program: the case of the European game program. The Journal of Technology Technology Transfer

    31(6), 647-61.

    Asgari, B., Wong, C.Y. (2007) Decipting the technology and economic development of modern Malaysia.

    Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 15(1), 167-93.

    Ayres, R. (1969) Technology forecasting and long-range forecasting. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Bennet, A., Bennet, D. (2004) Organizational survival in the new world: the intelligent complex adaptive

    system. Burlington: Butterworth-Heinemann Publication.

    Burca, S., Fynes, B., Marshall, D. (2005) Strategic technology adoption: extending ERP across the supply

    chain. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18(4), 427-40.

    Chengalur-Smith, I., Duchessi, P. (1999) The initiation and adoption of client-server technology in

    organizations. Innovation and Management 35, 77-88.

    Coombs, R., Saviotti, P., Walsh, V. (1987) Economics and technological change. London: MacMillan

    Education Limited.

    Damanpour, F. (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators.

    Academy of Management Journal 34(3), 55-90.

    Davidoff, L., Kleiner, B. (1991) New developments in innovation diffusion. Work Study 40(6), 6-9.

    Davis, F. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information

    technology. MIS Quaterly 13(3), 319-40, 1989.

    Department of the Finance Ministry of Malaysia (2006) Ninth Malaysian Plan, 2006-2010.

    Kim, C., Galliers, R.D. (2004) Towards a diffusion model for internet systems. Internet Research 14(2),

    155-66.Kuan, K.K.Y., Chau, P.Y.K (2001) A Perception-based Model for EDI adoption in small business using a

    Technology-Organization-Environment Framework. Information and Management 38, 507-21.

    Okada, Y. (2006) Struggles for survival: institutional and organizational changes in Japans high-tech

    industries. Japan: Spinger.

    Premkumar, G., Roberts, M. (1999) Adoption of new information technologies in Rural Small Business. The

    International Journal of Management Science 27, 467-84.

    Rogers, E. M. (1962) Diffusion of Innovation, 1sted. New York: The Free Press.

    Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovation, 5th

    ed. New York: The Free Press.

    Rosnah, M., Lo, W., Hashmi (2005) Advanced manufacturing technologies in SMEs. CACCI Journal.

  • 8/3/2019 V1_N1_A2

    10/10

    Murzidah Ahmad Murad, John Douglas Thomson /Progress in Business Innovation & Technology Management 001 (2011) 013-022

    22

    Rosnah, M., Megat A., Osman, M. (2004) Barriers to Advance manufacturing technologies implementation

    in the Small and Medium Scale industries of a developing country. International Journal of Engineering

    and Technology 1(1), 39-46.

    Sadowski, B. M., Maitland C., Dongen J. (2002) Strategic use of the Internet by small and medioum sized

    companies: an exploratory study. Information economics and policy 14, 75-93.Santarelly, E., DAltri, S. (2003) The diffusion of e-commerce among SMEs: theoretical implications and

    empirical evidence. Small Business Economics 21, 273-83.

    Scupola, A. (2003) The adoption of Internet Commerce by SMEs in the South of Italy: an environment,

    technological and organizational perspective. Journal of Global Information Technology Management

    6(1), 52-71.

    Torrnatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M. (1990) The processes of technological innovation. Lexington MA:

    Lexington books.

    Zaya, P. (2005) Technology adoption SMEs. International Development Research Centre.