v m s ss m l -1 ( ) v ds nnnedn vs iasi noise at spectral resolution: nedn is estimated using sdl...

1
Vladimir Zavyalov, Mark Esplin, Mark Greenman, Deron Scott, Ben Esplin, Brandon Graham, Charles Major, and Kevin Grant. CrIS on NPP: Instrument status and first glance on the instrument in-flight performance. The Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) is part of the Cross-track Infrared and Microwave Sounding Suite (CrIMSS) instrument suite that will be used to produce accurate temperature, water vapor, and pressure profiles on the NPOESS Preparatory Project (NPP) mission and upcoming Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) operational missions. The NPP satellite has been launched on the October 28, 2011. Summary: CrIS instrument on-orbit performance is excellent and stable Instrument noise is very low and stable Preliminary results confirmed CrIS excellent spectral calibration Early sensor checkup and validation has been completed Intensive calibration activities is in process to upload Calibration Table (EP #33) based on the on-orbit optimized parameters Careful, in-depth coordination of CrIS SDR and CrIMSS EDR teams and software/tools is critical to timely and accurate post-launch validation. In development and testing for intensive Cal/Val activities: Cal/Val tools and procedures Key Technical aspects of CrIS: Fourier Transform Spectrometer Spectral Range 650 to 2550 cm- 1 Spectral resolution: SWIR 2.5 cm -1 MWIR 1.25 cm -1 LWIR 0.625 cm -1 14 km nadir FOV spatial resolution Fields of Regard 3x3 FOVs Photovoltaic detectors in 3 bands 4-stage Passive Detector Cooler On-board calibration target ICT CrIS acceptance testing: Supplier: Exelis/ITT CrIS FM1 has completed Thermal Vacuum testing: Vibration & EMI tests FOV Shape / Coregistration Spectral Accuracy / ILS NEDN Radiometric uncertainty Linearity testing and correction Short Term Repeatability Long Term Repeatability Integration on S/ C and TVAC test. CrIS AIRS IASI CrIS follows two great, well calibrated instruments SDR Cal/Val has/will utilize similar procedures Co-existence enables direct comparison from GSICS Cal/Val team brings direct AIRS/IASI experience Cal/Val Activities are underway: CrIS full spectral resolution test, February 22,2012 : CrIS SDR Cal/Val plan is a joint effort of industry and government team: Plan incorporates a comprehensive list of SDR tasks Instrument on-orbit operating procedures Cal/Val tools On-orbit characterization and SDR algorithm updates Team members linked by Internet and teleconferencing links System was tested during TVAC and pre-launch exercises Cal/Val tem members have extensive experience working with AIRS and IASI Tagged Tagged 0 1 L [r.u.] Metrology Wavelength Monitoring Compute Spectrum ES (88%) Scene FCE Handling Lunar Intrusion ) ( ~ L ) ( ~ x I Linearity Correction Calibration FCE Handling Calibration FCE Handling Moving Average Moving Average ds S ~ Imaginary Part Removal Process Calibration References Linearity Correction Linearity Correction ) ( L ] [ ~ n S es ] [ ~ n S ds ] [ ~ n S ict 30 ma N 30 ma N ) ( L NEdN Radiometric Calibration & NEdN Estimates L [r.u.] DS (6%) ICT (6%) ) ( ~ S mean cold reference mean hot reference Radiometrically and Spectrally Calibrated Earth Scene ict S ~ Nonlinear spectra Linearized Spectra Tagged DS, ICT, ES ) ( ~ S ) ( ~ S Spectrum Correction Post Cal Filter Spectral Resampling ILS Correction User Defined Apodization SDR calibration process: CrIS Level 0 to Level 1C processing is provided by the Sensor Data Record (SDR) process: SDR algorithm was developed by ITT in parallel with the sensor testing SDR performance was validated by using the SDR software to process synthetic, proxy, and TVAC data SDR process has been updated to correct non-linearity and compensate for ICT emissivity On-orbit data collections addressed non-linearity, absolute radiometric and spectral calibration First spectra and images from CrIS: CrIS NEdT vs AIRS and IASI at native instrument resolution (T=270K): CrIS has smaller noise levels than AIRS and IASI NEdT performance exceeds spec even at full spectral resolution in MWIR and SWIR spectral bands CrIS NEdN vs IASI noise at CrIS spectral resolution: NEdN is estimated using SDL PCA approach with 30 PCs CrIS exhibits smaller noise level in LWIR (~x3.5) and SWIR (~x3) spectral bands than noise estimated from IASI observations reduced to CrIS spectral resolution Overall CrIS noise performance is outstanding (well below spec) NEdN of MWIR FOV7 is out of family as it was during TVAC4 and S/C ground tests During ground tests analogues outages were observed in MWIR band for several FOVs: MWIR FOV2 (TVAC3) and MWIR FOV7 (TVAC4, S/C TVAC) Root cause: detector diode material changes with warmup-cooldown cycles NEdN estimated from Earth view (PCA approach), ICT, and DS targets agree very well CrIS instrument noise is very stable during two months on orbit CrIS on-orbit check-out and calibration activities: NEdN performance during ground TVAC3 and S/C TVAC testing: 1000 1500 2000 2500 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 Wavenumber (cm -1 ) Radiance (mW/m 2 sr cm -1 ) NEdN TVAC3 MN Side1 287K Operational, T ECT = 287 K FOV1 FOV2 FOV3 FOV4 FOV5 FOV6 FOV7 FOV8 FOV9 Spec 287K 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 Wavenumber (cm -1 ) Radiance (mW/m 2 sr cm -1 ) NEdN T ECT = 287 K FOV1 FOV2 FOV3 FOV4 FOV5 FOV6 FOV7 FOV8 FOV9 Spec 287K TVAC3 Mission nominal S/C TVAC4 cold plateau CrIS sensor overview: ±50° Cross track Scans RDR = Raw Data Record SDR = Sensor Data Record EDR = Environmental Data Record EDR Algorithms Decode Spacecraft Data SDR Algorithms • CrIS • ATMS 3x3 Array of CrIS FOVs (Each at 14-km Diameter) Central or Regional Ground Stations SDRs RDRs 0.1 1 10 100 1000 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 Temperature (K) Pressure (mb) EDRs Co-located ATMS SDRs ATMS CrIS End of outgassing and release Cooler Door - 01/18/12 IM power up to nominal mode - 01/18/12 Signal processor Power up, Orbit 1194 - 01/20/12 PGA gain adjustment - 01/21-26/12 Optical ZPD offset adjustment - 01/23/12 Bias tilt optimization - 01/23/12 Bit trim mask optimization - 01/23/12 Bit trim and impulse noise adjustment - 01/30/12 Bit trim mask update - 02/06/12 Spectral calibration, Ne-lamp check - 01/08-09/12 Linearity check - 01/08-09/12 Preliminary Cal table upload (EP V. 32) - 01/31/12 NEdN check - 02/09/12 Full resolution data acquisition - 02/22/12 Nonlinearity coefficient setting (a2, Vinst) - “Golden day” “Golden days” - 02/24-26/12 Updated Cal table upload (EP V. 33) - 03/23/12 Instrument noise: NEdN/NEdT vs. IASI and AIRS 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 Wavenumber (cm -1 ) Radiance (mW/m 2 sr cm -1 ) CrIS Spec. IASI Original IASI - CrIS Res. CrIS On-Orbit CrIS On-Orbit Full Res AIRS - CrIS Res. 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 10 -1 10 0 Wavenumber (cm -1 ) CrIS Spec. IASI Original IASI - CrIS Res. CrIS On-Orbit CrIS On-Orbit Full Res AIRS - CrIS Res. NEdT, 0 K On-obit CrIS noise performance was estimated using ICT and DS targets: 1000 1500 2000 2500 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 0 Wavenumber (cm -1 ) Radiance (mW/m 2 sr cm -1 ) NEdN (Radiances) Using Standard Deviation FOV 1 FOV 2 FOV 3 FOV 4 FOV 5 FOV 6 FOV 7 FOV 8 FOV 9 Spec 287K ICT DS NEdN trend: January-February 2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 2550 10 -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 Wavenumber (cm -1 ) Radiance (mW/m 2 sr cm -1 ) Correlated NEdN - FOV 3 T ECT = 287 K NEdN RMS Error(1 PC) Corr NEdN Spec 287K DS SWIR correlated noise contribution DS SWIR is most sensitive to the potential vibration causing correlated noise No contribution of correlated noise is seen Instrument noise is very stable NEdN was averaged over all FOVs and over spectral regions: LWIR: 650-750 ; 750-900; and 750-195 cm -1 MWIR: Entire band 1210-1750 cm -1 SWIR: Entire band 2155-2550 cm - Bit trim mask optimization LWIR SWIR Sun Glint Induced Saturated interferograms on February 10,2012 CrIS SWIR 2522 cm-1 VIIRS view of the same scene 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 Wavenumber (cm -1 ) LW, MW, SW Brightness Temperature (K) FOV1 FOV2 FOV3 FOV4 FOV5 FOV6 FOV7 FOV8 FOV9 Orbit 1194, January 20, 2012 NOAA/STAR: “Golden Day” February 24, 2012 Real part of the spectra 900cm-1 Imaginary part of the spectra 900cm-1 NOAA/STAR: Double difference between CrIS and IASI , February 25, 2012 FOV5 FOV5 Calibrated spectra in ”hot” and “cold” spots: NEdN estimated from Earth Scene data using PCA technique Full resolution, 02/22/12 Standard resolution , 02/21/12 Full resolution NEdN is larger in MWIR (~x1.5) and SWIR (~x2) bands as expected LW 700 −1 MW 1386.25 −1 SW 2550 −1 On-orbit Operational SDR algorithm validation. BT differences between science and operational codes. Scene temperature ~ 300K Scene temperature ~ 250K Full resolution data collection was successful Full resolution test has shown that CrIS is fully capable to provide full resolution data at 0.625cm -1 resolution in all spectral bands Expected full resolution in MWIR and SWIR spectral bands was seen No significant problems were observed during this test Operational processing of full resolution data could be implemented

Upload: others

Post on 07-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: V m S SS m L -1 ( ) V ds nnNEdN vs IASI noise at spectral resolution: NEdN is estimated using SDL PCA approach with 30 PCs CrIS exhibits smaller noise level in LWIR (~x3.5) and SWIR

Vladimir Zavyalov, Mark Esplin, Mark Greenman, Deron Scott, Ben Esplin, Brandon Graham, Charles Major, and Kevin Grant.

CrIS on NPP: Instrument status and

first glance on the instrument in-flight performance.

The Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) is part of the Cross-track Infrared and Microwave

Sounding Suite (CrIMSS) instrument suite that will be used to produce accurate

temperature, water vapor, and pressure profiles on the NPOESS Preparatory Project

(NPP) mission and upcoming Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) operational missions.

The NPP satellite has been launched on the October 28, 2011.

Summary:

CrIS instrument on-orbit performance is excellent and stable

Instrument noise is very low and stable

Preliminary results confirmed CrIS excellent spectral calibration

Early sensor checkup and validation has been completed

Intensive calibration activities is in process to upload Calibration

Table (EP #33) based on the on-orbit optimized parameters

Careful, in-depth coordination of CrIS SDR and CrIMSS EDR

teams and software/tools is critical to timely and accurate

post-launch validation.

In development and testing for intensive Cal/Val activities:

Cal/Val tools and procedures

Key Technical aspects of CrIS:

Fourier Transform Spectrometer

Spectral Range 650 to 2550 cm-1

Spectral resolution:

SWIR 2.5 cm-1

MWIR 1.25 cm-1

LWIR 0.625 cm-1

14 km nadir FOV spatial resolution

Fields of Regard 3x3 FOVs

Photovoltaic detectors in 3 bands

4-stage Passive Detector Cooler

On-board calibration target ICT

CrIS acceptance testing:

Supplier: Exelis/ITT

CrIS FM1 has completed Thermal Vacuum testing:

Vibration & EMI tests

FOV Shape / Coregistration

Spectral Accuracy / ILS

NEDN

Radiometric uncertainty

Linearity testing and correction

Short Term Repeatability

Long Term Repeatability

Integration on S/ C and TVAC test.

CrIS

AIRS IASI

CrIS follows two great, well calibrated instruments

SDR Cal/Val has/will utilize similar procedures

Co-existence enables direct comparison from GSICS

Cal/Val team brings direct AIRS/IASI experience

Cal/Val Activities are underway:

CrIS full spectral resolution test, February 22,2012 :

CrIS SDR Cal/Val plan is a joint effort of industry and government team: Plan incorporates a comprehensive list of SDR tasks

Instrument on-orbit operating procedures

Cal/Val tools

On-orbit characterization and SDR algorithm updates

Team members linked by Internet and teleconferencing links

System was tested during TVAC and pre-launch exercises

Cal/Val tem members have extensive experience working with AIRS and IASI

Calibrate Spectra

0 1

L [

r.u.

]

Metrology

Wavelength

Monitoring

Compute

Spectrum

ES (88%) Scene

FCE

Handling

Lunar

Intrusion)(

~L)(

~xI

Linearity

Correction

Calibration

FCE

Handling

Calibration

FCE

Handling

Moving

Average

Moving

Average

dsS~

Imaginary

Part Removal

Process Calibration References

Linearity

Correction

Linearity

Correction

)(L

][~

nSes

][~

nSds

][~

nSict

30maN

30maN

)(L

NEdN

Radiometric

Calibration &

NEdN Estimates

L [

r.u.

]

DS (6%)

ICT (6%)

)(~S

mean cold

reference

mean hot

reference

Radiometrically and Spectrally

Calibrated Earth Scene

ictS~

Nonlinear

spectra

Linearized

Spectra

Tagged

DS, ICT, ES

)(~S

)(~S

Spectrum Correction

Post Cal Filter

Spectral

Resampling

ILS Correction

User Defined

Apodization

Calibrate Spectra

0 1

L [

r.u.

]

Metrology

Wavelength

Monitoring

Compute

Spectrum

ES (88%) Scene

FCE

Handling

Lunar

Intrusion)(

~L)(

~xI

Linearity

Correction

Calibration

FCE

Handling

Calibration

FCE

Handling

Moving

Average

Moving

Average

dsS~

Imaginary

Part Removal

Process Calibration References

Linearity

Correction

Linearity

Correction

)(L

][~

nSes

][~

nSds

][~

nSict

30maN

30maN

)(L

NEdN

Radiometric

Calibration &

NEdN Estimates

L [

r.u.

]

DS (6%)

ICT (6%)

)(~S

mean cold

reference

mean hot

reference

Radiometrically and Spectrally

Calibrated Earth Scene

ictS~

Nonlinear

spectra

Linearized

Spectra

Tagged

DS, ICT, ES

)(~S

)(~S

Spectrum Correction

Post Cal Filter

Spectral

Resampling

ILS Correction

User Defined

Apodization

Calibrate Spectra

0 1

L [

r.u.

]

Metrology

Wavelength

Monitoring

Compute

Spectrum

ES (88%) Scene

FCE

Handling

Lunar

Intrusion)(

~L)(

~xI

Linearity

Correction

Calibration

FCE

Handling

Calibration

FCE

Handling

Moving

Average

Moving

Average

dsS~

Imaginary

Part Removal

Process Calibration References

Linearity

Correction

Linearity

Correction

)(L

][~

nSes

][~

nSds

][~

nSict

30maN

30maN

)(L

NEdN

Radiometric

Calibration &

NEdN Estimates

L [

r.u.

]

DS (6%)

ICT (6%)

)(~S

mean cold

reference

mean hot

reference

Radiometrically and Spectrally

Calibrated Earth Scene

ictS~

Nonlinear

spectra

Linearized

Spectra

Tagged

DS, ICT, ES

)(~S

)(~S

Spectrum Correction

Post Cal Filter

Spectral

Resampling

ILS Correction

User Defined

Apodization

SDR calibration process:

CrIS Level 0 to Level 1C processing is provided by the Sensor Data Record (SDR) process: • SDR algorithm was developed by ITT in parallel with the sensor testing • SDR performance was validated by using the SDR software to process synthetic, proxy, and TVAC data • SDR process has been updated to correct non-linearity and compensate for ICT emissivity • On-orbit data collections addressed non-linearity, absolute radiometric and spectral calibration

First spectra and images from CrIS:

CrIS NEdT vs AIRS and IASI at native instrument

resolution (T=270K):

CrIS has smaller noise levels than AIRS and IASI

NEdT performance exceeds spec even at full spectral

resolution in MWIR and SWIR spectral bands

CrIS NEdN vs IASI noise at CrIS spectral resolution:

NEdN is estimated using SDL PCA approach with 30 PCs

CrIS exhibits smaller noise level in LWIR (~x3.5) and

SWIR (~x3) spectral bands than noise estimated from IASI

observations reduced to CrIS spectral resolution

Overall CrIS noise performance is outstanding (well below spec)

NEdN of MWIR FOV7 is out of family as it was during TVAC4 and S/C ground tests

During ground tests analogues outages were observed in MWIR band for several FOVs:

MWIR FOV2 (TVAC3) and MWIR FOV7 (TVAC4, S/C TVAC)

Root cause: detector diode material changes with warmup-cooldown cycles

NEdN estimated from Earth view (PCA approach), ICT, and DS targets agree very well

CrIS instrument noise is very stable during two months on orbit

CrIS on-orbit check-out and calibration activities:

NEdN performance during ground TVAC3 and S/C TVAC testing:

1000 1500 2000 250010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

Wavenumber (cm-1)

Rad

ian

ce (

mW

/m2 s

r cm

-1)

NEdNTVAC3 MN Side1 287K Operational, T

ECT = 287 K

FOV1

FOV2

FOV3

FOV4

FOV5

FOV6

FOV7

FOV8

FOV9

Spec 287K

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 260010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

Wavenumber (cm-1)

Rad

ian

ce (

mW

/m2 s

r c

m-1

)

NEdNT

ECT = 287 K

FOV1

FOV2

FOV3

FOV4

FOV5

FOV6

FOV7

FOV8

FOV9

Spec 287K

TVAC3 Mission nominal S/C TVAC4 cold plateau

CrIS sensor overview:

±50° Cross track

Scans

RDR = Raw Data Record

SDR = Sensor Data Record

EDR = Environmental Data

Record

EDR

Algorithms

Decode

Spacecraft

Data

SDR

Algorithms

• CrIS

• ATMS

3x3 Array of CrIS FOVs

(Each at

14-km Diameter)

Central or

Regional Ground

Stations

SDRs

RDRs

0.1

1

10

100

1000

200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290

Temperature (K)

Pre

ss

ure

(m

b)

EDRs

Co-located

ATMS SDRs

ATMS CrIS

End of outgassing and release Cooler Door - 01/18/12

IM power up to nominal mode - 01/18/12

Signal processor Power up, Orbit 1194 - 01/20/12

PGA gain adjustment - 01/21-26/12

Optical ZPD offset adjustment - 01/23/12

Bias tilt optimization - 01/23/12

Bit trim mask optimization - 01/23/12

Bit trim and impulse noise adjustment - 01/30/12

Bit trim mask update - 02/06/12

Spectral calibration, Ne-lamp check - 01/08-09/12

Linearity check - 01/08-09/12

Preliminary Cal table upload (EP V. 32) - 01/31/12

NEdN check - 02/09/12

Full resolution data acquisition - 02/22/12

Non—linearity coefficient setting (a2, Vinst) - “Golden day”

“Golden days” - 02/24-26/12

Updated Cal table upload (EP V. 33) - 03/23/12

Instrument noise: NEdN/NEdT vs. IASI and AIRS

600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800

10-2

10-1

100

Wavenumber (cm-1

)

Rad

ian

ce (

mW

/m2 s

r cm

-1)

CrIS Spec.

IASI Original

IASI - CrIS Res.

CrIS On-Orbit

CrIS On-Orbit Full Res

AIRS - CrIS Res.

800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600

10-1

100

Wavenumber (cm-1

)

Rad

ian

ce (

mW

/m2 s

r cm

-1)

CrIS Spec.

IASI Original

IASI - CrIS Res.

CrIS On-Orbit

CrIS On-Orbit Full Res

AIRS - CrIS Res.

NE

dT,

0K

On-obit CrIS noise performance was estimated using ICT and DS targets:

1000 1500 2000 250010

-3

10-2

10-1

100

Wavenumber (cm-1)

Rad

ian

ce (

mW

/m2 s

r cm

-1)

NEdN (Radiances) Using Standard Deviation

FOV 1

FOV 2

FOV 3

FOV 4

FOV 5

FOV 6

FOV 7

FOV 8

FOV 9

Spec 287K

ICT DS

NEdN trend: January-February

2150 2200 2250 2300 2350 2400 2450 2500 255010

-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

Wavenumber (cm-1)

Rad

ian

ce (

mW

/m2 s

r cm

-1)

Correlated NEdN - FOV 3T

ECT = 287 K

NEdN

RMS Error(1 PC)

Corr NEdN

Spec 287K

DS SWIR correlated noise contribution

DS SWIR is most sensitive to the potential

vibration causing correlated noise

No contribution of correlated noise is seen

Instrument noise is very stable

NEdN was averaged over all FOVs and over spectral regions:

LWIR: 650-750 ; 750-900; and 750-195 cm-1

MWIR: Entire band 1210-1750 cm-1

SWIR: Entire band 2155-2550 cm-

Bit trim mask optimization

LWIR SWIR

Sun Glint Induced Saturated interferograms on February 10,2012

CrIS SWIR 2522 cm-1 VIIRS view of the same scene

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000180

200

220

240

260

280

300

Wavenumber (cm-1

)

LW, MW, SW

Bri

gh

tness T

em

pera

ture

(K

)

FOV1

FOV2

FOV3

FOV4

FOV5

FOV6

FOV7

FOV8

FOV9

Orbit 1194, January 20, 2012

NOAA/STAR: “Golden Day” February 24, 2012

Real part of the spectra 900cm-1 Imaginary part of the spectra 900cm-1

NOAA/STAR: Double difference between CrIS and IASI , February 25, 2012

FOV5

FOV5

Calibrated spectra in ”hot” and “cold” spots:

NEdN estimated from Earth Scene data using PCA technique

Full resolution, 02/22/12 Standard resolution , 02/21/12

Full resolution NEdN is larger in MWIR (~x1.5) and SWIR (~x2) bands as expected

LW 700 𝑐𝑚−1 MW 1386.25 𝑐𝑚−1 SW 2550 𝑐𝑚−1

On-orbit Operational SDR algorithm validation.

BT differences between science and operational codes.

Scene temperature ~ 300K Scene temperature ~ 250K

Full resolution data collection was successful

Full resolution test has shown that CrIS is fully capable to provide full

resolution data at 0.625cm-1 resolution in all spectral bands

Expected full resolution in MWIR and SWIR spectral bands was seen

No significant problems were observed during this test

Operational processing of full resolution data could be implemented