v. budach – statements on h&n cancer - 1 discussion panel on primary radiochemotherapy volker...
TRANSCRIPT
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 1
Discussion Panel onPrimary Radiochemotherapy
Volker Budach, MD, PhD Head Department
for Radiation OncologyCharité Campus-Mitte
Berlin
Interdisciplinary Workshop on Modern Treatment Options
Statements on Head and Neck CanerFrankfurt, 27-28 of January 2006
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 7
Update of the MACH-NC database focusing on concomitant chemo-radiotherapy.
J Bourhis, C Amand, JP Pignon
on behalf of the Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
(MACH-NC) Collaborative Group
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 8
Purposes • Confirm the magnitude of the benefit of CT on survival
• Validate the effect in concomitant RT-CT because of uncertainties in the MACH-NC-1* due to heterogeneity between trials
• Increase the statistical power to allow subgroup and subset analyses
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, AbstractBourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstract
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 9
Material & Methods
Eligibility criteria
Trials properly randomizedperformed between 1965 and 2000
RLoco-regional treatment
Loco-regional + chemotherapy
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 10
Material and Methods
Data collection and checking
Updated individual data collected for all randomized patients from published and unpublished trials
Extensive checking & validation to ensure
integrity of rando-mization and follow-up in
collaboration with investigators
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 11
Intent to treat analysis
Logrank test stratified by
trial
Survival times used to calculate
relative risk (RR)
Absolute benefit calculated from baseline survival
and RR
Material and Methods
Statistical methods
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 12
24 trials & 5 699 patients
10% in adjuvant 5% in neoadjuvant 85% in concomitant
New randomized trials Included 1994-2000
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 13
87 randomized trials and 16 640 patients
3-arm trials2 x 2 trials
105 comparisons and 17 858 pts
Data analyzedMeta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 14
Chemotherapy timing (n= 17 858)Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy
in Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Adjuvant14%
Neoadjuvant32%
Concomitant54%
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 15
Treatment: Chemotherapy No Chemotherapy
PERCENT
0
5
10
15
19
Oral cav. Oroph. Larynx Hypoph. Others
Site of the primary (n= 17 858)Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy
in Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 16
Stage (UICC 1997) (n= 17 858)Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy
in Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Treatment: Chemotherapy No Chemotherapy
PERCENT
0
10
20
30
40
Stage I-II Stage III Stage IV
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 17
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC Overall SurvivalAll trials (N=17858 patients)
46962389912881837253633424334615889884315727941104157021662917396758558870
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Years
ChemotherapyControl
At risk
p<0.0001
Difference : 5 %
36 %
31 %
332307
Median follow-up = 5.7 years
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 22
Overall survival : Concomitant trialsMeta-Analysis of Chemotherapy
in Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
19% + 3%
19% + 3%
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 23
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC Overall SurvivalConcomitant Trials (N=9615 patients)
2843624816779401312171522313180482424630439453174610161359190829524791
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Years
ChemotherapyControl
At risk
Difference : 8 %
35 %
27 %
p < 0.0001
233186
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 24
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Difference survival rate
Inclusion Hazard ratio
(95% CI) Chemotherapy
effect (p) Heterogeneity
(p) At 2 years
At 5 years
1965-1993 0,82 (0,76 ; 0,88) <0,0001 <0,0001 7,1 % 6,4 %
1994-2000 0,81 (0,76 ; 0,87) <0,0001 0,27 6,6 % 6,6 %
Total 0,81 (0,77 ; 0,86) <0,0001 0,0001 6,8 % 6,5 %
Overall survival : Concomitant trials (n = 9 615)
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 30
Concomitant trials survival by type of local treatmentMeta-Analysis of Chemotherapy
in Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
21% + 7
17% + 3
27% + 5
1% + 13
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.V. Budach, Statements on H&N Cancer 29
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 31
Concomitant trials : effect by type of CTMeta-Analysis of Chemotherapy
in Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
23% + 5
26% + 5
19% + 5
10% + 4
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 33
Concomitant trials: with or without platinMeta-Analysis of Chemotherapy
in Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
23% + 5
20% + 6
26% + 5
11% + 4
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 34
Conclusion
Absolute benefit in concomitant = 8% at 5 years (11% with Cisplatin alone)
Evidence of a higher survival benefit withconcurrent = confirmed
Small benefit of chemotherapy on survival = confirmed (5%)
Benefit of chemotherapy observed in post-op, and with definitive RT (conventional or hyperfractionated)
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 35
Acknowledgments
• Trialists and patients• Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer • Aventis, Sanofi Synthelabo • Institut Gustave-Roussy • Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique
Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapyin Head & Neck Cancer
MACH-NC
Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.Bourhis et al., JCO 2005, Abstr.
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 36
Standard Fractionated Radiotherapy ± Concurrent Chemotherapy
W. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in pressW. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in press
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 37
W. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in pressW. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in press
Standard Fractionated Radiotherapy ± Concurrent Chemotherapy
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 38
Altered Fractionated Radiotherapy ± Concurrent Chemotherapy (same OTT)
W. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in pressW. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in press
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 39
Altered Fractionated Radiotherapy ± Concurrent Chemotherapy (same OTT)
W. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in pressW. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in press
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 40
Altered Fractionated Radiotherapy ± Concurrent Chemotherapy (prolonged OTT)
W. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in press
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 41
Altered Fractionated Radiotherapy ± Concurrent Chemotherapy (prolonged OTT)
W. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in press
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 42
Median Survival Impact of Cytostatic Drugs with Concurrent Chemoradiation
W. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in press
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 45
Chemoradiation vs. Radiotherapy Only studies published after 1992
Reduction of odds ratios
Local control Survival
hyperfract. XRT vs. convent. XRT 0.50 0.60
accelerat. XRT vs. convent. XRT 0.83 0.90*
concurr. CXRT vs. convent. XRT 0.33 0.43
HFX-AF-XRT vs. HFX-AF-XRT + 0.53 0.54
concurr. CHX *= not significant
W. Budach et al., BMC Cancer 2006, in press
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 46
Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinomasof the Oro- und Hypopharynx
Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of
care for inoperable H&N-Cancer !
For patients not amenable for concurrent CXRT,
hyperfractionated XRT is the standard of care!
Conclusions
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 47
Perspectives in Head and Neck Cancer
Potential improvement of the Therapeutic Indexby means of:Optimized Radiotherapy Techniques ““IMRT” = IMRT” = IIntensity-ntensity-MModulated odulated RRadioadioTTherapy for dose herapy for dose
escalation and organs at risk/tissue protectionescalation and organs at risk/tissue protection
Small moleculesSmall molecules EGFR-MoAb (Cetuximab, Erbitux, Gefinitib) Cox-II Inhibitors Bevacuzimab
Cytostatic drugs:
Taxanes (Paclitaxel, Doxetaxel), Gemcitabine, Irinotecan
V. Budach – Statements on H&N Cancer - 48
Optimal combination of chemoradiation with standard or altered fractionation?
Do late effects of chemoradiation compromize the therapeutic benefit (therapeutic ratio )?
Can the addition of „small molecules“ additionally improve chemoradiation results?
Is there a definitive role of surgery (for salvage) after chemoradiation?
Open Questions in the Definitive Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer