uva-dare (digital academic repository) agents, assumptions ... · actors and instruments in...
TRANSCRIPT
UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
Agents, assumptions and motivations behind REDD+
Lovera-Bilderbeek, A.S.E.
Link to publication
LicenseOther
Citation for published version (APA):Lovera-Bilderbeek, A. S. E. (2017). Agents, assumptions and motivations behind REDD+.
General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
Download date: 24 Jan 2021
197
References
Abram, N.K., MacMillan, D. C., Xofis, P., Ancrenaz, M., Tzanopoulos, J., Ong, R., Goossens, B. et
al., 2016. Identifying where REDD+ financially out-competes oil palm in floodplain
landscapes using a fine-scale approach. PLoS ONE 11(6): e0156481, 23pp.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156481.
Acheampong, E., Insaidoo, T.F.G. and Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., 2016. Management of Ghana’s
modified Taungya system: challenges and strategies for improvement. Agroforestry
Systems 90(4), 659-674.
Adekunle, V.A.J., Olagoke, A.O. and Ogundare, L.F., 2010. Logging impacts in tropical lowland
humid forest on tree species diversity and environmental conservation, Journal of
Sustainable Forestry, 29(5), 517-538.
Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C., 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in
natural resource conservation. World Development 27(4): 629-649.
Agrawal, A., 2001. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World
Development 29(10), 1649-1672.
Agrawal, A., 2007. Forests, governance, and sustainability: Common property theory and its
contributions. International Journal of the Commons 1(1), 111-136.
Aguilar, S., 2007. Elements for a robust climate regime post-2012: Options for mitigation. Review
of European Community and International Environmental Law 16(3), 356-367.
Agung Prasetyo, F., Suwarno, A., Purwanto and Hakim, R., 2009. Making policies work for
Payment for Environmental Services (PES): An evaluation of the experience of
formulating conservation policies in districts of Indonesia, Journal of Sustainable Forestry,
28(3-5), 415-433.
Aldy, J.E. and Stavins, R.N., 2012. The promise and problems of pricing carbon: Theory and
experience. Journal of Environment & Development 21(2), 152-180.
Alix-Garcia, J., de Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E. and Torres, J.M., 2005. An Assessment of Mexico’s
Payment for Environmental Services program. University of California at Berkeley, USA
and CIDE for the FAO Comparative Studies Service Agricultural and Development
Economics Division, Rome, Italy. 85 pp.
Allan, J.I. and Dauvergne, P., 2013. The Global South in environmental negotiations: The politics
of coalitions in REDD+, Third World Quarterly 34(8), 1307-1322.
Alter, K.J. and Meunier, S., 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on
Politics 7(1), 13-24.
Almeida, F. and Hatcher, J., 2011. What rights? Measuring the depth of indigenous peoples and
community forest tenure: Preliminary findings from a legal analysis of 33 forest tenure
regimes in 15 countries. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, D.C., USA, 8 pp.
Alvarado, L.X.R. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., 2007. Why are we seeing ‘REDD+’? An analysis of
the international debate on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in
Developing Countries. Analyses. Institut du Développement Durable et des Relations
Internationales, Paris, France, 28 pp.
Andam, K.S., Ferraro, P.J., Pfaff, A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A.A., 2008. Measuring the effectiveness
of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 105(42), 16089-16094.
Andersson, K. and Richards, K.R., 2001. Implementing an international carbon sequestration
program: Can the leaky sink be fixed? Climate Policy 1, 173-188
Andersson, K., Lawrence, D., Zavaleta, J. and Guariguata, M.R., 2015. More trees, more poverty?
The socioeconomic effects of tree plantations in Chile, 2001–2011. Environmental
Management DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0594-x, 14 pp.
Andresen, S., 2007. Key actors in UN environmental governance: Influence, reform and leadership.
International Environmental Agreements 7, 457-468.
198
Angelsen, A. and Kaimowitz, D. (eds) 2001. Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation.
CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 436 pp.
Angelsen, A., 2007. Forest cover change in space and time: Combining the Von Thünen and forest
transition theories. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4117. The World Bank,
Washington, D.C., 43 pp.
Angelsen, A., Peskett, L., Brown, and Luttrell, C., 2008. What is the right scale for REDD+? The
implications of national, subnational and nested Approaches. CIFOR Infobrief no. 15,
CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 6 pp.
Angelsen, A., 2008a. REDD+ models and baselines. International Forestry Review 10(3), 465–275.
Angelsen, A. (ed.), 2008b. Moving ahead with REDD+: Issues, options and implications. CIFOR,
Bogor, Indonesia, 172 pp.
Angelsen, A., Brockhous, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W.D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S.
(eds.) 2009. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. CIFOR, Bogor,
Indonesia, 390 pp.
Angelsen, A., 2009. Incentives to sustain forest ecosystem services: a review and lessons for
REDD+. Natural Resources Issues No. 16. International Institute for Environment and
Development, London, UK with CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia and World Resources Institute,
Washington, D.C., USA, 47 pp.
Angelsen, A., 2010. Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0912014107, 6 pp.
Apgar, M.J., Allen, W., Moore, K. and Ataria, J., 2015. Understanding adaptation and
transformation through indigenous practice: The case of the Guna of Panama. Ecology
and Society 20(1): 45, 11 pp.
Arhin, A.A., 2014. Safeguards and dangerguards: A framework for unpacking the black box of
safeguards for REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics 45, 24-31.
Arriagada, R.A., Sills, E.O., Pattanayak, S.K. and Ferraro, P.J., 2009. Combining qualitative and
quantitative methods to evaluate participation in Costa Rica’s program of payments for
environmental services, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28(3-5), 343-367.
Arts, B., 1998. The political influence of global NGOs. Case Studies on the Climate and
Biodiversity Conventions. International Books, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 300 pp.
Arts, B., 2006. Non-State actors in global environmental governance – new arrangements beyond
the State. In: Koenig-Archibugi, M., Zürn, M. (Eds.), New modes of governance in the
global system – exploring publicness, delegation and inclusiveness. Palgrave Macmillan,
Hampshire, USA, 177-200.
Arts, B. and Buizer, M., 2009. Forests, discourses, institutions. A discursive-institutional analysis of
global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11, 340-347.
Arts, B., Appelstrand, M., Kleinschmit, D., Pulzl, H. and Visseren-Hamakers, I., “Discourses,
actors and instruments in international forest governance”. In: Rayner, J., Buck, A. and
Katila, P. (eds.), 2010. Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international
forest governance. A global assessment report. Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel
on the International Forest Regime. IUFRO World Series Volume 28, Vienna, Austria, 172
pp.
Arts, B. and Visseren-Hamakers, I.J., 2012. Forest governance: Mainstream and critical views.
European Tropical Forest Research Network News 53, 3-10.
Arts, B., 2012. Forests policy analysis and theory use: Overview and trends. Forest Policy and
Economics 16, 7-13.
Asquith, N. M., Vargas Ríos, M. T. and Smith, J., 2002. Can forest- protection carbon projects
improve rural livelihoods? Analysis of the Noel Kempff Mercado climate action project,
Bolivia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7(4), 323-337.
199
Atmadja, S. and Verchot, L., 2012. A review of the state of research, policies and strategies in
addressing leakage from reducing emissionsfrom deforestation and forest degradation
(REDD+). Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17, 311-336.
Aubertin, C., 2015. Deforestation control policies in Brazil: Sovereignty versus the market. Forests,
Trees and Livelihoods 24(3), 147-162.
Auer, M.R., 2000. Who participates in global environmental governance? Partial answers from
international relations theory. Policy Sciences 33(2), 155-180.
Aukland, L., Moura Costa, P. and Brown, S. 2003. A conceptual framework and its application for
addressing leakage: The case of avoided deforestation. Climate Policy 3, 123-136.
Aune, J.B., Alemu, A.T. and Gautam, K.P., 2004. Carbon sequestration in rural communities.
Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21(1), 69-79.
Backstrand, K., 2004. Scientisation vs. civic expertise in environmental governance: Eco-feminist,
eco-modern and post-modern responses, Environmental Politics 13(4), 695-714.
Backstrand, K and Lovbrand, E., 2006. Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested
discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism.
Global Environmental Politics 6(1), 50-75.
Backstrand, K. and Kylsater, M., 2014. Old wine in new bottles? The legitimation and
delegitimation of UN public–private partnerships for sustainable development from the
Johannesburg Summit to the Rio+20 Summit, Globalizations 11(3), 331-347.
Baker, J., Milner-Gulland, E.J. and Leader-Williams, N., 2011. Park gazettement and integrated
conservation and development as factors in community conflict at Bwindi Impenetrable
Forest, Uganda. Conservation Biology 26(1), 160-170.
Balmford, A. and Whitten, T., 2003. Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the
costs be met? Oryx 37(2), 238-250.
Barr, C.M. and Sayer, J.A., 2012. The political economy of reforestation and forest restoration in
Asia–Pacific: Critical issues for REDD+. Biological Conservation 154, 9-19.
Basnet, R, 2009. Carbon ownership in community managed forests. Journal of Forest and
Livelihood 8(1), 77-83.
Bauer, S., Biermann, F., Dingwerth, K., and Siebenhüner, B. 2009. Understanding international
bureaucracies: Taking stock. In: Biermann, F. and Siebenhünder, B (Eds.) Managers of
global governance. The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. The MIT
Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA / London, UK, 15-36.
Bausch, C. and Mehling, M., 2006. ‘Alive and kicking’: The First Meeting of the Parties to the
Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law
15(2), 193-201.
Bekessy, S.A. and Wintle, B.A., 2008. Using carbon investment to grow the biodiversity bank.
Conservation Biology 22(3), 510-513.
Benessaiah, K., 2012. Carbon and livelihoods in Post-Kyoto: Assessing voluntary carbon markets.
Ecological Economics 77, 1-6.
Benjaminsen, T.A. and Svarstad, H., 2010. ‘The death of an elephant: Conservation discourses
versus practices in Africa. Forum for Development Studies 37(3), 385-408.
Bennett, M.T., 2008. China’s sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business
as usual? Ecological Economics 65 (2008), 699-711.
Bernauer, T. and Betzold, C., 2012. Civil society in global environmental governance. The Journal
of Environment & Development, 2012 21, 62-66.
Betsill, M.M., and Corell. E., 2001. NGO Influence in international environmental negotiations: A
framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 1(4), 65-85.
Beymer-Farris, B.A. and Bassett, T.J., 2012. The REDD+ menace: Resurgent protectionism in
Tanzania’s mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change 22, 332-341.
Biermann, F., 2007. ‘Earth System Governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research.
Global Environmental Change 17, 326-337.
200
Biermann, F, and Pattberg P., 2008. Global environmental governance: Taking stock and moving
forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33, 277-294.
Biermann, F., Davies, O. and van der Grijp, N, 2009a. Environmental policy integration and the
architecture of global environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements
9, 351-369.
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., and Zelli, F., 2009b. The fragmentation of global
governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 9(4),
14-40.
Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B. (Eds.), 2009. Managers of global change: The influence of
international environmental bureaucracies. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
USA/London, UK, 14 pp.
Biermann, F. and Gupta, A., 2011. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A
research framework. Ecological Economics 70, 1856-1864.
Bishop, J., Kapila, S., Hicks, F., Mitchell, P. and Vorhies, F., 2010. New business models for
biodiversity conservation, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 285-303.
Blom, B., Sunderland, T. and Murdiyarso, D., 2010. Getting REDD+ to work locally: Lessons
learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environmental Science &
Policy 13, 164-172.
Bluffstone, R., Robinson, W. and Guthiga, P., 2013. REDD+ and community-controlled forests in
low-income countries: Any hope for a linkage? Ecological Economics 87, 43-52.
Bodle, R., Donat, L. and Duwe, M., 2016. The Paris Agreement: Analysis, assessment and outlook.
Background paper for the workshop “Beyond COP21: what does Paris mean for future
climate policy?”, January 2016, BMUB, Berlin, Germany, 30 pp.
Bohmelt, T and Betzold, C. 2012. The impact of environmental interest groups in international
negotiations: Do ENGOs induce stronger environmental commitments? International
Environmental Agreements DOI 10.1007/s10784-012-9180-3, 25 pp.
Bond, I., Grieg-Gran, M., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Hazlewood, P., Wunder, S. and Angelsen, A.,
2009. Incentives to sustain forest ecosystem services: A review and lessons for REDD+.
Natural Resources Issues 16. International Institute for Environment and Development,
London, UK with CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia and World Resources Institute, Washington,
D.C., USA, 47pp.
Bonnie, R., and Schwartzman, S., 2003. Tropical deforestation and reforestation and the Kyoto
Protocol. Conservation Biology 17(1), 4-5.
Börner, J. and Wunder, S., 2008. Paying for avoided deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: Form
cost assessment to scheme design. International Forestry Review 10(3), 496-511.
Börner, J., Wunder, S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Rügnitz Tito, M., Pereira, L. and Nascimento, N.,
2010. Direct conservation payments in the Brazilian Amazon: Scope and equity
implications. Ecological Economics 69(6), 1272-1282 .
Börner, J., Wunder, S., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Hyman, G. and Nascimento, N., 2011. REDD+
sticks and carrots in the Brazilian Amazon: Assessing costs and livelihood implications.
CCAFS Working Paper 8. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). Copenhagen,
Denmark, 42 pp.
Borrego, A. and Skutsch, M., 2014. Estimating the opportunity costs of activities that cause
degradation in tropical dry forest: Implications for REDD+. Ecological Economics 101, 1-
9.
Bottazzi, P., Cattaneo, A., Crespo Rocha, D. and Rist, S., 2013. Assessing sustainable forest
management under REDD+: A community-based labour perspective. Ecological
Economics 93, 94-103.
Boucher, D., Elias, P., Lininger, K., May-Tobin, C., Roquemore, S., and Saxon, E., 2011. The root
of the problem, what’s driving tropical deforestation today? Union of Concerned Scientists,
Cambridge, USA, 126 pp.
201
Boucher, D., 2015. The REDD+/carbon market offsets debate: Big argument, small potatoes.
Journal of Sustainable Forestry 34(6-7), 547-558.
Bouteligier, S., 2011. Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth
system governance. International Environmental Agreements 11, 43-61.
Boyd, E. and Schipper, E.L., 2002. The Marrakech Accord−−At the crossroad to ratification:
Seventh Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change. The Journal of Environment Development 11, 184-190.
Boyd E., May, P., Chang, M. and Veiga, F.C., 2007. Exploring socioeconomic impacts of forest
based mitigation projects: Lessons from Brazil and Bolivia. Environmental Science &
Policy 10, 419-433.
Boyd, E., Corbera, E. and Estrada, M., 2008. UNFCCC negotiations (pre-Kyoto to COP-9): What
the process says about the politics of CDM-sinks. International Environmental
Agreements 8, 95-112.
Boyd, E., 2009. Governing the Clean Development Mechanism: Global rhetoric versus local
realities in carbon sequestration projects. Environment and Planning A 41, 2380-2395.
Bozmoski, A. and Hepburn, C., 2009. The interminable politics of forest carbon: an EU outlook.
Background paper for forest carbon finance summit 2009: making forest carbon markets
work. Washington, DC. 6-8 March 2009
Bozmoski, A.S., and Hultman, N.E., 2009. Participant perceptions of risk and benefit in carbon
forestry: Evidence from central Tanzania. Journal of Environment & Development 19(1),
4-27.
Brockhaus, M. and Angelsen, A., 2012. Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: a political economy
framework. In: Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D., Verchot, L. (Eds.),
Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 15-30.
Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M. and Mardiah, S., 2013. Governing the design of national REDD+:
An analysis of the power of agency. Forest Policy and Economics 49, 23-33.
Brockhaus, M., Di Gregorio, M. and Carmenta, R., 2014. REDD+ policy networks: Exploring
actors and power structures in an emerging policy domain. Ecology and Society 19(4): 29,
32 pp.
Brockington, D., Igoe, J. and Schmidt-Soltau, K., 2006. Conservation, human rights, and poverty
reduction. Conservation Biology 20(1), 250-252.
Broughton, E and Pirard, R., 2011. What’s in a name? Market-based instruments for biodiversity.
Health and Environment reports 8, Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Paris,
France, 82 pp.
Brown, K., 2001. Cut and run. Evolving institutions for global forest governance. Journal of
International Development 13, 893-905 .
Brown, M., 2010. Limiting Corrupt Incentives in a Global REDD+ Regime. Ecology Law
Quarterly, Vol. 37, 237 – 268.
Brown, L.D., Ebrahim, A. and Batliwala, S., 2012. Governing international advocacy NGOs. World
Development 40(6), 1098-1108.
Bruce, J., 2012. Identifying and working with beneficiaries when rights are unclear: Insights for
REDD+ initiatives. Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington, D.C, USA, 88 pp.
Bryan, B.A., 2013. Incentives, land use, and ecosystem services: Synthesizing complex linkages.
Environmental Science & Policy 27, 124-134.
Bulkeley, H., 2000. Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network.
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 18, 727-748.
Cacho, O.J., Wise, R.M. and MacDicken, K.G., 2004. Carbon monitoring costs and their effects on
incentives to sequester carbon through forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for
Global Change 154, 273-293.
Cacho, O.J., Marshall, G.R. and Milne, M., 2005. Transaction and abatement costs of carbon-sink
projects in developing countries. Environment and Development Economics 10, 597-614.
202
Cacho, O.J., Milne, S., Gonzalez, R. and Tacconi, L., 2014. Benefits and costs of deforestation by
smallholders: Implications for forest conservation and climate policy. Ecological
Economics 107, 321-332.
Cadman, T. and Maraseni, T., 2013. More equal than others? A comparative analysis of state and
non-state perceptions of interest representation and decision-making in REDD+
negotiations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3), 214-230.
Cain, Z. and Lovejoy, S., 2004. History and outlook for Farm Bill Conservation Programs. Choices,
4th Quarter, American Agricultural Economics Association, USA, 37-42.
Campbell, B.M., 2009. Beyond Copenhagen: REDD+, agriculture, adaptation strategies and
poverty. Global Environmental Change 19, 397-399.
Caplow, S., Jagger, P., Lawlor, K. and Sills, E., 2011. Evaluating land use and livelihood impacts of
early forest carbon projects: Lessons for learning about REDD+. Environmental Science
& Policy 14(2), 152-167.
Cashore, B., Galloway, G., Cubbage, F., Humphreys, D., Katila, P., Levin, K., Maryudi, A.,
McDermott, C. and McGinley, K., 2010. Ability of institutions to address new challenges.
In: Mery, G., Katila, P., Galloway, G., Alfaro, R., Kanninen, M., Lobovikov, M. and Varjo,
J. (Eds). Forests and Society ‒ Responding to Global Drivers of Change. International
Union of Forest Research Organizations World Series 25, Tampere, Finland: 441-485.
Castillo-Santiago, M.A., Hellier, A., Tipper, R. and de Jong, B.H.J., 2007. Carbon emissions from
land-use change: An analysis of causal factors in Chiapas, Mexico. Mitigation and
Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12, 1213-1235.
Cattaneo, A., Lubowski, R., Busch, J., Creed, A., Strassburg, B., Boltz, F. and Ashton, R., 2010. On
international equity in reducing emissions from deforestation. Environmental Science &
Policy 13, 742-753.
Cenamo, M.C. and Carrero, G.C., 2012. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest
Degradation (REDD+) in Apuí, Southern Amazonas: Challenges and caveats related to
land tenure and governance in the Brazilian Amazon, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 31(4-
5), 445-468.
Cerbu, G.A., Swallow, B.M. and Thompson, D.Y., 2011. Locating REDD+: A global survey and
analysis of REDD+ readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science and
Policy 14, 168-180
Chandrasekharan Behr, D., Cunningham, E.M., Kajembe, G., Mbeyale, G., Nsita, S. and
Rosenbaum, K.L., 2012. Benefit sharing in practice, insights for REDD+ initiatives.
Program on Forests (Profor), Washington D.C., USA, 152 pp.
Charnley, S., 2005. Industrial plantation forestry, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21(4), 35-57.
Chen, X, Lupi, F., Vina, A., He, G and Liu, J., 2010. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the
efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services. Conservation
Biology 24(6), 1469-1478.
Chester, C.C. and Moomaw, W.R., 2008. A taxonomy of collaborative governance: A guide to
understanding the diversity of international and domestic conservation accords.
International Environmental Agreements 8, 187-206.
Chhatre, A. and Agrawal, A., 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood
benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(42),
17667-17670.
Chomba, S., Kariuki, J., Friis Lund, J. and Sinclair, F., 2016. Roots of inequity: How the
implementation of REDD+ reinforces past injustices. Land Use Policy 50, 202-213.
Chomitz, K.M., 2002. Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: How do forestry and energy
projects compare? Climate Policy 2, 35-49.
Chomitz, K.M., with Buys, P., De Luca, G., Thomas, T.S. and Wertz- Kanounnikoff, S., 2007. At
loggerheads? Agricultural expansion, poverty reduction, and environment in the tropical
forests. A World Bank Policy Research Report. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA,
284 pp.
203
Choumert, J., Combes Motel, P. and Dakpo, H.K., 2013. Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve for
deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature. Ecological Economics
90, 19-28.
Coad, L., Campbell, A., Miles, L. and Humphries, K., 2008. The costs and benefits of protected
areas for local livelihoods: A review of the current literature. Working Paper. UNEP World
Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, U.K, 45 pp.
Cock, A.R., 2008. Tropical forests in the global States system. International Affairs 84(2), 315-333.
Colfer, C.J.P., 2011. Marginalized forest peoples’ perceptions of the legitimacy of governance: An
exploration. World Development 39(12), 2147-2164.
Combes Motel, P., Pirard, R. and Combes, J.-L., 2009. A methodology to estimate impacts of
domestic policies on deforestation: Compensated successful efforts for “avoided
deforestation” (REDD+). Ecological Economics 68, 680-691.
Contreras-Hermosilla, A., 2000. The underlying causes of forest decline. Occasional Paper 30,
CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 29 pp.
Cooley, D.M., Galik, C.S., Holmes, T.P., Kousky, C. and Cooke, R.M., 2012. Managing
dependencies in forest offset projects: Toward a more complete evaluation of reversal risk.
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 17, 17-24.
Coomes, O.T., Grimard, F., Potvin, C. and Sima, P., 2008. The fate of the tropical forest: Carbon
or cattle? Ecological Economics 65(2), 207-212.
Corbera, E., Kosoy, N. and Martínez Tuna, M., 2007. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem
services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Global
Environmental Change 17(3-4), 365-380.
Corbera, E. and Brown, K., 2008. Building institutions to trade ecosystem services: Marketing
forest carbon in Mexico. World Development 36(10), 1956-1979.
Corbera, E., Gonzalez Soberanis, C., and Brown, K., 2009. Institutional dimensions of payments
for ecosystem services: An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecological
Economics 68, 743-761.
Corbera, E., Estrada, M. and Brown, K., 2010. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from
deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: Revisiting the assumptions.
Climate Change 100, 355-388.
Corbera, E and Schroeder, H., 2011. Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental
Science and Policy 14, 89-99.
Cotula, L., and Mayers, J., 2009. Tenure in REDD+: Start-point or afterthought? Natural Resource
Issues 15, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, 58 pp.
Crossman, N.D., Bryan, B.A. and Summers, D.M., 2011. Carbon payments and low-costs
conservation. Conservation Biology 25(4), 835-845.
Daniels, A.E., Bagstad, K., Esposito, V., Moulaert, A. and Rodriguez, C.M., 2010. Understanding
the impacts of Costa Rica’s PES: Are we asking the right questions? Ecological Economics
69, 2116-2126.
Dargusch, P., Lawrence, K., Herbohn, J. and Medrilzam, 2010. A small-scale forestry perspective
on constraints to including REDD+ in international carbon markets. Small-scale Forestry
9, 485-499.
Daviet, F., 2009. Improving LULUCF offset projects: A carbon performance standard and
ecosystem services, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 481-496.
Den Besten, J.W., Arts, B. and Verkooijen, P., 2014. The evolution of REDD+: An analysis of
discursive- institutional dynamics. Environmental Science & Policy 35, 40-48.
De Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A. and Boumans, R.M.J., 2002. A typology for the classification,
description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological
Economics 41, 393-408.
Dellas, E., Pattberg, P. and Betsill, M., 2011. Agency in earth system governance: Refining a
research agenda. International Environmental Agreements 11, 85-98.
204
De Jong, B.H.J., Hellier, A., Castillo-Santiago, M.A. and Tipper, R., 2005. Application of the
‘Climafor’ approach to estimate baseline carbon emissions of a forest conservation project
in the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global
Change 10, 265-278.
De Jong, B.H.J. and Esquival Bazan, E., 2007. Application of the ‘‘Climafor’’ baseline to determine
leakage: the case of Scolel Té. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12,
1153-1168.
De Koning, F., Aguinaga, M., Bravo, M., Chiu, M., Lascano, M., Lozada, T. and Suarez, L., 2011.
Bridging the gap between forest conservation and poverty alleviation: The Ecuadorian
Socio Bosque program. Environmental Science & Policy 14, 531-542.
Di Gregorio, M., 2012. Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: Interest,
values or discourse? Environmental Politics, 21(1), 1-25 .
Dingwerth, K. and Pattberg, P., 2006. Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global
Governance 12(2), 185-203.
Doherty, E. and Schroeder, H., 2011. Forest tenure and multi-level governance in avoiding
deforestation under REDD+. Global Environmental Politics 11(4), 66-88.
Dombrowski, K., 2010. Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations responses
to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance. International
Environmental Agreements 10, 397-416.
Dryzek, J.S., 2005. The politics of the earth. Environmental Discourses 2. Oxford University Press,
Oxford, UK, 270 pp.
Dudley, R.G., 2005. A generic look at payments for environmental services, plan or scam? Paper
prepared for the 23rd International System Dynamics Conference, Bogor, Indonesia and
Portland, Oregon, USA, 30 pp.
Dudley, R.G., 2010. A little REDD+ model to quickly compare possible baseline and policy
scenarios for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Mitigation and
Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 15, 53-69.
Dulal, H.B., Shah, K.U. and Sapkota, C., 2012. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest
degradation (REDD+) projects: Lessons for future policy design and implementation,
International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(2), 116-129.
Dutschke, M. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., with Peskett, L., Luttrell, C., Streck, C. and Brown, J.,
2008. Financing REDD+, Linking country needs and financing sources. CIFOR, Bogor,
Indonesia, 6 pp.
Dutschke, M., Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Peskett, L., Luttrell, C., Streck, C. and Brown, J., 2008. Mapping potential sources of REDD+ financing to different needs and national circumstances. Draft CIFOR working paper, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, Amazon Environmental Research Institute, Brasilia, Brazil and Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 34 pp.
Dutschke, M., 2010. Forestry, risk and climate policy. Thesis for the University of Groningen, Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen, Germany, 218 pp.
Eagleton-Pierce, M., 2011. Advancing a reflexive international relations. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 39(3), 805-823.
Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. The Academy of Management
Review 14(1), 57-74.
Ekins, P, Kesicki, F. and Smith, A.Z.P., 2011. Marginal abatement cost curves: A call for caution.
UCL Energy Institute, University College London, UK, 37 pp.
Elias, P.E., 2013. How can we incentivize tropical forest restoration? Journal of Sustainable
Forestry 32(7), 694-701.
Eliasch, J., 2008. Climate change: financing global forests. The Eliasch review. Office of Climate
Change, London, UK, pp. 250.
Engel, S., Pagiola, S. and Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in
theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65(4), 663-674.
205
Eyckmans, J. and Finus, M., 2007. Measures to enhance the success of global climate treaties.
International Environmental Agreements 7, 73-97.
Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Börner, J., Violato-Espada, A.L., Nascimento, N., Piketty, M.G., 2011. Forest
loss and management in land reform settlements: Implications for REDD+ governance in
the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Science & Policy 14, 188-200.
Faeth, P., Cort, C. and Livernash, R., 1994. Evaluating the carbon sequestration benefits of forestry
projects in developing countries. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA, 97
pp.
FAO, 1998. Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) 2000 terms and definitions. FRA Working Paper
1, FAO, Rome, Italy, 154 pp.
FAO, 2007. Gender Mainstreaming in Forestry in Africa. Forest Policy Working Paper 18, FAO,
Rome, Italy, 61 pp.
FAO, 2010. State of the World’s Forests 2009. FAO, Rome, Italy, 378 pp.
FAO. 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. FAO, Rome, Italy, 56 pp.
FAO, 2016. Forty years of community-based forestry, a review of its extent and effectiveness.
FAO, Rome, Italy, 168 pp.
Farley, J. and Costanza, R. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological
Economics 69, 2060-2068.
Farley, J., Aquino, A., Daniels, A., Moulaert, A., Lee, D. and Krause, A., 2010. Global mechanisms
for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 2075-2084.
Ferraro, P.J., 2011. The future of payments for environmental services. Conservation Biology 25(6),
1134-1138.
Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., Büscher, B. and Anderson, Z.R., 2016. Questioning REDD+ and the
future of market-based conservation. Conservation Biology 30(3), 673-675.
Forner, C., Blaser, J., Jotzo, F. and Robledo, C., 2006. Keeping the forest for the climate’s sake:
Avoiding deforestation in developing countries under the UNFCCC. Climate Policy 6, 2-
20.
Forsyth, T. 2007. Are environmental social movements socially exclusive? An historical study from
Thailand. World Development 35(12), 2110-2130.
Fosci, M., 2013. Balance sheet in the REDD+ +: Are global estimates measuring the wrong costs?
Ecological Economics 89, 196-200.
Fosci, M., 2014. The economic case for prioritizing governance over financial incentives in
REDD+. Climate Policy 13(2), 170-190.
Friis Lund, J. and Treue, T., 2008. Are we getting there? Evidence of decentralized forest
management from the Tanzanian Miombo woodlands. World Development 36(12), 2780-
2800.
Fritzen, S.A., 2007. Can the design of community-driven development reduce the risk of elite
capture? Evidence from Indonesia. World Development 35(8), 1359-1375.
Fry, I., 2002. Twists and turns in the jungle: Exploring the evolution of land use, land use change
and forestry decisions within the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European Community and
International Environmental Law 11(2), 159-168.
Fry, I., 2007. More twists, turns and stumbles in the jungle: A further exploration of the evolution
of land use, land use change and forestry decisions within the Kyoto Protocol. Review of
European Community and International Environmental Law 16(3), 341-355.
Fry, I., 2008. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: Opportunities and
pitfalls in developing a new legal regime. Review of European Community and
International Environmental Law 17(2), 166-182.
Fry, I., 2011. If a tree falls in a Kyoto Forest and nobody is there to hear it, will it be accounted for?
An insider’s view of the negotiations surrounding land use, land-use change and forestry
for the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. Review of European
Community and International Environmental Law 20(2), 123-138.
206
Gale, F., 1998. Constructing global civil society actors: An anatomy of the environmental coalition
contesting the tropical timber trade regime. Global Society 12(3), 343-361.
Garcia-Amado, LR.., Ruiz Perez, M., Reyes Escutia, F., Barasa Garcia, S. and Contreras Mejia, E.,
2011. Efficiency of payments for environmental services: Equity and additionality in a case
study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico. Ecological Economics 70, 2361-2368.
Gerber, J.F., 2011. Conflicts over industrial tree plantations in the South: Who, how and why?
Global Environmental Change 21, 165-176.
German, L., Villamor, G., Twine, E., Velarde, S.J. and Kidane, B., 2009. Environmental services
and the precautionary principle: Using scenarios to reconcile conservation and livelihood
objectives in upper catchments. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 368-394.
Gibbs, H.K., Brown, S., Niles, J.O., and Foley, J.A., 2007. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest
carbon stocks: Making REDD+ a reality. Environmental Research Letters 2, 045023, IOP
Publishing, UK, 14 pp.
Gillespie, A., 2006. Facilitating and controlling civil society in international environmental law.
Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 15(3), 327-338.
Gomez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L. and Montes, C., 2010. The history of ecosystem
services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment
schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 1209-1218.
Graichen, P., 2005. Can forestry gain from emissions trading? Rules governing sinks projects under
the UNFCCC and the EU Emissions Trading System. Review of European Community
and International Environmental Law 14(1), 11-18.
Gregersen, H., El Lakany, H., Karsenty, A and White, A, 2010. Does the opportunity cost
approach indicate the real cost of REDD+? Rights and realities of paying for REDD+.
Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington D.C., USA, 30 pp.
Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I. and Wunder, S., 2005. How can market mechanisms for forest
environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World
Development 33, 1511-1527.
Grieg-Gran, M. 2006. The cost of avoiding deforestation: Report prepared for the Stern Review of
the economics of climate change: International Institute for Environment and
Development, London, UK, 26 pp.
Grondard, N., Loisel, C., Martinet, A. and Routier, J.B. 2008. Reducing emissions from
deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): Analysis of 7 outstanding issues for the
inclusion of tropical forests in the international climate governance. ONF International,
Paris, France, 52 pp.
Grubb, M., Laing, T., Counsell, T. and Willan, C., 2011. Global carbon mechanisms: Lessons and
implications. Climatic Change 104, 539-573.
Gsottbauer, E. and van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 2012. Bounded rationality and social interaction in
negotiating a climate agreement. International Environmental Agreements 13, 25 pp.
Gupta, J., 2003. The Role of Non-State actors in international environmental affairs. Heidelberg
Journal of International Law 63(2), 459-486.
Gupta, J., 2005. Non-State Actors in international governance and law: A challenge or blessing,
ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law 11(3), 497-517.
Gupta, J., 2008. Global change: Analysing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In:
Young, O, Schroeder, H. and King, L. (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change:
Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers, MIT Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts, USA, pp. 225-258.
Gupta, J. and van der Grijp, N. (Eds.), 2010. Mainstreaming climate change in development
cooperation. theory, practice and implications for the European Union. Cambridge
University Press, UK, 348 pp.
Gupta, J. and Sanchez, N., 2012. Global green governance: Embedding the green economy in a
global green and equitable rule of law polity. Review of European Community and
International Environmental Law 21(1), 12-22.
207
Gupta, J., 2012. Glocal Forest and REDD+ Governance: win-win or lose-lose? Current Opinion in
Environmental Sustainability 4, 620-627.
Gupta, J., Grijp, N.M. van der and Kuik, O.J. (Eds.), 2013. Climate change, forests and REDD+:
Lessons for institutional design. Routledge, London, UK, 263 pp.
Gupta, J., 2014. The history of global climate governance. Cambridge University Press, UK, 262 pp.
Gupta, J. and Stec, S., 2014. Strengthening UNEP’s legitimacy: Towards greater stakeholder
engagement. UNEP perspectives 11. UNEP, 2014, 13 pp.
Haggard, S. and Simmons, B.A., 1987. Theories of international regimes. International
Organization 41(3), 491-517.
Hajek, F., Ventresca, M.J., Scriven, J. and Castro, A. 2011. Regime-building for REDD+: Evidence
from a cluster of local initiatives in South-Eastern Peru. Environmental Science & Policy
14(2), 201-215.
Hajer, M., and Versteeg, W., 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics:
Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 7(3),
175-184.
Hajer, M., 2006. Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning, In: Van den Brink, M.
and Metze, T. (Eds.), 2006. Words matter in policy and planning - Discourse theory and
method in the social sciences. Netherlands Geographical Studies 33, 65-74.
Hallegatte, S., Bangalore, M., Bonzanigo, L., Fay, M., Kane, T., Narloch, U., Rozenberg, J., Treguer,
D. and Vogt-Schilb, A., 2016. Shock waves: Managing the impacts of climate change on
poverty. Climate Change and Development Series, World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA,
227 pp.
Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P and Rittberger, V., 1997. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge
University Press, UK, 248 pp.
Hatcher, J., 2009. Securing tenure rights and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and
Degradation (REDD+). Social Development Working Paper 120, World Bank,
Washington D.C., USA, 24 pp.
Haug, C. and Gupta, J., 2013. Global forest governance. In Gupta, J., Van der Grijp, N. and Kuik,
O. (Eds.), 2013. Climate change, forests and REDD: Lessons for institutional design,
Routledge, London, UK, pp. 52-76.
Hayes, T. and Persha, L., 2010. Nesting local forestry initiatives: Revisiting community forest
management in a REDD+ world. Forest Policy and Economics 12, 545-553.
Headon S., 2009. Whose sustainable development? Sustainable Ddevelopment under the Kyoto
protocol, “the Coldplay Effect” and the CDM Gold standard. Colorado Journal of
International Environmental Law and Policy 20(2), 127-156.
Heaton, K., 2005. mitigating environmental and social impacts of intensive plantation forestry.
Journal of Sustainable Forestry 21(4), 75-96.
Hein, J., Adiwibowo, S., Dittrich, C., Rosyani, Soetarto, E. and Faust, H., 2015. Rescaling of access
and property relations in a frontier landscape: Insights from Jambi, Indonesia. The
Professional Geographer 68(3), 380-389.
Herzog, H., Caldeira, K. and Reilly, J., 2003. An issue of permanence: Assessing the effectiveness of
temporary carbon storage. Climatic Change 59, 293-310.
Hoehne, N., Wartmann, S., Herold, A. and Freibauer, A., 2007. The rules for land use, land use
changes and forestry under the Kyoto Protocol – lessons learned for the future climate
negotiations. Environmental Science and Policy 10, 353-369.
Holm Olsen, K., 2007. The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable
development: A review of the literature. Climatic Change 84, 59-73.
Holm, S.O., 2015. A management strategy for multiple ecosystem services in boreal forests. Journal
of Sustainable Forestry 34(4), 358-379.
Holopainen, J. and Wit, M. (Eds)., 2008. Financing sustainable forest management. Tropenbos
International, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 169 pp.
208
Hovani, A. and Fotos, M., 2007. policy alternatives to increase the demand for forest-based carbon
sequestration, Journal of Sustainable Forestry 25(1-2), 99-117.
Huberman, D., 2009. World Heritage sites and the integration of biodiversity into an international
PES framework. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 456-480.
Huettner, M., 2012. Risks and opportunities of REDD+ implementation for environmental
integrity and socio-economic compatibility. Environmental Science & Policy 15, 4-12.
Huitema, D., and S. Meijerink. 2010. Realizing water transitions. the role of policy entrepreneurs in
water policy change. Ecology and Society 15(2): 26, 10 pp.
Humphreys, D., 2003. Life protective of carcinogenic challenge? Global forest governance under
advanced capitalism. Global Environmental Politics 3(2), 40-55.
Humphreys, D. 2006. Logjam. Deforestation and the crisis of global governance, Earthscan,
London, UK, 302 pp.
Humphreys, D., 2008. The politics of ‘avoided deforestation’: Historical context and contemporary
issues. International Forestry Review,10(3), 433--42.
Hunt, C. and Baum, S., 2009. The ‘hidden’ social costs of forestry offsets. Mitigation and
Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14, 107-120.
IPCC, 1990. Climate change: The IPCC scientific assessment. Report prepared for
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by Working Group I, Houghton, J.T.,
Jenkins, G.J. and Ephraums, J.J. (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, UK, New York, US
and Melbourne, Australia, 410 pp.
IPCC, 2002. Climate change and biodiversity, IPCC Technical Paper V. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, 77
pp.
IPCC, 2006. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories 4, Agriculture, forestry and
other land use. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme,
Eggleston, H.S., Buendia L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. and Tanabe, K. (Eds). IGES, Japan, 20
pp.
IPCC, 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III
to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
Pachauri, R.K. and Reisinger, A. (Eds.). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 104.
IPCC, 2013. Summary for policymakers. In: Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G., Tignor, M., Allen, S.,
Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V. and Midgley, P. (Eds.), 2013. Climate change
2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge
University Press, UK and New York, USA, 1535 pp.
IPCC, 2014. Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III
to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
Pachauri, R.K. and Meyer, L.A. (Eds.). IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
IPCCA, 2011. Analytical background paper on the legal aspects of REDD+ and recent REDD+
policy developments. Indigenous Peoples Climate Change Assessment, Cuzco, Peru, 50 pp.
Irawan, S., Tacconi, L. and Ring, I., 2013. Stakeholders’ incentives for land-use change and
REDD+: The case of Indonesia. Ecological Economics 87, 75-83.
Jacquemont, F. and Caparros, A., 2002. The Convention on Biological Diversity and the Climate
Change Convention 10 years after Rio: Towards a synergy of the two regimes? Review of
European Community and International Environmental Law 11(2), 169-180.
James, A., Gaston, K.J. and Balmford, A., 2001. Can we afford to conserve
biodiversity? BioScience, 51(1), 43-52.
Jaung, W. and Soo Bae, J., 2012. Evaluating socio-economic equity of REDD+ in a rights-based
approach: Rapid equity appraisal matrix. Environmental Science & Policy 22, 1-12.
Jindal, R., Swallow, B. and Kerr, J.M., 2008. Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa:
Potential benefits and challenges. Natural Resources Forum 32, 116-130.
209
Jindal, R., Kerr, J.M. and Carter, S., 2012. reducing poverty through carbon forestry? Impacts of the
N’hambita Community Carbon Project in Mozambique. World Development 40(10), 2123-
2135.
Johns, T., Merry, F., Stickler, C., Nepstad, D., Laporte, N. and Goetza, S., 2008. A three-fund
approach to incorporating government, public and private forest stewards into a REDD+
funding mechanism. International Forestry Review 10(3), 458-464.
Kaimowitz, D. and Angelsen, A., 1998. Economic models of tropical deforestation. A review.
CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 140 pp.
Kaimowitz, D. 2008. The prospects for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation
(REDD+) in Mesoamerica. International Forestry Review 10(3), 485-495.
Kanninen, M., Murdiyarso, D., Seymour, F., Angelsen, A., Wunder, S. and German, L., 2007. Do
trees grow on money? The implications of deforestation research for policies to promote
REDD+. Forest Perspectives 4, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 73 pp.
Kanowski, P.J., McDermott, C.L. and Cashore, B.W., 2010. Implementing REDD+: Lessons from
analysis of forest governance. Environmental Science & Policy 14, 111-117.
Karsenty, A., 2008. The architecture of proposed REDD+ schemes after Bali: Facing critical
choices. International Forestry Review 10(3), 443-457.
Karsenty, A., 2009. What the (carbon) market cannot do..., CIRAD, Paris, France, 4 pp.
Karsenty, A., and Ongolo, S., 2011. Can “fragile States” decide to reduce their deforestation? The
inappropriate use of the theory of incentives with respect to the REDD+ mechanism.
Forest Policy and Economics 18, 38-45.
Karsenty, A., Vogel, A. and Castell, F., 2012. ‘‘Carbon rights’’, REDD+ and payments for
environmental services. Environmental Science and Policy 35, 20-29.
Karsenty, A. 2012. Financing options to support REDD+ activities. CIRAD, Paris, France, 77 pp.
Kasa, S., Gullberg, A.T. and Heggelund, G., 2007. The Group of 77 in the international climate
negotiations: Recent developments and future directions. International Environmental
Agreements 8, 113-127.
Kashwan, P. and Holahan, R., 2014. Nested governance for effective REDD+: Institutional and
political arguments. International Journal of the Commons 8(2), 554-575.
Kindermann, G., M. Obersteiner, B. Sohngen J. Sathaye, K. Andrasko, E. Rametsteiner, B.
Schlamadinger, S. Wunder, R. Beach., 2008. Global cost estimates of reducing carbon
emissions through avoided deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 105(30), 10302-10307.
Kiss., A., Castro, G. and Newcombe, K., 2002. The role of multilateral institutions. Philosphical
Transactions of the Royal Society, London A 360, 1641-1652.
Kissinger, G., Herold, M., De Sy, V., 2012. Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A
synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers. Lexeme Consulting, Vancouver, Canada, 48
pp.
Koellner, T., Sell, J. Gahwiler, M. and Scholz, R.W., 2008. Assessment of the management of
organizations supplying ecosystem services from tropical forests. Global Environmental
Change 18, 746-757.
Kosoy, N. and Corbera, E., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism.
Ecological Economics 69, 1228-1236.
Köthke, M., Leischner, B. and Elsasser, P., 2013. Uniform global deforestation patterns — An
empirical analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 28, 23-37.
Kothke, M., Schroppel, B. and Elsasser, P., 2014. National REDD+ reference levels deduced from
the global deforestation curve. Forest Policy and Economics 43, 18-28.
Krasner, S.D., 1982. Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes and intervening variables.
International Organization 36, 185-205.
Krause, T. and Nielson, T.D., 2014. The legitimacy of incentive-based conservation and a critical
account of social safeguards. Environmental Science & Policy 41, 44-51.
210
Kuik, O.J., 2013. REDD policies, global food, fiber and timber markets, and ‘leakage’. In: Gupta, J.,
Van der Grijp, N.M. and Kuik, O.J. (Eds.), 2013. Climate change, forests and REDD+:
Lessons for institutional design. Routledge, London, UK, 263 pp.
Kuik, O.J., 2014. REDD+ and international leakage via food and timber markets: A CGE analysis.
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 19, 641-655.
Kulovesi, K. and Gutierrez, M., 2009. Climate change negotiations update: Process and prospects
for a Copenhagen agreed outcome in December 2009. Review of European Community
and International Environmental Law 18(3), 229-243.
Lahsen, M., 2005. Technocracy, democracy and US climate politics: The need for demarcations.
Science, Technology and Human Values 30(1), 137-169.
Laing, T. and Palmer, C., 2015. Economy-wide impacts of REDD+ when there is political
influence. Resource and Energy Economics 40, 107-126.
Landell-Mills, N. and Porras, I.T., 2002. Silver bullet or fool’s gold? A global review of markets for
forest environmental services and their impacts on the poor. International Institute for
Environmental and Development, London, UK, 272 pp.
Larson, A.M. and Ribot, J.C., 2007. The poverty of forestry policy: Double standards on an uneven
playing field. Sustainability Science 2(2), 189-204.
Larson, A.M., 2011. Forest tenure reform in the age of climate change: Lessons for REDD+.
Global Environmental Change 21, 540-549.
Lasco, R.D., Pulhin, F.B. and Sales, R.F., 2007. Analysis of leakage in carbon sequestration projects
in forestry: A case study of upper Magat watershed, Philippines. Mitigation and Adaptation
Strategies for Global Change 12, 1189-1211.
Lawlor, K., Madeira, E.M., Blockhus, J. and Ganz, D.J., 2013. Community participation and
benefits in REDD+: A review of initial outcomes and lessons. Forests 4, 296-318.
Lederer, M., 2011. From CDM to REDD+ ‒ What do we know for setting up effective and
legitimate carbon governance? Ecological Economics 70, 1900-1907.
Lederer, M., 2012. The practice of carbon markets. Environmental Politics 21(4), 640-656.
Leggett, M. and Lovell, H., 2012. Community perceptions of REDD+: A case study from Papua
New Guinea, Climate Policy 12(1), 115-134.
Leimona, B., Van Noordwijk, M., de Groot, R. and Leemans, R., 2015. Fairly efficient, efficiently
fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia.
Ecosystem Services 12, 16-28.
Lejano, R.P., 2006. The design of environmental regimes: Social construction, contextuality, and
improvisation. International Environmental Agreements 6, 187-207.
Lele, U., Kumar, N., Husain, S. A., Zazueta, A. and Kelly, L., 2000. The World Bank forest strategy:
Striking the right balance. The World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA, 153pp.
Lemaitre, S., 2011. Indigenous Peoples’ land rights and REDD+: A case study. Review of
European Community and International Environmental Law 20(2), 150-162.
Lesniewska, F., 2010. REDD+: The Copenhagen effect. Law Environment and Development
Journal, 102 -111
Lesniewska, F., 2014. UNFCCC REDD+ COP Decisions: The cumulative effect on forest related
law processes. International Community Law Review 15(1), 103-121.
Levin, K., McDermott, C. and Cashore, B., 2008. The climate regime as global forest governance:
Can reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) initiatives
pass a ‘dual effectiveness’ test? International Forestry Review 10(3), 538-549.
Lewis, S.J. and Russell, A.J., 2011. Being embedded: A way forward for ethnographic research.
Ethnography 12(3), 398-416.
Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C. Chen, X., 2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s
policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28),
9477-9482.
211
Livengood, E. and Dixon, A., 2009. REDD+ and the effort to limit global warming to 2 C:
Implications for including REDD+ credits in the international carbon market. KEA 3,
New Zealand, 33 pp.
Locatelli, B., Rojas, V. and Salinas, Z., 2008. Impacts of payments for environmental services on
local development in northern Costa Rica: A fuzzy multi-criteria analysis. Forest Policy and
Economics 10, 275-285.
Lovbrand, E., 2004. Bridging political expectations and scientific limitations in climate risk
management – on the uncertain effects of international carbon sink policies. Climatic
Change 67, 449-460.
Lovera, S. 2008. REDD+: The pay-the-polluter principle. In Holopainen, J. and Wit, M. (eds).
Financing sustainable forest management. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, the
Netherlands, 28–32.
Lovera, S., 2009. REDD+ realities. In: Brand, U., Bullard, N., Lander, E., Müller, T. (eds.),
Contours of climate justice: Ideas for Shaping New Climate and Energy Politics. Dag
Hammarskjøld Foundation, Sweden, 46-53.
Luttrell, C., Schreckenberg, K., and Peskett, L., 2007. The implications of carbon financing for pro-
poor community forestry. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 5 pp.
Lyster, R., 2011. REDD+, transparency, participation and resource rights: The role of law.
Environmental Science and Policy 14(2), 118-126.
Maraseni, T.n., Neupane, P.R., Lopez-Castro, F. and Cadman, T., 2014, An assessment of the
impacts of the REDD+ pilot project on community forests user groups (CFUGs) and their
community forests in Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management 136, 37-46.
Massai, L., 2010. The long way to the Copenhagen Accord: Climate change negotiations in 2009.
Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 19(1), 104-121.
Matthews, R., Van Noordwijk, M, Lambin, E., Meyfroidt, P., Gupta, J., Verschot, L., Hergoualc’h,
K. and Veldkamp, E., 2014. Implementing REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from
Deforestation and Degradation): Evidence on governance, evaluation and impactsfrom
the REDD-ALERT project. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 19,
907-925.
Matz, N., 2005. Financial institutions between effectiveness and legitimacy – A legal analysis of the
World Bank, Global Environment Facility and Prototype Carbon Fund. International
Environmental Agreements 5, 265-302.
McCarthy, S. and Tacconi, L., 2011. The political economy of tropical deforestation: Assessing
models and motives. Environmental Politics, 20(1), 115-132.
McDermott, C.L. with Humphreys, D., Wildburger, C., Wood, P., Marfo, E., Pacheco, P. and
Yasmi, Y., 2010. Mapping the core actors and issues defining international forest
governance. In: Rayner, J., Buck, A. and Katila, P. (Eds.), 2010. Embracing complexity:
Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report.
Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime, IUFRO
World Series 28, Vienna, Austria, 19-36.
McDermott, M., Mahanty, S. and Schreckenberg, K, 2013. Examining equity: A multidimensional
framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science
& Policy 33, 416-427.
McDermott, C.L., 2014. REDD+uced: From sustainability to legality to units of carbon—The
search for common interests in international forest governance. Environmental Science &
Policy 35, 12-19.
McElwee, P.D., 2011. Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest
conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem? Geoforum 43(3), 412-426.
McKinsey & Company, 2009. Pathways to a low-carbon economy. Version 2.0 of the global
greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. McKinsey & Company, 192 pp.
212
McNeely, J.A., Miller, K.R., Reid, W.V., Mittermeier, R.A.B., 1990. Conserving the World’s
Biological Diversity. International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural
Resources, Gland, Switzerland, 193 pp.
Melick, D., 2010. Credibility of REDD+ and experiences from Papua New Guinea. Conservation
Biology 24(2), 359-361.
Mendelsohn, R.O., Dinar, A. and Williams, L., 2006. The distributional impact of climate change
on rich and poor countries. Environment and Development Economics 11, 159-178.
Mertz, O., Müller, D., Sikor, T., Hett, C., Heinimann, A., Castella, J.C., Lestrelin, G. et al., 2012.
The forgotten D: Challenges of addressing forest degradation in complex mosaic
landscapes under REDD+. Geografisk Tidsskrift, Danish Journal of Geography 112(1),
63-76.
Michaelowa, A., and Michaelowa, K., 2010. Climate business for poverty reduction? The role of the
World Bank. CIS Working Paper 59, Center for Comparative and International Studies,
Zurich, Switzerland, 23 pp.
Milder, J.C., Scherr, S. and Bracer, C., 2010. Trends and future potential of payment for
environmental services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecology and
Society 15(2):4, 19 pp.
Minang, P.A., McCall, M.K. and Bressers, H.Th.A., 2007. Community capacity for implementing
Clean Development Mechanism projects within community forests in Cameroon.
Environmental Management 39, 615-630.
Minang, P.A. and van Noordwijk, M., 2013. Design challenges for achieving reduced emissions
from deforestation and forest degradation through conservation: Leveraging multiple
paradigms at the tropical forest margins. Land Use Policy 31, 61-70.
Minang, P.A., Van Noordwijk, M., Duguma, L.A., Alemagi, D., Trong H.D., Bernard, F., Agung, P.
et al., 2014. REDD+ readiness progress across countries: Time for reconsideration.
Climate Policy 14(6), 685-708.
Mitlin, D., Hickey, S. and Bebbington, A., 2007. Reclaiming development? NGOs and the challenge
of alternatives. World Development 35(10), 1699-1720.
Mohammed, E.Y., 2011. Pro-poor benefit distribution in REDD+: Who gets what and why does it
matter? REDD+ Working Paper, International Institute for Environment and
Development, London, UK, 36 pp.
Morel, A.C. and Morel, B.F., 2012. How could carbon credits for reducing deforestation compete
with returns from palm oil: A proposal for a more flexible REDD+ valuation tool. Journal
of Sustainable Forestry 31(1-2), 11-28.
Moreno, C., Speich Chassé, D. and Furh, L., 2015. Carbon metrics – Global abstractions and
ecological epistemicide, an essay. Publication Series Ecology 42, Heinrich Böll Foundation,
Berlin, Germany, 60 pp.
Morgera, E. and Tsioumani, E., 2010. The evolution of benefit sharing: Linking biodiversity and
community livelihoods. Review of European Community and International Environmental
Law 19(2), 150-173.
Murray, B.C., 2008. Leakage from avoided deforestation compensation policy: Concepts, empirical
evidence, and corrective policy options. Working Paper, Nicolas Institute for
Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University, US, 34 pp.
Mustalahti, I. and Tassa, D.T., 2012. Analysis of three crucial elements of REDD+ in participatory
forest management. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27(2), 200-209.
Neeff, T. and Ascui, F., 2009. Lessons from carbon markets for effective REDD+ architecture.
Climate Policy 9, 306-315.
Neeff, T., Göhler, D. and Ascui, F., 2014. Finding a path for REDD+ between ODA and the
CDM. Climate Policy 14(2), 149-166.
Nelson, F., Foley, C., Foley, L.S., Leposo, A., Loure, E., Peterson, D., Peterson, M. et al., 2010.
Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in
Northern Tanzania. Conservation Biology 24(1), 78-85.
213
Nepstad, D.C., Soares-Filho, B., Merry, F., Moutinho, P., Rodrigues, H.O., Bowman, S.,
Schwartzman, S. et al., 2007. The costs and benefits of reducing carbon emissions from
deforestation and forest degradation in the Brazilian Amazon. Woods Hole Research
Centre, Falmouth, US, 32 pp.
Nepstad, D.C., McGrath, D.G. and Soares-Filho, B., 2011. Systemic conservation, REDD+, and
the future of the Amazon Basin. Conservation Biology 25(6), 1113-1116.
Newell, P., 2000. Climate change: Non-State actors and the politics of the greenhouse. Cambridge
University Press, UK, 236 pp.
Newell, P., 2012. Of markets and madness: Whose clean development will prevail at Rio+20? The
Journal of Environment & Development 21, 40-43.
Niles, J. O., Boyd, W., Lawlow, K., Myers Madeira, E. and Olander, L., 2009. Experience on the
ground, in the forests. International Forest Carbon and the Climate Change Challenge
Series – Brief 6, Nicholas Institute, Duke University, Durham, US, 7 pp.
Nillson, S. and Schopfhauser, W., 1995. The carbon-sequestration potential of a global afforestation
program. Climatic Change 30, 267-293.
Norgaard, R.B., 2010. Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder.
Ecological Economics 69, 1219-1227.
Novotny Couto Pereira, S., 2010. Payment for environmental services in the Amazon forest: How
can conservation and development be reconciled? The Journal of Environment &
Development 19(2), 171-190.
Nuzunda, E.F. and Mahuve, T.G., 2011. A SWOT analysis of mitigation of climate change through
REDD+. In Leal Filho, W. (Ed.), 2011. Experiences of climate change adaptation in
Africa. 201 Climate Change Management, Springer-Verlag Berlin, 201-216.
Okafor, O.C., 2006. Poverty, agency and resistance in the future of international law, an African
perspective. Third World Quarterly 27(5), 799-814.
Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H. and Schroeder, H., 2009. Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the
international regime. Global Environmental Politics 9(1), 58-79.
Okereke, C. and Dooley, K., 2010. Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to
avoided deforestation: Towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental
Change 20, 82-95.
Olsen, N. and J. Bishop, 2009. The financial costs of REDD+: Evidence from Brazil and
Indonesia. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 77 pp.
Ostrom, E. and Nagendra, H., 2006. Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on
the ground, and in the laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
103(51), 19224-19231.
Pagiola, S., 2008. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Environmental Economics
65, 212-224.
Palm, M., Ostwald, M. and Reilly, J., 2008. Land use and forestry based CDM in scientific peer-
reviewed literature pre-and post-COP 9 in Milan. International Environmental Agreements
8, 249-274.
Palmer, C., 2011. Property rights and liability for deforestation under REDD+: Implications for
‘permanence’ in policy design. Ecological Economics 70, 571-576.
Partzsch, L. and Ziegler, R., 2011. Social entrepreneurs as change agents: A case study on power
and authority in the water sector. International Environmental Agreements 11, 63-83.
Pattberg, P., 2005. What role for private rule-making in global environmental governance?
Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). International Environmental Agreements
5, 175-189.
Pattberg, P., 2006. Private governance and the South: Lessons from global forest policy. Third
World Quarterly 27(4), 579-593.
Pedroni, L., Dutschke, M., Streck, C. and Estrada Porrúa, M., 2009. Creating incentives for
avoiding further deforestation: The nested approach. Climate Policy 9(2), 207-220.
214
Pelletier, J., Kirby, KR. and Potvin, C., 2012. Significance of carbon stock uncertainties on emission
reductions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries. Forest
Policy and Economics 24, 3-11.
Pelletier, J., Busch, J. and Potvin, C., 2015. Addressing uncertainty upstream or downstream of
accounting for emissions reductions from deforestation and forest degradation. Climatic
Change 130, 635-648.
Peskett, L. And Harkin, Z., 2007. Risk and responsibility in reduced emissions from deforestation
and degradation. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 7 pp.
Peskett, L., Huberman, D., Bowen-Jones, E., Edwards, G. and Brown, J., 2008. Making REDD+
work for the poor. Overseas Development Institute and IUCN, London, UK, 80 pp.
Peskett, L., Schreckenberg, K. and Brown, J., 2011. Institutional approaches for carbon financing in
the forest sector: Learning lessons for REDD+ from forest carbon projects in Uganda.
Environmental Science & Policy 14(2), 216-229.
Peters-Stanley, M., Hamilton, K., Marcello, T. and Sjardin, M., 2011. Back to the future, state of the
voluntary carbon markets 2011. Bloomberg New Energy Finance and Forest Trends
Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, D.C., USA, 93 pp.
Peterson, A.L., Gallagher, L.A,, Huberman, D. and Mulder, I., 2012 Seeing REDD+: Reducing
emissions and conserving biodiversity by avoiding deforestation. Journal of Sustainable
Forestry 31(1-2), 29-58.
Pfaff, A., Robalino, J.A. and Sanchez-Azofeifa, A., 2008. Payments for environmental services:
Empirical analysis for Costa Rica. Working Papers Series, Terry Sanford Institute of Public
Policy, Duke University, US, 27 pp.
Phelps, J., Guerrero, M.C., Dalabajan, D.A., Young, B. and Webb, E.L., 2010. What makes a
REDD+ country? Global Environmental Change 20, 322-332.
Pirard, R. and Karsenty, A., 2009. Climate change mitigation: Should “avoided deforestation” be
rewarded? Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 434-455.
Pirard, R., 2012. Payments for Environmental Services (PES) in the public policy landscape:
“Mandatory” spices in the Indonesian recipe. Forest Policy and Economics 18, 23-29.
Pistorius, T., Schmitt, C.B., Benick, D. and Entenmann, S., 2010. Greening REDD+: Challenges
and opportunities for forest biodiversity conservation. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung
182(5/6), 82-98.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P., 2003. Common method biases in
behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal
of Applied Psychology 88(5), 879-903.
Pollini, J., 2009. Carbon sequestration for linking conservation and rural development in
Madagascar: The case of the Vohidrazana-Mantadia Corridor restoration and conservation
carbon project. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 322-342.
Porras, I., Barton, D.N., Miranda, M. and Chacon-Cascante, A., 2013. Learning from 20 years of
payments for ecosystems services in Costa Rica. International Institute for Environment
and Development, London, UK, 76 pp.
Potvin, C., Guay, B. and Pedroni, L., 2008. Is reducing emissions from deforestation financially
feasible? A Panamanian case study. Climate Policy 8, 23-40.
Putz, F.E. and Zuidema, P.A., 2008. REDD+ and reduced impact logging. In: Holopainen, J. and
Wit, M. (Eds)., 2008. Financing sustainable forest management. Tropenbos International,
Wageningen, the Netherlands, 155-158.
Putz, F.E. and Redford, K.H., 2009. Dangers of carbon-based conservation. Global Environmental
Change 19(4), 400-401.
PwC (Price Waterhouse Coopers), 2012. Assessing options for effective mechanisms to share
benefits: Insights for REDD+ initiatives. Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington,
D.C., USA, 168 pp.
Rademaekers, K., Eichler, L., Obersteiner, M., Berg, J. and Havlik, P., 2010. Study on the evolution
of some deforestation drivers and their potential impacts on the costs of an avoiding
215
deforestation scheme. Report to the European Commission (Directorate-general for
Environment), COWI Consortium, ECORYS-IIASA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 74 pp.
Rayner, J., Buck, A., and Katila, P. (Eds.), 2010. Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of
international forest governance. A global assessment report prepared by the Global Forest
Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime. IUFRO World Series 28, Vienna,
Austria, 172 pp.
Redford, K.H. and Adams, W.A., 2009. Payments for ecosystem services and the challenge of
saving nature. Conservation Biology 23(4), 785-787.
Rendón Thompson, O.R., Paavola, J., Healey, J.R., Jones, J.P.G.R., and Torres, J., 2013. Reducing
emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+): Transaction costs of six
Peruvian projects. Ecology and Society 18(1):17, 12 pp.
Resosudarmo, I.A.P., Atmadja, S., Ekaputri, A.D., Intarini, D.Y. and Indriatmoko Pangestuti Astri,
Y., 2014. Does tenure security lead to REDD+ project effectiveness? Reflections from five
emerging sites in Indonesia. World Development 55, 68-83.
Reynolds, T.W., 2012. Institutional determinants of success among forestry-based carbon
sequestration projects in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development 40(3), 542-554.
Richards, M., 2000. Can sustainable tropical forestry be made profitable? The potential and
limitations of innovative incentive mechanisms. World Development 28(6), 1001-1016.
Richards, K.R. and Stokes, C., 2004. A review of forest carbon sequestration cost studies: A dozen
years of research. Climatic Change 63, 1-48.
Richards, M. and Jenkins, M., 2007. Potential and challenges of payments for ecosystem services
from tropical forests. Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 8 pp.
Robinson, B.E., Holland, M.B. and Naughton-Treves, L., 2014. Does secure land tenure save
forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation.
Global Environmental Change 29, 281-293.
Rodriguez, L.C., Pascual, U., Murdian, R., Pazmino, N., and Whitten, S., 2011. Towards a unified
scheme for environmental and social protection: Learning from PES and CCT experiences
in developing countries. Ecological Economics 70, 2163-2174.
Roessing Neto, E., 2015. REDD+ as a tool of global forest governance. The International
Spectator 50(1), 60-73.
Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., Insaidoo, T. F. and Acheampong, E. 2013. Promising start, bleak outlook: The
role of Ghana's modified Taungya system as a social safeguard in timber legality
processes. Forest Policy and Economics 32, 57-67.
Ros-Tonen, M.A.F., Derkyi, M. and Insaidoo, T.F.G., 2014. From co-management to landscape
governance: Wither Ghana’s modified Taungya system? Forests 5, 2996-3021.
Rosendal, G.K., 2007. Norway in UN environmental policies: Ambitions and influence.
International Environmental Agreements 7, 439-455.
Rosendal, G.K. and Schei, P.J., 2014. How may REDD+ affect the practical, legal and institutional
framework for ‘payment for ecosystem services’ in Costa Rica? Ecosystem Services 9, 75-
82.
Royo, J., 2012. Agency and international relations, an alternative lens. E-International Relations,
http://www.e-ir.info/2012/08/28/agency-and-international-relations-an-alternative-lens/.
Rudel, T.K., Defries, R., Asner, G.P. and Laurance, W.F., 2009. Changing drivers of deforestation
and new opportunities for conservation. Conservation Biology 23(6), 1396-1405.
Salvini, G., Herold, M., De Sy, V., Kissinger, G., Brockhaus, M. and Skutsch, M., 2014. How
countries link REDD+ interventions to drivers in their readiness plans: Implications for
monitoring systems. Environmental Research Letters 9, 074004, 12 pp.
Sanchez-Azofeifa, G.A., Pfaff, A., Robalino, J.A. and Boomhower, J.P., 2007. Costa Rica’s payment
for environmental services program: Intention, implementation and impact. Conservation
Biology 21(5), 1165-1173.
Sandbrook, C., Nelson, F., Adams, W. and Agrawal, A., 2010. Carbon forests and the REDD+
paradox. Fauna & Flora International Oryx 44(3), 330-334.
216
Santilli, M., Moutinho, P., Schwartzman, S., Nepstad, D., Curran, L. and Nobre, C., 2005. Tropical
deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol: An editorial essay. Climatic Change 71(3), 267-276.
Saravesi, A., 2012. The human rights dimension of REDD+. Review of European Community and
International Environmental Law 21(2), 102-113.
Sasaki, N. and Putz, F.E., 2009. Critical need for new definitions of ‘forest’ and ‘forest degradation’
in global climate change agreements. Conservation Letters 2(5), 226-232.
Saunders, J., Ebeling, J. and Nussbaum, R., 2008. Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest
degradation (REDD+): Lessons from a governance perspective. Proforest, Oxford, UK,
19 pp.
Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Gerten, D., Stich, S., Cramer, W. and Prentice, C.I., 2006. Terrestrial
biosphere carbon storage under alternative climate projections. Climatic Change 74, 97-
122.
Schipper, E.L.F. and Boyd, E., 2006. UNFCCC COP 11 and COP/MOP 1, at last, some hope?
Journal of Environment & Development 15(1), 75-90.
Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E., 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual
analysis. Land Economics 68(3), 249-62.
Schlosberg, D., 2004. Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political
theories. Environmental Politics 13(3), 517-540.
Schroeder, H., 2010. Agency in international climate negotiations: The case of Indigenous Peoples
and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements 10, 317-332.
Schwarze, R., Niles, J. O. and Olander, J., 2002. Understanding and managing leakage in forest-
based GHG-mitigation projects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of
London A 360, 1685-1703.
Scrieciu, S.S., 2007. Can economic causes of tropical deforestation be identified at a global level?
Ecological Economics 62(3-4), 603-612.
Scriven, J.N.H., 2012. Preparing for REDD+: Forest governance challenges in Peru’s Central Selva.
Journal of Sustainable Forestry 31(4-5), 421-444.
Seymour, F.J. and Dubash, N.K., 2000. Right conditions: The World Bank, structural adjustment,
and forest policy reform. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 156.
Seymour, F.J., 2008. Forests, climate change, and human rights: Managing risks and trade-offs. In:
Humphreys, S. (Ed.). Human rights and climate change. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, UK, 207-237.
Seymour, F.J. and Forwand, E., 2010. Governing sustainable forest management in the new climate
regime. Wires Climate Change 1, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 803-810.
Shvidenko, A., Schepaschenko, D., McCallum, I. and Nilsson, S., 2011. Can the uncertainty of full
carbon accounting of forest ecosystems be made acceptable to policymakers? Climate
Change 103, 137-157.
Sierra, R. and Russman, E., 2006. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest
conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 59(2),
131-141.
Siikamaki, J. and Newbold, S.C., 2012. Potential biodiversity benefits from international programs
to reduce carbon emissions from deforestation. Ambio 41, 78-89.
Sikor, T., 2011. Financing household tree plantations in Vietnam: Current programmes and future
options. Working Paper 69, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 40 pp.
Simula, M., 2011. Analysis of REDD+ financing gaps and overlaps. REDD+ Partnership, FAO,
Rome, Italy, 99 pp.
Simula, M.A., 2015. Taking stock of the implementation of TFLET and REDD+ES thematic
programmes, Final report. ITTO, Yokohama, Japan, 127 pp.
Singh, P.P., 2008. Exploring biodiversity and climate change benefits of community-based forest
management. Global Environmental Change 18, 468-478.
Skutsch, M.M., 2005. Reducing carbon transaction costs in community based forestry management.
Climate Policy 5, 433-443.
217
Skutsch, M, Bird, N., Trines, E., Dutschke, M., Frumhoff, P., de Jong, B.H.J., van Laake, P. et al.,
2007. Clearing the way for reducing emissions from tropical deforestation. Environmental
Science and Policy 10, 322-334.
Skutsch, M.M., Zahabu, E. and Karky, B.S., 2009. Community forest management under REDD+:
policy conditions for equitable governance. Paper prepared for the 13th World Forestry
Congress, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 9 pp.
Skutsch, M.M. and McCall, M.K., 2010. Reassessing REDD+: Governance, markets and the hype
cycle, an editorial comment. Climate Change 100, 395-402.
Skutsch, M.M., Vickers, B., Georgiadou, Y. and McCall, M.K., 2011. Alternative models for carbon
payments to communities under REDD+: A comparison using the Polis model of actor
inducements. Environmental Science and Policy 14, 140-151.
Skutsch, M.M., Simon, C., Velazquez, A. and Fernandez, J.C., 2013. Rights to carbon and payments
for services rendered under REDD+: Options for the case of Mexico. Global
Environmental Change 23, 813-825.
Sloan, S., 2015. The development-driven forest transition and its utility for REDD+. Ecological
Economics 116, 1-11.
Smith, S and Scherr, S.J., 2003. Capturing the value of forest carbon for local livelihoods. World
Development 31(12), 2143-2160.
Smith, J. and Applegate, G., 2004. Could payments for forest carbon contribute to improved
tropical forest management? Forest Policy and Economics 6, 153-167.
Smouts, M.C., 2008. The issue of an international forest regime. International Forest Policy Review
10(3), 429-432.
Sobrevila, C. 2008. The role of Indigenous Peoples in biodiversity conservation, the natural but
often forgotten partners. World Bank, Washington D.C., USA, 84 pp.
Sohngen, B. and Mendelsohn, R., 2003. An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2), 448-457.
Sohngen, B., 2008. Paying for avoided deforestation – should we do it? Choices 23(1), 28-30.
Sommerville, M., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Rahajaharison, M. and Jones, J.P., 2010. Impact of a
community-based payment for environmental services intervention on forest use in
Menabe, Madagascar. Conservation Biology 24(6), 1488-1498.
Sotirov, M. and Memmler, M., 2012. The Advocacy Coalition Framework in natural resource policy
studies — Recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy and Economics 16, 51-
64.
Spence, C., Kulovesi, K., Gutierrez, M. and Munoz, M., 2008. Great expectations: Understanding
Bali and the climate change negotiations process. Review of European Community and
International Environmental Law 17(2), 142-153.
Srivastava, N., 2011. Changing dynamics of forest regulation: Coming full circle? Review of
European Community and International Environmental Law 20(2), 113-122.
Steg, L., De Groot, J.I.M., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W. and Siero, F., 2011. General antecedents
of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: The role of values, worldviews, and
environmental concern. Society & Natural Resources 24(4), 349-367.
Stephan, B., 2012. Bringing discourse to the market: The commodification of avoided
deforestation. Environmental Politics 21(4), 621-639.
Stephan, B. and Paterson, M., 2012. The politics of carbon markets, an introduction.
Environmental Politics 21(4), 545-562.
Stephenson, S., 2011. Does ODA grow on trees? A legal analysis of REDD+-ODA finance.
European Journal of Legal Studies 4(1), 81-101.
Stern, N.H., 2006. The Stern review: The economics of climate change. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK.
Stern, N.H., 2008. The economics of climate change. American Economic Review 98(2), 1-37.
Stevenson, H. and Dryzek, J.S., 2012. The discursive democratisation of global climate governance.
Environmental Politics 21(2), 189-210.
218
Stewart-Harawira, M., 2005. The new imperial order, indigenous responses to globalization. Huia
Publishers, Aotearoa-New Zealand.
Streck, C., Robert, O. S., Janson-Smith, T., and Tarasofsky, R. (Eds.), 2008. Climate change and
forests: Emerging policy and market opportunities. Royal Institute of International Affairs,
London, UK, 346 pp.
Streck, C., Gomez-Echeverri, L., Gutman, P., Loisel, C. and Werksman, J. 2009a. REDD+
institutional options assessment, developing an efficient, effective and equitable
institutional framework for REDD+ under the UNFCCC. Meridian Institute, Washington,
D.C., USA, 40 pp.
Streck, C., Tuerk, A. and Schlamadinger, B., 2009b. Forestry offsets in emissions trading systems: A
link between systems? Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14, 455-
463.
Sullivan, S., 2009. Green capitalism, and the cultural poverty of constructing nature as service
provider. Radical Anthropology 3, 18-27.
Sun, B. and Sohngen, B., 2009. Set-asides for carbon sequestration: Implications for permanence
and leakage. Climatic Change 96, 409-419.
Sun Park, M., Sekyoung Choi, E. and Young, Y., 2013. REDD+ as an international cooperation
strategy under the global climate change regime. Forest Science and Technology 9(4), 213-
224.
Sunderlin, W.D., Hatcher, J. and Liddle, M., 2008. From exclusion to ownership? Rights and
Resources Initiative, Washington, D.C., USA, 64 pp.
Sunderlin, W.D., Sills, E.O., Duchelle, A.E, Ekaputri, A.D., Kweka, D., Toniolo, M., Ball, S. et al.,
2016. REDD+ at a critical juncture: Assessing the limits of polycentric governance for
achieving climate change mitigation. International Forestry Review 17(4), 400-413.
Swickard, N. and Carnahan, K., 2010. Integrating project and national REDD+: The importance of
the private sector. In Zhu, X., Ravnkilde, L. and De Lopez, M. (Eds.), 2010. Pathways for
implementing REDD+, experiences from carbon markets and communities. UNEP Risoe
Centre, Roskilde, Denmark, 71-86.
Tacconi, L., 2012. Redefining payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 73, 29-
36.
Tacconi, L., Mahanty, S. and Suich, H., 2013. The livelihood impacts of payments for
environmental services and implications for REDD+. Society & Natural Resources 26(6),
733-744.
The Munden Project, 2011. REDD+ and forest carbon, market critique and recommendations.
The Munden Project, New York, USA, 31 pp.
Thompson, A., 2006. Management under anarchy: The international politics of climate change.
Climate Change 78, 7-29.
Thompson, M.C., Baruah, M. and Carr, E.R., 2011. Seeing REDD+ as a project of environmental
governance. Environmental Science & Policy 14(2), 100-110.
Tomaselli, I., 2006. Brief study on funding and finance for forestry and forest-based sector, final
report. United Nations Forum on Forest, UN, New York, 63 pp.
Trivedi, M., Mitchell, A., and Mardas, N., 2008. The utility value of rainforests. In Holopainen, J.
and Wit, M. (Eds)., 2008. Financing sustainable forest management. Tropenbos
International, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 163-166.
Underdal, A., 2011. Strategies in international regime negotiations: Reflecting background
conditions or shaping outcomes? International Environmental Agreements 12, 129-144.
UNEP, 2002. Global Environmental Outlook 3. Earthscan, UK, 466 pp.
Unfcccint. (2017). Unfcccint. Retrieved 11 March, 2017, from
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2010/cop16/eng/07a01.pdf
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2017. Unfcccint. Glossary of Climate
Change Acronyms and Terms. Retrived 26 December 2016 from
http://unfccc.int/essential_background/glossary/items/3666.php.
219
Unruh, J.D., 2008. Carbon sequestration in Africa: The land tenure problem. Global
Environmental Change 18, 700-707.
Van Bodegom, A.J., Savenije, H. and Wit, M. (Eds.), 2009. Forests and climate change: Adaptation
and mitigation. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 160 pp.
Van der Hoff, R., Rajao, R., Leroy, P. and Boezeman, D., 2015. The parallel materialization of
REDD+ implementation discourses in Brazil. Forest Policy and Economics 55, 37-45.
Van Kooten, G.C., 2009. Biological carbon sequestration and carbon trading revisited. Climatic
Change 95, 449-463.
Vatn, A., Vedeld, P., Petursson, J. G. and Stenslie, E., 2009. The REDD+ direction. The potential
for reduced carbon emissions, biodiversity protection and enhanced development. A desk
study with focus on Tanzania and Uganda. Noragric Report 51, Norwegian University of
Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 140pp.
Vatn, A., 2010. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological
Economics 69, 1245-1252.
Vatn, A., Barton, D.N., Lindhjem, H., Movik, S., Ring, I and Santos, R., 2011. Can markets protect
biodiversity? An evaluation of different financial mechanisms. Noragric Report 60.
University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 105 pp.
Vatn, A. and Vedeld, P., 2011. Getting ready! A study of national governance structures for
REDD+. Noragric report 59. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, 43 pp.
Vatn, A. and Vedeld, P., 2013. National governance structures for REDD+. Global Environmental
Change 23, 422-432.
Villamor, G.B. and Lasco, R.D., 2009. Rewarding upland people for forest conservation:
Experience and lessons learned from case studies in the Philippines. Journal of Sustainable
Forestry 28(3-5), 304-321.
Visseren-Hamakers, I.J. and Glasbergen, P., 2006. Partnerships in forest governance. Global
Environmental Change 17(3-4), 408-419.
Vogler, J., 2003. Taking institutions seriously: How regimes can be relevant to multi-level
environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 3(2), 25-39.
Von der Goltz, J., 2009. High stakes in a complex game: A snapshot of the climate change
negotiating positions of major developing country emitters. Working Paper 177, Center for
Global Development, Washington, D.C., USA, 35 pp.
Von Moltke, K., 2002. Governments and international civil society in sustainable development: A
framework. International Environmental Agreements 2, 341-359.
Wang, Z. and Lu, Y., 2010. Compensation for the conversion of sloping farmland to forest in
China: A feasibility study of payment based on carbon sink. Journal of Environment &
Development 19(1), 28-41.
Wang, C., 2010. Lessons learned from global forestry projects in the carbon market. In Zhu, X.,
Ravnkilde, L. and De Lopez, M. (Eds.), 2010. Pathways for implementing REDD+,
experiences from carbon markets and communities. Carbon Market Perspectives, UNEP
Risoe Centre, Roskilde, Denmark, 17-28.
Wehkamp, J., Aquino, A., Fuss, S. and Reed, E.W., 2015. Analyzing the perception of deforestation
drivers by African policy makers in light of possible REDD+ policy responses. Forest
Policy and Economics 59, 7-18.
Weible, C.M., Sabatier, P.A. and Flowers, J., 2008. A guide to the advocacy coalition framework.
Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Second Edition,1(1), 1-10.
Weible, C.M., Heikkila, T., de Leon, P. and Sabatier, P.A., 2012. Understanding and influencing the
policy process. Policy Sciences 45, 1-21.
Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S, 2007. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in
developing countries (REDD+): Insights from the UNFCCC COP-13 in Bali. Iddri – Idées
pour le débat 12, Paris, France, 5 pp.
220
Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., Kongphan-Apirak, M. and Wunder, S., 2008. Reducing forest emissions in
the Amazon Basin, a review of drivers of land-use change and how payments for
environmental services can affect them. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia, 26 pp.
Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. and Kongphan-apirak, M., 2008. Emerging REDD+,aA preliminary
survey of demonstration and readiness activities. CIFOR Working Paper 46, CIFOR,
Bogor, Indonesia, 15 pp.
Wettestad, J., 2009. Interaction between EU carbon trading and the international climate regime:
Synergies and learning. International Environmental Agreements 9, 393-408.
White, A. and Martin, A., 2002. Who owns the worlds forests? Forest tenure and public forests in
transition. Forest Trends and Center for International Environmental Law, Washington,
D.C., USA, 32 pp.
Winkel, G., 2012. Foucault in the forests—A review of the use of ‘Foucauldian’ concepts in forest
policy analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 16, 81-92.
World Bank, 2003. World development report 2003: Sustainable development in a dynamic world:
Transforming institutions, growth, and quality of life. The World Bank, Washington, D.C,
USA, 273 pp.
World Bank, 2004. Sustaining forests: A development strategy. The World Bank, Washington D.C.,
USA, 28 pp.
World Bank, 2009. Gender in agriculture sourcebook. The World Bank, Washington D.C., USA,
764 pp..
World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development, 1999. Our forests, our future,
summary report, World Commission on Forests and Sustainable Development, Winnipeg,
Canada, 38 pp.
Wordpresscom, 2010. World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother
Earth. Retrieved 11 March, 2017, from
https://pwccc.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/peoples-agreement/
Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR, Bogor,
Indonesia, 32 pp.
Wunder, S., Bui Dung The and Ibarra, E., 2005. Payment is good control is better: Why payments
for forest environmental services in Vietnam have so far remained incipient. CIFOR,
Bogor, Indonesia, 75 pp.
Wunder, S., 2006. Are direct payments for environmental services spelling doom for sustainable
forest management in the tropics? Ecology and Society 11(2): 23, 12 pp.
Wunder, S., 2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation.
In Conservation Biology 21(1), 48-58.
Wunder, S. and Albán, M., 2008. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of
Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics 65(4), 685-698.
Wunder, S., Engel, S. and Pagiola, S., 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for
environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological
Economics 65(4), 834-852.
Wunder, S. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S., 2009. Payments for ecosystem services: A new way of
conserving biodiversity in forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28(3-5), 576-596.
Wwwunorg. (2017). Wwwunorg. Retrieved 11 March, 2017, from
http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/5session_factsheet1.pdf
Yasmi, Y., Kelley, L., Murdiyarso, D. and Patel, T., 2012. The struggle over Asia’s forests: An
overview of forest conflict and potential implications for REDD+. International Forestry
Review 14(1), 99-109.
Young, O.R., 1991. Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions
in international society. International Organization 45(3), 281-308.
Zaballa Romero, M.E., Traerup, S., Wieben, E., Ravnkilde Moller, J. and Koch, A., 2013.
Economics of forest and forest carbon projects. Translating lessons learned into national
REDD+ implementation. UNEP Risoe, Nairobi, Kenya, 100 pp.
221
Zadek, S., 2011. Beyond climate finance: from accountability to productivity in addressing the
climate challenge. Climate Policy 11, 1058-1068.
Zhu, X., Ravnkilde, L. and De Lopez, M. (Eds.) 2010. Pathways for implementing REDD+,
experiences from carbon markets and communities. Carbon Market Perspectives, UNEP
Riso Centre, Roskilde, Denmark, 156 pp.