utilizing technology for performance assessment and ... · (cavanuagh et al, 2006) why use...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and
Concussion Management
Presented by
Louann Kuntz, ATC, PT, DPT, MEd
![Page 2: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Purpose
• To educate athletic trainers about diagnostic tools available to assess concussion, postural control, and sports injury risk.
• To demonstrate how the assessment of postural control can assist with return to play decisions after a concussion.
• To learn about diagnostic tools available to the athletic trainer to aid in assessment of the concussed athlete and assessing sports performance.
![Page 3: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Up to 3.8 million sports or recreation-related concussions occur in the US each year. (Langlois, 2006)
• Individuals with a history of concussion are at an increased risk of sustaining a subsequent concussion. (Guskiewicz, 2003)
• Duration of symptoms are highly variable lasting several minutes to days, weeks, months, or longer. (Guskiewicz et al, 2003), (Field et al, 2003)
Magnitude of the Problem
![Page 4: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Magnitude
• No “gold standard” exists for concussion assessment.
• Symptoms or deficits that continue beyond three months may be a sign of post concussion syndrome. (Kashluba et al, 2006)
• Return to play time frames are highly variable and multifactoral. (Herring et al, 2011)
• With proper diagnosis and management, most patients with MTBI recover fully. (Kushner,
1998)
![Page 5: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Children and Adolescents
• Research shows that recovery time may be longer for children and adolescents.
![Page 6: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Quantifying Postural Instabilities
• Most concussions do not involve the loss of consciousness.
• Detect the symptoms (including postural instability) and determine how long the symptoms last rather than grading the severity of the concussion based on loss of consciousness. (Cantu, 2001)
![Page 7: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Quantifiable Postural Instability
• Zurich Consensus Statement on Concussion: (McCrory et al., 2009)
o Postural stability tests should be considered reliable and valid in assessing motor components of neurologic functioning.
• Postural stability assessment may enhance clinical management of concussed athletes. (Guskiewicz, 2003; McCrea et al., 2003; McCrory et al., 2009)
• Postural control testing often reveals deficits even when symptoms are not apparent. (Cavanuagh et al, 2006)
![Page 8: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Why Use Technology?
• “The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a return-to-play decision after a mild TBI poses a quandary for sports medicine clinicians.” (Guskiewicz, 2001)
• Clinicians are beginning to manage mild TBI utilizing alternative means of identifying deficits after a suspected head injury.
• Use of technology may help to prevent premature return to competition and subsequent serious injury. (McCrea M et al, 1998;
Guskiewicz et al, 2001; Guskiewicz KM, 2003; Notebaert AJ, et al, 2005)
![Page 9: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Balance Assessment
• Balance is the ability to maintain equilibrium by positioning the center of gravity over the base of support. (Murray et al, 1975)
• 49% of your balance comes from the ankles. (Tinnetti, 1994)
• Athletes with cerebral concussion demonstrated acute balance deficits, likely the result of not using information from the vestibular and visual systems effectively. (Guskiewicz et al., 2001)
• Complete recovery of postural control has become an important criteria for return to play.
![Page 10: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Objective Assessment of Postural Stability and Balance
BALANCE MASTER BY NEUROCOM BESS TEST
![Page 11: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Equilibrate by Balance Engineering
• Portable system that uses force plate technology and cameras to capture a full body assessment. - Remember 49% from the
ankles. What about the other 51%?
• Generate objective data and compares to age specific normative data.
![Page 12: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Equilibrate System
![Page 13: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Equilibrate Sample Report
![Page 14: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Clinical Observation and Use of Technology
• Postural control may not be fully observable.
• Use of technology such as Balance Engineering’s Equilibrate System may provide objective quantifiable data.
• An evidence-based approach to concussion management is presented with a specific focus on return-to-play issues.
![Page 15: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Manual Muscle Testing
• RW Bohannon in 2005 demonstrated that dynamometry is superior to manual muscle testing.
• Grading strength may be unreliable. (Bohannon,
RW. 2005)
• We may be missing or placing athletes at risk.
![Page 16: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Case Study - 11 Year Old 11 Months After Injury
• Sustained concussion with loss of consciousness.
• Patient self reports feeling normal @ 11 months
• Physician reports - Occasional headaches
- Cranial nerves II through XII intact
- No ataxia
- No dysdiadochokinesis
- Negative pronator drift
- Tandem stance only a few seconds
- Finger to nose fluid
![Page 17: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Plantarflexion Dorsiflexion
Knee Extension Knee Flexion
Objective Testing Versus Manual Muscle Testing
![Page 18: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Objective Strength
• Plantar flexion R =10.7 lbs; L = 9.7lbs
– Right is 10.9% greater
• Dorsi flexion R = 7.7lbs; L = 7.8lbs
– Left is .7% greater
• Knee Extension R = 40.6lbs; L = 32.6
– Right is 24.5% greater
• Knee Flexion R = 22.7lbs; L = 19.8lbs
– Right is 14.3% greater
![Page 19: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Functional and Objective Strength Testing
• Rapid Toe Tapping 10 Seconds
• Normal = 47 reps – Right 36 reps
– Left 29 reps (dyskinesia noted)
• Dorsi flexion
– Left .7% greater
• Plantar flexion
– Right 10.9% greater
• Correlates to poor strength on Left
![Page 20: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Functional and Objective Strength Testing
• Sit to Stand 30 sec. Normal 30 in 30 sec. – 12/10/11 = 21 reps
– Right Knee extension is 24.5% greater
![Page 21: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Equilibrate Initial Scores 11 Months After Concussion
![Page 22: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Equilibrate Assessment
TEST TYPE 12/21/12
Age
Group
Norms
Percent
of Norm
Two feet Eyes Open (EO) 95.81 95.32 +1%
Two feet Eyes Closed (EC) 73.43 94.24 -28%
Right foot EO 27.19 90.31 -232%
Right Foot EC 16.68 71.93 -331%
Left foot EO 30.71 90.31 -194%
Left foot EC 39.11 71.93 -84%
Right foot forward EO 84.68 95.05 -12%
Right foot forward EC 73.14 91.88 -26%
Left foot forward EO 90.14 95.05 -5%
Left foot forward EC 68.36 91.88 -34%
• Poor performance on all but one test types.
• Needed upper extremity support for single leg tasks.
• Additionally patient had weakness in bilateral plantar flexors and headache induced with sit to stand 30 second test.
![Page 23: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
1 Month Later BTE Primus Isometric Testing
• Dorsi flexion
–Left 100.7% increase
–Right 31.7% increase
![Page 24: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
BTE Primus Isometric Testing
• Plantar flexion
–Left 83.1% increase
–Right 150.4% increase
![Page 25: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
BTE Primus Isometric Testing
• Knee Extension
–Left = 45.3% increase
–Right = 19.6% increase
![Page 26: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
BTE Primus Isometric Testing
• Knee Flexion
–Left = 42.6% increase
–Right = 37.7% increase
![Page 27: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Equilibrate Scores
![Page 28: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Results After 1 Month
TEST TYPE 12/21/12 1/31/12 % Change
Two feet Eyes Open (EO) 95.81 94.65 -1%
Two feet Eyes Closed (EC) 73.43 89.95 22%
Right foot EO 27.19 84.88 212%
Right Foot EC 16.68 69.66 318%
Left foot EO 30.71 87.63 185%
Left foot EC 39.11 69.31 77%
Right foot forward EO 84.68 95.58 13%
Right foot forward EC 73.14 87.11 19%
Left foot forward EO 90.14 93.75 4%
Left foot forward EC 68.36 91.95 35%
• Significant performance improvement.
• UE support not needed in single leg stance.
• Bilateral plantar flexors improved dramatically 98% on the left and 168% on the right.
• 30 second sit to stand improved from 21 up to 35 reps.
![Page 29: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
2nd Concussion Occurred
• Sent for Equilibrate testing
![Page 30: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Foot Etch Comparisons Two Feet Eyes Open
Initial concussion
12/21/11
11 month after inj.
2nd Concussion
3/21/12
Discharge
6/11/12
(3mo. Later)
![Page 31: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Foot Etch Comparisons Left Ft. Fwd EO and Right Ft. Fwd. EO
Discharge
6/11/12
2nd Concussion Evaluation
3/16/12
![Page 32: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Equilibrate Scores After 2nd Injury
Unable to perform
![Page 33: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Technology and Evidence Based Data
• Quantifying postural stability may help us better manage our athletes to keep them safe and make educated decisions based on evidence for return to play.
• Dynamometer testing vs. manual muscle testing.
• Deficits may be revealed that where not previously apparent.
![Page 34: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Case Study
• A 16 year old male
• Concussed 4 times:
• Initial: Oct. 2009
• 2nd: Jan. 2010
• 3rd: Oct. 2010
• 4th: Jul. 2011
• 5 weeks after 4th concussion athlete underwent Equilibrate testing
![Page 35: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Equilibrate Results
Injured athlete vs. his twin brother
Wojciechowski, JC. Use of Equilibrate System as a Diagnostic Tool for Concussion; and for Tracking Recovery after
Incident.- A Case Study. Henrietta, NY. 2011.
![Page 36: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Equilibrate Testing
Testing Results: Weeks 5-11 Post Trauma
Wojciechowski, JC. Use of Equilibrate System as a Diagnostic Tool for Concussion; and for Tracking
Recovery after Incident.- A Case Study. Henrietta, NY. 2011.
![Page 37: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Professional Ice Hockey Player
![Page 38: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Division I Male Basketball
![Page 39: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Dirt Bike Rider
Gagnon, JP. Concussion In Sports: An Educational In-Service With Case Study. Utica College 2012.
![Page 40: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
How Is This Technology Being Used?
• Balance and Concussion Assessment
• Balance Training and Rehabilitation
• Sports Performance Assessment
• ACL/Orthopedic Rehabilitation
- Pre-hab and Rehab
• Upper Extremity Rehabilitation
• Closed Chain UE Rehabilitation
• Low Back Rehabilitation
![Page 41: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Other Uses of Equilibrate for Sports Performance Testing
![Page 42: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Why Is Balance Important?
• Predictor of injury
– In a study by McGuine et al, 210 high school subjects were tested.
– Subjects with poor balance (high sway) suffered seven times more ankle sprains.
• “A number of studies have found that poor balance ability is significantly related to an increased risk of ankle injuries.” (Hrysomallis, 2007)
![Page 43: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Where Is This Technology Being Used?
• Professional athletics
• Naval Special Warfare Development Group
• Veteran’s Affairs
• Colleges
• High schools
• Private practices
![Page 44: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
More Examples
![Page 45: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Oregon Shift Test
![Page 46: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Injury Identification or Deficiency
SI Joint Dysfunction Healthy SI Joint
![Page 47: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
More Uses
Visual Cueing With Targets
![Page 48: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
As Simple Or As Complex As You Want
Creative Application of Technology
![Page 49: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Control and Proprioception
![Page 50: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
References 1. McCrea M, Kelly JP, Randolph C, et al. Standardized assessment of concussion (SAC):
on-site mental status evaluation of the athlete. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(2):27–35.
2. Guskiewicz KM. Postural stability assessment following concussion: one piece of the puzzle. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11(3):182–189.
3. Guskiewicz KM. Assessment of postural stability following sport related concussion. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2003;2(1):24–30.
4. Notebaert AJ, Guskiewicz KM. Current trends in athletic training practice for concussion assessment and management. J Athl Train. 2005;40(4):320–325.
5. Murray M, Seireg A, Sepic S. “Normal Postural Stability and Steadiness: Quantitative Assessment”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1975; 57A, pp 510 - 516.
6. Sahler CS, Greenwald BD. Traumatic brain injury in sports: a review. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012:659652. doi: 10.1155/2012/659652.
7. McCrory P, Johnston K, Meeuwisse W, et al. Summary and agreement statement of the 2nd International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Prague 2004. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;39(4):196–204.
8. Cantu RC (2001). "Posttraumatic Retrograde and Anterograde Amnesia: Pathophysiology and Implications in Grading and Safe Return to Play". Journal of Athletic Training 36 (3): 244–248.
9. Freeman MR, Dean ME, Hanham IF. The etiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1965; 47B(4):678-85.
10. Tinetti M, McAvay G, Garret P, et al: A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 331:821-827, 1994.
11. Patel, D. R., & Reddy, V. (2010). Sport-related concussion in adolescents. Pediatric clinics of North America, 57(3), 649–670. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2010.03.006
12. Kevin M. Guskiewicz, Scott E. Ross, and Stephen W. Marshall. Postural Stability and Neuropsychological Deficits After Concussion in Collegiate Athletes. J Athl Train. 2001 Jul-Sep; 36(3): 263–273.
![Page 51: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
References Cont.
13. Bohannon RW. Manual muscle testing: does it meet the standards of an adequate screening test? Clin Rehabil. 2005 Sep;19(6):662-7.
14. Langlois, J. A. Rutland-Brown, W., & Wald, M. M. (2006). The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: A brief overview. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 21, 375–378.
15. Field M, Collins MW, Lovell MR. Does age play a role in recovery from sports related concussion? A comparison of high school and collegiate athletes. Am J Pediatr. 2003;142:546–553.
16. Balance Engineering | Comprehensive Balance Solutions. (n.d.). Retrieved December 24, 2012, from http://balancengineering.com
17. Guskiewicz, Kevin M. (2003). Assessment of postural stability following sport-related concussion. Current sports medicine reports, 2(1), 24–30.
18. Herring, S. A., Cantu, R. C., Guskiewicz, K. M., Putukian, M., Kibler, W. B., Bergfeld, J. A., Boyajian-O’Neill, L. A., et al. (2011). Concussion (mild traumatic brain injury) and the team physician: A consensus statement--2011 update. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 43(12), 2412–2422. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182342e64
19. ImPACT Test: Sample Clinical Report. (n.d.). Retrieved December 7, 2012, from http://impacttest.com/about/sample_report
20. ImPACT-Testing & Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Tools. (n.d.). Retrieved December 7, 2012, from http://www.impacttest.com/
21. McCrea, M., Guskiewicz, K. M., Marshall, S. W., Barr, W., Randolph, C., Cantu, R. C., Onate, J. A., et al. (2003). Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players: The NCAA concussion study. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, 290(19), 2556–2563. doi:10.1001/jama.290.19.2556
![Page 52: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
References Cont. 22. McCrory, P., Meeuwisse, W., Johnston, K., Dvorak, J., Aubry, M., Molloy, M., & Cantu,
R. (2009). Consensus statement on concussion in sport - The 3rd international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2008. PM & R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 1(5), 406–420. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.03.010
23. Kashluba S, Paniak C, Casey JE. Persistent symptoms associated with factors identified by the WHO Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2008;22:195–208.
24. Alexander MP. Minor traumatic brain injury: A review of physiogenesis and psychogenesis. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 1997;2:177–187.
25. Kushner, David. "Mild traumatic brain injury: toward understanding manifestations and treatment." Archives of Internal Medicine 158.15 (1998): 1617..
26. McGuine, TA; Greene, JJ; Best, T; Leverson, G. Balance As a Predictor of Ankle Injuries in High School Basketball Players. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine: October 2000 - Volume 10 - Issue 4 - pp 239-244
27. Hrysomallis, Con. Relationship Between Balance Ability, Training and Sports Injury Risk. Sports Medicine: 2007 - Volume 37 - Issue 6 - pp 547-556
28. Gagnon, JP. Concussion In Sports: An Educational In-Service With Case Study. Utica College 2012.
29. Wojciechowski, JC. Use of Equilibrate System as a Diagnostic Tool for Concussion; and for Tracking Recovery after Incident.- A Case Study. Henrietta, NY. 2011.
![Page 53: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022011910/5f743b70ef6fba1a1f7783fc/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Demonstration and hands on use the
technology.