utilizing technology for performance assessment and ... · (cavanuagh et al, 2006) why use...

53
Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and Concussion Management Presented by Louann Kuntz, ATC, PT, DPT, MEd

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and

Concussion Management

Presented by

Louann Kuntz, ATC, PT, DPT, MEd

Page 2: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Purpose

• To educate athletic trainers about diagnostic tools available to assess concussion, postural control, and sports injury risk.

• To demonstrate how the assessment of postural control can assist with return to play decisions after a concussion.

• To learn about diagnostic tools available to the athletic trainer to aid in assessment of the concussed athlete and assessing sports performance.

Page 3: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

• Up to 3.8 million sports or recreation-related concussions occur in the US each year. (Langlois, 2006)

• Individuals with a history of concussion are at an increased risk of sustaining a subsequent concussion. (Guskiewicz, 2003)

• Duration of symptoms are highly variable lasting several minutes to days, weeks, months, or longer. (Guskiewicz et al, 2003), (Field et al, 2003)

Magnitude of the Problem

Page 4: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Magnitude

• No “gold standard” exists for concussion assessment.

• Symptoms or deficits that continue beyond three months may be a sign of post concussion syndrome. (Kashluba et al, 2006)

• Return to play time frames are highly variable and multifactoral. (Herring et al, 2011)

• With proper diagnosis and management, most patients with MTBI recover fully. (Kushner,

1998)

Page 5: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Children and Adolescents

• Research shows that recovery time may be longer for children and adolescents.

Page 6: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Quantifying Postural Instabilities

• Most concussions do not involve the loss of consciousness.

• Detect the symptoms (including postural instability) and determine how long the symptoms last rather than grading the severity of the concussion based on loss of consciousness. (Cantu, 2001)

Page 7: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Quantifiable Postural Instability

• Zurich Consensus Statement on Concussion: (McCrory et al., 2009)

o Postural stability tests should be considered reliable and valid in assessing motor components of neurologic functioning.

• Postural stability assessment may enhance clinical management of concussed athletes. (Guskiewicz, 2003; McCrea et al., 2003; McCrory et al., 2009)

• Postural control testing often reveals deficits even when symptoms are not apparent. (Cavanuagh et al, 2006)

Page 8: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Why Use Technology?

• “The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a return-to-play decision after a mild TBI poses a quandary for sports medicine clinicians.” (Guskiewicz, 2001)

• Clinicians are beginning to manage mild TBI utilizing alternative means of identifying deficits after a suspected head injury.

• Use of technology may help to prevent premature return to competition and subsequent serious injury. (McCrea M et al, 1998;

Guskiewicz et al, 2001; Guskiewicz KM, 2003; Notebaert AJ, et al, 2005)

Page 9: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Balance Assessment

• Balance is the ability to maintain equilibrium by positioning the center of gravity over the base of support. (Murray et al, 1975)

• 49% of your balance comes from the ankles. (Tinnetti, 1994)

• Athletes with cerebral concussion demonstrated acute balance deficits, likely the result of not using information from the vestibular and visual systems effectively. (Guskiewicz et al., 2001)

• Complete recovery of postural control has become an important criteria for return to play.

Page 10: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Objective Assessment of Postural Stability and Balance

BALANCE MASTER BY NEUROCOM BESS TEST

Page 11: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Equilibrate by Balance Engineering

• Portable system that uses force plate technology and cameras to capture a full body assessment. - Remember 49% from the

ankles. What about the other 51%?

• Generate objective data and compares to age specific normative data.

Page 12: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Equilibrate System

Page 13: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Equilibrate Sample Report

Page 14: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Clinical Observation and Use of Technology

• Postural control may not be fully observable.

• Use of technology such as Balance Engineering’s Equilibrate System may provide objective quantifiable data.

• An evidence-based approach to concussion management is presented with a specific focus on return-to-play issues.

Page 15: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Manual Muscle Testing

• RW Bohannon in 2005 demonstrated that dynamometry is superior to manual muscle testing.

• Grading strength may be unreliable. (Bohannon,

RW. 2005)

• We may be missing or placing athletes at risk.

Page 16: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Case Study - 11 Year Old 11 Months After Injury

• Sustained concussion with loss of consciousness.

• Patient self reports feeling normal @ 11 months

• Physician reports - Occasional headaches

- Cranial nerves II through XII intact

- No ataxia

- No dysdiadochokinesis

- Negative pronator drift

- Tandem stance only a few seconds

- Finger to nose fluid

Page 17: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Plantarflexion Dorsiflexion

Knee Extension Knee Flexion

Objective Testing Versus Manual Muscle Testing

Page 18: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Objective Strength

• Plantar flexion R =10.7 lbs; L = 9.7lbs

– Right is 10.9% greater

• Dorsi flexion R = 7.7lbs; L = 7.8lbs

– Left is .7% greater

• Knee Extension R = 40.6lbs; L = 32.6

– Right is 24.5% greater

• Knee Flexion R = 22.7lbs; L = 19.8lbs

– Right is 14.3% greater

Page 19: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Functional and Objective Strength Testing

• Rapid Toe Tapping 10 Seconds

• Normal = 47 reps – Right 36 reps

– Left 29 reps (dyskinesia noted)

• Dorsi flexion

– Left .7% greater

• Plantar flexion

– Right 10.9% greater

• Correlates to poor strength on Left

Page 20: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Functional and Objective Strength Testing

• Sit to Stand 30 sec. Normal 30 in 30 sec. – 12/10/11 = 21 reps

– Right Knee extension is 24.5% greater

Page 21: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Equilibrate Initial Scores 11 Months After Concussion

Page 22: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Equilibrate Assessment

TEST TYPE 12/21/12

Age

Group

Norms

Percent

of Norm

Two feet Eyes Open (EO) 95.81 95.32 +1%

Two feet Eyes Closed (EC) 73.43 94.24 -28%

Right foot EO 27.19 90.31 -232%

Right Foot EC 16.68 71.93 -331%

Left foot EO 30.71 90.31 -194%

Left foot EC 39.11 71.93 -84%

Right foot forward EO 84.68 95.05 -12%

Right foot forward EC 73.14 91.88 -26%

Left foot forward EO 90.14 95.05 -5%

Left foot forward EC 68.36 91.88 -34%

• Poor performance on all but one test types.

• Needed upper extremity support for single leg tasks.

• Additionally patient had weakness in bilateral plantar flexors and headache induced with sit to stand 30 second test.

Page 23: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

1 Month Later BTE Primus Isometric Testing

• Dorsi flexion

–Left 100.7% increase

–Right 31.7% increase

Page 24: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

BTE Primus Isometric Testing

• Plantar flexion

–Left 83.1% increase

–Right 150.4% increase

Page 25: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

BTE Primus Isometric Testing

• Knee Extension

–Left = 45.3% increase

–Right = 19.6% increase

Page 26: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

BTE Primus Isometric Testing

• Knee Flexion

–Left = 42.6% increase

–Right = 37.7% increase

Page 27: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Equilibrate Scores

Page 28: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Results After 1 Month

TEST TYPE 12/21/12 1/31/12 % Change

Two feet Eyes Open (EO) 95.81 94.65 -1%

Two feet Eyes Closed (EC) 73.43 89.95 22%

Right foot EO 27.19 84.88 212%

Right Foot EC 16.68 69.66 318%

Left foot EO 30.71 87.63 185%

Left foot EC 39.11 69.31 77%

Right foot forward EO 84.68 95.58 13%

Right foot forward EC 73.14 87.11 19%

Left foot forward EO 90.14 93.75 4%

Left foot forward EC 68.36 91.95 35%

• Significant performance improvement.

• UE support not needed in single leg stance.

• Bilateral plantar flexors improved dramatically 98% on the left and 168% on the right.

• 30 second sit to stand improved from 21 up to 35 reps.

Page 29: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

2nd Concussion Occurred

• Sent for Equilibrate testing

Page 30: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Foot Etch Comparisons Two Feet Eyes Open

Initial concussion

12/21/11

11 month after inj.

2nd Concussion

3/21/12

Discharge

6/11/12

(3mo. Later)

Page 31: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Foot Etch Comparisons Left Ft. Fwd EO and Right Ft. Fwd. EO

Discharge

6/11/12

2nd Concussion Evaluation

3/16/12

Page 32: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Equilibrate Scores After 2nd Injury

Unable to perform

Page 33: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Technology and Evidence Based Data

• Quantifying postural stability may help us better manage our athletes to keep them safe and make educated decisions based on evidence for return to play.

• Dynamometer testing vs. manual muscle testing.

• Deficits may be revealed that where not previously apparent.

Page 34: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Case Study

• A 16 year old male

• Concussed 4 times:

• Initial: Oct. 2009

• 2nd: Jan. 2010

• 3rd: Oct. 2010

• 4th: Jul. 2011

• 5 weeks after 4th concussion athlete underwent Equilibrate testing

Page 35: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Equilibrate Results

Injured athlete vs. his twin brother

Wojciechowski, JC. Use of Equilibrate System as a Diagnostic Tool for Concussion; and for Tracking Recovery after

Incident.- A Case Study. Henrietta, NY. 2011.

Page 36: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Equilibrate Testing

Testing Results: Weeks 5-11 Post Trauma

Wojciechowski, JC. Use of Equilibrate System as a Diagnostic Tool for Concussion; and for Tracking

Recovery after Incident.- A Case Study. Henrietta, NY. 2011.

Page 37: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Professional Ice Hockey Player

Page 38: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Division I Male Basketball

Page 39: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Dirt Bike Rider

Gagnon, JP. Concussion In Sports: An Educational In-Service With Case Study. Utica College 2012.

Page 40: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

How Is This Technology Being Used?

• Balance and Concussion Assessment

• Balance Training and Rehabilitation

• Sports Performance Assessment

• ACL/Orthopedic Rehabilitation

- Pre-hab and Rehab

• Upper Extremity Rehabilitation

• Closed Chain UE Rehabilitation

• Low Back Rehabilitation

Page 41: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Other Uses of Equilibrate for Sports Performance Testing

Page 42: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Why Is Balance Important?

• Predictor of injury

– In a study by McGuine et al, 210 high school subjects were tested.

– Subjects with poor balance (high sway) suffered seven times more ankle sprains.

• “A number of studies have found that poor balance ability is significantly related to an increased risk of ankle injuries.” (Hrysomallis, 2007)

Page 43: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Where Is This Technology Being Used?

• Professional athletics

• Naval Special Warfare Development Group

• Veteran’s Affairs

• Colleges

• High schools

• Private practices

Page 44: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

More Examples

Page 45: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Oregon Shift Test

Page 46: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Injury Identification or Deficiency

SI Joint Dysfunction Healthy SI Joint

Page 47: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

More Uses

Visual Cueing With Targets

Page 48: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

As Simple Or As Complex As You Want

Creative Application of Technology

Page 49: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Control and Proprioception

Page 50: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

References 1. McCrea M, Kelly JP, Randolph C, et al. Standardized assessment of concussion (SAC):

on-site mental status evaluation of the athlete. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(2):27–35.

2. Guskiewicz KM. Postural stability assessment following concussion: one piece of the puzzle. Clin J Sport Med. 2001;11(3):182–189.

3. Guskiewicz KM. Assessment of postural stability following sport related concussion. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2003;2(1):24–30.

4. Notebaert AJ, Guskiewicz KM. Current trends in athletic training practice for concussion assessment and management. J Athl Train. 2005;40(4):320–325.

5. Murray M, Seireg A, Sepic S. “Normal Postural Stability and Steadiness: Quantitative Assessment”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1975; 57A, pp 510 - 516.

6. Sahler CS, Greenwald BD. Traumatic brain injury in sports: a review. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012:659652. doi: 10.1155/2012/659652.

7. McCrory P, Johnston K, Meeuwisse W, et al. Summary and agreement statement of the 2nd International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Prague 2004. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;39(4):196–204.

8. Cantu RC (2001). "Posttraumatic Retrograde and Anterograde Amnesia: Pathophysiology and Implications in Grading and Safe Return to Play". Journal of Athletic Training 36 (3): 244–248.

9. Freeman MR, Dean ME, Hanham IF. The etiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1965; 47B(4):678-85.

10. Tinetti M, McAvay G, Garret P, et al: A multifactorial intervention to reduce the risk of falling among elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 331:821-827, 1994.

11. Patel, D. R., & Reddy, V. (2010). Sport-related concussion in adolescents. Pediatric clinics of North America, 57(3), 649–670. doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2010.03.006

12. Kevin M. Guskiewicz, Scott E. Ross, and Stephen W. Marshall. Postural Stability and Neuropsychological Deficits After Concussion in Collegiate Athletes. J Athl Train. 2001 Jul-Sep; 36(3): 263–273.

Page 51: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

References Cont.

13. Bohannon RW. Manual muscle testing: does it meet the standards of an adequate screening test? Clin Rehabil. 2005 Sep;19(6):662-7.

14. Langlois, J. A. Rutland-Brown, W., & Wald, M. M. (2006). The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: A brief overview. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 21, 375–378.

15. Field M, Collins MW, Lovell MR. Does age play a role in recovery from sports related concussion? A comparison of high school and collegiate athletes. Am J Pediatr. 2003;142:546–553.

16. Balance Engineering | Comprehensive Balance Solutions. (n.d.). Retrieved December 24, 2012, from http://balancengineering.com

17. Guskiewicz, Kevin M. (2003). Assessment of postural stability following sport-related concussion. Current sports medicine reports, 2(1), 24–30.

18. Herring, S. A., Cantu, R. C., Guskiewicz, K. M., Putukian, M., Kibler, W. B., Bergfeld, J. A., Boyajian-O’Neill, L. A., et al. (2011). Concussion (mild traumatic brain injury) and the team physician: A consensus statement--2011 update. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 43(12), 2412–2422. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182342e64

19. ImPACT Test: Sample Clinical Report. (n.d.). Retrieved December 7, 2012, from http://impacttest.com/about/sample_report

20. ImPACT-Testing & Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Tools. (n.d.). Retrieved December 7, 2012, from http://www.impacttest.com/

21. McCrea, M., Guskiewicz, K. M., Marshall, S. W., Barr, W., Randolph, C., Cantu, R. C., Onate, J. A., et al. (2003). Acute effects and recovery time following concussion in collegiate football players: The NCAA concussion study. JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, 290(19), 2556–2563. doi:10.1001/jama.290.19.2556

Page 52: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

References Cont. 22. McCrory, P., Meeuwisse, W., Johnston, K., Dvorak, J., Aubry, M., Molloy, M., & Cantu,

R. (2009). Consensus statement on concussion in sport - The 3rd international conference on concussion in sport held in Zurich, November 2008. PM & R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 1(5), 406–420. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.03.010

23. Kashluba S, Paniak C, Casey JE. Persistent symptoms associated with factors identified by the WHO Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2008;22:195–208.

24. Alexander MP. Minor traumatic brain injury: A review of physiogenesis and psychogenesis. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 1997;2:177–187.

25. Kushner, David. "Mild traumatic brain injury: toward understanding manifestations and treatment." Archives of Internal Medicine 158.15 (1998): 1617..

26. McGuine, TA; Greene, JJ; Best, T; Leverson, G. Balance As a Predictor of Ankle Injuries in High School Basketball Players. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine: October 2000 - Volume 10 - Issue 4 - pp 239-244

27. Hrysomallis, Con. Relationship Between Balance Ability, Training and Sports Injury Risk. Sports Medicine: 2007 - Volume 37 - Issue 6 - pp 547-556

28. Gagnon, JP. Concussion In Sports: An Educational In-Service With Case Study. Utica College 2012.

29. Wojciechowski, JC. Use of Equilibrate System as a Diagnostic Tool for Concussion; and for Tracking Recovery after Incident.- A Case Study. Henrietta, NY. 2011.

Page 53: Utilizing Technology for Performance Assessment and ... · (Cavanuagh et al, 2006) Why Use Technology? •“The lack of objective and quantifiable information on which to base a

Demonstration and hands on use the

technology.