Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism Learning Objectives:- (long term)1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness

principle’.2. To understand the similarities and differences

between Bentham and Mill. 3. Understand the distinction between Act and Rule

Utilitarianism.4. Discuss how appropriate these labels are for

Bentham and Mill.5. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of

Utilitarianism.

This lesson’s objectives are…To understand the principle of

utility.To be able to explain the

significance of the hedonic calculus.To be confident with Jeremy

Bentham’s utilitarianism theory.To understand what ‘Act

Utilitarianism’ means.

Utilitarianism- Key PointsBrief Intro… A teleological theory. But, what does this

mean? Teleological theories look at the

consequences- the results of an action- to decide whether it is right or wrong.

Consequentialist theory- someone who decides whether an action is good or bad by its consequences.

Jeremy Bentham He was concerned with

social and legal reform & he wanted to develop an ethical theory which established whether something was good or bad according to its benefit for the majority of people.

He called this the principle of utility.

Utility= the usefulness of the results of actions.

1

2

Bentham… Bentham equated happiness with pleasure and the

absence of pain. This was an empirical observation - people desire

pleasure and seek to avoid pain. His scientific mind led him to believe that the study of

ethics could be undertaken in a practical way, carefully measuring the possible consequences or outcomes of an action before deciding which choice to take.

Bentham’s theories led to extensive social reform affecting Parliament, criminal law, the jury system, prisons, savings banks, cheap postage etc, etc.

What was revolutionary about Bentham’s theory was that it resulted in all people being considered when making laws. His hedonic calculus was especially helpful in determining how to measure different amounts of pleasure.

Principle of UtilityOften expressed as,

“the greatest good of the greatest number”.

Good = happiness or pleasure. So, an act is right or wrong according to the good or bad results that results from the act and the good act is the most

pleasurable. Quantitative= focuses on the greatest number.

Bentham’s Approach The theory is based on ancient hedonism,

which pursued physical pleasure and avoided physical pain.

Moral acts= maximize pleasure/ minimize pain Utilitarian calculus.

So, an act = moral, if it brings the greatest amount of pleasure and least pain.

Pain vs. pleasure Bentham, “The principle of utility aims to

promote happiness which is the supreme ethical value. Nature has placed us under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure. An act is ‘right’ if it delivers more pleasure than pain and ‘wrong’ if it brings about more pain than pleasure.”

Simple equation Happiness = pleasure minus pain.

Pleasure vs. Happiness “Actions are right in

proportion when they tend to promote happiness, wrong when they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” When Bentham talks about happiness, he refers to pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the absence of pleasure.

According to Bentham's theory, the rightness of an action entirely depends on the value of its consequences. That is why the theory is also described as consequentialist.

Hedonism

The view that pleasure is

the chief ‘good’.

Measure HedonismThink:

If you were to measure pleasure (Hedonism), how

would you do it? What would you look for?

Hedonic CalculusHelps us choose the good thing to do and work out

the possible consequences of an action. P.R.R.I.C.E.D = acronym. Purity – how free from pain is it? Remoteness – how near is it? Richness – to what extent will it lead to other

pleasures? Intensity – how powerful is it? Certainty – how likely it is to result in pleasure? Extent – how many people does it affect? Duration – how long will it last?

Hedonic Calculus & Euthanasia Bentham's Hedonic Calculus can be used to weigh up the

pleasure and pain caused by two courses of action - in this case, helping someone to die, or not doing so.

Bentham would consider the Intensity of the pain and its Duration. He would have to weigh that against the number of people affected (Extent), and consider whether keeping someone alive would lead to other pleasures (Richness). He would also need to add up the amount of other 'pains' the patient would face e.g. loss of dignity (Purity), and consider the chances that there' might be a cure or treatment in the future (Certainty). The pain is immediate, while possible future benefits are Remote.

In most cases, the degree of pain is so great that Bentham's theory would support euthanasia.

Act Utilitarianism A teleological theory that uses the

outcome of an action to determine whether it is good or bad.

Wrap up On the piece of paper, write one thing you have

learned today… Could be a concept you are now familiar with.

Or, a new key term in your vocabulary.

A theory that you are more confident in understanding.

Developed an academic/exam skill.

If nothing, be honest. But say why you feel nothing.