ust faculty union vs. national labor relations commission, 188 scra 400(1990

Upload: mei-suyat

Post on 22-Feb-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    1/11

    400

    SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

    UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Rlations Co!!ission

    ".R. No. #$##%. Au&ust '( )$$0.*

    UST FACULT+ UN,ON( -titionr( vs. NAT,ONAL LAOR RELAT,ONS COMM,SS,ON(UN,/ERS,T+ OF SANTO TOMAS( NORERTO CAST,LLO( NORMA LERMA( TERES,TACENDANA an D,ON,S,O CAE1ON( rs-onnts2

    Labor Rlations2 Dis!issals2 T3 o-inion o t3 union is not binin& on t3 U.S.T.aut3oritis2 Dnial o 5tnsion o a rtir rsts 6it3 t3 !-loyr( UST.7T3 Courta&rs 6it3 t3 -osition o t3 UST t3at t3 r8uir consultation 6it3 t3 Union as-rovi in t3 CA s3oul b intr-rt to !an as on 63ic3 is avisory inc3aractr an as suc3( t3 o-inion o t3 Union is not binin& on t3 USTaut3oritis. T3 9nal say as to t3 nial o 5tnsion o a rtir still rsts 6it3 t3!-loyr( t3 UST.

    Sa!2 Sa!2 Sa!2 "rouns or a rtir to b &rant an 5tnsion o srvic.7Unr t3 or&oin& ruls( or a rtir to b &rant 5tnsion( 3 !ust a--ly in6ritin& to t3 Dan o t3 coll& to 63ic3 3 or s3 is a:liat. ;is a--lication issub

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    2/11

    PET,T,ON to rvi6 t3 cision o t3 National Labor Rlations Co!!ission.

    T3 acts ar stat in t3 o-inion o t3 Court

    ???????????????

    * F,RST D,/,S,ON.

    40)

    /OL. )##( AU"UST '( )$$0

    40)

    UST Faculty Union us. National Labor Rlations Co!!ission

    Euaro S. Mari@o( r. or -titionr.

    Aba( La@o B Associats or -rivat rs-onnts.

    "ANCA+CO( .

    T3 ri&3t o a union to intrvn in t3 5tnsion o t3 srvic o a rtir!-loy is t3 8ustion sub!itt in t3is -tition.

    On May )( )$#'( t3 UST Faculty Union Union or s3ort an t3 Univrsity o Sto.To!as UST or s3ort ntr into a collctiv bar&ainin& a&r!nt 63ic3-rovi as ollo6s

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    3/11

    GSction ). Rtir!nt a&.7lt is 3rby a&r an sti-ulat t3at t3 co!-ulsoryrtir!nt a& or aculty !!brs is '' yars( -rovi t3at aculty !!brs 63o3av rac3 t3 a& o '% yars !ay b &rant 5tnsion o tnur unlss t3yar -3ysically inca-acitat or ar !anistly in:cint or inco!-tnt( or arot3r6is r!ov or caus. T3y s3all continu to n

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    4/11

    UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Rlations Co!!ission

    cision 6as rnr by Labor Arbitr invnio /. ;r!o&ns on Dc!br )%()$## is!issin& t3 cas or lac= o !rit. T3 Union a--al to t3 -ublic

    rs-onnt 63ic3 in u cours -ro!ul&at a rsolution on un K0( )$#$a:r!in& t3 a--al cision. A !otion or rconsiration o sai cision 9lby -titionr 6as ni in a rsolution at S-t!br 4()$#$.

    ;nc( t3 3rin -tition 63r it is all& t3at t3 -ublic rs-onnt act 6it3&rav abus o iscrtion a!ountin& to lac= o

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    5/11

    J Pa&s #I$( Rollo.

    40K

    /OL. )##( AU"UST '( )$$0

    40K

    UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Rlations Co!!ission

    by t3 univrsity in consultation 6it3 t3 Union or until t3y ar valily s-aratro! t3 srvic2 an 4 t3at t3 -rio o 5tn srvic s3all not b critor -ur-oss o rtir!nt.

    ,t is i!-ortant to stat t3at u-on t3 co!-ulsory rtir!nt o an !-loy oro:cial in t3 -ublic or -rivat srvic 3is !-loy!nt is ! tr!inat. T3!attr o 5tnsion o srvic o suc3 !-loy or o:cial is arss to t3 soun

    iscrtion o t3 !-loyr. ,t is a -rivil& only t3 !-loyr can &rant.

    ,n t3 -rsnt cas( unr t3 rul aorstat( a !!br o t3 aculty o UST 63orac3s t3 a& o '% is rtir or s-arat ro! t3 srvic t3rby. ;o6vr( t3UST !ay &rant 5tnsion o tnur to suc3 a rtir unlss t3y ar !anistlyin:cint or !anistly -3ysically inca-acitat or ar ot3r6is r!ov orcaus.

    T3 &rant o suc3 5tnsion !ay b !a in accoranc 6it3 5istin& ruls an

    r&ulations o t3 UST. ,t a--ars t3at on Marc3 )()$##( t3 Rctor o t3 UST laio6n t3 -rocur or t3 5tnsion o srvic o rtir aculty !!brs asollo6s

    G). ; !ust a--ly in 6ritin& to t3 Dan o 3is Coll& o A:liation2

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    6/11

    J. ;is a--lication is sub

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    7/11

    vot o 63ic3 is r8uir or a rco!!nation o t3 5tnsion o t3 a--licant tot3 Council o R&nts an Aca!ic Snat. T3 Council o R&nts an Aca!icSnat 6ill t3n !t s-aratly an !a= t3 cision sub3n t3 cision is or a nial o t3 5tnsion o tnur o a rtir t3 cisions3oul b !a in consultation 6it3 t3 Union. ;o6vr( suc3 consultation is notncssary 63n t3 rtir is valily s-arat ro! t3 srvic.

    ,n t3 cas o Pro. Mari@o( s3 6as( as aorstat( allo6 an 5tnsion o t6o Jyars in 3r tac3in& stint in t3 Faculty o P3ar!acy or t3 sc3oolyars )$#'I)$##. ;o6vr( s3 6as ni 5tnsion o tnur or t3 sc3oolyar )$##I)$#$.Contrary to t3 clai! o -titionr t3at t3r 6as no consultation 6it3 t3 Union( ita--ars t3at on un J0( )$##( t3 Union 6rot t3 Rctor o UST on t3 !attr o

    5tnsion o t3 srvic o Pro. Mari@o. ,n a lttr o un J( )$##( t3 Union 6asinor! by t3 Rctor o t3 rasons 63y t3 5tnsion 6as ni( as ollo6s

    G). No rco!!nation on Mrs. Mari@os 5tnsion or anot3r yar 6as !a byt3 Dan an Faculty Council o t3 Faculty o P3ar!acy( 63ic3 rco!!nation isconition sin 8ua non or t3 yarly &rant o 5tnsion.

    J. T3 t6o J sub

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    8/11

    UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Rlations Co!!ision

    K. ,t is t3 -osition o Mana&!nt t3at t3 !attr o 5tnsion o t3 tr! osrvic o -rossors byon t3 co!-ulsory rtir!nt a& o si5ty 9v '% yarsis not a !attr o ri&3t( l&ally norcabl an !anabl( but a !r -rivl&63ic3 t3 Univrsity !ay 6it33ol in t3 ri&3tul 5rcis o its iscrtionary -o6ran -rro&ativ. To !a= it a l&ally norcabl an !anabl ri&3t 6oulcrtainly at t3 vry -ur-os an rason b3in t3 co!-ulsary rtir!ntsc3! an 6oul -rvnt t3 inusion o youn& bloo in t3 aca!ic co!!unityo t3 Univrsity

    4. >3il it is tru t3at t3 Collctiv ar&ainin& A&r!nt CA -rovis orconsultation 6it3 t3 union in cass o nial o 5tnsion( 3o6vr( in t3is-articular cas o Mrs. Mari@o( it is t3 -osition o Mana&!nt t3at no urt3r

    consultation is ncssary sinc 3r cas 3as bn t3 sub

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    9/11

    4 Ann5 to t3 Co!!nt2 -a&s )K$I)40( Rollo.

    40'

    40'

    SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED

    UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Rlations Co!!ission

    coul 3av bn &rant2 an J t3 sub3n t3 co!-ulsory rtir!nt a& is rac3 by an !-loy or o:cial 3 ist3rby ctivly s-arat ro! t3 srvic. ;o6vr( t3 !-loyr 6oul b t3bst

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    10/11

    ,n t3 cas o t3 t3r K -rossors o t3 Faculty o Civil La6( na!ly Mssrs.os Fria( Antonio "r&orio cas an /oltair "arcia( asi ro! t3 act t3atnon o t3! a--li or t3 5tnsion o tnur( all o t3! 3av rac3 t3 a&o 0 byon 63ic3 no 5tnsion !ay b &rant unr t3 ruls o t3 sc3ool.

    T3 -ublic rs-onnt i not co!!it a &rav abus o iscrtion in is!issin& t3co!-laint o -titionr. ,n t3 sa! li&3t( t3 UST i not co!!it an unair labor-ractic in nyin& t3 5tnsion o t3 srvic o Pro. Mari@o vn 6it3outconsultation 6it3 -titionr.

    >;EREFORE( t3 -tition is D,SM,SSED( 6it3out -roI

    ???????????????

    % Ann5s r to EI)( Co!!nt o t3 Privat Rs-onnt.

    40

    /OL. )##( AU"UST ( )$$0

    40

    Po-l vs. D "u!an

    nounc!nt as to costs.

    SO ORDERED.

    Cru( "ri@oIA8uino an Miala( .( concur.

    Narvasa .( C3air!an( No -art.

  • 7/24/2019 UST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Relations Commission, 188 SCRA 400(1990

    11/11

    Ptition is!iss.

    Not.7T3 acc-tanc o s-aration -ay os not bar t3 6or=rs ro! 8ustionin&t3 valiity o t3ir is!issal. n& Sn& vs. D la Cru( )'% SCRA J$.

    77o0o77 QUST Faculty Union vs. National Labor Rlations Co!!ission( )## SCRA400)$$0