“using trade agreements to obtain market access for legal and other services” world services...
TRANSCRIPT
“Using Trade Agreements to
ObtainMarket Access for Legal and Other
Services”World Services Group Annual Meeting
September 17, 2004
By Robert VastinePresident, U.S. Coalition of Services
Industrieswww.uscsi.org
Coalition of Service Industries Association of US private companies Advocates services trade expansion
By removing market barriers complex and diverse substantially regulatory
Works mainly with governments to achieve goals Leverages relationships with business in other
countries Financial Leaders Group Global Services Network Friends of Services
ABC’s of Services Trade
Four elements Cross-border trade
trade conducted electronically Consumption abroad
Tourism, health care, education Trade through US foreign affiliates
Commercial presence Movement of natural persons
Temporary entry is not immigration
These are the four “Modes of Supply” of the GATS
US is Highly Competitive in Services Trade
Cross-border services trade was almost $50 billion in surplus in 2003 Services exports were $307 billion in 2003
Affiliates sales of services were $432 billion (in 2001) affiliate sales have special significance for services
Global services trade totals $1.8 trillion Only 20% of overall trade of $9 trillion
Because the effort to remove barriers began in 1994 Barriers are substantially regulatory
As in legal and financial services
Removing Barriers to US Services Trade
US brought services into global trade system GATS 1994
Framework of rules for liberal trade in services Major element of the WTO Few commitments
Much work to liberalize services trade remains
This work is now focused on the “Doha Round” of negotiations under WTO and in FTAs based on same principles
Using Trade Negotiations toBreak Down Barriers
Multilaterally – the “Doha Round” Negotiations
Bilateral Free Trade Agreements Singapore, Chile, and Morocco have been
implemented Australia, Bahrain, CAFTA, and Dominican Republic
have been completed, but not implemented Andean countries, Panama, Southern African
Customs Union (SACU) and Thailand are being negotiated
Regional efforts like Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) and Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA)
Legal Services Trade “Trade” in legal services occurs in all the
four “modes” ” mentioned above “Trade” occurs when a foreign client
consults a San Francisco law firm or when a US lawyer provides advice to clients in
Bangkok from his branch office or his hotel room US cross-border exports of legal services
were $3.3 billion in 2002 Imports were $768 million, surplus $2.5 billion Trade through affiliates was $918 million in 2001 Removing restrictions will permit more growth
What CSI Wants for Legal Services
Foreign lawyers and law firms should be able to establish and practice in any business form available to host country firms Foreign firms should be able to use the
name used in their home country Foreign lawyers and law firms should be able
to perform services in a host country that they are allowed to perform in their home country Except litigation in local courts and other
services unique to home country law (e.g., probate)
What US Wants for Legal Services (continued)
Foreign firms should be able to supply legal services relating to the host country law IF those services are provided by a qualified local lawyer affiliated with, or retained by a foreign firm Foreign lawyers who want to qualify as a host country legal professional
should have a reasonable opportunity to do so Foreign firms should be able to choose forms of association with local
lawyers Foreign lawyers should be able to use their home country
professional titles Or any title authorized for use by a host country lawyer, if qualified (e.g.,
Queen’s Counsellor) Foreign lawyers should be able to participate in arbitration CSI has submitted a negotiating proposal to USTR
USTR has provided all WTO members available at www.uscsi.org
Transparency Is a Top Priority for All Sectors
Regulatory and licensing transparency An overriding US objective in the WTO and FTAs
Authorities should make administrative regulations publicly available Prior comment is essential
Transparent, impartial registration procedures Regulators should process applications within a
reasonable period Written statement of reasons if registration is
denied Reasonable opportunity to appeal and re-apply
Liberalization in Other Sectors
Doha Round covers all services except air transportation And maritime
Financial services are an important focus Also telecommunications, express delivery,
energy services
US has ambitious agenda To secure meaningful liberalization across all
sectors
Financial Services Liberalization
CSI has led the private sector effort to secure liberalization Supported Treasury and USTR in 1997
negotiations, and in current Doha Round Developed the Financial Leaders Group
Lobby foreign governments to liberalize Develop detailed lists of barriers in important
‘developing’ countries [India, Brazil, Korea, Egypt, ASEAN]
Ask US, EU, Japanese and Canadian government negotiators to secure removal of these barriers
Examples of Financial Examples of Financial Services Services Barriers We Seek We Seek
to Removeto Remove Example: Brazil 170 million people, biggest Latin American market Tradition of state ownership and heavy regulation Substantial protectionism
Banking [commercial presence] Case-by-case authorization (with conditions) by
Presidential decree Restricted to acquisition of domestic bank, or
establishment of a subsidiary branch or rep office Foreign subs can’t provide “universal” banking service Discretionary limits on number of branches (including
ATMs) No accounts in foreign currencies Restrictions on foreign bank rep office personnel
Need YOUR help to Motivate Trade Liberalization Efforts
Support the US government effort in WTO And FTAs
Lobby other governments Services trade liberalization will
massively benefit the US University of Michigan computational analysis
shows elimination of barriers would have $466 billion welfare effect on US alone
$1662 billion effect on global welfare