using english as a medium of instruction: challenges and
TRANSCRIPT
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
43 | P a g e
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges
and Opportunities of Multilingual Classrooms in Nepal
Pitambar Paudel
Department of English Education, Prithvi Narayan Campus, Pokhara
ABSTRACT
English as a medium of instruction has great
influence in school education in Nepal. It is taken
as a pluralistic language which promotes
harmony and tolerance, and increases career,
opportunities, hope and progress. At the same
time, there is a danger of survival for local
languages due to the imperialistic role of
English. In such a context, this paper has tried to
explore the results created due to the extensive
use of English as a medium of instruction. To
address this objective, the study employs a
phenomenological research design under the
qualitative approach. The information was
collected from eight teachers and eight parents
of eight different community schools through
interviews and purposively selected two focus
group discussions. The collected information
from both the tools and sources were coded,
triangulated, analyzed, interpreted and presented
into three different themes. The results show the
use of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI)
in school education as a debatable issue due to
the fear of loss of local languages despite its
advantages. This implies that the government
should make an appropriate language policy and
education system to maintain a harmonious and
mutual relationship between English and other
languages in school education so that children can get opportunities in English
language, and become aware of their languages.
KEYWORDS: Curricula, English language, English language teaching, mother tongue
education, multilingual classroom
INTRODUCTION
Language is a means of social interaction, and interaction is a means by which
social relations are constructed and maintained. The development of new technology has
Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation [A Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Multidisciplinary Bilingual Journal; Indexed in NepJOL]
ISSN 2705-4888 [Print]; ISSN 2705-4896 [Online]
Special Issue “Research & Practice”, 15 June 2021, pp. 43-56
eJournal Site: http://ejournals.pncampus.edu.np/ejournals/pjri/
Article History:
Submitted 27 April 2021
Reviewed 18 May 2021
Accepted 01 June 2021
Corresponding Author:
Pitambar Paudel
Email: [email protected]
Article DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/pjri.v3i1.37434
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2021 © Author/s and Centre
for Research and Innovation.
This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial
4.0 International License.
Publisher:
Centre for Research and Innovation
Prithvi Narayan Campus
Tribhuvan University
Pokhara, Nepal
[Accredited by UGC, Nepal]
Tel.: +977-61-576837
Email: [email protected]
URL: www.pncampus.edu.np
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
44 | P a g e
enabled people to maintain relationships with the people of far distance, who have
diverse national, linguistic and cultural backgrounds. New technology has made the
world a global village. In order to have successful communication among the people with
diverse nationalities, linguistic and cultural backgrounds, they need to learn a common
language. In this context, Ke (2015) argues that a common world language is to be
aspired for human beings to prevent miscommunication among people who otherwise
speak different languages. Global language is expected for comprehensive
communication and prevents possible miscommunication. In this connection, Friedline
(2019) states that English language provides a system in which people of diverse
linguistic backgrounds can coexist peacefully in a harmonious environment with more or
less equal opportunities to share their power in their own languages. English language
provides rights, justice, equality and freedom to the entire languages that exist in the
society and using it as a medium of instruction provides a comprehensive exposure of
knowledge and communication.
English is also used widely in the world for different purposes such as in product
promotions, television programs, newspapers, education, law, and so on. In this context,
Modiano (2001) states that English language cannot be avoided and he claims, “English
is now a prerequisite for participation in a vast number of activities. The global village is
being constructed in the English language, as are the information highways” (p. 341).
English language has become a means of global communication. Similarly, Pennycook
(2010) calls English language as a gatekeeper that gives access to different advancements
achieved by different sectors: business, education, science and technology to the people
of different linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Though English is learnt with norms of
native culture along with English language, still countries like India, Africa, Malaysia,
etc. have come up with their own English norms through their own varieties such as
Indian English, West African English, or Malaysian English. This shows that English has
become Englishes. However, Honey (1997) supports that only standard form of English
is prestigious and people should learn and follow only standard form of English to enter
the world academia. Crystal (2003) affirms, “English fosters cultural opportunity and
promotes a climate of international intelligibility” (p. 32). English as the lingua franca of
the world has been used in several shares of education in different forms and
perspectives. English is described as a destructive, pluralistic and imperialistic language
(Gradol, 2002; Gil, 2005). The extensive spread of English language and excessive use of
it have brought crucial issues in the multilingual contexts.
English as a language of hope, progress and knowledge, lingua franca cannot be
ignored. The use of English for global communication and its extensive use in education
have given major priority to use English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) in developing
countries including Nepal. EMI is a model of teaching in which non-English subjects are
taught through the medium of English. The use of EMI is linked to the demand of
English for economic progress and global communication (Phillipson, 2017; Sah & Li,
2018). With the increasing demand of English from both parents and students, EMI has
become a well adopted and preferred phenomenon in public schools of Nepal. However,
EMI has become a debatable issue due to the lack of adequate education policy of the
government. In this context, Sah (2015) states that EMI has been receiving great attention
from the language policy researchers due to the lack of government to sustain a single
educational policy with effects. Khati (2016) finds that public schools in Nepal are
shifting the medium of instruction to English to attract a large number of students and
EMI has been implemented without any logical guidelines. The policy, curricula and the
teachers’ efficiency are always in question for effective implementation of EMI. In this
context, Macaro (2017) concedes that qualified academics, effective course books or all
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
45 | P a g e
the other requirements are of great importance when scrutinizing EMI in education.
Without considering these facts, EMI has been announced to be mandatory in public
schools on one hand and on the other hand, the government has encouraged mother
tongue education in its policy. EMI has not been investigated, assessed and analyzed
properly. In this context, researching teachers’ and parents’ perspectives on whether EMI
is an opportunity or challenge in the multilingual classes of Nepal is a significant.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
English as a global language plays a crucial role in accessibility to education.
Access to educational opportunities, career development, and a huge resource of
knowledge and technology are the prime factors that have enriched the practices and
uses, and motivation of the teachers, parents and learners to English language in school
education despite their fear of the possible loss of their local languages. In this
circumstance, most of the nations have developed bilingual and multilingual education
systems that recognize the child’s native language as a second language, which may be
the official language of the nation. In this context, Teevno (2011) claims that the syllabus
is not as per the needs of the learners and English teachers are not given any proper
training, which makes the English teachers difficult to teach in multilingual classroom
contexts. Moreover, Noom-Ura's (2013) study suggests the proper trainings, seminars,
workshops and study trip for both teachers and students for their academic and
professional career in linguistically diverse situations. Likewise, Ismaili (2015) realizes
the need of using the first language (L1) in teaching English rather than imposing only
English as a medium of instruction. Similarly, Gopang et al.’s (2015) research also
reveals that students feel comfortable in speaking in their native language and feel
hesitant to speak in English due to fear of committing mistakes. In the same issue,
Cholakeva’s (2015) study exhibits that, in monolingual environment, the speakers
generally use English as an obligatory subject in the classrooms. They used English
outside the classroom but in the context of multilingual setting, they used English both
inside and outside the classroom to avoid the possible conflicting situation. This usually
occurs to the people who have different linguistic and cultural backgrounds.
Language used in education is crucial for learners’ academic success. In this
context, Ewie and Eshun (2015) insist that nations where native languages are not the
languages of education have promulgated the language policies to solve communication
problems in their school education system. Further, Albakri’s (2017) study shows that
majority of the participants accepted EMI, but they faced great problems in their study
due to their insufficient language competence. Similarly, Chan et al. (2020) state that
instructions applied in the EMI classes were more topic-centred than the problem-
centred, focusing on activating a new learning and knowledge presentation through
demonstration.
In the Nepali education system, English has been used from basic level to
advanced level either as a core subject or an optional subject. All the studies on Nepali
languages with great concern of international societies are written and expressed only in
English. Nepal is a multilingual country where CBI (2011) records 123 languages spoken
as mother tongues; however, Awasthi (2020) mentions that this number has reached 129.
The constitution of Nepal (2015) has made the provision that all the languages spoken in
the country are national languages and Nepali is the official language. However, a federal
state can decide its own official language. Education Manual (2015) states that English or
Nepali or both can be used as a medium of instruction; however, primary education can
be given in the mother tongue. Though Nepal has adopted the bilingual or multilingual
language policy, Ethnologue (2016) records that 32 languages are in a vigorous state, 54
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
46 | P a g e
languages are in trouble and eight are dying out. Wanta (2017) concedes that Nepali
education providing institutions have not made any mechanism to preserve these
languages; instead, they are promoting and spreading writing only in English. The
government aided schools have started shifting their medium of instruction to English
where private institutions have made only English environment. Sah (2018) mentions that
there are very limited success stories of EMI and the ad hoc implementation of it without
any adequate policy may be counterproductive. Similarly, Paudel (2017) from his
research concludes that EMI implementation is difficult in the context of Nepal due to
poor English competence of the teachers and lack of suitable training to handle it in the
multilingual situation. If the trend of using English goes at the same speed, there is high
possibility of developing English as a variety of English in Nepal as it was developed in
the form of Indian English, Malaysian English, etc. This shows that the implication of
English as medium of instruction has mounted local languages in danger situations. The
people who are advocating mother tongue education are worrying about the possible
death of their local languages and loss of cultural identity due to Englishes or use of
English as a medium of instruction.
The diverse and complex situations created due to spread of English in
multilingual classes of Nepal enticed me in exploring the challenges and opportunities of
English as a medium of instruction in multilingual classes of Nepal.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The theoretical stands behind this study are pluralism and linguistic imperialism.
They are discussed in details below.
Pluralism
Pluralistic is an approach which addresses all the issues in diversity being far
from the notion of domination or imperialism. Pluralism is social diversity, which can be
rendered as linguistic, political, religious, cultural and philosophical stance. In linguistic
pluralism, all the language users whatever the number of speakers, can enjoy their pride
and privilege in their language without any feeling of being superiors or inferiors. For
Spickard (2017), linguistic pluralism is not only diversity but it is an energetic
engagement with such diversity in the society for equality, tolerance, peace and harmony
in using and practicing languages in the society.
English as a pluralistic language is not the language of only inner circle countries
where it is acquired as a native language. Kachru's (1985) report shows that a number of
native speakers in comparison to non-native speakers of English have been decreasing
and the countries are shifting from one circle to another. English either in the native
language form or non-native language form has created opportunities for all the speakers
and the people of different cultural backgrounds. In this vein, Gil (2005) mentions that
the spread of English as a global language has led to a number of local varieties as Indian
English, African English, etc. Such varieties are called non-native varieties and they
express the identity, culture and peculiars of their speakers. Addressing this issue, Yano
(2001) argues that the line between native and non-native speakers is beginning to blur
(as cited in Gil, 2005, p. 73). In many countries which were under outer circle in Kachru's
(1985) classification, people have begun to consider themselves to be functional, not
genetic native speakers of English. In this context, Legrain (2002) writes that countries
traditionally designated as part of the inner circle or English as native language territories
have a large number of immigrants living within their borders and claim that if this
trend goes on, by the year 2050 one third of Americans will have Asian or Hispanic roots
(as cited in Gil, 2005, p. 27). The widespread of English as a second language or a
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
47 | P a g e
foreign language has made English as a native language questionable. The prime focus in
communicative competence rather than linguistic competence at present day world has
made English as a second language or foreign language more popular and prestigious
than English as a native language.
English language as a medium of instruction has made the students enjoy the
dignity, prestige and opportunities in the world. As a pluralistic language, it has created
homogeneity in terms of geographical location and English has become more diverse in
its forms, functions and cultural associations.
Linguistic Imperialism Linguistic imperialism refers to the transfer of a dominant language to the
speakers of other languages. Phillipson (2007) writes that linguistic imperialism describes
the export of English language teaching too many post-colonial countries and that
currently English plays the role of imperialist language. Phillipson (2007) uses “neo-
colonialism” (p. 42) to refer to the role of English language in many foreign countries.
Dominance of English is asserted and maintained by the establishment and continuous
reconstruction of structural and cultural inequalities between English and other
languages.
Though English is serving as an international language but it does not follow the
characteristics of a denationalized language. In this background, Pennycook (2001) states
that English is not investigated critically because English lacks a social, historical,
cultural and political relationship as an international language. In the same issue, Mckay
(2002) argues that an international language should be “de-nationalized”, the cultural
norms of native speakers should not be imposed on the learners; and the goal of learning
an international language should only be enabling learners to interact with people from
different cultures (p. 12). But English as an international language compels the learners
interact only in it, but not in their own languages. In this connection, Graddol (2006)
insists that the future of English is going to be determined by all users around the world,
not only by its native speakers as English has become an international lingua franca.
English and English language teaching have certainly served both American and British
interests. The global spread of the English language can be seen as linked to linguistic
imperialism, in particular, where English becomes dominant at the expense of indigenous
languages. The use of English as a medium of instruction may marginalize other
languages due to people’s attraction on English as the language of gatekeeper to
education, employment, business opportunities and popular culture.
METHODOLOGY
Based on the constructivism as a philosophical stand point, and pluralism and
imperialism as theoretical bases, this study has adopted the following methodology.
Study Design
For this study, I have used a phenomenological research design under qualitative
inquiry. Finlay (2009) states that phenomenology is the study of phenomena, their nature
and meanings (as cited in Kafle, 2011, p. 181). Similarly, Van (1990) concedes that
phenomenological research seeks understanding of the meaning and significance of a
particular phenomenon as it is lived (as cited in Diaz, 2015). Similarly, Willis (2007)
asserts that phenomenology allows the researcher to focus on subjective and multiple
realities (as cited in Campbell, 2015, p. 288). It provides a rich textured description of
lived experience and reality. In this study, I have taken English as a medium of
instruction in multilingual classes of the school education as a phenomenon in which I
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
48 | P a g e
delved the teachers’ and parents’ experiences and attitudes towards the use of English as
a medium of instruction in multilingual classes of school education.
Sources of Data I employed both primary and secondary sources of data. The primary sources of
the research were the basic level English subject teaching teachers and the parents of the
students of the same level of community schools and the secondary sources of data were
the basic level curricula, previously carried out research, books, journal articles and
electronic versions related to the issue.
Sample Design
The population of the study was the entire English subject teaching teachers at
basic level and the parents of the students studying at the same level of community
schools. But it was impossible to involve the total population in the study due to the
nature of study as it is a phenomenological qualitative method. So, I selected 10 basic
community schools (eight for interview and two for focus group discussion) using the
purposive non-random sampling. From the selected schools, eight English teachers (one
from each school) and eight parents from the same schools were selected purposively for
the unstructured interview and two schools and basic level English subject teaching
teachers and the parents of these schools were purposively selected for focus group
discussion in which two teachers and two parents were involved in each focus group
discussion
Tools and Techniques of Data Collection
Since this is a phenomenological research, the unstructured interview and focus
group discussion were the major tools for data collection.
Data Analysis Procedures
The data collected through interviews and focus group discussions were coded
first, and they were analyzed individually. Then, the separately analyzed data were
triangulated, classified, and categorized in to various themes. After that, I entered them
into phenomenological reduction by delineating the data into three specified themes. The
results were interpreted along with the discussion and analysis.
RESULTS
English as a global language is taken as widely used and most powerful means of
communication between or among the people of diverse linguistic backgrounds. Along
with its global importance, the trend of using English as a Medium of Instruction has
been growing in the global phenomenon of present day world academia. In the education
system of Nepal, Nepali was taken as a medium of instruction a few years ago though
English was used in private schools. The medium of instruction has remained as a
debatable issue among the academics both in and across the country. However, with the
advent of democracy in 1990, the government of Nepal has made the provision of mother
tongue education (MTE) in consonance with the UN declaration made in 1951. As a
result of which the national commission for language policy (1992) has recommended
mother tongue as a medium of instruction at primary level education (Singh et al., 2012).
On the on hand, mother tongue education is in acceleration and, on the other hand,
English language has been used and enforced in classroom teaching. The education
manual (2015) suggesting English or Nepali or both as medium of instruction widened
the debate more, that is, MTE is being promoted by the government plans and policies
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
49 | P a g e
while the motivation towards English language is too high since it is taken as the
language of identity and dignity. In this motive, public schools in Nepal have been
directed their efforts towards English as a medium of instruction. All the teachers and a
few parents were known to the concept of EMI. When the researcher described the
parents about the concept of EMI, they put their views and arguments as if they were
familiar to the concept.
Though both parents and teachers were positive and hopeful towards the role and
position of English as a global education in Nepal, they have presented their mixed
opinions regarding the use of English as a medium of instruction. Considering their
viewpoints, both in interviews and focus group discussions on the questions raised on
EMI, the data can be analyzed and interpreted into three different sub-themes: EMI is
suitable and obligatory for classroom instruction; EMI is irrelevant for classroom
instruction; and it is difficult and challenging to implement in multilingual classes of
Nepal.
Need and Suitability of English as EMI During interviews and focus group discussions, a few teachers and parents
realized the need and appropriateness of English using as a medium of instruction in
public schools at basic level education. They believed that it was better to shift the
medium of instruction from Nepali to English in our environment because English
language competency makes our children able to cope with the challenges of world
communication. One of the teacher informants (T1) expressed:
Our country is linguistically very complex where 129 languages are spoken. One
language community does not understand the language of another community
even they do not understand our national language, Nepali. In this complicated
situation, shifting medium of instruction from Nepali to English is the demand of
the parents from grassroots level rather than imposition from any policy of the
government.
In the remark, EMI was parents' demand rather than the government policy. P6 agreed
and affirmed that those children who had been enrolled in private schools and instructed
in English had better results and performance in each field of opportunities than the
children who had studied in public schools and instructed in the Nepali language. Thus,
they requested the school management committee and school administration to teach
their children in the English language.
The data reveal that majority of the teachers put emphasis on the use of EMI than
other medium of instructions. They are aware of the significance and implication of
English using English as a medium of instruction in teaching various subjects that
incorporate different themes and domains. For instance, T6 affirmed:
I think, in the beginning of implementing EMI, teachers were just for giving
content either by rotting or taking note but slowly and slowly, they are now able
to speak English taking ideas from themselves and from students. In this sense,
EMI promotes teachers' confidence and prefers learners' voices more than
imposing anything to them.
Teaching has been shifted from the teacher to the learner with inception of EMI as T7
stated, "EMI builds up students' strength in English and it becomes easy and enjoyable
for them." EMI, in the words of teachers, provides comprehensibility and regards
students' voice while shaping the classroom activities.
Most of the parents were very happy and thankful towards school administrations
who had implemented EMI and provided an exposure of language and the content to their
children in the same way as the private schools did. However, they were still skeptic on
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
50 | P a g e
the ability of public schools' teachers who in the words of parents are not well trained and
habituated to teach all subjects in the English medium. Sharing the experience of their
children’s success after implementation of EMI in schools, one of the parents (P2)
conceded:
My daughter was very worried when I was unable to attend her in a private
school considering the content and command in English of her friend in my next
door. But with the use of English as a medium of instruction and implementing
the textbooks that private schools have been using at her own school, she has
become happy, more energetic, curious and conscious in her study.
Another parent also agreed with this experience as he had also the similar experience
with his son who was in grade five and added that his son totally lost his shyness in
speaking English and his result has been improved. Agreeing with these parents during
focus group discussion, the teachers expressed their happiness, considering their students'
enthusiasm of borrowing books from the library and asking several questions and
curiosities in learning English. They said that students at basic level education have felt
very happy as being equal to the students of boarding schools. The information given by
the parents shows that English as a medium of instruction motivates their children to be
the world citizens, improving their local proficiency in the foreign language.
Both parents and teachers' perceptions towards EMI are optimistic to see the
good position of their children and students since they have found changes in their
students’ behavior and teachers' performance. They take English as a language of
pedagogical usefulness, academic excellence and global standard.
EMI is Irrelevant in Multilingual Classes
Some teachers and parents stood against EMI in basic level multilingual classes
of Nepal. They argued that the use of English as medium of instruction is a form of
colonizing students, their languages and cultures on the one hand; it does not provide any
solid foundation for better understanding of the students on the other. They also added
that EMI is difficult for teachers, too. One of the teacher participants (T3) expressed his
experience as:
The school administration and management committee decided and asked us to
teach all the subjects (except Nepali) into English, which was very difficult for us
because we had to learn English before we went to the classroom as we were
habituated teaching in the grammar translation method. The students’ happiness
in English was only due to their feeling of equality between private schools'
students and themselves, but it was difficult to learn and comprehend. Teaching
in English to English has created great difficulty to the teachers due to lack of
vocabulary, grammar and teaching habit.
Teachers' demotivation, lack of confidence and imposed administrative policy do not
bring better results in the performance of students. In this vein, T4 added "I don't think
EMI brings good results in multilingual classes like us where there are students from
diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds." In this statement, T4 argued that students
enjoy and understand more when they are learning in their own tongues or in Nepali
language even if they feel equal when learning in English. They are forcefully pushed
towards the English language, which may not give the result as they expected by a few
parents who were also worried about English language in teaching social studies and
moral education. They expressed that their children are neither good in English nor they
know their own language. Teachers also agreed with the parents and asked the school to
let them teach some subjects in their own languages, if not, at least in the Nepali
language. One of the parents (P1) stated, "His son was better in performance and well-
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
51 | P a g e
disciplined when the subjects were taught in Nepali, but now they are showing their rude
manner due to English influence on them." They thought that knowledge in English
makes them superior.
Mother tongue education is the key of students’ morality and discipline. But P4
does not think that EMI is better than other mediums of instructions. He claims that the
use of only English is making our children forget our Gurung language and our culture.
In the same manner, P3 added that only English should not be permitted; instead, English
as a vocational subject can be taught in English. Subjects like social and moral studies
should be taught in Nepali and both teachers and parents accepted that EMI causes
greater difficulties in comprehending the course content and inhibited them from
expressing fluently in the classroom. Both the parents and teachers are susceptive in the
implementation of policy of the government. Their opinions reveal that without preparing
teachers and parents for implementing EMI without any policy level research, the
decision of implementing EMI has become destructive and irrelevant in the context of
Nepal. The teachers and parents are worried about their local languages and cultures, and
students' behaviours and achievements created due to EMI. They agreed that EMI
introduced the overloaded content and foster rote learning both in teachers and learners.
All those who were against EMI demanded such medium that can address the
multilingual and multicultural nature of our classes. The teachers preferred to use
intercultural and multilingual approaches so that our languages would not be destructed
and students would not be prevented from getting global knowledge. Their opinions
about IMI imply that English should be used but it should not be imposed as a medium of
instruction. It can be used for a particular level/class where its full marks can be increased
rather imposed as EMI.
Challenges of EMI in Multilingualism
As a multilingual country, Nepal government is responsible to preserve, protect,
respect and promote all national languages. At the same time, it is obliged to have global
communication and access to rapid advancement of technologies, which is possible only
through the knowledge and exposure of English language. Realizing this fact, public
schools of Nepal have shifted their medium of instruction into English, which has given
rise to a number of challenges for its implementation and use at basic level of school
education. During the interviews and focus group discussions, both teachers and parents
were worried about the possible loss of their mother tongues if they accept English as in
the same rate and ratio of present day time. One of the teacher informants (T5) found
students’ levels, backgrounds and economic conditions are the major challenges in
implementing EMI. In the same context, another teacher (T7) agreed with T5, stating,
"There is weak exposure of English language to all the students which imbeds the
effective and efficient implementation of EMI at our basic school levels." Another
teacher T3 added, "Our students are from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds and
English language cannot provide equal justice to all the languages." All the parents asked
the policy makers, school administrators and the teachers to provide English language
teaching training so that they could be able to teach with determination and confidence.
In this vein, P1 expressed, "EMI is difficult due to our teachers' poor knowledge in
English language." Agreeing with P1, P6 blamed the teachers that they were not
motivated from core of heart to use EMI because they did not know English language.
All the teachers during the focus group discussion accepted some of the ideas
expressed by parents as true in the sense that EMI at their schools was forcefully
implemented without giving them any training and exposure of English language.
However, they recognized that the class size, parents’ awareness and care towards
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
52 | P a g e
children's study, behavior and performance, economic condition of both schools and
parents, and students' desire towards learning English were the major challenges that they
encountered with. In this regards, the teacher participant (T3) expressed:
EMI has been introduced in my school since last year to catch the whim of the
society and its pressure. So far I know, EMI prefers group activities,
collaboration and cooperation and monolingual situation. But the classes in my
schools are very small with poor desks and benches where we are compelled to
keep sixty students and the students even do not understand Nepali. In this
situation, a teacher cannot do what he/she wants.
Students’ mother tongues and classroom environment should be conducive for both
teachers and students in the classroom. Parents realized that their pressure on EMI was
untimely without considering teachers, their level and schools' infrastructures. They
strongly demanded teacher training and furniture management in the schools. They also
showed their readiness to support in this fact. Teachers have found to be facing pressure
from parents, administration and the interference of students’ mother tongue during the
classes were more challenging. They also conceded that they were deprived of
encouragement and support from the stakeholders on the one hand, and the less motivated
environment, poor resources and facilities in schools on the other.
DISCUSSION
The practices of using English as a medium of instruction in basic level
education of Nepal have become a matter of discussion among the stakeholders. The
teachers’ and parents’ responses reveal both positive and negative aspects of using
English as a medium of instruction in the multilingual classrooms. Some of them take
English as a medium of instruction is better and suitable in Nepal for facing the
challenges of world communication. It is the language to know world politics, business,
education and, science and technology. Their claim reflects what Ressool (2013) argues
about English that it is the key to social, political and economic prosperity. English is the
language of harmony and relation being accessible to all, which made English as a
medium of instruction in the Nepali education system based on demand rather than
imposed by any policy, observing it as 'interconnectedness and means of inclusion'
(Pennycook, 2010). English as a medium of instruction increases teachers' confidence,
and brings methodological changes in their teaching, increasing students' strength and
comprehensibility as English is the language storing a huge resource of knowledge and
innovating new methods and techniques. It provides the students of public schools a
sense of equality, motivation and encouragement equipping with a huge exposure of
language and resources for good performance. These accounts expressed by teachers and
parents on EMI match with Hung's (2015) claim that EMI in the multilingual classroom
promotes teaching and learning motivation and ease the learning pressure. English as a
medium of instruction as parents and teachers perceive improve both teachers’ and
learners’ career prospects and facilitates them to pursue higher education as Ibrahim
(2001) calls EMI for cognitive advantages both for teachers and students, exposing them
with a huge resource in English language and chances to achieve.
The data collected from both teachers and parents through interviews and focus
group discussions also show a few informants’ position against EMI. They believe that
forceful implementation of EMI without plan and preparation, and teachers' motivation
will be more descriptive. Their views implied that the use of EMI is decreasing the
learners’ actual understanding of the content. The teachers have to rote all the content and
recite it in the classroom, which cannot improve either the teacher’s competency or
students’ comprehensibility. These accounts of teachers and parents affirm Macaros
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
53 | P a g e
(2017) and Macaro and Akincioglu's (2018) argument who claim that EMI increases
unnecessary cognitive load and encourages rote learning due to the poor proficiency of
practitioners in the language. Their responses also reflect that EMI has raised a question
in students' manner, discipline and behavior on the one side and in position of local
tongues and culture on the other hand. It has created "Linguistic, pedagogical and
psychological barriers" (Baer, 2008, p. 3; as cited in Author, 2017) for getting access of
education in their own language. The teachers' and parents' responses recognize the
possible loosing condition of mother tongues, classroom size, students linguistic and
cultural background, lack of adequate exposure of English language, insufficient support
and encouragement, lack of training for professional growth and development and the
challenges of using EMI in multilingual classes of school education in Nepal. The
parents' questions on teachers' skill, knowledge and proficiency in English indicate that
teachers are to be trained, given an exposure to English, and encouragement and support
from the school administration.
The use of EMI in multilingual classes in the basic level of school education is a
matter of serious thought. The Nepal Government, policymakers, curriculum designers,
teachers and parents are in need of being conscious and determined to analyze the
context, need, level of knowledge and linguistic landscape of the country before making
policies and implementing them in practice as the data revealed its beneficiaries and
irrelevancies.
CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS
This study intended to investigate the usefulness of English as a medium of
instruction in multilingual classes of Nepal from teachers’ and parents’ perspectives as a
phenomenological inquiry. The results show that it is a debatable issue among the
academics of the Nepali education system as both parents and teachers put their views in
favour and against it. Those who support it believe that EMI is the demand of the world
to take our teachers and learners in the global market since EMI enhances exposure to a
huge resource of knowledge, by which teachers and learners can be updated and exposed
with methodological shift, updated knowledge, science and technology and world
interconnectedness. Those who opposed it claim that comprehension can be better in the
mother tongue than in English since our students do not have an exposure of English
language at home. Their views reflect difficulty in its implementation because the
administrators forced the teachers to teach in English without any plans, policies,
preparations and teachers' motivation. EMI adds an unnecessary load on teachers and
promotes rote learning rather than understanding and bringing change in the students’
behaviour. This dispute needs to be addressed by framing appropriate policies, curricula
and textbooks to be implemented at school level. The teachers are unable to deal with
multilingual contexts due to lack of proper training, workshops and knowledge in the
current and updated methodologies which requires appropriate refresher and updated
courses for them so that they can maintain a linguistic and cultural harmony.
Despite the fact that this study contributes to an understanding of teachers’ and
parents’ perspectives towards EMI in multilingual classes in school education of Nepal, it
has a number of delimitations. First, it was a small scale phenomenological research
design incorporating only teachers’ and parents’ perspectives; therefore, its findings may
have limited applicability. A large scale survey research or convergent parallel design
incorporating multiple layers of participants like policymakers, course designers, experts,
teachers and all the concerned stakeholders is needed to evaluate and determine
usefulness of EMI in our context. Nonetheless, it is believed that this study provides
feedback to the policymakers, curriculum designers and administrators to make teachers
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
54 | P a g e
well trained, skillful and knowledgeable to establish harmonious relationships between
English and mother tongues and to handle multilingual classes effectively.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This article is based on the mini-research report submitted to the Centre for Research
Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal, which was completed on 8 October, 2020. So, I
duly acknowledge the the centre for providing me the research grant.
REFERENCES
AlBakri, S. (2017). Effects of English medium instruction on students' learning
experiences and quality of education in content courses in a public college in
Oman [Doctoral dissertation, Exter University]. Exter University.
https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/27743/ AlbakriS.pdf?
sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Awasthi, L. D. (2020, February 19). Angreji bhāsāle paramparāmāthi ãch [Impact of
English language over tradition]. Kantipur National Daily (online).
https://ekantipur.com/news/2 020/02/ 19158212312197956294.html/
Campbell, T. A. (2015). A phenomenological study on international doctoral students’
acculturation experiences at a US university. Journal of International Students,
5(3), 285-299.
Central Bureau of Statistic [CBS]. (2011). Population census. National Planning
Commission.
Chen, H., Han, J., & Wright, D. (2020). An investigation of lecturers’’ teaching through
English medium of instruction: A case of higher education in China.
Sustainability 12(10):4046. https: //doi.org/ 10.3390/su12104046
Cholakova, M. (2015). The influence of the English language in multilingual and a
monolingual environment: A comparative approach. International Journal of
English Language Teaching, 3, 4/35-78.
Constitution of Nepal. (2015). National information set.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
Díaz, M. P. (2015). Phenomenology in educational qualitative research: Philosophy as
science or philosophical science? International Journal of Educational
Excellence, 1(2), 101-110.
Education Manual. (2015). Constituent Assembly Secretariat, Singha Durbar.
http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/nep155698b.pdf
Ethnologue. (2016). https://www.ethnologue.com/country/NP
Ewie, C. O., & Eshun, E. S. (2015). The use of English as medium of instruction at the
upper basic level (primary four to junior high school) in Ghana: From theory to
practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (3), 72-83.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083758.pdf
Friedline, M. L. (2019). Pluralism and the roots of social conflict: Rethinking Rawls.
Religions, 10(20), 1-6. https:// doi.org/10.3390/rel10010020
Gil, J. A. (2005). English in China: The impact of the global language on China's
language situation [Ph. D. dissertation, School of International Business and
Asian Studies, Griffith Business School]. Griffith University.
Gopang, B. I., Bhugio, A. F., Umrani, T., & Lohar, A. S. (2015). English speaking
anxiety: A study of undergraduates at Lasbela University, Baluchistan.
International Researchers, 4(1), 45-60.
Graddol, D. (2002). The future of English. British Council.
Graddol, D. (2006). English next. British Council.
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
55 | P a g e
Honey, J. (1997). Language is power: The story of standard English and its enemies.
Faber and Faber.
Huang, D. (2015). Expanding and assessing effectiveness of English medium instruction
courses. The students’ perspectives. Procedia, Social and Behavioural
Sciences, 173, (71), 71-78.
Ibrahim, J. (2001, November 6-8). The implementation of EMI in Indonesian
Universities: Its opportunities, its threats, its problems and possible solution
[Paper presentation]. 49th International Teflin Conference, Bali.
http://kata.petra.ac.id/index.php/ing/article/view/15479
Ismaili, M. (2015). Teaching English in a multilingual setting: International Journal of
Information Research and Review, 2(4), 646- 648.
Kachru, B. (1985). The other tongue. University of Illinoi's Press.
Kachru, B. (1992). World Englishes: Approaches, issues and resources. Language
Teaching, 25, 1/ 1-14.
Kafle, N. P. (2011). Hermeneutic phenomenological research method simplified. Bodhi:
An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 181-200.
Ke, I. C. (2015). A global language, without a global culture: From basic English to
global English. English as a Global Language Education Journal, 1(1), 65-87.
Khati, A. R. (2016). English as a medium of instruction: my experience from a Nepali
hinterland. Journal of NELTA 21(1-2), 23-30.
Macaro, E. (2017). English medium instruction: Global views and countries in focus.
Language Teaching, 4, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000380
Macaro, E., Akincioglu, M. (2018). Turkish university students' perceptions about
English medium instruction: Exploring year group, gender and university type as
variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(3), 256-
270.
Mckay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language. Oxford University
Press.
Modiano, M. (2001). Linguistic imperialism, cultural integrity and EIL. ELT Journal,
55(4), 339-347.
Noom-Ura, S. (2013). English-teaching problems in Thailand and Thai teachers'
professional development needs. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 139.
Paudel, P. (2017, August). Teachers’ experiences on shifting medium of instruction to
English in Nepal. The WARWICK ELT. https://thewarwickeltezine.wordpress.
com/2017/08/31/503/
Pennycook, A. (2001) Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Lawrence
Erlbaum.
Pennycook, A. (2010) Language as a local practice. Routledge.
Phillipson, R. (2007). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, R. (2017). Myths and realities of “global” English. Language Policy, 16, 313–
331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016- 9409-z
Rassool, N. (2013) The political economy of English language and development: English
vs national and local languages in developing countries. In: Erling, E. J. &
Seargeant, P. (Eds.) English and Development: Policy, Pedagogy and
Globalization (pp.45-67). Multilingual Matters.
Sah, P. K. (2015). English Medium instruction (EMI) in Nepalese education: Potential or
problem? [Blog article] ELT Chautari. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
318299874_English_ medium_ instruction_EMI_in_Nepalese_education_
potential_or_problems
www.pncampus.edu.np Prithvi Journal of Research and Innovation
Using English as a Medium of Instruction: Challenges and Opportunities
56 | P a g e
Sah, P. K., & Li, G. (2018). English medium instruction (EMI) as linguistic capital in
Nepal: Promises and realities. International Multilingual Research
Journal, 12(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2017.1401448
Singh, N. K., Zhang, S., & Besmel, P. (2012). Globalization and language policies of
multilingual societies: Some case studies of South East Asia. RBLA, Belo
Horizonte, 12(2), 349-380.
Spickard, J. V. (2017). Diversity vs. pluralism: Reflections on the current situation in the
United States. Religions, 8(169), 1-11. https:// doi.org/10.3390/rel8090169
Teevno, R. A. (2011). Challenges in teaching and learning of English at secondary level
class X. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 1(2), 27.
Wanta, P. (2017 June 6). Nepal adhyanaka yi kisim-kisim prabriti [Different -different
trends of Nepal study]. Nepal Khabar. https://ujyaaloonline.com/ search/
?searchqr=2017+june+6