using analysis to improve the environment for transit · using analysis to improve the environment...
TRANSCRIPT
Using Analysis to Improve
the Environment for Transit
POWERFUL ANALYTIC TOOLS
Building
Types Development
Types
Scenario
Development Evaluation
1
Envision Tomorrow/ process
Step 1: Scenario development starts by creating a library of
building types that are financially feasible at the local level
Why start with buildings? Easily modeled & lots of existing data
• Density and Design
• Rents and Sales Prices
• Costs and Affordability
• Energy and Water Use
• Fiscal Impacts
Envision Tomorrow/ prototype buildings
…to Create a Range of Buildings
Use the ROI Model…
Envision Tomorrow/ process
Step 2: Define the buildings, streets and amenities that make up
all the “places” in which we live, work and play
Building
Types Development
Types
Scenario
Development Evaluation
2
Envision Tomorrow/ development types A Variety of Buildings, Streets and Amenities Create a “Place”
Town Residential
High Mix Neighborhood
Residential
Suburban
Residential
Envision Tomorrow/ as easy as painting
Detailed tables
Process/ monitor indicators on-the-fly
Quick reference graphs
• Increase Housing and Employment Density
• Maximize Infill Development
• Diversify Land Use Mix
• Make Neighborhoods Complete – all daily needs within walking
distance of XX% of households
• Include:
– higher intersection densities;
– greater sidewalk coverage;
– reduced building setbacks;
– Reduced street widths;
– a greater number of pedestrian crossings; and
– a higher number of street trees.
Land Use Measures that Increase
Transit (Walk, bike)
• Include accessibility factors such as:
– closer distance to employment for households;
– a higher number of jobs within 1 mile of housing;
– shorter distance to retail/services for housing;
– greater proximity to nearest retail employment;
– and shorter distance to transit stops
• Design regional transport so that
– More Employment within 10, 20, and 30 minutes of households;
– More employment within 30 minute transit ride of households
Reduce GHG Emissions through
Land Use
people
performance ped/bike
connectivity
places physical form
11/3/2011 11
Potential (market)
measuring TOD readiness (p’s)
11/3/2011 15
transit orientation score
11/3/2011 16
11/3/2011 17
11/3/2011 19
FEASIBLE PROTOTYPES
Pro-Forma Model
University Avenue and 200 Street – Existing
Provo, Utah
University Avenue and 200 Street – with public
improvements
Provo, Utah
University Avenue and 200 Street – public
improvements and mid-density scenario
Provo, Utah
University Avenue and 200 Street – public
improvements and higher-density scenario
Provo, Utah
University Avenue and 200 Street – public
improvements and higher-density scenario
Provo, Utah
University Avenue and 200 Street – public
improvements and highest-density scenario
Provo, Utah
Driving Question:
Can investing in public
amenities have a transformative
impact on development
feasibility in the region?
How Much Redevelopment Capacity
Does Our Region Really Have?
• Answer is not static – depends on market demand, rents/prices, and desirability of place.
• It’s estimated that about 50% of today’s high density multi-family zoned areas will go under-utilized during the next 20 years.
(2009 UGR and MetroScope analysis)
• Zoning capacity is significantly ahead of the market in some areas (and zoning certainly does not guarantee development).
• Developers unable to build to minimum densities in some areas or achieve maximum allowed in other areas.
45-60 foot condos built in
150 ft zone near Gateway
High Rise $102,879
Midrise (Structured)
$71,638
Type V (Podium) $5,034
Type V (Surface) $39,261
Duplex/Townhome
$34,495
$(120,000)
$(100,000)
$(80,000)
$(60,000)
$(40,000)
$(20,000)
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
High Rise $82,655
Midrise (Structured)
$51,183
Type V (Podium) $15,022
Type V (Surface) $60,816
Duplex/Townhome
$61,616
$(100,000)
$(80,000)
$(60,000)
$(40,000)
$(20,000)
$-
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
Small Shifts in Market
Can Greatly Increase Density
• Financial efficiency in construction isn’t a straight line
– Beyond a certain density, construction costs become increasingly expensive
– Cost increases driven by structured parking and steel vs. surface parking and wood construction materials
• Financial “sweet spots” dictate upper end of product range – vary by market area
• However, even small shifts in rent/prices can significantly change an area’s natural density limit
• Example: 10% difference in rent can tip the balance, more than doubling upper density limit
– Type V Podium Parking: 87 du/acre
– Type V Surface Parking: 31 du/acre
Current Situation: Type V not feasible
NOT Feasible
Feasible
10% Rent Increase: Type V is feasible
5 Basic Buildings Forms
High Rise Mid with
Structured
Type V with
Podium
Type V with
Surface
Duplex or
Townhome
518
du/ac
113
du/ac
87
du/ac
31
du/ac
21
du/ac
12
FAR
5.5
FAR
2
FAR
0.6
FAR
0.6
FAR
$185/sf $166/sf $115/sf $115/sf $115/sf
Density
Construction
Costs
Lake Oswego Study Area and Current Zoning
Study Area
Zoning • Focused around
commercial,
industrial and higher
density residential
core of Lake
Oswego
Lake Oswego: Current Conditions Redevelopable Parcels Under Current
Conditions:
Largely Amenitized
Lake Oswego: Fully Amenitized Redevelopable Parcels:
Highly Amenitized
10% increase in price/rent:
• Twice the Land Area
• Double the Units
Lake Oswego
Lake Oswego Conclusions
• Adding amenities to an already largely
amenitized area, such as Lake Oswego,
still significantly expands redevelopment
opportunities • 61% more land area
• New amenities increase achievable rents
by 10% and enable more costly parcels to
become feasible for redevelopment
• The added area can accommodate higher
value building types such as the Type V
Podium type • Type V Podium is efficiently parked and dense
• Being able to develop this product type
significantly increased the number of units able to
be built
Lake Oswego
10% increase in price/rent:
• 61% more Land Area
• 137% more Units
Lake Oswego 2nd Ave, between A Ave and B
Ave
Existing Conditions
Lake Oswego 2nd Ave, between A Ave and B
Ave
Initial Public Improvements
Lake Oswego 2nd Ave, between A Ave and B
Ave
Public Improvements
and Resulting Private Investment
PORTLAND 20-MINUTE
NEIGHBORHOODS
Process and Findings
Process: prototypes
Used 13 prototypes in the
analysis
11 of the prototypes were the
products of past work with
Portland BPS
We created 2 new, more
financially feasible versions of
mixed-use prototypes that
included surface parking
instead of underground or
tuck-under
Attached Houses - High Density
Attached Houses - Medium Density
Neighborhood Corridor Apartments, Surface Parking
Mixed-Use Slab Condo
Mixed-Use Apartments - Large Household
Mixed-Use Apartments - Large Household, Surface Parking
Mixed-Use Apartments - Small Household
Mixed-Use Apartments - Small Household, Surface Parking
Narrow Lot House
Neighborhood Mixed-Use
Plexes
Single Family, Medium Density
SRO Housing
Neighborhood Mixed-Use, Surface Parking
Field work – model developments
in SW Portland/Multnomah Village
4-story condos and townhomes 4-story apartments, townhomes and creek
restoration
Field work -- model developments in
St. Johns
3-story townhomes (one block off Lombard) 3-story condos (near Willamette River)
St Johns:
Maximum Land Cost by Building Building Name Existing 90% 100%
Attached Houses - High Density ($9.42) $3.78 $16.18
Attached Houses - Medium Density ($7.16) $6.87 $19.97
Neighborhood Corridor Apartments (SURFACE) ($41.93) ($28.17) ($14.83)
Mixed-Use Slab Condo ($1,200.94) ($1,082.58) ($969.82)
Mixed-Use Apartments (Large Household) ($281.58) ($245.11) ($209.90)
Mixed-Use Apartments (Small Household) ($295.78) ($258.01) ($220.84)
Narrow Lot House $5.05 $12.73 $19.94
Neighborhood Mixed-Use ($81.81) ($51.77) ($23.09)
Plexes ($4.72) $8.27 $21.29
Single Family, Medium Density $4.14 $9.97 $15.47
Mixed-Use SRO Housing ($127.65) ($127.65) ($127.65)
MU Apartments - Large Unit, Surface Parking ($54.35) ($36.18) ($18.31)
MU Apartments - Small Unit, Surface Parking ($63.57) ($83.59) ($22.94)
Neighborhood Mixed-Use (SURFACE PARKING ONLY) ($8.93) $15.26 $37.84
St Johns: Existing Conditions
St Johns: Largely Amenitized
St Johns: Highly Amenitized
Downtown St Johns: Existing
Downtown St Johns: 100% Amenitized
St Johns: Land Developed and Housing
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Acres Consumed
Developed Acres
Vacant Acres
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
BLI Existing (80%) 90% Amenitized 100% Amenitized
Housing & Mix
Multifamily
Townhome
Single Family
Mobile Home
Complete Streets Multi-Modal Approach
Canyon Rd., Beaverton
Thompson Blvd., Ventura
Thank You!