usca-dcc 14-5327 motion for judicial notice of usca-dcc 14-5325 as related case arpaio v obama...
TRANSCRIPT
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 1/78
M
O
T
IO
N
F
O
R J
U
D
I
C
IA
L N
O
T
IC
E
IN
A R
E
L
T
E
C
A
S
E
“B
R
IE
F
O
F
PL
A
IN
T
IF
F-
A
PP
EL
L
A
N
T
FO
R
R
E
VE
R
S
AL
O
F T
H
E
D
IS
TR
I
CT
CO
U
R
T’
S
O
RD
E
R
A
N
D R
E
QU
E
S
T
F
OR O
R
A
L A
R
G
UM
E
N
T
”
A
N
D
JO
IN
T
A
P
PE
N
D
IX
VO
L
U
M
ES
U
S
C
A
-D
C
C 1
4
C
V
53
2
5
A
R
P
A
I
O V
O
B
A
M
A
e
t
a
l
M
O
T
I
O
N F
O
R
JU
D
IC
I
A
L
N
O
T
IC
E I
N
A
R
EL
TE
C
A
S
E
“A
M
IC
U
S B
R
IE
F I
N SU
P
PO
R
T
O
F
P
L
A
IN
TI
FF
’S M
OT
IO
N
FO
R
PR
E
LI
M
IN
A
R
Y
I
N
JU
N
CT
I
ON
B
Y
J
O
E A
R
PA
IO
A
S
S
HE
R
IF
F
O
F
M
A
RI
CO
P
A
C
O
U
NT
Y
”
USDC-TXSD
14 cv 254
STATE
OF
TEXAS
et
al
v
UNITED STATES
O
F
A
M
E
R
IC
A
et
a
l
htt
ps
://
w
ww
s
cr
ib
d
co
m
/do
c/
25
4
41
57
25
/1
SO
1
29
F
in
al
A
rp
ai
o
Br
ie
f W
i
th
R
bb
on
h
ttp
s
://w
w
w
s
cr
ibd
c
om
/
do
c/
25
44
15
93
9
/1
5O
12
9
Jo
in
t
Ap
p
en
di
x V
o
I
i o
fI
h
ttp
s:
//w
w
w
sc
ri
bd
c
om
/d
oc
/2
54
4
16
25
2/
15
01
2
9 J
oi
nt
A
pp
e
nd
ix
V
oI
I I o
f
I
h
tt
ps
://
ww
w
s
cr
ib
d c
om
/
do
c/
25
35
89
4
79
/1
50
12
1
Am
i
cu
sB
re
fM
u
Iti
St
ate
L
fti
ga
tio
n
asF
iI
eU
ot
io
n
el
e
t
ro
n
i
se
r
v
il
C
er
tif
ic
ati
on
o
f
S
er
vic
e
by
e
le
c
tr
on
i
c s
er
vi
ce
on
:
R
.
r
ai
g L
aw
re
nc
e
A
U
S
A
U
SD
O
J
c
r
a
ig
l
aw
re
n
c
e
u
s
do
j
g
o
v
C
h
ri
s
to
p
h
er E
ar
l
S
tru
n
k
p
r
o
se
Pl
ain
ti
ff
A
pp
ell
an
t
c
e
st
ru
n
k
ya
h
o
o
c
o
m
Larry
Klayman
Esq
Attorney for Joe
Arpalo
leklayman gmail com
C
OU
R
T
O
F AP
P
EA
L
S
FO
R T
H
E
D
IS
TR
IC
T
O
F
C
O
LU
M
B
IA
C
IR
CU
I
T
1
4
c
v
5
32
7
Strunk
aI
v
D
ep
a
r
tm
e
n
t
o
f S
ta
t
e
e
t
a
l
H
a
ro
l
d
W
i
ll
ia
m
V
an
A
l
le
n
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 1 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 2/78
t
i
U
SC
A C
as
e 1
4
5
32
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
3
49
07
il
ed
0
1
/29
/2
01
5
Pa
ge
o
f
77
O
R
A
L
A
R
G
U
M
EN
T
N
O
T Y
E
T
S
C
H
ED
U
L
ED
C
o
ur
t
o
f
A
pp
ea
ls
No
14
5
3
25
IN
T
H
E
U
N
IT
ED
S
TA
T
ES
C
O
UR
T
O
F A
P
PE
A
LS
F
O
R T
H
E
D
IS
T
R
IC
T O
F
C
O
L
U
M
BI
A C
IR
C
U
IT
J
OS
E
PH
M
A
RP
A
IO
Pla
int
iff
A
p
pe
lla
nt
B
AR
A
C
K
O
B
AM
A
ET
A
L.
D
ef
en
da
nt
s
Ap
p
ell
ee
s.
A
PP
E
A
L
F
R
O
M
A
F
IN
A
L O
RD
E
R
O
f T
H
E
U
N
IT
ED
S
T
A
TE
S
DI
ST
R
IC
T
C
O
U
R
T
F
OR
T
H
E D
IS
TR
I
CT
O
F
C
O
LU
M
B
IA
iN
C
IV
IL
C
A
S
E N
O
.
1:1
4
cv
0
1
96
6
BA
H
B
R
IE
F
O
F PL
A
IN
T
IF
F
A
PP
E
LL
A
N
T
F
O
R
R
E
V
ER
S
A
L O
F
TH
E
D
IS
TR
I
CT
C
O
U
RT
’S
O
R
D
E
R
A
ND
R
E
Q
UE
S
T
F
OR
O
R
A
L
A
R
G
U
M
EN
T
L
ar
ry
K
lay
m
an
E
sq
F
RE
E
D
OM
W
A
T
CH
I
N
2
02
0
P
er
m
sy
lva
n
ia A
v
e.
N
W
S
u
ite
45
W
a
sh
in
gt
on
D
C
20
00
6
Te
l:
31
0
59
5
08
00
E
m
ail
:
1e
kl
ay
ma
n
gm
ai
1.
co
m
At
to
rn
ey
f
or
P
la
int
iff
A
p
pe
lla
nt
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 2 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 3/78
U
S
CA
Ca
se
1
4
53
25
Do
c
um
en
t
15
34
9
07
Fil
ed
0
1
/29
/2
01
5
Pa
g
e
2 o
f 7
7
C
E
R
TI
FI
C
AT
E
A
S
T
O
P
A
R
TI
ES
,
R
U
L
IN
G
S, A
N
D
R
EL
A
T
ED
C
A
SE
S
Plaintiff-Appellant
Sheriff
Joseph
M.
Arpaio hereby certifies
p
ur
su
an
t
to
C
i
rcu
it
R
u
le
2
a)
l
) tha
t:
A
P
art
ie
s
an
d A
m
id
T
he
p
art
ie
s
th
at
a
pp
ea
re
d
i
n th
e
U
S
D
is
tr
ict
C
ou
rt
f
or
th
e
D
ist
ric
t
of
Co
lu
m
bi
a
“
D
ist
ric
t
C
o
ur
t”)
a
re
P
la
int
iff
-A
p
pe
lla
nt
J
os
ep
h
M
. A
rp
ai
o,
e
le
ct
ed
S
he
rif
f o
f
M
a
nc
op
a C
ou
n
ty,
A
r
izo
n
a
“S
he
rif
f
A
rp
aio
”
).
D
ef
en
da
n
ts-
Ap
p
ell
ee
s
1
M
r
B
ara
c
k
H
u
sse
in
O
b
am
a
Pr
es
id
en
t
o
f
th
e
U
ni
te
d
S
ta
te
s o
f A
m
e
ric
a
“P
re
si
de
nt
O
b
am
a
”),
2
M
r
Je
h J
oh
n
so
n,
S
ec
re
tar
y of
th
e
U
S D
ep
ar
tm
en
t
of
Ho
m
el
an
d
S
ec
uri
ty
“D
H
S”
),
a
n
d
3
M
r.
L
eo
n
Ro
d
rig
ue
z,
Director
of
U S
Citizenship
and
Immigration
Services
“US
C
IS
”)
.
N
o
m
i
d
Cu
ri
ae
pa
rti
cip
a
ted
a
t t
he
D
ist
ric
t C
o
ur
t
le
v
el
B
R
ul
in
gs
U
n
de
r R
e
vie
w
T
h
e
r
ul
in
gs u
nd
er
re
vi
ew
ar
e
th
e H
on
or
ab
le
B
er
yl
H
ow
e
ll’
s
“J
ud
ge
H
ow
e
ll”
)
D
ec
em
b
er
23
2
0
14
M
e
m
or
an
du
m
O
pi
nio
n a
nd
[F
in
al
]
O
rd
er
in
th
e
D
is
tri
ct
Co
u
rt
g
ra
nt
in
g D
ef
en
da
nt
s’
m
ot
ion
t
o
di
sm
is
s f
or
la
ck
o
f s
tan
d
ing
u
nd
er
F
e
de
ral
R
ul
es
o
f Ci
vi
l
P
ro
ce
du
re
“F
R
CP
”)
R
u
le
2
b
) 1
,
w
h
ich
di
sm
is
se
d
all
c
la
im
s
a
nd
en
te
re
d
ju
dg
m
en
t
fo
r D
e
fen
d
an
ts.
Ju
dg
e
H
o
w
el
l’s
fm
a
l o
rd
er
t
erm
i
na
te
d
the
c
as
e
in the
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
ur
t
It
w
a
s n
ot
ho
w
ev
er
, a
su
bs
tan
ti
ve
ru
li
ng
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 3 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 4/78
U
S
C
A
Ca
se
14
5
32
5
D
oc
um
e
nt
15
34
90
7
F
ile
d
: 01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e
3 o
f 77
o
n
t
he m
e
rit
s b
ut
a
ru
li
ng o
n
s
ta
nd
in
g
so
le
ly o
n th
e
p
le
ad
in
gs
.
C.
Related
Cases
W
it
hi
n
thi
s
C
ir
cu
it,
S
he
rif
f A
r
pa
io
is n
ot
a pa
rt
y
to
an
y
rel
at
ed
li
tig
at
io
n.
Ap
p
ell
an
t is
no
t a
w
ar
e o
f a
ny
ot
he
r
li
tig
a
tio
n co
nc
er
ni
ng
ex
ac
tly
the
s
am
e
iss
u
es
w
i
th
reg
a
rd
to th
e E
xe
cu
tiv
e
B
ran
ch
’s
d
ef
er
red
a
ct
io
n p
ro
gr
am
s
in
t
his
Ci
rc
uit
.
H
o
we
ve
r, th
e
ca
se
o
f W
a
sh
ing
to
n
A
lli
an
ce
of T
e
ch
no
lo
gy
W
o
rk
er
s
U
S
.
D
e
pa
rt
me
nt
of
Ho
m
el
an
d
Se
cu
ri
ty
,
C
iv
il A
ct
io
n
N
o
4
5
2
9
E
S
H
,
in t
he
D
i
str
ic
t
C
ou
rt
ra
is
es
s
im
ila
r
ch
al
len
g
es
t
o o
th
er
asp
e
cts
o
f th
e
A
pp
el
le
es’
im
m
igr
at
io
n
p
ro
gr
am
s.
M
o
re
ov
er
, in
t
he
U
S
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
ur
t fo
r t
he
So
ut
he
rn
D
is
tri
ct o
f T
ex
as
B
ro
wn
sv
il
le
D
iv
isi
on
,
th
e Ho
no
ra
b
le
A
n
dr
ew
S
H
a
ne
n
i
s
de
ci
di
ng
a n
ea
rl
y
identical
case
S
ta
te
o
f T
ex
as
et
al
U
n
ite
d S
ta
tes
of A
m
eri
ca
,
C
ivi
l
C
a
se
N
o
1
:1
4-
cv
-2
54
.
Th
e
b
rie
fm
g
sc
he
du
le ca
lls
f
or t
he
la
st f
ili
ng
o
n
Ja
nu
ar
y 2
9
20
1
5
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 4 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 5/78
U
S
C
A
Ca
se
14
5
32
5
D
oc
u
me
nt 1
53
4
90
7
P
il
ed
:
01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e
4
o
f 7
7
T BLE OF
CONTENTS
C
ER
T
IF
IC
TE
A
S
T
O
P
R
TI
ES
R
U
LI
N
GS
N
D
R
E
L
T
E
D C
S
E
S
i
T
B
L
E
O
F
UT
H
O
RI
T
IE
S
vi
GL
O
S
S
R
Y
x
ii
JU
R
IS
DI
C
TI
ON
L
ST
T
EM
E
N
T
IS
S
UE
S
PR
E
SE
N
T
ED
2
S
T
TU
T
ES
ND
C
O
N
ST
I
TU
T
IO
N
L
PR
O
V
IS
IO
N
S
4
S
T
T
E
M
EN
T
O
f T
H
E C
S
E
4
S
T
TE
M
E
N
T
OF
F
CT
S
7
S
T
ND
R
D
O
F R
EV
I
EW
SU
M
M
R
Y
O
f
RG
U
M
E
NT
4
RG
U
M
E
N
T
9
I
A
p
pe
lle
es
’ P
ro
gr
am
s
are
U
nc
on
sti
tu
tio
na
l U
s
ur
pa
tio
n
of
L
eg
is
lat
iv
e Po
w
er
9
A
Pr
es
ide
n
t d
oe
s n
o
t
s
ha
re
L
e
gi
sla
tiv
e
P
ow
er
w
ith
C
o
ng
re
ss
9
B
Th
e
D
ist
ric
t
C
ou
rt re
as
on
ed
tha
t “
de
fe
rr
ed
ac
tio
n
”
p
ro
gr
am
s
by
th
e
E
x
ec
uti
ve
B
ra
nc
h
in
th
e
pa
st
pro
v
id
e l
eg
al
au
th
or
ity
no
w
5
C
Th
e
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
ur
t a
na
ly
ze
d th
at
C
on
gr
es
s ha
s
e
nd
o
rse
d th
e
u
se
o
f
“
de
fe
rre
d ac
ti
on
”
in
c
er
tai
n
cir
cu
m
st
an
ce
s y
et
h
as
n
ot do
ne
so he
re
6
II
ppellees ’
Programs
Mus
t
Comply
wi
th
d
m
in
ist
ra
tiv
e
Pr
oc
ed
u
res
c
t
6
II
I
p
pe
ll
an
t ha
s
sh
ow
n
v
al
id
g
ro
un
ds
fo
r a
p
re
lim
i
na
ry
in
ju
nc
tio
n
3
IV
Di
str
ic
t
Co
u
rt
E
rr
ed
i
n
Di
sm
is
si
ng
fo
r
La
ck
o
f S
tan
d
ing
3
4
A
fo
r sta
n
din
g
on
ly
o
ne
b
as
is
is
su
ffi
ci
en
t
34
B
Th
e
D
is
tr
ict
C
ou
rt a
na
ly
ze
d t
he
fa
ct
ua
l
ba
se
s f
or
st
an
din
g
b
y
di
sb
el
iev
in
g
pp
el
lan
t’
s al l
eg
at
io
ns
i
n t
he
c
om
p
lai
nt
r
ath
er
th
an
t
ak
ing
as
tr
ue
al
l
a
lle
g
ati
on
s of
f
ac
t
a
nd
all
inf
er
en
ce
s
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 5 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 6/78
USC
A
C
ase
1
4 53
25
Doc
ume
nt
15 3
490
7
FU
ed:
01/2
9120
15
Page
5
of
7
7
in supp
ort
of
sta
ndin
g
3
4
C
App
ellan
t
all
eged
s
uffic
ient
in
jurie
s
to estab
lish
stand
ing
3
8
D
T
he Di
stric
t
Co
urt
anal
yzed
the
fac
tual
ba
ses
f
or
App
ellan
t’s
sta
ndin
g
by
rej
ectin
g
S
heri
ffA
rpa
io’s
pred
icti
on
o
f futur
e
har
m
grou
nde
d
in
pa
st
em
piri
cal
ex
perie
nce
46
E
The D
istric
t
C
ourt
ana
lyze
d
App
ellan
t’s
stand
ing
in te
rms
of
“re
dres
sabi
lity”
fr
om
f
avor
able
c
ourt
actio
n al
thou
gh
cu
rren
t
g
over
ning
law
requ
ires
all
illeg
al
alien
s
t
o b
e d
epor
ted
5
F
Th
e D
istr
ict
Co
urt an
alyz
ed
Ap
pella
nt’s
stan
ding
a
s
bei
ng
caus
ed
by
thir
d-pa
rty
acto
rs
who
se
ac
ts
not c
redi
ted
to
Gov
ernm
ent
5
G
Sta
ndin
g
ana
lysis
is n
ot
a
s host
ile
a
s the
Dis
trict
C
ourt’
s an
alys
is
52
H
Th
e
D
istri
ct
Cour
t ig
nore
d
the “
proc
edu
ral
in
jury”
an
d
in
fring
eme
nt
of
th
e op
erat
ions
of
Sh
eriff
Arpa
io’
s o
ffice
,
simi
lar
to
A
rizo
na
v
Un
ited
State
s o
f
A
mer
ica,
3
2
S
Ct
9
20
12
55
I
The
Di
stric
t
Co
urt con
strue
d
App
ellan
t’s
case a
nd
an
alyz
ed
st
andi
ng on
ly
in
re
latio
n
to “po
licym
aki
ng
b
etter
lef
t
to th
e
poli
tical
bran
ches
”
an
d “g
ene
raliz
ed
grievances which
a
re
not
pro
per
for
th
e
Ju
dicia
ry
to
addr
ess.”
5
7
J
Th
e
D
istri
ct
C
ourt
an
alyz
ed
Ap
pella
nt’s
stan
ding
in
rel
atio
n
to
D
efen
dant
s
in
tern
ally
pri
oritiz
ing
an
d
p
lann
ing
enfo
rcem
ent
a
ction
s
6
C
ON
CLU
SIO
N
6
CER
TIF
ICA
TE
O
F
CO
MPL
IAN
CE
63
CE
RTIF
ICA
TE
OF
S
ERV
ICE
63
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 6 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 7/78
U
S
CA C
a
se
1
4-
53
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
9
07
il
ed
0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
ag
e
6
of 7
7
T
A
B
LE
O
F
A
U
T
HO
R
IT
I
ES
C
as
es
A
big
a
il A
l
lia
nc
e
f
or
B
et
ter
Ac
ce
ss
to D
ev
el
op
m
en
ta
l
D
ru
gs
E
sc
he
nb
ac
h,
46
9
F.
3d
1
2
9
D
.C
.
Ci
r. 2
00
6
48
A
d
am
s
v
R
ic
ha
rd
so
n,
48
0
F.
2d
1
15
9
D
C
Ci
r.
19
73
22
Alliance
for
Democracy v
FEC,
362
F. Supp.
2d
13
D D C 2005
14
A
m
.
F
ed
’n
of
G
o
v’
t Em
p
s.
,
AF
L
—
C
IO
L
o
ca
l 4
46
N
ic
ho
lso
n
, 4
75
F
.3
d 3
41
D
C
Ci
r. 2
00
7
A
m
. N
a
t’l
I
ns
. C
o.
v
F
DI
C,
64
2 F.
3d
11
37
D
.C
. C
ir
.
2
01
1
13
A
m
.
T
ru
ck
in
g,
53
1 U
.S
.
a
t
48
4-
86
,
1
21
S
.C
t.
90
3
49
*
Am
e
ri
ca
n
T
ru
ck
in
g
A
s
so
cia
ti
on
s,
I
nc
.
U
S. E
n
vi
ro
nm
e
nta
l
Pr
ote
ct
io
n
A
g
en
cy
19
5
F
.3
d
4
D.
C. C
ir.
19
9
9
5
A
m
er
ic
an
Tr
uc
ki
ng
A
ss
oc
ia
tio
ns
,
In
c.
U
n
ite
d
S
tat
es
E
nv
ir
on
m
en
ta
l
Pr
ot
ec
tio
n
A
ge
nc
y
,
17
5 f
.3
d
1
02
7 D
C
C
ir. 1
99
9
5
*Arizona
United States,
132
S.
Ct.
2492
2012 6
0
*A
ri
zo
na
v
U
nit
ed
Sta
te
s,
64
1 F
.
3
d
33
9
9t
h
C
i
r.
20
1
1
5
5
B
a
ke
r
v
C
ar
r,
3
6
9 U
S
18
6
2
05
,
8
2
5.
C
t.
69
1,
7 L
Ed
.2
d
6
63
19
6
2
4
9
Au
th
or
iti
es
c
hi
ef
ly
r
el
ied
u
p
on
ar
e
m
ar
ke
d w
ith
as
te
ris
ks
.
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 7 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 8/78
U
SC
A
C
a
se
1
4
53
25
D
oc
um
e
nt
15
34
9
07
P
ile
d
: 0
1/2
9
/20
1
5
Pa
ge
7
o
f
7
7
B
a
rr
v
Cl
in
ton
,
37
0
F
.3
d
1
19
6,
1
19
9
D
.C
.
Ci
r. 20
04
)
1
3
Bennett
v
Spear,
520
U.S.
154,
162
1 997)
59
C
ity Fe
d.
F
in
.
C
or
p.
v
Of
fic
e o
f T
h
rft
S
up
er
vi
sio
n
, 5
8
F
.3d
73
8
D.
C.
C
ir
.
19
9
5
1
1,
31
C
tr. f
or L
a
w
E
d
uc
.
De
p
’t o
fE
d
uc
.,
3
96
F.
3d
11
52
D.
C.
C
ir
.
2
00
5)
50
E
lr
od
B
u
rn
s, 42
7
U
.S
.
3
47
,
37
3
1
97
6
32
F
og
o de
Ch
ao
H
old
in
gs
)
In
c.
U
S. D
e
p
o
f H
o
m
el
an
d S
ec
.,
76
9
F
.3
d
1
1
27
D
.C
.
C
ir
. 20
14
)
60
*
Fr
at
er
na
l
O
rd
e
r
of
t
he Po
lic
e
U
n
ite
d St
at
es
,
1
52
F
.3
d 9
98
D
.
C.
C
ir
.
1
99
8)
...
56
H
aa
se
Se
ss
io
ns
,
8
35
F.
2d
9
0
2 D
.C
. C
ir
.
19
87
13
Harisiades
haughnessy,
342
U.
S.
580
1952)
2
0
H
a
rlo
w
F
it
zg
er
ald
,
45
7
U.
S.
8
0
0
19
82
13
H
en
k
ev
. U
ni
te
d
S
ta
te
s,
60 F
.3
d 7
9
5
Fe
d.
Ci
r.
19
9
5
1
2
He
rb
er
t v
N
a
tio
na
lA
c
ad
em
y
ofSc
ie
nc
es
,
9
74
F.2
d
1
92
D.
C. C
ir.
1
99
2
13
He
rt
z
Co
rp
. v.
F
rie
nd
,
5
59
U
.S . 7
7 2
01
0)
1
4
H
o
lli
ng
sw
o
rth
P
er
ry
, 13
3
5.
C
t.
26
5
2 2
01
3)
59
H
o
ne
yw
e
ll
In
ter
n
In
c.
EP
A
, 3
7
4
F
.3d 1
36
3
D
.C
. C
ir.
2
00
4)
5
4
In
re
M
e
d
ica
re Re
im
b
ur
se
me
n
t L
it
iga
ti
on
, 4
14
F
.3
d
7
D
.C
. C
ir
.
20
05
)
33
*
1
H
a
mp
to
n,
J
r.
Co
. v
.
Un
it
ed
S
tat
es
, 27
6
U
.S
. 39
4,
40
5—
0
6
19
28
)
1
9
v
ii
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 8 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 9/78
U
S
C
A
Ca
se
14
-5
32
5
D
oc
um
e
nt
15
3
49
07
P
il
ed
: 01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e
8
o
f
7
7
Ja
ck
so
n
vil
le Fo
rt
A
ut
h.
Ad
a
ms
,
5
56
F.2
d
5
2
D
.C
. C
u
.
19
77
3
3
Lairdv.
Tatum ,
408
U.S.
1 1972
53
L
o
mo
n
t v
‘N
ei
l,
28
5 F
.3d
9
D.
C.
C
ir
. 2
00
2
56
L
uja
n
v
D
ef
en
de
rs
of W
i
ld
lif
e,
50
4
U
.S
. 5
55 1
9
92
)
50
, 52
M
a
th
ew
s
v
D
ia
z,
4
26
U
.S
.
6
7
1
97
6
20
M
o
m
s
A
g
ai
ns
tM
e
rc
wy
v
F
DA
,
48
3 F
.3
d
82
4 D
.C
.
C
ir.
20
07
14
M
c
Nu
tt
v
G
en
.
M
o
to
rs A
c
ce
pt
an
ce
C
o
rp
. o
fm
d.,
2
9
8 U
.S
. 17
8
19
36
1
2
*
M
u
lls
v
Di
str
ic
t
of
C
ol
um
b
ia
,
57
1
F.
3d
1
30
4
D
.C
.
C
ir
. 2
00
9
3
2
N
.
M
a
ri
an
a
Is
lan
ds
v
U
n
ite
d S
ta
tes
, 6
86
F
.
S
u
pp
.
2
d
7
D.
D.
C.
20
09
3
4
N
a
t ‘lA
s
s
‘n
ofH
om
e B
ui
ld
er
s v
D
e
fen
d
ers
o
f
W
ild
lf
e,
5
51
U
.S
.
64
4
20
07
2
1
*Natural
Res.
Def
Council
v
Envtl.
Prot.
Agency
D.C. Cir.,
Case
Nos.
98—1
37
9,
9
8
—
14
29
, 9
8—
1
4
31
, Ju
ne
27
20
14
48
N
at
ur
al R
e
so
ur
ce
s D
efe
n
se
C
ou
nc
il
v
E
n
vi
ron
m
en
ta
l
Pr
ot
ec
tio
n
A
g
en
cy
6
4
3
F
.3
d
31
1
D
.C
. C
ir. 2
0
11
4
7
O
’D
on
n
ell
Co
n
st.
C
o. v
D
is
tr
ict
o
fCo
lu
m
bi
a, 9
63
F.
2d
4
2
0
D
.C
.
C
ir
. 19
92
3
3
P
a
tto
n
v
Un
it
ed S
tat
es
, 6
4 Fe
d.
Cl
.
76
8 2
0
05
1
3
Re
yn
o
lds
v A
rm
y
A
ir F
o
rc
e
E
xc
h. S
er
v.
, 8
46
F
.2d
7
46
F
ed
.
C
ir.
1
98
8
13
S
ch
e
ue
r
v
R
h
od
es
,
41
6
U
.S
.
2
32
19
74
13
Se
re
tse
-K
h
am
a
v
As
h
cro
ft
, 21
5
F
.
Su
pp
.
2d
3
7 D
.D
.C
. 2
00
2
3
4
’
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 9 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 10/78
U
SCA
as
e
14 5
325
Doc
ume
nt
153
4907
Fil
ed:
01/2
9/20
15
ag
e
o
7
7
S
e
ro
no La
bo
ra
to
rie
s, Inc.
S
ha
la
la, 15
8
F.3
d 1
313
D
.C . C
ir.
19
98
3
1
Settles
United
States
Parole
Comm’n,
429
F.3d
1098 D.C.
Cir.
2005
13
S
ier
ra C
lub
J
ew
e
ll, 76
4
F.
3d
D.
C.
C
ir. 2
01
4
54
T
h
om
a
s
P
rin
ci
pi
,
39
4 F
.3
d
9
70
D.
C. Ci
r.
20
0
5
13
Th
o
ms
on G
ask
il
l, 3
15 U
.S
.
4
42
1
94
2
14
To l
l
v. M
or
en
o,
45
8 U.
S.
19
8
2
20
Un
it
ed S
ta
te
s
C
u
rti
ss
-W
ri
gh
t
Ex
p
ort C
o
rp
.,
29
9 U.
S. 3
04
1
93
6
2
0
U
ni
te
d
S
ta
tes
Va
le
nz
ue
la
-B
er
na
l, 458 U
.S
. 8
58
19
82
60
U
til it
y
Ai
r
Re
g
ula
to
ry
Gr
ou
p
v.
E
.P.A
. 13
4
S
.Ct.
24
27
Jun. 2
3 2
01
4
21
W
a
rt
h
S
eld
in
, 42
2
U.
S. 4
90
1
97
5
12,
5
9
Washington
Alliance
of
Technology
Workers
U.S.
Department
of
Homeland
S
ec
ur
ity
,
Ci
vi
l A
cti
on N
o
.
14
-5
2
9
E
S
H
iii,
53
W
ay
man
So
ut
ha
rd
23 U
.
S. 10 W
h
e
at.
18
2
5
23
J47
hitm
an
A
d
m
in
ist
ra
tor
o
f E
nv
iro
nm
e
nt
al P
ro
te
ct
ion Ag
ency
,
e
t at
.
A
m
er
ic
an
Tr
uc
ki
ngA
s
so
cia
ti
on
s, In
c. e
t.
al.
531
U
.
S.
4
57
Fe
br
ua
ry 2
00
1
5
,
12
*
yo
un
g
sto
w
n
Sh
ee
t
Tu
be Co
.
S
awy
er
343
U
.s
. 579
1
9
52
21
23
C
o
ns
tit
ut
io
na
l
P
ro
vi
sio
ns
U.
S.
C
on
st
.,
Ar
t. I
,
8
, ci.
4
19
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 10 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 11/78
U
SC
A
C
a
se
14
5
3
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t 1
53
49
0
7
i
le
d
0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
ag
e 1
0
of 77
U
S
C
on
st
.,
A
r
t
II
19
21
,
3
2
U
.S
.
Co
n
st.
,
A
rt
III
2
4
U
.
S. Co
ns
t.
,
A
m
e
nd
.
X
l
4
S
tat
ut
es
8U
S
C
12
9
1
28
U
.S.
C
.21
O
7
28U.S
.C
.l
33
1
28
U.
S.
C.
13
32
4
2
U
.S
.C
.
19
73
c
5
U
.S
.C
.
5
5
3 e
ts
eq
4
U
.S
.C
.
70
2
th
ro
ug
h 7
06
4
U
.S
.C
.
1
2
29
a
a
3
20
U
.
S.
C.
12
2
7
1
22
9
a
12
31
2
0
U
.S.
C
.
§
11
01
,e
t se
q
4
A
dm
in
is
tra
ti
ve
P
ro
ce
du
re
s Ac
t
i
x 2
4 1
5 1
6
2
5
26
,2
7, 2
8
29
3
31
6
61
Im
m
ig
ra
ti
on a
nd
N
a
tu
ral
iz
ati
on A
ct
i
x
4
20
SB
1O
7
O
5
5
R
ul
es
Fe
de
ra
l R
u
les
o
fAp
p
ell
at
e
P
ro
ce
d
ure R
u
le
4
a
1
A
Fe
de
ra
l Ru
le
s
of
C
iv
il P
ro
ce
du
re
ii
ix
6
R
ul
e
1
2
b
1
ii
6
11
1
2
13
14
1
7
3
8
3
9
R
u
le
4
a
1
A
Ru
le
6
5
1
d
of
the
L
o
ca
l R
u
les
6
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 11 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 12/78
US
CA C
ase
14
5325
Docu
men
t
1534
907 Fil
ed: 01
/29
/201
5 Pa
ge 1
1 of
7
7
Oth
er Aut
horit
ies
Not
e, R
em
edie
s
for N
onco
mpl
ianc
e
wit
h
Sec
tio n
o
f the A
dmi
nistr
ativ
e
Pr
oced
ure
Ac
t:
A
Crit
ical
Ev
alua
tion
of Uni
ted S
tates
S
teel an
d
W
ester
n
O
il
Gas
,
1
982
D
uke L
J
461
,462
1
982
29
Pre
side
ntial
Auth
ority
to Dec
line
to
Exe
cute U
nco
nstit
utio
nal S
tatu
tes, 1
8 O
p
O
.LC.
19
9
2
1
994
22
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 12 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 13/78
U
S
C
A
C
as
e
14
5
3
25
D
oc
um
e
nt
15
34
90
7
Fi
led
:
01
/2
9/2
0
15
Pa
ge
o
f
77
G
L
O
SS
A
RY
“
FR
A
P
”
re
fe
rs
to
th
e
Fe
de
ra
l R
ul
es
o
f
A
p
pe
lla
te
P
ro
ce
du
re
“
FR
C
P
”
re
fe
rs
to
t
he
Fe
de
ra
l
Ru
le
s
o
f
C
iv
il
Pr
oc
ed
u
re
“
AP
A
”
re
fe
rs t
o
th
e
A
d
m
ini
st
rat
iv
e
Pr
oc
ed
ur
es
A
c
t
“I
NA
”
re
fer
s
t
o
t
he
Im
m
ig
ra
tio
n a
n
d
Na
tu
ra
liz
at
ion
A
ct
as am
e
nd
e
d
“
D
H
S”
re
fe
rs
to
th
e
D
ep
ar
tm
en
t
o
f
H
o
m
el
an
d
S
ec
ur
ity
“US
C
IS
”
re
fe
rs
t
o th
e
U
S
C
iti
ze
ns
hi
p a
n
d
Im
m
ig
ra
tio
n
Se
rv
ic
e
a
c
om
p
on
e
nt w
it
hi
n
th
e
U
S
D
ep
a
rtm
e
nt
of
H
o
m
ela
nd
S
ec
ur
ity
“
IC
E
”
re
fe r
s
to
the
Im
m
ig
ra
ti
on
a
nd
C
u
sto
m
s En
fo
rc
em
e
nt
[S
erv
ic
e]
a
co
m
po
n
en
t
w
ith
in t
he
U
S D
e
pa
rt
me
n
t
of
H
om
e
lan
d
S
e
cu
rit
y
“A
li
en
”
is the
le
g
all
y
c
or
rec
t
te
rm r
ef
er
rin
g
to
a ci
tiz
en
o
f
a
c
ou
nt
ry
ot
he
r
tha
n
th
e
U
.S
.A
.,
w
he
n
us
ed i
n
r
ela
ti
on
t
o the
U
S
A
H
ow
e
ve
r
a
c
iti
ze
n
o
f t
he
U
S
A
is
an
A
li
en
w
he
n p
re
se
nt
i
n ot
he
r
c
o
un
tri
es
w
ith
r
eg
ar
d
to
t
ha
t
other
country
“I
lle
ga
l
l
ie
n”
re
fe
rs
t
o an
A
lie
n
wh
o
en
te
red
t
he
U
nit
ed
S
ta
te
s
in
vio
la
tio
n
of
U
S
la
w or
r
em
ai
ne
d
in
th
e
co
un
tr
y
aft
er
la
wf
ul s
ta
tu
s
ex
pir
ed
T
h
e
st
atu
s
im
p
lie
s t
ha
t
n
o
la
wf
ul
ca
teg
o
ry
fo
r le
ga
l
pre
se
nc
e
is ap
pl
ic
ab
le
o
r av
ai
lab
le
t
o
su
ch
pe
rso
n
“
Un
d
oc
um
e
nte
d
I
m
mi
gr
an
t”
if
u
s
ed
c
o
rre
ct
ly
r
efe
rs
to a
n
l
ie
n w
h
o
is e
nti
tle
d
to
a l
aw
fu
l
i
m
mi
gr
ati
on
s
ta
tu
s
bu
t wh
o
se a
p
pl i
ca
tio
n
is s
til
l
b
ein
g
pr
oc
es
se
d
“D
A
C
A
” re
fe
rs
to
a
r
eg
ul
at
ory
p
ro
gr
am
cr
eated
by
President Barack
Obama
and
his
A
dm
i
nis
tr
ati
on
on
J
un
e
5
2
01
2
ca
lle
d
D
ef
er
re
d
A
c
tio
n f
or
Ch
il
dh
oo
d
A
rri
va
ls,
gr
an
tin
g
a
m
ne
sty
im
m
u
ni
ty
fro
m p
ros
ec
u
tio
n
or
de
p
or t
at
io
n
an
d
af
fir
m
ati
ve
be
ne
fi
ts
to
ad
ul
t Il l
eg
al
li
en
s
wh
o
o
rig
in
al
ly
e
nt
er
ed
th
e
U
S
A
a
s
c
h
ild
re
n
“D
A
P
A”
i
s
a
te
rm
so
m
eti
m
es
u
se
d t
o
re
fe
r
to s
om
e p
or
tio
ns
o
f
t
he
A
pp
el
lee
s’
N
o
ve
m
be
r
2
0
20
14
am
ne
st
y
pr
og
ra
m
s,
ap
pa
re
nt
ly
m
e
an
in
g De
fe
rr
ed
A
ct
io
n
fo
r
Pa
re
nt s
o
f
A
m
er
ic
an
s.
p
pe
ll
ee
s
di
d n
ot
or
ig
in
all
y
d
es
ig
na
te th
e
ir n
ew
x
ii
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 13 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 14/78
U
S
C
A
C
ase
14
5
3
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t
1
5
34
90
7
i
le
d
0
1/
29
/2
01
5
Pa
ge
1
3 of 7
7
pr
og
ra
m
s
w
it
h
pr
oj
ec
t n
am
e
b
ut h
av
e
b
eg
u
n
to
us
e
t
he
n
am
e D
P
D
efe
rr
ed
ac
tio
n re
fe r
s
to
a p
rac
ti
ce i
nv
en
te
d by
th
e o
ffi
ce
s o
f t
he
E
xe
cu
tiv
e
Branch responsible
for
enforcement
of
immigration
laws to
decline
to
pursue
d
ep
or
tat
io
n of i
lle
ga
l a
lie
ns
in c
er
ta i
n s
itu
at
ion
s
o
ri
gin
a
lly f
or
su
ch
pu
rp
os
es a
s
br
id
gi
ng
ti
m
e
ga
p
in
law
f
ul sta
tu
s
wh
il
e
an
a
p
pli
ca
tio
n
s b
ein
g
pr
oc
es
se
d
“
En
fo
rc
em
e
nt
Di
sc
re
tio
n”
ap
pe
ar
s t
o b
e
a c
on
ce
pt u
se
d
b
y t
he Ex
e
cu
tiv
e
B
ra
nc
h
r
ef
er
rin
g
to th
e
al
lo
ca
tio
n of
e
n
for
ce
m
en
t res
ou
rc
es
to se
arc
h f
or
v
iol
at
ion
s o
f
t
he
la
w
in co
n
tra
st
to
p
ro
se
cu
to
ria
l
dis
cr
et
ion de
al
in
g w
it
h
a
n
a
ct
ua
l
ca
se
of
al
leg
e
d
v
io
la
tio
n b
y
sp
ec
ifi
ca
lly
id
e
nti
fie
d i
nd
iv
id
ua
l
“Executive Branch”
refer s
to
the
branch
of
the
U.S.
Government established under
A
r
tic
le II
o
f th
e
U
.S . C
on
st
itu
tio
n
in
clu
di
ng
the
P
re
sid
en
t
a
nd t
he
Fe
de
ra
l
D
ep
ar
tm
en
ts an
d
ge
nc
ie
s u
nd
er
th
e P
re
sid
e
nt’
s
s
up
e
rv i
si
on
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 14 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 15/78
U
SC
A
C
as
e
14
5
32
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
90
7
ile
d
01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e
1
4
of
7
7
JU
R
IS
D
IC
T
IO
N
A
L
S
TA
T
E
M
EN
T
T
h
e
D
is
tri
ct Co
ur
t h
ad
ju
ris
di
ct
io
n ov
e
r th
is
ca
se
pu
rsu
a
nt t
o
2
U
.S
.C
.
§
13
31
as the
re
is a c
on
tro
v
ers
y
a
ris
in
g un
d
er
F
ed
er
al la
w
a
nd
lo
r t
he
U
S
C
on
sti
tu
tio
n. T
his
U
.S
. C
ou
rt
ofA
pp
ea
ls
fo
r th
e
D
ist
ric
t
o
f
C
ol
um
b
ia C
ir
cu
it
“
D.
C.
C
i
rcu
it
”
h
as
ju
ris
di
ct
ion o
ve
r th
is
a
pp
ea
l f
ro
m
th
e D
is
tri
ct
C
ou
rt
p
ur
su
an
t
to
2
2 U
.S
.C
.
12
91
T
he
n
ot
ic
e o
f
a
pp
ea
l w
as
tim
e
ly
fi
led
pu
rs
ua
nt
to
2
U
.S
.C
.
2
107
and Federal Rules
of
Appellate Procedure Rule 4 a 1 A
on
December
23
2
01
4
fro
m
an
o
rd
er
o
f t
he Di
str
ic
t
C
o
ur
t en
te
re
d
D
ec
em
b
er 23
20
14
.
T
hi
s
ap
p
ea
l
i
s fr
om
a fin
al
or
de
r
th
at
d
is
po
se
d
o
f
a
ll Pl
ai
nti
ff
-A
pp
el
la
nt’
s c
lai
m
s
an
d
t
er
mi
na
te
d th
e
c
as
e
i
n
t
he
D
i
str
ic
t C
o
ur
t
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 15 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 16/78
U
SC
A
C
as
e
14
5
32
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
9
07
Fi
le
d:
01
/2
9/
20
15
P
a
ge
o
f 77
IS
SU
E
S
P
R
ES
E
NT
E
D
Whether
the
District
Court
erred by
construing
Plaintiffs
case and
analyzing
P
lai
nt
iff
s
s
tan
d
ing
in
r
ela
ti
on
to c
la i
m
s
d
if
fe
ren
t f
ro
m t
he a
ct
ua
l
la
ws
ui
t th
at
Pl
ain
ti
ff
br
ou
gh
t p
u
rel
y
as a
po
lic
y di
sp
ut
e.
W
h
et
he
r
th
e
D
i
str
ic
t C
o
ur
t s
ho
ul
d
ha
ve
ru
le
d
th
e E
x
ec
ut
ive
B
ra
nc
h’
s
g
ran
t
o
f a
m
ne
st
y to
a
pp
ro
x
im
at
ely h
al
f
of
al
l ill
eg
al
ali
en
s
pr
es
en
t
in th
e
n
at
ion
as
an
u
nc
on
st
itu
ti
on
al u
su
rp
ati
on
of
leg
is
la
tiv
e a
uth
o
rit
y
fro
m C
o
ng
re
ss
on t
he
m
ot
ion f
or
pr
eli
m
ina
ry
in
ju
nc
tio
n
.
3
W
he
th
er th
e D
is
tr
ict
C
o
ur
t
e
rr
ed
by
n
ot
re
qu
ir
in
g the
pp
el
le
es
to c
om
p
ly
w
it
h t
he
dm
in
is
tra
ti
ve
Pr
oc
ed
ur
es
A
c
t
AP
A
in
gr
an
tin
g be
n
ef i
ts
an
d
amnesty
to
approximately
6
million
illega l
aliens
on
cons ider ing
the
motion
fo
r
p
rel
im
in
ar
y
in
ju
nc
tio
n
.
4
W
he
th
er
th
e
D
is
tri
ct C
o
ur
t er r
ed
in
c
on
si
de
ri
ng
t
he
m
er
its
b
y mi
sc
on
st
ru
ing
w
h
at th
e
P
la
in
tif
f i
s c
h
all
en
gi
ng a
nd
ar
gu
in
g
as
c
ha
lle
ng
in
g on
ly t
he
U
.S
.
G
o
ve
rn
m
en
t’
s
i
nt
er
na
l
p
la
nn
in
g
o
f
i
ts
w
or
k a
nd
pr
io
rit
ies an
d
or
n
ati
on
al
po
li
cy
d
isp
ut
es
.
5 W
h
et
he
r th
e
D
is
tri
ct
Co
ur
t er
red
in c
on
si
de
rin
g th
e
m
er
its
by
c
on
cl
ud
in
g
t
ha
t
Co
ng
re
ss h
a
s en
do
rs
ed
th
e u
se
o
f
“d
ef
er
re
d ac
tio
n”
e
xt
en
din
g
to the
ci
rc
um
st
an
ce
s
at
is
su
e
in t
he D
ef
en
da
nt
s’
p
ro
gr
am
s
he
re
.
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 16 of 78
USCA C #14 5327 D #1536137 Fil d 02/04/2015 P 17 f 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 17/78
USC
A C
as
e
1
4
53
2
5
D
oc
um
e
nt 1
53
49
0
7
Fil
ed
01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e
o
f
6
W
h
et
he
r the
D
i
str
ic
t
o
ur t e
rr
ed
in
co
ns
id
er
ing
t
he
m
er
its b
y
c
on
c
lud
in
g t
ha
t
the
use
of
“deferred
action”
programs
by
the
Executive
ranch
in the
pa st
p
ro
vi
de
s
le
ga
l
au
th
o
ri t
y
or ju
st
ifi
ca
tio
n
fo
r
t
he
c
u
rre
nt d
ef
er
re
d
a
ct
io
n
7
W
he
th
er
t
he
D
is
tr
ict
C
ou
rt
er
red
i
n c
o
ns
ide
ri
ng
th
e m
e
ri
ts
by
co
nc
lu
din
g
th
at
gr
an
tin
g a pr
el
im
in
ar
y inj
un
ct
io
n c
ou
ld n
o
t red
re
ss
t
he
P
la
in
tif
fs
in
ju
ry
8
W
h
eth
er t
he
D
is
tr
ict
o
ur
t er
red
in
an
al
yz
in
g
th
e f
ac
tu
al b
as
es
f
or
P
la
in
tif
fs
sta
nd
in
g b
y d
is
be
lie
vi
ng P
eti
tio
ne
r’
s a
lle
ga
tio
n
s
i
n
t
he
c
om
p
la i
nt
ra
the
r
tha
n
tak
in
g
as
tru
e
al
l a
lle
ga
ti
on
s of fa
ct an
d
a
ll i
nf
ere
n
ce
s
9
W
he
th
er the
D
ist
ric
t
C
ou
rt
er
re
d
i
n a
na
ly
zin
g P
lai
nt
iff
s
s
ta
nd
in
g by
c
on
cl
ud
in
g
th
at
t
he
S
he
rif
fs
of
fic
e s
uf
fer
ed
n
o in
ju
ry
in
fa
c
t
or
int
er
fe
ren
c
e
with
his
official
duties
as Sheriff
1
W
he
th
er
th
e
D
ist
ric
t
o
ur
t
er
re
d i
n an
a
lyz
in
g
th
e f
ac
tua
l
ba
se
s fo
r P
lai
nt
iff
s
s
tan
d
ing
b
y n
ot cr
ed
it
ing Sh
er
iff
rp
aio
’
s al
le
ga
tio
ns of
p
a
st
h
ar
m
as a
n
em
p
iri
ca
l
b
as
is fo
r
pr
ed
ic
tin
g i
nc
re
as
ed o
r n
ew
h
ar
m in
th
e fu
tu
re
11
W
h
e
the
r
th
e
Di
str
ic
t
C
o
ur
t
err
ed
in
an
al
yz
in
g
Pl
ai
nti
ff
s
sta
n
din
g
in te r
m
s o
f
“r
ed
re
ssa
bu
li
ty
”
of
ac
tio
ns by
t
hi
rd
p
art
y a
ct
or
s
by c
on
c
lud
in
g
th
at
P
la
in
tif
fs
in
ju
ry c
ou
ld
no
t be re
dr
es
sed
th
ro
ug
h
f
av
or
ab
le
c
ou
rt a
cti
on
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 17 of 78
USCA Case #14 5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 18 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 18/78
U
SC
A C
a
se
14
5
32
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t 1
5
34
90
7
F
ile
d:
0
1/2
9
/2
01
5
Pa
ge
of
7
7
S
TA
T
U
TE
S A
N
D
CO
N
S
TI
T
UT
IO
N
A
L
P
R
O
VI
S
IO
N
S
Article
III
Section
2
of
the
U S
Constitution “The
judicial Power shall
e
x
ten
d
to a
ll
C
as
es
i
n
L
aw
an
d E
q
ui
ty
a
ris
in
g
un
de
r
th
is
C
o
ns
tit
ut
io
n
th
e
L
aw
s
of th
e
U
n
ite
d
St
ate
s
a
nd
Tr
ea
ti
es
m
ad
e
o
r
w
hi
ch
s
ha
ll b
e
m
a
de
un
de
r
t
he
ir A
u
th
or
ity
...
.
as
m
od
if
ied
by
th
e
E
lev
en
th
Am
e
nd
m
en
t to
th
e
U
S
C
on
st
itu
ti
on
.
2
A
d
mi
ni
str
at
iv
e P
ro
ce
du
re
s
A
ct
5 U
S
C
5
53
et s
eq
3
T
h
e
Im
m
ig
ra
tio
n
an
d
N
atu
ra
li
za
tio
n A
c
t
o
f
19
5
2
as
am
e
nd
ed
8
U
S
C
§
11
01
e
ts
eq
.
ST
A
TE
M
E
N
T
OF
T
H
E
C
AS
E
Nature
of
Case
Jo
se
ph
Ar
pa
io
el
ec
ted
S
h
er
iff
of
M
a
ric
op
a
C
o
un
ty
Ar
iz
on
a,
fi
led
th
is ca
se
s
ee
ki
ng
d
ec
lar
at
ory
j
ud
gm
e
nt
th
at
th
e
Ap
pe
ll
ee
s’
D
e
fe
rre
d A
ct i
on
f
or
C
h
ild
ho
o
d
A
rr
iv
als
D
A
C
A
fr
om
Ju
ne
1
5 2
0
12
an
d
ne
w
N
ov
em
b
er
2
0
20
1
4
am
ne
st
y
pr
og
ra
m
s
ar
e
u
nc
on
st
itu
tio
n
al
ab
us
es
of
th
e
P
re
sid
en
t’
s
r
ol
e in
o
ur
na
ti
on
’s
C
on
st
itu
tio
n
al
arc
h
ite
ctu
re
an
d
ex
ce
ed
th
e p
o
we
rs
of t
he
U
S
P
re
sid
en
t
w
it
hin th
e
U
S
Co
n
sti
tu
tio
n.
Ap
p
ell
an
t
a
ls
o c
ha
lle
ng
e
d
t
he
se p
ro
gr
am
s
a
s
u
lt
ra
v
ire
s
a
cti
on
s
i
n
vi
ol
ati
on
o
f t
he
A
dm
in
is
tra
ti
ve P
ro
ce
du
re
s
A
c
t
5
U
S
C
70
2
t
hr
ou
gh
70
6
bo
th
f
or f
ai l
ur
e
t
o f
ol
lo
w
th
e
p
ro
ce
du
re
s
of
th
e A
P
A
a
nd
as
un
la
w
ful
a
nd i
nv
al
id
4
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 18 of 78
USCA Case #14 5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 19 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 19/78
US
CA
C
ase
14 5
325
D
ocu
men
t
153
4907
F
iled
: 0
1129
/201
5
Page
o
f
77
for
b
eing
ar
bi tra
ry ,
cap
ric io
us , a
n
ab
use
o
f di
scre
tion
u
nrea
sona
ble
a
nd/o
r
o
ther
wise
not
in
accordance with
law, by
conflicting
with
authorizing
statu tes.
App
ella
nt
also
ch
allen
ged
the
prog
rams
as
v
iola
ting
this
Cir
cuit’
s
reco
gnit
ion
of
the
“Non
-De
lega
tion
Do
ctrin
e”
un
der
A
mer
ican
Truc
king
A
sso
ciati
ons
Inc
.
US
.
Env
ironm
ent
al P
rotec
tion
Ag
ency
, 175
F.3
d
1
027 D
.C .
Ci
r.
1999
, mo
difi
ed
on
r
eh
’g b
y
195 F
.3d
4 D
.C .
Cir
.
1999
,
m
od
ified
by
M
ichig
an
EP
A
2
13 F
.3d
663
D .C
.
C
ir.
200
0 ,
mo
difie
d
by
W
hit
man
A
dmin
istra
tor
of
E
nviro
nme
ntal
Pro
tecti
on
Ag
ency
et a
.
Am
erica
n
T
ruck
ing
As
soci
ation
s
In
c. ,
et.
al .
,
53
1
U.S
.
457
484
-86
121
S.
Ct.
903
f
eb
ru
ar
y
27
, 200
1
a
ppe
als
l
eavin
g
the
po
int
unc
han
ged
add
ress
ing
oth
er de f
icien
cies
.
Course
of
Proceedings
N
o ev
ident
iary
hea
ring
de
cis io
n,
or
pres
entat
ion
o
f
f
acts
took
plac
e.
T
he
cas
e was
de
cide
d on
th
e pl
ea din
gs .
T
he
c
ase
wa
s d
ismi
ssed
prio
r
to
a
ny
dis
cove
ry .
Acc
ordi
ngly
th
e
cas
e is
pr
esen
ted
in the
Co
ur t
of
A
ppea
ls
o
n t
he
pl
eadin
gs
alon
e.
P
lain
tiff-A
ppe
llant
fi
led
h
is
Co
mpla
int
on N
ovem
ber
20 , 20
14 .
O
n
De
cem
ber
4
,
2
014
,
Pl
ainti
ff-A
ppel
lant
file
d
a
M
otion
fo
r
P
relim
ina
ry
Inju
nctio
n to
sta
y im
plem
ent
ation
and
f
urthe
r
imp
lem
enta
tion
o
f th
e
e
fe
nd
an
ts
Ap
pelle
es ’
ch
allen
ged
p
rogr
am s.
JA
61
-99
O
n
De
cemb
er
1
6 20
14 ,
th
e
D
istric
t
Co
urt
in
quire
d
wh
ethe
r
the
D
efen
dant
s-
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 19 of 78
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 20 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 20/78
US
CA
as
e
14 5
325
Do
cum
ent
153
490
7
flIed
: 01
/29/2
015
a
ge
of 77
A
p
pe
lle
es e
le
cte
d to tre
a
t
p
ar
t o
f
th
eir
o
pp
os
iti
on to
th
e M
o
tio
n fo
r P
re
lim
i
na
ry
Injunction
as
a
Federal
Rules
of
Civ il
Procedure Rule
l2 b l
Motion
to
Dismiss
fo
r lac
k
of
su
bj
ec
t
ma
tt
er
jur
is
dic
ti
on
ba
se
d u
po
n st
an
din
g
.
O
n De
c
em
be
r
5
2
01
4, t
he
D
efe
n
da
nt
s-A
p
pe
lle
es
fil
ed
th
eir O
pp
os
iti
on
to
th
e
M
o
tio
n fo
r
Pr
el
im
in
ar
y
I
nju
n
cti
on i
nc
or
po
ra
tin
g
a
F
R
CP R
u
le l2
b
l M
o
tio
n
to
Di
sm
is
s
fo
r
l
ac
k o
f
st
an
di
ng
,
p
ur
su
an
t t
o th
e
co
ur
t’s
i
nv
it
ati
on
. J
A
2
25
-2
80
O
n D
ec
em
b
er
17,
2
01
4
, P
lai
nt
iff
-A
pp
e
lla
nt
r
eq
u
est
ed l
ea
ve t
o p
re
se
nt liv
e
tes
ti
mo
n
y
in
t
he he
ar
in
g to p
re
se
nt fa
ct
s in
s
up
po
rt
of
s
tan
di
ng p
ur
su
an
t t
o
R
u
le
65
1
d of
the
L
o
ca
l Ru
le
s of t
he
Di
str
ic
t
C
ou
rt
D
kt
18
T
h
e Di
str
ic
t
C
o
ur
t
de
ni
ed
th
e
m
o
tio
n
bu
t
g
ra
nt
ed l
ea
ve
f
or
th
e
Pl
ai
nti
ff
-A
pp
el
la
nt
to fi
le a
supplemental affidavit
instead
O
n
D
ec
em
b
er 18
, 20
1
4,
t
he
P
la
in
tif
f-A
p
pe
lla
n
t
f
ile
d a R
ep
ly
to t
he
F
R
C
P
Ru
le 1
2
b
l
M
ot
io
n to
D
ism
i
ss
a
nd
p
re
sen
ti
ng
o
th
er
cl
ar
ifi
ca
tio
n.
J
A 5
4 1
-57
7 .
Di
sp
os
iti
on B
e
low
T
he
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
ur
t
he
ld
a
h
ea
ri
ng o
n
D
e
ce
m
be
r
22, 2
0
14
,
o
n the
Pl
ai
nti
ff
A
p
pe
ll
an
t’s M
o
ti
on fo
r
P
rel
im
in
ar
y Inj
un
ct
io
n
an
d th
e D
e
fe
nd
an
ts
-A
pp
e
lle
es
M
oti
on t
o
D
ism
i
ss
u
n
de
r F
R
C
P
R
ul
e
1
2
b
1
f
or
la
ck
of
s
tan
d
ing
.
T
he
D
is
tri
ct
Co
ur
t
i
ss
ue
d
a
M
e
m
ora
n
du
m
O
pi
nio
n
an
d
O
r
de
r
d
ism
i
ssi
ng
A
p
pe
ll
an
t’s ca
se
for l
ac
k o
f st
an
di
ng
o
n
D
ec
em
b
er
23 2
01
4.
JA
76
5-
79
9
USCA Case #14 5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 20 of 78
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 21 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 21/78
U
SC
C
as
e 1
4-
53
25
D
oc
um
e
nt
15
3
49
07
Ued
01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e
2
0 o
f
S
T
AT
E
M
EN
T O
F F
A
C
TS
I.
The
Plaintiff
Sh
er
iff A
r
pa
io is th
e
e
lec
te
d S
he
rif
f
of
M
ari
co
pa C
ou
n
ty A
ri
zo
na
o
ne
o
f
th
e
l
ar
ge
st
S
he
rif
fs
o
ffi
ce
s i
n
th
e
U
ni
ted S
ta
te
s M
ari
co
pa
C
ou
nt
y
is
th
e
m
os
t
p
op
ul
at
ed C
o
un
ty in t
he S
ta
te
of Ar
iz
on
a w
it
h
4 0
0
9 4
12 c
itiz
en
s.
’ T
he
C
o
un
ty
h
ol
ds
m
o
re
th
an
si
xty p
er
ce
nt
60
)
of
a
ll
o
f
t
he
p
op
u
lat
io
n
o
f th
e en
ti
re S
ta
te
of
A
r
iz
on
a.
Sh
er
iff A
r
pa
io
s
o
ff
ic
e
e
ff
ec
tiv
el
y i
s n
ea
rly
all
of th
e
S
ta
te o
f A
ri
zo
na in
t
er
ms o
f
la
w e
nf
or
ce
m
en
t.
M
ari
co
pa
Co
u
nty
is t
he
fo
u
rth
m
os
t po
pu
la
te
d C
o
un
ty
i
n t
he U
n
ite
d St
ate
s
b
y
m
os
t
re
po
rts
.
If
M
ar
ico
p
a C
ou
n
ty
b
y its
el
f
w
e
re
St
at
e t
he
C
o
un
ty w
o
ul
d
be
la
rg
er by po
pu
la
tio
n t
ha
n
tw
e
nt
y-
fo
ur
2
4)
2
of th
e S
ta
te
s w
i
th
in
the United
States
of
America
and
larger than Puerto
Rico and
more than
five
times
la
rg
er
th
an the
en
tir
e D
is
tri
ct
of C
olu
m
b
ia.
II
.
D
ef
en
da
nt
s’ Ne
w
P
ro
gr
am
s
O
n
Ju
ne
5
20
1
2 on P
re
sid
e
nt
O
ba
m
a’
s
o
rd
er
s S
ec
ret
ar
y of
H
om
e
lan
d
Se
cu
ri
ty J
an
e
t N
ap
ol
ita
no c
re
at
ed
ne
w “
de
fer
re
d
a
ct
io
n”
p
ro
gr
am
c
al
led D
A
CA
.
IA 10
0
-1
03
) A
p
pe
lla
nt
s us
e
“
de
fe
rr
ed
ac
tio
n”
to
me
an
th
e E
xe
cu
tiv
e B
ra
nc
h on
“
S
tat
e
C
o
un
ty Q
ui
ck
Fa
ct
s ” M
ar
ic
op
a
C
ou
nt
y
A
ri
zo
na
U
S C
en
su
s
B
ur
ea
u h
ttp
://
qu
ic
kf
ac
ts.
ce
ns
us
.g
ov
/q
fd
lst
ate
s/
04
/0
40
3
ht
m
l
“
Sta
te P
op
ul
at
ion
by
R
a
nk
2
01
3
” In
foP
le
as
e
h
ttp
:/
/w
ww
.
inf
op
le
as
e.
co
m
lus
/s
tat
es
/p
op
ul
ati
on
-b
y-
ra
nk
.h
tm
l
g
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 22 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 22/78
USC
A
a
se
14
532
5
D
ocu
men
t
153
490
7
Fi
led:
01
/29/2
015
ag
e
21
o
f
77
its
ow
n a
ut
ho
ri
ty a
n
d in
it
s
o
w
n
d
isc
re
ti
on de
cl
in
es
to
en
fo
rc
e
la
w
s en
a
cte
d
b
y
Congres s
on
immigration.
But
“deferred
action”
arose
as a
temporary deferment
d
u
rin
g th
e
ti
m
e f
ro
m
th
e
ex
pir
at
io
n
o
f o
ne law
f
ul
sta
tu
s
w
hi
le
a
pr
op
er
ap
pl
ica
ti
on
is
p
en
d
ing f
or a
no
th
er la
w
fu
l st
at
us
or
as a
n
ac
co
m
m
od
at
ion in
he
re
nt
ly ne
ce
ss
ar
y
t
o
c
ar r
yi
ng ou
t
a
C
on
g
res
si
on
al en
ac
tm
e
nt
B
y
t
he
ir 20
12
an
d
2
01
4
p
ro
gr
am
s
, A
pp
e
lla
nt
s
no
w
v
as
tly
ex
p
an
d “
d
efe
rr
ed
a
ct
io
n” in
bo
th n
at
ur
e a
n
d b
rea
d
th t
o gr
an
t a
m
ne
st
y
to
a
pp
ro
xi
m
ate
ly
6 mi
lli
on
of
t
he
e
sti
m
ate
d
to
ta
l
of
3
mi
lli
on d
ep
o
rta
bl
e il
leg
al a
lie
n
s
53
o
f
all
pe
rs
on
s
C
on
g
re
ss
co
m
ma
nd
e
d
t
o
b
e de
po
rte
d
), w
hi
le
i
n co
nf
lic
t
wi
th t
he
in
ten
t
o
f
C
on
g
res
s’
e
na
ct
m
en
ts an
d wi
ll
A
lso
A
pp
el
la
nt
s
no
w
tr
an
sf
or
m de
fe
rre
d ac
ti
on
in to
a
vas t benef its
program
and
a
guarantee
of
immunity from
deportation
and
pr
os
ec
ut
ion
in r
ea
lit
y
i
f n
o
t
i
n r
he
to
ric
, ve
ry
d
iff
er
en
t
fr
om
p
as
t d
efe
rr
ed
a
ct
io
n
O
n No
v
em
b
er 2
20
14
o
n P
res
id
en
t
Ob
a
ma
’s
ord
e
rs
su
cc
es
so
r Se
cr
et
ar
y
A
n
e
sti
ma
te
d
m
i
lli
on fro
m
th
e 20
1
2 DA
C
A a
nd
mi
lli
on
f
ro
m th
e n
ew
20
14 pr
og
ra
m
s.
It should
be remembered
that in
the INA Congress
has
provided numerous
a
lte
rn
at
ive g
rou
n
ds fo
r r
el
ief
fo
r ali
en
s
in sp
ec
ifi
c
c
ir
cu
m
sta
nc
es
.
S
om
e o
f
tho
se
ex
p
lic
itl
y
ve
st in
t
he
D
H
S fac
t
fm
d
ing d
ut
ie
s a
nd p
ow
e
rs an
d/
or
di
sc
ret
io
n bu
t
o
nl
y if D
H
S a
cts
w
i
thi
n
the bo
un
d
s of
ea
ch
C
o
ng
re
ss
ion
al
p
re
sc
rip
ti
on
. He
re
A
p
pe
lla
nt a
dd
re
ss
es as “
ill
eg
al
a
lie
ns
”
o
nly
t
ho
se
w
ho
do
qu
al
ify
fo
r
b
a
sis
f
or l
aw
fu
l p
re
se
nc
e in
th
e
c
ou
nt
ry
B
y d
ef
in
iti
on
, in
Ap
p
ell
an
t’
s u
nd
e
r s
ta
nd
in
g
a
fo
rei
gn
er w
h
o q
ua
lif
ies
f
or
so
m
e
la
w
fu
l p
re
se
nc
e e
xp
lic
itl
y
g
ra
nt
ed
by
C
on
g
res
si
on
al
e
na
ct
m
en
t
in
th
e
N
A is
i
nc
lu
de
d am
o
ng t
he c
ate
go
ry o
f
il l
eg
al
a
lie
ns be
in
g
ad
dr
es
se
d
he
re
g
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 23 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 23/78
US
C
A
C
a
se
14
5
32
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t 1
53
4
90
7
Fi
led
:
0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
ag
e 2
2
of
7
7
o
f
H
o
me
la
nd
Se
cu
ri
ty
Je
h
J
oh
ns
on c
re
at
ed
a
n
um
b
er o
f s
im
il
ar
n
ew
a
m
ne
sty
o
r
deferred
action
programs through
several
Memoranda
as
well
as
simultaneously
i
ss
uin
g o
th
er
re
la
te
d
M
em
o
ran
d
a
s
uc
h
a
s
es
tab
li
sh
ing
pr
io
rit
ies fo
r
e
nf
or
ce
m
en
t
o
f
hi
gh
-p
rio
ri
ty
d
ep
or
ta
tio
ns
I
A 1
54
-1
59
w
hi
ch
p
no
rit
iz
ati
on
is
be
in
g
c
ha
lle
ng
e
d
h
ere
.
T
h
e
20
14
d
e
fe r
re
d
a
ct
ion
p
ro
gr
am
s be
in
g ch
al
le
ng
ed h
er
e
ar
e:
F
ir
st
e
xp
an
di
ng
DA
C
A
by
c
ha
ng
in
g e
lig
ib
ili
ty da
te
s
to
in
cl
ud
e m
o
re
rec
en
t
a
rri
va
ls
an
d ex
te
nd
in
g
D
A
C
A
to
pa
re
nts
o
f U
.S. c
it
ize
ns
an
d
le
g
al
im
m
ig
ra
nt
s.
IA
1
4
4-1
4
9 W
h
en
A
p
pe
lla
n
t
O
b
am
a
cr
ea
ted
DA
C
A
in 2
01
2
h
e as
su
re
d
th
e
c
ou
n
try
th
at
th
e
lu
re
o
f m
or
e
im
m
ig
ra
tio
n
w
o
ul
d
be
mi
ni
m
al
b
ec
au
se
on
ly
ch
ild
ho
o
d a
rr
iv
als w
ho
e
nte
re
d
the co
un
tr
y
be
fo
re J
u
ne 2
00
7
w
ou
ld
be
eli
gi
bl
e.
Largely non-English-speaking
foreigner s
of
limited
educat ion
would surely
u
nd
er
st
an
d
t
he
nu
an
c
es o
f
D
A
CA
a
s a U
.S
.
go
ve
rn
m
en
t pr
og
ra
m
an
d
re
al i
ze
t
he
y
do
n’
t qu
al
ify
.
C
ri
tic
s
r
esp
o
nd
ed
th
at
fo
rei
gn
er
s w
ou
ld
be
sh
re
w
d
en
ou
gh
to r
ea
liz
e
th
at
gr
an
ti
ng
a
mn
es
ty no
w
w
o
uld
m
a
ke
fu
tu
re
ro
un
ds o
f
a
m
ne
sty hi
gh
ly
li
ke
ly .
T
h
en
o
n N
ov
e
mb
er 20
2
01
4
th
e
De
fe
nd
a
nts
ch
an
ge
d
t
he
d
at
e t
o
i
nc
lud
e
m
or
e-
r
ec
en
t c
hi
ld
ho
od
ar
riv
al
s e
nte
ri
ng
o
n or
be
fo
re
Ja
n
ua
ry
20
10
a
nd r
ela
x
th
e ag
e
li
mi
ta
tio
ns
.
As
a
res
ul
t
ne
w
flo
o
ds
of
m
i
lli
on
s o
f
i
lle
ga
l
al
ie
ns
wi
ll u
nd
er
sta
nd
th
at A
p
pe
lle
es
ke
ep
ch
an
g
ing
th
e da
te
a
nd
ne
w r
ec
en
t a
rri
va
ls w
i
ll p
ro
ba
bl
y a
ls
o
r
ec
ei
ve a
m
ne
sty
if
th
ey
ca
n
j
us
t
p
la
nt “d
ry
fe
et
”
o
n U
.S. so
il a
nd
w
ait l
on
g
e
n
ou
gh
.
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 24/78
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 25 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 25/78
USC
A C
ase
14 5
325
D
ocu
men
t 15
349
07
Pile
d:
01
129/
2015
P
age
2
4 of 7
7
Alth
oug
h v
otin
g
is no
t
auth
orize
d
b
y
law
,
an
off
icial
invit
ation
an
d
opportunity
to
register to vote under the companion “Motor
Voter”
la
w.
S
ee
42
U S
C
19
73c,
“The
N
atio
nal
V
oter
Regi
strat
ion
Ac
t”
The
am
nes
ty do cu
men
ts
wi
ll
n
ot
re
vea l
o
ne ’s citiz
en sh
ip
s
tatus
.
Th
erefo
re, whi
le c
laim
ing
they
d
o
no
t h
ave
th
e resou
rces
to
ob
ey th
e
C
ong
ress
iona
l co
mma
nd to
de
port
app
roxim
ate
ly
11
3 mi
llion
cit
izens
of
o
the r
co u
ntrie
s
App
ellee
s’
in
stea
d
wan
t
to
pro
cess
prep
are
an
d
to
app
rox
imat
ely
6
mi
llion
il
lega l
al ie
ns a
cer
tific
ate
assu
ring
tho
se
6
m
illio
n
p
eop
le
tha
t
t
he y
are
i
mmu
ne
fr
om depo
rtati
on o
r
p
rose
cutio
n
T
o
do this
,
they w
ill ha ve
to
co n
du c
t
6
mill
ion
crim
ina
l
and
ris
k as
sess
ment
back
grou
nd
chec
ks . Fu rt
herm
ore
th
is
workload
will
need
to
be
repeated
every
three
years,
because
sta tus
is
subject
to
ren
ewa
l
in
th
ree yea
rs.
A
nd De
fend
an ts
just
ify al
l th
is mas
sive
u
nder
takin
g
on th
e
bas
is th
at
they
do
no
t
hav
e
en
ou gh re
sour
ce s
to
do w
hat th
e law
c
om m
an d
s
i
ns tea
d.
STA
ND
ARD
RE
VIEW
A
cou r
t
of ap p
ea ls
rev
iews
d
e
nov
o m
atter
s
of
la
w incl
ud in
g
a
di
stric
t
co
urt’s
d
ismi
ssal for
lack
of
stand
ing
A m
F
ed’n
Go
v’t
E
mps
., AF
L—C
IO
L
oca
l 4
46
Ni
chol
son 475
F 3d
341,
3
47
D.C
.
Cir.
2
007
.
Mor
eove
r
“W
e
re
view
a di
stric
t
c
ou rt de c
isio
n
r
egar
ding
a prel
imin
ary
inj
unct
ion
f
or a
buse
of
d
iscr
etion
an
d
any
11
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 26 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 26/78
USCA
a
se
14 5325 Document
1534907
Filed:
01/29/2015
ag
e
25 of
77
und
erly
ing lega
l
co nc
lusio
ns
de novo.”
City Fed.
Fin
. Corp.
Office of
Thr
fl
Supervis ion
5
f.3d
738, 746 D.C.
Cir.
1995 .
The U.S.
Sup
rem
e
Co
urt
h
as h
eld that “the
que
stio
n
of s
tand
ing
is wh
ethe
r
the li t
igan
t
is
en
title
d
to h
ave
the
cour
t
dec
ide
th
e mer
its
o
f the
disp
ute
or
of
part
icula
r
issues.”
Warth Se
ldin,
4
22
U.S.
490
, 498 19
75
. The c
ourt
’s
“g
ene
ral
po
wer to a
djud
icate
in
spec
ific areas
of sub
stan
tive law
is
pro
perl
y
rais
ed
b
y a
l2 b
l mo
tion,
”
Pa
lmer Un
ited Sta
tes, 16
F 3
d
1310,
1313 fe
d.
Cfr. 1999 ,
and th
e bu
rde
n
of
est
ablis
hing
the
court’s
su
bjec
t
ma
tter juris
dict
ion
res
ides wi
th
t
he
party seek
ing
to
inv
oke it
See
M
cNu
tt
Gen.
M
oto
rs
A
cce
ptan
ce
Corp.
ofl
nd., 29 U.S.
178 189 1936 .
In
general, the
Appellant
will
have “standing”
to
bring these
claim s
if
only
on
e
o
f
nu
mer
ous poss
ible
g
roun
ds
ap
plie
s.
All
poten
tial
g
roun
ds f
or
sta
nd in
g
wou
ld
h
ave
to
be
el
imin
ated one
by
one fo r a
cou
rt to di
sm is
s the case
unde
r
Rul
e
2 b
l .
The
D
istric
t
Co
ur t
c
ould
hav
e
u
phe
ld
s
tand
ing un
der
se
ve ra
l
d
iffe
rent
th
eori
es
bas
ed
on
var i
ou s dif
fere
nt
ty
pe s
and
e
xam
ples
o
f
in jur
ies.
Whe
n
con
side
ring w
heth
er
to
dism
iss an
actio
n
fo
r lack o
f sub
ject m
atte
r
jur
isdic
tion s
tand
ing ,
the
cou
rt
is
“
ob li
gated
to ass
um e
all
factu
al
all
eg at i
on s
to be
tr
ue and
to dr
aw
all reas
onab
le
inf
erenc
es
in
pl
ainti
ffs
favor.”
Henk
e
v
Un
ited
Stat
es ,
60
F
.3d
795,
797 fed.
Cir. 1995 . On
a
m
otion to d
ism i
ss unde
r
Rul
e
12
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 27 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 27/78
USCA
Case 14-5325 Document
1534907
Piled: 01/29/2015
Page 26
of
77
12 b) l), a
f ederal court
must
accept as
true
all
material factual allegations
contained
in
the
complaint
and
“construe
the complaint liberally, granting
plaintiff
the
benefit of
al l
inferences that can
be derived from
the acts
alleged’ and
upon
such facts
determine jurisdictional
questions.” Am.
Nat
Ins. Co. v
fDIC,
642
F.3d 1137, 1139 (D.C. Cir . 2011 quoting Thomas v. Principi,
394
F.3d
970, 972
D.C. Cir.
2005) quoting
Barr v Clinton,
370
F.3d
1196, 1199 (D.C.
Cir.
2004))).
The relevant issue presented
by
a
motion
to dismiss
under
FRCP
Rule
l2 b) l)
challenging standing “is not whether
a plaintiff
will
ultimately prevail but
whether
the claimant
is
entitled to offer
evidence to support the claims.” Patton v
United States,
64
Fed. Cl. 768,
773
2005 quoting Scheuer
v Rhodes,
416
U.S.
232, 236 1974),
abrogated
on
other grounds
by
Harlow
v
Fitzgerald,
457
U.S.
800
1982)).
In considering the issue
of standing, this court must
presume all
factual allegations
to
be
true and
construe
al l
reasonable
inferences
in
favor of the
plaintiff.
Scheuer,
416
U.S.
at 236; Reynolds
v
Army
Air Force
Exch.
Serv.,
846
F.2d 746,
747 Fed. Cir. 198 ).
Moreover,
in
evaluating subject matter jurisdiction,
the
court,
when
necessary,
may “undertake
an
independent investigation
to assure
itself
of its own
subject matter
jurisdiction,”
Settles
v
US.
Parole
Comm ‘n
429
F.3d 1098, 1107-
1108
(D.C.
Cir.
2005) quoting
Haase
v
Sessions, 835
F.2d
902,
908 (D .C . Cir.
13
USCA
a
se 14 5325
Document
1534907
Filed:
01/29/2015
a
ge
27 of
77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 28 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 28/78
1987 ,
and co
ns id
er facts
d
evelo
ped in the
reco
rd
be
yond t
he
com
plain
t
Id
S
ee
also
He
rbert N
atio
nalA
cad
emy
o
f
Sc
ienc
es,
974
F 2
d
192 197
D.C.
Cir.
1992
in
di
spos
ing
o
f
mo
tion to di
sm is
s for lac
k of su
bject
ma
tter
ju
risd
ictio
n
“w
he re
nec
essa
ry
the
co
urt m
ay co
nsid
er
th
e
c
omp
lain
t
supp
lem
ente
d
b
y
u
ndisp
uted
f
acts
e
vide
nced in
the
r
ecord
,
or th
e com
plain
t
supp
lem
ente
d
by
u
ndis
pute
d
facts
p
lus
th
e
court’s r
esol
ution o
f d
ispu
ted facts
.” ; A
llian
ce for Dem
ocra
cy
F
EC, 362
F
Supp.
d 138
142 D.D.C.
2
005
.
H
ere
,
the D
istr
ic t
Co
ur t de
cl in
ed
the
Ap
pella
nt’s
re
ques
t
for live
testi
mon
y
to
d
evelo
p the
r
ecor
d
fu
rther
.
T
he
bur
den
of
est
ablis
hing
a
ny ju
risd
ictio
nal
facts
to s
up po
rt
the
ex
ercis
e of
the s
ubje
ct matt
er
juri
sdic
tion
r
es ts on
the pl
ainti
ff
See
He
rtz
Corp
Frie
nd, 9
U.
s.
77
9
97 201
0 ; Thomson
Ga
skill,
315
U.S.
44
2,
44
6
1942 ; Moms
Ag
ainst
M
ercu
iy
FDA,
483
f 3
d
824,
828
D .C
. Cir.
2007
.
SU
MM
AR
Y OF A
RG
UM
ENT
Re
spec
tfully
t
his
C
ou rt
m
ust reve
rse
the
de ci
sion
of
the Dist
rict Co
ur t
w
hich dem
ed
a
moti
on for
preli
mina
ry
injun
ctio
n
and
gr
an ted
the A
ppe
llees
’
mo
tion
to
d
ism i
ss
f
or
lack of juris
dict
ion
as
l
ack
o
f
s
tand
ing pu
rsua
nt
to
FR
CP
Rule 12 b 1 .
A
ppe
llan
t
asks
t
his
Co
ur t
to
o
rder
a
p
reli
mina
ry
in
junc
tion
d
irec
tly.
Thro
ugh
out
t
he Dis
trict C
ourt
’s
op i
nion
,
JA
765 -
799
,
J
udge How
ell
stron
gly ap
pea
rs
to
ha
ve
bee
n in
fluen
ced mor
e
b
y
the p
oliti
cs
of t
he to
pic
than
by
14
U
S
CA
C
as
e
14
5
32
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t 1
5
34
90
7
il
ed
01
/2
9/
20
15
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 29 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 29/78
P
ag
e 2
8 of
7
7
the
l
eg
al
a
na
lys
is
.
F
o
r e
xa
m
ple
J
ud
ge
H
o
w
ell c
on
clu
d
ed
th
at
the
l
iti
ga
tio
n w
as
on
ly a
d
is
pu
te o
ve
r n
at
io
na
l p
oli
ci
es an
d
re
p
ea
tedly analyzed
the
case
in terms
of
n
ati
on
al
p
ol
ici
es r
ath
er
tha
n th
e
g
o
ve
rn
ing
s
ta
tu
tes
U
.S
. C
o
ns
titu
ti
on
an
d
le
ga
l
r
eq
ui
rem
e
nt
s. J
ud
ge
H
o
w
ell
a
na
ly
ze
d t
he
iss
ue
s
as on
ly
a d
is
pu
te
b
et
we
en
th
e
p
o
lit
ica
l
br
an
ch
es a
n
d Sh
e
rif
f
A
rpa
io
se
ek
in
g
to in
te
rv
en
e
i
n th
a
t na
tio
n
al
p
o
lic
y
“c
on
ve
rs
at
ion
.”
As
a
res
ul
t of
t
he
o
pi
ni
on
’s
f
ixa
ti
on o
n
n
ati
on
al po
li
cie
s
Ju
dg
e
Ho
w
el
l co
nc
lu
de
d
t
ha
t t
he ca
se
i
s n
ot
a
ju
sti
cia
b
le
c
as
e w
hi
ch th
e
D
is
tr
ict
Co
ur
t
co
uld
a
dj
ud
ic
at
e, bu
t a
di
sp
ut
e be
tw
ee
n
th
e
C
o
ng
re
ss an
d
W
h
ite
Ho
u
se
.
H
ow
ev
e
r
the
ca
se
d
oe
s p
res
en
t j
us
tic
ia
bl
e is
su
es
.
Th
e
D
is
tri
ct
Co
ur
t s
ho
ul
d
h
av
e ap
p
lie
d
t
he
U
.S
.
C
on
sti
tu
tio
n
a
nd
/o
r
th
e
A
dm
in
is
tra
ti
ve
Pr
oc
ed
ur
es A
c
t
“A
P
A”
,
to t
he
p
ro
gr
am
s
as
is
a
typical exercise for
the
Judiciary.
Congress
has
p
ro
vi
de
d f
or
ju
di
ci
al
re
vie
w
in
t
he
A
P
A
.
T
he
P
res
id
en
t’
s
ac
tio
ns ar
e
u
nc
o
ns
tit
uti
on
al
. Ap
p
ell
ee
s’
a
n
no
un
ce
d
t
he
leg
al
gr
ou
nd
s
for
th
ei
r p
ro
gr
am
s
as
t
he
ir
cla
im
to
ha
ve
in
he
re
nt
l
eg
is
lat
iv
e
au
tho
ri
ty
to
dis
re
ga
rd w
ho
le
sa
le t
he
la
w
s
pa
ss
ed
b
y
Co
n
gr
es
s. T
he
O
f
fic
e of
L
eg
al
Co
u
ns
el
m
ad
e
e
xp
li
cit
ly
cle
a
r
i
n
it
s le
ga
l
op
in
io
n J
A 1
05
-1
3
7
th
at t
he
E
xe
cu
ti
ve
B
ra
nc
h
do
es
no
t h
av
e
t
he
a
uth
o
rit
y t
o d
is
re
ga
rd
o
r re
wr
ite t
he
la
w
s. Y
et
t
ha
t i
s
e
xa
ct
ly
w
h
at A
pp
el
le
es’
h
av
e
do
ne
.
A
p
pe
lla
n
t
ch
al
le
ng
es t
he
co
n
sti
tu
tio
na
lit
y
an
d
/or
le
ga
l v
al
id
ity
of b
ot
h t
he
U
SC
A
C
as
e
1
4
5 3
2
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
9
07
Fi
led
: 01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e 2
9 o
f
77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 30 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 30/78
A
p
pe
lle
es
’
Ju
ne
5
20
12
D
A
CA
p
ro
gr
am
as we
ll
a
s A
p
pe
lla
nt
’s b
at
te
ry
ofm
o
re-
re
ce
nt
de
fe
rr
ed
ac
ti
on
pr
og
ra
m
s
o
rd
ere
d
on
N
ovember
20 2014 . JA 100-149
3
2
3
35
6
A
pp
el
lan
t
ch
a
lle
ng
es
th
os
e
p
ro
gr
am
s
gr
an
tin
g
a
mn
e
sty
as
un
co
ns
tit
ut
io
na
l
ab
us
es o
f
a
uth
o
rit
y
a
nd
/o
r
as vi
ol
ati
ng
t
he
A
PA
.
A
l
tho
u
gh t
he
A
p
pe
lle
es
’
p
ort
ra
y
th
eir
pro
g
ra
ms
as
m
e
re
ly in
te
rn
all
y
o
rg
an
iz
in
g th
ei
r
w
o
rk
th
at
i
s
n
o
t w
ha
t
t
he
p
ro
gr
am
s
ac
tu
all
y d
o
. Ap
p
ell
ee
s’
leg
al
ly
ju
st
ify
w
ha
t th
ey
ar
e n
ot d
oin
g
bu
t of
fer
no d
ef
en
se
t
o
w
h
at th
ey
ar
e
a
ctu
al
ly do
in
g.
A
pp
e
lle
es
cla
im
di
sc
ret
io
n
to or
ga
niz
e
th
eir
w
or
k in
te
rn
al
ly
s
uc
h
a
s
d
e
cid
in
g w
h
er
e
b
es
t
to
fo
c
us
re
so
ur
ce
s.
B
u
t
S
he
ri
ffA
rp
aio
is co
nt
es
tin
g
th
e
cr
ea
tio
n
of r
eg
ul
at
ory
pr
og
ra
m
s th
at g
ra
nt
a
m
ne
st
y a
nd c
on
fe
r a
ff
in
na
tiv
e be
ne
fi
ts .
T
o
ill
us
tra
te
c
ur
rent
law
commands
that
if
government
at
any
level
en
co
u
nte
rs
a de
po
rt
ab
le
il
leg
a
l
a
lie
n
A
pp
el
lee
s’ mu
st
de
po
rt
th
e
m
w
h
eth
er
o
r n
o
t
A
p
pe
ll
an
ts w
ou
ld ha
ve
s
ou
gh
t
th
em
ou
t.
F
or e
xa
m
ple
, i
f S
he
rif
f A
rp
ai
o’
s
o
ffi
ce
ha
nd
s an il l
eg
al a
li
en
ov
er
to t
he
U
.S
.
D
e
pa
rtm
e
nt
o
f
Ho
m
el
an
d
S
ec
ur
ity
“D
H
S
”
,
DH
S
is c
om
m
an
d
ed b
y C
on
g
res
s
t
o
d
ep
or
t
th
em
, w
h
et
he
r
a h
ig
h p
ri
or
ity
o
r lo
w
p
rio
ri
ty
en
fo
rc
em
e
nt t
arg
e
t, j
us
t
b
ec
au
se
the
y
w
er
e
a
pp
re
he
nd
ed
r
eg
ar
dl
es
s of
p
ri
or
ity
.
Bu
t
un
de
r A
pp
el
lee
s’
n
ew
pr
og
ra
ms
, a
m
ne
st
y
be
ne
fic
ia
rie
s
c
arr
y
im
m
u
ni
ty
f
rom
d
ep
o
rta
tio
n
.
T
h
ere
fo
re
,
w
ha
t
C
o
ng
re
ss c
om
m
a
nd
s, A
p
pe
lle
es
w
ill
n
ot
d
o. T
he
y w
ill
u
se t
he
ir n
ew
d
ef
er
red
a
ct
io
n
pr
og
ra
ms
a
s rea
so
n
s fo
r
no
t
U
S
CA
C
ase
1
4
53
2
5
D
oc
um
e
nt
15
34
9
07
i
le
d
01
/2
9/
20
15
Pa
ge
3
0 o
f
7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 31 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 31/78
en
fo
rci
ng
c
ur
ren
t g
o
ve
rn
in
g l
aw
.
H
ow
e
ve
r
th
is
c
as
e w
as
di
sm
is
se
d
on
th
e
ba
si
s
o
f
standing.
Th
e
D
is
tr
ict C
o
ur
t
an
aly
z
ed
th
e ca
se
fo
r
st
an
di
ng
a
s
o
n
ly
a
n
a
bs
tr
ac
t p
oli
cy
di
sp
ut
e
b
etw
e
en
Sh
er
if
fA
rp
ai
o
an
d th
e
E
x
ec
uti
ve B
ra
nc
h
rat
he
r
th
an
th
e
Ex
ec
ut
iv
e
B
r
an
ch
vi
ol
ati
ng
th
e
l
aw
s en
ac
te
d b
y
th
e
U
.
S.
C
o
ng
re
ss
.
T
hr
ou
gh
ou
t th
e
D
i
str
ict
C
o
ur
t re
lie
d u
po
n
ass
um
p
ti
on
s,
i
nf
er
en
ce
s
a
nd
u
np
ro
ve
n a
ss
er t
io
ns
of
fac
t
in
c
on
fl
ic t
w
i
th th
e
ob
lig
at
io
n
t
o tak
e
a
s t
ru
e
al
l
a
lle
g
ati
on
s
of
fa
c
t an
d in
fe
ren
ce
s dr
aw
n
fro
m
t
he
m on
a R
ul
e
2
b
l
m
o
tio
n.
A
pp
ell
an
t ha
s al
re
ad
y
s
uf
fer
ed fi
na
nc
ia
l ha
rm
a
n
d
bu
rd
en
s f
ro
m th
e 20
12
D
A
C
A
i
n 2
01
3
a
n
d
2
01
4
,
in
cl
ud
in
g f
ro
m th
e
flo
od
o
f u
n
ac
co
m
pa
ni
ed
m
ino
rs
in
the
S
um
m
e
r of
20
14
cr
os
si
ng th
e
M
exican border
as
a
resul t
of
the Appellees’
Jun e
5
2
01
2
, pr
om
is
e
of
am
n
est
y fo
r y
o
un
g f
or
eig
n
er s
A
s b
u
t on
e
e
xa
m
ple
of
h
arm
,
fr
om
F
eb
ru
ary
2
01
4,
th
ro
ug
h
De
ce
m
be
r
7
2
01
4,
th
e
co
st
s
o
f
h
ol
din
g
in
m
ate
s
fla
gg
ed w
ith
I
N
S “
d
eta
in
er
s” in
th
e S
h
eri
ff
s
jai
ls
w
as
9
,2
93
,6
19
.9
6. No
te
th
at
M
a
ri
co
pa
C
ou
nt
y i
nc
lu
de
s
6
0
o
f
the
p
op
ul
at
io
n of
th
e S
ta
te
of
Ar
iz
on
a.
Th
e
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
ur
t a
ls
o
rul
ed
th
at t
he
co
u
rt di
d
no
t ha
ve
th
e
po
w
er
to
r
ed
res
s
Sh
e
rif
f
A
rp
ai
o’
s in
ju
ry
.
T
he
Di
str
ic
t
C
ou
rt co
nc
lu
de
d
t
ha
t th
e i
nj
ur
y
wa
s
ca
us
ed
by th
e i
nd
ep
en
de
n
t a
ct
io
ns
o
f th
ir
d
pa
rt
ies
O
n
the
c
on
tr
ary
, if th
e
E
x
ec
ut i
ve
Br
an
ch
ob
ey
s C
o
ng
re
ss
io
na
l e
na
ctm
e
nt
s
US
C
A C
as
e
1
4
53
25
Do
cu
m
en
t
1
5
34
90
7
i
le
d 0
1/2
9
/2
01
5
P
ag
e 31
o
f
77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 32 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 32/78
an
d d
ep
or
ts f
ro
m
U
S
s
oi
l
so
m
e
or
all o
f t
he
e
st
im
at
ed
3 m
il
lio
n i
lle
ga
l a
lie
n
s
w
ill
no
t
be
i
n th
e
U
n
ite
d
S
tat
es
to
c
au
se a
ny
ha
rm o
r
bu rden
Current
governing
la
w m
a
nd
at
es
t
ha
t t
he
D
ef
en
da
nt
s
d
ep
or
t th
os
e
th
ird
p
ar
ty a
ct
or
s e
nt
ire
ly
Bu
t
t
o
e
v
ad
e
e
nf
or
ce
me
n
t of t
ho
se e
x
ist
in
g
im
m
ig
rat
io
n la
w
s t
he
De
fe
nd
an
t
A
pp
ell
ee
s
h
av
e c
re
at
ed
th
es
e “
de
fe
rre
d a
cti
on
”
pr
og
ra
m
s
t
o g
ran
t
am
n
es
ty
to
6
m
il
lio
n
i
lle
ga
l
a
lie
ns
T
he
re f
or
e
“
bu
t
f
or
”
t
he
A
pp
el
lee
s’
d
e
fer
re
d
a
ct
io
n p
ro
gr
am
s
cu
rr
en
t
g
o
ve
rn
ing
la
w
w
o
ul
d ap
pl
y
If
o
nl
y so
m
e
of
th
os
e
6
m
ill
ion
w
er
e a
b
se
nt f
ro
m
U
S
so
il
th
ere
w
ou
ld
be
a
s
ign
if
ic
an
t
de
cr
ea
se
in t
he
fi
na
nc
ia
l
c
os
ts
ha
rm
an
d bu
rd
en
s
to t
he
Sh
er
if
fs
O
ffi
ce
F
ur
the
rm
o
re
r
ea
l w
o
rld
em
p
iri
ca
l e
xp
er
ie
nc
e de
m
on
st
ra
tes
th
at
j
us
t
as
t
he
Ju
n
e 2
01
2
D
A
C
A
ca
us
ed
a
Summer 2014
flood
across the
border
millions
more
ill
eg
al al
ien
s wi
ll
b
e
at
tra
ct
ed b
y
t
he
l
ur
e an
d
h
op
e o
f fu
tu
re
am
n
es
ty as
a d
ire
ct
co
ns
eq
ue
nc
e
o
f
A
p
pe
lle
e
s’
gr
an
ti
ng
am
n
es
ty
to
6
m
ill
ion
ex
is
tin
g
ill
eg
al
al
ien
s
T
he
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
ur
t r
eje
ct
ed
rea
l
wo
rl
d ex
pe
rie
n
ce
of
pa
st h
ar
m
a
s
a
n
e
m
pir
ic
al b
a
sis
fo
r pr
ed
ic
tin
g
in
cr
ea
se
d
fu t
ur
e h
arm
R
ath
e
r th
an
c
red
it
in
g th
e
A
p
pe
lla
n
t’s ac
tu
al
ex
pe
ri
en
ce
s a
s
a s
ou
nd
b
as
is
fo
r
pr
oj
ec
tin
g
inc
re
as
ed ha
rm
th
e
D
is
tr
ict
C
ou
rt
co
nc
lu
de
d
t
ha
t a
ny
ha
rm
w
as
e
xc
lu
siv
e
ly
a re
su
lt o
fA
pp
el l
ee
p
a
st
ac
ts
o
r
o
m
iss
io
ns
an
d
no
t
tr
ac
ea
ble
to t
he
n
ew pr
og
ra
m
s
U
S
CA
C
a
se 1
4
53
2
5
D
oc
um
e
nt
15
34
9
07
P
ile
d: 0
1/
29
/2
01
5
Pa
ge
32
o
f 77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 33 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 33/78
A
RG
U
M
E
NT
I
.
Pr
es
ide
nt
’s
Pr
og
ra
ms
are
Unconstitutional Usurpation
of
Legislative Power
A
.
P
re
si
de
nt
do
es
n
o
t sh
ar
e
L
eg
isl
at
ive
P
ow
e
r
w
it
h
Co
n
gre
ss
T
he
un
co
ns
ti
tut
io
na
lit
y
o
f
the
A
p
pe
lle
es
’ d
ef
er
red
a
ct
io
n pr
og
ra
m
s
is c
lea
r.
A
p
pe
lla
nt
s
ca
nn
ot r
ew
r
ite
th
e
l
aw
s
e
na
cte
d
b
y
C
o
ng
re
ss . A
p
pe
lle
es
ar
e
ref
us
in
g
to
“
ta
ke
C
ar
e tha
t t
he
L
aw
s
be f
ai
thf
ul
ly e
xe
cu
te
d.
”
A
rt
ic
le I
I, Se
ct
io
n
o
f t
he
U
.S
.
C
o
ns
tit
ut
io
n.
M
e
an
w
hi
le,
th
e
Ex
e
cu
tiv
e B
ra
nc
h h
as
no
le
g
isl
at i
ve au
th
or
ity
e
xc
ep
t
a
ut
ho
rit
y d
el
eg
at
ed
fr
om
C
on
gr
es
s s
om
e
tim
e
s
r
efe
rr
ed
to
a
s “q
ua
si
leg
is
la
tiv
e
au
th
or
ity
”
. I
n
J.
W
Ha
m
pt
on
,
Jr.
Co
.
v
U
nit
ed
S
ta
tes
,
27
6
U
.S
.
3
94
,
4
05
—
06
19
22
,
Ch
ie
f
Ju
st
ice T
af
i
e
xp
la
in
ed
:
“The
Federal
Constitution..
divide[s]
the governmental power
in
to
th
re
e b
ra
nc
he
s.
...
[I
]n
c
ar
ry
in
g
ou
t
t
ha
t
c
on
sti
tu
tio
na
l
div
is
io
n.
i
t
is
a
bre
ac
h
o
f
the
N
a
tio
n
al
fu
nd
am
e
nt
al
la
w
if
C
on
gr
es
s
g
iv
es
u
p
its
leg
is
la
tiv
e p
o
we
r an
d
tr
an
sf
er
s
it
to th
e
P
re
si
de
nt
, or
to th
e
J
ud
ic
ia
l b
ra
nc
h o
r i
f
by la
w
it
a
tte
m
pts
to
inv
e
st i
tse
lf
o
r
its
m
e
m
be
rs w
it
h
ei
th
er
ex
ec
ut
iv
e po
w
er
or
ju
di
ci
al p
ow
e
r.”
H
ere
,
A
pp
ell
ee
s
cl
aim
th
ey
a
re
e
x
erc
is
in
g
th
e E
x
ec
ut
iv
e
B
ran
ch
’s
in
he
re
nt
autho rity. But “Federal autho rity
to
regulate
the sta tus
of
al iens
derives
from
va
ri
ou
s so
ur
ce
s,
in
clu
d
ing
the
Fe
de
ra
l
Go
v
ern
m
en
t’
s p
ow
e
r
‘[
t]
o e
st
ab
lis
h
[a
]
un
if
orm
R
ule
o
f
N
atu
ra
li
za
tio
n,
’ U
.S
.
C
on
st
., Ar
t.
I
8
ci
.
4
,
it
s p
ow
er
‘[t
]o
re
g
ula
te
C
o
mm
e
rc
e
w
ith
fo
re
ig
n N
a
tio
ns
,’
Id
. ci.
3
a
n
d
it
s b
ro
ad
a
ut
ho
ri
ty ov
er
U
SC
A
C
as
e
1
4
53
25
D
oc
u
me
n
t
15
34
9
07
Fi
le
d: 0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
a
ge
33
o
f
77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 34 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 34/78
f
or
eig
n
aff
ai
rs,
see U
n
it
ed
S
tat
es
v.
C
ur
tis
s-
W
rig
ht
E
x
po
rt
Co
rp
.,
29
9
U
. S
. 30
4,
2
99
U. S
.
3
1 19
3
6
;
M
at
he
w
s
v.
D
ia
z,
42
6
U
.S
.
67
19
7
6 ;
Harisiades
v.
S
ha
ug
h
ne
ss
y, 3
42
U
.
S
. 58
0
19
52
.
”
T
o
llv
. M
o
re
no
,
45
U
.
S. 1
1
0
1
9
82
.
St
atu
te
s
p
as
se
d
b
y
C
o
ng
re
ss
, n
ot
a
dm
i
nis
tr
ati
ve
p
ol
icy
, a
re
t
he
ex
cl
us
ive
au
th
or
ity
on th
es
e
q
ue
sti
on
s:
8 U
.S
.C
.
12
29
a
a
3 p
rov
id
es
:
“
E
xc
lus
iv
e
pr
oc
ed
ur
es
:
Un
le
ss
ot
he
rw
is
e
sp
ec
ifi
ed
in
th
is
chapter,
a
proceeding
under
this
section shall be
the
sole
an
d
e
xc
lu
si
ve
pr
oc
ed
u
re
for
de
te
rm
in
in
g
w
he
th
er an
al
ie
n
m
ay b
e
ad
m
it
ted t
o
t
he
Un
it
ed
St
ate
s
o
r,
if t
he
al
ie
n
ha
s
b
ee
n
so
ad
m
itt
ed
, r
em
o
ve
d f
ro
m
th
e
U
n
ite
d S
tat
es
.”
T
he
E
xe
cu
tiv
e B
r
an
ch
h
as
b
ee
n
co
m
m
an
de
d
b
y
st
atu
te
s
en
ac
te
d
by
C
o
ng
re
ss
, p
rim
a
ril
y
th
e
Im
m
ig
ra
tio
n a
n
d
Na
tu
ra
liz
at
ion
A
ct o
f
1
95
2
a
s
am
e
nd
ed
),
to
deport
to
their
own countries
of
citizensh
ip
an
e
sti
m
ate
d
11
.3
mi
lli
on
ci
tiz
en
s
of
fo
re
ig
n c
o
un
tri
es
in
t
he
U
ni
ted
St
at
es.
Se
e
e
.g
.
U
.
S.C
.
1
2
27
, 12
2
9a
,
12
31
.
Th
us
, w
h
ile
the
do
e
s c
ha
rg
e
D
H
S w
ith
d
ev
el
op
in
g na
ti
on
al
po
lic
y,
as
A
pp
ell
ee
s
a
rg
ue
,
t
he
s
ta
tu
te
al
so
r
es
tra
in
s
D
H
S
i
n th
e
pr
oc
ed
ur
es t
o
b
e
u
se
d fo
r
en
fo
rci
ng
d
ep
or
tat
io
n
re
m
ov
a
l) o
f
i
lle
ga
l
al
ien
s.
W
h
ile
“t
he
p
o
we
r
of
ex
ec
ut
in
g t
he
la
w
s
n
ec
es
sa
ril
y
inc
lu
de
s b
ot
h
au
th
or
ity
an
d
re
sp
on
si
bi
lit
y t
o
re
so
lv
e
so
m
e q
ue
sti
on
s
le
ft o
pe
n
b
y
C
o
ng
re
ss
t
ha
t
a
ris
e
d
uri
ng
t
he
law
’
s
ad
m
in
is
tra
tio
n,
”
it
d
o
es
n
o
t
in
cl
ud
e u
ni
la
ter
al
im
p
le
m
en
ta
tio
n o
f
leg
is
la
tiv
e
p
ol
ici
es
. U
t
ili
ty
A
ir
R
e
gu
la
to
ry
G
ro
up
v
. E
.P
.A
., 1
34
S
.C
t.
24
27
,
2
44
6
2
0
U
S
C
A
Ca
se
14
5
32
5
Do
cu
m
en
t
1
53
49
0
7
Fi
led
: 0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
ag
e 34
0
17
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 35 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 35/78
Ju
n.
23
, 20
1
4
. Th
e
P
res
id
en
t m
us
t
“t
ak
e C
ar
e
tha
t
th
e
L
aw
s
b
e
fa
ith
ft
tll
y
ex
e
cu
ted
h
e
m
ay
n
ot
ta
ke ex
ec
ut
ive
ac
ti
on
th
at cre
a
tes
l
aw
s.
U
.S
.
Co
ns
t.
, Art. II,
3
T
o p
ro
vi
de
l
eg
al
ju
st
ifi
ca
tio
n
fo
r
A
p
pe
lle
es
’
d
e
fer
re
d ac
tio
n
p
ro
gr
am
s
U.
S.
D
ep
ar
tm
en
t of J
us
tic
e
re
lea
se
d
a 3
3 p
ag
e leg
a
l
M
em
o
ra
nd
um
re
ve
ali
ng t
he
le
ga
l
a
na
ly
sis
an
d
a
dv
ic
e
of
th
e O
ff
ice
o
f
L
eg
al C
ou
n
se
l
O
L
C
.
JA 1
05
-1
3
7
A
pp
el
le
es
a
re
do
in
g w
ha
t
t
he
O
LC
w
a
rne
d w
ou
ld
b
e u
nc
on
st i
tu
tio
na
l.
On Pa
g
e 6
th
e
O
LC
M
em
o
ra
nd
um o
n
b
eh
al
f of
A
p
pe
ll
an
ts ad
m
its
t
ha
t:
“
Se
c
on
d
th
e
Ex
ec
ut
iv
e
c
an
n
ot, u
n
de
r
th
e g
ui
se
o
f
e
xe
rc
isi
ng
e
nf
or
ce
m
en
t d
isc
re
ti
on
,
at
tem
p
t
t
o
ef
fe
cti
ve
ly
r
ew
ri
te
t
he
la
w
s
to
m
a
tch
its p
o
lic
y p
re
fe
re
nc
es
.
Se
e I
d
a
t
83
3
an
ag
en
cy
m
a
y
no
t
“d
isr
eg
ar
d le
gi
sla
ti
ve
d
ir
ec
tio
n
in th
e
st
atu
to
ry
s
ch
em
e t
ha
t
[it
]
ad
m
in
is
ter
s”
. In
o
th
er
w
or
ds
, a
n
a
ge
nc
y’
s
en
fo
rc
em
e
nt
de
ci s
io
ns
s
ho
ul
d be
c
on
so
na
nt
wi
th
, ra
th
er
th
an
c
on
tra
ry
to
, the
c
on
g
res
si
on
al
po
lic
y
u
nd
e
rly
in
g
th
e
s
ta
tut
es th
e
ag
ency
is
charged
with
a
dm
i
nis
te
rin
g
.
C
f Y
o
un
gs
to
w
n,
34
3 U
.S
.
at
6
37
J
ac
ks
o
n,
J
.,
co
nc
ur
rin
g
“
W
h
en
th
e
P
re
si
de
nt t
ak
es
m
ea
su
re
s
i
nc
om
p
at
ib
le
w
it
h
th
e
ex
pr
es
sed
o
r
im
p
lie
d wi
ll
of C
o
ng
re
ss
hi
s p
o
we
r
is
a
t
it
s
l
ow
e
st
e
bb
.”
; N
a
t
A
ss
‘
o
f
H
om
e B
u
ild
er
s
v
D
e
fen
d
ers
o
f
W
il
dli
fe
,
55
1
U.
S.
6
4
4,
6
58
20
0
7
.”
O
n
Pa
ge 7
th
e O
L
C
M
e
m
or
an
du
m
on
b
eh
al
f
of
A
pp
el
la
nts a
dm
i
ts t
ha
t:
“T
hi
rd
the
Executive Branch ordinarily
cannot
as
the
Court
put
it
in
C
h
an
ey
“c
on
sc
iou
s
ly
a
nd
e
xp
re
ss
ly a
do
pt
[J
a
g
en
er
al po
li
cy
’
“
T
he
De
pa
rt
m
en
t
ofH
om
e
la
nd S
ec
ur
ity
‘ ’ A
ut
ho
ri
ty
to P
ri
ori
tiz
e
R
em
o
va
l
o
f
C
er
tai
n
A
l
ien
s
U
n
la
wf
ul
ly
Pr
es
en
t in
t
he
U
n
ite
d St
at
es
an
d to
De
fe
r R
em
ov
a
l
o
f
Ot
he
rs
”
da
te
d
N
ov
e
mb
er
1
9
2
01
4
.
A
co
py
is
a
tta
ch
e
d
a
s
E
xh
ib
it B
to th
e
Co
m
pl
ain
t.
U
S
CA
C
a
se
1
4
53
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
9
07
Fi
led
: 0
1/
29
/2
01
5
Pa
ge
35
of 77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 36 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 36/78
t
ha
t is
so
ex
tre
m
e
as t
o
a
m
ou
nt
to
a
n a
bd
ic
at
ion
of
i
ts s
ta
tu
to r
y
r
es
po
ns
ib
ili
tie
s.
” 47
0
U
.
S.
a
t
8
33 n
.4
qu
ot
ing
A
d
am
s
R
ich
ar
ds
on
4
80
f
.2d
11
5
9, 11
6
2
D
.C
. Ci
r.
1
97
3)
en
banc));
see
Id
no
ti
ng th
at
in
s
itu
a
tio
ns w
he
re a
n
ag
e
nc
y h
ad a
do
pt
ed
s
uc
h an
ex
tr
em
e
po
lic
y
, “t
he
sta
tu
te
co
n
fer
ri
ng a
u
tho
ri
ty o
n
th
e a
g
en
cy
m
ig
ht in
d
ica
te
tha
t
s
u
ch d
ec
isi
on
s w
er
e
n
ot
‘
co
m
m
itte
d to
ag
en
cy
di
sc
re
tio
n”
.
A
bd
ic
ati
on
o
f
t
he
d
ut
ies
a
ss
ig
ne
d to
th
e
a
g
en
cy
by
s
ta
tu
te
is or
di
na
ri l
y
inc
o
mp
a
tib
le
w
ith
t
he
c
o
ns
titu
ti
on
al
o
bl
ig
at
ion
to
fa
ith
fu
ll
y
ex
ec
u
te
t
he
l
aw
s. B
ut
se
e,
e.
g.
P
re
sid
en
ti
al Au
th
or
it
y
to
D
ec
lin
e to
E
xe
cu
te U
n
co
ns
tit
uti
on
al
St
atu
te
s 8
O
p
.
O.
LC
.
19
9
20
0
1
99
4) n
ot
in
g t
ha
t
un
d
er
th
e T
a
ke Ca
re C
la
us
e,
“
th
e
P
re
si
de
nt
is
re
qu
ire
d to
ac
t
i
n
a
cc
or
da
nc
e
w
ith
th
e
law
s—including
the
C
on
st
itu
ti
on
w
h
ic
h tak
e
s
pr
ec
ed
en
ce
ov
e
r o
th
er fo
rm
s
o
f l
aw
”
).”
O
n Pa
ge 24
,
t
he
OL
C
M
e
m
or
an
du
m on
be
ha
lf
o
f
A
pp
el
la
nts
a
dm
it
s
t
ha
t:
“I
m
mi
gr
at
ion
o
ffi
ci
al s
c
an
no
t
ab
di
ca
te
th
e
ir
sta
tu
to
ry
res
p
on
sib
il
iti
es
u
nd
er
th
e
g
uis
e
of
e
xe
rc
isi
ng
en
fo
rc
em
e
nt
d
isc
re
tio
n
.
Se
e
su
pr
a
p
.
7
ci t
in
g
C
h
an
ey
47
0
U.
S.
at
83
3
n.
4)
.
A
n
d
an
y
ne
w
d
ef
err
ed
ac
ti
on
p
rog
ra
m
sh
ou
ld
lea
ve
r
oo
m
fo
r
i
nd
iv
id
ua
liz
ed evaluation
of
whether
a
particular
case
warrants
the
e
xp
e
nd
itu
re
of
r
es
ou
rc
es
fo
r en
fo
rc
em
en
t.
Se
e
su
pr
a
p.
7 c
it i
ng
G
lic
km
a
n
9
6
f
.3d
at 1
12
3
,
an
d
C
r
ow
le
y
C
a
rib
b
ea
n
T
ran
sp
. 3
7
F.
3d
at
67
6—
7
7
.
F
ur
th
erm
o
re
be
ca
us
e de
fe
rre
d ac
ti
on
pr
og
ra
m
s
de
p
art
in
c
er
ta i
n
re
sp
ec
ts
fr
om
mo
re
f
am
il
ia
r
an
d
w
ide
sp
re
ad
e
x
erc
is
es
o
f
en
fo
rc
em
e
nt d
isc
re
tio
n
p
a
rti
cu
lar
ly
c
are
fu
l
e
x
am
in
at
ion
is
ne
ed
ed
to
en
su
re
th
at
a
ny
pr
op
os
ed
ex
pa
ns
io
n o
f
d
ef
err
ed a
ct
io
n
co
m
p
lie
s
wi
th
th
es
e g
en
er
al
pr
in
cip
le
s
so t
ha
t th
e
p
ro
po
se
d
pr
og
ra
m
d
o
es no
t,
in
ef
fe
ct,
c
ro
ss th
e
lin
e
be
tw
ee
n
ex
ecuting
the
law and
rewriting
it.”
Ye
t t
he
A
p
pe
lle
es
’ are
d
oi
ng
ex
ac
tl
y
w
ha
t
O
L
C
w
a
rn
ed
the
m
no
t t
o do
.
Ap
pe
ll
ee
s’ p
ro
gr
am
s a
re
n
ot
p
ro
se
cu
to
ri
al d
is
cr
eti
on
bu
t
r
ew
ri
tin
g
th
e s
ta
tut
es
.
A
pp
el
lec
s s
ee
k
to
gr
an
t a
m
ne
sty
t
o
an
e
st
im
at
ed 6
m
il
lio
n
53
) o
f
th
e
est
im
at
ed
2
2
U
S
C
A
C
ase
1
4
53
25
Do
c
um
e
nt
1
53
49
07
Fi
led
:
01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e 3
6 of
77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 37 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 37/78
11
3
m
il
lio
n
ille
g
al
ali
en
s
t
ha
t C
o
ng
re
ss
io
na
l
e
n
ac
tm
en
ts
co
m
m
an
d
th
em
to
de
po
rt
.
P
re
si
de
nt
O
ba
m
a a
rgu
e
s
th
at h
is
e
xe
cu
tiv
e
ac
tio
n
w
as
n
ec
es
sa
ry
because
of
C
on
gr
es
s’
s f
ai l
ur
e t
o p
as
s
le
gis
la
tio
n,
ac
ce
pt
ab
le
to
hi
m
.
C
om
p
i.
23
-2
4.
J
A
7
-
6
0
M
o
tio
n
fo
r P
re
lim
i
na
ry
I
nj
un
ct
io
n a
t
p
ag
es
30
-3
2.
J
A
6 1
-9
9
H
o
we
ve
r,
“I
n t
he
f
ra
me
w
or
k
o
f o
ur
Co
ns
ti
tut
io
n,
th
e
P
re
sid
en
t’
s
p
ow
e
r
t
o s
ee t
ha
t th
e
la
w
s
a
re
fai
th
fu
lly
e
x
ec
ute
d
r
ef
ute
s
t
he
id
e
a
t
ha
t
he
is
to
be
a
law
m
a
ke
r.
T
he
Co
ns
tit
ut
io
n
lim
it
s
his
fu
nc
tio
n
s
in t
he
l
aw
m
ak
in
g
p
roc
es
s
t
o
th
e
re
co
m
me
n
din
g
of
law s
he thinks
w
is
e
and
th
e
v
eto
in
g o
f l
aw
s
he
t
hi
nk
s
b
ad
.”
Y
ou
ng
st
ow
n
Sh
ee
t
T
u
be
Co
Sa
w
ye
r,
3
4
3
U.
S.
57
9
,
5
8
7
19
52
.
C
o
ng
re
ss
’s
l
aw
m
ak
in
g
p
ow
er
is
n
ot
su
bje
ct
to
P
re
si
de
nt
ia
l
su
pe
rv
is
io
n
o
r
co
nt
ro
l.
Id
.
S
om
e
tim
e
s
C
o
ng
re
ss
d
e
leg
at
es
l
aw
-m
a
ki
ng
au
tho
ri
ty
to t
he
E
x
ec
ut
ive
B
ra
nc
h
e
xp
lic
itl
y o
r
im
p
lic
itl
y t
o “fill up
the de tails.”
The U.S.
Supreme
Court
in
W
ay
m
an
S
ou
th
ar
d2
3
U
.S
.
10
W
he
at.
1
82
5
re
je
cte
d
th
e
c
on
te
nt
io
n th
at
C
on
g
res
s h
ad
u
nc
on
st
itu
tio
n
all
y
d
e
leg
at
ed
p
ow
e
r
to
th
e
f
ed
er
al c
o
ur t
s
to
es
tab
li
sh
ru
le
s
of pr
ac
tic
e
w
h
er
e
an
ot
he
r
b
ra
nc
h
m
er
ely
fil
led
in
de
ta i
ls
.
So
-c
al
led
“
ga
ps
”
or
qu
es
tio
n
s
le
ft u
na
dd
re
ss
ed
w
it
hi
n
C
on
gr
es
sio
na
l
en
a
ctm
e
nt
s a
re
in
he
re
nt
w
i
thi
n
th
e
C
on
gr
es
sio
na
l
s
tat
ut
e
as
b
e
ing
un
av
oi
da
bl
y
n
ec
ess
ar
y
t
o im
p
lem
e
nt
th
e
st
atu
te
.
B
u
t s
tr
iki
ng
ly
ab
se
nt
h
ere
,
A
pp
el
le
es
d
o n
o
t po
in
t to
an
y
ter
m
o
f th
e
m
m
g
rat
io
n a
nd
N
at
ur
ali
za
tio
n
A
ct
N
A
,
as
am
e
nd
ed
,
w
hi
ch l
ea
ve
s
th
e
Ex
ec
ut
iv
e
B
ra
nc
h
un
c
ert
ai
n
h
ow
t
o p
ro
c
ee
d.
A
p
pe
ll
ee
s
h
av
e
m
ad
e n
o
s
ho
w
in
g o
f
an
y
“g
ap
”
2
3
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 38/78
U
S
C
A
C
a
se 1
4-
53
2
5
D
oc
u
me
nt
1
53
49
07
F
il
ed
: 0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
ag
e 38 o
f 7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 39 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 39/78
be
n
efi
ci
ari
es
f
ro
m 20
1
2,
a
n
d
i
ss
ue
an
d
m
a
il
ce
rti
fic
at
es of
im
m
u
ni
ty
to
mi
lli
on
il l
eg
al
ali
en
s. T
hi
s
w
i
ll
b
e rep
ea
te
d ev
er
y th
re
e
y
ea
rs
. An
d
all of
th
is
b
ec
au
se
th
ey
sa
y
t
he
y
d
o
n
o
t
h
av
e en
ou
gh
res
ou
rc
es
t
o
en
fo
rc
e c
u
rre
nt l
aw
. L
a
ck
o
f f
un
d
ing
i
s
n
ot a
p
er
su
as
ive
j
us
tif
ica
ti
on
fo
r
th
es
e
pr
og
ra
m
s w
it
h th
ei
r a
dd
ed
e
xp
en
di
tu
re
s.
B
T
he
D
ist
ric
t Co
u
rt
re
as
on
ed th
at
“d
e
fer
re
d a
cti
on
”
pro
g
ram
s
by t
he
E
x
ec
uti
ve Br
an
ch
in t
he
pa
st
p
ro
v
ide
le
ga
l a
ut
ho
ri
ty n
ow
Th
e Di
st
ric
t
C
o
ur
t re
as
on
e
d
th
at
a
his
to
ry
of
th
e
Ex
e
cu
tiv
e
B
ra
nc
h
using
m
uc
h
m
or
e li
mi
te
d for
m
s of
de
fe
rr
ed
ac
tio
n
in
th
e
pa
st p
ro
v
ide
s
le
g
al ju
st
ifi
ca
tio
n
f
or
th
ese
ne
w
d
ef
er
re
d
ac
ti
on
pro
g
ra
ms n
o
w.
S
e
e.
M
e
m
or
an
du
m
O
pin
io
n
“M
e
m
.
O
p.”
,
D
e
ce
mb
er
2
3 2
01
4,
at 3
-7
.
Bu
t,
o
n th
e c
on
tr
ary
,
Ex
ec
ut
iv
e
Br
an
ch a
ct
ion
s
ha
ve
no
pr
ec
ed
en
ti
al
authority
. H
i
sto
ri
ca
lly
c
ou
rts
h
av
e c
ho
se
n as
an
in
he
re
nt
pa
rt
of
th
ei
r f
un
c
tio
ni
ng
to
pr
om
o
te co
ns
is
te
nc
y
to
ad
o
pt
a s
ys
te
m
of
bi
nd
in
g
p
re
ce
d
en
ts
B
u
t
E
x
ec
ut i
ve
B
ra
n
ch
ac
tio
n
s
d
o
no
t
h
av
e p
re
ce
de
n
tia
l
au
th
or
ity
ex
ce
p
t t
o
the e
xt
en
t
th
at
th
e
A
PA
p
ro
hib
it
s
arb
it
ra
ry
o
r c
ap
ri
cio
u
s
de
cis
io
ns
, w
hi
ch
ty
p
ica
ll
y re
q
uir
es
a
dm
i
ni
str
at
ive
de
ci
sio
ns c
o
ns
ist
en
t
w
i
th
pa
st p
ractice.
But
Appellants
here
reject
th
e
p
ro
po
sit
io
n t
ha
t th
ei
r d
ef
err
ed ac
tio
n
pr
og
ra
ms
ar
e g
ov
er
ne
d
b
y
th
e
A
PA
.
A
c
co
rd
in
gl
y
t
he
A
pp
el
la
nt
s’
p
rog
ra
m
m
us
t
s
ta
nd
or
f
all
on or
ig
ina
l
le
ga
l
a
ut
ho
rit
y, n
ot o
n
p
as
t p
ra
cti
ce
s
w
h
ich
a
re
al
so
ch
al
len
g
ed
as leg
a
lly
in
va
li
d.
U
C
as
e
1
4
53
25
Do
cu
m
en
t
1
53
49
07
ile
d
0
1
/29
/2
01
5
P
ag
e
39
o
f
7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 40 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 40/78
C
.
T
h
e
D
ist
ric
t C
o
urt
an
al
yz
ed t
ha
t C
on
g
res
s h
as
e
nd
o
rse
d
th
e u
se
of
“d
ef
err
ed
a
ct
ion
”
in c
er t
ai
n
ci
rc
um
st
an
ce
s
y
et
h
as
no
t d
o
ne
so h
e
re.
The
District
Court
was
pe
rs
ua
de
d
th
at
C
o
ng
re
ss
h
a
s e
nd
or
se
d t
he
u
se o
f
“d
efe
rr
ed ac
tio
n
”
in ge
ne
ra
l.
S
ee
M
e
m.
p at
7 3
2. H
ow
e
ve
r
C
on
gr
es
si
on
al
au
th
or
iz
ati
on o
f
de
fe
rre
d
a
ct
io
n
in c
er
ta
in ,
v
er
y
sp
ec
if
ic sit
ua
tio
ns
d
o
es
no
t
a
ut
ho
riz
e
d
ef
er
re
d ac
ti
on fo
r
an
y
a
nd
a
ll
p
ur
po
se
s
G
ran
ts o
f
de
le
ga
te
d a
ut
ho
ri
ty
ar
e
c
on
st
ru
ed
n
ar
ro
wl
y no
t
b
ro
ad
ly
Am
e
ric
an
Tr
uc
ki
ng
A
sso
c
iat
io
ns
In
c.
supra
If
C
o
ng
re
ss
in
ten
d
ed
to a
ut
ho
riz
e an
y
a
n
d a
ll
de
fe
rre
d a
ct
io
n th
e
Ex
ec
ut
iv
e
B
ra
nc
h
m
ig
ht
w
is
h t
o
un
de
rta
k
e C
on
gr
es
s k
no
w
s h
ow
to
sa
y
s
o.
“C
o
ng
re
ss k
n
ow
s
h
o
w to
l
im
it
o
r ex
p
an
d
fo
ra fo
r
ag
en
cy
e
n
for
ce
m
en
t o
f su
bp
oe
na
s
i
f
it
wi
sh
es
to do
so
.”
N
.L
.R
.B
. v
Co
o
pe
r
T
ire
R
ub
b
er
C
o.
43
8
F
3
d
1
19
8
D
.C
. Ci
r.,
20
06
.
I
I.
A
pp
el
le
es
’ P
ro
gr
am
s
M
us
t
C
om
p
ly w
it
h
Ad
m
in
is
tra
tiv
e
P
ro
ce
du
re
s
A
c
t
A
lte
rn
at
iv
ely
to
e
x
erc
is
e au
th
or
ity
d
el
eg
at
ed
fr
om
Co
n
gre
ss
t
he
E
xe
cu
ti
ve
B
ran
ch m
u
st
ac
t
c
on
si
ste
nt
ly
w
ith
a
ut
ho
riz
in
g
sta
tu
te
s
an
d
c
om
p
ly p
ro
ce
du
ra
ll
y
w
i
th
t
he A
PA
S
ee A
m
er
ica
n T
ru
ck
in
g A
s
s ‘n
s
Inc
. v
E
PA
,
s
up
ra
fir
st
pu
rs
ua
nt
to
U
S
C
7
02
,
a
pe
rs
on
ag
g
rie
ve
d
o
r ad
ve
rs
ely
a
ff
ec
ted
by
ag
en
c
y
a
c
tio
n
is
en
ti
tle
d
to
jud
ic
ia
l
re
vie
w
a
nd
a c
ivi
l c
au
se o
f
ac
ti
on
.
Se
co
n
d,
pu
rsu
a
nt
to
th
e
AP
A
,
5
U
.S.
C.
7
06
2
,
th
is C
o
ur t
m
u
st
h
old
u
nl
aw
fu
l
a
nd
se
t a
si
de
an
y
ag
en
cy
ac
ti
on t
ha
t
is
6
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 41/78
U
C
a
se
1
4
53
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
9
07
Fi
le
d:
0
1/
29
/2
01
5 Pa
ge
4
1 of 7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 42 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 42/78
F
u
rth
er
i
n M
or
ton
R
uiz
, 4
15
U
.S
. 1
9
9 2
32
19
7
4
,
t
he
U.
S.
Su
pr
em
e
C
o
ur
t
h
eld
th
at t
he
B
u
re
au o
f In
di
an
A
ffa
ir
s
c
ou
ld
n
ot c
re
ate
‘e
lig
ib
il
ity
r
eq
u
ire
m
en
ts’ fo
r
a
ll
oc
ati
ng
f
un
ds
w
it
ho
ut co
m
pl
yin
g
w
it
h
t
he
A
PA
r
eq
ui
rem
e
nt
s
t
o
es
tab
li
sh
t
he cr
ite
ri
a
by
r
eg
ul
ato
ry
ru
le
-m
ak
in
g.
Id
a
t
2
30
2
36
.
H
er
e A
p
pe
lle
es
cr
ea
ted
eli
gi
bi
lity
c
rit
er
ia
in a
s
im
il
ar tec
h
niq
u
e.
D
HS
’
c
rit
er
ia d
et
er
m
ine th
e
ri
gh
t o
f
m
il
lio
ns
o
f
oth
e
rw
is
e
i
lle
ga
l a
lie
n
s
to
re
m
ain
i
n
t
he
U.S.
The
eligibility criteria t
rig
g
ers t
he
AP
A h
er
e
as i
t
d
id
u
nd
er
R
uiz
A
pp
el
lee
s’
pr
og
ra
m
s
ar
e
als
o
su
bj
ec
t to th
e A
P
A
’s
r
ule
m
ak
in
g r
eq
ui
re
m
en
ts
b
ec
au
se th
ey
a
re
su
bs
ta
nti
ve ru
le
s. A
ru
le
is s
ub
sta
n
tiv
e “
if
it
ei t
he
r
ap
pe
ar
s
o
n
its
f
ac
e to be
bi
nd
in
g,
or
i
s
ap
pl
ied
b
y th
e
a
ge
nc
y
in
a w
a
y t
ha
t in
d
ica
te
s
i
t is bi
nd
in
g
”
G
en
er
al
El
ec
. C
o E
PA
29
0
F
.3
d 37
7,
3
83
D.
C
. Ci
r. 2
00
2
.
S
im
ila
rl
y,
S
yncor
Int
’l C
o
rp
.
S
ha
la
la
1
27 F
.3
d
90
94
D
.C
. C
ir
19
97
h
e
ld
tha
t the
pr
im
ar
y
d
is
tin
ct
ion
be
tw
e
en a
su
bs
tan
ti
ve
r
ul
e
an
d
a
ge
ne
ra
l
s
tat
em
e
nt
of p
ol
ic
y t
ur
ns
o
n
w
h
eth
er
an
ag
en
cy
in
ten
d
s
to bi
nd
i
ts
elf
to
a p
art
ic
ula
r l
eg
al
po
si
tio
n
. Id
H
e
re
,
Ap
p
ell
ee
s
or
de
re
d D
H
S
pe
rs
on
ne
l
t
o
im
m
e
dia
te
ly
sto
p de
po
rt
ati
on
o
f
thos
e
who o
nl
y
m
ig
ht
m
ee
t
th
e
cr
ite
ri
a,
e
ve
n if
t
he
y
h
a
ve
no
t
a
p
pl i
ed
fo
r d
ef
er r
ed
ac
tio
n
st
at
us
.
Se
e,
M
em
o
ra
nd
u
m
E
x
hi
bi
t
D to
M
o
t. P
re
lim
.
In
jun
c
.
a
t 5
J
A 14
4
-
1
49
T
h
e A
p
pe
lle
es
’ p
ro
gr
am
s
ar
e
bi
nd
in
g
up
on
d
ep
or
tat
io
n de
c
isi
on
s
by
D
H
.
U
SCA
a
se
14
5325
D
ocum
ent
153
490
7
F
iled:
01
/29/
2015
a
ge
42 o
f 77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 43 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 43/78
M
o
re
ov
er
in
Ne
w Je
rs
ey
EP
A
62
6
F.2
d 10
38 , 1
045
D
.C.
C
ir.
198
0 , t
he
D
C
C
ir
cu
it h
eld th
a
t
EP
A
’s
A
dm
i
nis
tr
ato
r “e
rre
d in
de
cl
in
ing to
ad
he
re
to
the
no
tic
e
an
d
co
m
m
en
t
r
eq
u
ire
m
en
ts
o
f sec
ti
on
553
o
f th
e A
PA
.
”
T
he
D
C
C
ir
cu
it
e
mp
h
as
ize
d
“t
ha
t ju
dic
ia
l r
ev
iew
o
f a
ru
le p
ro
m
ul
ga
te
d
u
nd
er an e
xc
ep
ti
on
to t
he
AP
A’s
n
oti
ce
a
nd
c
om
m
e
nt
re
qu
ir
em
en
t
m
us
t
b
e
g
u
ide
d
by C
on
gr
es
s’s e
xp
e
cta
tio
n
t
ha
t su
ch
e
xc
e
pt i
on
s
w
i
ll b
e
na
rr
ow
ly
co
ns
tru
ed
.”
Id
Appel lants ’
prog
ra
ms
are
le
gis
la
tiv
e
ru
le
s
s
ub
je
ct to
th
e
r
ul
em
a
kin
g
r
eq
ui
re
m
en
ts
o
f the A
P
A
be
ca
us
e
e
ac
h
M
em
o
ra
nd
a
“
pu
ts
a s
ta
m
p
o
f ag
en
cy
ap
pr
ov
al
o
r
d
is
ap
pr
ov
al
o
n
a
giv
e
n
typ
e of
b
eh
av
io
r.
”
C
ha
m
be
r
ofCo
m
m
er
ce
D
O
L 17
4
F
.3d
20
6
21
2
D.C.
C
ir.
199
9 .
In C
h
am
b
er o
fCo
m
m
er
ce
the
D
C
C
ir
cu
it h
el
d
th
at
th
e U
S
L
ab
o
r De
pa
rt
m
en
t
p
ro
mu
lg
at
ed a s
ub
sta
n
tiv
e r
ule
wh
e
n it
to
ld
e
mp
lo
ye
rs
t
ha
t t
he
y co
ul
d av
o
id
7
0
-90
of
w
or
kp
la
ce
i
ns
pe
ct i
on
s i
f t
he
y
pa
rt
ici
pa
te
d
in
a n
e
w “
C
oo
pe
ra
tiv
e Co
m
pl
ia
nc
e”
[i.e.
, ex
ec
ut
iv
e ac
ti
on
]
p
rog
ra
m
174
F.
3d
at 20
8.
He
re
sim
i
lar
ly
Ap
p
ell
an
ts es
tab
li
sh c
rit
er
ia
so
th
at
tho
se
w
ho
p
art
ic
ipa
te a
re
d
esi
gn
at
ed lo
we
r
ris
k
a
nd
av
oi
d
en
fo
rc
em
e
nt
an
d
pr
os
ec
ut
io
n.
C
o
ng
re
ss
p
as
se
d th
e A
P
A
“to
im
p
ro
ve th
e
ad
m
in
ist
ra
tio
n
o
f
ju
sti
ce b
y
pr
es
cr
ib
ing
fa
ir ad
m
in
ist
ra
tiv
e p
ro
ce
du
re
.”
D
av
id
B
Ch
a
ffm
N
o
te
Re
m
ed
ie
sfo
r
No
n
co
m
pli
an
ce wi
th S
ec
ti
on
553
of
the
Ad
m
in
is
tra
tiv
e Pr
oc
ed
ur
e
A
c
t:
A C
rit
ic
al
Ev
al
ua
tio
n
o
f
U
ni
te
d
S
tat
es
St
ee
l an
d W
este
rn
O
il
G
as
1
982
D
uk
e L.J.
4
61
4
62
9
U
S
C
A
Ca
se
14
5
32
5 D
o
cu
m
en
t
1
53
49
07
P
il
ed
:
0
1/2
9
/2
01
5
P
ag
e 4
3
o
f 77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 44 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 44/78
1
98
2
. “
W
he
n
a
c
o
ur
t
a
llo
w
s
s
uc
h
a ru
le
t
o
r
em
a
in i
n
f
or
ce
, it
ex
te
nd
s
th
e
l
ife o
f
an il l
eg
it i
m
ate
ex
er
ci
se
of
po
w
er a
nd
[]p
ro
m
ot
es
a
bu
se
s
o
f
po
w
er.
” I
d
a
t
4
74
•7
“S
in
ce
the
en
a
ctm
e
nt o
f th
e A
P
A
, nu
m
er
ou
s
ru
le
s h
av
e be
en
c
ha
lle
ng
ed on
th
e
gro
u
nd
th
at
th
e
p
ro
mu
lg
at
in
g
a
ge
nc
y
d
id
no
t co
m
pl
y
w
ith th
e
p
ro
ce
du
ra
l
r
eq
ui
rem
e
nt
s
o
f s
ec
tio
n
55
3.
” I
d at
46
4
. “
M
o
st c
ou
rt
s
su
st
ai
nin
g
s
uc
h p
ro
ce
d
ur
al
c
h
al l
en
ge
s
i
m
me
d
iat
el
y
i
nv
al
id
ate th
e
ru
le a
nd re
m
an
d the
ca
se
to
th
e
ag
en
c
y
w
ith
instructions
to
follow proper se
ct
io
n
552 p
ro
ce
du
re
s. T
he
[
D.
C. C
irc
ui
t]
fo
ll
ow
ed
th
is p
rac
ti
ce i
n
T
ab
or
v Jo
in
t Bo
ar
d
fo
r
E
nr
ol
lm
en
t of
A
c
tu
ar
ies
56
6
F.
2d
7
5
D
.C
. Ci
r.
1
9
77
1
.”
I
d
a
t
4
6
4 6
6
.
Th
e A
P
A
,
5
U.
S.
C.
§
5
5
3
b),
re
qu
ir
es
t
ha
t
“[
g]
en
er
al no
ti
ce
of
pro
p
os
ed
ru
le
ma
k
ing sh
al
l
be
pu
bl
ish
e
d
in
t
he
F
ed
er
al
R
eg
is
te
r,
u
nl
ess p
er
so
ns
su
bje
ct th
er
et
o
a
re
na
m
ed a
nd
eit
he
r
p
er
so
na
lly
se
rv
ed o
r o
th
erw
i
se
h
a
ve ac
tu
al
no
ti
ce
th
er
eo
f
in
ac
co
rd
an
ce
wi
th
la
w.
”
“
A
fte
r
n
o
tic
e
r
eq
ui
re
d
b
y t
hi
s se
ct
io
n, th
e
a
ge
nc
y
sh
al
l
giv
e
i
nt
er
est
ed p
er
so
ns a
n
o
pp
or
tu
nit
y
to
p
art
ic
ipa
te in
th
e
ru
le
m
ak
in
g th
ro
ug
h
s
ub
m
iss
io
n of
w
rit
te
n da
ta
, vi
ew
s
or
ar
gu
m
en
ts
w
ith or
w
i
tho
u
t o
pp
or
tu
nit
y fo
r
h
tt
p:
//s
ch
ol
ars
hi
p .la
w
.du
k
e.e
du
/c
gi
/v
iew
c
on
te
nt
.cg
i?
ar
tic
le
=2
80
9
c
o
nte
xt
=
dl
j.
C
it
in
g Se
na
te
Co
m
m
. O
n T
he
J
ud
ic
ia
ry
A
dm
i
ni
str
ati
ve P
ro
ce
du
re
A
c
t:
R
ep
or
t
O
f
T
he
C
om
m
it
tee
O
n
T
h
e
J
ud
ic
ia
ry
S
R
ep
.
N
o
. 75
2,
79
th C
on
g.
,
1s
t S
e
ss
.
7 1
9
45
, r
ep
rin
te
d i
n
Le
gi
sla
ti
ve H
is
to
ry
O
f Th
e
A
d
mi
ni
str
at
ive P
ro
ce
du
re A
ct,
S
Do
c
. N
o.
24
8,
79
th
C
on
g
., 2
d
S
es
s.
1
1
8
7
1
94
6
.
U
C
a
se
1
4
53
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
9
07
Fi
led
:
0
1/
29
/2
01
5 P
ag
e 4
4 o
f
77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 45 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 45/78
o
ra
l
pr
es
en
ta
tio
n.
” U
.S
.C
.
55
3
c
.
Fi
na
lly
, “th
e
re
qu
ir
ed
p
ub
lic
at
io
n o
r s
erv
ic
e
of
a
su
b
sta
nt
iv
e r
ule
sh
al
l
b
e m
a
de
no
t le
ss
t
ha
n
30
da
ys b
ef
or
e it
s ef
fe
cti
ve
da
te
.”
U
.S
.C
.
5
53
d
.
A
s a re
su
lt
, A
pp
el
la
nts
’ p
ro
gr
am
s
m
us
t
c
om
p
ly
w
it
h
A
PA ru
le
-m
a
kin
g
.
I
II.
A
pp
el
la
nt h
a
s s
ho
w
n v
ali
d g
ro
un
d
s fo
r
a
pr
el
im
in
ar
y in j
un
ct
io
n
A
p
pe
lla
n
t
m
o
ve
d
f
or
a
p
rel
im
in
ar
y
in
ju
nc
tio
n.
J
A
61
-9
9)
T
o
o
bt
ain
injunctive
relief,
a
pl
ain
ti
ff
m
u
st d
em
o
ns
tra
te
1) a su
bs
tan
ti
al
li
ke
lih
oo
d o
f s
uc
ce
ss
o
n th
e
m
e
rit
s;
2
) p
lai
nt
iff
w
ill
l
ik
ely
s
uf
fe
r “
irr
ep
ar
ab
le in
ju
ry
”
wi
th
ou
t
r
el
ief
;
3
)
t
ha
t an
o
rd
er
w
ou
ld no
t
su
bs
ta
nt
ial
ly
i
nju
re
ot
he
r i
nt
er
est
ed
pa
rti
es
; an
d
4)
t
ha
t th
e
p
ub
lic in
ter
es
t w
ou
ld
b
e fu
rt
he
red
. W
as
hi
ng
to
n
M
e
tr
o.
A
re
a
T
ra
ns
it
C
o
m
m ‘n
v
H
o
lid
a
y To
u
rs,
In
c.,
55
9
f.2
d
8
41
,
84
3
D
.C
. C
ir.
1
97
7
).
No one
factor
is
de
ter
m
in
at i
ve
. R
ath
er
, “
[tJ
he
se
fa
cto
rs
in
te r
re
la t
e o
n
a
s
lid
in
g
sc
ale
an
d m
u
st
b
e
ba
la
nc
ed
ag
ai
ns
t ea
ch
o
the
r.
” S
er
on
o L
a
bo
ra
to
rie
s, I
nc
. v
S
ha
la
la,
15
F
.3
d
13
13
,
1
3
18
D
.C
.C
ir.
1
99
8)
;
Ci
ty
fed
f
in.
C
orp
.
v O
ff
ice
o
f
Th
rf
t
S
u
pe
rv
isi
on
,
5
F
.3
d
7
38
, 74
7
D
.C
.C
ir
.1
99
5 “
If
th
e ar
gu
m
en
ts
fo
r o
n
e
fa
ct
or a
re
p
ar
ti
cu
lar
ly
str
on
g,
an
i
nju
n
ct i
on
m
ay
is
su
e
e
ve
n
if
the
a
rg
um
e
nts
in o
th
er
a
rea
s
a
re r
ath
er
w
e
ak
.”
.
W
h
er
e
a pa
rt
y
c
an
de
m
on
str
at
e
“p
ro
ba
b
le
s
uc
ce
ss o
n th
e m
e
rit
s,”
th
e
pa
rty
ne
ed
o
nly
e
st
ab
lis
h
a
“p
o
ssi
bi
lit
y o
f ir
re
pa
ra
bl
e
in j
ur
y.
”
H
o
li
da
y
T
ou
rs
55
9 F.
2d
a
t
4
1.
F
irs
t,
A
pp
el
lan
t
is li
ke
ly to
p
rev
a
il
on th
e m
e
rit
s.
Ap
p
ell
ee
s’ p
ro
gr
am
s
ar
e
U
S
CA
C
as
e 1
4
53
2
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t 1
53
4
90
7
F
ile
d:
0
1/2
9
/20
1
5
Pa
g
e
45
o
f 7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 46 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 46/78
un
co
ns
tit
ut
io
na
l,
u
su
rp
in
g
th
e l
eg
isl
at
iv
e
ro
le
o
f
Co
ng
re
ss
a
nd
re
fu
si
ng
to
“
ta
ke
C
a
re
t
ha
t
th
e
L
aw
s b
e
fa
ith
fu
ll
y
ex
ec
ut
ed
.”
A
r
tic
le
I
I,
S
ec
tio
n
o
f the
U
.S
.
Co
ns
ti
tu t
io
n.
A
p
pe
lle
es
ca
nn
ot
s
im
pl
y
r
efu
s
e
t
o
e
n
for
ce
t
he
la
w
wi
th
r
eg
ar
d
to
n
ea
rly
5
0
o
f th
e a
li
en
s th
e
la
w
c
om
m
a
nd
s
th
em
to d
ep
o
rt
o
r r
ew
ri
te
sta
tu
te
s.
A
lt
er
na
tiv
el
y,
A
pp
el
la
nt
i
s
l
ik
el
y
t
o
pr
ev
ai
l o
n
A
pp
el
le
e’s
no
n-
co
m
pl
ian
ce
w
ith
th
e
A
P
A.
A
p
pe
lle
es
m
a
y p
rio
ri
tiz
e
the
ir
w
o
rk
in
ter
na
ll
y,
bu
t
c
an
no
t
co
nf
er
criteria-driven
benefits
upon
6
million
pe
op
le
w
it
ho
ut
r
eg
ula
to
ry
ru
le
-m
ak
in
g.
S
ec
on
d,
co
ur
ts ha
ve
co
ns
ist
en
tly
h
eld
th
at
a
co
lo
ra
bl
e
co
ns
tit
ut
ion
a
l
v
io
lat
io
n g
iv
es
ri
se to
a s
ho
w
in
g
o
f i
rre
pa
ra
bl
e
h
ar
m.
“
It
h
as
l
on
g
b
ee
n
e
st
ab
lis
he
d
t
ha
t
th
e
l
os
s
o
f
co
ns
tit
uti
on
al
f
ree
d
om
s,
‘f
or
ev
en
m
in
im
a
l
p
er
iod
s
o
f
tim
e
,
u
nq
ue
st
ion
a
bly
co
ns
tit
ut
es
irr
ep
ar
ab
le
in
ju
ry
.’
“
il
ls
v D
is
tri
ct
o
f
C
ol
um
b
ia,
5
7
F.
3d
1
30
4,
1
31
2
(
D
.C
. Ci
r.
2
00
9
)
(q
uo
tin
g
l
ro
d
v
Bu
rn
s,
42
7
U
.S .
3
4
7,
3
7
3
1
97
6
;
s
ee
als
o
S
e
ret
se
-K
h
am
a
A
s
hc
ro
ft,
21
5
F
.
u
p
p.
2
d
3
7,
53
(D
.D
.C
.
2
0
02
d
ep
riv
a
tio
n
o
f c
o
ns
titu
ti
on
al
pr
ot
ec
tio
n
“i
s
an
un
de
ni
ab
ly
s
ub
st
an
tia
l
an
d
irr
ep
ar
ab
le
h
ar
m
”)
.
Appellant
will
also
s
uf f
er
i
rre
pa
ra
bl
e
in
ju
ry
b
ec
a
us
e o
nc
e
th
e
p
ro
g
ram
s
ar
e
in
ef
fe
ct,
th
ey
w
ill
b
e
ne
ar
ly
im
p
os
si
bl
e
to u
nr
av
el
p
ra
ct
ic
all
y.
R
o
ug
hl
y
6
m
illi
on
pe
rs
on
s
a
ff
ec
te
d w
il
l
ha
ve
an
no
un
c
ed
the
m
se
lv
es
a
s
i
lle
g
all
y in
th
e
c
ou
nt
ry
o
n
a
p
rom
i
se
tha
t
th
ey w
il
l
re
ce
iv
e
im
m
u
ni
ty.
M
il
lio
ns
m
or
e
w
ill
flo
o
d th
e
bo
rd
er
t
o
3
U
S
C
A
as
e
1
4
53
25
D
oc
um
e
nt
15
34
9
07
il
ed
0
1/2
9
/20
1
5
a
g
e
46
of
7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 47 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 47/78
p
l
an
t
“
dr
y f
ee
t
” o
n
U
.S
.
s
o
il
to
b
e
p
a
rt of
t
h
e n
e
x
t p
r
ed
i
c
ta
b
le
w
av
e o
f
a
m
n
es
t
y.
L
e
o
n R
o
d
ñ
qu
e
z
D
ir
e
ct
o
r
of th
e
U
ni
te
d S
ta
t
es
C
it
iz
e
n
sh
i
p a
n
d I
m
m
i
g
ra
ti
o
n
S
e
rv
i
ce
s
, an
n
o
u
n
c
ed to h
i
s
em
p
lo
y
ee
s
i
n
a
to
w
nh
a
ll
m
e
e
ti
ng
t
h
at
:
“
If
t
hi
s
p
ro
g
ra
m
d
oe
s
w
h
a
t
w
e
w
an
t
i
t
to
d
o
,
y
o
u
w
i
ll
n
o
w
ha
v
e
li
te
ra
l
ly
m
il
li
o
ns of
pe
o
p
le
w
ho
w
il
l
be
w
o
rk
in
g
o
n th
e
b
o
o
k
s, p
a
y
in
g
ta
x
e
s,
b
e
in
g
pr
o
d
u
ct
iv
e
. Y
o
u c
a
nn
o
t
so
ea
s
il
y
b
y
f
ia
t
n
o
w
re
m
o
v
e
t
ho
s
e
p
e
op
l
e f
r
om
th
e
economy..
T
h
e
p
r
og
r
a
m
o
rd
e
r
ed
b
y
P
re
s
id
e
nt B
ar
a
c
k
O
b
a
m
a
is
in
te
n
d
e
d
to
s
ub
v
e
rt
C
o
n
g
re
s
s, by
p
r
ev
e
n
ti
n
g C
o
ng
r
e
ss
fr
o
m
l
e
gi
s
la
ti
n
g
in
w
a
y
s
A
p
p
el
la
n
t
s d
i
sa
g
re
e
w
i
th
.
T
h
i
s
i
s a
k
n
ow
in
g
, d
el
ib
e
ra
t
e u
su
r
p
at
io
n
of C
o
n
g
r
es
s
’ l
e
gi
s
la
ti
v
e
r
o
le
.
T
h
ir
d
,
“
th
e
r
e
is
a
n
ov
e
r
ri
d
in
g
pu
b
l
ic in
te
r
es
t
..
in
th
e
g
e
n
e
ra
l i
m
p
o
rt
an
c
e o
f
an
a
g
e
nc
y
’
s f
ai
th
f
u
l
a
d
he
r
e
nc
e
t
o it
s
s
ta
tu
t
or
y m
an
d
a
te
.
”
J
ac
k
s
o
nv
i
ll
e
P
o
rt
A
u
th
A
d
a
m
s
, 55
6
F
.
2
d 5
2
59
D
.
C
.
C
ir
. 1
97
7
.
T
h
e
p
u
b
li
c ha
s
a
s
u
b
s
ta
n
ti
al
i
n
te
re
s
t in
A
p
p
el
la
n
ts
fo
l
lo
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
la
w
. S
ee
e
g
In
r
e
M
ed
i
c
ar
e R
e
im
bu
r
s
em
en
t L
i
ti
g
a
tio
n
4
1
4
f.
3
d
7
1
2
D
.C
.
C
ir.
2
0
0
5
A
d
d
i
ti
on
a
l a
dm
in
i
st
ra
t
iv
e b
u
rd
e
n
“[
w
o
u
ld
J
n
o
t
outweigh the public’s subst
a
nt
ia
l i
n
te
re
s
t
i
n
t
h
e
Se
c
r
et
a
ry
’
s fo
l
lo
w
i
ng
th
e l
a
w
.”
“
O
b
am
a im
m
ig
r
at
io
n c
h
ie
f
s
ay
s
a
m
n
e
st
y d
es
i
gn
e
d t
o
c
e
m
e
n
t il
le
g
a
ls
p
l
ac
e
in
s
o
c
ie
ty
,
” S
t
e
ph
e
n
D
i
n
an
,
T
h
e
W
a
s
hi
n
g
to
n T
i
m
e
s, D
ec
e
m
b
e
r 9
2
01
4
,
h
tt
p
:/
/w
w
w
.w
as
h
in
g
t
on
t
im
e
s
.c
o
m
l
n
ew
s/
2
0
4
/d
e
c
/9
/
oba
m
a
a
m
ne
s
ty
d
es
ig
n
e
d
ce
m
e
n
t
i
lle
g
a
ls
pl
a
ce
so
c
ie
/
U
S
pA
a
s
e 1
4
53
25
D
oc
um
e
nt
15
34
9
07
il
ed
0
1/2
9
/20
1
5
a
g
e 47
o
f
77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 48 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 48/78
S
i
nc
e
A
p
p
e
ll
e
es
’ p
r
o
gr
a
m
s
w
ou
l
d
c
h
an
g
e
t
h
e
s
ta
tu
s
qu
o
a
pr
e
li
m
i
na
r
y
i
n
ju
n
c
ti
o
n s
er
v
e
s th
e
p
ub
l
ic
in
te
r
e
st
.
O
’
D
o
n
n
e
ll C
on
st
.
C
o
D
i
s
tr
ic
t
of
C
o
lu
m
b
i
a
9
63
F
.
2
d 4
20
,
4
2
9
D
.
C
. Ci
r.
1
99
2
“
is
s
ua
n
c
e of
a
p
re
l
im
i
n
ar
y
i
n
ju
n
c
ti
on w
ou
l
d
s
e
rv
e
th
e
pu
bl
ic
’s
in
te
r
e
st in
m
a
in
t
a
in
in
g
a
s
y
st
e
m o
f
la
w
s
” f
re
e
o
f
c
o
n
s
ti
tu
ti
o
na
l
v
i
ol
a
ti
on
s
. S
e
e a
l
so
N
M
ar
ia
n
a
Is
l
an
d
s
U
n
i
te
d
S
t
a
te
s
6
8
6
F
S
u
p
p
. 2
d
7
21
D
.D
.
C
.
2
0
0
9 “
th
e
g
e
ne
r
a
l
p
ub
l
ic
i
n
te
re
s
t
se
r
ve
d
b
y a
g
e
n
ci
e
s’
c
o
m
p
li
a
nc
e w
i
th
the
law” ;
Seretse Khama
Ashcroft,
215
F
Supp.
2d
3
7
5
4
D
.D
.
C
.
2
0
0
2
.
F
o
u
rt
h
A
p
p
e
ll
e
es c
an
n
o
t b
e
“
b
u
rd
e
n
ed
”
b
y a
re
q
u
ir
e
m
e
n
t to
co
m
pl
y w
it
h
e
xi
s
ti
ng l
aw
.
W
h
ile
il
le
g
a
l a
li
en
s
w
o
u
ld
b
e d
ep
o
r
te
d
, t
he
y
h
a
v
e n
o
r
ig
h
t
to
b
e
o
n
U
.S
. so
il.
C
o
ng
r
e
ss h
a
s d
e
te
r
m
i
ne
d
th
a
t
th
e
y
sh
o
u
ld b
e
re
u
n
it
ed
w
it
h t
he
i
r
co
u
n
tr
y
o
f
c
i
tiz
e
n
sh
i
p
U
n
l
es
s
t
h
e J
u
d
ic
i
ar
y
of
f
ic
ia
l
ly
d
e
te
r
m
i
ne
s
so
m
e
c
o
u
nt
ri
e
s to
b
e
i
n
fe
r
io
r
, re
tu
r
n
in
g
t
o o
n
e
’s
o
w
n
c
o
un
t
ry
is
n
ot
,
w
i
th
o
u
t m
o
r
e
, a
n
in
ju
r
y
.
IV
.
D
i
st
ri
c
t
C
ou
r
t E
rr
e
d
in
D
is
m
is
s
in
g f
o
r
L
a
ck
o
f
S
ta
n
d
in
g
A
.
F
o
r
s
ta
n
d
in
g
, o
n
ly
o
n
e b
a
s
is is
s
u
ff
ic
i
en
t
.
In
i
ti
al
ly
, it
is su
f
fi
c
ie
n
t
f
o
r o
n
l
y on
e
p
o
s
si
b
le
t
y
p
e o
f
s
tanding
to
apply with
r
eg
a
rd
to
an
y
p
ar
ti
c
ul
a
r
ac
t
ua
l in
j
ur
y
.
B
y
c
o
n
tr
a
st
d
is
m
i
ss
i
ng
th
e
c
a
s
e f
o
r
la
c
k
o
f
O
f
c
o
u
rs
e C
on
g
r
e
ss
ha
s al
so
pr
o
v
id
e
d m
ec
h
a
n
is
m
s f
o
r p
e
rm
an
e
n
t
o
r
te
m
p
o
r
ar
y
l
aw
fu
l
st
a
tu
s
i
n
h
ar
m
f
u
l si
tu
a
ti
o
n
s,
a
l
lo
w
i
ng
f
or a
s
y
lu
m
,
r
e
fu
g
e
e
st
at
u
s
o
r
t
h
e
l
ik
e
w
h
e
n
n
ec
e
s
sa
ry
.
t
- S
C
A
C
as
e
14
5
32
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t 1
53
4
90
7
P
il
ed
:
01
/2
9/
20
15
Pa
ge
4
8
of 77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 49 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 49/78
st
an
di
ng
re
qu
ir
es
d
em
o
ns
tra
tin
g t
ha
t n
o
po
ss
ib
le g
rou
n
ds f
or
sta
nd
in
g
e
xi
st.
B
.
Th
e
D
is
tri
ct C
ou
rt
an
al
yz
ed
the
f
ac
tu
al
b
as
es
fo
r st
an
din
g
b
y
disbe lieving
Appellant’s
allega tion s
in the
complain
t
r
ath
er
th
a
n
ta
ki
ng
a
s
tr
ue a
ll
al
le
ga
tio
ns o
f fa
ct
an
d
al
l in
fe
ren
ce
s i
n
su
pp
or
t
o
f
sta
nd
in
g
C
ru
ci
al
t
o th
e D
is
tri
ct
C
o
urt
’s
a
na
ly
sis d
ism
i
ss
ing
fo
r
lac
k
o
f s
ta
nd
in
g
w
as
i
ts d
isb
el
ie
f of
S
he
rif
fAr
pa
io
’s
a
ll
eg
at i
on
s,
wh
ic
h
it w
as
o
bli
ga
te
d t
o
a
ssu
m
e t
o
b
e
tr
ue
.
Th
e
D
is
tri
ct C
o
ur
t
ac
kn
ow
le
d
ge
d
th
e
a
lle
ga
ti
on
s:
“The
plaintiff
alleges
that
he
is
“adversely af
fe
cte
d
and
ha
rm
ed i
n
his
o
ffi
ce
’s
fin
an
ce
s
w
o
rk
lo
ad
,
an
d i
nt
er
fer
en
ce
wi
th
t
he
c
on
du
ct
of
h
is
du
ti
es
”
a
s
a
r
es
ul
t of
t
he
“
in
cr
ea
ses
in
the
i
nfl
ux
of
il l
eg
al
al
ie
ns
mo
ti
va
te
d b
y [t
he
se
] p
ol
ic
ies
o
f
off
er
in
g a
m
ne
st
y.”
Co
m
p
i.
2
7.
”
M
e
m
.
p
a
t
19
.
Y
e
t
th
e
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
ur
t
c
ho
se
t
o dis
re
ga
rd
a
nd di
sb
el
iev
e
tho
se
ve
ry
al
leg
at
io
ns
d
es
pi
te a
ck
no
w
le
dg
in
g
A
pp
el
lan
t’
s a
lle
g
ati
on
s:
According
to the
plaint iff , the
“f
in
an
cia
l
impac
t o
f i
lle
ga
l a
lie
ns
in
M
a
ric
op
a
Co
un
ty
A
r
iz
on
a
w
as
at
le
as
t
9
,2
93
,6
19
.9
6 in
th
e
c
os
ts
of
ho
ld
in
g
il l
eg
al
a
lie
ns
i
n
t
he S
h
er
iff
’s
j
ai
ls
f
ro
m
F
eb
ru
ar
y
20
14
th
ro
ug
h
D
ec
em
b
er
17
2
01
4 f
or
th
o
se
in
m
ate
s
f
lag
g
ed
wi
th
IN
S ‘de
ta
in
er
s ”
Pl
.’s R
e
ply
De
fs
.’
O
p
p.
Pl
.’s
M
o
t. P
rel
im
.
I
nj
.
a
t
7
“P
l.’
s
R
ep
ly
”
, E
C
F
No
.
19
.
M
em
.
Op
. at
1
9. T
h
os
e
a
dd
ed
c
os
ts d
ur
ing
20
14
fro
m t
he
20
1
2
D
A
CA
pr
og
ra
m i
s
alone
sufficient
to
establish
standing. Y
e
t th
e
D
is
tri
ct
Co
ur
t
d
isb
el
ie
ve
d
it:
A
s
s
up
po
rt
fo
r
th
is
a
lle
ga
ti
on
h
e
a
lle
ge
s th
at
“
ex
pe
ri
en
ce
ha
s
pr
ov
en
a
s
a
n
em
p
iri
ca
l f
ac
t th
at
m
il
lio
n
s
m
or
e
il
le
ga
l a
lie
ns
w
il
l
b
e
a
ttr
ac
te
d in
to
the
b
o
rd
er
sta
te
s o
f
the
Un
it
ed
S
ta
te
s
re
ga
rd
les
s
of
th
e
s
pe
ci
fic
de
ta
ils
”
o
f
t
he
c
ha
lle
ng
e
d
p
ol
ic i
es
.
C
om
p
i.
3
0
.
M
e
m.
O
p
.
a
t 19
.
Th
e
Di
str
ic
t C
ou
rt
r
ej
ec
ted th
at
em
p
iri
ca
l e
vi
de
nc
e
f
ro
m
S
he
rif
f
35
I
C
ase
1
4
53
2
5 D
o
cu
m
en
t
1
53
4
90
7
il
ed
0
1
/29
/2
01
5
Pa
ge
4
9 of
7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 50 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 50/78
A
rp
ai
o’
s a
ct
ua
l
o
p
era
ti
on
s
as
p
re
d
ict
iv
e
o
f
fu t
ur
e in
ju
ry
. T
he
D
is
tri
ct Co
u
rt
me
re
ly
di
sb
el
iev
e
d
th
is
,
st
at
ing
th
e
ex
ac
t
o
pp
o
si t
e
so
on af
ter
:
“M
o
re
ov
er
t
he p
la
in
tif
fs
al
le
ge
d
in
ju
ry
is l
ar
ge
ly
sp
ec
ul
ati
ve
. T
he
pl
ain
ti
ff a
rg
ue
s th
at
t
he c
ha
lle
ng
ed
de
fe
rre
d a
ct
io
n pro
g
ram
s
w
ill
c
re
ate
a
“
m
ag
ne
t”
b
y
a
ttr
ac
tin
g n
ew
un
d
oc
um
e
nt
ed
im
m
ig
ran
ts i
nt
o
M
ar
ic
op
a C
o
un
ty
so
m
e
o
f
w
h
om m
a
y
co
m
m
it cr
im
es
un
d
er
A
ri
zo
na
l
aw
Pl
.’s
M
o
t a
t
6—
7;
s
ee a
lso
Pl
.’s
M
ot
Ex
.
G
D
ec
i.
of
Sh
er
iff Jo
e
A
rp
aio
— 4
EC
F
N
o.
7
-7.
Y
et
, t
he
d
ec
isi
on
fo
r a
ny in
d
ivi
du
al t
o
m
i
gr
ate
i
s a
co
m
ple
x
d
ec
isi
on wi
th
m
ul
tip
le
fa
cto
rs
,
inc
lu
di
ng f
ac
to
rs e
nt
ire
ly o
uts
id
e th
e
U
n
ite
d S
ta
tes
’ co
n
tro
l,
such
as
social ,
economic
and
political
strife in
a
foreign
country.
Th
e p
la
int
iff
re
du
ce
s
t
hi
s c
om
p
lex
p
ro
ce
ss
to a sin
g
le f
ac
tor
:
t
he
ch
al
le
ng
ed d
e
fer
re
d ac
ti
on
pr
og
ra
ms
.”
M
e
m
.
p
at
2
1. T
hu
s,
r
ath
er
th
an
ta
kin
g
th
e
al l
eg
at
ion
s o
f the
c
om
p
la
int a
s t
ru
e,
a
lo
ng wi
th
al
l i
nf
er
en
ce
s
r
ea
so
na
bl
y
d
ra
wn
t
he
re
fro
m
t
he
D
ist
ric
t
Co
u
rt sp
ec
ula
te
d
as t
o ho
w th
e
al l
eg
at
io
ns m
i
gh
t n
ot
b
e
tru
e
Un
de
r
a
co
rre
ct
a
na
ly
sis of
sta
n
din
g
, if
A
pp
el
lan
ts
’ p
ro
gra
m
s c
au
se e
ve
n
so
m
e
t
hi
rd
pa
rt
y a
cto
rs
to b
e
m
or
e l
ike
ly
to fl
oo
d
M
a
ric
o
pa C
ou
nt
y, A
riz
on
a a
n
d
co
st S
he
ri
ff
rp
ai
o’
s
of
fi
ce
fm
a
nc
ia
l
an
d
m
a
np
ow
e
r
r
es
ou
rc
es
A
pp
el
la
nt
h
as
st
an
di
ng
.
I
t
is
no
t r
eq
ui
re
d
th
at
o
ne
hu
nd
re
d
pe
rc
en
t 1
0
0
) o
f al
l
ill
eg
al
a
lie
ns
be
m
o
tiv
a
ted
s
ol
ely
b
y Ap
p
ell
an
t’
s ne
w
programs.
M
o
reo
v
er th
e
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
ur t
sp
ec
ul
at
ed
a
s
t
o
h
ow
A
p
pe
lle
es
’ pr
og
ra
m
s
m
ig
h
t
no
t ca
us
e h
arm
to the
A
p
pe
lla
nt
.
Co
nt
ra
ry to t
he p
la
int
iff
s
a
ss
er
tio
n tha
t
a
co
ns
eq
ue
nc
e
of
the
c
ha
ll
en
ge
d p
rog
ra
m
s
w
il
l
b
e an
in
cr
ea
se i
n
i
lle
ga
l
co
nd
uc
t
by
çJ
Sç
A Ca
se
1
4 5
3
25
Do
c
um
e
nt 1
53
4
90
7
F
il
ed
: 0
1
/2
9/2
0
15 P
ag
e
5
0
o
f 7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 51 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 51/78
un
do
c
um
e
nte
d
i
m
mi
gr
an
ts
a
nd
an
in
cr
ea
se
in
c
os
ts
to t
he
M
a
ric
op
a C
o
un
ty
Sh
er
if
fs
o
ff
ic
e
th
es
epr
og
ra
m
s m
a
y
h
av
e
th
e
op
po
si
te
ef
fe
ct
.
T
he
d
e
fer
re
d a
ct
io
n
pr
og
ra
m
s a
re
de
sig
n
ed
t
o
inco rporate DHS’s
enforcement
priorities
and
better
focus
fede ra l
en
fo
rc
em
e
nt
o
n re
m
ov
in
g u
nd
oc
um
e
nt
ed i
m
mi
gr
an
ts
co
m
m
itt
in
g
fe
lo
ni
es
an
d
s
er
io
us
m
i
sd
em
e
an
or
cri
m
es
. S
in
ce
t
he
un
d
oc
um
e
nt
ed
im
m
ig
ra
nt
s
e
n
ga
gi
ng in cr
im
in
al
ac
tiv
it
y
a
re t
he
c
au
se
o
f th
e
in
ju
rie
s c
om
p
la
in
ed
ab
o
ut
by t
he
pl
ai
nt i
ff
, th
e
m
o
re
fo
c
us
ed f
ed
er
al
e
ff
or
t to r
em
ov
e th
es
e
ind
iv
id
ua
ls m
ay
e
n
d
u
p
he
lp
in
g
rat
he
r
tha
n
ex
ac
er
ba
tin
g
the h
ar
m
to
th
ep
la
in
tif
f
M
e
m.
O
p.
at
2
4. E
m
p
ha
se
s a
dd
ed
.
Bu
t t
he co
u
rt
w
a
s o
bl
ig
ate
d
to
ta
ke
al
l
inf
er
en
ce
s
i
n A
pp
e
lla
nt
’s fa
vo
r
a
s t
ru
e
no
t
to
im
ag
in
e
ho
w
th
e
al
le
ga
tio
ns
m
ig
ht
n
o
t be
tru
e
.
A
ls
o
th
e
Di
str
ic
t C
ou
rt
di
sb
el
iev
ed th
at
m
o
re i
lle
ga
l
a
lie
ns
w
ill
fo
llo
w
:
A
s
no
te
d
t
he
p
la
int
iff
s
b
ri
ef
ing
ad
m
its
a
s
m
u
ch
: “
m
ill
ion
s
m
or
e
i
lle
ga
l a
lie
ns
w
ill
be
a
ttr
ac
ted i
nt
o th
e
b
o
rde
r s
ta
tes
o
f t
he
United
States
regardless
of
the sp l
details”
of
the
c
ha
lle
ng
e
d
d
e
fer
re
d
a
ct
ion
p
ro
g
ram
s
.
C
o
m
pi.
3
0.”
M
e
m.
O
p.
a
t
27
em
ph
a
sis
in o
ri
gi
na
l.
B
u
t th
e
D
i
str
ic
t Co
u
rt
t
oo
k th
is
p
as
sa
ge
o
ut
o
f
co
n
tex
t, t
ha
t
the
ne
w
am
n
es
ty
pr
og
ra
m
s ar
e i
rre
le
va
nt
.
Ju
dg
e
H
ow
e
ll
ig
no
re
d
th
e
pr
ior
s
tat
em
e
nt
in
C
om
p
lai
nt
29
th
at
. .D
e
fe
nd
an
t
O
b
am
a
’s
ne
w
a
mn
e
sty
program
will
greatly
increase
the
burden
and
disruption
of
the
S
h
er
iff
s d
u
tie
s.”
Sh
er
iff
A
r
pa
io
o
bv
io
us
ly
all
eg
ed
f
rom
his
r
ea
l-w
o
rld
em
p
iri
ca
l e
xp
er
ien
ce
,
t
ha
t
t
he
A
pp
el
lan
t’
s
“n
ew
am
n
es
ty
p
ro
gr
am
” w
ill ca
us
e
m
ill
ion
s
mo
re i
lle
ga
l
a
lie
n
s
to en
te
r
o
r c
ro
ss
t
hr
ou
gh
M
an
co
pa
C
ou
nt
y “
re
ga
rd
le
ss
of th
e
sp
ec
ifi
c de
ta
ils
” o
f
7
U
C
as
e
14
5
32
5
D
o
cu
me
n
t
15
34
9
07
Fi
led
:
01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e
5
1
of
7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 52 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 52/78
t
ho
se pr
og
ra
m
s
S
im
il
arl
y,
on
t
he
q
ue
sti
on
w
he
th
er
th
e
A
pp
el
la
nt’
s
in
ju
rie
s
ar
e
re
dr
es
sab
le
b
y co
ur
t
a
cti
on
fa
vo
ra
bl
e
to
the
Ap
pe
ll
an
t,
the
D
i
str
ic
t
C
ou
rt re
aso
n
ed
fr
om
in
te
r
ali
a
t
he
A
p
pe
lle
es
’
b
ud
ge
ta
ry
re
so
ur
ce
s:
M
o
re
ov
er
t
he
pl
ain
ti
ff
a
ck
no
w
le
dg
es t
ha
t
th
e de
fe
nd
an
ts
on
ly
ha
ve
l
im
ite
d
re
so
ur
ce
s
to
fac
il
ita
te re
m
ov
al
s
ee Hr
g.
Tr
.
at
4
M
e
m
O
p
a
t 2
.
Ho
w
ev
er
, t
he
a
lle
ga
tio
n
s
sh
o
uld
h
av
e
be
en
ta
ke
n
a
s
t
ru
e, w
he
re
t
he
C
om
p
la
in
t
a
lle
g
es :
44
.
T
h
e f
at
al
de
fe
ct
w
ith
De
fe
nd
an
t
O
ba
m
a’
s
fa
ls
e
e
xc
us
e
pr
ete
x
t)
is t
ha
t
the
e
xe
cu
tiv
e b
ra
nc
h
h
a
s n
ot
re
qu
es
te
d
ad
d
iti
on
al
r
es
ou
rc
es
to s
ec
ur
e
t
he
b
or
de
rs
tha
t
Co
ng
re
ss
ev
er
d
e
nie
d.
Th
e
D
is
tr
ict
C
o
ur
t
er
red
by
no
t
ta
ki
ng
as
tru
e
al
l f
ac
tua
l
al l
eg
at
io
ns
an
d
inferences reasonably
drawn
therefrom
as
true
for
the
purposes
the Rule
1
2
b)
1
)
m
oti
on
t
o d
is
m
iss
.
M
or
eo
ve
r
th
e
D
is
tr
ict
C
ou
rt
fa
ile
d
t
o
co
ns
id
er
t
ha
t
th
e A
p
pe
ll
an
ts’
a
lle
ga
ti
on
s
an
d s
w
or
n
de
cl
ar
at
ion
s
s
ta
nd
u
nc
on
tra
v
ert
ed
.
W
h
il
e
Ju
dg
e
H
o
we
ll
in
sis
te
d
i
n o
ra
l a
rg
um
e
nt
tha
t A
p
pe
lla
nt
be
ar
s
th
e b
u
rd
en
p
ro
of
,
sh
e
d
id
n
o
t
pl
ac
e t
hi
s
in
th
e
c
on
te
xt
th
at
no
e
vi
de
nc
e
or
d
ec
lar
at
io
ns
w
er
e p
ro
ff
er
ed
in
r
ep
ly
.
C
A
pp
el
lan
t a
ll
eg
ed
su
ff
ic
ien
t
i
nj
ur
ies
t
o
es
tab
li
sh
st
an
di
ng
It
w
as
n
ot
t
he
rol
e
th
e
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
ur
t
t
o
b
eli
ev
e
o
r
dis
be
li
ev
e
th
e
3
8
S
C
as
e
1
4-
53
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t
1
53
49
0
7
F
ile
d: 0
1
/29
/2
01
5
Pa
ge
52 o
f
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 53 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 53/78
a
lle
g
ati
on
s.
I
f the
A
p
pe
le
es
w
ish
ed
to
co
nt
es
t
the
a
lle
ga
tio
n
s, th
ey
c
ou
ld
h
av
e
d
o
ne
so
by th
ei
r o
w
n
sw
o
rn d
ec
la
ra
tio
ns
or
o
th
er
ev
id
en
ce
B
ut
t
he
y
di
d
n
ot
do
so
S
he
ri
ff A
rp
ai
o’
s a
lle
ga
ti
on
s a
nd
sw
or
n d
ec
la
ra
tio
ns a
ll
eg
e
su
ff
ici
en
t ha
rm
to
hi
s
O
ffi
ce
to e
sta
b
lis
h s
ta
nd
in
g
T
he D
is
tr
ict
C
o
ur
t
w
as
o
bli
ga
te
d
se
e
“
St
an
da
rd
o
f R
e
vi
ew
”
a
bo
v
e
to
ta
k
e
a
s
tr
ue
al
l al
le
ga
tio
ns
o
f
th
e
Co
m
pl
ai
nt
al
on
g
wi
th
al
l
i
nf
er
en
ce
s tha
t
m
a
y b
e d
ra
w
n
fr
om
th
os
e
al
leg
at
io
ns
in
fa
vo
r o
f
fi
nd
in
g
s
ta
nd
in
g,
for
the
purposes
of
a
Rule
12 b l
motion
to
dismiss.
Ap
p
ell
an
t
re
qu
es
te
d
to
p
re
sen
t
li
ve
te
sti
m
on
y,
bu
t
i
n a
M
in
u
te
Or
de
r o
n
D
e
ce
m
be
r
18
2
0
14
a
t
1
0:4
4
E
D
T,
Ju
dg
e H
o
w
ell
de
ni
ed
li
ve
te
st
im
on
y
“a
t
th
is s
tag
e
o
f
t
he
p
ro
ce
ed
in
gs
,
in
op
po
si
tio
n
to
t
he
de
fe
nd
an
ts
’
m
ot
io
n
to
d
ism
i
ss
, th
e
C
o
ur
t n
e
ed
no
t
m
ak
e
a
ny
c
re
di
bi
lit
y
de
te
rm
in
at
io
ns
an
d m
us
t
ac
ce
pt
as
tru
e
the factual
allegations
made
by
the plaintiff.”
T
he
is
tr
ict
C
o
urt
a
ck
no
w
le
dg
ed
S
h
eri
ff
A
rp
aio
’s
a
ll
eg
ati
on
th
at
A
pp
el
lee
s’
p
ro
gr
am
s
“
ca
us
e[s
]
hi
s
o
ff
ic
e
to e
xp
en
d
re
so
ur
ce
s
T
ha
t
ha
rm
“to
ex
pe
nd
re
so
u
rce
s”
is su
ffi
cie
n
t
fo
r sta
n
din
g
:
“
Ul
tim
a
te
ly,
the
pl
ai
nti
ff
s
sta
nd
in
g a
rg
um
e
nt
r
ed
uc
es to
a
si
m
pl
e
generalized
grievance: A
Federal
policy cau
ses
h
is
of
fic
e
to
ex
pe
nd
re
so
ur
ce
s in
a
m
a
nn
er
th
at
h
e d
ee
m
s s
ub
op
ti
m
al.
T
o
ac
ce
pt
su
c
h a b
ro
ad
i
nt
erp
re
ta
tio
n
o
f th
e
in
jur
y
re
qu
ir
em
e
nt
wo
u
ld
p
er
m
it
ne
ar
ly al
l s
ta t
e
o
ffi
ci
als
to
ch
al
le
ng
e
a h
os
t o
f
F
ed
er
al
law
s
s
im
pl
y b
ec
au
se
the
y
d
is
ag
re
e
w
ith h
o
w m
a
ny
—
o
r
h
ow f
ew
—
F
ed
er
al
re
so
urc
es
a
re br
ou
g
ht to
b
ea
r
o
n
lo
ca
l in
te
re
sts
.”
M
e
m
.
O
p.
a
t 20
e
m
ph
as
is
a
dd
ed
.
T
h
us
,
t
he
D
is
tr
ict
Co
u
rt
ac
kn
ow
l
ed
ge
s th
at
3
9
U
S
D
A C
as
e
1
4
53
25
D
oc
u
me
n
t 1
5
34
90
7
P
ile
d: 0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
ag
e
53 o
f
77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 54 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 54/78
th
e
A
pp
el
lan
ts
’
p
rog
ra
m
s c
au
se
S
he
ri
ffA
rp
ai
o’
s
of
fic
e
to
e
xp
en
d
re
so
ur
ce
s
b
ut
co
nf
us
ed s
ta
nd
in
g
w
ith
th
e
u
lt
im
at
e
m
er
its
w
he
th
er
th
e
ne
ga
tiv
e im
p
ac
t
i
s
j
us
tif
ie
d.
T
he
D
is
tri
ct C
o
ur
t a
ls
o
m
is
co
n
str
ue
s
th
e
i
ss
ue
as on
e
o
f “A
F
ed
e
ral
p
ol
ic
y.” T
h
e
D
is
tr
ict
C
o
ur
t
fu
rt
he
r
ac
k
no
wl
ed
ge
d
“T
he
p
la
int
iff c
la
im
s th
a
t
th
e
ch
all
en
ge
d
de
fe
rre
d a
ct
io
n
p
ro
g
ram
s
, w
hi
ch
pr
ov
id
e
gu
id
an
ce
to
F
ed
er
al la
w
e
nf
or
ce
m
en
t re
ga
rd
in
g th
e
rem
o
va
l or
no
n
-re
m
ov
al
o
f
un
do
cu
m
en
te
d
i
mm
i
gr
an
ts
in
hi
bi
t h
is
ab
ili
ty
to pe
rf
or
m
hi
s
off ic ial
functions
as
the
SherffofMaricopa
County.”
M
em
.
p
a
t 1
9
e
m
ph
as
is a
dd
ed
.
Th
a
t a
lle
ga
tio
n
al
on
e i
s s
uf
fic
ie
nt
t
o
e
st
ab
lis
h
s
ta
nd
in
g.
T
he
D
is
tr
ict
C
o
ur
t re
ci
te
d A
p
pe
lla
nt
’s
al
leg
a
tio
n
“t
ha
t th
e
c
h
all
en
ge
d
de
fer
re
d
a
ct
ion
p
ro
gr
am
s
in
hi
bit
hi
s
a
bil
ity to
p
er
fo
rm
h
is
o
ff
ici
al
fu
n
cti
on
s
a
s
t
he
Sh
er
ffo
fM
a
ri
co
pa
C
o
un
ty
.”
I
n h
is
fir
st
D
ec
la
rat
io
n
o
n D
ec
em
b
er
20
14
,
I
A 1
59
-1
89
Sh
er
iff J
oe
A
r
p
ai
o sw
or
e
un
d
er
oa
th
th
at
e
mp
h
as
es
ad
de
d
:
4
If Pr
es
ide
n
t
O
b
am
a
’s
a
m
ne
sty
cr
ea
ted
by
th
e
Pr
es
id
en
t’s
ex
ec
ut
ive or
de
r,
wh
ic
h
wa
s
an
no
u
nc
ed
on
N
ov
em
b
er
20
,
2
01
4,
i
s
all
ow
e
d to
g
o
int
o
e
ff
ec
t,
m
y
S
h
eri
ff
s o
ff
ice
re
sp
on
sib
le
f
or
M
ari
co
pa
C
ou
n
ty ,
A
riz
on
a
, an
d th
e
pe
op
le
o
fM
ar
ic
op
a
C
o
un
ty wi
ll
suffer sign
Ulcant harm.
5
T
his
un
c
on
sti
tu
tio
na
l a
ct
b
y
th
e
pr
es
id
en
t
w
il
l h
a
ve
a s
er
io
us
de
tr
im
en
ta
l
im
p
ac
t
o
n my
ca
rr
yin
g
ou
t
t
he
d
uti
es
a
nd
re
sp
on
si
bi
lit
ies
f
or
w
hic
h
am
c
ha
rg
ed
a
s
s
he
rif
f
40
IJ
SC
A
C
as
e
1
4
5
32
5
D
oc
um
e
nt
1
53
4
90
7
Fi
le
d:
0
1/
29
/2
01
5
Pa
ge
54 o
f
77
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 55 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 55/78
6
S
pe
cif
ic
al
ly ,
Ob
am
a
’s
am
n
es
ty
p
ro
gra
m
wi
ll
se
v
ere
ly
st
rai
n
o
u
r
r
es
ou
rc
es
bo
th
i
n ma
n
po
we
r
an
d
fin
an
c
ial
ly
n
ec
es
sar
y
to
p
ro
tec
t
th
e
ci
tiz
en
s
I w
a
s
e
le
ct
ed
t
o se
rv
e.
7
Fo
r i
ns
tan
c
e,
am
o
ng
th
e
m
an
y
n
eg
at
iv
e
eff
ec
ts o
f t
hi
s
ex
ec
ut
ive
o
rd
er
,
w
ill
be t
he
in
cr
ea
se
d
r
el
ea
se of
cr
im
in
al
a
lie
ns
ba
ck
o
nt
o
str
ee
ts o
f
M
a
ric
op
a C
o
un
ty
,
A
r
izo
na
an
d
the
r
est
of
th
e
n
at
io
n.
8
In
a
dd
it
io
n, t
he
fl
oo
d
o
f
il
leg
al
a
lie
ns
i
nto
A
ri
zo
na
w
il
l
c
o
st m
y
S
he
rif
f’
s
o
ff
ic
e m
on
ey
a
nd
r
es
ou
rc
es
to
ha
nd
le
.
9 A
tt
ac
he
d
to t
he
C
om
p
la
in
t
in t
his
ca
se a
re
s
ev
er
al
ne
w
s re
lea
se
s
from my
office
giving
details
of
the
impacts
in my
jurisdiction.
I
att
ac
h
th
ese
n
e
ws
r
el
ea
se
s a
ga
in
a
s ex
h
ib i
ts
to th
is
D
e
cla
ra
tio
n
, a
n
d
in
co
rp
or
at
e he
re
in
th
e s
ta
te
me
n
ts fr
om
m
y o
ff
ice
in
th
e
a
tta
ch
ed
ne
w
s re
lea
se
s.
I a
ff
irm
th
e
ac
cu
ra
cy
of
t
he
n
ew
s r
ele
as
es
at
ta
ch
ed
.
1
0
P
res
id
en
t
Ob
am
a
’s
Ju
ne 1
5
20
12
, a
m
ne
st
y
f
or
ad
ul
ts
w
ho
a
rri
ve
d
il
le
ga
lly
a
s ch
ild
re
n,
wh
ic
h O
b
am
a
ha
s
c
al
led
D
efe
rr
ed
A
c
tio
n fo
r
Ch
il
dh
oo
d A
rr
iva
ls
D
A
CA
,
h
as
alr
ea
dy
ca
us
ed
an
in
cr
ea
sed
flo
od
o
f
ill
eg
al
al
ien
s
in
to
A
ri
zo
na
in
20
14
.
1
1
T
h
e
inc
re
as
ed
f
low
o
f
il
leg
al
al
ien
s
i
nt
o
U.
S.
bo
rd
er s
ta
tes
ha
s
b
ee
n s
tim
u
la
te
d
b
y
t
he
h
op
e
of
o
bt
ain
in
g
U
.S
. ci t
iz
en
sh
ip
be
ca
u
se
o
f
P
re
si
de
nt
O
ba
m
a’
s
si
x
6
y
ea
rs o
f
pr
om
is
in
g
a
m
ne
sty
to
th
os
e w
ho
m
a
ke
i
t
to
th
e
U
ni
te
d St
ate
s.
1
2
T
he
in
cr
ea
se
d f
lo
w
o
f i
lle
ga
l a
li
en
s
h
as
ca
us
ed
a s
ig
nf
Ic
an
t
in
cr
ea
se i
n
p
ro
pe
rt
y
da
m
ag
e,
cr
im
e,
a
nd
b
ur
de
ne
d
re
so
ur
ce
s in
lia
ric
o
pa
C
ou
nt
y,
th
ro
ug
h
ou
t A
r
izo
n
a
an
d
a
cr
os
s
t
he
bo
rd
er
reg
io
n
.
13
L
an
do
w
ne
rs re
p
ort
l
ar
ge
s
ca
le
tre
sp
as
sin
g
o
n
t
he
ir l
an
d
by ill
eg
al
al i
en
s
tr
an
si
tin
g
fr
om
th
e
b
o
rd
er i
nt
o t
he
in
te
rio
r
of t
he
co
u
ntr
y,
a
ss
oc
iat
ed
w
it
h
d
es
tr
uc
tio
n o
f
p
ro
pe
rty
the
ft
,
cr
im
es
of i
nt
im
id
at
ion
,
tre
sp
as
si
ng
an
d
dis
ru
pt
io
n
o
f u
si
ng
th
ei
r la
n
d.
14
T
h
e S
he
rif
fs
of
fic
e
w
it
ne
ss
es
a
nd
ex
pe
ri
en
ce
s
a n
ot
ice
ab
le
i
nc
re
ase i
n
cr
im
e
w
i
thi
n
m
y
ju
ris
di
ct
ion
in
M
ar
ico
p
a
Co
u
nty
,
41
S
Ca
se
1
4
53
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t
1
5
34
90
7
F
il
ed
:
01
/2
9/
20
15
P
ag
e 5
5 o
f
7
7
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 56 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 56/78
A
ri
zo
na
r
es
ult
in
g
f
ro
m
ill
eg
al a
li
en
s c
ro
ss
in
g
o
ur
N
a
tio
n’
s
bo
rd
er
an
d e
nt
er
in
g a
nd
cr
os
si
ng
th
ro
ug
h
b
or
de
r St
at
es.
15
Within
my
jurisdiction
my
office
must
respond
to
all
such
re
po
rt
s
a
nd
in
v
es t
ig
ate
.
16
M
y de
pu
ti
es
m
us
t be
o
ut
on
th
e
s
tr
ee
ts
ris
ki
ng
the
ir
l
ive
s t
o
po
li
ce
the
C
o
un
ty
.
A
nd
:
18
I
fo
un
d
o
ut
tha
t o
v
er 4,
00
0
ille
g
al
al i
en
s w
er
e
i
n
o
ur
j
ail
s
o
ve
r
the
last
months
arrested
for
committing
crimes
in
Maricopa
C
o
un
ty
un
de
r
Ar
iz
on
a
l
aw
,
su
ch
a
s c
hi
ld m
ol
es t
at
io
n
b
ur
gl
ar
y
sh
op
li
fti
ng
th
ef
t,
e
tc
.
1
9
I f
ou
nd
th
at
o
n
e th
ir
d o
f th
e
4
00
0
ill
eg
al al
ien
s
ar
re
ste
d
in
M
ar
ic
op
a C
ou
n
ty ha
d
al r
ea
dy
b
e
en
a
rre
st
ed p
re
vi
ou
sl
y f
or ha
v
ing
co
m
mi
tte
d
d
iff
er
en
t cr
im
e
s
e
arl
ie
r
wi
th
in
M
an
co
p
a C
ou
n
ty un
d
er
A
riz
on
a
law
.
20
These
are
criminals
whom
I
turned
ov er
to
ICE
for
depor ta tion
ye
t
th
ey
w
er
e o
bv
io
us
ly
no
t
de
po
rte
d
or w
er
e d
ep
or
te
d
a
nd
ke
pt
re
tur
ni
ng t
o t
he
U
ni
te
d S
ta
te
s.
A
nd
:
2
3
I a
m a
w
are
t
ha
t th
e
Pr
es
ide
nt c
la
im
s th
a
t h
e m
us
t
g
ra
nt
am
ne
st
y
to il l
eg
al
al i
en
s
b
ec
a
us
e
o
f
a la
ck
of re
so
ur
ce
s fo
r
en
fo
rc
in
g
th
e
im
m
ig
ra
tio
n
law
s
.
2
4
H
ow
e
ve
r
f
ro
m
my
p
er
sp
ec
tiv
e a
nd
ex
p
er i
en
ce
th
e
F
ed
era
l
g
ov
er
nm
e
nt i
s s
im
p
ly
s
in
th
e b
u
rde
n a
nd
th
e e
xp
en
se
t
o th
e
S
ta
te
s a
nd
th
e
C
o
un
tie
s an
d
Co
un
ty
o
ff
ic
es su
ch
as
mi
ne
.
In hi
s
su
pp
le
me
nt
al D
ec
la
ra
tio
n
da
ted
De
ce
m
be
r 19
2
01
4
,
JA
65
4
-7
04
S
h
er
iff
Jo
e
A
r
pa
io
s
w
or
e
u
n
de
r oa
th
e
m
ph
as
is a
d
de
d
:
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 57/78
V
SCA
a
se 1
4 53
25
Do
cum
ent
1 5
349
07
Filed
:
0
1/29
/201
5
a
ge
5
7
of 77
30
I f
ou
nd
t
ha
t
o
ve
r o
ne
-th
ir
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 58 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 58/78
d
o
ve
r 40
0
o
f t
he
se
1 20
0 il
le
ga
l
a
lie
ns
ar
res
te
d rec
en
tl
y
in
M
a
ri
co
pa
Co
u
nty
ha
d alr
ea
dy
[be
en]
ar r
es
te
d b
y
m
y
O
ff
ic
e in
th
e p
as
t f
or
co
m
m
itt
ing d
if
fe
ren
t cr
im
es
earlie r
within Maricopa
County
under Arizona
law.
3
1 Th
es
e a
re c
rim
in
al
s w
ho
m
tu
rn
ed o
ve
r
to IC
E
fo
r de
po
rt
at
ion
y
et th
e
y w
e
re no
t d
ep
or
ted a
nd
s
til
l
c
om
m
it
tin
g
cri
m
ina
l
ac
ts
in
M
a
ric
o
pa
C
ou
nt
y.
A
nd
:
33
I a
m aw
a
re
tha
t an
Im
m
ig
ra
tio
n En
fo
rc
em
e
nt
R
e
po
rt fo
r th
e
fiscal
year
of
2013,
by
ICE
indicates
that ICE
reported 722,000
e
nc
ou
nt
er
s
w
it
h
i
lle
ga
l
al
ien
s
m
o
st o
f
w
h
om ca
m
e
to the
ir
at
ten
ti
on
a
ft
er
in
ca
rce
ra
tio
n f
or
a
l
oc
al a
rr
es
t.
34
I
am
a
lso
aw
a
re t
ha
t th
e IC
E
o
ff
ic
ial
s fo
llo
w
ed t
hro
u
gh
w
it
h
i
m
m
igr
at
io
n c
ha
rg
es f
or o
nl
y 19
5
00
0 o
f
the
se in
d
ivi
du
al
s.
A
m
on
g
th
o
se
r
el
ea
se
d by
IC
E
,
6
8
,00
0 h
ad
cri
m
in
al
c
o
nv
ict
io
ns
,
a
nd 3
6 0
0
7
of
t
he
co
nv
ic
te
d il
leg
a
l al
ien
s f
re
ed
fr
om IC
E
cu
sto
d
y, in
m
a
ny
in
st
an
ce
s ha
d m
u
lti
pl
e co
nv
ic
tio
n
s,
so
me
of
w
hi
ch in
clu
d
ed
:
homicide, sexual
assault,
kidnapping, aggravated
assault
stolen
ve
hi
cle
s, d
an
ge
ro
us dr
ug
s
dru
n
k or d
ru
gg
ed d
riv
in
g, an
d
fli
gh
t/e
sc
ap
e.
4
0) I
a
m
a
w
ar
e th
at
M
a
ric
op
a Co
un
ty
in
cu
rre
d an
ad
d
iti
on
al
9
,2
93
,6
19
.9
6
fr
om
Fe
br
ua
ry 1
2
01
4
th
ro
ug
h
D
ec
em
b
er
17 20
14
f
or inm
a
te
s
fla
gg
e
d
w
ith
INS d
e
tai
ne
rs
.
Ex
h
ib i
t
3
.
A
ls
o t
he
A
p
pe
ll
an
t
all
eg
ed o
ri
gi
na
lly
i
n th
e
C
om
p
la
in
t:
E
m
ph
as
es a
dd
ed
)
25
: “
Pr
esi
de
nt
O
b
am
a g
rou
n
ds h
is
arg
u
me
n
t fo
r g
ra
nt
ing
am
n
es
ty
by E
x
ec
ut
ive
O
rd
e
r
to ill
eg
al
a
lie
ns o
n
the
fe
de
ra l
g
ov
e
rn
me
nt
h
av
in
g
i
ns
uf
fic
ie
nt
r
es
ou
rc
es to p
ro
se
cu
te a
nd
de
po
rt
all
o
f
t
he
ille
g
al
ali
en
s
th
at th
e
ex
ec
ut
iv
e
b
ra
nc
h h
as a
llo
w
ed
in
to th
e
c
ou
nt
ry
.”
Q
C
as
e 1
4
5
32
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
9
07
Re
d
: 0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
ag
e
58
of 7
7
2
6
:
“
n
fa
ct
D
ef
en
da
nt
O
ba
m
a’
s
am
n
es
t
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 59 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 59/78
ro
g
ram
s
me
re
ly
s
hi
ft
th
e
b
ur
de
n
t
o
the
S
ta
tes
a
nd
l
oc
al g
ov
e
rn
me
nt
s
cre
at
in
g
sev
e
re
b
urd
e
ns
a
nd
a
c
rim
e
w
av
e
in St
ate
s
a
lon
g
th
e
b
or
de
r.”
2
7:
“
P
lai
nt
iff
Jo
e
A
rp
ai
o is
ad
v
ers
el
y
af
fe
cte
d
a
nd
h
ar
me
d
in h
is
o
ff
ice
’s
f
m
an
ce
s
w
o
rk
lo
ad
a
nd
in
te
rf
ere
n
ce
w
it
h t
he
c
on
du
ct
o
f h
is
d
ut
ie
s
by th
e f
ai
lu r
e
of
th
e
ex
ec
ut
iv
e b
ra
nc
h
t
o en
fo
rc
e
e
xi
st i
ng
i
mm
i
gr
ati
on
la
ws
bu
t
h
as
be
en
se
ve
re
ly
aff
ec
te
d
by i
nc
re
as
es
in th
e
in
flu
x
of il l
eg
al
a
lie
ns
m
o
tiv
at
ed
by
D
ef
en
da
nt
O
ba
m
a’s
po
li
cie
s
of
o
ffe
rin
g
a
m
ne
st
y I
n
th i
s
re
ga
rd
a
s
de
tai
le
d
in
Ex
hi
bi
ts
a
nd
to
th
is
C
om
p
lai
nt
w
h
ich
is
inc
o
rpo
ra
te
d
h
er
ei
n fo
r
re
fe r
en
ce
P
la
in
tif
f
A
rp
ai
o h
as b
ee
n
se
ve
re l
y
a
ffe
ct
ed
a
nd d
a
ma
g
ed
b
y
D
e
fe
nd
an
t
Obama’s
release
of
cr iminal
aliens on to the
streets
ofMancopa
Co
un
ty
A
ri
zo
na
.
Th
is
p
ri
o
r da
ma
g
e w
ill
b
e se
ve
re
ly
in
cr
ea
se
d
b
y
vi
rtu
e
o
f
D
ef
en
da
nt
O
b
am
a
’s
E
x
ec
uti
ve
O
rd
er
o
f
No
v
em
b
er
20
20
14
w
hi
ch
is
t is
su
e.”
2
8:
“
Th
us
th
e
Of
fic
e o
f
th
e
S
he
rif
f
ha
s
b
ee
n d
ir
ec
tly
h
a
rm
ed an
d
im
p
ac
te
d
ad
v
ers
el
y
by
O
ba
m
a’
s D
AC
A
pr
og
ra
m
an
d
w
ill
be
sim
i
lar
ly
ha
rm
e
d
b
y his n
e
w
E
xe
cu
ti
ve
O
rd
e
r
e
ff
tc
tiv
el
y g
ra
nt
ing
a
mn
es
ty
to
il
leg
a
l
a
li
en
s.”
2
9:
“
D
ef
en
da
nt
Ob
a
ma
’s
pa
st
p
ro
m
ise
s of
am
n
es
ty
a
n
d
hi
s
D
A
C
A
a
mn
es
ty
h
av
e d
ire
ct
ly
b
ur
de
ne
d
a
n
d
i
nt
er
fer
ed
w
ith
th
e
op
er
at i
on
s
of
th
e
S
he
ri
ffs
O
f
fic
e
a
ndD
e
fe
nd
an
t
O
b
am
a
‘s
n
ew
am
n
es
ty
p
ro
gr
am
w
il
t
gr
ea
tly
inc
re
as
e
th
e
b
ur
de
n
a
n
d
dis
ru
pt
io
n
o
f th
e
Sh
e
rff
’s
d
ut
ies
”
3
0: “F
ir
st
e
xp
er
ie
nc
e
ha
s
p
rov
e
n
a
s a
n
e
m
pir
ic
al
fac
t th
at
mi
lli
on
s
m
o
re
ill
eg
al
a
lie
ns
wi
ll
be
att
ra
cte
d i
nt
o
th
e
bo
rd
er
s
ta
tes
o
f
th
e
U
n
ite
d
States
regardless
of
the specific details
3
1
:
“S
ec
o
nd
th
e
e
xp
er
ie
nc
es
a
nd
rec
o
rd
s o
f th
e S
he
rif
fs
o
ff
ice
s
ho
w t
ha
t m
an
y
il l
eg
al
al
ie
ns
a
s
di
st
inc
t
f
ro
m
l
aw
a
bi
di
ng
H
is
pa
ni
c
A
m
e
ric
an
s
ar
e
re
pe
at
of
fe
nd
er
s
su
c
h
th
at A
pp
el
lan
t
Ar
pa
io
’s
d
ep
ut
ie
s
an
d
o
th
er
law
en
fo
rc
em
e
nt
of
fi
cia
ls
ha
ve
ar r
es
te
d th
e
sa
m
e
ill
eg
al a
lie
ns f
or
v
ar
io
us
di
ffe
re
nt c
ri
me
s
”
45
S
C
ase
1
4
53
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t
1
53
49
07
F
ile
d
: 0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
a
ge
59
of
7
7
32
:
“
Pl
ai
nti
ff
A
rpa
io
ha
s
tu
rne
d
i
lle
ga
l al
ien
s
w
ho
h
av
e
co
m
mi
tte
d
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 60 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 60/78
cr i
m
es
ov
er
t
o
IC
E
to
tal
in
g
4
0
00
c
ri
m
ina
ls i
n
h
is
jai
ls
fo
r s
tat
e
cr
im
es
in ju
st
a
n
e
ig
ht
m
on
th
p
er
io
d.
H
ow
e
ve
r
o
ve
r
3
6 pe
rce
n
t
ke
ep
coming
back.”
O
bv
io
us
ly
a te
nd
en
cy
t
ow
a
rd
c
ri
m
e
kn
ow
s
n
o
na
tio
n
ali
ty
ra
ce
e
th
ni
ci
ty
e
tc.
Y
e
t
a
s
an i
nf
er
en
ce
th
e
C
ou
rt m
u
st t
ak
e
as
t
ru
e
a
d
e
mo
n
str
at
ed
w
il
lin
gn
es
s
to
ap
p
ly
fo
r
leg
a
l im
m
ig
ra
tio
n
sta
tu
s
in
v
es
tin
g
ti
m
e
an
d ex
pe
ns
e
i
s
a so
un
d
pr
ed
ic
tor
of
a
res
pe
ct
fo
r th
e
l
aw
s
of t
he
U
nit
ed
S
tat
es
a
re
lu
cta
nc
e
t
o
p
u
t
at ris
k
w
h
at
o
ne
ha
s
al
rea
dy
in
v
es
ted
a
nd
a
re
ve
re
nc
e
fo
r th
e
U
ni
te
d S
ta
tes
as a
ne
w h
om
e
p
os
sib
ly
g
re
at
er
th
an t
ha
t
of
na
ti
ve
b
or
n
cit
iz
en
s.
By c
o
ntr
as
t a
d
em
o
ns
tr
ate
d
w
illi
ng
ne
ss
t
o
br
ea
k th
is
na
tio
n’
s
la
w
s
to
ge
t
w
h
at
o
ne
w
an
ts
bu
t
is n
ot
en
ti
tle
d
t
o e
x
pe
rie
nc
in
g
a
w
id
es
pre
ad
o
u
tcr
y
ex
cu
si
ng
their
law breaking
and
suffer ing
no
consequences constitute valid
grounds
for
pre
d
ict
in
g
a
lo
w
er
ed
re
sis
ta
nc
e
t
o
b
re
ak
in
g
m
or
e
law
s
.
T
he
Ju
dic
ia
ry
is
tr
ad
it
ion
al
ly
h
igh
ly
se
ns
iti
ve
t
o di
sco
u
rag
in
g
re
pe
at
l
aw
b
re
ak
in
g.
D
T
he
D
is
tr
ict
Co
u
rt
a
na
ly
ze
d
th
e
fa
ct
ua
l b
as
es
fo
r
A
p
pe
lla
nt
’s
s
ta
nd
in
g
b
y
re
je
cti
ng
S
h
eri
ffA
rp
ai
o’
p
re
di
ct
ion
of f
ut
ur
e
ha
rm
gr
ou
nd
ed
in
p
a
st
e
m
pi
ric
al
e
xp
er
ie
nc
e.
Th
e
D
is
tri
ct
C
ou
rt
r
eje
ct
ed
ha
rm
fr
om
p
a
st
ac
tio
n
s
a
s
a
n
em
p
ir
ica
l
ba
si
s
for
p
red
ic
ti
ng
fu
tu
re
o
r
in
cre
as
ed
h
ar
m
.
S
ee
M
em
.
O
p.
at
1
8
19
2
1.
I
f s
uc
h
a
n
a
na
ly
sis
w
e
re
ad
o
pte
d
it
w
ou
ld
era
d
ica
te
n
ea
rly
a
ll c
it
ize
n
c
ha
lle
n
ge
s
t
o
e
nv
ir
on
m
en
ta
l
re
gu
la
tio
ns
a
ri
ch
fi
eld
.
B
ut
p
red
ic
ti
on o
f
fu
tu
re
i
nj
ury
fr
om
4
6
U
S C
A
C
ase
14
532
5 D
ocu
men
t 15
3490
7
P
iled:
01
/29/2
015
Page
60 of
77
emp
iric
al
e
vide
nce
of p
ast ha
rm
is the
main
stay
of
s
tand
ing
fo
r envi
ronm
enta
l
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 61 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 61/78
reg
ulat
ions
W
ithou
t p
redi
ction
s
fro
m
p
ast ex p
erien
ce
near
ly all
re
gula
tory
l
itiga
tion
wou
ld
c
ease
to
ex
ist.
A
ne
w e
nvir
onm
ental
regu
lati
on a
llow
ed
the
E
nviro
nme
ntal P
rote
ction
Agen
cy “E
PA”
t
he
op
tion
yet
not
th
e
c
er ta
inty,
of ap
prov
ing a
ltern
at iv
e
met
hods
“n
ot
less
str
inge
nt”
tha
n prior
r
egul
ation
s:
“According
to
NRDC the
Guidance
ex ace rbates
these
i
njuri
es
by dela
ying
or
susp
endi
ng
futu
re
ai r
qua
lity
im
prov
em e
nts
A
ny
su
ch eff
ec t,
EPA
c
ount
ers,
is
p
urely
hy
poth
etic
al
beca
use
it
may
nev
er
ap
prov
e a
n
alte
rnati
ve.”
Natu
ral
Re
sour
ces
D
efen
se
C
ounc
il
E
nvi
ronm
enta
l
P
rotec
tion
Age
ncy
, 643
F
.3d
3
D.C.
C
ir. J
uly
1 20
11 .
I
n tha
t c
ase
t
he
p
lain
tiff
N
RDC
cla
imed th
at
m
em
be rs liv
ing
in ai
r qua
lity
non
-atta
inm
ent ar
eas
mig
ht be h
arm
ed
b
y
a
ir q
ualit
y
Th
e
EPA
obje
cted
that it
was
sp
ecu
lativ
e
to co
nclu
de
th
at
“G
uida
nce
” allo
wing
a
“n ot
less s
tring
en t”
alt
erna
tive
fo
r
at
taini
ng
ai r
q
ualit
y c
ou ld
cau
se
h
arm.
Neve
rthe
less
the
D
.C .
Circ
uit f
ound
th
at t
he
N
RD
C
h
ad
stand
ing
to ch
allen
ge th
e
EP
A’s
agen
cy a
ctio
n. Tha
t
regulation might allow
th
ird
part
ies
acting
inde
pend
entl
y from
the
EPA
,
to
use
e
nvir
onm
ental p
rote
ction
tech
niqu
es
“n
ot
l
ess str
inge
nt”
than
b
efor
e.
Plai
ntiff
s
a
lleg
ed that
new t
echn
ique
s w
oul
d be
in
crem
ent
ally
m
ore po
lluti
ng
Fur
ther
, ac
cord
ing
to th
e D
.C.
C
ircu
it, on
ly
a parti
al
co n
trib
ution m
ak in
g
a
47
Ca
se
14
-5
32
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
9
07
P
ile
d:
0
1/
29
/2
01
5
P
ag
e
6
1 o
f
7
7
p
ro
ble
m
wo
rs
e
i
s s
uff
ic
ie
nt
fo
r
sta
nd
in
g.
Id
A
l
so
,
m
ak
in
g
an
e
xi
st i
ng
pr
ob
le
m
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 62 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 62/78
w
or
se
e
st
ab
lis
he
s
sta
n
din
g
.
I
d
“
In
an
y ev
en
t,
ev
e
n a
ss
um
i
ng
th
at
a
r
es
ul
tin
g
pr
og
ra
m
w
er
e
pe
rf
ec
tly
e
qu
iv
al
en
t t
he
d
el
ay
in
im
p
ro
vi
ng
ai
r
qu
al
ity
w
o
ul
d
sti
ll
in
jur
e
N
R
DC
m
em
b
er
s.”
Id
S
o
d
el
ay
in
i
m
pro
v
em
e
nt
is
su
ff
ic
ien
t
in
jur
y
fo
r
sta
n
din
g
i
f em
it
tin
g
fac
il
itie
s
m
ig
ht
o
r m
ig
ht
no
t
u
se th
e
a
lte
rn
at
iv
e
te
ch
ni
qu
es
.
L
ik
ew
is
e
i
n N
a
tu
ra
l
R
es
D
ef
C
o
un
ci
l
En
vt
L F
ro
t.
A
g
en
cy
D
.C
.
Ci
r. ,
C
as
e
N
os
.
9
8
—
13
79
9
8—1429
98—143
1
June
27
2014 ,
NRDC’s
plaintiff
m
em
b
er
s
l
iv
ed
n
ea
r
th
ir
d-p
a
rty
i
nd
ep
en
d
en
t
a
ct
or
po
w
er
pl
an
ts
th
at
m
i
gh
t
co
n
ce
iva
b
ly
sw
it
ch t
o
ne
w
f
ue
ls
:
“
On
c
e E
P
A
p
ro
mu
lg
at
ed
th
e C
o
m
pa
ra
ble
F
ue
ls
Ex
c
lus
io
n
it
w
as
“a h
a
rdl
y-
sp
ec
ul
ati
ve
e
xe
rc
ise
in
na
ke
d
ca
pit
al
ism
’
“t
pr
ed
ic
t
th
at
fac
il
iti
es
w
ou
ld
ta
ke
ad
va
n
tag
e o
f
it
to
b
ur
n
ha
za
rd
ou
s-
w
ast
e-
derived
fue ls
rather than
more
e
xp
en
si
ve
fo
ss
il f
ue
ls
.
Id
inf
er
rin
g
t
ha
t
“
mo
to
r
c
ar
rie
rs
w
ou
ld
r
es
po
nd
to
t
he
h
o
ur
s-i
nc
re
as
ing
p
rov
is
io
ns
by
r
eq
ui
rin
g
t
he
ir
d
riv
e
rs
to
u
se
t
he
m
a
nd
wo
rk
lon
g
er
d
a
ys
”
qu
ot
ing
A
b
iga
il A
lli
an
ce
r
B
ett
er
A
cc
es
s
t
o D
ev
el
op
m
en
ta
l
D
rug
s
E
sc
he
n
ba
ch
4
69
F.3
d
1
29
1
35
D.
C.
C
i
r. 2
00
6
.
A
n in
fe
re
nc
e
p
red
ic
tin
g
ha
rm
fr
om
ag
en
cy
ac
tio
n
w
as s
uf
fic
ie
nt
to
c
on
st
itu
te
standing.
Standing existed from
a
prediction about
“a
hardly-speculative exerc ise
in
na
ke
d
c
ap
ita
li
sm
”
th
at
t
hi
rd-
pa
rt
y
pr
iva
te
ac
to
rs
in th
e
e
n
erg
y
i
nd
us
tr
y,
a
cti
ng
in
de
pe
n
de
ntl
y
wo
ul
d s
w
itc
h
to
l
es
s-
ex
pe
ns
iv
e
ha
za
rd
ou
s-
w
as
te-
de
ri
ve
d
f
ue
ls
. Th
e
re
gu
la
tio
n
d
id
n
ot
ma
nd
a
te
th
at
an
y
pr
iv
ate
co
m
pa
ny
sw
it
ch
fue
ls
.
Th
e
r
eg
ul
at
ion
48
U
S
CA
Ca
se
1
4
53
25
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
9
07
F
il
ed
:
0
1/2
9
/2
01
5
Pa
ge
62 o
f 7
7
ha
d
n
o
t y
et
go
ne i
nt
o
e
ff
ec
t,
so
o
n
ly
p
re
di
cti
on
w
a
s
po
ss
ib
le.
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 63 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 63/78
F
u
rth
er
th
e
D
.C
.
C
i
rcu
it
c
on
sid
er
ed
w
h
et
he
r
an
yo
ne
e
lse
wo
ul
d
h
av
e
s
tan
d
ing
:
“W
e
re
E
P
A
to
p
re
va
il
a
lth
ou
g
h
N
R
D
C
m
i
gh
t
w
el
l
h
av
e
sta
nd
in
g
to
b
ri
ng
a
n
a
s
ap
pl
ied
ch
al
le
ng
e
to a
ny
p
art
ic
ula
r
‘n
ot
le
ss
s
tri
ng
en
t’
d
ete
rm
in
a
tio
n
no
o
ne
wo
u
ld
ha
ve
st
an
di
ng
t
o
ch
al
len
ge
E
P
A’
s a
ut
ho
rit
y
to
al
lo
w
al
ter
na
tiv
es
in
th
e
fi
rs
t
p
lac
e.
E
s
pe
cia
ll
y
g
iv
en th
a
t
C
o
ng
re
ss
en
a
cte
d
S
ub
p
art
2
fo
r th
e
v
er
y
pu
rp
os
e
o
curtailing EPA discretion see
Am
Truck ing,
531
U.S .
at
484 86
121
.
Ct
.
90
3
, it
w
o
uld
be
iro
n
ic
i
nd
ee
d
th
e ap
pl
ica
ti
on
o
s
tan
d
ing
d
oc
tr
ine
al
lo
we
d
E
P
A
to
eff
ec
tiv
e
ly
m
a
in
ta
in
th
at
ve
ry
di
sc
ret
io
n.
N
ei
the
r
pr
ec
ed
en
t
no
r
l
og
ic
r
eq
ui
re
s u
s
to
ad
op
t
su
c
h
a c
ou
nt
er
int
ui
tiv
e
ap
pr
oa
ch
to
s
ta
nd
in
g.”
Id
A
n
in
ju
ry
co
ns
tit
ut
ing
st
an
din
g
n
ee
d
no
t
be
a
n
a
ll
or
n
oth
in
g
eff
ec
t.
A
lle
ga
tio
n
s
th
at
ev
en
j
us
t on
e
ci
tiz
en
’s
v
ot
e
m
ig
ht
b
e
d
ilu
te
d
is
s
uff
ic
ien
t.
Di
lu
tio
n
c
an
n
ev
er
b
e
kn
o
wn
f
or
ce
rt
ain
.
B
ak
er
C
a
rr
3
6
9 U
.S
.
18
6
2
05
,
8
2
S
C
t 6
91
,
7
L
.E
d.
2d
66
3
19
6
2)
e
xp
la
in
ed
:
H
av
e
th
e
ap
pe
lla
nt
s
a
lle
ge
d
s
uc
h
a
p
er
so
na
l
s
ta
ke
i
n t
he
ou
tco
m
e
o
t
he
co
n
tro
ve
rs
y
a
s t
o
a
ssu
re
th
at
c
on
cr
et
e
ad
ve
rs
en
es
s
which sharpens
the
presentation
o
issues
u
po
n
w
h
ic
h t
he
co
u
rt
so
la
rg
el
y
d
ep
en
ds
fo
r
il
lum
i
na
tio
n
o
d
iff
ic
ul
t
c
on
sti
tu
tio
na
l
q
ue
st
io
ns
?
T
his
i
s
the
gis
t
o
th
e
q
ue
st
io
n
o
sta
nd
in
g.
I
t
is
o
c
ou
rs
e,
a
q
ue
st
ion
o f
ed
er
al
l
aw
.
Th
e
c
om
p
lai
nt
w
a
s
fil
ed
b
y
re
si
de
nt
s
o
D
av
id
so
n
H
am
i
lto
n
4
9
USC
A
Cas
e
1
4 5
325 Do
cume
nt
15
3490
7
Fil
ed:
01/
29/2
015
Pa
ge 63 of 7
7
Kn
ox,
Mo
ntgo
mer
y
and
Sh
elby
Co
unti
es . E
ach
is
a
per
son
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 64 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 64/78
al l
eged
ly
qua
lifie
d to vo
te for
m
emb
ers
o
f the
G
ene
ral A
ssem
bly
repre
sen
ting
his
co
unty
.23
I
d.
E
.
T
he Dis
trict
Co
urt anal
yzed
App
ella
nt’s
s
tand
ing in
term
s
of
“
redr
essa
bility
” f
rom favo
rabl
e
cou
rt
actio
n a
lthou
gh
cu rr
en t g
ove
rning
la
w r
equi
res
all ille
gal ali
e ns to
b
e
dep
orted
The U.
S. D
istri
ct co
nclu
ded th
at
Ap
pell
ant does
not h
ave
stan
ding
in te
rms
of
“redressability.”
Mem .
p
at
25-29 .
Tha t
is,
if
the
Cour t
granted
Plaintiffs’
Mot
ion fo
r Pre
limi
nary
Inju
ncti
on an
d/or
g
rant
ed
j
udgm
ent
on
th
e Co
mpl
aint
the
Cou
rt’s act
ion fav
orab
le
to
App
ella
nt
w
ould not
red
uce
Ap
pella
nt’s in ju
ry .
Bu
t Me
ndo
za
Pe
rez
D .C
. Cir.
,
Re
cord
No.
13-5
11
8
P
age
9 June
13
201
4 ex
plain
s:
“
The requ
irem
ents fo
r
sta
ndin
g d
iffer
whe
re as
her
e, plain
tiffs
seek to
en
forc
e
proc
edur
al
ra th
er t
han
s
ubst
anti
ve righ
ts.
Wh
en
plain
tiffs
ch all
enge
an
a
ctio
n t
aken
wi
thou
t re
quir
ed
proc
edu
ral
sa
fegu
ards
they
m
ust e
stab l
ish the
ag
enc
y a
ct io
n th
reate
ns
the
ir
co
ncre
te in
tere
st.
Fla.
A
udub
on Soc’
y 94
F.3
d at
66
4.
It is
no t
e
noug
h to
as
sert
“a m
ere gene
ra l
inter
est
in
th
e all
eged
p
roce
dura
l
v
iolat
ion
com
mon to
a
ll
m
em b
ers
of
the pub
lic.”
Id
.”
Once
that
thre
shol
d
is
satis
fied
th
e n
orm
al
stan
dar
ds fo
r
im
med
iacy
an
d
redr
essa
bilit
y
are rela
xed.
Luja
n 504
U
.S.
at 572
n.7. P
la in
tiffs
n
eed
no
t dem
on st
rate t
ha t
but for the
proc
edur
al
vio
latio
n
th
e
a
genc
y
a
ction
wo
uld
have
been
d
iffer
en t.
Ctr.
f
or
L
aw
Ed
uc .
D
ep’t
of Edu
c.,
39
6 F.3
d
1152
, 1
160 D
.C.
Cir.
20
05 .
Nor
nee
d
they
es t
ab lis
h
tha
t co
rrec
ting th
e
pr
oced
ural
vio
latio
n
w
ould
ne
cess
arily alt
er
the
f
mal
effec
t
o
f the
age
ncy’
s
a
ction
on
the
50
JS
C
A
C
a
se
1
4
53
2
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t
1
53
49
07
RI
ed
:
01
/2
9/2
0
15
Pa
ge
6
4
of 7
7
p
la
int
iff
s’
in
te
re
st.
Id
Ra
th
er
i
f
th
e
pl
ai
nti
ff
s ca
n
“d
em
o
ns
tra
te
a
c
au
sa
l
re
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 65 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 65/78
la
tio
ns
hi
p
be
tw
e
en the
f
in
al
ag
en
cy
ac
tio
n a
nd
th
e
al
le
ge
d
in
ju
rie
s,
”
th
e
co
ur
t w
i
ll
“
as
su
m
e[
J th
e
c
au
sa
l r
el
ati
on
sh
ip
b
et
we
en
th
e
pr
oc
ed
ur
al
d
ef
ec
t
a
nd the
fmal
agency
action 1’
Id
E
m
ph
as
is
ad
de
d
.
T
h
e
ob
je
ct i
on
s o
n
r
ed
re
ss
ab
ili
ty
bo
ils
d
ow
n
t
o th
is:
A
n
o
rd
er
of
th
is
Co
ur
t
w
o
ul
d n
o
t
rem
e
dy t
he
ha
rm
if
A
p
pe
ll
ee
s
r
efu
se
to d
ep
or
t il l
eg
al
a
lie
ns
u
nd
e
r
ex
ist
in
g la
w
,
de
fy
in
g
a
co
ur
t o
rd
er
.
I
n f
ac
t,
if
the
C
ou
rt
gr
an
te
d A
p
pe
lla
nt
’s
M
ot
io
n fo
r
Pr
eli
m
ina
ry
In
ju
nc
ti
on
,
cu
rre
nt
la
w
w
ou
ld c
on
tin
ue
t
o
go
v
ern
.
C
u
rre
nt la
w
m
an
da
te
s t
ha
t t
he
E
xe
cu
tiv
e
B
r
an
ch
r
em
o
ve
d e
p
or t
)
1
00
o
f
all
il
le
ga
l al
ie
ns
.
Se
e
e
g
U.
S.
C.
1
22
7
,
1
22
9a
,
12
3
1.
If D
e
fe
nd
an
ts
de
po
rte
d th
e
ille
g
al a
lie
ns
t
he
y
w
o
uld
no
t b
e
in t
he
c
ou
nt
ry
t
o
ca
use
any
injury
to
Appel lan t Therefore the
Cou rt has the
power
to
r
ed
re
ss A
p
pe
lla
nt
’s
in
jur
ie
s.
If
A
p
pe
lle
es
’
am
n
es
ty
fo
r
6 m
il
lio
n
i
lle
ga
l al
ie
ns
is
ru
le
d
in
va
lid
o
n
th
e
m
er i
ts
th
e
n
Ap
pe
ll
ee
s
w
o
ul
d
re
m
ain
ob
li
ga
te
d
t
o
de
po
rt t
he
m
.
T
he
ir
a
bs
en
ce
fro
m
U
.S
. s
oi l
w
o
ul
d
eli
m
in
ate t
he
po
ss
ib
ili
ty
of
fin
an
ci
al
bu
rd
en
.
I
n th
is
, t
he
C
o
urt
m
u
st an
al
yz
e
c
ur
ren
t
la
w
,
no
t
un
su
b
sta
nt
ia
ted
s
pe
c
ula
ti
on
.
A
pp
ell
an
ts
a
re
cl
ai
m
ing
s
om
e
th
in
g
lik
e
a de
fe
ns
e
o
f
i
mp
o
ss i
bi
lit
y.
Bu
t,
at
a
m
in
im
u
m
Ap
p
ell
an
ts
w
o
uld
ne
ed
t
o
d
em
o
ns
tr
ate
th
at
the
E
x
ec
uti
ve
B
ra
nc
h’
s
bu
dg
et
re
qu
es
t
to
Co
n
gre
ss
as
ke
d fo
r
ad
di
tio
na
l
fu
nd
in
g
w
h
ic
h C
o
ng
re
ss
de
n
ied
.
51
JSc
D
C
a
se
1
4
53
25
Do
cu
m
en
t
15
3
49
07
R
Ie
d:
0
1/2
9
/20
1
5
Pa
ge
6
5
o
f
7
7
F.
T
h
e
D
is
tri
ct
Co
u
rt an
al
yz
ed
A
pp
el
lan
t’
s
s
ta
nd
in
g
a
s
be
in
g
c
au
se
d
b
y
t
hir
d
pa
rty
ac
to
rs
w
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 66 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 66/78
ho
se
ac
ts n
ot
cre
d
ite
d
to
G
o
ve
rn
m
en
t
T
he
D
is
tri
ct
C
o
urt
e
x
tensively discussed precedents
on
whether harm caused
m
or
e d
ire
ct
ly
b
y
thi
rd
p
ar
ty
a
cto
rs
ca
n be c
re
di
te
d
t
o g
ov
er
nm
e
nt
d
ef
en
da
nt
s
A
pp
ell
an
ts
h
er
e
w
it
h
r
eg
ar
d
t
o
st
an
di
ng
.
M
e
m.
O
p
at
22
2
5.
Y
e
t s
om
e
o
r
al
l
o
f
th
e
th
ird
pa
rt
y ac
to
rs
h
ere
i
lle
ga
l a
lie
ns
w
ou
ld
b
e
p
hy
si
ca
lly
re
m
ov
ed fr
om
U
.S
.
t
err
ito
ry
b
ut
f
or
De
fe
nd
an
ts
’
un
la
wf
ul
a
tte
m
pt
s
to
re
p
ea
l c
u
rre
nt
,
g
ov
er
ni
ng
la
w
.
A
p
pe
lle
es
’
pr
og
ra
ms
se
t as
id
e
c
urr
en
t
law
.
T
hu
s,
D
efe
n
da
nts
’
“d
efe
rr
ed
ac
tio
n
”
p
ro
gr
am
s
are
th
e
di
re
ct
an
d
p
ro
xi
m
at
e
c
au
se
o
f
h
ar
m
t
o
A
pp
ell
an
t.
I
f
D
ef
en
da
n
ts
en
fo
rc
ed
th
e
la
w
C
o
ng
re
ss
en
ac
ted
,
t
he
thi
rd
pa
rt
y
ac
to
rs
w
ou
ld
b
e
i
nc
ap
ab
le
of
c
au
si
ng
f
in
an
ci
al
h
ar
m
or
b
u
rd
en
s t
o
S
h
er
iffA
rp
aio
‘s
o
ffi
ce
as
a re
su
lt
o
f
th
eir
to
ta
l
absence
from
U.S. soil.
any significant
sli ce
of
the
estimated 6
m
il
lio
n i
lle
ga
l a
lie
ns
in
q
ue
sti
on
w
ere
de
po
rt
ed
ins
te
ad
of
b
ein
g
g
ra
nt
ed
a
mn
es
ty
u
nd
er A
p
pe
ll
ee
s’
p
ro
gr
am
s
h
un
d
red
s
o
f
th
ou
sa
nd
s
if
no
t
m
ill
ion
s
of
ill
eg
al
a
li
en
s
w
o
uld
n
ot b
e
o
n
U
.S
. so
il
to
b
e
a
bl
e t
o
c
au
se
a
ny
i
mp
a
ct
to
Sh
er
if
f
A
r
pa
io
’s of
fi
ce
.
L
u]
an
D
e
fe
nd
er
s
o
W
ild
lif
e
50
4
U
.
S.
55
5,
5
62
,
1
12
S.C
t
.
2
13
0
1
99
2
e
xp
la
ins
th
at
wh
e
re
a
pla
in
ti
ffs
a
ss
er
te
d
i
nju
ry
ar
is
es
fr
om
th
e
go
ve
rn
m
en
t’s
a
lle
ge
dl
y
u
nl
aw
fu
l
re
gu
la
tio
n
[of
a th
ird
pa
rt
yj”
th
e
cr
iti
ca
l
q
ue
st
ion
is
h
ow
th
e
th
ird
pa
rty
w
ou
ld
re
sp
on
d
t
o a
n
ord
e
r d
ec
la
rin
g
th
e
go
ve
rn
m
en
t’s
ac
tio
n ill
eg
al.
5
2
U
S
C
A
Ca
se
1
4
5 3
2
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t
15
34
90
7
F
ile
d
: 01
/2
9/
20
15
Pa
ge
6
6 of 7
7
G
S
ta
nd
in
g
an
al
ys
is is
no
t
as
ho
st
ile
a
s
th
e
D
is
tri
ct
Co
ur
t’
s
a
na
ly
si
s
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 67 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 67/78
T
h
e
e
n
tir
e
ap
pr
oa
ch
of
th
e
D
is
tri
ct
Co
ur
t as
su
m
ed
a
n i
na
pp
ro
p
ria
te
ho
st
ilit
y
in th
e
law
to
a
vo
id f
m
din
g
st
an
di
ng
.
B
ut s
uc
h
a
se
ar
ch
in
g
ho
st
ili
ty
is
n
ot
th
e
la
w
:
“A
s s
tat
ed
in
F
la
st
C
o
he
n
39
2
U
.S
. 8
3 10
1
88
S
.C
t.
19
4
2
1
95
3
20
L
.E
d.
2d
94
7
‘in
t
erm
s
o
f
A
r
tic
le
III
l
im
ita
ti
on
s
on
fe
de
ra
l
co
ur
t
j
uri
sd
ic
tio
n, t
he
q
ue
st
ion
s
ta
nd
in
g
i
s
re
la
te
d
on
ly
to
w
he
th
er
th
e
d
is
pu
te
s
ou
g
ht
t
o b
e
ad
ju
di
ca
ted
wi
ll
be p
res
en
te
d
in
a
n
a
dv
e
rsa
ry
c
on
te
xt
an
d
i
n
a f
orm
hi
sto
ri
ca
lly
vi
ew
ed
as ca
pa
bl
e
o
f
j
ud
ic
ia
l
re
so
lu t
io
n.’
O
r
a
s w
e
pu
t i
t
in
B
a
ke
r
C
arr
,
369 U.S.
18
6
2
04
8
2
S.
Ct
.
6
91
70
3
7 L.
Ed
.2
d
66
3 the
gi
st o
f
t
he
st
an
di
ng
i
ss
ue
is
w
h
eth
er
the
pa
rt
y
se
ek
in
g
re
lie
f
h
as ‘
all
eg
ed
su
ch
a
p
er
so
na
l
s
tak
e
in
th
e
o
utc
o
me
o
f
t
he
c
on
tr
ov
er
sy
a
s
to
as
su
re
t
ha
t
c
o
nc
ret
e
a
dv
e
rse
ne
ss
w
h
ich
sh
a
rp
en
s
th
e
pr
es
en
ta
tio
n
o
f is
su
es up
on
wh
ic
h
th
e
co
ur
t
so la
rg
el
y
de
pe
nd
s f
or ill
um
in
a
tio
n
o
f d
iff
ic
ult
c
on
sti
tu
tio
na
l
q
ue
st
io
ns
.”
L
a
/rd
Ta
tu
m
4
0
8
U
.S.
1
26
9
2
S
.C
t. 23
1
8,
3
3 L.
Ed
.2
d
1
54
19
7
2
Em
p
ha
se
s
ad
de
d.
T
hu
s,
th
e
g
ra
v
am
en
of
sta
nd
in
g a
na
ly
sis
is
to
e
ns
ur
e
a ge
nu
in
e
di
sp
ut
e,
no
t
to
du
ck
ch
al
len
g
es
t
o go
ve
rn
m
en
t
o
ve
r-r
ea
ch
.
Th
e D
ist
ric
t
C
ou
rt
b
y t
he
Ho
n
or
ab
le
E
lle
n
Hu
v
ell
e
rec
en
tl
y
u
ph
eld
st
an
di
ng
i
n a
ch
al
len
g
e
to
a
d
iff
er
en
t
co
m
po
n
en
t
o
f
th
e A
pp
el
lan
ts
’
ex
ec
ut
iv
e
ac
tio
n
immigration progr
am
s
in W
as
hin
g
ton
A
lli
an
ce
o
f
T
ec
hn
ol
og
y
W
or
ke
rs
U
S.
D
e
pa
rtm
e
nt
o
f
H
om
e
la
nd Se
cu
ri
ty
Ci
vi
l
A
ct
io
n
N
o
. 1
4
5
29
M
e
m
ora
n
du
m
O
rd
er
,
N
o
ve
m
be
r 2
1
2
0
14
.
A
s h
er
e,
D
H
S
i
n
W
AT
W
as
se
rt
ed
th
e
s
am
e v
er
y
hi
gh
sta
nd
a
rd
o
f
pr
ec
isi
on
a
nd
ce
rta
in
ty
fo
r st
an
di
ng
as
i
n
th
is
c
ase
:
53
J
Si
C
as
e 1
4
53
2
5
D
o
cu
m
en
t
1
53
49
07
i
led
0
1/2
9
/20
1
5
P
ag
e 6
7 o
f 77
“D
H
ar
gu
es
t
ha
t pl
ain
ti
ff
h
as
f
ai
led
to
pr
ov
id
e
s
uff
ic
ien
t
d
et
ail
of
t
he
th
re
e n
am
e
d
me
m
be
rs
’
t
rai
ni
ng
an
d
e
m
pl
oy
m
en
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 68 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 68/78
irc
um
s
ta
nc
es
to
es
ta
bl
ish
a
n in
ju
ry-
in
-fa
c
t ar
isi
ng
fr
om c
om
p
et
iti
on
.
M
ot
. a
t
13
.
In
p
ar
ticular ,
plaintiff
did
not
enumerate
the
specific
positions
to
w
hi
ch
it
s na
m
ed m
e
m
be
rs
a
pp
li
ed
o
r
pl
an
ne
d t
o
ap
pl
y in
th
e
fu
tu
re,
th
e
ir
q
ua
li
fic
at
ion
s f
or
th
e
jo
b,
o
r w
h
et
he
r th
e
p
os
it
ion
ap
pl
ie
d
f
or
w
as
fil
led
by
an
O
PT
st
ud
en
t
o
n
a s
ev
en
te
en
-m
o
nt
h ST
E
M
e
xt
en
sio
n
.
Id
. H
o
w
ev
er
,
s
uc
h
a
r
ig
id sh
o
wi
ng
is
sim
p
ly
n
o
t req
u
ire
d
f
or
s
tan
d
ing
. A
s
J
ud
ge
H
uv
el
le
re
pl
ied
:
“T
h
es
e
o
m
iss
io
ns
ar
e
no
t, h
ow
e
ve
r, fa
ta
l t
o pl
ai
nti
ff
s
s
tan
d
ing
,
fo
r
s
uc
h
a cl
os
e
ne
xu
s is
n
ot
r
eq
ui
red
. Se
e
H
o
ne
yw
e
ll
In
ter
n
Inc
.
v
E
P
A,
3
7
4 F
.3
d
1
36
3, 1
36
8
D.
C. C
i
r.
2
0
04
)
c
he
m
ic
al
m
a
nu
fa
ct
ur
er
ha
d
s
tan
d
ing
be
ca
us
e
th
e
ch
al
len
g
ed reg
u
lat
io
n
co
uld
le
ad cu
st
om
e
rs
to
s
ee
k
o
ut
th
e
m
an
uf
ac
tu
rer
’s
c
o
mp
e
tito
rs
i
n
t
he
fu
tu
re
);
U
n
io
n
ofBr
ic
kla
y
ers a
nd A
l
lie
d C
ra
ft
sm
en
,
7
61
f
.2
d
at
02
D.
C.
C
ir
. 19
85
)
s
ta
nd
in
g
f
ou
nd
de
sp
it
e la
ck
d
et
ai
ls
re
ga
rd
in
g
sp
e
cif
ic
f
ut
ure
jo
bs
as to
which
U.S.
bricklayers would
com pete with foreign
laborers);
L
on
gs
ho
re
m
en ‘ a
nd
W
ar
eh
ou
se
m
en
‘
U
nio
n v
M
ee
se
,
91
f
.2
d
1
37
4,
1
37
9
9
th
C
ir.
19
89
)
un
io
n
h
ad
s
tan
d
ing
to
ch
al
le
ng
e
I
mm
i
gr
ati
on
an
d
N
at
ur
ali
za
tio
n S
er
vi
ce re
gu
la
tio
n
wi
th
ou
t p
le
ad
ing
sp
ec
if
ic jo
b
o
pp
o
rtu
ni
tie
s lo
st to
C
a
na
dia
n lo
ng
sh
or
em
e
n
.
C
f Si
er
ra
C
lu
b
v J
ew
el
l,
7
64
F
.3
d
at
*
6
D
.C
.
C
ir
.
2
01
4
)
Q1
ai
nt
iff
s m
e
mb
e
rs
n
e
ed
no
t se
t
fo
ot
on
di
sp
ute
d
p
ro
pe
rt
y
to
ha
ve
in
te
re
st
in
en
jo
yin
g
it
fo
r
t
he
pu
rp
o
se o
f
e
st
ab
lis
hi
ng
i
nj
ury
.
”
“
In
M
en
do
za
,
f
or
ex
am
p
le
,
t
he
C
ou
rt
h
el
d
t
ha
t
pl
ain
ti
ffs
ha
d
s
tan
d
ing
, b
u
t w
e
re n
ot
r
eq
uir
ed t
o sh
ow
t
ha
t
t
he
y a
pp
lie
d
f
or
an
d w
er
e
de
ni
ed
a
s
pe
cif
ic
p
o
sit
ion
t
ha
t
w
a
s
fi
lle
d
b
y
a co
m
pe
tit
or
. 7
54
f
.3d
1
0
02
Em
p
ha
se
s
a
dd
e
d.
S
ta
nd
in
g s
im
p
ly
do
e
s
n
ot
r
eq
ui
re th
e v
e
ry
hig
h
b
ur
de
n o
f
US
CA C
ase
14 5
325
Doc
ume
nt
15
349
07
Fi
led:
01/2
9/20
15
Pag
e
68 o
f 7
7
prec
ision
a
nd
cert
ainty wh
ich
t
he
Di
stric
t
Cou
rt app
lied
in
this
ca s
e
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 69 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 69/78
H
Th
e Dis
trict
C
ourt
ign
ored
the
“p
roce
dura
l
inj
ury”
and
i
nfrin
gem
ent
of
the
ope
ratio
ns
o
f Sh
eriff
Arpaio’s office, similar to Arizona
United
St
ates
o
fAm
eric
a,
132
S
Ct
2
492
20
12 .
One
ma
y
we
ll
ask:
H
ow
di
d the
U S
gov
ernm
ent
hav
e
stan
ding
to
con
test
Ar
izona
’s
SB1
O7O
l
aw
in
Ariz
ona
Un
ited
St
ates,
132
S
C
t
249
2
2
012
)?
Stan
ding
wa
s
addr
esse
d
i
n t
he Co
urt
of
App
eals
at 64
1 F
3d 33 9
9t
h
C
ir
2
011)
.
SB 10
70
did
not prohibit the U.S. Government from taking any action
nor
req
uire
it to
d
o a
nyth
ing.
S
B
1
070
m
ere
ly
iden
tifie
d
illeg
al
alien
s
an
d
h
ande
d
them
ov
er
to the
U S
Gov
ernm
ent
fo
r
w
hate
ver
actio
n i
t
migh
t d
ecid
e t
o ta
ke,
incl
udin
g
no
ne. Wh
ile
Sta
te
of
ficia
ls
wer
e re
quir
ed
to
i
nqui
re
abou
t i
mmi
grati
on
stat
us,
a
state
’s
law cou
ld
not oblig
ate
the U
S G
ove
rnm
ent
to
re
spon
d.
He
re, a
s
a
llege
d
i
n th
e C
omp
lain
t
a
nd sw
orn
to i
n d
eclar
atio
ns,
Sh
eriff
Ar
paio
resp
onsi
ble
for
6
0
o
f
A
rizo
na’s
p
opu
latio
n
mu
st d
eplo
y
add
itio
nal
reso
urce
s
and r
isk
his
dep
uties
an
swe
ring
incr
ease
d c
alls
from
aff
ecte
d
ci
tizen
s.
T
he
n
umb
er
of
rep
eat
of
fend
ers
he mu
st
t
rans
port
and
hou
se
in
his j
ails
is
a
ffec
ted.
Those allegations and uncontraverted evidence must be taken
as
true.
In Ar
izon
a, P
resi
dent
O
bam
a
A
ppell
ee h
ere)
f
eare
d t
hat A
rizo
na’s
s
tate l
aw
B1
7 mi
ght
po
tenti
ally
r
estra
in
th
e U
.S. g
ove
rnme
nt’s
free r
ange
of o
ption
s,
d
ecis
ions
,
an
d
ope
ratio
ns. H
ere,
i
n
prec
isely
the
sam
e
way
, A
ppel
lees’
201
2 a
nd
55
J
SCA
C
a
se
1
4
53
2
5 D
o
cu
m
en
t
1
53
49
0
7
Fi
led:
01
/2
9/
20
15 Pa
g
e
9 of
20
14
de
fe
rre
d ac
ti
on
p
ro
gra
m
s
in f
ri
ng
e
up
on
th
e
op
er
at
io
ns of
Sh
er
iff A
rp
ai
o’
s
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 70 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 70/78
of
fic
e
a
nd
cr
ea
te an
ob
sta
cl
e
to
th
e c
on
du
ct
of
hi
s d
uti
es a
n
d
o
b
lig
at
ion
s.
Th
e
D
is
tri
ct C
o
ur
t ac
kn
ow
le
d
ge
d
at M
em
.
O
p. at 19
th
at
:
T
he
pl
ai
nti
ff is c
o
rre
ct
t
ha
t th
e
r
eg
ul
at
ion a
nd
im
p
ai
rm
en
t
of
a sta
te
o
ff
ic
er
’s o
ff
ic
ial
f
un
ct
ion
s
m
ay
b
e su
ff
ici
en
t
to
c
on
fe
r
sta
n
din
g
,
b
ut
o
n
ly
in
ce
rta
in
l
im
ite
d
ci
rcu
m
st
an
ce
s.
S
e
e
e
.g
.,
L
o
m
on
t
‘N
eil
2
85
F
3
d
9
1
3—
14
D
.C
. C
fr
.
2
00
2
h
ol
din
g th
a
t
a
st
ate S
h
eri
ff
an
d
P
o
lic
e C
h
iefh
ad s
ta
nd
in
g
to ch
a
lle
ng
e
f
ed
er
al
law p
erm
i
tti
ng
st
at
e
p
o
lic
e o
ff
ici
al
s
to
p
ro
vid
e c
er
tif
ic
at
ion
s
r
el
ati
ng
to th
e
tr
an
sf
er
of
certain
firearms);
Fraternal
Order
of
the
Police
United
States,
5
2
F
.3d
9
9
8,
1
1—
2
D
.C
.
C
ir.
19
9
).
H
o
we
ve
r,
th
e
D
i
str
ict
Co
u
rt m
is
rea
d
th
os
e p
rec
ed
en
ts
c
la
im
in
g:
Ye
t, n
ei
the
r L
o
mo
n
t
no
r F
ra
ter
na
l
Or
de
r of th
e
Po
lic
e
s
up
po
rt
t
he
p
la
int
iff
’s
ar
gu
m
en
t
h
er
e,
a
s bo
th
c
ase
s
c
on
ce
rn
ed th
e
d
ire
ct r
eg
ul
at
ion o
f
a s
ta
te of
fi
ce
r’s of
fic
ia
l du
tie
s.
Mem.
Op. at 19-20. In fact,
how ever,
those precedents
did not
involve
“direct
r
eg
ul
ati
on
”
of
la
w en
fo
rc
em
en
t.
Th
e Lo
m
on
t c
o
urt e
xp
la
in
ed
, a
t
2
85 f 3
d a
t
14:
“U
n
lik
e
t
he
B
ra
dy A
ct
,
t
he
c
er
tif
ic
ati
on
re
gu
la
tio
ns d
o
n
ot
‘
co
m
m
an
d the
St
at
es
’
of
fic
er
s,
o
r th
os
e o
f t
he
ir
po
li
tic
al
su
bd
iv
isi
on
s, to
ad
m
in
ist
er o
r e
nf
or
ce a fe
de
ra
l
r
eg
ul
ato
ry
p
ro
gr
am
.
’ Pr
in
tz
Un
it
ed St
at
es
, 5
21
U
.S
. at 9
35
,
11
7 S
.C
t.
a
t 23
84
.
L
oc
al an
d st
at
e o
ff
ic
ia l
s h
av
e
th
e
o
pt
io
n o
f
participating
or not. See
53
Fed .Reg .
10,480, 10,488 M ar. 31,
1
98
8
). T
he
re i
s no
fed
er
al c
ar
ro
t to e
nc
ou
ra
ge
pa
rt
ici
pa
tio
n
an
d n
o
fe
de
ra
l
s
ti
ck
to
d
isc
o
ura
g
e
n
o
np
ar
tic
ip
ati
on
”
In
fr
at
er
na
l O
rd
er o
f
Po
li
ce
5
2 F
3d a
t
1
00
1, m
o
d
ifi
ed o
n
ot
he
r
gr
ou
nd
s
b
y
7
3 F
3d
8
98
D
.C
. C
ir
., 1
99
9
),
the
in
ter
fe
re
nc
e of
th
e fed
e
ral
reg
u
lat
io
ns w
ith
6
S
L A a
se
14 5
325
D
ocum
ent
1
534
907
Filed
:
01
/29/
2015
a
ge 70
of 7
7
S
ta
te
la
w
en
fo
rc
em
en
t
w
as
s
lig
h
tly
m
o
re s
ig
ni f
ic
an
t b
u
t
sti
ll
l
itt
le d
iff
ere
n
t
fro
m
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 71 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 71/78
t
he
in
te
rfe
re
nc
e
w
it
h S
h
eri
ff
A
rp
ai
o’
s
o
ff
ic
e
he
re
:
“S
ev
e
ral C
L
EO
s
a
lle
ge th
at
en
fo
rc
em
e
nt
o
f th
e
9
96
am
en
d
me
n
ts co
nf
lic
ts
w
ith th
e
ir ob
lig
at
io
ns
un
de
r
s
ta
te
law
Al
th
ou
gh
th
ere is
n
o
in
di
ca
tio
n
th
at th
is
is
tru
e in
th
e h
ar
d
co
re
se
ns
e
of fe
de
ra
l
l
aw
r
eq
u
iri
ng
a
ny
C
L
EO
to
do s
om
e
th
in
g st
at
e
la
w
fo
rb
id
s o
r v
ic
e v
er
sa
, it
se
em
s tr
ue
in th
e
b
ro
ad
er
p
ra
ct
ic
al
s
en
se th
a
t if
a
C
L
E
O
c
om
p
lie
s w
it
h th
e d
om
e
sti
c
v
io
le
nc
e
m
i
sd
em
e
an
or pr
ov
is
ion
s, h
e
wi
ll fm
d h
im
se
lf
,
in
an
y
e
nfo
rc
em
e
nt
ac
tiv
it
y r
eq
ui
rin
g fir
ea
rm
s, u
na
b
le to
u
se
of
fic
er
s
w
h
o
f
al
l
under
the federal ban, even where
in
his
judgment
it
is
hi
gh
ly
d
esi
ra
bl
e or
ev
en c
rit
ica
l
to us
e
su
ch o
ff
ice
rs
.”
A
c
co
rd
in
gl
y,
if
Sh
er
iff A
rp
ai
o do
es
no
t h
av
e st
an
din
g
,
t
he
n
ne
ith
e
r
d
id
th
e
U
.S
. G
ov
er
nm
e
nt
ha
ve s
ta
nd
in
g t
o br
ing
Ar
iz
on
a v
U
nit
ed S
tat
es
H
e
re
,
Sh
er
iff
A
rp
aio h
as t
he
sa
m
e
s
ta
nd
in
g,
at l
ea
st,
as
th
e Pl
ai
nti
ff
in
A
ri
zo
na
v
Un
it
ed St
ate
s
13
2
S.
Ct
2492 2012 .
I
.
T
he
D
is
tri
ct
C
ou
rt
c
on
str
ue
d A
pp
el
la
nt’
s
ca
se a
n
d a
na
ly
ze
d sta
nd
in
g
on
ly in
r
ela
ti
on
t
o
“
po
li
cy
m
ak
in
g
be
tt
er
le
ft
to
th
e p
o
liti
ca
l b
ra
nc
h
es
”
an
d “g
en
e
ral
iz
ed
g
ri
ev
an
ce
s w
hi
ch a
re
n
ot pr
op
er f
or
th
e J
ud
ic
ia
ry
to
ad
d
res
s
”
Th
e
D
is
tr
ict
C
ou
rt
f
ai l
ed
to an
a
lyz
e
o
r ru
le
u
p
on th
e
A
pp
e
lla
nt
’s
st
an
di
ng
to
bring
the ac tual case
and
controversy that
the
Appellant
in
fact
filed . The
District
C
ou
rt an
al
yz
ed
an
d
ru
le
d
u
p
on sta
n
din
g o
nly
w
i
th r
eg
ar
d
to
cl
ai
ms
th
at
th
e
A
pp
el
lan
t
d
id
n
ot
b
rin
g
.
A
s a
res
ul
t, r
ath
er
th
an v
ie
w
ing
th
es
e
e
ve
nt
s
as
a c
ho
ic
e
b
et
we
en
fo
ll
ow
in
g
C
on
gr
es
s’ c
on
im
an
d
s o
n im
m
ig
ra
tio
n e
nf
or
ce
me
n
t S ee
e.g
.
J
SDA
as
e
14-
5325
Doc
ume
nt
1534
907
Fil
ed:
01/2
9/20
15
ag
e
71
of
7
7
U
.S
.C
.
12
27
122
9a, 1
231
or
de
fy
ing
C
on
gr
es
s,
th
e
Di
st
ric
t
C
ou
rt vi
ew
ed
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 72 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 72/78
ev
er
y
a
sp
ec
t
o
f
th
e ca
se
as
a
ch
o
ice b
e
tw
ee
n Sh
er
iff
A
rp
ai
o’
s
ow
n
ind
e
pe
nd
en
t
pr
ef
err
ed p
ol
icy
on
i
m
m
igr
at
io
n
en
fo
rc
em
e
nt
v
e
rsu
s
Pr
es
id
en
t O
b
am
a
’s pr
ef
er
red
i
m
m
igr
at
io
n
e
nf
or
ce
me
n
t
po
lic
ie
s.
T
he
D
is
tr
ict
C
o
ur
t ex
pl
ai
ne
d its
d
ism
i
ssa
l
in
p
a
rt, as
:
“T
h
e
p
la
in
tif
fs i
na
bi
lit
y
t
o e
n
for
ce f
ed
er
al
i
m
mi
gr
ati
on la
w is
in
te
gr
all
y
r
el
ate
d to th
e
ce
nt
ra
l q
ue
st
ion in
t
hi
s case
:
W
he
th
er
the
plaintiff
has standing
to
demand changes
to
the
“broad
d
is
cr
eti
on
”
gr
an
te
d
ftd
er
al o
ff
ic
ial
s re
ga
rd
in
g
re
m
ov
al
D
e
sp
ite the
co
ns
eq
ue
n
ce
s
o
f
un
la
wf
ul
i
mm
i
gr
ati
on in
M
a
nc
op
a
C
o
un
ty
, th
e
pl
ain
ti
ff
c
an
n
ot
m
e
et
t
he
re
q
uir
em
e
nt
s
fo
r st
an
di
ng to
b
rin
g
t
his
su
it.
”
M
e
m
. p
a
t
5
e
m
ph
as
is ad
de
d
. T
hu
s
th
e C
ou
rt
v
ie
w
ed
th
e ca
se
as
S
h
er
iff
A
r
pa
io
’s a
tte
m
pt “
to
d
e
ma
nd c
ha
ng
es
” p
re
fe
rre
d
b
y
A
rp
a
io.
B
u
t qu
ite
o
bv
io
us
ly
th
e
Ap
p
ell
an
t’s
C
o
m
pla
in
t d
em
a
nd
s th
at g
o
ve
rn
in
g law
be o
be
ye
d:
se
e als
o
P
l.’
s
Su
pp
De
cl
. ¶
3
“B
y thi
s l
aw
su
it
,
I
am
se
ek
in
g to
ha
ve t
he
Pr
es
id
en
t
a
n
d
oth
e
r
D
ef
en
da
n
ts
ob
ey
th
e U.
S.
C
o
ns
tit
ut
ion a
nd
t
he
im
m
ig
ra
tio
n
law
s
M
em
. O
p at
2
1
Si
mi
la
rly
,
th
e Di
st
ric
t C
ou
rt i
nd
ic
ate
d
a
wa
re
ne
ss th
at
en
fo
rci
ng
existing,
governing
law
is
the
central
point
in
dispute,
while
stating:
“I
nd
ee
d
,
it
is
n
ot a
p
pa
ren
t
ex
ac
tly
wh
a
t
c
og
n
iza
bl
e int
er
es
t an
d
in
ju
ry
th
e p
la
int
iff c
an
ass
er
t si
nc
e,
as t
he
p
la
in
tif
fs
C
o
m
pla
in
t
re
co
g
ni
ze
s th
e pl
ain
ti
ff
h
as no
le
ga
l au
th
or
ity to
en
fo
rc
e th
e
i
m
mi
gr
at
ion law
s
o
f
t
he
U
n
ite
d Stat
es
S
ee
C
om
p
l.
at
9 ”
M
e
m
.
Op
a
t2
O.
5
S
C
ase
14
5325
Do
cum
ent
1534
907
iled
01
/29/
2015
P
age
72
of 77
So
the
Di
stric
t Cou
rt
an
alyz
ed
the
c
omp
laint for
st
andin
g
p
urpo
ses
pu
rely as
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 73 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 73/78
Sh
eriff Ar
palo see
king
to
im
pose
his o
wn i
deas
a
bou
t
imm
igra
tion on
the U.S.
G
ove
rnm
ent.
The
Di
stric
t
C
our
t
fu
rther
e
labo
rated
:
“T
he
ro
le of th
e J
udic
iary is to res
olve
cas
es and con
trov
ersie
s
pro
perl
y
brou
ght
by
pa
rties wi
th a
conc
rete and pa
rticu
lariz
ed
in
jury—
not
to en
gage i
n
p
olicy
mak
ing
bett
er
l
eft to the
poli
tical
b
ranc
hes. Th
e
plain
tiffs cas
e r
aise
s
im p
or ta
nt
q
ues
tions re
gard
ing
t
he
imp
act
of
il
lega
l
i
mm
igrat
ion on
thi
s
Nati
on, but t
he que
stion
s am
ount
to
generalized
grievances
wh
ich
are
not
p
rope
rfo
r
the
Jud
icia
ry
to
ad
dres
s. Fo
r
th
e
rea
sons
e
xpla
ined in m
ore de
tail
belo
w, the p
laint
iff lac
ks
st
andi
ng to brin
g
this
c
hall
enge
to
th
e
co
nsti
tutio
nalit
y
and
l
egali
ty o
f
th
e
imm
igra
tion p
olic
ies
a
t
issu
e.”
M
em .
O
p.
at
2
3 e
mph
ases a
dded
. Th
e
c
halle
ng e the D
istric
t
C
ourt c
onsid
ered
w
as
on ly
to
“
poli
cym
aking b
etter left
to
th
e pol
itica
l
bran
che
s.
A
nd:
“Th
e key
qu es
tion
in th
is ca
se , h
owe
ver,
co
nc e
rn s
th
e ap p
rop
riate
fo
rum
fo
r whe
re
th i
s
na
tiona
l
co
nver
satio
n sh
ould
o
ccu
r. T he
d
oc tr
ine
of
s
tand
ing
in
both
its c
onst
ituti
onal
an
d
p
rude
ntia
l
form
ulat
ions
c
on ce
rns
itse
lf
with
“th
e p
rope
r—a
nd p
rope
rly li
mite
d—r
ole of
th
e
c
ou rt
s
in
a dem
ocra
tic socie
ty.” B
enn
ett Sp
ear, 52
0
U.
S.
15
4
162
199
7 q
uo ti
ng
W
art/
i S
eld in
,
4
22
U.S. 490
,498
19
75
.
Sta
ndin
g
“ens
ures t
ha t
[c
ourt
sJ
ac t
as
ju
dges
, an
d do no
t e
ngag
e in p
olicy
ma
king
p
rop
erly
l
eft
to
elec
ted r
epre
sent
ative
s.” Ho
lling
swo
rth
Perry,
133
S.
Ct.
2652 ,
2659
2013 .”
M
em
.
Op
.
at
em
ph as
is
in
o
rigi
nal . T
he Co
ur t
con
strue
d
t
he
ca
se
as
a
p
olic
y
disp
ute
with
S
heri
ff A
rpa
io
a
“nat
iona
l co
nve
rsati
on”
Co
nc e
rns o
ve r the ju
dici
al role a
re h
eigh
tene
d
wh
en
the is
sue
b
efore
t
he
cou
rt
in
vo lv
es
as he
re, e
nforc
eme
nt of the
im
mig
ratio
n
59
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 74/78
JSDA
Case
14-5325
Document 1534907
Piled:
01/29/2015
Page
74
of 77
of
amnesty and immunity
from prosecution
and
other
benefits that
do
not
comply
with the
APA or
with
the substance of the
authorizing
statutes.
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 75 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 75/78
However, because
the District Court misconstrued the case
in
question:
The plaintiff
claims that the challenged deferred action
programs,
which
provide
guidance to
Federal
law
enforcement
regarding the removal
or non-removal
of
undocumented
immigrants inhibit
his
ability
to
perform
his
official functions as
the
Sheriff
of
Maricopa County.
Mem. Op. at
19 emphasis added . And, moreover :
Finally
the
challenged deferred action programs merely
provide
guidance to immigration officials
in
the exercise of their official
duties.
This
helps to ensure
that
the exercise of
deferred action
is not
arbitrary and capricious,
as
might be the
case
if
the
executive branch offered no
guidance
to enforcement officials.
It
would make
lit tle sense for a Court to strike down as arbitrary
and capricious guidelines tha t help ensure that the Nation’s
immigration
enforcement is not arbitrary
but rather
reflective of
congressionally-directed
priorities.
Mem.
Op. at 32 emphases added .
And, similarly:
Th e
plaintiffs inability to enforce
federal immigration
law is
integrally related
to the central
question
in
this
case:
Whether
the
plaintiff has standing to demand
changes
to
the “broad
discretion”
granted
federal officials
regarding removal. Despite
the
consequences
of
unlawful immigration
in
Maricopa County,
the
plaintiff cannot meet the requirements
for
standing
to bring this
suit.
Mem. Op. at
15
emphasis
added . And:
In contrast, the
challenged deferred action
programs do not
regulate
the
official conduct
of
the plaintiff
but
merely regulate
61
U
SCA
C
ase
14
532
5 D
ocu
men
t
15
349
07 e
d
0
1/29
/201
5
Pa
ge 7
5 o
f 77
the
cond
uct of
fede
ral imm
igra
tion
of
fic ia
ls
in
th
e ex
erci
se
of
the
ir
offic
ial
duti
es.
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 76 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 76/78
Me
m.
p
a
t
20 em
pha
sis
ad
ded
.
B
ut Ap
pella
nt
is
not
see
king
to i
mpo
se
c
hang
es b
ut
to ma
inta
in
cu
rrent law
with
out
int
erfer
ence
.
C
ONC
LU
SIO
N
Fo
r
th
e fo
rego
ing
rea
sons
the d
ecisi
on
of
the Di
stric
t
Co
urt
shou
ld
re
spec
tfully
be
reve
rsed
and
re
mand
ed
w
ith
instr
uctio
ns
t
o ent
er
a
pr
elim
inar
y
i
njun
ction
to pr
even
t
th
e on g
oin
g
ha
rm
to
S
herif
f Ar
pa io
’
s offi
ce
Or
al
argu
men
t is
res
peci
fully r
equ
ested
.
Dat
ed: Janu
ary
2
9 2
015
R
espe
ctfu
lly
S
ubm
itted
Is
La
rry
Klav
man
L
arry K
lay
man
Es
q.
D.C
.
B
ar
N
o. 334
581
F
reed
om
W
atc
h I
nc .
202
0
Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia
Av
e. N
W
Suit
e
345
W
ash
ingto
n
DC
200
06
Te
l:
310
5
95 -0
80 0
Em
ai l:
le1
day
man
gma
il.co
m
6
4*
SCA Case
1
4 53
25 D
ocu
men
t
1
534
907 F
iled:
01/2
9/20
15 Page 7
6 o
f
C
ERT
IFIC
AT
E
OF CO
MP
LIAN
CE
T
his bri
ef com
plie
s
w
ith
th
e
typ
e-vo
lum
e
lim
itat
ion
of F
ed R.
App
. P.
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 77 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 77/78
32 a 7 B because this
brief
contains
13 968
words, excluding the parts
of
the
bri
ef
e
xem
pted b
y F
ed R
. Ap
p.
P.
3
2 a
7 B
ii
i
a
nd
Circ
uit
Ru
le 32 .
Th
is brie
f
co
mpl
ies with
the ty
pefa
ce req
uire
men
ts of F
ed R.
App
. P.
32
a 5
and
the
typ
e
s
tyle req
uire
men
ts of
F
ed R.
A
pp . P. 3
2 a
6
beca
use this
brief
has bee
n pr
epar
ed
in
a pr
opor
tiona
lly-
spac
ed
t
ypef
ace us
ing M
icros
oft Wo
rd
2007
in 1
4-po
int
T
ime
s New Ro
man
fo
nt
Resp
ectf
ully
s
ubm
itted
,
Is Larr
y
K
lavm
an
Larr
y } la
yma
n, Esq
D.C
.
B
ar
N
o. 334
581
Free
dom
Wat
ch,
In
c
202
0
Pe
nnsy
lvan
ia A
ve N
W,
Su
ite
34
5
Was
hing
ton,
D
C
2
0006
Te
l: 31
0
5
95-
0800
Email:
leldaymangmail.
corn
63
L
JSC
A
C
ase
14 5
325
Doc
ume
nt
15
3490
7 File
d:
01
/29/
2015
Pa
ge
7
7 of
7
7
CE
RTI
FICA
TE OF
SE
RV
ICE
I
H
ERE
BY C
ER
TIFY
that
on th
is
th
d
ay
o
f
Janu
ary, 201
5,
a
tru
e
a
nd
USCA Case #14-5327 Document #1536137 Filed: 02/04/2015 Page 78 of 78
8/9/2019 USCA-DCC 14-5327 Motion for Judicial Notice of USCA-DCC 14-5325 as Related Case Arpaio v Obama Appellant Brief and Appendix I II
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/usca-dcc-14-5327-motion-for-judicial-notice-of-usca-dcc-14-5325-as-related 78/78
cor
rect
cop
y
of
the foreg
oing
Bri
efw
as s
ubmitted electronically
to
the
U.S.
Circuit
C
our
t for
th
e Dis
trict
of
C
olum
bia C
ircui
t
and se
rved
via
CM
/EC
F
upon the
fol
lowi
ng:
A
DAM
D.
K
IR
CHN
ER
Tr
ial
At
torne
y
C
ivil Div
isio
n, fede
ral Pr
ogra
ms B
ranc
h
U
.S .
Depa
rtm
ent
o
f
J
ustic
e
P
.O . B
ox
83
Was
hing
ton,
D.C
. 20
044
T
el.:
202
) 353
-926
5
fa
x: 2
02) 61
6-84
70
Adam
.
K
irsc
hner
usdo
j
.g
ov
A
ttorn
ey f
or
Def
enda
nts
Resp
ectf
ully Su
bmi
tted
Is
Lar
ry
Klay
man
Lar
ry Kla
yma
n, E
sq .
D.C
. Bar
No.
3
345
81
f
reed
om
Wa
tch,
Inc.
2
020
Pen
nsyl
vani
a Av
e. N
W, Su it
e 3
45
Wa
shin
gton
, DC
2
0006
Tel:
31
0
59
5-08
00
Em a
il:
leklaymangrnai1.
com
64