usc ga april 16

7/31/2019 USC GA April 16

1/18

Minutes of Meeting

Prepared by Alexandra Santos

Title: USC General Assembly

Venue: Yakal lobby

Date: April 16, 2012

Start: 7:15pm End: 12:15am

Attendance

Roll call As of 7:20

Chairperson Heart Dino

Vice-Chairperson Alex Castro

Councilors

Lucho Ayala absent

Pat Bringas

Clement Carlos (late)

Aryanna Canacan (late)

Jio GuiangReg Punzalan

Revee Rapallo

Alex Santos

Sol Vicencio

College Representatives

Erika Erro AIT Rep late

Peter Paredes Arki Rep absentEds Gabral Cal Rep

Jonas Cruz CBA Rep

Carla Gonzales CHE Rep late

Joeric Crescini CSSP Rep


2/18

Marky Tagala CSWCD Rep

Miko Gloria Econ Rep

Rage GonzalesEngg Rep late (absent)

Ayka Go FA Rep

Tina Reyes Law Rep

Pats Poblador Music Rep

Nikole Alicer NCPAG Rep

Roscelle Cruz SLIS Rep

Late:

Maan Espinosa (7:30)

Mijo Solis (7:40)

Jules Giang (7:45)

Gayle greyCHK Rep (9:15)

Absent:

Chris OmegaEduc Rep (Japan) late

Jap PalinoEngg Rep (Baguio)

Sarah TorresCMC Rep

Ren Bondad CS Rep absent

Stephen VillejoStat Rep (Leyte)

1. intro of yakal house council present2. Miko g: order food

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3. UP Alyansa proposal to be present in the GA USC watchmay post live feeds.a. Ipapasa ko ung letter aroundb. We should not censor any form of media

4. Tulong iskoa. Buong UP diliman, college repscommitment of Local councilhave

balikbayan box in there offices.

b. April 20list of councils (last day of confirmationand submission of logos)c. Pub mat: cmcsc


3/18

i. Designlogo ng usc, Toble (green and maroon)ii. Lc should submit the council logo

d. Questionsi. Jonas: kasama ba din ung paghanap ng volunteers? Yes

ii. Heart: By may: craw head shall be the one to decide opsiii. Alex C: local councils should have a database of volunteersiv. Heart: craw head: create a core committee for this as in disasterv. Peter: include cofs

vi. Rage: paano ung univ wide orgs?vii. Heart: basta bahala na ang local councils to tap the orgs as well.

5. UP manila harrassment case statementa. Heart: Aryanna will draft the official statement

i. Summary of the incident in manila and Mindanao1. Heart: Connect to cswcd para maconnect to UPD situation2. Aryanna:

a. Manila: sinundan sa bahayb. Cswcd: field workmistaken id

3. Marky: Pnoy: energy talk in Mindanao (present ang UPleaders), may nasuntok.

4. Alex c: calsc, cswcdsc and Law, baka gusto makisama ng USC6. Human rights violations

a. KatarunganTie up with dean Pangalangan, LSG, IHR, and other universities(i.e. Ateneo, La Salle)

b. Spearhead violations against student leadersc. Human rights education (main campaign of katarungan)d. Palparan, GMAe. Jio: tap karapatan orgsila ang may hawak ng kay Karen and Shef. Marky: pwede din nating tignan ang statements ng Karapatan that defend

Human rightsg. Tina: why not also tap other HR advocate org?h. Erika: ok lang ba ung mga proposals ipost sa mga group para alam ng lahat?

7. Sol: Officlal statement on SM baguio cutting of trees (182)a. Peter: ASC will release a statement, baka pwedeng ipagsama ang ASC and

USC?b. Heart: as USC ano ba ang gusto nating makita? Statement ng USC dapat

separate

c. Jio: general call dapatd. Heart: must recognize the greediness of SMe. Erika: maraming profit oriented companies, macocompromise ang ating

resources (corporate greed)

f. Jonas: not just profit oriented, must look at the rights na pwedengmatapakan..as well as business ethics

g. Peter: show how laws are bent


4/18

h. Alex c: focus less on environment shit but on the industrial level, DENR: canwe achieve development without cutting trees?

i. Heart: then must focus on these points: environmental right, business ethics,laws that are violated

j. Erika: hamunin ang NEDA and DENRk. Heart: personal points idaan kay sol

i. Release for both? Latest april 19(internal)? April 20 for official releaseii. Must release agad both statements kasi urgent matters

iii. Draft facts first para magayos ung official call8. Bantay Budget Network

a. Campaign for UP education budgetb. The network: for the budget of SUCs as a national campaignc. UPd: point persons revee, sol, julesd. No political party spearheaded thisWe can then tap other local councilse. May: official delibs therefore must hold campaigns sa congress and BBNf. Official color: ORANGEg. college reps tap Local Councilsh. Revee: college reps relay the message of the bantay budgeti. campaign on the start of June classes

9. Brandinga. team USC? Team tayo sa USC?b. Eds: USC groupc. Pat: wait for final brandingd. Heart: accessible, united,e. Vid concept: taking off colors to whitef. Engaging, makabayan,g. Spearhead branding: alex s, pat, sarahh. Jules: Tuloy ba ang vm? Yes but time constraintsi. Spearhead Vm: Nicole, with the help of pats, jules, Erika

10. 2 tentative provisions on the House rulesi. Heart:

1. Review:a. heading of comm. Headsb. if any member of the student council and if his or her

ofs who is involved in any form of violence must release

an official statement within 2 week,

c. must protect the right of the student body, therefore weshould know the side of the involved council member,

ii. Jules: kailangan ba ung criminal violence sanctioned ng criminal lawand sdt?

iii. Tina: yes kasi mas madaling madefineiv. Joeric: gawing within a weekv. Sol: baka mapush back lang kung tatagal ng more than a week


5/18

vi. Jules: within two weeks? Dahil sa privilege week pero ang statementpwedeng earlier

vii. Jio: principle of giving the time frame1. it just right that you release the statement coz of safeguarding

your constituentsviii. Heart: Release ng statement within one week after the incident, next

GA give privilege speech

ix. Carlos: when will you be required to give a privilege speech?x. Tina: upon suspicion, we want to shed light agad

xi. Eds: suggestion sa wording: remove ofs line.xii. Heart: either way whether or not directly involved, as a member you

can shed some light on the matter.

xiii. Eds: mas maganda na itap din ang ibang ofs na involved?xiv. Heart: clarification: naapprove na only move to changed the time

provision

xv. Erika: paano as an individual may alam ako?xvi. Heart: encompassing

xvii. Heart: we want them to be accountable, secure right and welfare ofthe students. I cant accept na wala silang alam that can be thestatement

xviii. Alexc: the orig statement: preventive suspensionremove naginginhibition then lets say affiliated ka, dapat may karapatan siya

magsalita

xix. Nicole: Who says who are the suspects?xx. Heart: Police report. And also you must release a statement based on

rumors (thats part of the investigation to also confirm theirinvolvementwhether innocent of not)

xxi. Tina: we want to give them the chance to air their point of view as apart of the involved

xxii. Marky: if thats the case, then ok lang na tanggalin?xxiii. Heart: kailangan mong tumulong sa investigationito ang alam koxxiv. Tina: if you remove the affiliation: pwedeng magopt outxxv. Eds: that also means na kukunin din natin ung sides ng iba na hindi

affiliated sa USCxxvi. Heart: responsibility to the students as USC

xxvii. Conclusion: shorten to one week: official statement, privilegespeechto be responsive

xxviii. Mijo: sino kasama sa task force?xxix. Heart: bubuo tayo.,.gagawa tayo ng task forcexxx. Tina: pag nasangkot ka or your affiliation, you must release a official

statement within a week and/or a privilege speech on the nearest GA

xxxi. Heart: tina will draftxxxii. Aryanna: must clarify the investigative body.


6/18

xxxiii. Heart: must finalize pag nagkaroon ng incident but by defaulteveryone is a part of the task force, if a person in involved must inhibit

his/herself in the fact findingxxxiv. Jules: un na ba ung house rules na iraratify natin?xxxv. Heart: Yes pero may isa paung election of committee Heads

xxxvi. Eds: ilang premise ng house rules pwede pa bang ireview?xxxvii. Heart: Pero inisaisa natin nung year plan. Plus emphasis on the

additional1. April 20: run through of all the houserules..formally approve

the house rules.

xxxviii. Tina: suggestion: read up then only bring up ung merong contentionspara hindi na mahaba

xxxix. Heart:saddened na parang walang full participationxl. Eds: naburn out na din kasi

xli. Peter: ready all the main pointsxlii. Alexc: maganda rin na we look at it as a whole not because we didnt

participate

11.April 20 1030am: oath taking at the office of the chancellora. Erika: Paano pag hindi makakapunta?b. Heart: technically hindi required meaning hindi ka tatanggalin

i. Sure na Pwede (raise of hands): heart alexc, maan, Pat, alex, tina,joeric, Carla, jules, jio, ayka, revee, lucho, peter, pats,

ii. Final sched na toc. Erika: Ok lang ba magrelease ng excuse letter for those who cant come? go!d. 1 hour. May pakain

12.Bonding with USC 1112a. april 19 dinner

13.Date of comm. Deliba. Heart

i. There must be an assessment first from the previous USCii. when we propose include tentative calendar of activities, must be sure

of your proposallubog na ang mga projects sa nangyayari sa UP, samga students

iii. consult na rin possible offices na pwede nating makatrabahoiv. one week after the giving of the assessment then submissionv. deadline of proposal: april 27

vi. must say kung magpopropose ang isang tao para hindi magkakarooonng delibs until the person is present.

vii. Hindi rin naman technically required ma magtrabaho tayo ng summerb. Eds: ung iba urgent na magtrabaho ng may 8 or even earlier, ung 4 days is

enough time.

c. Heart: Conflict dahil may mga trabaho, and graduation.


7/18

i. Kailan din kasi mag pakilala sa freshiegusto ko lang na maayos angmga proposals

d. Erika: naniniwala na malaki ang epekto ng assessmente. Jonas: we have our own insights but we must take into account their insights

as wellf. Eds: whats our assurance na makukuha na by the 19th? For flexibility, para

magawa na rin ung mga urgent projects

g. Carla: so that we will know the quality of the work, para we dont need tofuss too much

h. Alex c: bakit hindi pwedeng patagalin? Gawa na lang ng adhoc comm. Paramagawa talaga ung mga immediate projects

i. Heart: lahat ng projects will officially start 2nd week of may, kung gusto ngadhoc for freshie? Sinong maghhead? Volunteer? Ano ba ung mga immediateprojects?

14.Labor issuesa. april 20 mtg (EducDisc) re stand to be released on the april 27( join the rally

no specific one)

b. mobilize ng may 1i. (kung kelan at kung kanino sasamakanyakanyang bulto na lang)

ii. hindi required na magsamasama ang usc members.iii. Magkitakita for attendance ng may 1 then separate na

c. Marky: hinihintay kasi ng buong Pilipinas ang sasabihin ni USC chaird. Miko: buong USC namane. Erika: pwede kang magsalita based on the USC branding and label as USCf. Miko Erika; kung anong trip mo sabihin sa interviewg. Heart: kailangan pa rin sabihin ung stand ng USC, morning ang rally

i. April 30may6 committee delibs1. may 1 rally dapat hanggang 430, 5pm delibs na

h. Erika: umikot muna togetheri. Revee: may iba ibang contingents morning and afternoonj. Heart: I go for morning tayo

15.Freshie orientation programa. may 812b. Convene local councils may 3c. May 711: advanced registrationd. freshie adhoc: alex, eds, roscelle, Erika, mijo, pats, reg, Carla, ragee. gagawa ng usc videof. welcome freshie vid pag mag freshie comm

16.May 15: GSTa. Adhoc: pat bringas, aryanna, jio marky, joeric, roscelle, luchob. Kailangan ng man power

17.SCHEDULE::a. April 20 labor issue


8/18

b. april 27 release statementc. april 30may6 delibsd. may 711 adv rege. may 812 fopf. may 15 gst

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

break: 9:10pm

resume: 9:35pm

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________18.Committee delibs

a. Heart: gutso ba natin magumiikot ang comm. Delibs? Yes.i. Venue c/o Heart

ii. LCD projector c/o Miko G.iii.

April 26: deadline of proposals 912mn1. Email to heart and alex c nasa directory (pdf file)

a. Rationaleb. Vmgc. Structured. Activitiese. Calendar

iv. Heart and alex c will release by april 271. 12;15am usc group2. 10am public release

v. Hindi pa alam kung may pera from previous USCvi. Ang alam ko may utang ang UP fairb. Revee: may pera pero galing UJF

c. Eds: sa lahat na lang isend?d. Heart:

i. 30 mins for standing committeeii. 20mins ssc proposal per proponent

iii. 10 mins finalizing of questionsiv. grilling for max 1 1/2 hour per committeev. screening of publics question

vi. post the answers (online)tap tinig and kule (as official mediapartner) dahil wala pang sec and mmc

vii. Dzup? Kung kayae. Jio: name the proponent?i. Heart: dapat para alma kung kailangan imove ung delibs for a specific

committee

ii. Jio: members shall take the time to scrutinize the proposal not theproponent

iii. Motion na iname: eds second: marky


9/18

f. Tina: last year, big issue ang councilor vs college repssettle thisi. Problem last year: settle through precedence, pero dapat hindi

ii. Standing dapat talaga counciloriii. Heart: context: naraise during the comm. Delibstama ung rule pero

hindi na sunod dahil nagstart na.iv. Erika: options:v. Maan: art 9 sec 2 of USC constitution

vi. Tina: practicablefrom the word practicalvii. Jonas: last year kasi may isang councilor na walang hinead

viii. Miko: babalik tayo sa merit ang proposalix. Sol: ung pagkawaley ng proposal subjective, pwede naman niya

ipass ung plans nya to the head

x. Jonas: councilor who won should not limit himself to his proposal,may also incorporate others

xi. Heart: According to Mike Tiu, dapat hindi umabot na councilor vscollege repworking on the context na magkaiba ung role ng collegerep and councilor

xii. Miko: how will you screen na hindi mangyayari un?xiii. Erika: we should base it on proposal? Hindi ba ako biased?xiv. Heart: how do we implement?xv. Jonas: Theory of political design: redundant na maghead ang college

rep kasi mayroon siya sariling responsibility sa sarili din nya college

xvi. Sol: anong dapat gawin ng councilor? Trabaho ng councilor angmaghead ng comm. So unahin ang mga proposals ng councilors..not aquestion of capabilities

xvii. Lucho: college rep=task: liaison to the USC, kailangan then unahin angcouncilor

xviii. Aryanna: wag natin iconfine lang sa consti, kung naniniwala tayo nakung mas capable ang college rephindi naman ganun kabigat angresponsibility ng college rep pati kung alam naman nya na kaya nya

xix. Eds: consti outdated1. there are certain rules nakailangang iamend2. sa usc lahat tayo pantay pantay equal voting power,3. impracticability=12 councilors therefore may impracticability

dahil hindi equal sa number of committees

4. may mandate sa local councils na pwede madetach ang reps5. anong assurance na magpperform ang councilors?

xx. Heart: we are still bound to the consti kahit na we think it is outdated,role of reps is not clear for some

xxi. Erika: aitsc hindi kasama sa local consti1. careful sa words2. from the start naiinhibit na ang reps sa councilor vs councilor


10/18

xxii. Maan: consti may be outdated but it will still take precedence...it is thehighest form of law of the land.

1. Impracticabilityif there is no way a councilor can do thisresponsibility...the burden of proof does not lie on the

councilor, it should be on the reps2. Consti based on the Students mandate sa reps na Im voting

him/her to rep the college, councilor mandate na Im voting or

you based on the projects na ibibigay mo on a university widelevel

3. Dapat applicable sa time? As long as it can still be followed.4. Amendments take a very long and messy process...we have to

make this work

5. Hindi enough ang councilors based on the number ofcommitteesthen burden falls on the reps to fill the remaining

committees

xxiii. Jonas: when does practicability start? College reps should step upkung naexhausted na lahat ng councilors

1. babalik tayo sa political design, kaya hinid kawalan angpagiging head

2. Be the bridge firstwhat is the USC to the LCs?3. Councilors were elected at large4. Reps is at the forefront

xxiv. Jio: when? View at the stand point na we see that a councilmate hasthe potential to serve at palawakin ang adbokasiya. Paano kung hindinaman interested ang councilor sa committee napunta sa kanya?

1. Ano ang kakayahan nya?2. Mandate of vote: councilors were elected to serve Univ as a

whole

3. We should think that a rep will propose if he sees the need.Ano ba talaga ang potentials at kakayahan?

xxv. Rage: maiiwasan ang problem sa impracticability kung ibase saproposals. Dun tayo magdeliberate sa proposal.

1. Isapuso ang plano at advocacy.2. Ung idea mo ba gusto mong ibigay sa iba?

xxvi. Heart: kung may idea tayo magtulungan tayo as a committee. At theend of the day kung sino ung head magtulungan tayo,

xxvii. Jonas: if and when a college rep heads a committee, ang stand ngcommittee will be the stand of the college

xxviii. Alex c1. Dapat sundan ang consti..lahat tayo ang lumabag na sa consti:

dapat pinaboto din ang mga taga manila (this is a

manifestation na very outdated na ang consti). tama ang sinabi


11/18

ni eds, evaluate the person based on capabilities and base them

on the proposals

2. Serve the peoplegive them the head who is the most capableto serve

3. Re College reps: college lang dapat siya? We are limiting themto their colleges (kasi anong alam ko sa ibang college)

4. We want to bring them out of their college and influence morestudents and engage moreif mas capable naman siya

xxix. Marky: we should then void the usc last year. Will we not recognizethem as comm heads?

1. (Affirm alex na nakasulat na may UP manila but hindi tayonakakapagserve sa manila.)

2. Voted out large din naman ako, sa college ko nga lang. Maymandato pa rin ako ng college ko na chumerva ka diyan.

3. GailMaging liason namna siya at nagampanan namna nya angrole bilang head ng COFs

4. Orly slis maganda naman ung nagawa nya5. Usapin ng impracticability: why not payagan kung makakabuti

naman for our constituents6. Re jonas: kung natalo ang reps over the councilor kunin ang

ideas then pwede din naman baliktarinxxx. Tina: uphold consti or the model proposal and look the merits of

proposal but do we all agree na ung provision na mauuna talaga ang

councilor? Oo.1. We are mandated by the constitution kaya kailangan nating

sunduinAs long as its there.2. Wala silang law to stand on..in front of the students anong

sasabihin? Internal arrangements pero pwede naman tayo

magpopropose ng amendments. Kailangan pagbotohan ngbuong UP ang amendments

3. Hindi siya impossible (councilor vs rep) it would seem unfairpero kailangan nating siya sunduin dahil un ung nakasulat

4. Practicability: case to case, pagdumating ang sit na magkalabanang councilor vs rep (although proposal is a factor) dapatcouncilor kung kaya nyang gawin ang role.

5. Ipit na ipt na tayoconsensus na to. Deep factor if not able toperform

xxxi. Jules:1. Point of inquiry: ano ang basis ng college rep na pwede sila

tumakbo dahil wala tayong law? Pwede bang may resolution

para may basehan na?

a. Motion for a resolution:i. Tina: applicable lang yan sa atin


12/18

ii. Accdg to our interpretation, at least for our termmagawan, kaso wala tayong legislative body.

b. Heart: we dont interpret the law for our own benefit.Re: consti: only way, amend it. I dont think we can have

a resolution kasi you will suspend the entire consti.Hindi pwedeng ito lang kasi we are already bending the

rules.

c. Tina: phil legal ssystem: ex phil consti (kailangan merontalagang violation to a grave extent not just being

unfair)

d. Heart: lahat naman tayo capable. Wag natin maliitine. Tina: ilan ang pwede ipropose?f. Heart: propose kasi gusto siya I head not just because

wala akong ihhead

g. Eds: POI: pwede ba tayong amend before delibs?h. Tina: possible but not probable...kasi ibig sabihin

kailangan mag submit ng bagong consti

i. Heart: may guidelinesj. Jules: POI: if we are at the point na college reps na, ok

lang ba wala siya pinanghahawakan na law/rule?

k. Heart: We can question that kasi may wisdom from theprevious USC. We see the merit pero late na

napagusapan or nabring up

2. problematic ang impracticabilitya. wag maliitin na mandato ng natirang commb. mechanism to determinec. wisdom of the council to interpretd. mas maging responsive tayo sa context

xxxii. Aryanna1. Contention: wag na sana umabot na magkaroon ng councilor vs

rep

2. Try to find a way to go around it to adapt to the currentsituation

3. Do we want to stick to the consti?a. Heart: opinion: ayaw ko ng hierarchy tayo ng

committee.. ayaw ko magkakaroon ng kung ano ang mas

importantei. Kung councilor vs college rep: exhaust na lang

muna ng councilors based on preference. Pwedenating tignan na lang ung preference.

b. Marky: walang hierarchy, pero ang lalabas, latak langung natira for the reps

c. Heart: dapat kaya mo talagang gampanan


13/18

d. Marky: Kung ganun? Unfair sa college rep kasi limitedna lang to express ng advocacies

xxxiii. Pat1. As councilors, tumakbo tayo with the intention of heading a

comm.2. What will be the councilors major role kung wala siya ihhead?

a. Heart: un ung mali, as part of cssc given na akomaghhead ng committee (bigayan pa nga e). ako tamaung sinabi ni jonas na may political design ang ating

council na may mandate ang councilor na ihead ang mga

committee. Ito kasi ang role ko. Some here can say napwede akong mag head ng LCC pero mandate ung sa VC.

Now why do we question the mandate of thecouncilors?

b. Erika: edi mag member ka ng committee.c. Heart: malinaw sa atin ngayon, na hindi natin nililimit

sa paghehead ang pag express ng ating advocacies

xxxiv. Revee1. Burden of proof nasan? Lets go back to the constitution2. Sites Gasc incident3. Kailangan sigurong isacrifice..,naniniwala tayo na may

kakayahan ng reps. It is their challenge na ilabas ang college

nila sa university. Kung sa engg may 2 reps kasi malakihow

ever we have different jobs. At the end of the day, maydistinction of jobs.

4. Lahat tayo kaya maghead ng committee.5. Go back to the consti kasi un ung mandate. Iboboto ko siya as

councilor kasi ito ung kaya nya I forward ung advocacies. Reps

para ilabas ang college6. If we want to take it absolutely now, we want to take it as a

challenge

7. How can we be more productive?xxxv. Sol

1. Hindi talaga sya limitation sa tao2. Hindi tayo pwede mamili ng rule based on convenience.3. Prepared siya for eventuality na it allows the rep to head on

the premise na mas madami ang committees.xxxvi. Eds

1. Kung equated ang mandate of votes/bilang ng boto: may mgareps na mas madami ang boto

2. We all agree na outdated na ang conti: magsimula tayo ngpagaamend ng consti. To better serve the student kaya natin


14/18

tiisin ang mahabang prosesso para hindi kailangang pagdaanan

ng mga future council itong usaping to.

a. Motion: na may equal footing ang councilors and repsb. Heart: we cant go back to the merit of what happened

last year.c. Tina: counter motion: para hindi sabihin na we are

cutting it short or iniikutanfollow the consti but we

propose the standard of what is impracticabled. Erika: loophole ang impracticabilitye. Heart: we cant adapt the resolution (eds) for us to

follow the consti and have an equal footingxxxvii. Pats: arguments are subjective, not defined but how fairI dont hear

councilor being liaisons to their colleges1. Lets be logical2. Inevitable naman that we all be a part of a committee.3. Eds: poi: can we adopt the committees? Or dapat start from 0?

a. Did we all read the consti?4. Tina: no may choice tayo to adopt or abolish

xxxviii. Erika: motion to divide the housexxxix. Jonas: kahit na idivide, Babalik na we violate the consti

1. No one regulates us to follow the consti2. The practicability issue: too subjective na pinapasok lahat ng

loopholes...bakit nating pinapasok ung convenience natin,

balikan natin ung context.3. Heart: we should not interpret4. Eds: not twisting but we are arguing for what is best. Iamend

na lang natin ung consti. Makakatulong sa future. Hindi

magiging hadlang ang paghehead.

5. Maan: when we amend, it will not take effect on us. Pero ok naiamend

6. Heart: we need to convene an independent body to amend7. Sol: until hindi pa siya amended it will not take effect.8. Alex c: hindi ba pwedeng magkaroon ng motion about the

impracticability chuvaxl. Tina: Re equal footing: hindi pwedeng iconstrue dapat based on usual

usewala dapat bias

xli. Heart:1. councilor vs councilor and rep vs rep based on proposal2. councilor vs rep: rep must prove that the councilor is not

practicable to head the committee.

3. Aryanna: that judgment is then subjective to the body4. Tina: not just a single factordapat iprove na impossible na

magagawa nya ang paghead.


15/18

5. Maan: you need to present the proof talaga6. Heart: therefore not just based on the proposal but also the

proof na hindi tlaga nya kaya ganapanxlii. Eds: Impracticabilitymay sense of subjectivity. Kung lahat naman

may background check sa isat isa. Mainam na measure ofimpracticability ang botohan

1. Maan: burden of the rep to propose and sufficiently prove theimpracticability

2. motion to follow the constixliii. Heart: pano natin masasabi na sufficient na?

1. Erika: magkakarron ng rep na impracticability sicouncilorpag hindi na prove then automatic na siya na?

heart: automatic2. Heart: ulit lang natin councilor vs councilor and rep vs rep

based on proposal, councilor vs rep: rep must prove that the

councilor is not practicable to head the committee.3. Marky: POI: paano pa naglaban si councilor and rep tapos si

councilor kayang kaya nya pero waley na waley ung proposal

tas si rep sobrang ganda ng proposal as in bongga ang gagandang poject niya?

4. Reg: kailan kailangang iprove?5. Heart: hindi ka pwedeng manalo over the councilor kung hindi

mo maprove

6. Eds: so papangalang na talaga?7. Heart; matagal na tayo nagdecide dyan8. Heart: may motion kanina to follow the consti? So kailangan

iprove na impracticable for the councilor (councilor vs

councilor and rep vs rep based on proposal, councilor vs rep:

rep must prove that the councilor is not practicable to head thecommittee)

a. debate ngayon paano iidentifiy kung sufficient na ungproof ?

9. Tina: motion:a. proposal: ipainterpret sa 3rd party ang impracticability?

10.Alexc: ayan sa dormers11.Heart: Ok lang ba?12.Tina: dapat sa legal office like practicing law officedapat no

affilications

13.Eds, marky: gem, krissy14.Heart: dapat hindi affiliated para makuha ung general meaning

of the word

15.Eds: krissy: student din siyatherefore mas naiintindihan nya


16/18

16.Joeric: may consensus na consti na? so ung meaning the wordna lang?

17.Heart: ulit councilor vs ccouncilor and rep vs rep=merit ofproposalscouncilor vs rep: rep must prove that the councilor

is not practicable to head the committee.so when is itsufficient?

a. Pwede isang point ung proposal: but that is not a pointof impracticability

18.Eds: pwede magmanifest ng feelings?19.Heart: summarize ano ba ang not practicable at kailangang

iprove ng college repa. pag hindi napatunay the councilor na..,b. pagnapatunay

i. College rep: dapat mas maganda ung proposaland prove impracticable si councilor therefore

automatic si CR not unless may isang pang CRthen vote

20.Alex c: parang sinisiraan si Councilor. kaya dapat on the meritof the proposal.

21.Heart: We already established that we are following theconstinow we need guidelines for the impracticability

22.Alex c: propose both kung mas maganda na kung kay councilorthen hindi kailangang iprove ang impracticability

23.Eds: sana wag natayo umabot nakailangang sabihin naimpracticable si councilor..if ever kung ako magiinhibit na lang

ako bilang reppwede naman maging membera. Sana masigurado ng konseho na tulungan natin future

councils

24.Heart: bagsakan si eds. In any case, it wont naman apply foreveryone na magiinhibit si CR. Kapag mas maganda talaga ung

proposal ng CR then dun lang bibigyan ng time na iprove ang

impracticability25.Revee: what if councilors lang muna ung magsusubmit? Kahit

names lang26.Heart: april 24 for submission of councilors proposal.27.Alex c: after presentation of proposalspwede bang imove ung

day na ipoprove ung impracticability ni Councilor?28.Heart: we wont we will decide as a body ung merit ng proposal

pag sobrang layo ng kagandahan.29.Alexc: That means na nakapagbackground check na ako before

hand...if that happened to me I would feel violated.

30.Heart: mature naman tayong lahat to not take things toopersonally


17/18

31.Carla: inevitable na magkakasakitan32.Alex c: kunyari councilor ako, si marky ung repmas maganda

proposal ko, so what are the grounds na hindi ako practicable?Example sobrang babagsak na ako ipapatanggal na ako sa UP.

Pero ayaw ko talaga ipaalam un sa lahat. So imove na langnatinnanalo nga ako pero nalaman naman nya so I feel

violated.

33.Eds: ayaw ko talaga ng mudslingingso on the grounds na langof the merit of the proposal?

34.Revee: when we prove impracticability.we have to becautious.

35.Eds: pano un? Ilalabas mo ung mental incapacity of the personin a subtle way?

36.DORMER (Kenneth): maganda ung imove ung date of provingthe impracticability.

a. Lets be result oriented first: ung practicability as statedin the consti if you prove give them time bago

magbackground check

b. When you are working, you lineate between emotionsand resultsbakit ka maooffend kung sabihin na

impracticable ka. We are all expecting good results fromthe USC. Lets keep it black and white and be

professional. Kung mahirap e pinasok nyo yan.

37.Heart: Ito nakapag na prove na mas maganda ung proposal niCR thats the only time we prove ones impracticabilitygoal ng

councilor to supersede the proposal. Kung mas maganda kayCR then the next day ipprove ung impracticability ni councilor.

a. Set ng guideline: kuha ng isang body na walang alam saUSC culture...get people our side UP.

b. Ulit councilor vs college rep councilor agad pero kungmas maganda talaga ung CR magkakaraoon ng isang

araw to prove the impracticability...now we just have toset the guidelines on the impracticability

38.Tina: 3 legal opinion: post names (of law institution or firm notjust a person) until 11:59pm

39.Heart: level up dapat to for the councilor40.Erika: dapat nga 2 proposals lang41.Heart: what if gusto mo talaga ung 5? When you propose dahil

gusto mo talaga ung committee na un.42.Eds: pwede bang 23?43.Heart: ok lang two ang ipropose?44.Reg: max of 3 then sa april 24 ung proposal ng councilors pero

hindi pa irereveal


18/18

45.Eds: ilagay ung choices46.Heart: dapat equal bearing ung mga committees47.Erika: tapos na ba to? Paano ung mga late and other

provisions?

48.Heart: so far bagsakan na natin ung consensus na councilor vscollege rep

a. legal institutions: bawal partisan, or affiliated49.Revee: mauuna ung standing?50.Heart: yes. plus gender fresher cofs craw peopstrg..51.Eds: bunutan na lang ung first 5 ssc?52.Heart: bunutan na lang or sabihin nyo ung schedules nyo para

maayos kung anong committees ang iddeliberate muna

a. Tatlong bagsak!19.Meeting Adjourned

Signed and approved by:

Alexandra Maria Francia Santos

USC Secretary General

Heart Dino

USC Chairperson

usc ga april 16

Documents