usaid-cifor-icraf project assessing the implications of climate change for usaid forestry programs...
TRANSCRIPT
USAID-CIFOR-ICRAF ProjectAssessing the Implications of Climate Change for USAID Forestry Programs (2009)
Carbon accounting: Monitoring
Topic 4, Section F
Learning outcomes
In this presentation you will
learn about various
monitoring methods for
carbon accounting.
Topic 4, Section F, slide 2 of 29
Outline1. USAID project monitoring for performance
• Data needed for Forest Carbon Calculator
2. Detailed project monitoring• Monitoring plans• Sampling• Collecting and analyzing data
3. General concepts and guidance
4. National monitoring systems• Forest carbon inventory of India• Australian national carbon accounting system• US Forest Service carbon inventory
Topic 4, Section F, slide 3 of 29
USAID’s standard climate change indicator
USAID’s standard climate change CO2 indicator:
“Quantity of greenhouse gas emissions, measured in metric tons of CO2 equivalent, reduced or sequestered as a result of USG assistance in natural resources management, agriculture, and/or biodiversity sectors.”
This indicator can be used at the project level with USAID’s Forest Carbon Calculator
If the project is to influence national level policy, the USAID indicator, will be a policy indicator, not CO2
If USAID engages in large-scale attempts to change a country’s emissions trajectory, then national GHG inventory done with host government provides CO2 impact measures
Topic 4, Section F, slide 4 of 29
Data needed for project monitoring with USAID’s Forest Carbon Calculator
Locations of projects according to administrative unit, such as state or district
How many hectares are affected by the activity, such as area of forest protected, reforested, regenerated, or under agroforestry
Measure of project effectiveness: • % reduction in deforestation, • % of trees that survive at end of the year, • % of logging stopped or % of logging that is being done with
reduced impact
Documentation of how you estimated project effectiveness measures
Topic 4, Section F, slide 5 of 29
Detailed project monitoring
More site-specific monitoring may be desired for project performance or required for carbon finance
Requires a monitoring plan and approach Monitoring that seeks to measure actual carbon
accumulation in soils may be outside the timescale of USAID funding, so measures of activity adoption may be more practical
Topic 4, Section F, slide 6 of 29
Manuals and guidebooks
MacDicken (1997)
IPCC GPG (2003)
Pearson et al. (2005)
GOFC-GOLD (2008)
Topic 4, Section F, slide 7 of 29
What to monitor?
Topic 4, Section F, slide 8 of 29
How to proceed?Define monitoring boundaries (national, project, etc.)
Stratify the area to be monitored
Decide which carbon pools to measure (5 pools)
Determine type, number and location of measurement plots
Determine measurement/monitoring frequency
Topic 4, Section F, slide 9 of 29
Measuring and monitoring plan for a project-based activity
Source: IPCC GPG 2003:
Topic 4, Section F, slide 10 of 29
General approach to monitoring Monitoring carried out through sampling and using existing forest
inventory and other data sources
Monitoring should produce estimates of carbon stocks that are both precise and accurate
These will affect the monitoring costs
It is important to design a monitoring system (using stratification, etc.) that produces the desired precision and accuracy with minimal costs
(A) Accurate but not precise
(B) Precise but not accurate
(C) Precise and accurate
Topic 4, Section F, slide 11 of 29
Sample size
Calculate the sample size n (number of plots) – based on pre-sampling
Where
• n = number of plots to be measured
• Syx = estimation error
• t = Studet t value
• S = variance
• X = mean value
Topic 4, Section F, slide 12 of 29
Stratification
Allows researchers obtain precise estimates at a lower cost than without stratification
Steps:
• Divide heterogeneous population into homogenous groups
• Apply monitoring (sampling and calculations) to each strata and compile results at the end
Topic 4, Section F, slide 13 of 29
Field plotsThis schematic diagram represents a three-nest sampling plot in both circular and rectangular forms
Source: Pearson et al. 2006
Topic 4, Section F, slide 14 of 29
Frequency of monitoring
For carbon accumulation, the frequency of measurements should be defined in accordance with the rate of change of the carbon stock• Forest processes are generally measured over periods of
five-year intervals
• Carbon pools that respond more slowly, such as soil, are measured every 10 or even every 20 years
See the graph in the next slide
Source: IPCC GPG 2003; Pearson et al. 2005
Topic 4, Section F, slide 15 of 29
Detecting the difference Two means (time 1 and time 2) RME = Reliable Minimum Estimate When number of observations (plots) increases -> variability of the
data (standard deviation) decreases
A data set with a mean of 50 (shown in blue) and a standard deviation (σ) of 20.
Standard deviation explained
Topic 4, Section F, slide 16 of 29
Source: IPCC GPG 2003
RME 1 is smaller than RME 2
Tons/cell = (tons/ha)*0.0001*(30^2)
Noel Kempff Project (Bolivia): 625 permanent sample plots were measured in 640,000 ha
Vegetation classes Tons of carbon/cell
Topic 4, Section F, slide 17 of 29
Noel Kempff (Bolivia) carbon inventoryResults based on 625 permanent plots
Source: Brown et al., 2000
Topic 4, Section F, slide 18 of 29
Leakage (displacement)
Carbon leakage takes place when interventions to reduce emissions in one geographical area lead to an increase in emissions in another area• Example: if curbing agricultural encroachment into forests in one
region results in conversion of forests to agriculture in another region
In the context of REDD, leakage is also referred to as ‘emissions displacement’
In the Noel Kempff project:• Leakage for the stop-logging component was thoroughly screened
and found to be in the 2 to 42% range• Deforestation in local communities actually increased initially, which
was hoped to be transitory, related to the creation of new land-use systems
Topic 4, Section F, slide 19 of 29
Quality assurance and quality control
QA/QC elements: Reliable field measurements
• Re-check measurements with independent crew (10 to 20% of plots re-measured)
Verify laboratory procedures
• Re-analyse 10 to 20% of samples
Verify data entry and analysis techniques
• Check 10 to15% of the data entries
Adequate data maintenance and archiving
• Make sure that data (including computer files, imagery etc.) is adequately achieved
Topic 4, Section F, slide 20 of 29
National forest carbon inventory of India
Stratification• The country is stratified into 14
physiographic zones• In each strata, districts are considered
first sampling units, 10% of districts are being inventoried every year
Field measurements• National grid and sub-grids are marked as the center of the plot at which
a square sample plot of 0.1 hectare is laid out to conduct field inventory of trees
• Soil, litter, and humus samples are collected in sub-plots
Carbon calculation• Based on stem volumes obtained in forest inventory• Using expansion factors for conversion from volumes to carbon
Topic 4, Section F, slide 21 of 29
Australian National Carbon Accounting System (NCAS) Components:
Remotely sensed land cover change (including mapped information from thousands of satellite images)
Land-use and management data
Climate and soil data Greenhouse gas accounting
tools Spatial and temporal
ecosystem modeling
Topic 4, Section F, slide 22 of 29
US Forest Service Carbon Inventory
USDA Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) inventory data coupled with a modeling approach
Data from many field plots, collected by FIA beginning in 1950s
Area data from remote sensing
Where FIA data are limited models, such as equations to estimate non-tree carbon are used
System (model) can track carbon through harvested wood products
Topic 4, Section F, slide 23 of 29
Large-scale field inventories include remote sensing for area estimation
Sample points are
located systematically
over the effective area
and land cover is
determined at the point
Topic 4, Section F, slide 24 of 29
USDA Forest Inventory Program Evolution
In the recent past, FIA periodically (5-14 years) measured all plots in a state in a 1-2 year timeframe
FIA recently adopted annual inventory, with a subset of plots measured throughout the state each year (5-7 years)
Soil and litter layer carbon measured on subset of plots in new system
Topic 4, Section F, slide 25 of 29
US National GHG reporting to UNFCCC Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks Inventories
(1990-present) US Environmental Protection Agency
Topic 4, Section F, slide 26 of 29
Discussion
How should a USAID project set up its monitoring? What fits within its timescale and funding?
Is the accuracy of good measures worth the cost?
Topic 4, Section F, slide 27 of 29
References Brown, S. 1997 Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. FAO Forestry
Paper no. 134. Brown, S. 2002 Measuring carbon in forests: current status and futurechallenges Environ. Pollut.
116:363-72. Brown, S. and Gaston, G. 1995 Use of forest inventories and geographic information systems to
estimate biomass density of tropical forests: applications to tropical Africa. Environ. Monit. Assess. 38:157-68.
Brown, S., Hall, M., Andrasko, K., Ruiz, F., Marzoli, W., Guerrero, G., Masera, O., Dushku, A., de Jong, B. and Cornell, J. 2007 Baselines for land-use change in the tropics: application to avoided deforestation projects. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12:1001-26.
Brown, S., Burnham, M., Delaney, M., Vaca, R., Powell, M. and Moreno, A. 2000. Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon offset projects: A case study of the Noel Kempff climate action project in Bolivia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5:99-121.
GOFC-GOLD. 2009. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and 46 degradation in developing countries: a sourcebook of methods and procedures 47 for monitoring, measuring and reporting, GOFC-GOLD Report version COP14-2, 48 (GOFC-GOLD Project Office, Natural Resources Canada, Alberta, Canada)
MacDicken, K. G. 1997 A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects. Winrock International.
Pearson, T., Walker, S. and Brown, S. 2005 Sourcebook for land use, land-use change and forestry projects. Winrock International and the BioCarbon Fund of the World Bank. 57p.
Penman, J. et al. 2003 Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Program and Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Kanagawa, Japan. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/gpglulucf.htm
Topic 4, Section F, slide 28 of 29
Thank you for your attention