usace asset management framework (amf) usace inland...definition-- asset management: • is a...
TRANSCRIPT
-
---
USACE
Asset Management Framework (AMF)
David Hale and Richard Woolridge
Aging Infrastructure Systems Center of Excellence
The University of Alabama
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA 1f.iiif.il INFRASTRUCT URE © AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007 ~
http:1f.i'if.il
-
----
Focus • Facts and Figures
• Goal of Asset Management o Definitions o Conceptual Models o Value
• Budgeting • Sustainability • Building Business Cases
• Asset Management Framework o Decision Framework o levels of Decision Making Asset Management Framework Team o Process Model • Jose Sanchez
• AMF Cornerstones • Mark Hammond (Project Coordinato Data Definition SCollection Standardization • Theodore A. Brown o Good Science/Engineering/Economics • David P. Hale o Transparency • T. Randall Curlee
• Next Steps • Tim Smitho Build on Existing Initiatives • Wesley Walker o Extend Tools • Richard Woolridge
• John R. Yeager
or)
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT U RE 2© AISCE I USACE September 24 , 2007
-
---
Asset Facts and Figures:
Civil Works
OWNED "Short list" 43,000 Structures 285000 Tracts of land
12000 Buildings
Includes: 1000 Coastal Structures
600 Dams 2500 Recreational Areas 250 Locks
75 Hydropower
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA Jf.iiif.il INFRASTRUCT URE -~ © AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
http:Jf.i'if.il
-
---
43,000
~----------~
Facts and Figures:
USACE Real Property Inventory
50,000
40,000 D Buildings
30,000 D Structulies
D In-leases
US ACE
20,000
10,000
HE UNIVERSITY OF
LABAMA FRASTRUCT URE
64,000 Assets (11.8M Acres)
© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
Lf.iiif.ilT
AIN
~
http:Lf.i'if.il
-
Asset Management
Why Now?
Lifecycle Infrastructure Management: USACE Campaign Goal 3c- The Right Business Practices
Executive order 13327-Right-sizing inventory
Budget Performance Integration- Program Assessment Rating Tool-Right performance
,f.iiif.il -~ © AISCE I USACE September 24 , 2007
http:f.i'if.il
-
---
Definition-- Asset Management:
• Is a risk-based decision-making process • to allocate resources over time • for the operation, maintenance, repair,
rehabi Iitation, replacement, decommissioning, or transfer of assets
• in order to maximize underlying asset value realization
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 6© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
---
IAsset Value Realization
• Maximize Net Benefits
o National and local economic, environmental, social, cultural , and other objectives
• Maximize Performance o Assets do what they are intended, or expected, to do o Assets may be measured for more than one purpose
• Manage Risk o Risk= Consequence of something bad happening X
Probability of that something happening
• Manage Resource Utilization o There is lots to do and not much to do it with
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 7© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
------
!Asset Management Facilitates Decisions
• Decisions Type
o Investigation o Development o Sustainment/Preservation/Maintenance o Recapitalization o Decommissioning
• Decision Basis o Performance (Structural/Capacity) o Consequence (Benefit/Risk)
• Uses of Asst Management o Lifecycle Management/Sustainment o Budget o Risk Reduction o Economic and Quality of Life Valuation and Generation
• Stakeholders/Participants o OMS I Congress o Corps Leadership o Business Lines o Division I District Leaders o Public/Users
• Bottom-line: Asset Management is Systematic o Prioritization and Resource Allocation
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 8© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
-------
Asset Management Strategies
New asset
_. ~ .......................................~~!~!~L.~.~?.~!:!.·..~~D.?.!~!~f.ljlr.~.9.~..~~·:.................................................................................................................................................................................................. .
.c
Strategy c
Strategy a
~~ A ~Stra
Minimum Acce table Level
_. Ul ..... . 0 3:
••• I
-··-+ Asset Age and Lifespan (in years) 20 40 80 oc • varies between asset types, construction, usage •
THE UNIVERSITY OF (f.iiif.ilALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE -~ © AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
http:f.i'if.il
-
----
IAMF Integ rates
o Organization - Headquarters, Business Lines , Districts and
Divisions
o Watersheds- Hierarchy of River Systems including Tributaries and Harbors and all their Features
o Assets- Hierarchy of Assets from the Systems to Facilities , Structures, Components and Watershed Features
o Decisions - Strategies and Choices
o Analytics- Metrics and Targets Organization
Aeeete WatershedTHE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 10© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
------
IAMF Use- Goal Setting
AMF Comm and Structure
Asset Treatments
_______1
&. Actions __________________BL2
_____ .. • •
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 1 1 © AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
------
IAMF Use- Monitoring
AMF Control & Decision Structure
US ACE
BL1 ---------- BL2 BLN---------------------THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 12© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
------
An asset or system is currently in some condition.
All alternatives of all assets To achieve some metric some prioritized and ranked for condition is required. ----budget.
····· ........ ···· Decisions: ·-..............
/,...· Develop '···········...
Operate Maintain
Decommission Transfer
Investigate
·· ....... .. ..... ............... .··•·······
Expected
Many alternatives to Consequence
hen current 1: required, then correct over different time consequences to metric are horizons. calculated.
IAMF Factor Interactions
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 13© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
---
IAsset Management Framework Properties
• Context-Specific Recommendation
(Decision) Support Tool that enables:
o Sustainment strategies driven and supported by
Benefits and Consequences o Benefits and Consequences are Analytics Supported o Aligned Budget Process and AMF o Extensible AMF approach driven by Results
• System Focused providing Roll-Up Reporting and Drill-Down Analysis
• Comparability Across Districts, Divisions,
Business Lines
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 14© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
---
IAMF Cornerstones
• Data Definition and Collection Standardization
• Good Engineering/Science/Economics
{P rob a biI i sti c/Determ inisti ciT emporal) For Metrics and Decision Support
• Standard Repeatable Processes • Transparency in Metrics and Decisions
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 15© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
--------
Next Steps-Leverage Current Corps Initiatives
FY07 USACE Risk/Perform;:~nceiBudget Metrics Progr;:~m/lniti;:~tive/Study
ProRJamllnitiative/Study. POC Phone Nlllional Asset ·Management Program Jose S.anchez tERDQ 202-1&U&57
X Asset Management Framework (AMFI X LRD Auet Management Plan for O&M
Mark Hammond (lRH) Jim Fisher (LRP)
304.39!Ui928 412-395-7601
Dam S.fety Progrllm Eric Halpin (.H Q) 202-7&1-7715 X sPRA Oar111 X PRA Darn Methodology X PRA levee Methodology
Andy Harkness (lRP) Andy Harkness (LRP) Andy Harkness (lRP)
412-395.7230 412-395-1230 412-395-723ll
EC Budget Program George Lea (HQ) 202 .7614155 X Nwigation Businss lin11. Budget EC
LRD Five Year Development Plan (FYDP) X GllOPM
Flood and Storm Damage Reduction Budget EC X Ecosystem Restoration Budget EC X Environment Stewardship Budget EC
HydropoWI:r Budget EC X Recreation Budget EC X Water Suppl!f Budget EC X OMB IL
f= -Risk BISed Stud ies
Jim Walker (HQI Bill Harder ILRD) Jon Brown (LRBI Bill Oiapman (LRO) Renny Sherman (HQ) Oenilc White Kamau Sadiki (HQ) Pep Persio (HQ) Ted Hillyer (IWR) David Lichy (NVR) I= -Tom Waters tHQl
202 .76,U48 51J.684-6SZ5 716.879..4 430 513.684-3014 202-7&1-7711 ZOZ-761 ..47114 202-7&1..4889 202 -761~016 703..428.6140 703-428.9051
f 202:1'61~115 X louisiana Co•tal Protection Restoration (LACPR) Edmo nd Russo (EROC) 601.634.2067 X Milslss ippl Co ntat Improvements Prognrm (MsCIP) Susan Rns (SAM) l51.694.4141 X Interagency Enlulllion Pcrform1111ce Taskforce (I PET) J eremy Stevenwon ILRH) 304-399-6948 X LRD ORMSS SIP Jane Ruhl (LRL) S02-315UD2
Upper Ohio Fc • ibilily Study Kevin l ogan (LRP) 412395-1309 X Criticallnfr•lrudure Security Program Yaz.min Sed•Ss11ahris (H Q) 202-761.4667
Non-Corps lnititaliw·S Nlllional Ass cl Dlllab• e Nllionallnfr•trudureProtedion Plan , Oam.s Sector -Specific Plan Risk Analpls and Management for Critical Asset Proteclion Modulo for Darns Nll'lfia.lllion loeb and Leven tRAM CAP-DAMS}
Timothy Huddleston (DHS) Enrique E. Mlllhau (OHS) Enrique E. Mlllheu (OHS)
703.605 .1213 703.605-1213
denotu fsct sheells completed THE UJ:o-.'1\'ERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCTURE 16© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
-
------------------
Next Steps- Extend/Refine AMF Tools to
Align Benefits with Investment Strategies
Background - Asset Management Process Development
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE
• Assessment Methodology
• Assessment Team
• Rating Scale • Cost Effective
© AISCE I USACE September 24 , 2007
Closures Loss of Service Property DamageA..oss Other
17
r r
Programming
and Budg@ting
Process
FY10
-
Questions
------
THE UNIVERSITY OF
ALABAMA INFRASTRUCT URE 18© AISCE I USACE September 24, 2007
USACE �Asset Management Framework (AMF) FocusFacts and Figures: �USACE Real Property InventoryDefinition-- Asset Management:Asset Value RealizationAsset Management Facilitates DecisionsAMF IntegratesAMF Use – Goal SettingAMF Use - MonitoringAsset Management Framework PropertiesAMF CornerstonesNext Steps- �Leverage Current Corps InitiativesNext Steps- Extend/Refine AMF Tools to Align Benefits with Investment Strategies Questions